Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 23 references

A Multi-Layer Blockchain Simulator and Performance Evaluation of Social Internet of Vehicles with Multi-Connectivity Management

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a retransmission-aware multi-connectivity rule raises blockchain transaction throughput in V2X networks by 18.71%.

desk verdict A useful open-source V2X-blockchain simulator with a plausible retransmission heuristic; the headline throughput gain is statistically unsupported by single-run results. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14000 v1 pith:DECJRCLK submitted 2024-11-21 cs.NI

Yi-Ting Sun , Hsin-Chieh Lee , Yun-Chen Yu , Ting-Feng Wu , Ibrahim Althamary , Chih-Wei Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NI
keywords blockchainV2XSocialInternetofVehiclesmulti-connectivitymanagementretransmissionsatellitecommunicationperformanceevaluationmulti-agentreinforcementlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in satellite-assisted vehicle-to-everything (V2X) networks where roadside units run a blockchain, the way vehicles select their radio connections determines how many vehicle messages become confirmed transactions. The authors propose a reference scheme, Enhanced MAX-SINR, that adds retransmission-aware choices to the standard maximum-SINR selection rule, and test it in a multi-layer simulator that couples SUMO traffic mobility, radio propagation including low-Earth-orbit satellite links, and the BlockSim blockchain simulator. At a vehicle count of 300, the scheme reaches 264.286 transactions per second, an 18.71% increase over a multi-agent reinforcement learning baseline that manages spectrum for non-blockchain goals. The paper's advertised takeaway is that boosting the success rate of retransmitted blockchain-related messages is the lever that improves blockchain performance, and that the released open-source simulator allows future intelligent management schemes to be developed and tested.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is Algorithm 1, the Enhanced MAX-SINR selection method. For each transmission attempt, a vehicle chooses a connection mode, transmit power, and sub-channel; on a failed attempt it randomly selects one of four recovery strategies, which lets it escape congested channels that plain MAX-SINR would re-enter because it only considers interference from the previous transmission. Around this, the three-layer simulator, combining SUMO for vehicle mobility, a radio layer with sub-channels and satellite links, and BlockSim for the RSU miner blockchain, runs on a single global clock. Messages arrive at RSUs with latencies set by the chosen connection mode; when the global clock matches the arrival time, the message is verified and added to the transaction pool, and when it matches exponentially distributed block generation and reception times, blocks are minted and broadcast. That arrangement is what lets the authors tie retransmission success to the number of confirmed transactions per second.

What would settle it

Re-run the reported 300-vehicle urban scenario with 10 or more random seeds, varying traffic starting positions, channel fading realizations, and hash-power sampling, and compute confidence intervals for transaction throughput. If the intervals for Enhanced MAX-SINR and MARL overlap, the headline improvement is not established; if the ordering reverses, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a multi-connectivity management rule explicitly tuned for retransmission success substantially improves blockchain throughput in an integrated V2X-blockchain simulation. When a vehicle's previous transmission fails, Enhanced MAX-SINR randomly picks among four strategies: switching to the best-SINR connection in a different connection mode, switching to a different sub-channel in the same mode, keeping the previous transmission selection, or reapplying plain MAX-SINR. Across urban, suburban, and rural traffic densities, the rule outperforms MARL, MAX-SINR, and random selection, and the paper reports the highest transaction throughput at 300 vehicles, 264.286 TX/s versus 222.62 TX/s for MARL. The paper also identifies system-level implementation challenges, such as two simulation timelines across the transportation, connection, and consensus layers, and resolves them with a global clock that dictates when messages enter the transaction pool and when blocks are generated and synchronized.

