Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 39 references

Smartphone tristimulus colorimetry for skin-tone analysis at common pulse oximetry anatomical sites

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A smartphone camera, with flash off and exposure 0.7 in dim light, yields skin-tone ITA values matching a clinical tristimulus colorimeter, the paper claims.

desk verdict A useful proof-of-concept that a smartphone can approximate colorimeter ITA at finger sites, but the headline claim outruns the evidence: the recommended exposure was chosen on the same four subjects, and agreement is reported only qualitatively. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13832 v1 pith:3B2KSKHO submitted 2024-11-21 physics.med-ph physics.optics

Joshua A. Burrow , Rutendo Jakachira , Gannon Lemaster , Kimani C. Toussaint Jr This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-phphysics.optics
keywords smartphonecolorimetryskin-toneanalysisindividualtypologyanglepulseoximetryCIELABcolorspacesRGBconversiontristimuluscolorimeterITAmapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An ordinary smartphone can take the place of a $5,000–$20,000 tristimulus colorimeter for measuring skin tone at pulse-oximetry sites, according to this paper. The authors show that an iPhone 11, held 7 cm from the finger with the flash off and room lights dimmed, produces individual typology angle (ITA) values that align with those of a clinical DSM-4 colorimeter across four volunteers with diverse skin tones. The key finding is a specific camera setting — exposure 0.7 — at which the phone's ITA readings consistently cross the colorimeter's value, so no color-calibration target or per-device correction is needed. This matters because pulse oximeters are biased on dark skin, and an objective, widely available skin-tone measurement would help standardize how skin tone is documented and corrected in clinical care.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the SITA image-analysis pipeline: sRGB gamma linearization of the phone's 8-bit RGB values, a fixed 3×3 matrix transform to CIE XYZ, normalization by a D65 reference white ($X_n = 0.95$, $Y_n = 1$, $Z_n = 1.09$), the standard CIE $L^*a^*b^*$ nonlinear transform, and the ITA definition $\mathrm{ITA} = \frac{180^\circ}{\pi} \arctan\left(\frac{L^* - 50}{b^*}\right)$. The empirical element that makes the pipeline accurate is the selection of camera exposure 0.7 as the operating point with flash off and lights off; the exposure–ITA response curves, fitted with a Boltzmann function, are what identify 0.7 as the setting where the phone's ITA equals the colorimeter's across all tested skin tones.

