Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Maximizing Quantum Enhancement in Axion Dark Matter Experiments

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Single microwave photon counters, replacing linear amplifiers, make the faintest predicted axion-photon coupling reachable across the entire 1–30 GHz post-inflationary mass range, the paper claims.

desk verdict Useful, honest comparison of amplifier vs photon-counting readout for axion haloscopes; the closed-form SMPD scan rate is a real contribution, but the DFSZ projections silently drop the environmental photon term nγ that the paper itself defines, so the reach plots are optimistic until that term is handled. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13776 v2 pith:45DQB4BY submitted 2024-11-21 hep-ex physics.ins-det

Chao-Lin Kuo , Chelsea L. Bartram , Aaron S. Chou , Taj A. Dyson , Noah A. Kurinsky , Gray Rybka , Sephora Ruppert , Osmond Wen
show 3 more authors
Matthew O. Withers Andrew K. Yi Cheng Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exphysics.ins-det
keywords axiondarkmatterhaloscopesinglemicrowavephotondetectorscanratesqueezedvacuumDFSZbenchmarkcavityqualityfactorpost-inflationarywindow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how fast a cavity haloscope can scan for axion dark matter when the readout is a single microwave photon counter instead of a linear amplifier, and whether that choice can open the experimentally hard part of the axion mass range. The authors derive closed-form scan-rate formulas for both readouts and find that photon counters become the superior choice at frequencies above about 5 GHz when background is low, provided the detector can be tuned across the haloscope's range or operated with a very low dark count rate. Their central forecast is that combining photon-counting readout with high-volume VERA cavities makes the DFSZ benchmark—a coupling strength about 2.6 times below the KSVZ benchmark—reachable across the entire 1–30 GHz post-inflationary axion window, with DFSZ reach up to 12.5 GHz even without the volume enhancement. This matters because the post-inflationary axion mass range is currently one of the hardest regions to probe experimentally.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the frequency-integrated signal-to-noise ratio $R$, computed from input-output theory (Heisenberg-Langevin equations) for a cavity with three ports: the measurement port with coupling $\kappa_m = \beta\kappa_l$, an intrinsic loss port $\kappa_l = \omega/Q_0$, and the axion port $\kappa_a$. The new element is allowing the termination temperature $T_b$ to differ from the haloscope temperature $T$, parameterized as $\gamma = (n_T + 1/2)/(n_b + 1/2)$. For the SMPD case the central closed form is Eq. (7), and its dark-count-limited limit Eq. (8), $R \propto n_A^2\kappa_a^2\eta^2\beta^2(1+\beta)^{-2}/\delta\nu_{\mathrm{DCR}}$, from which the $Q$-independence and the $\beta \sim 10$ behavior follow.

What would settle it

A direct test: integrate a state-of-the-art transmon-based microwave photon counter with a haloscope at base temperature and measure its tuning range and dark count rate. If tuning range stays below 3% and the dark count rate stays above about 1 per second, or if the cavity photon temperature cannot be reduced below about 30 mK, then the specific DFSZ-to-30 GHz forecast fails. Alternatively, measure the scan rate of two haloscopes with the same coupling but different quality factors in the dark-count-limited regime; Eq. (8) predicts identical rates, so a measurable Q-dependence would falsify the central identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's most consequential claim is Eq. (7), a closed-form scan-rate expression for a haloscope read out by a single microwave photon detector (SMPD). The expression organizes noise into three terms: on-resonance cavity emission, off-resonance background that scales with detector bandwidth $\Delta\nu_d$, and a dark-count-rate term $\delta\nu_{\mathrm{DCR}}$. In the background-free limit, Eq. (8) shows the scan rate reduces to $R \propto n_A^2 \kappa_a^2 \eta^2 \beta^2 (1+\beta)^{-2} / \delta\nu_{\mathrm{DCR}}$ and becomes independent of cavity quality factor, increasing weakly with coupling up to $\beta \sim 10$. On this basis, Section III.B forecasts that VERA high-volume cavities plus SMPDs reach the DFSZ benchmark for the entire $<30$ GHz range (Fig. 10, right panel), and that even a conventional cavity scaled as $\nu^{-3}$ reaches DFSZ to 12.5 GHz with a cavity photon temperature below about 30 mK and a detector dark count rate of 1 per second (Fig. 11).

