Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 133 references

High-Fidelity Optical Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion via Aperture Division Multiplexing

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single lens focuses the process laser and images melt-pool pores as small as 4.3 microns.

desk verdict The ADM optic is a real and well-characterized contribution; the pore-detection rates are in-sample fits that outrun the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13703 v1 pith:O2OTU2QH submitted 2024-11-20 physics.optics

Ryan W. Penny , Zachery Kutschke , A. John Hart This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords laserpowderbedfusionaperturedivisionmultiplexingprocessmonitoringporositydetectionmid-waveinfraredmicro-CTfatiguequalificationin-situsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that aperture division multiplexing (ADM) — splitting one lens into separate optical paths for the process laser and for an infrared camera — can give laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) an unobstructed, on-axis view of the melt pool at 50-micron resolution. Using a production-representative testbed, the authors record high-speed mid-wave infrared video during a stainless-steel build and compare four process signatures against micro-CT ground truth. They report that voids as small as 4.3 microns, the size range implicated in fatigue-crack nucleation, are detected by low time-above-threshold or low cooling-rate alarms after modest spatial dilation, with false-alarm rates of a few percent to 14 percent. If this holds, in-process optical monitoring could qualify LPBF components for fatigue-limited service without relying on downstream computed tomography.

What carries the argument

The central object is the aperture division multiplexing (ADM) lens: a single optical assembly in which the clear aperture is split into a laser-delivery path and an imaging path, each decentered by 17.5 millimeters, so one optic simultaneously focuses the process beam and forms a diffraction-limited mid-wave infrared image of the build plane. A lens form with four positive calcium-fluoride elements and two negative fused-silica elements controls chromatic aberration across the 1.2–2.4-micron sensing band, and an f/2.3 cold-stop camera with an indium-antimonide detector records the scene. The argument is carried by this shared-aperture layout plus a signature-extraction pipeline that reduces each pixel's time series to alarms, then registers those alarms to micro-CT via mutual-information alignment and scores detection probability as a function of void size.

What would settle it

Print a separate component with a different geometry or process parameters, apply the exact thresholds and dilation counts reported here (e.g., 4000 counts, 8 ms and 64 ms, $0.1\ \mathrm{ms}^{-1}$, 5000 and 6000 counts), and compare the resulting alarms to micro-CT: if detection probability collapses to near chance or false alarms dominate, the in-sample statistics do not generalize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that aperture division multiplexing erases the usual trade-off between delivering a 1.07-micron process laser and imaging the melt pool: a single lens, with two decentered optical paths sharing calcium-fluoride and fused-silica elements, focuses the laser to a 77-micron spot while a mid-wave infrared camera looks through the same optic at 50-micron geometric resolution. On a custom LPBF testbed printing 316 stainless steel, the camera ran at 1250 frames per second with 0.7-microsecond exposures, and per-pixel process signatures — time above threshold, maximum radiance, meltpool area, and cooling rate — were registered to micro-CT voxels of 4.3 microns. Pore-by-pore statistics show that after two or three dilations of the alarm volume, roughly 77 to 80 percent of resolved voids are caught by low time-above-threshold or low cooling-rate alarms, rising to 98.9 percent for the high time-above-threshold signature at a 14 percent false-alarm cost. The paper concludes that this detection scale reaches below the minimum pore sizes reported to nucleate fatigue cracks in common LPBF alloys, establishing the promise of ADM for qualification of component fatigue performance.

Load-bearing premise

The detection probabilities treat alarm thresholds and dilation counts chosen by looking at this same test print as fixed criteria that will work on unseen builds; if those thresholds were tuned to this artifact, the reported rates do not yet prove predictive performance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ADM provides coaxial optical access to the melt pool without the barrel distortion and chromatic aberration that f-theta lenses impose on monitoring wavelengths.
  • The demonstrated detection of voids at 4.3 microns reaches below the 34–52-micron pore sizes reported to nucleate fatigue cracks in Ti-6Al-4V, so alarm maps from this method could tighten fatigue-life bounds for LPBF parts.
  • Because the four process signatures respond to different phenomena (e.g., slow cooling versus sustained overheating), combining them is expected to outperform any single alarm channel.
  • The authors' identified upgrades — smaller detector pixels, a longer camera focal length, and alternative infrared materials — point toward roughly 10-micron feature resolution and frame rates approaching the 1.4-MHz exposure limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported detection statistics are computed on the same build that was used to choose alarm thresholds, so the decisive follow-up is a blind test on an unseen component with thresholds fixed in advance.
  • Because the 4.3-micron floor is the micro-CT voxel size, the optical system may resolve even smaller pores; confirming this would require a higher-resolution ground truth such as synchrotron tomography.
  • The same shared-aperture idea could extend to synchronized multi-laser LPBF, where overlapping f-theta scan fields are normally limited to a narrow stripe; ADM-style split apertures might allow coordinated beams across the full build area.
  • Cooling-rate signatures, if they track local thermal history, may later be correlatable to residual stress and microstructure, though that correlation is not shown in this paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents aperture division multiplexing (ADM) as an optical architecture for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), in which one lens provides two optical paths: one for focusing the 1.07 µm process laser and one for high-resolution mid-wave infrared monitoring. The authors design, build, and characterize an ADM lens, reporting a measured D86 laser spot of 77 µm and a measured slanted-edge MTF consistent with the optical model. They demonstrate the system on a custom LPBF testbed by printing a 5×5×6 mm 316L artifact, obtaining 1250 Hz MWIR video, and registering the video-derived process signatures to micro-CT ground truth with 4.3 µm voxels. From this single build, they report pore detection probabilities for time-above-threshold, maximum radiance, meltpool size, and cooling-rate signatures, claiming correlation with pores as small as 4.3 µm and detection rates around 77–80% after dilation at false-alarm rates of 3–14%.