What would settle it

Place calibrated color standards with known L*a*b* values at the finger position in the SITA setup (iPhone 11, exposure 0.7, flash off, room lights off, 7 cm distance) and compute L*a*b* from the captured photos. If the recovered values deviate from the known chart values beyond measurement noise, then the 0.7 setting is not performing a true colorimetric measurement, and the skin-tone agreement would be an incidental match for the four tested individuals. A second test: run the full protocol on an independent cohort of at least fifty subjects spanning the full ITA range; the claim fails if the phone's ITA error relative to a DSM-4 colorimeter grows systematically with skin-tone category or with small changes in ambient light.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that the smartphone-based ITA (SITA) protocol — fixed 7 cm distance, perpendicular camera alignment, flash off, minimal ambient light, and camera exposure set to 0.7 — reproduces DSM-4 colorimeter ITA values for palmar and dorsal finger sites across individuals spanning light to very dark skin. This agreement is established empirically: Boltzmann fits to the ITA-versus-exposure curves for every volunteer and both finger sides locate the optimal exposure at the same 0.7 setting, marked as the point where the phone's reading matches the colorimeter's gray reference line. The authors further report that the dorsal finger side spans a wider ITA range than the palmar side, making it the more sensitive and recommended anatomical site for smartphone skin-tone assessment.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes the phone's RGB output, after standard sRGB gamma linearization and D65 white normalization, is a faithful colorimetric representation of the scene — even though the paper's own spectral data show the smartphone flash and room light do not match the D65 reference spectrum, so the phone's white balance and sensor response must be compensating in a way that the four-volunteer comparison does not independently verify.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Clinicians could measure and document a patient's skin tone with an ordinary smartphone, replacing subjective scales or expensive colorimeters and giving pulse-oximetry studies a quantitative covariate.
  • The fixed SITA settings — exposure 0.7, flash off, dim ambient light, 7 cm distance, perpendicular alignment — define a simple protocol that could be deployed in ICUs, surgical wards, and maternity units without specialized equipment.
  • The dorsal side of the finger, which the paper finds spans a wider ITA range than the palmar side, is recommended as the more sensitive site for smartphone skin-tone assessment.
  • The SITA algorithm produces per-pixel ITA maps, not just a single average, so it can resolve spatial pigmentation patterns that a point colorimeter cannot.
  • If the exposure-0.7 rule is stable across patients, a single standardized smartphone setting may be sufficient for diverse populations, avoiding per-device calibration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exposure-0.7 result is likely device-specific: an iPhone 11's sensor, tone-mapping, and auto-white-balance behavior will differ on other phone models, so the protocol would need re-derivation for each device rather than a universal setting.
  • Because the applicable light sources do not match D65, SITA's $L^*a^*b^*$ values are empirical approximations, not physically absolute colorimetry; adding a known reference color target to the field of view and computing a per-image transform would make the method transferable across phones and lighting.
  • A natural extension is continuous or repeated bedside monitoring, where relative changes in ITA over time (e.g., before and after oxygen therapy) may be more reliable than absolute values, since the method is calibrated at a single operating point.
  • The proof-of-concept cohort of four young, healthy volunteers is too small to assert that no calibration target is ever needed; testing on older patients, varied anatomical sites such as the wrist or earlobe, and patients with skin conditions is required before the protocol is considered generalizable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a smartphone-based imaging method (SITA) for estimating the individual typology angle (ITA) of skin at the finger, a common pulse oximetry site, and compares it against a commercial tristimulus colorimeter (DSM-4). Four volunteers with a range of skin tones were imaged with an iPhone 11 under varying exposure settings, flash conditions, and ambient lighting; the RGB images were converted to CIELAB and ITA via standard sRGB linearization and the CIE 1931 XYZ matrix. The authors report that with camera exposure set to 0.7, flash disabled, and ambient lights off, SITA ITA values best approximate the DSM-4 reference, and they recommend this configuration as a reliable protocol. The paper includes a detailed description of the algorithm, a 3D-printed finger mount, and qualitative and quantitative descriptions of exposure-dependent ITA behavior, with limitations noted in the Discussion.