Load-bearing premise

The forecasts that photon counters open the full 1–30 GHz window depend on building SMPDs that either tune over more than 20% of their bandwidth with a linewidth below 0.1%, or run with about 20% bandwidth and a dark count rate at or below 1 per second, while cooling the haloscope's photon field below about 30 millikelvin.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above about 5 GHz, with haloscope temperatures below about 150 mK, SMPD readout gives scan rates orders of magnitude beyond a standard SQL-limited amplifier, and still several times better than a squeezed-state amplifier, at equal dark count rates.
  • Operating a haloscope with coupling $\beta$ up to about 10 becomes attractive for photon-counting readout: the scan rate rises monotonically with $\beta$ and saturates near $\beta \sim 10$, whereas amplifier readout peaks at $\beta = 2$.
  • Squeezing should be understood as squeezing photon noise, not just quantum vacuum: $G_s > 1$ improves the scan rate even when $n_T \gg 1$, so it helps experiments at 1 GHz or even 1 MHz, independent of whether the cavity is in the vacuum state.
  • Achieving DFSZ sensitivity across the post-inflationary window requires one of two detector paths: a narrow-band (below 0.1%) SMPD tunable over more than 20% range, or a 20%-bandwidth SMPD with dark count rate no more than 1 per second paired with a cavity photon temperature below about 30 mK.
  • High-volume haloscope cavities cannot reach high $\beta$ with a single enlarged port, because mode localization defeats the coupling; they need a distributed array of ports whose outputs are coherently summed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $Q$-independence of the dark-count-limited scan rate holds, the value of ultra-high-$Q$ superconducting cavities largely evaporates for photon-counting axion searches; design effort should shift to volume, coupling, and detector bandwidth.
  • The same dark-count-limited logic generalizes to other single-photon detectors, such as infrared photon counters in broadband haloscopes: their scan rate should also become $Q$-independent once backgrounds are low enough.
  • The paper's explicit separation of termination temperature from cavity temperature suggests an immediately testable trick: cooling only a small termination resistor (or squeezing its radiation) should boost scan rate in existing amplifier-based haloscopes before any SMPD is ready.
  • The Fig. 11 scenario implies a fixed, broadband (20%) photon counter plus a tunable cavity inside its band is a viable near-term architecture; its reach depends almost entirely on dark-count engineering, not on cavity $Q$ or volume.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper derives scan-rate formulas for cavity haloscope axion searches read out by either a linear amplifier (including squeezed-state operation) or a single microwave photon detector (SMPD), and uses them to compare the two readout technologies over 1–30 GHz. The authors recover known results for the amplifier case in the appropriate limits, introduce a generalized treatment with different cavity and termination temperatures, and derive an SMPD scan-rate expression whose limiting cases give a DCR-dominated rate independent of Q, an off-resonance-background-dominated rate, and a cavity-emission-dominated rate. These formulas are then combined with the VERA high-volume cavity concept and stated SMPD performance goals to forecast reach to the KSVZ and DFSZ benchmark couplings. The central forecast is that a combination of VERA cavities and SMPDs could make DFSZ accessible across the entire <30 GHz post-inflationary axion window, and that even without volume enhancement, DFSZ could be reached up to about 12.5 GHz with DCR ≤1 s⁻¹ and haloscope photon temperatures below ~30 mK. The paper also argues for operating haloscopes in the overcoupled regime up to β~10 and for developing distributed port arrays in high-volume cavities.

