Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Characterising exchange of stability in scalar reaction-diffusion equations via geometric blow-up

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that reaction-diffusion solutions on the whole line crossing a slow transcritical or pitchfork bifurcation exit exponentially close to a homogeneous attracting slow manifold.

desk verdict A novel and mostly well-argued geometric blow-up framework for PDE slow-passage problems, but with a false semigroup contraction lemma in the K2 tracking estimates that is repairable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13679 v1 pith:B6QNGIBT submitted 2024-11-20 math.DS math.AP

Samuel Jelbart , Christian Kuehn , Alejandro Martínez Sánchez This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.AP MSC 35B2535B3235B4035K5737L10
keywords Geometricblow-upReaction-diffusionequationsDynamicbifurcationSlowpassageExchangeofstabilityTranscriticalsingularityPitchforkCentermanifoldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a scalar reaction-diffusion equation on $\mathbb{R}$ whose reaction term passes slowly through a transcritical or pitchfork bifurcation undergoes a clean exchange of stability: solutions that enter a neighbourhood of the singularity on the stable side leave it exponentially close to the attracting spatially homogeneous branch selected by the sign of the normal-form parameter. This matters because the same phenomenon was proved earlier on bounded domains by comparison methods, whereas here it is obtained by geometric blow-up, the standard tool for ODE slow-passage problems, adapted to an infinite-dimensional parabolic setting. The authors' chief claim is methodological: the blow-up resolves the spectral degeneracy caused by continuous spectrum filling the negative real axis, creates a spectral gap, and lets centre-manifold theory in Banach spaces organise the proof. If correct, the result gives a template for dynamic bifurcations in PDEs beyond these two normal forms.

What carries the argument

The central object is the geometric blow-up map $\Phi$ given by $(u,\mu,\varepsilon)=(r\bar u,r^{s-1}\bar\mu,r^{2(s-1)}\bar\varepsilon)$ for $s=2$ (transcritical) or $s=3$ (pitchfork), together with the state-dependent rescalings of time and space in each chart. In the entry chart ($\bar\mu=-1$) and exit chart ($\bar\mu=1$), the linearized operators have spectra $(-\infty,-1]\cup\{0\}$ and $(-\infty,-2]\cup\{0\}$, respectively; the spectral gap makes the hypotheses of the centre-manifold theorem for semilinear parabolic equations checkable. The resulting two-dimensional, strongly attracting centre manifolds are made of spatially constant profiles, so their extension through the rescaling chart is governed by the planar ODE system of [34], and an error equation with the heat semigroup controls how closely PDE solutions track that extension.

What would settle it

The deciding calculation is the operator norm of $e^{t\partial_x^2}$ on the weighted space $\widetilde Z$ for initial data whose second derivative decays polynomially, such as $v''(x)=(1+x^2)^{-1}$ with $v\in\widetilde Z$; if the weighted second-derivative norm grows like $\sqrt t$ for small $t$, then the bound $\|e^{t\Lambda}\|_{\widetilde Z\to\widetilde Z}\le 1$ is false, and the proof of Propositions 4.19 and 4.28 would require a different semigroup estimate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the exchange-of-stability theorem: for the transcritical normal form (4) with $\lambda>0$ and the pitchfork normal form (6) with $\lambda\neq 0$, a solution that enters the blow-up neighbourhood from $\Sigma_{\mathrm{in}}$ at $\mu=-\rho$ satisfies $u(x,T)=\phi(\rho,\varepsilon)+O(e^{-\gamma\rho^2/2\varepsilon})$ in the $\widetilde Z$-norm at time $T=2\rho/\varepsilon$, where $\phi$ (respectively $\phi_+$ or $\phi_-$) defines the attracting slow manifold branch. This extends the bounded-domain comparison-principle result of [7] to the whole line and, more importantly, gives a proof by geometric blow-up: the degenerate spectrum $(-\infty,0]$ of $\partial_x^2$ at the singularity is replaced in the blown-up charts by operators with a spectral gap, so centre-manifold theory applies and the PDE reduces to the planar ODE slow-passage dynamics of [34].