Significance. If validated, this work addresses an important clinical need: objective, accessible skin-tone quantification for pulse oximetry bias assessment. The methodological strengths include the correct application of standard colorimetric transformations (sRGB linearization, CIE XYZ matrix, CIELAB/ITA equations), a simple and low-cost hardware setup, and a spatially resolved ITA mapping rather than a single point measurement. The authors also commit to releasing datasets on GitHub, which would support reproducibility. However, the central claim that exposure 0.7 is the optimal setting rests on a parameter selected from the same four volunteers used to demonstrate agreement, and no quantitative agreement metrics are reported. The paper is therefore a promising proof of concept whose central claim needs additional validation before the protocol can be endorsed as an 'effective alternative' to industry colorimetry.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Fig. 6] The optimal exposure setting of 0.7 is identified post hoc as the point where ITA values 'best match the industry standard' for each volunteer (red stars in Fig. 6), and the same data are then used to claim agreement between SITA and DSM-4 at that setting. Because exposure is the only tunable parameter in an otherwise deterministic pipeline, this is an in-sample evaluation. The central claim requires validation on held-out data or leave-one-out cross-validation; otherwise the reported agreement at 0.7 is a restatement of the selection criterion rather than an independent test.
  2. [§3 (Results)] No quantitative error or agreement statistics are reported for the comparison between SITA and DSM-4: there is no mean absolute ITA error, correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman limits of agreement, or per-volunteer or per-site error table. The claim that SITA 'correlates well' (Abstract) is supported only by visual inspection of Fig. 6. Quantitative metrics are needed to assess whether the agreement is clinically acceptable, especially for the darker dorsal sites where the ITA range is largest.
  3. [§2.3.2 and Fig. S1] The algorithm assumes the iPhone's RGB response, after sRGB gamma linearization, can be interpreted under a fixed D65 reference white (Xn=0.95, Yn=1.0, Zn=1.09). However, Fig. S1 shows that the smartphone flash and the overhead light spectra do not match the nominal D65 illuminant. Without a white-balance calibration or a colorimetric characterization of the camera, the computed L* and b* values may carry a systematic offset. The fact that exposure 0.7 was chosen to minimize disagreement with DSM-4 could mask such an offset, so the D65 assumption needs to be explicitly tested or corrected.
  4. [Abstract and §5] The Abstract and Conclusion state that smartphone-based imaging 'provides an effective alternative' and that exposure 0.7 is 'a reliable configuration,' while the Discussion acknowledges the proof-of-concept nature, the small sample (n=4), and the restricted demographic (young, healthy adults). Given the in-sample selection of the exposure parameter, these claims overstate the evidence. The conclusions should be tempered to reflect that the protocol is a candidate configuration requiring validation in a larger, more diverse cohort.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1] The phrase 'does not meet the federal definition of generalizability' is unclear; presumably the authors mean the study does not meet the regulatory definition of human subjects research requiring IRB approval. This wording should be revised for accuracy.
  2. [§2.3.2] The text says 'averaging the ITA values accross all pixels'; 'accross' is a typo for 'across.'
  3. [§3, Fig. 4 caption] MST is mentioned in the Fig. 4 caption but is not defined in the main text; the Monk Skin Tone scale should be defined at first use.
  4. [§3] The sentence 'For the finger dorsal, palmar and dorsal sides of the wrist span 71.16°, 75.08° and 82.08°, respectively' is grammatically incomplete; it appears to refer to the ITA ranges of dorsal finger, palmar wrist, and dorsal wrist but should be restated clearly.
  5. [§2.2] The text says '10◦ standard observer' but the degree symbol is likely meant for the observer angle; clarify whether the 10° or 2° standard observer was used, since this affects the colorimetric computations.
  6. [§3] The Boltzmann fit equation defines dx as a fitting parameter, but the text calls it 'and time constant (i.e., slope)'; the wording 'and time constant' is a typo and should read 'a time constant' or 'the slope parameter.'

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Optimal exposure 0.7 is selected by minimizing disagreement on the same volunteers used to claim agreement; the reported match at 0.7 is therefore in-sample.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3 Results (Fig. 6 caption and text); Sec. 5 Conclusion]
    "The red star on each plot highlights the optimal exposure setting (0.7) for the flash-off and ambient lights-off condition, where ITA values best match the industry standard. ... the optimal exposure setting consistently identified as 0.7 ... suggesting that the 0.7 exposure setting yields ITA values closest to the industry standard under these conditions."

    The 'optimal' exposure is not predicted from an independent model; it is selected on the same four volunteers as the setting where the SITA ITA is closest to the DSM-4 reference (the gray dashed line). The conclusion that 'the 0.7 exposure setting yields ITA values closest to the industry standard' is therefore a restatement of the selection criterion (argmin over tested exposures of |SITA(x) - DSM4|), not an independent confirmation. The subsequent conclusion that 0.7 is 'a reliable configuration for ITA alignment' is a generalization from this in-sample optimum without holdout data or cross-validation. Thus the central agreement claim reduces, by construction, to the way the exposure parameter was chosen.