Significance. If the forecasts are correct, the paper provides a useful quantitative roadmap for covering a large fraction of the post-inflationary axion window with near-term technology. Its strengths include the explicit analytic formulas that reproduce published results (e.g., Fig. 2 reproducing Fig. 2(b) of [12]), the normalization of scan-rate projections to achieved HAYSTAC limits, the inclusion of realistic loss and temperature asymmetries, and the candid statement of the detector and cryogenic R&D milestones required. The analysis also highlights a nontrivial and credible point: off-resonance background reduction and overcoupling can benefit scan rates beyond the usual β=2 optimum. However, the headline DFSZ forecasts depend on several extrapolated detector parameters (wide tunability or very low DCR, low photon temperature) and, as detailed below, on an unspecified treatment of the environmental photon occupation nγ that appears in the central SMPD formula.

major comments (2)
  1. [II.C / Table I / Figs. 10–11] The forecasts in Figs. 10 and 11 do not specify the value of the environmental photon occupation nγ introduced in §II.C as corresponding to Tγ = 30–50 mK. Table I lists Δν_d, Q0, volumes, and temperatures, but not Tγ or nγ. Since Eq. (7) includes nγ inside D(η,n_T,n_b), multiplying Δ, the figures silently assume a value. If nγ follows the stated Tγ = 40 mK, then the Planck occupation at 10 GHz is nγ ≈ 6×10⁻⁶ (not 0.08), so the environmental contribution for Fig. 11 with Δν_d = ν/5 is nγΔν_d ≈ 1.2×10⁴ s⁻¹, far above the δν_DCR = 1 s⁻¹ assumed for the right panel. For Fig. 10 right, with Δν_d = 7×10⁵ Hz, the same nγ gives nγΔν_d > 100 s⁻¹ for ν below roughly 5 GHz. Thus the DFSZ-up-to-12.5-GHz and 'entire <30 GHz' claims require either a documented nγ = 0 assumption (e.g., explicit filtering/shielding) or a recalculation with nγ included. Please add Tγ (or nγ) to Table I, state the value used in each figure, and report the sensitivity of the benchmark contours to this parameter. The notation 'DCR' in Figs. 10 and 11 should also clarify whether it denotes δν_DCR alone or the total environmental plus qubit count rate.
  2. [II.C, Eq. (7)] The step from the noise integral in Eq. (6) to the closed-form scan rate in Eq. (7) is described only as 'using these integrals recursively'. Because Eq. (7) underlies all SMPD forecasts and contains the D, E, and F functions with several cross-terms, the derivation should be given in an appendix or the intermediate integrals should be provided. The limiting cases discussed in the text are not sufficient to verify the E and F terms, which are numerically important in the transition regimes used in Figs. 8–11.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] Reference [48] (Mani, Ghenim, and Choi, Phys. Rev. B 43, 12630) appears unrelated to plasma haloscopes; this is likely a citation error and should be checked.
  2. [II heading] The heading 'THE SCAN RA TE CALCULATIONS' contains a typo and the word 'halsocope' appears in the first sentence of §II; please proofread for similar errors.
  3. [Table I] The Table I entry 'Δν_d ibid., for Fig. 11 ν/5' is ambiguous; please list explicitly which value applies to which figure and add the haloscope temperature T used in each of Figs. 10 and 11, since the text quotes '>~100 mK' and '~30 mK' scenarios without a table entry.
  4. [III.B.2] The statement that 20% frequency tunability is a 'necessary requirement' for SMPD adoption is later qualified by the current <3% tuning range of the cited devices; the conclusion appropriately lists this as R&D, but the body text could more clearly distinguish the planned requirement from the demonstrated capability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: Eqs. 5 and 7 are derived from input-output theory and known photon-noise integrals, and forecasts are normalized to an external HAYSTAC limit; the only minor self-citations are VERA volume scalings used as flagged engineering inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. Equations (1)-(5) are obtained from the Heisenberg-Langevin/input-output formalism in the text, following the external reference [12], and the paper explicitly verifies that its Eq. 5 reproduces Fig. 2(b) of Malnou et al. Equations (6)-(10) are derived from a stated photon field P(ν), the Poisson plus Bose noise variance, and the Lorentzian integrals computed in the text; the external citations [10,38,39] are used for the standard photon-noise expression, not as a substitute for the derivation. No target benchmark is fitted: the absolute normalization is anchored to the HAYSTAC exclusion limit [13], an external experimental result, and the KSVZ/DFSZ plots are evaluations of Eq. 7 with tabulated hypothetical detector parameters. The DCR-limited result (Eq. 8) and the over-coupling β≈10 observation are algebraic consequences of the stated dimensionless normalizations δ=δν_DCR/(πκ_l) and Δ=Δν_d/(πκ_l), so they do not reduce to an input assumption. The self-citations [43-46] concern VERA volume designs; the paper labels these as assumptions ('we assume VERA can increase the volume...') and acknowledges frequency-scaling uncertainties, so they are engineering inputs rather than load-bearing validation of the comparison. The main weakness is a missing parameter, not circularity: §II.C introduces environmental dark counts via nγ with Tγ=30-50 mK and Eq. 7's D includes +nγ, yet Table I omits Tγ and the 'background-free' forecasts (Figs. 10 right and 11) appear to use nγ≈0. Numerically, nγ(40 mK)≈0.08 at 10 GHz, giving environmental count rates nγΔν_d≈5.6×10^4 s^-1 for Δν_d=7×10^5 Hz and ≈1.7×10^8 s^-1 for Δν_d=ν/5, far above the assumed DCR=1-100 s^-1. That is an internal inconsistency in the forecast assumptions, but it is a correctness/consistency issue, not a circular reduction of the derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central results rest on standard input-output theory, cited photon-noise formulas, and a set of assumed device parameters. No free parameters are fitted to the DFSZ/KSVZ benchmarks; the parameters are taken from the HAYSTAC experiment, the SMPD literature, and projected VERA scaling. The main assumptions are the cryogenic temperature offset between cavity and termination, the efficiency lambda (or eta), the VERA volume scaling exponents, and the dark count rates. The VERA cavity designs and the distributed-port summing network are introduced by the authors; the wedge cavity has a published 7.5 GHz demonstration, while the beehive cavity and summing network are not yet experimentally demonstrated.