Load-bearing premise

The proof's load-bearing premise is that the heat semigroup is a contraction in the weighted space where errors are measured; if that estimate fails, the Gronwall bounds in the rescaling chart no longer justify the exponential closeness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the proof is right, exchange of stability holds on the unbounded line exactly as on bounded intervals: after the slow parameter passes through the bifurcation, the solution is exponentially close to the attracting homogeneous branch selected by the sign of $\lambda$.
  • The spectral-gap mechanism is a reusable route: one can replace a degenerate PDE linearization with a desingularized one bearing a spectral gap, which is precisely the setting in which infinite-dimensional centre-manifold theorems apply.
  • The tracking part of the argument shows that moderate-use techniques from modulation-equation theory suffice to control the PDE error over the finite time of the rescaling chart, because the slow manifolds are spatially homogeneous.
  • The paper leaves two natural boundaries: the transcritical case $\lambda<0$ (fast escape) and the pitchfork case $\lambda=0$ (canard window) are not covered, and the authors state that spatio-temporal canards at $\lambda=O(\varepsilon)$ remain open.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same three-chart construction should carry over to scalar reaction-diffusion equations with fold or hysteresis singularities, since the proof uses only the structure of the blow-up and the spectral shift, not the exact form of $f$.
  • Editorial inference: because the theorems tie the exponential rate to a spectral gap and give explicit ranges ($\gamma<1$ transcritical, $\gamma<2$ pitchfork), direct numerical simulation of the PDE in the weighted norm could test whether the $O(e^{-\gamma\rho^2/2\varepsilon})$ bound is sharp and where the error is largest.
  • Editorial inference: the spatial rescaling $x_i=x/r_i$ with its induced transport term resembles moving-coordinate methods, suggesting that the blow-up may be applicable to front propagation or interface problems where the natural spatial scale varies with time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a geometric blow-up method for scalar reaction-diffusion equations on the whole line with a slowly varying bifurcation parameter, focusing on transcritical and pitchfork normal forms (systems (4) and (6)). After deriving the normal forms and identifying the continuous-spectrum degeneracy of the linearized operator, the authors blow up the extended system and analyse it in entry, rescaling, and exit charts. In the entry and exit charts they verify the hypotheses of an infinite-dimensional center manifold theorem and obtain strongly attracting two-dimensional center manifolds; in the rescaling chart they use the ODE analysis of Krupa and Szmolyan to connect these manifolds and then prove that PDE solutions track the resulting slow manifold. The main results, Theorems 3.2 and 3.3, assert exponential closeness in the eZ norm to an attracting spatially homogeneous slow branch at time T = 2ρ/ε.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a substantial methodological contribution: it extends exchange-of-stability results from bounded domains [7] to the whole line and transfers the Krupa–Szmolyan geometric blow-up technique to a PDE setting by resolving a continuous-spectrum degeneracy into a spectral gap. The paper is careful about the functional-analytic setting, verifies the center-manifold hypotheses, and derives the connecting slow manifold from parameter-free ODE analysis rather than from fitting. The two main theorems are precise and falsifiable, with explicit ranges for the exponential rate γ. However, the current proof has a load-bearing gap in the heat-semigroup estimate used in the rescaling chart; the gap is local and appears repairable, but the manuscript as written is not complete.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix A, Lemma A.4] Lemma A.4 claims the bound ∥e^{t2Λ2}∥_{eZ→eZ} ≤ 1 in equation (61) for all t2 > 0. This bound is false. The proof is valid for the C^k sup norms of the kernel, but it does not justify the polynomial-weight bounds: the identity ∂_x² e^{tΛ}u0 = e^{tΛ}∂_x² u0 does not imply that ∥(1+x²)∂_x² e^{tΛ}u0∥∞ ≤ ∥(1+x²)∂_x² u0∥∞. A concrete counterexample is u0(x) = arctan x, which lies in eZ: the weighted second-derivative component of e^{tΔ}u0 grows like √t as t → ∞, as can be seen from the Fourier representation iπk e^{-|k|} e^{-t k²} after the scaling x = √t ξ. Hence (61) is not available in the form stated.