Significance. The ADM optical concept is a meaningful and credible contribution to LPBF process monitoring. It directly addresses the known difficulties of on-axis monitoring through f-theta lenses, and the hardware claim is independently validated: the measured 77 µm laser spot closely matches the design encircled energy, the slanted-edge MTF is consistent with the as-built model, and the tolerance analysis supports manufacturability. The paper provides a technically detailed and reproducible optical design. The pore-detection statistics, however, are not yet predictive evidence for unseen builds: the thresholds and dilation counts are selected on the same artifact used to compute the detection probabilities, and the '4.3 µm pore' claim is a proximity statement relative to dilated alarm regions rather than resolved localization. The work therefore stands as a strong proof-of-concept whose central quantitative claim needs reframing or held-out validation before it can support the qualification promise in the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, §3.5, Figs. 6–7] The detection probabilities in Figs. 6 and 7 are in-sample estimates because the alarm thresholds (4000 counts, 8 ms, 64 ms, 0.1 ms^-1, 5000 counts, 6000 counts) and the dilation counts were selected from the same artifact used to compute the statistics. Section 3.3 states directly that the 4000-count threshold 'was chosen from a casual inspection of the video data,' and Section 3.5 applies dilation after the fact to improve detection. With the same data used both to set these parameters and to evaluate them, the reported 77–80% detection with 3–14% false alarms are optimism-biased upper bounds for a new build. The manuscript should either evaluate fixed criteria on a held-out build or use a cross-validation scheme within this build, report the parameter selection protocol, and provide confidence intervals for the detection probabilities.
  2. [§3.5, Figs. 6–7] The dilation procedure makes the '4.3 µm pore detection' claim misleading as stated. With 50 µm process-signature voxels, one dilation expands an alarm by one voxel in each direction and two dilations create a roughly 250 µm neighborhood around the original alarm; three dilations are still larger. A pore of diameter 4.3–50 µm is therefore counted as detected when it lies anywhere inside this dilated region, not when the pore is resolved or localized. The paper should report the correspondence before dilation (e.g., overlap or centroid distance between pores and undilated alarms) and should phrase the claim in terms of correlation at the scale of the alarm neighborhood unless such localization data are provided.
  3. [§3.5 (limitations paragraph), §4] The generalization to LPBF qualification is not yet supported by the reported single-build experiment. The authors themselves note that balling is the predominant porosity source, that the process parameters are near the edge of the process window, and that one region of the artifact is 98.7% dense; only one material, one geometry, one parameter set, and one print are tested. This does not weaken the ADM optical demonstration, but the abstract's 'promise for qualification of LPBF component fatigue performance' should be scaled back to a proof-of-concept correlation in a balling-dominated artifact until keyhole and lack-of-fusion porosity regimes and additional builds are evaluated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2.1] The notation '1.2− 2.4+ µm' is unclear; it should be '1.2–2.4 µm' or the intended spectral band should be stated explicitly.
  2. [§3.1] The text refers to MTF curves as appearing in Fig. 3b, but Fig. 3b is captioned as spot diagrams; the MTF discussion appears to correspond to Fig. 4b. Please correct the cross-reference.
  3. [§S2.1, §S2.4] 'has operands operands for' is a typo in §S2.1, and 'preformed' in §S2.4 should be 'performed'.
  4. [§3.5, Figs. 6–7] The definition of 'false alarm' would be clearer if the denominator were stated (alarms total versus alarm voxels total) and if the relationship between the quoted 6% and 14% false-alarm figures and the curves in Figs. 6–7 were made explicit.
  5. [References, near [25]] The text 'Rayleigh-Tailor meltpool instabilities' should read 'Rayleigh-Taylor'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Pore-detection statistics are in-sample: alarm thresholds and dilation counts are chosen from the same build, making the 77-80% detection rates fitted performance rather than independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.3 'Process Signatures'; Figs. 6-7 detection statistics]
    "The 4000 count value was chosen from a casual inspection of the video data, like many other parameters in these routines."

    This sentence admits that the alarm thresholds used to define process-signature alarms (4000 counts; also 8 ms, 64 ms, 0.1 ms^-1, 5000 counts, 6000 counts) were selected by inspecting the same video data from which the alarm maps are built. The detection probabilities in Figs. 6-7 are then computed against micro-CT pores of the same build. Because no held-out data or cross-validation is used, the reported 77-80% detection and 3-14% false-alarm rates are in-sample performance of thresholds tuned to this artifact, not independent predictions of pore presence.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.5 'Pore Detection Statistics'; Figs. 6-7]
    "Allowing for a slight difference in the position of the void and signature by dilating the signature twice greatly improves performance: more than 80% of all voids are detected. ... with two dilations again shows the ability to detect roughly 77% of the voids resolved in the micro-CT ground truth."

    The number of dilations (two or three) is chosen post hoc because it increases the detected-pore rate on this same build. A dilation expands a 50 um signature voxel into a multi-voxel neighborhood of roughly 250 um after two dilations, so 'detected' is defined as overlap with a dilated alarm blob rather than a fixed pre-specified localization rule. The reported detection rates are therefore a function of a parameter selected on the evaluation data, and the 4.3 um pore claim reflects CT voxel resolution plus proximity to a dilated alarm, not an independent optical localization of the pore.

full rationale

The ADM hardware claim is not circular: the laser spot D86 of 77 um and the measured MTF are benchmarked against design models and slanted-edge tests, and the tolerance analysis is independent of the pore-detection result. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears; the few self-references are to theses for testbed details and a preliminary recurrence analysis, neither of which determines the central detection claim. The circularity is confined to the pore-detection statistics. Section 3.3 states that the 4000-count threshold was chosen from casual inspection of the video data, 'like many other parameters in these routines,' and those same alarm definitions are then used to compute detection probabilities against micro-CT pores in the same build. Section 3.5 adds spatial dilation post hoc because it greatly improves performance, with the dilation count again selected on the same artifact. Thus the reported 77-80% detection rates and 3-14% false-alarm rates are in-sample, tuned-criterion results rather than held-out predictions. The paper itself notes that balling dominates the porosity and that the process parameters sit near the edge of the process window, further limiting generalization, though that limitation is not itself circularity. Because the central 'predictive power' claim is statistically forced by the parameter choices, a score of 6 is appropriate; the externally benchmarked optics and the presence of genuine, if in-sample, correlation keep the paper from being a fully self-referential derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central detection claim depends on a set of alarm thresholds and dilation counts chosen from the same dataset, plus assumptions that micro-CT ground truth, causal signature-pore links, and registration are valid. The ADM lens performance itself is externally validated and does not depend on these free parameters.