free parameters (5)
  • readout efficiency lambda/eta = sqrt(0.69) (Figs. 2,3), sqrt(0.7) (Table I)
    Assumed insertion/dissipation efficiency of the readout chain; directly sets the scan-rate magnitude and the comparison. Chosen by hand, not fitted to the target result.
  • termination-to-cavity temperature ratio Tb/T = 1/3 for T>0.03 K, floored at 0.01 K
    Assumed cryogenic condition that determines the noise temperature ratio gamma in Eq. (5); affects the squeezed-readout enhancement and the amplifier/SMPD comparison contours.
  • VERA volume scaling exponent alpha = alpha=1 (VERA-1), alpha=0.5 (VERA-2)
    Assumed frequency scaling of the effective haloscope volume in the forecasts of Fig. 10; derived from a single 7.5 GHz wedge demonstration and not yet validated at higher frequencies.
  • SMPD dark count rate delta_nu_DCR = 100 s^-1 (baseline), 10^3, 10, 1 s^-1 in parameter scans
    Assumed values spanning current SMPD performance to R&D targets; directly sets the DCR-limited scan rate in Eq. (8) and the forecasts in Figs. 8-11.
  • residual photon occupation n_gamma = corresponding to T_gamma = 30-50 mK
    Assumed residual microwave background in the SMPD environment; added linearly to the D function in Eq. (7).
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Input-output theory and Heisenberg-Langevin formalism as presented in Appendix A of Malnou et al. [12].
    Used to derive the amplifier spectral density Eq. (1) and visibility Eq. (4); the paper follows these steps without reproducing them.
  • standard math Photon-noise variance decomposes into Poisson and Bose terms, as in Lamoreaux et al. [10], Richards [38], and Zmuidzinas [39].
    Basis for the SMPD noise integral Eq. (6).
  • domain assumption Phase-insensitive linear amplifiers must add at least half a photon of noise (Caves [29]).
    Used in Section II.A to state the standard quantum limit that squeezing is meant to evade.
  • standard math Photon occupation of thermal sources follows the Planck distribution n = (e^{hbar*omega/kT} - 1)^{-1}.
    Used throughout to convert temperatures to occupation numbers nT, nb, n_gamma.
  • domain assumption Axion-photon conversion power and coupling follow the formulas reproduced in Eqns B(10) and B(11) of [12].
    Converts axion couplings to cavity photon occupation nA and coupling kappa_a.
  • domain assumption The axion field is spatially coherent over the haloscope volume (coherence length of a few hundred meters).
    Required for the distributed-port summing network in Section III.C to add signal in phase.
  • domain assumption The post-inflationary QCD axion mass window corresponds to 1-30 GHz.
    Defines the frequency range of interest and the benchmarks in Figs. 10-11; based on cited axion cosmology references.
invented entities (3)
  • VERA wedge cavity (thin-shell high-volume resonator) independent evidence
    purpose: Achieve V >> lambda^3 at fixed frequency to break the nu^-3 volume scaling and restore scan rate at high frequency.
    A triple-wedge 7.5 GHz version was experimentally demonstrated in Dyson et al. [45], so the basic design has independent evidence.
  • VERA beehive cavity (multi-cell overlapping cylinders)
    purpose: Alternative high-volume resonator geometry for 5-20 GHz, avoiding phase errors of wedge stacks.
    Presented as a design or proposal in Withers and Kuo [46] with simulations; no experimental demonstration is cited.
  • Distributed port array with coherent summing network
    purpose: Achieve target coupling beta in high-volume cavities by distributing readout ports and phase-summing their outputs, avoiding single-port mode localization.
    Supported only by unshown COMSOL examples (Section III.C) that report couplings 0.4-5; no hardware demonstration or detailed geometry is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Maximizing Quantum Enhancement in Axion Dark Matter Experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/45DQB4BY