  2. [Propositions 4.19 and 4.28] Both proofs use the false bound (49)/(61) to obtain the Grönwall estimate ∥E(·,t2)∥_{eZ} ≤ e^{C1 t2}∥E(·,0)∥_{eZ} on the interval t2 ∈ [0,T2] with T2 = 2Ω. Since the heat semigroup is not contractive in the eZ norm, the estimates as written do not control the propagation of the exponentially small chart-K1 error through the rescaling chart. This is load-bearing for Theorems 3.2 and 3.3, because the K2 transition is the only step that connects the PDE error to the ODE slow manifold. Because T2 is fixed independently of ε, a corrected finite-time bound such as C(1+√t2) or Ce^{αt2} would likely restore the argument; nevertheless, the proof as written is incomplete.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1.4] After equation (50), the proof uses ν in the transition map and ρ in the theorem statement without explicitly setting ν = ρ; this should be clarified to avoid confusion.
  2. [Proposition 4.16] The exponential rate in assertion (i) is written with ν² while assertion (ii) has ν⁴; since the transition time is T3 = (1/2δ)((ν/r3)⁴ − 1), both exponents should be ν⁴ (up to the same constant).
  3. [Lemma A.1] The proof defines v := ϕM ˜v but then gives a piecewise definition of v with constant values u±∞ outside [−M−1, M+1]; the two definitions should be reconciled.
  4. [Section 4.2.2] In the definition of R3, the right-hand side uses R3 on both sides of the equality; this should be the original remainder R. Also, the set notation "r3[0,ν]" is missing the element symbol.
  5. [Appendix C, Lemma C.1] The far-field bound for x1 < −M is omitted with "similar arguments"; since this bound is needed for the resolvent estimate, the details should be written out or a precise reference supplied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the slow manifolds and the rescaling-chart connection are imported from the external ODE analysis [34], and the PDE tracking proof, though flawed by a false semigroup bound, does not reduce its conclusions to its premises.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (Theorems 3.2 and 3.3) assert exponential closeness to spatially homogeneous slow manifolds S_a^+ and S_a^+- defined in Lemma 3.1. These manifolds are not fit to PDE data and are not defined in terms of the solution u; their existence is quoted from Fenichel theory and from the external ODE paper [34] (Krupa and Szmolyan), which is independent of the present authors. The rescaling-chart connection Psi_2 in Lemmas 4.18 and 4.27 is likewise defined by extending the chart-K1 center manifold under the planar ODE flow, with the proof 'follows directly from the analysis in [34]'; this is an external, falsifiable slow-manifold result, not a self-citation. Propositions 4.19 and 4.28 then attempt to prove, not assume, that PDE solutions track Psi_2 through an error equation and a Gronwall estimate. The proof is not circular, although it relies on Lemma A.4's operator bound ||e^{tLambda}||_{eZ to eZ} <= 1, which is false; for v = arctan x one finds sup_x (1+x^2)|e^{tLambda} v''| growing like sqrt(t). That is a technical correctness gap in the tracking estimates, not a circular reduction: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the theorem's error terms are not present in the hypotheses. The only notable self-citation is [37], the corresponding author's Master's thesis, cited for the resolvent-kernel formula (34) in Lemma 4.10; it is a standard derivation and not load-bearing for the main claim. The paper is self-contained against the external benchmark [7], and its central invariant manifolds come from an external ODE source, so no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proofs import substantial machinery: infinite-dimensional center manifold theory [23], ODE geometric blow-up [34], and the authors' prior PDE blow-up framework [26,28]. No ad hoc fitted parameters or new physical entities are introduced. The main unverified premise is the heat semigroup contraction bound in Lemma A.4, which is false.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Center manifold theorem for semilinear parabolic equations in Banach spaces (Haragus & Iooss [23]) applies to the chart PDEs (27), (42), (51), (55).
    Invoked in Lemmas 4.11, 4.14, 4.22, 4.24 after verifying Hypotheses 1-3.
  • standard math The planar fast-slow ODE analysis in [34] fully describes the local dynamics of the spatially homogeneous solutions, including the extension of center manifolds through the rescaling chart K2.
    Used in Lemmas 3.1, 4.18, 4.27 to construct the connecting invariant manifold Ma2.
  • domain assumption The normal form transformations in Lemma 2.2 are valid for any f satisfying the generic conditions (T) or (P); the higher-order remainder R has the stated asymptotics.
    The theorem statements and proofs work entirely in the normal forms (4)/(6); any f outside these genericity conditions is not covered.
  • domain assumption Solutions of the original PDE (1) exist on the relevant time interval [0,T] and the state-dependent time-space rescaling (26) is a valid change of variables on the chosen Banach spaces.
    The paper does not prove well-posedness and treats the tracking of existing solutions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterising exchange of stability in scalar reaction-diffusion equations via geometric blow-up." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B6QNGIBT