free parameters (8)
  • Time above threshold alarm threshold (low) = 8 ms
    Chosen to define low-time alarms; selection from the same dataset is not independently validated (Fig. 6a).
  • Time above threshold alarm threshold (high) = 64 ms
    High-time alarms for balling-type defects; tuned to the same dataset (Fig. 6b).
  • Cooling rate alarm threshold = 0.1 ms^-1
    Low cooling rate alarms; threshold from the same dataset (Fig. 7).
  • Radiance threshold for cooling peak selection = 6000 counts
    Peak selection criterion for cooling rate; chosen from data (Section 3.3).
  • Radiance threshold for meltpool area = 5000 counts
    Meltpool area at last melting event threshold; chosen from data (Section 3.3).
  • Alarm dilation count = 0 to 3 per signature
    Alarm dilation iterations applied post hoc to improve detection probability; different counts per signature selected for best results (Section 3.5, Figs. 6-7).
  • Maximum radiance alarm threshold (high) = 8000 counts
    High-threshold alarm for maximum radiance in Fig. S2; chosen post hoc.
  • Meltpool size alarm threshold (high) = 15 px
    High-threshold alarm for meltpool size in Fig. S3; chosen post hoc.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Micro-CT with 4.3 µm voxels and modified Otsu thresholding correctly identifies true porosity in the test artifact.
    Ground truth for all pore detection statistics; single-voxel thresholded features may be noise or beam-hardening artifacts (Sections 2.5, 3.5).
  • domain assumption The process signatures (time above threshold, maximum radiance, meltpool area, cooling rate) are causally related to underlying porosity.
    Detection statistics assume alarms from these signatures mark pores; the causal link is hypothesized, not proven (Section 3.3).
  • standard math Mutual-information registration with Powell optimization correctly aligns camera and micro-CT coordinate frames.
    If registration is biased, pore-alarm correspondence is invalid; alignment uses blobby data and a fiducial chamfer (Section 3.4).
  • domain assumption The bespoke testbed and chosen print parameters are representative of production LPBF.
    The authors call it production-representative, but the artifact is small (5x5x6 mm) and printed near the edge of the process window (Sections 2.1, 3.5).
  • domain assumption Zemax models with as-built dimensions and materials predict imaging performance accurately enough for the 50 µm resolution claim.
    This is partially validated by the measured 77 µm laser spot and slanted-edge MTF (Section 3.1.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Fidelity Optical Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion via Aperture Division Multiplexing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O2OTU2QH

@misc{pith2026241113703,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Fidelity Optical Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion via Aperture Division Multiplexing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O2OTU2QH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13703}
}
read the original abstract

Qualification of high-performance metal components produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) must identify process-induced porous defects that reduce ductility and nucleate fatigue cracking. Detecting such defects via optical monitoring of LPBF provides a path towards in-process quality control without downstream testing such as by computed tomography. However, integration of in-process sensing with LPBF is hampered by geometric and optical complications and, as a result, it has yet to be proven that the finest pores that limit component fatigue life can be resolved via in situ data. We present aperture division multiplexing (ADM) as a method for simultaneously focusing the process laser and providing unobstructed optical access for high-fidelity process monitoring using a common optic. Construction of an ADM optic of achieving imaging at 50 micron spatial resolution in the mid-wave infrared is described, and this optic is demonstrated on a production-representative LPBF testbed. High-speed infrared video data are correlated to micro-CT measurement of pores as fine as 4.3 microns, through multiple process signatures, establishing the promise of ADM for qualification of LPBF component fatigue performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13703 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of minimum detectable pore size reported for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Laser powder bed fusion using an ADM optic. (a) Schematic illustration of ADM, showing optical paths for both laser delivery and process monitoring [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spot diagrams for the ADM lens design. (a) Spot diagram for three representative fields for laser light delivered to the build plane. (b) Spot diagram for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of simulated and measured ADM lens performance. (a) Plot of encircled energy, showing that the as-measured D86 (laser spot size) is 77 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Products resulting from the fabrication of the test artifact. (a) As-built image of the test artifact prepared for micro-CT. (b) Representative slice of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Detection probabilities using time above threshold as a process signature. (a) A low threshold ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detection probabilities using rate as a low-threshold ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    International, Wholers report, Tech

    A. International, Wholers report, Tech. rep., ASTM International (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    S. K. Everton, M. Hirsch, P. Stravroulakis, R. K. Leach, A. T. Clare, Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing, Materials & Design 95 (2016) 431 – 445. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0264127516300995

    doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 2016

  3. [3]

    Grasso, V

    M. Grasso, V . Laguzza, Q. Semeraro, B. M. Colosimo, In-Process Moni- toring of Selective Laser Melting: Spatial Detection of Defects Via Image Data Analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 139 (5) (11 2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    McCann, M

    R. McCann, M. A. Obeidi, C. Hughes, ´Eanna McCarthy, D. S. Egan, R. K. Vijayaraghavan, A. M. Joshi, V . Acinas Garzon, D. P. Dowling, P. J. McNally, D. Brabazon, In-situ sensing, process monitoring and machine control in laser powder bed fusion: A review, Additive Manufactur- ing 45 (2021) 102058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma. 2021.102058. URL http...

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    C. Chua, Y . Liu, R. J. Williams, C. K. Chua, S. L. Sing, In-process and post-process strategies for part quality assessment in metal powder bed fusion: A review, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 73 (2024) 75–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.01.004. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0278612524000049

    doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.01.004 2024

  6. [6]

    Seifi, A

    M. Seifi, A. Salem, J. Beuth, O. Harrysson, J. Lewandowski, Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing., JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS) 68 (3) (2016) 747 – 764. URL http://libproxy.mit.edu/login?url=https: //search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.mit.edu:9443/login. aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cooki...

    2016

  7. [7]

    Zhang, Y

    B. Zhang, Y . Li, Q. Bai, Defect formation mechanisms in selective laser melting: A review, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 30 (3) (2017) 515–527. doi:10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5

    doi:10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5 2017

  8. [8]

    du Plessis, I

    A. du Plessis, I. Yadroitsava, I. Yadroitsev, E ffects of defects on me- chanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A review focusing on x-ray tomography insights, Materials & Design (2019) 108385doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108385. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0264127519308238

    arXiv 2019

Show all 133 references
  1. [9]

    Rombouts, L

    M. Rombouts, L. Froyen, A. V . Gusarov, E. H. Bentefour, C. Glo- rieux, Photopyroelectric measurement of thermal conductivity of metal- lic powders, Journal of Applied Physics 97 (2) (2005) 024905. doi: 10.1063/1.1832740

    2005 doi

  2. [10]

    Meier, R

    C. Meier, R. W. Penny, Y . Zou, J. S. Gibbs, A. J. Hart, Thermophysical phenomena in metal additive manufacturing by selective laser melting: fundamentals, modeling, simulation, and experimentation, Annual Re- view of Heat Transfer 20 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    H. D. Carlton, A. Haboub, G. F. Gallegos, D. Y . Parkinson, A. A. Mac- Dowell, Damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively man- ufactured stainless steel, Materials Science and Engineering: A 651 (2016) 406 – 414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015. 10.073. URL ...

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Nadot, C

    Y . Nadot, C. Nadot-Martin, W. H. Kan, S. Boufadene, M. Foley, J. Cair- ney, G. Proust, L. Ridosz, Predicting the fatigue life of an AlSi10Mg alloy manufactured via selective laser melting by using data from Com- puted Tomography, Additive Manufacturing (2019) 100899doi:https:...