@misc{pith2026241113776,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Maximizing Quantum Enhancement in Axion Dark Matter Experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/45DQB4BY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13776}
}
abstract

We provide a comprehensive comparison of linear amplifiers and microwave photon-counters in axion dark matter experiments. The study is done assuming a range of realistic operating conditions and detector parameters, over the frequency range between 1--30 GHz. As expected, photon counters are found to be advantageous under low background, at high frequencies ($\nu>$ 5 GHz), if they can be implemented with robust wide-frequency tuning or a very low dark count rate. Additional noteworthy observations emerging from this study include: (1) an expanded applicability of off-resonance photon background reduction, including the single-quadrature state squeezing, for scan rate enhancements; (2) a much broader appeal for operating the haloscope resonators in the over-coupling regime, up to $\beta\sim 10$; (3) the need for a detailed investigation into the cryogenic and electromagnetic conditions inside haloscope cavities to lower the photon temperature for future experiments; (4) the necessity to develop a distributed network of coupling ports in high-volume axion haloscopes to utilize these potential gains in the scan rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13776 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The experimental setup considered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: With [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Squeezing can be used in conjunction of having [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The SMPD [15–18] consists of an intake [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The experimental setup used in the analysis of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The contributions to photon noise near the resonance of the haloscope cavity. For a photon counting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: These contour plots show the scan rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The contour plots for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The VERA haloscopes. From left to right: a triple-wedge cavity (5–7 GHz), the cross section view of its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Combining the VERA approach and quantum techniques, it is possible to cover most of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: It is possible to significantly improve the scan rate to reach DFSZ up to 12.5 GHz even if [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    N. Du, N. Force, R. Khatiwada, E. Lentz, R. Ottens, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, G. Carosi, N. Woollett, D. Bowring, A. S. Chou, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, C. Boutan, N. S. Oblath, R. Bradley, E. J. Daw, A. V. Dixit, J. Clarke, S. R. O’Kelley, N. Crisosto, J. R. Glea- son, S. Jois, P. Sikivie, I. Stern, N. S. Sullivan, D. B. Tan- ner, and G. C. Hilton (ADM...

    2018

  2. [1]

    wedge” cavity and multi-cell “beehive

    Volume Enhancement and Squeezed Amplification The loss in volume at short wavelengths ( λ) can be circumvented by adopting novel resonators that fill a vol- ume ≫ λ3. In [43, 44, 46], we propose two such designs: the thin-shell “wedge” cavity and multi-cell “beehive” cavity (Fig. 9). These geometries can scale up in vol- ume at a fixed resonant frequency ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    The real game changer at these high frequencies must be the introduc- tion of SMPD in axion searches

    Using SMPD in Axion Searches Above 4 GHz, DFSZ is stubbornly out of reach even for VERA-2 with vacuum state squeezing. The real game changer at these high frequencies must be the introduc- tion of SMPD in axion searches. In the right panel of Fig. 10 we show the combination of VERA and SMPD, which shows DFSZ becoming accessible for the entire < 30 GHz ran...