@misc{pith2026241113679,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterising exchange of stability in scalar reaction-diffusion equations via geometric blow-up},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B6QNGIBT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13679}
}
read the original abstract

We study the exchange of stability in scalar reaction-diffusion equations which feature a slow passage through transcritical and pitchfork type singularities in the reaction term, using a novel adaptation of the geometric blow-up method. Our results are consistent with known results on bounded spatial domains which were obtained by Butuzov, Nefedov & Schneider using comparison principles like upper and lower solutions in [7], however, from a methodological point of view, the approach is motivated by the analysis of closely related ODE problems using geometric blow-up presented by Krupa & Szmolyan in [34]. After applying the blow-up transformation, we obtain a system of PDEs which can be studied in local coordinate charts. Importantly, the blow-up procedure resolves a spectral degeneracy in which continuous spectrum along the entire negative real axis is 'pushed back' so as to create a spectral gap in the linearisation about particular steady states which arise within the so-called entry and exit charts. This makes it possible to extend slow-type invariant manifolds into and out of a neighbourhood of the singular point using center manifold theory, in a manner which is conceptually analogous to the established approach in the ODE setting. We expect that the approach can be adapted and applied to the study of dynamic bifurcations in PDEs in a wide variety of different contexts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13679 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Local normal form geometry of the zero sets obtained by solving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The spectrum σ(L) associated with the linear operator in (10) for (a) µ < 0, (b) µ = 0 and (c) µ > 0. An instability arises when σ(L), which is continuous and constrained to the real axis, intersects the right half plane for µ > 0. where ∥v(·)∥Ze = ∥v(·)∥∞ + ∥(1 + | · |)v (1)(·)∥∞ + ∥(1 + (·) 2 )v (2)(·)∥∞. Thus, we are interested in the behaviour of solutions with initial conditions for which the first (second) der… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Geometry of the original (blown-down) space (left), and the blown-up space (right) which is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The spectrum σ(L1) associated with the linear operator L1 defined in (28), evaluated at Q1 := (0, 0, 0). The stable spectrum σ−(L1) is continuous and bounded below −1, and the center spectrum σ0(L1) = {0} has an associated 2-dimensional center subspace E0 which is span…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sketch of the important objects appearing in the local analysis in charts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The 2-dimensional manifold Ma 2 described in Lemma 4.18 provides a connection between the local center manifolds Ma 1 and Ma 3 (which as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    V. F. Butuzov, N. N. Nefedov, and K. R. Schneider , Singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion systems in cases of exchange of stabilities, Natural Resource Modeling, 13 (2000), pp. 247–269

    work page 2000

  2. [1]

    A. Asch, M. A very, A. Cortez, and A. Scheel , Slow passage through the Busse balloon– predicting steps on the Eckhaus staircase, European Journal of Applied Mathematics, (2024), pp. 1– 26

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    A vitabile, M

    D. A vitabile, M. Desroches, R. Veltz, and M. Wechselberger , Local theory for spatio- temporal canards and delayed bifurcations, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 52 (2020), pp. 5703–5747

    work page 2020

  4. [3]

    Benoit, Dynamic bifurcations: Proceedings of a conference held in Luminy, France, March 5-10, 1990, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991

    E. Benoit, Dynamic bifurcations: Proceedings of a conference held in Luminy, France, March 5-10, 1990, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991

    work page 1990

  5. [4]

    Bricmont and A

    J. Bricmont and A. Kupiainen , Renormalizing partial differential equations, in Constructive Physics Results in Field Theory, Statistical Mechanics and Condensed Matter Physics, Springer, 1995, pp. 83–115

    work page 1995

  6. [5]

    Butuzov, Singularly perturbed parabolic equation in the case of intersecting roots of the degen- erate equation, Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, 9 (2002), pp

    V. Butuzov, Singularly perturbed parabolic equation in the case of intersecting roots of the degen- erate equation, Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, 9 (2002), pp. 50–59