    2019

  5. [13]

    Yadollahi, M

    A. Yadollahi, M. Mahtabi, A. Khalili, H. Doude, J. Newman Jr, Fatigue life prediction of additively manufactured material: E ffects of surface roughness, defect size, and shape, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 41 (7) (2018) 1602–1614

    2018

  6. [15]

    Blakey-Milner, P

    B. Blakey-Milner, P. Gradl, G. Snedden, M. Brooks, J. Pitot, E. Lopez, M. Leary, F. Berto, A. du Plessis, Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review, Materials & Design 209 (2021) 110008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008. URL https://www.sciencedirect...

    2021

  7. [16]

    Gruber, P

    K. Gruber, P. Szymczyk-Zi´ołkowska, S. Dziuba, S. Duda, P. Zielonka, S. Seitl, G. Lesiuk, Fatigue crack growth characterization of Inconel 718 after additive manufacturing by laser powder bed fusion and heat treatment, International Journal of Fatigue 166 (2023) 107287. doi: h...

    2023

  8. [17]

    A. D. Lam, G. P. Duffy, Early Tibial Component Fractures in a Cement- less, 3D-Printed, Titanium Implant, Arthroplasty Today 18 (2022) 31–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.08.002. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2352344122001728

    2022 doi

  9. [19]

    Kasperovich, J

    G. Kasperovich, J. Haubrich, J. Gussone, G. Requena, Correlation between porosity and processing parameters in TiAl6V4 produced by selective laser melting, Materials & Design 105 (2016) 160–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.070

    2016 doi

  10. [20]

    W. E. King, H. D. Barth, V . M. Castillo, G. F. Gallegos, J. W. Gibbs, D. E. Hahn, C. Kamath, A. M. Rubenchik, Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing, Jour- nal of Materials Processing Technology 214 (12) (2014) 2915 – 2925....

    2014 doi

  11. [21]

    J. Ye, S. A. Khairallah, A. M. Rubenchik, M. F. Crumb, G. Guss, J. Belak, M. J. Matthews, Energy coupling mechanisms and scaling behavior associated with laser powder bed fusion additive manu- facturing, Advanced Engineering Materials 21 (7) (2019) 1900185. arXiv:https://onlin...

    2019 doi

  12. [22]

    Kouraytem, X

    N. Kouraytem, X. Li, R. Cunningham, C. Zhao, N. Parab, T. Sun, A. D. Rollett, A. D. Spear, W. Tan, Effect of laser-matter interaction on molten pool flow and keyhole dynamics, Phys. Rev. Applied 11 (2019) 064054. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064054. URL https://link.aps.org/d...

    2019 doi

  13. [23]

    N. P. Calta, J. Wang, A. M. Kiss, A. A. Martin, P. J. Depond, G. M. Guss, V . Thampy, A. Y . Fong, J. N. Weker, K. H. Stone, C. J. Tassone, M. J. Kramer, M. F. Toney, A. Van Buuren, M. J. Matthews, An instrument for in situ time-resolved x-ray imaging and diffraction of laser ...

    2018 doi

  14. [24]

    Calta, P

    N. Calta, P. Collins, A. Martin, M. Matthews, J. N. Weker, R. Ott, K. Stone, C. Tassone, In-situ data acquisition and tool development for additive manufacturing metal powder systems, Tech. rep., SLAC National Accelerator Lab (3 2019). doi:10.2172/1505627

    2019 doi

  15. [26]

    Cunningham, A

    R. Cunningham, A. Nicolas, J. Madsen, E. Fodran, E. Anagnostou, M. D. Sangid, A. D. Rollett, Analyzing the e ffects of powder and post-processing on porosity and properties of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V, Materials Research Letters 5 (7) (2017) 516–525. doi: 10.1080/2166383...

    2017

  16. [27]

    Tammas-Williams, P

    S. Tammas-Williams, P. Withers, I. Todd, P. Prangnell, Porosity regrowth during heat treatment of hot isostatically pressed additively manufactured titanium components, Scripta Materialia 122 (2016) 72–76. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.05.002. URL https://www....

    2016 doi

  17. [28]

    Leuders, M

    S. Leuders, M. Th ¨one, A. Riemer, T. Niendorf, T. Tr¨oster, H. Richard, H. Maier, On the mechanical behaviour of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting: Fatigue resistance and crack growth performance, International Journal of Fatigue 48 (2013) 300–307...

    2013 doi

  18. [29]

    Mercelis, J.-P

    P. Mercelis, J.-P. Kruth, Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting, Rapid Prototyping Journal 12 (10 2006). doi:10.1108/13552540610707013

    2006 doi

  19. [30]

    J. L. Bartlett, X. Li, An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion, Additive Manufacturing 27 (2019) 131–149. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.020. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S221486041930051X

    2019 doi

  20. [31]

    Bhandari, V

    L. Bhandari, V . Gaur, On study of process induced defects-based fa- tigue performance of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy, Additive Manufacturing 60 (2022) 103227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.addma.2022.103227. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2...

    2022

  21. [32]

    Ronneberg, C

    T. Ronneberg, C. M. Davies, P. A. Hooper, Revealing relationships be- tween porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties of laser pow- der bed fusion 316l stainless steel through heat treatment, Materials & Design 189 (2020) 108481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matdes....

    2020

  22. [33]

    E. W. Jost, J. C. Miers, A. Robbins, D. G. Moore, C. Saldana, E ffects of spatial energy distribution-induced porosity on mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion 316l stainless steel, Additive Manufactur- ing 39 (2021) 101875. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma. 2021...

    2021

  23. [34]

    Fiocchi, A

    J. Fiocchi, A. Tuissi, C. Biffi, Heat treatment of aluminium alloys pro- duced by laser powder bed fusion: A review, Materials & Design 204 (2021) 109651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021. 109651. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0264127521002045

    2021 doi

  24. [35]

    Salarian, H

    M. Salarian, H. Asgari, M. Vlasea, Pore space characteristics and corre- sponding effect on tensile properties of Inconel 625 fabricated via laser powder bed fusion, Materials Science and Engineering: A 769 (2020) 138525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138525. URL htt...

    2020

  25. [36]

    Leuders, M

    S. Leuders, M. V ollmer, F. Brenne, T. Tr ¨oster, T. Niendorf, Fatigue strength prediction for titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting, Metallurgical and materials transactions A 46 (2015) 3816– 3823

    2015

  26. [37]

    P. Li, D. Warner, J. Pegues, M. Roach, N. Shamsaei, N. Phan, Inves- tigation of the mechanisms by which hot isostatic pressing improves the fatigue performance of powder bed fused Ti-6Al-4V, International Journal of Fatigue 120 (2019) 342–352. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ij...