    work page

  4. [3]

    A good milestone is the the reduction in the steepness of frequency scaling from V ∼ ν−3 to ν−0.5

    Develop high-volume ( ≫ λ3) haloscope resonators such as VERA, the plasma haloscopes, and the di- electric disk haloscopes. A good milestone is the the reduction in the steepness of frequency scaling from V ∼ ν−3 to ν−0.5

    work page

  5. [4]

    Develop SMPDs or similar microwave photon- counting detectors to have either of the following properties: (a) Bandwidth <∼ 0.1% and tunable range >∼ 20%; (b) Bandwidth ∼ 20% and very low DCR ( <∼ 1 s−1)

    work page

  6. [5]

    Item (1) alone should represent a robust approach to reach KSVZ up to 10 GHz using existing sensor technol- ogy in a large- B2 0 V magnet

    Lower the photon temperature of the haloscope res- onators and various backgrounds to <∼ 30 mK. Item (1) alone should represent a robust approach to reach KSVZ up to 10 GHz using existing sensor technol- ogy in a large- B2 0 V magnet. The combination (2b)+(3) will reach DFSZ up to 12 GHz and KSVZ to 23 GHz (Fig. 11). The combinations (1)+(2a) or (1)+(2b)+...

    work page

  7. [6]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  8. [7]

    Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    1978

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  2. [9]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Physics Letters B 120, 133 (1983)

    1983

  3. [10]

    D. J. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Physics Reports 643, 1 (2016), axion cosmology

    2016

  4. [11]

    invisible

    P. Sikivie, Experimental tests of the “invisible” axion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983)

    1983

  5. [13]

    Zhong, S

    L. Zhong, S. Al Kenany, K. M. Backes, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, G. Carosi, Y. V. Gurevich, W. F. Kindel, S. K. Lamoreaux, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Mal- nou, R. H. Maruyama, D. A. Palken, N. M. Rapidis, J. R. Root, M. Simanovskaia, T. M. Shokair, D. H. Speller, I. Urdin...

    2018

  6. [14]

    A. K. Yi, S. Ahn, C. Kutlu, J. M. Kim, B. R. Ko, B. I. Ivanov, H. Byun, A. F. van Loo, S. Park, J. Jeong, et al., 14 Axion dark matter search around 4 .55 µeV with dine- fischler-srednicki-zhitnitskii sensitivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071002 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    S. K. Lamoreaux, K. A. van Bibber, K. W. Lehnert, and G. Carosi, Analysis of single-photon and linear am- plifier detectors for microwave cavity dark matter axion searches, Phys. Rev. D 88, 035020 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    A. O. Sushkov, Quantum science and the search for axion dark matter, PRX Quantum 4, 020101 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Malnou, D

    M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, B. M. Brubaker, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, Squeezed vacuum used to accelerate the search for a weak classical signal, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021023 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    K. M. Backes, D. A. Palken, S. A. Kenany, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, A. Droster, G. C. Hilton, S. Ghosh, H. Jackson, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. F. Leder, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Malnou, R. H. Maruyama, N. M. Rapidis, M. Simanovskaia, S. Singh, D. H. Speller, I. Urdinaran, L. ...

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. J. Jewell, A. F. Leder, K. M. Backes, X. Bai, K. van Bibber, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, A. Droster, M. H. Esmat, S. Ghosh, E. Graham, G. C. Hilton, H. Jackson, C. Laffan, S. K. Lamoreaux, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Malnou, R. H. Maruyama, D. A. Palken, N. M. Ra- pidis,...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Lescanne, S

    R. Lescanne, S. Del´ eglise, E. Albertinale, U. R´ eglade, T. Capelle, E. Ivanov, T. Jacqmin, Z. Leghtas, and E. Flurin, Irreversible qubit-photon coupling for the de- tection of itinerant microwave photons, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021038 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Albertinale, L

    E. Albertinale, L. Balembois, E. Billaud, V. Ranjan, D. Flanigan, T. Schenkel, D. Est` eve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Detecting spins by their fluorescence with a microwave photon counter, Nature (London) 600, 434 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Balembois, J