full rationale

The colorimetric derivation itself is largely self-contained: the RGB-to-XYZ matrix, sRGB linearization, D65 normalization, and ITA formula are standard and stated explicitly, with no load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem. The circular step is confined to the exposure recommendation. In Sec. 3/Fig. 6, the 'optimal exposure setting' is defined as the one where smartphone ITA values best match the industry-standard colorimeter on the same four volunteers; the paper then reports that at 0.7 the values are closest to the industry standard, which is a tautological restatement of that selection rule. No quantitative error metrics (mean absolute ITA error, correlation, Bland-Altman limits) or holdout validation are provided, so the Abstract's 'correlates well' and the Conclusion's 'reliable configuration' are in-sample statements. The Discussion does acknowledge the proof-of-concept design and limited demographic, but the central recommendation nevertheless reduces to a parameter chosen on the evaluation data. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the underlying imaging pipeline has independent content, but the headline claim of agreement at exposure 0.7 is forced by the selection procedure.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central result rests on standard color science (sRGB transfer function, XYZ matrix, CIELAB transform, ITA definition) pulled from prior literature, plus two domain assumptions: the camera behaves as a standard sRGB/D65 device, and the DSM-4 colorimeter is ground truth. The only fitted quantity is the exposure setting (0.7), chosen post hoc to make the phone match the colorimeter on the same four volunteers; no holdout validation is performed.

free parameters (1)
  • Camera exposure setting (optimal, 0.7) = 0.7 (relative exposure on iPhone 11)
    Selected post hoc as the exposure where SITA ITA values are closest to the DSM-4 colorimeter reference across volunteers. This is the central tunable parameter of the protocol and was not predicted or held out.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The iPhone 11 camera, after sRGB gamma decoding, produces RGB values that can be mapped to CIE XYZ with the standard sRGB matrix and D65 white point.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.3.2 for the RGB-to-Lab transform, but Fig. S1 shows the smartphone flash and overhead light spectra deviate from the nominal D65 illuminant, so the D65 normalization may introduce bias.
  • domain assumption The DSM-4 colorimeter provides the ground-truth ITA for skin tone.
    The comparison in Sec. 3 treats DSM-4 as the gold standard; the paper does not validate DSM-4's accuracy for skin tone against another independent reference.
  • domain assumption ITA, defined as arctan((L* - 50)/b*), is a suitable single metric for skin tone in pulse oximetry contexts.
    The paper uses ITA as the sole endpoint and notes that ITA is a simplified proxy and not skin color itself (Sec. 1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Smartphone tristimulus colorimetry for skin-tone analysis at common pulse oximetry anatomical sites." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3B2KSKHO

@misc{pith2026241113832,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Smartphone tristimulus colorimetry for skin-tone analysis at common pulse oximetry anatomical sites},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3B2KSKHO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13832}
}
read the original abstract

Significance: Smartphones hold great potential in point-of-care settings due to their accessibility and computational capabilities. This is critical as clinicians increasingly seek to quantify skin-tone, a characteristic which has been shown to impact the accuracy of pulse oximetry readings, particularly for dark skin tones, and hence, disproportionately affect patient outcomes. Aim: This study presents a smartphone-based imaging technique for determining individual typology angle (ITA) and compares these results to those obtained using an industry-standard tristimulus colorimeter, particularly for the finger, a common site for pulse oximetry measurements. Approach: We employ a smartphone-based imaging method to extract ITA values from four volunteers with diverse skin-tones. The study provides recommendations for minimizing errors caused by ambient light scattering, which can affect skin-tone readings. Results: The smartphone-based ITA (SITA) measurements with camera flash disabled and minimal ambient lighting correlates well with the industry-standard colorimeter without the need for auxiliary adapters and complex calibration. The method presented enables wide-field ITA mapping for skin-tone quantification that is accessible to clinicians. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that smartphone-based imaging provides an effective alternative for assessing skin-tone in clinical settings. The reduced complexity of the approach presented makes it highly accessible to the clinical community and others interested in carrying out pulse oximetry across a diversity of skin-tones in a manner that standardizes skin-tone assessment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. R. Feiner, J. A. Severinghaus, and P. B. Bickler, ``Dark skin decreases the accuracy of pulse oximeters at low oxygen saturation: The role of bias and precision,'' Anesthesia & Analgesia 105 (6), S18--S23 (2007). Accessed: 2024-10-03