    2019

  27. [38]

    Masuo, Y

    H. Masuo, Y . Tanaka, S. Morokoshi, H. Yagura, T. Uchida, Y . Ya- mamoto, Y . Murakami, Effects of Defects, Surface Roughness and HIP on Fatigue Strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by Additive Manu- facturing, Procedia Structural Integrity 7 (2017) 19–26, 3rd Interna- tional Sy...

    2017 doi

  28. [39]

    Zhang, C.-N

    M. Zhang, C.-N. Sun, X. Zhang, J. Wei, D. Hardacre, H. Li, Predictive models for fatigue property of laser powder bed fusion stainless steel 316l, Materials & Design 145 (2018) 42–54. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.054. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/...

    2018 doi

  29. [41]

    Pessard, M

    E. Pessard, M. Lavialle, P. Laheurte, P. Didier, M. Brochu, High-cycle fatigue behavior of a laser powder bed fusion additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V titanium: Effect of pores and tested volume size, International Journal of Fatigue 149 (2021) 106206. doi:https://doi.org/10. 10...

    2021

  30. [42]

    Thombansen, A

    U. Thombansen, A. Gatej, M. Pereira, Tracking the course of the manufacturing process in selective laser melting., in: Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 8963rd Edition, V ol. 8963, RWTH Aachen University, Department for Laser Technolo...

    2014

  31. [43]

    Coeck, M

    S. Coeck, M. Bisht, J. Plas, F. Verbist, Prediction of lack of fusion porosity in selective laser melting based on melt pool monitoring data, Additive Manufacturing 25 (2019) 347 – 356. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.015. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/...

    2019 doi

  32. [44]

    Krauss, C

    H. Krauss, C. Eschey, M. Zaeh, Thermography for monitoring the se- lective laser melting process, 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2012 (2012) 999–1014

    2012

  33. [45]

    Clijsters, T

    S. Clijsters, T. Craeghs, S. Buls, K. Kempen, J.-P. Kruth, In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real- time melt pool monitoring system, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 75 (5) (2014) 1089–1101. doi:10....

    2014 doi

  34. [47]

    J. A. Mitchell, T. A. Ivanoff, D. Dagel, J. D. Madison, B. Jared, Link- ing pyrometry to porosity in additively manufactured metals, Additive Manufacturing 31 (2020) 100946. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.addma.2019.100946. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii...

    2020

  35. [48]

    du Plessis, I

    A. du Plessis, I. Yadroitsev, I. Yadroitsava, S. G. Le Roux, X-ray micro- computed tomography in additive manufacturing: A review of the current technology and applications, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 5 (3) (2018) 227–247. doi:10.1089/3dp.2018.0060

    2018

  36. [49]

    NXG II 600, https://www.slm-pushing-the-limits.com/ , ac- cessed: 2024-06-19 (2024)

    2024

  37. [50]

    T. G. Spears, S. A. Gold, In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation 5 (1) (2016) 16–40. doi:10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4 . URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4

    2016 doi

  38. [51]

    Grasso, A

    M. Grasso, A. Remani, A. Dickins, B. M. Colosimo, R. K. Leach, In-situ measurement and monitoring methods for metal powder bed fusion: an updated review, Measurement Science and Technology 32 (11) (2021) 112001. doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ac0b6b. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361...

    2021 doi

  39. [52]

    Zhirnov, I

    I. Zhirnov, I. Yadroitsava, I. Yadroitsev, Optical monitoring and numerical simulation of temperature distribution at selective laser melting of ti6al4v alloy, Materials Science Forum 828-829 (2015) 474 – 481. URL http://libproxy.mit.edu/login?url=http://search. ebscohost.com/...

    2015

  40. [53]

    L. Yang, L. Lo, S. Ding, T. ¨Ozel, Monitoring and detection of meltpool and spatter regions in laser powder bed fusion of super alloy Inconel 625, Progress in Additive Manufacturing 5 (12 2020). doi:10.1007/ s40964-020-00140-8

    2020

  41. [54]

    Scime, J

    L. Scime, J. Beuth, Melt pool geometry and morphology variability for the Inconel 718 alloy in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process, Additive Manufacturing 29 (2019) 100830. doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100830

    2019

  42. [55]

    Le, M.-H

    T.-N. Le, M.-H. Lee, Z.-H. Lin, H.-C. Tran, Y .-L. Lo, Vision-based in-situ monitoring system for melt-pool detection in laser powder bed fusion process, Journal of Manufacturing Processes 68 (2021) 1735–1745. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.07.007. URL https://www.s...

    2021 doi

  43. [56]

    B. Lane, S. Moylan, E. P. Whitenton, L. Ma, Thermographic measure- ments of the commercial laser powder bed fusion process at NIST, Rapid Prototyping Journal 22 (5) (2016) 778–787

    2016

  44. [57]

    M. A. Doubenskaia, I. V . Zhirnov, V . I. Teleshevskiy, P. Bertrand, I. Y . Smurov, Determination of true temperature in selective laser melting of metal powder using infrared camera, Materials Science Forum 834 (2015) 93–102. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.834.93

    2015 doi

  45. [58]

    R. J. Williams, A. Piglione, T. Rønneberg, C. Jones, M.-S. Pham, C. M. Davies, P. A. Hooper, In situ thermography for laser powder bed fusion: Effects of layer temperature on porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties, Additive Manufacturing 30 (2019) 100880. doi:https...

    2019

  46. [59]

    Bruna-Rosso, A

    C. Bruna-Rosso, A. Demir, B. Previtali, Selective laser melting finite element modeling: Validation with high-speed imaging and lack of fusion defects prediction, Materials & Design 156 (2018) 143–153.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.037

    2018 doi

  47. [60]

    S. M. Estalaki, C. S. Lough, R. G. Landers, E. C. Kinzel, T. Luo, Pre- dicting defects in laser powder bed fusion using in-situ thermal imaging data and machine learning, Additive Manufacturing 58 (2022) 103008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103008. URL https://www....

    2022

  48. [62]

    G. Mohr, S. J. Altenburg, A. Ulbricht, P. Heinrich, D. Baum, C. Maier- hofer, K. Hilgenberg, In-situ defect detection in laser powder bed fusion by using thermography and optical tomography—comparison to com- puted tomography, Metals 10 (1) (2020). doi:10.3390/met10010103. URL...