    L. Balembois, J. Travesedo, L. Pallegoix, A. May, E. Bil- laud, M. Villiers, D. Est` eve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Cyclically operated microwave single-photon counter with sensitivity of 10 −22 W/ √ hz, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 014043 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Braggio, L

    C. Braggio, L. Balembois, R. Di Vora, Z. Wang, J. Trav- esedo, L. Pallegoix, G. Carugno, A. Ortolan, G. Ru- oso, U. Gambardella, D. D’Agostino, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Quantum-enhanced sensing of axion dark matter with a transmon-based single microwave pho- ton counter, arXi...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Guenther, K.-H. Kampert, S. D. Katz, T. Kawanai, T. G. Kovacs, S. W. Mages, A. Pasz- tor, F. Pittler, et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539, 69 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    V. B. Klaer and G. D. Moore, The dark-matter axion mass, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 11, 049

  18. [26]

    P. W. Graham and A. Scherlis, Stochastic axion scenario, Physical Review D 98, 10.1103/physrevd.98.035017 (2018)

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    Takahashi, W

    F. Takahashi, W. Yin, and A. H. Guth, QCD axion window and low-scale inflation, Physical Review D 98, 10.1103/physrevd.98.015042 (2018)

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Buschmann, J

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, Dark mat- ter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement, Nature Communications 13, 1049 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    J. E. Kim, Weak-interaction singlet and strong CP in- variance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979)

    1979

  22. [30]

    Shifman, A

    M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and V. Zakharov, Can con- finement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interac- tions?, Nuclear Physics B 166, 493 (1980)

    1980

  23. [31]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)

    1980

  24. [32]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong cp problem with a harmless axion, Physics Letters B 104, 199 (1981)

    1981

  25. [33]

    Al Kenany, M

    S. Al Kenany, M. Anil, K. Backes, B. Brubaker, S. Cahn, G. Carosi, Y. Gurevich, W. Kindel, S. Lamoreaux, K. Lehnert, et al., Design and operational experience of a microwave cavity axion detector for the 20–100µev range, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sect...

    2017

  26. [34]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum limits on noise in linear ampli- fiers, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817 (1982)

    1982

  27. [35]

    Brouwer, S

    L. Brouwer, S. Chaudhuri, H.-M. Cho, J. Corbin, C. S. Dawson, A. Droster, J. W. Foster, J. T. Fry, P. W. Gra- ham, R. Henning, K. D. Irwin, F. Kadribasic, Y. Kahn, A. Keller, R. Kolevatov, S. Kuenstner, A. F. Leder, D. Li, J. L. Ouellet, K. M. W. Pappas, A. Phipps, N. M. Rapid...

    2022

  28. [36]

    Bartram, T

    C. Bartram, T. Braine, R. Cervantes, N. Crisosto, N. Du, G. Leum, P. Mohapatra, T. Nitta, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, J. Clarke, I. Siddiqi, A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, M. H. Awida, A. S. Chou, M. Hollister, S. Knirck, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, J. R. Gleason, A. T. Hipp...

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Beurthey, N

    S. Beurthey, N. B¨ ohmer, P. Brun, A. Caldwell, L. Cheva- lier, C. Diaconu, G. Dvali, P. Freire, E. Garutti, C. Gooch, et al. , Madmax status report (2020), arXiv:2003.10894 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Yamamoto and et al., The Rydberg-Atom-Cavity Axion Search, in Dark Matter in Astro- and Particle Physics, edited by H

    K. Yamamoto and et al., The Rydberg-Atom-Cavity Axion Search, in Dark Matter in Astro- and Particle Physics, edited by H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus (2001) p. 638, arXiv:hep-ph/0101200 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Graham, S

    E. Graham, S. Ghosh, Y. Zhu, X. Bai, S. B. Cahn, E. Durcan, M. J. Jewell, D. H. Speller, S. M. Zacarias, L. T. Zhou, and R. H. Maruyama, Rydberg-atom-based 15 single-photon detection for haloscope axion searches, Phys. Rev. D 109, 032009 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    X. Fan, G. Gabrielse, P. W. Graham, R. Harnik, T. G. Myers, H. Ramani, B. A. D. Sukra, S. S. Y. Wong, and Y. Xiao, One-electron quantum cyclotron as a milli- ev dark-photon detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261801 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, A. Wallraff, J. M. Gambetta, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, B. John- son, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit, Nature (London) 445, 515 (2007), arXiv:cond- ...