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    T. R. Else, L. Hacker, J. Gr \"o hl, et al. , `` Effects of skin tone on photoacoustic imaging and oximetry ,'' Journal of Biomedical Optics 29 (S1), S11506 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Sjoberg and N

    F. Sjoberg and N. Torkamani, ``Greater accuracy in spo2 measurements with ohmeda oximeters observed,'' Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    A. M. Cabanas, P. Martín-Escudero, and K. H. Shelley, ``Improving pulse oximetry accuracy in dark-skinned patients: technical aspects and current regulations,'' British Journal of Anaesthesia 131 (4), 640--644 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Fawzy, T

    A. Fawzy, T. D. Wu, K. Wang, et al. , `` Racial and Ethnic Discrepancy in Pulse Oximetry and Delayed Identification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With COVID-19 ,'' JAMA Internal Medicine 182 , 730--738 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    M. W. Sjoding, R. P. Dickson, T. J. Iwashyna, et al. , ``Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement,'' New England Journal of Medicine 383 (25), 2477--2478 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    S. Hao, K. Dempsey, J. Matos, et al. , ``Utility of skin tone on pulse oximetry in critically ill patients: A prospective cohort study,'' Critical Care Explorations 6 (9) (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Mantri and J

    Y. Mantri and J. V. Jokerst, ``Impact of skin tone on photoacoustic oximetry and tools to minimize bias,'' Biomed. Opt. Express 13 , 875--887 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Jakachira, M

    R. Jakachira, M. Diouf, Z. Lin, et al. , ``Single-wavelength, single-shot pulse oximetry using an led-generated vector beam,'' Opt. Express 30 , 27293--27303 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    V. S. Valbuena, R. P. Barbaro, D. Claar, et al. , ``Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement among patients about to undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 2019-2020: A retrospective cohort study,'' Chest 161 (4), 971--978 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    G. W. Burnett, B. Stannard, D. B. Wax, et al. , `` Self-reported Race/Ethnicity and Intraoperative Occult Hypoxemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study ,'' Anesthesiology 136 , 688--696 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    V. S. M. Valbuena, S. Seelye, M. W. Sjoding, et al. , ``Racial bias and reproducibility in pulse oximetry among medical and surgical inpatients in general care in the veterans health administration 2013-19: multicenter, retrospective cohort study,'' BMJ 378 , e069775 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Vasudevan, W

    S. Vasudevan, W. C. Vogt, S. Weininger, et al. , ``Melanometry for objective evaluation of skin pigmentation in pulse oximetry studies,'' Communications Medicine 4 (1), 138 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    T. B. Fitzpatrick, ``Soleil et peau,'' J. Med. Esthet. 2 , 33--34 (1975)

    1975

  7. [15]

    D. S. Massey and J. A. Martin, ``The nis skin color scale,'' (2003)

    2003

  8. [16]

    Verkruysse, M

    W. Verkruysse, M. B. Jaffe, M. Lipnick, et al. , ``Challenges of subjective skin color scales: The case for the use of objective pigmentation measurement methods in regulatory pulse oximetry studies,'' Anesthesia & Analgesia 139 (2) (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Monk, ``Monk skin tone scale,'' (2019)

    E. Monk, ``Monk skin tone scale,'' (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    B. C. K. Ly, E. B. Dyer, J. L. Feig, et al. , ``Research techniques made simple: Cutaneous colorimetry: A reliable technique for objective skin color measurement,'' Journal of Investigative Dermatology 140 (1), 3--12.e1 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Del Bino and F