    2020 doi

  49. [63]

    Foster, K

    S. Foster, K. Carver, R. Dinwiddie, F. List, K. Unocic, A. Chaudhary, S. Babu, Process-defect-structure-property correlations during laser pow- der bed fusion of alloy 718: role of in situ and ex situ characterizations, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 49 (11) (2018)...

    2018

  50. [64]

    Heigel, B

    J. Heigel, B. Lane, L. Levine, In Situ Measurements of Melt-Pool Length and Cooling Rate During 3D Builds of the Metal AM-Bench Artifacts, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation (2020-02-20 2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00170-8

    2020 doi

  51. [65]

    Lough, X

    C. Lough, X. Wang, C. Smith, R. Landers, D. Bristow, J. Drallmeier, B. Brown, E. Kinzel, Correlation of SWIR imaging with LPBF 304 L stainless steel part properties, Additive Manufacturing 35 (2020) 101359. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101359

    2020

  52. [66]

    C. S. Lough, T. Liu, X. Wang, B. Brown, R. G. Landers, D. A. Bristow, J. A. Drallmeier, E. C. Kinzel, Local prediction of laser powder bed fusion porosity by short-wave infrared imaging thermal feature porosity probabil- ity maps, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 302...

    2022

  53. [67]

    Furumoto, K

    T. Furumoto, K. Oishi, S. Abe, K. Tsubouchi, M. Yamaguchi, A. T. Clare, Evaluating the thermal characteristics of laser powder bed fusion, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 299 (2022) 117384. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117384. URL https://www.scien...

    2022

  54. [68]

    A. J. Myers, G. Quirarte, F. Ogoke, B. M. Lane, S. Z. Uddin, A. B. Farimani, J. L. Beuth, J. A. Malen, High-resolution melt pool thermal imaging for metals additive manufacturing using the two-color method with a color camera, Additive Manufacturing 73 (2023) 103663. doi: http...

    2023

  55. [69]

    Demir, C

    A. Demir, C. De Giorgi, B. Previtali, Design and Implementa- tion of a Multisensor Coaxial Monitoring System With Correction Strategies for Selective Laser Melting of a Maraging Steel, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 140 (4), 041003 (02 2018). arXiv:https://as...

    2018 doi

  56. [70]

    H. C. de Winton, F. Cegla, P. A. Hooper, A method for objectively evaluating the defect detection performance of in-situ monitoring systems, Additive Manufacturing 48 (2021) 102431. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102431. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...

    2021

  57. [71]

    Yadroitsev, P

    I. Yadroitsev, P. Krakhmalev, I. Yadroitsava, Selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V alloy for biomedical applications: Temperature monitoring and microstructural evolution, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 583 (2014) 404 – 409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08. 183. U...

    2014 doi

  58. [72]

    Vasileska, A

    E. Vasileska, A. G. Demir, B. Colosimo, B. Previtali, Layer-wise con- trol of selective laser melting by means of inline melt pool area mea- surements, Journal of Laser Applications 32 (2020) 022057. doi: 10.2351/7.0000108

    2020 doi

  59. [73]

    J. C. Fox, B. M. Lane, H. Yeung, Measurement of process dynamics through coaxially aligned high speed near-infrared imaging in laser pow- der bed fusion additive manufacturing, in: P. Bison, D. Burleigh (Eds.), 17 Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XXXIX, V ol. 10214, ...

    2017 doi

  60. [74]

    B. Lane, H. Yeung, Process Monitoring Dataset from the Additive Man- ufacturing Metrology Testbed (AMMT): ”Overhang Part X4”, Jour- nal of Research (NIST JRES) 125 (2020-09-03 2020). doi:https: //doi.org/10.6028/jres.125.027

    2020 doi

  61. [75]

    P. A. Hooper, Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion, Additive Manufacturing 22 (2018) 548–559. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.032. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S221486041830188X

    2018 doi

  62. [76]

    H. Ma, Z. Mao, W. Feng, Y . Yang, C. Hao, J. Zhou, S. Liu, H. Xie, G. Guo, Z. Liu, Online in-situ monitoring of melt pool characteristic based on a single high-speed camera in laser powder bed fusion process, Applied Thermal Engineering 211 (2022) 118515. doi:https://doi. org/...

    2022

  63. [77]

    Vecchiato, H

    F. Vecchiato, H. de Winton, P. Hooper, M. Wenman, Melt pool mi- crostructure and morphology from single exposures in laser powder bed fusion of 316l stainless steel, Additive Manufacturing 36 (2020) 101401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101401. URL https://www.scien...

    2020

  64. [78]

    Bisht, N

    M. Bisht, N. Ray, F. Verbist, S. Coeck, Correlation of selective laser melting-melt pool events with the tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V ELI pro- cessed by laser powder bed fusion, Additive Manufacturing 22 (2018) 302 – 306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.004. URL...

    2018 doi

  65. [79]

    A. J. Dunbar, A. R. Nassar, Assessment of optical emission analysis for in-process monitoring of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, Virtual and Physical Prototyping 13 (1) (2018) 14–19. doi:10.1080/ 17452759.2017.1392683

    2018

  66. [80]

    Doubenskaia, M

    M. Doubenskaia, M. Pavlov, Y . Chivel, Optical system for on-line moni- toring and temperature control in selective laser melting technology, in: Measurement Technology and Intelligent Instruments IX, V ol. 437 of Key Engineering Materials, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2010, p...

    2010 doi

  67. [81]

    Pavlov, M

    M. Pavlov, M. Doubenskaia, I. Smurov, Pyrometric analysis of thermal processes in SLM technology, Physics Procedia 5 (2010) 523 – 531, laser Assisted Net Shape Engineering 6, Proceedings of the LANE 2010, Part

    2010

  68. [82]

    URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1875389210005067

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.080. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1875389210005067

    2010 doi

  69. [83]

    I. A. Okaro, S. Jayasinghe, C. Sutcli ffe, K. Black, P. Paoletti, P. L. Green, Automatic fault detection for laser powder-bed fusion using semi- supervised machine learning, Additive Manufacturing 27 (2019) 42 – 53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.006. URL http://w...

    2019 doi

  70. [84]

    Jayasinghe, P

    S. Jayasinghe, P. Paoletti, C. Sutcliffe, J. Dardis, N. Jones, P. L. Green, Automatic quality assessments of laser powder bed fusion builds from photodiode sensor measurements, Progress in Additive Manufacturing 7 (2) (2022) 143–160

    2022

  71. [85]

    Renken, L

    V . Renken, L. L¨ubbert, H. Blom, A. von Freyberg, A. Fischer, Model assisted closed-loop control strategy for selective laser melting, Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 659–663

    2018

  72. [86]

    Renken, A

    V . Renken, A. von Freyberg, K. Sch ¨unemann, F. Pastors, A. Fischer, In-process closed-loop control for stabilising the melt pool temperature in selective laser melting, Progress in Additive Manufacturing (May 2019). doi:10.1007/s40964-019-00083-9 . URL https://doi.org/10.100...