    2007

  34. [42]

    A. V. Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Searching for dark mat- ter with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141302 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    P. L. Richards, Bolometers for infrared and millimeter waves, Journal of Applied Physics 76, 1 (1994)

    1994

  36. [44]

    Zmuidzinas, Thermal noise and correlations in photon detection, Appl

    J. Zmuidzinas, Thermal noise and correlations in photon detection, Appl. Opt. 42, 4989 (2003)

    2003

  37. [45]

    Cervantes, J

    R. Cervantes, J. Aumentado, C. Braggio, B. Giaccone, D. Frolov, A. Grassellino, R. Harnik, F. Lecocq, O. Mel- nychuk, R. Pilipenko, S. Posen, and A. Romanenko, Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark mat- ter with superconducting radio frequency cavities, Phys. Rev. D...

    2024

  38. [46]

    Pugnat, P

    P. Pugnat, P. Camus, O. Kwon, R. Ballou, C. Bruy` ere, H. Byun, W. Chung, T. Grenet, P. Perrier, Y. K. Se- mertzidis, A. Talarmin, and J. Vessaire, Grahal-capp for axion dark matter search with unprecedented sensitiv- ity in the 1–3 µev mass range, Frontiers in Physics 12, 10....

    2024

  39. [47]

    J. Kim, Y. Kim, S. Yoon, K. Shin, J. Lee, J. S. Jung, J. T. Lee, J.-G. Kim, D. Kim, J. Yoo, H. Lee, S.-H. Moon, and S. Hahn, Design, construction, and operation of an 18 T 70 mm no-insulation (RE)Ba 2Cu3O7−x magnet for an axion haloscope experiment, Review of Scientific Instru...

    2020

  40. [48]

    Kuo, Large-volume centimeter-wave cavities for ax- ion searches, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (06), 010

    C.-L. Kuo, Large-volume centimeter-wave cavities for ax- ion searches, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (06), 010

    2020

  41. [49]

    Kuo, Symmetrically tuned large-volume conic shell- cavities for axion searches, Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics 2021 (02), 018

    C.-L. Kuo, Symmetrically tuned large-volume conic shell- cavities for axion searches, Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics 2021 (02), 018

    2021

  42. [50]

    T. A. Dyson, C. L. Bartram, A. Davidson, J. B. Ezekiel, L. M. Futamura, T. Liu, and C.-L. Kuo, High-volume tunable resonator for axion searches above 7 ghz, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, L041002 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    M. O. Withers and C.-L. Kuo, A Beehive Haloscope for High-mass Axion Dark Matter, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2404.06627 (2024), arXiv:2404.06627 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Lawson, A

    M. Lawson, A. J. Millar, M. Pancaldi, E. Vitagliano, and F. Wilczek, Tunable axion plasma haloscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 141802 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    R. G. Mani, L. Ghenim, and J. B. Choi, Quantum coher- ence effects and field-induced localization in insb, Phys. Rev. B 43, 12630 (1991)

    1991

  46. [54]

    A. J. Millar, G. G. Raffelt, J. Redondo, and F. D. Stef- fen, Dielectric haloscopes to search for axion dark mat- ter: theoretical foundations, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 01, 061

  47. [55]

    J. Liu, K. Dona, G. Hoshino, S. Knirck, N. Kurinsky, M. Malaker, D. W. Miller, A. Sonnenschein, M. H. Aw- ida, P. S. Barry, K. K. Berggren, D. Bowring, G. Carosi, C. Chang, A. Chou, R. Khatiwada, S. Lewis, J. Li, S. W. Nam, O. Noroozian, and T. X. Zhou (BREAD Collab- oration),...

    2022

  48. [56]

    Zangwill, Modern Electrodynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2012)

    A. Zangwill, Modern Electrodynamics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.