    S. Del Bino and F. Bernerd, `` Variations in skin colour and the biological consequences of ultraviolet radiation exposure ,'' British Journal of Dermatology 169 , 33--40 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    K. S. Krishnapriya, G. Pangelinan, M. C. King, et al. , ``Analysis of manual and automated skin tone assignments,'' in 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) , 429--438 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Chardon, I

    A. Chardon, I. Cretois, and C. Hourseau, ``Skin colour typology and suntanning pathways,'' International Journal of Cosmetic Science 13 (4), 191--208 (1991)

    1991

  14. [22]

    B. Hunt, A. J. Ruiz, and B. W. Pogue, `` Smartphone-based imaging systems for medical applications: a critical review ,'' Journal of Biomedical Optics 26 (4), 040902 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    S. Kim, D. Cho, J. Kim, et al. , ``Smartphone-based multispectral imaging: system development and potential for mobile skin diagnosis,'' Biomed. Opt. Express 7 , 5294--5307 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    P. R. Center, ``Americans' use of mobile technology and home broadband,'' (2024). Accessed: 2024-09-18

    2024

  17. [25]

    H. Park, Y. G. Koh, and W. Lee, ``Smartphone-based colorimetric analysis of structural colors from ph-responsive photonic gel,'' Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 345 , 130359 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Flaucher, M

    M. Flaucher, M. Nissen, K. M. Jaeger, et al. , ``Smartphone-based colorimetric analysis of urine test strips for at-home prenatal care,'' IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine 10 , 1--9 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    M. N. Azhar, A. Bustam, F. S. Naseem, et al. , ``Improving the reliability of smartphone-based urine colorimetry using a colour card calibration method,'' DIGITAL HEALTH 9 , 20552076231154684 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Balbach, N

    S. Balbach, N. Jiang, R. Moreddu, et al. , ``Smartphone-based colorimetric detection system for portable health tracking,'' Analytical Methods 13 (38), 4361--4369 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Cao and M

    M. Cao and M. R. Luo, ``Preferred skin tones on mobile displays under illuminants having different correlated colour temperatures,'' Vision Research 198 , 108060 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Cronin, E

    A. Cronin, E. R. Tkaczyk, I. Hussain, et al. , ``Effect of camera distance and angle on color of diverse skin tone-based standards in smartphone photos,'' Journal of Biophotonics 16 (6), e202200381 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Chen, C.-Y

    C.-C. Chen, C.-Y. Chung, Y.-W. Chiu, et al. , ``Reliability analysis of a novel measurement system for quantifying human skin color,'' Skin Health and Disease 3 (1), e182 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    W. Wu, J. P. Allebach, and M. Analoui, ``Imaging colorimetry using a digital camera,'' in International Conference on Communications in Computing , (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    Ebner, Gamma Correction , John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex (2007)

    M. Ebner, Gamma Correction , John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Accessed: 2024-09-30

    `` ISO 22028-2:2013 Photography and graphic technology — Extended colour encodings for digital image storage, manipulation and interchange — Part 2: Reference output medium metric RGB colour image encoding (ROMM RGB) .'' https://www.iso.org/standard/56591.html (2013). Accessed...

    2013

  27. [35]

    B. J. Lindbloom, ``Accurate color reproduction for computer graphics applications,'' in Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques , SIGGRAPH '89 , 117–126, Association for Computing Machinery, (New York, NY, USA) (1989)

    1989

  28. [36]

    Abramowitz and M

    M. Abramowitz and M. W. Davidson, ``Exposure of photomicrographs using film,'' (1995--2023). Accessed: 2024-10-07

    1995

  29. [37]

    Oborska-Kumaszynska, ``Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics,'' in Wide Spectra of Quality Control , I

    D. Oborska-Kumaszynska, ``Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics,'' in Wide Spectra of Quality Control , I. Akyar, Ed., ch. 8, IntechOpen, Rijeka (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Zoltie, S

    T. Zoltie, S. Blome-Eberwein, S. Forbes, et al. , ``Medical photography using mobile devices,'' BMJ 378 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.