    2019 doi

  73. [87]

    Kruth, Feedback control of selective laser melting, in: Virtual and Rapid Manufacturing, CRC Press, 2007, pp

    J.-P. Kruth, Feedback control of selective laser melting, in: Virtual and Rapid Manufacturing, CRC Press, 2007, pp. 521–528

    2007

  74. [88]

    Craeghs, F

    T. Craeghs, F. Bechmann, S. Berumen, J.-P. Kruth, Feedback control of layerwise laser melting using optical sensors, Physics Procedia 5 (2010) 505 – 514, laser Assisted Net Shape Engineering 6, Proceedings of the LANE 2010, Part 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro. 2010.08....

    2010 doi

  75. [89]

    Craeghs, S

    T. Craeghs, S. Clijsters, E. Yasa, F. Bechmann, S. Berumen, J.-P. Kruth, Determination of geometrical factors in layerwise laser melting using op- tical process monitoring, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 49 (12) (2011) 1440 – 1446. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng. ...

    2011 doi

  76. [91]

    T. Kolb, P. Gebhardt, O. Schmidt, J. Tremel, M. Schmidt, Melt pool monitoring for laser beam melting of metals: assistance for material qualification for the stainless steel 1.4057, Procedia CIRP 74 (2018) 116–121, 10th CIRP Conference on Photonic Technologies LANE 2018. doi:h...

    2018 doi

  77. [92]

    T. Kolb, R. Elahi, J. Seeger, M. Soris, C. Scheitler, O. Hentschel, J. Tremel, M. Schmidt, Camera signal dependencies within coaxial melt pool monitoring in laser powder bed fusion, Rapid Prototyping Journal (2019)

    2019

  78. [93]

    Thombansen, A

    U. Thombansen, A. Gatej, M. Pereira, Process observation in fiber laser based selective laser melting, Optical Engineering 54 (1) (2014) 1 – 7. doi:10.1117/1.OE.54.1.011008. URL https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.54.1.011008

    2014 doi

  79. [94]

    Chivel, I

    Y . Chivel, I. Smurov, Temperature monitoring and overhang layers prob- lem, Physics Procedia 12 (2011) 691 – 696, lasers in Manufacturing 2011 - Proceedings of the Sixth International WLT Conference on Lasers in Manufacturing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011. 03.086....

    2011 doi

  80. [95]

    L. R. Goossens, B. Van Hooreweder, A virtual sensing approach for mon- itoring melt-pool dimensions using high speed coaxial imaging during laser powder bed fusion of metals, Additive Manufacturing 40 (2021) 101923. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101923. URL https://...

    2021

  81. [96]

    Montazeri, P

    M. Montazeri, P. Rao, Sensor-Based Build Condition Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process Using a Spec- tral Graph Theoretic Approach, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 140 (9) (06 2018)

    2018

  82. [97]

    Forien, N

    J.-B. Forien, N. P. Calta, P. J. DePond, G. M. Guss, T. T. Roehling, M. J. Matthews, Detecting keyhole pore defects and monitoring process signa- tures during laser powder bed fusion: A correlation between in situ py- rometry and ex situ x-ray radiography, Additive Manufacturi...

    2020

  83. [98]

    Thanki, L

    A. Thanki, L. Goossens, A. Ompusunggu, M. Bayat, A. Bey-Temsamani, B. Hooreweder, J.-P. Kruth, A. Witvrouw, Melt pool feature analysis using a high-speed coaxial monitoring system for laser powder bed fusion of Ti- 6Al-4 V grade 23, The International Journal of Advanced Manufa...

    2022 doi

  84. [99]

    W. J. Smith, Modern lens design, McGraw-Hill, 2005

    2005

  85. [100]

    S. P. Baker, Design and fabrication of an open-architecture selective laser melting system, Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA (2017)

    2017

  86. [101]

    J. S. Gibbs, Testbeds for quality and porosity control in metal additive manufacturing by selective laser melting, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA (2018)

    2018

  87. [102]

    D. A. Griggs, Design and validation of a high-pressure laser melting sys- tem, Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA (2021)

    2021

  88. [103]

    Z. W. Kutschke, Design and commissioning of a hybrid additive manufac- turing system combining inkjet deposition and laser powder bed fusion, 18 Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2023)

    2023

  89. [104]

    Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9 (1) (1979) 62–66

    N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9 (1) (1979) 62–66. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076

    1979

  90. [105]

    Corning, Corning HPFS 7979, 7980, 8655 Fused Silica, https://www.corning.com/media/worldwide/csm/documents/ HPFS_Product_Brochure_All_Grades_2015_07_21.pdf, ac- cessed: 2023 (2015)

    2015

  91. [106]

    Collignon, F

    A. Collignon, F. Maes, D. Delaere, D. Vandermeulen, P. Suetens, G. Mar- chal, Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (1995)

    1995

  92. [107]

    Harris, M

    C. Harris, M. Stephens, et al., A combined corner and edge detector, Alvey vision conference 15 (50) (1988) 10–5244

    1988

  93. [108]

    D. G. Lowe, Object recognition from local scale-invariant features, in: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, V ol. 2, 1999, pp. 1150–1157 vol.2.doi:10.1109/ICCV.1999. 790410

    1999 doi

  94. [109]

    Viola, W

    P. Viola, W. M. Wells, Alignment by maximization of mutual information, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1995, pp. 16–23. doi:10.1109/ICCV.1995.466930

    1995

  95. [110]

    J. P. W. Pluim, J. B. A. Maintz, M. A. Viergever, Mutual-information- based registration of medical images: a survey, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22 (8) (2003) 986–1004. doi:10.1109/TMI.2003. 815867

    2003 doi

  96. [111]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Polat, Y . Fen...