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    Butuzov and I

    V. Butuzov and I. Smurov , Initial boundary value problem for a singularly perturbed parabolic equation in case of exchange of stability, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 234 (1999), pp. 183–192

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    , Singularly perturbed elliptic problems in the case of exchange of stabilities, Journal of Differ- ential Equations, 169 (2001), pp. 373–395. 35

    work page 2001

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    , Singularly perturbed partly dissipative reaction–diffusion systems in case of exchange of sta- bilities, Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 273 (2002), pp. 217–235

    2002

  2. [10]

    S. J. Chapman, M. Ka vousanakis, I. Kevrekidis, and P. Kevrekidis , Normal form for the onset of collapse: The prototypical example of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Physical Review E, 104 (2021), p. 044202

    2021

  3. [11]

    Collet and J.-P

    P. Collet and J.-P. Eckmann , The time dependent amplitude equation for the Swift-Hohenberg problem, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 132 (1990), pp. 139–153

    1990

  4. [12]

    De Maesschalck, F

    P. De Maesschalck, F. Dumortier, and R. Roussarie , Canard Cycles, Springer, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    De Maesschalck, T

    P. De Maesschalck, T. J. Kaper, and N. Popović , Canards and bifurcation delays of spa- tially homogeneous and inhomogeneous types in reaction-diffusion equations, AdvancesinDifferential Equations, 14 (2009), pp. 943–962

    2009

  6. [14]

    Dumortier and R

    F. Dumortier and R. Roussarie , Canard cycles and center manifolds, no. 577 in Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, American Mathematical Society, 1996

    1996

  7. [15]

    Engel, F

    M. Engel, F. Hummel, and C. Kuehn , Connecting a direct and a Galerkin approach to slow manifolds in infinite dimensions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Series B, 8 (2021), pp. 252–266

    2021

  8. [16]

    Engel, F

    M. Engel, F. Hummel, C. Kuehn, N. Popović, M. Ptashnyk, and T. Zacharis , Geometric analysis of fast-slow PDEs with fold singularities via Galerkin discretisation, Nonlinearity, 37 (2024), p. 115017

    2024

  9. [17]

    Engel and C

    M. Engel and C. Kuehn , Blow-up analysis of fast-slow PDEs with loss of hyperbolicity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09973, (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations, Journal of Differential Equations, 31 (1979), pp

    N. Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations, Journal of Differential Equations, 31 (1979), pp. 53–98

    1979

  11. [19]

    R. Goh, T. J. Kaper, and A. Scheel , Pitchfork bifurcation along a slow parameter ramp: Coherent structures in the critical scaling, Studies in Applied Mathematics, (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    R. Goh, T. J. Kaper, A. Scheel, and T. Vo , Fronts in the wake of a parameter ramp: slow passage through pitchfork and fold bifurcations, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 22 (2023), pp. 2312–2356

    2023

  13. [21]

    R. Goh, T. J. Kaper, and T. Vo , Delayed Hopf bifurcation and space–time buffer curves in the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 87 (2022), pp. 131–186

    2022

  14. [22]

    Haberman, Slowly varying jump and transition phenomena associated with algebraic bifurcation problems, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 37 (1979), pp

    R. Haberman, Slowly varying jump and transition phenomena associated with algebraic bifurcation problems, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 37 (1979), pp. 69–106

    1979

  15. [23]

    Haragus and G

    M. Haragus and G. Iooss , Local bifurcations, center manifolds, and normal forms in infinite- dimensional dynamical systems, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

    2010

  16. [24]

    M. G. Hayes, T. J. Kaper, P. Szmolyan, and M. Wechselberger , Geometric desingular- ization of degenerate singularities in the presence of fast rotation: A new proof of known results for slow passage through Hopf bifurcations, Indagationes Mathematicae, 27 (2016), pp. 1184–1203

    2016

  17. [25]

    Henry, Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, vol

    D. Henry, Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, vol. 840, Springer, 1981

    1981

  18. [26]

    Hummel, S

    F. Hummel, S. Jelbart, and C. Kuehn , Geometric blow-up of a dynamic Turing instability in the Swift-Hohenberg equation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.03967, (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Jardón-Kojakhmetov and C

    H. Jardón-Kojakhmetov and C. Kuehn , A survey on the blow-up method for fast-slow systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.01402, (2019). 36