    2020

  97. [112]

    M. J. Powell, An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives, The computer journal 7 (2) (1964) 155–162

    1964

  98. [113]

    Kasunic, Optical systems engineering, McGraw Hill, 2011

    K. Kasunic, Optical systems engineering, McGraw Hill, 2011

    2011

  99. [114]

    Korsch, Reflective Optics, Academic Press, 1991

    D. Korsch, Reflective Optics, Academic Press, 1991. URL https://books.google.com/books?id=GOCSQgAACAAJ

    1991

  100. [115]

    H. Yan, M. Grasso, K. Paynabar, B. M. Colosimo, Real-time de- tection of clustered events in video-imaging data with applications to additive manufacturing, IISE Transactions 54 (5) (2022) 464–480. doi:10.1080/24725854.2021.1882013

    2022

  101. [116]

    S. A. Billings, Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains, John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    2013

  102. [117]

    Penny, Advanced Instrumentation for Metal Additive Manufacturing, Ph.D

    R. Penny, Advanced Instrumentation for Metal Additive Manufacturing, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (September 2024)

    2024

  103. [118]

    Acharya, J

    R. Acharya, J. A. Sharon, A. Staroselsky, Prediction of microstructure in laser powder bed fusion process, Acta Materialia 124 (2017) 360–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.018. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1359645416308771

    2017 doi

  104. [119]

    K¨ohnen, M

    P. K¨ohnen, M. L ´etang, M. V oshage, J. H. Schleifenbaum, C. Haase, Understanding the process-microstructure correlations for tailoring the mechanical properties of L-PBF produced austenitic advanced high strength steel, Additive Manufacturing 30 (2019) 100914. doi:https: //d...

    2019

  105. [120]

    Leicht, M

    A. Leicht, M. Rashidi, U. Klement, E. Hryha, Effect of process parameters on the microstructure, tensile strength and productivity of 316l parts produced by laser powder bed fusion, Materials Characterization 159 (2020) 110016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019. 11001...

    2020 doi

  106. [121]

    A. S. Wu, D. W. Brown, M. Kumar, G. F. Gallegos, W. E. King, An experimental investigation into additive manufacturing-induced residual stresses in 316l stainless steel, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 45 (13) (2014) 6260–6270. doi:10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x . URL ht...

    2014 doi

  107. [122]

    Cornwell, J

    P. Cornwell, J. Bunn, C. M. Fancher, E. A. Payzant, C. R. Hubbard, Current capabilities of the residual stress di ffractometer at the high flux isotope reactor, Review of Scientific Instruments 89 (9) (2018) 092804. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037593, doi:10. 1063/1.50375...

    2018 doi

  108. [123]

    O. R. N. Laboratory, Hidra high intensity di ffractometer for resid- ual stress analysis, https://neutrons.ornl.gov/sites/default/ files/HIDRA_spec_sheet.pdf, accessed: 12/30/2023 (2021)

    2021

  109. [124]

    Rossini, M

    N. Rossini, M. Dassisti, K. Benyounis, A. Olabi, Methods of measuring residual stresses in components, Materials & Design 35 (2012) 572–588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.022. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0261306911005887

    2012 doi

  110. [125]

    R. E. Smallman, A. H. W. Ngan, Physical metallurgy and advanced materials, 7th Edition, Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdam, 2007

    2007

  111. [126]

    Heeling, K

    T. Heeling, K. Wegener, The effect of multi-beam strategies on selec- tive laser melting of stainless steel 316l, Additive Manufacturing 22 (2018) 334–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018. 05.026. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2214860417303822

    2018 doi

  112. [127]

    H. Wong, K. Dawson, G. Ravi, L. Howlett, R. Jones, C. Sutcliffe, Multi- laser powder bed fusion benchmarking—Initial trials with Inconel 625, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105 (7) (2019) 2891–2906

    2019

  113. [128]

    Tsai, C.-W

    C.-Y . Tsai, C.-W. Cheng, A.-C. Lee, M.-C. Tsai, Synchronized multi-spot scanning strategies for the laser powder bed fusion process, Additive Manufacturing 27 (2019) 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. addma.2019.02.009. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ ...

    2019 doi

  114. [129]

    Cao, Numerical investigation on molten pool dynamics during multi- laser array powder bed fusion process, Metallurgical and Materials Trans- actions A 52 (1) (2021) 211–227

    L. Cao, Numerical investigation on molten pool dynamics during multi- laser array powder bed fusion process, Metallurgical and Materials Trans- actions A 52 (1) (2021) 211–227

    2021

  115. [130]

    C. Chen, Z. Xiao, Y . Wang, X. Yang, H. Zhu, Prediction study on in-situ reduction of thermal stress using combined laser beams in laser powder bed fusion, Additive Manufacturing 47 (2021) 102221

    2021

  116. [131]

    S. Li, J. Yang, Z. Wang, Multi-laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6.5 Al-2Zr- Mo-V alloy powder: Defect formation mechanism and microstructural evolution, Powder Technology 384 (2021) 100–111

    2021

  117. [132]

    K. Wei, F. Li, G. Huang, M. Liu, J. Deng, C. He, X. Zeng, Multi-laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: defect, microstructure, and me- chanical property of overlap region, Materials Science and Engineering: A 802 (2021) 140644

    2021

  118. [133]

    Zhang, W

    W. Zhang, W. M. Abbott, A. Sasnauskas, R. Lupoi, Process parameters optimisation for mitigating residual stress in dual-laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, Metals 12 (3) (2022). doi:10.3390/ met12030420. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/12/3/420

    2022

  119. [134]

    P. Promoppatum, Dual-laser powder bed fusion additive manufactur- ing: computational study of the e ffect of process strategies on thermal and residual stress formations, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2022) 1–15

    2022

  120. [135]

    L. A. Moore, C. M. Smith, Fused silica as an optical material, Opt. Mater. Express 12 (8) (2022) 3043–3059. doi:10.1364/OME.463349. URL https://opg.optica.org/ome/abstract.cfm?URI= ome-12-8-3043

    2022 doi

  121. [136]

    and A.J.H

    Author Contributions R.W.P. and A.J.H. conceptualized ADM, designed the experi- ments, and wrote the manuscript. R.W.P performed the design of the ADM lens, performed the experiments, and analyzed the results. Z.K. contributed to implementation of the LPBF testbed including de...

  122. [137]

    Directing the effective focal length of both configurations, evaluated in both the X and Y directions, to a target value of 125 mm

  123. [138]

    (b) Directing the encircled energies within the stripes ±32.5 µm along each of the X and Y axis to be equal (or that the spots are roughly symmetric)

    For the laser spots corresponding to each field: (a) Directing the encircled energy within a 32.5 µm ra- dius circle to a target value of 86% (or that the D86 is 65 µm). (b) Directing the encircled energies within the stripes ±32.5 µm along each of the X and Y axis to be equal...

  124. [139]

    Minimizing the polychromatic RMS spot size for each field of the imaging path

  125. [140]

    (b) Directing the airspace between element centers to be at least 0 mm (or that the lens element centers cannot overlap)

    For the physical design: (a) Directing the airspace between element edges to be at least 0 mm (or that the lens element edges cannot overlap). (b) Directing the airspace between element centers to be at least 0 mm (or that the lens element centers cannot overlap). (c) Directin...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.