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Jelbart and C

    S. Jelbart and C. Kuehn , A formal geometric blow-up method for pattern forming systems, in Topics in Multiple Time Scale Dynamics, M. Engel, H. Jardón-Kojakhmetov, and C. Soresina, eds., vol. 806 of Contemporary Mathematics, AMS, 2024, pp. 49–86

    2024

  21. [29]

    C. K. Jones , Geometric singular perturbation theory, in Dynamical systems, vol. 1609 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, 1995, pp. 44–118

    1995

  22. [30]

    T. J. Kaper and T. Vo , Delayed loss of stability due to the slow passage through Hopf bifurcations in reaction–diffusion equations, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 28 (2018), p. 091103

    2018

  23. [31]

    Kevrekidis, S

    P. Kevrekidis, S. Kumar, and I. Kevrekidis , An exploding glass?, Physics Letters A, 318 (2003), pp. 364–372

    2003

  24. [32]

    Kirrmann, G

    P. Kirrmann, G. Schneider, and A. Mielke , The validity of modulation equations for ex- tended systems with cubic nonlinearities, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics, 122 (1992), pp. 85–91

    1992

  25. [33]

    Krupa and P

    M. Krupa and P. Szmolyan , Extending geometric singular perturbation theory to nonhyperbolic points—fold and canard points in two dimensions, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 33 (2001), pp. 286–314

    2001

  26. [34]

    , Extending slow manifolds near transcritical and pitchfork singularities, Nonlinearity, 14 (2001), p. 1473

    2001

  27. [35]

    , Relaxation oscillation and canard explosion, Journal of Differential Equations, 174 (2001), pp. 312–368

    2001

  28. [36]

    Kuehn, PDE Dynamics: An introduction, vol

    C. Kuehn, PDE Dynamics: An introduction, vol. 23, SIAM, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Martinez Sanchez , Slow passage through bifurcations in fast reactions, Master’s thesis, The Technical University of Munich, 2024

    A. Martinez Sanchez , Slow passage through bifurcations in fast reactions, Master’s thesis, The Technical University of Munich, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations, vol

    A. Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations, vol. 44, Springer Science & Business Media, 1983

    1983

  31. [39]

    Sandstede, Stability of travelling waves, in Handbook of dynamical systems, vol

    B. Sandstede, Stability of travelling waves, in Handbook of dynamical systems, vol. 2, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 983–1055

    2002

  32. [40]

    Schneider and H

    G. Schneider and H. Uecker , Nonlinear PDEs, vol. 182, American Mathematical Society, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    Siettos, I

    C. Siettos, I. Kevrekidis, and P. Kevrekidis , Focusing revisited: A renormaliza- tion/bifurcation approach, Nonlinearity, 16 (2003), p. 497

    2003

  34. [42]

    Szmolyan and M

    P. Szmolyan and M. Wechselberger , Canards in R3, Journal of Differential Equations, 177 (2001), pp. 419–453

    2001

  35. [43]

    , Relaxation oscillations inR3, Journal of Differential Equations, 200 (2004), pp. 69–104

    2004

  36. [44]

    Tsubota, C

    T. Tsubota, C. Liu, B. Foster, and E. Knobloch , Bifurcation delay and front propagation in the real ginzburg-landau equation on a time-dependent domain, Physical Review E, 109 (2024), p. 044210

    2024

  37. [45]

    V anderbauwhede and G

    A. V anderbauwhede and G. Iooss, Center manifold theory in infinite dimensions, in Dynamics Reported, Springer, 1992, pp. 125–163

    1992

  38. [46]

    Wechselberger, A propos de canards (apropos canards), Transactions of the American Math- ematical Society, 364 (2012), pp

    M. Wechselberger, A propos de canards (apropos canards), Transactions of the American Math- ematical Society, 364 (2012), pp. 3289–3309

    2012

  39. [47]

    Wiggins , Normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds in dynamical systems, vol

    S. Wiggins , Normally hyperbolic invariant manifolds in dynamical systems, vol. 105, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, 2013

    2013

  40. [48]

    Zacharis, Geometric singular perturbation theory for reaction-diffusion systems, PhD thesis, 2023

    T. Zacharis, Geometric singular perturbation theory for reaction-diffusion systems, PhD thesis, 2023. 37

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.