Load-bearing premise

The evaluation rests on treating one 50-second simulation run per setting as representative: the paper reports point values without seeds, repeated runs, or confidence intervals, so the claimed 18.71% gain could be within run-to-run variability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Transaction throughput saturates around 300 vehicles for every tested method, suggesting that in dense traffic the blockchain consensus layer, not radio access, becomes the binding constraint on confirmed transactions.
  • Multi-connectivity management for blockchain-based V2X should be designed around retransmission success, because a failed retransmission removes a message from the pool that would have become a transaction.
  • Adjusting the block generation time trades throughput against fork risk: shorter block intervals can raise throughput but also increase forks and unconfirmed transactions, and Enhanced MAX-SINR stays highest across all tested block intervals.
  • The open-source multi-layer simulator provides a testbed on which future intelligent management methods can be evaluated in an environment that includes traffic, radio, and consensus together.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 18.71% gain is against a MARL agent that optimizes non-blockchain throughput and delay; a stricter comparison would pit Enhanced MAX-SINR against a method also optimized for retransmission success, to separate the benefit of retransmission awareness from the effect of simply having more choices after a failure.
  • Because the evaluation uses one run per setting, the paper's strongest product is the simulator itself rather than the specific throughput ordering; multiple seeds would turn the reported numbers into a statistically grounded comparison.
  • The paper leaves implicit that the same global-clock architecture could be used to localize the dominant bottleneck, whether retransmission failures or consensus parameters, by varying one layer while holding the others fixed.
  • A testable extension the authors do not run is to feed retransmission-failure statistics into the MARL reward function so agents learn to minimize the blockchain-level cost, which could combine MARL's adaptivity with the reference scheme's retransmission awareness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multi-layer simulation architecture that couples SUMO vehicular traffic with the BlockSim blockchain simulator and a satellite-assisted V2X connectivity layer. The authors implement and release an open-source V2X-blockchain simulator, address the synchronization of the two independent timelines (message delivery and block generation), and propose a reference multi-connectivity management method, Enhanced MAX-SINR, which adds four retransmission strategies to the conventional MAX-SINR selection. Evaluations in mixed urban/suburban/rural scenarios compare Enhanced MAX-SINR against MARL [9], MAX-SINR, and Random selection, reporting message throughput and transaction throughput for vehicle counts from 100 to 500. The headline result is 264.286 TX/s at 300 vehicles for Enhanced MAX-SINR, an 18.71% improvement over the MARL baseline's 222.62 TX/s.

Significance. The simulator integration and public code release are the strongest assets: combining SUMO and BlockSim with satellite-assisted V2X connectivity, and explicitly handling the two independent timelines, is useful and reusable for the community. The proposed Enhanced MAX-SINR is simple enough to serve as a benchmark and follows a plausible congestion-avoidance intuition. However, the quantitative contribution is currently supported only by single point estimates from a short stochastic simulation, and the causal mechanism asserted in the abstract is not directly measured. The contribution is therefore promising but not yet substantiated to the standard required for a headline performance claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§V-B, Figs. 6–7; Table I] The headline claim—an 18.71% transaction-throughput gain of Enhanced MAX-SINR over MARL at 300 vehicles (264.286 vs. 222.62 TX/s)—is based on a single 50-second simulation run per configuration, with no seeds, repetitions, confidence intervals, or variance estimates reported. This is a serious concern because the simulator is stochastic at several levels: Algorithm 1 (line 6) chooses retransmission strategies uniformly at random, the physical layer includes Rayleigh fading and log-normal shadowing, and block generation/reception times are exponential (Eqs. (2)–(3)). With simTime=50 s and TG=2.7 s, only roughly 18 block slots are generated per run, so the 41.7 TX/s difference could easily be within run-to-run variability. Please repeat each configuration over multiple independent seeds and report means with confidence intervals (or all per-run values), preferably with paired comparisons across methods.
  2. [§V-A; §V-B] The MARL baseline is taken from reference [9], which the paper describes as optimizing a non-blockchain utility function (throughput, delay, and power constraints), and no implementation details of the MARL policy used in this simulation are given (training steps, reward weights, architecture, seeds). The comparison therefore mixes two differences: the multi-connectivity management algorithm and the optimization objective. Either adapt the MARL reward to a blockchain-oriented metric, report its training setup and variance under the same conditions, or explicitly limit the claim to 'outperforms the published MARL policy of [9]' rather than 'outperforms MARL-based approaches' generally.
  3. [Abstract; §IV; §V-B] The paper's stated mechanism is that Enhanced MAX-SINR 'enhances the success rate of retransmitted messages' and that this raises blockchain transaction throughput, but no retransmission-success metric is reported anywhere in Section V. Without a measurement of retransmission success probability (or failure rate) per method, the data do not establish the causal link: the gain may come from better first-attempt selection, shorter delay, or fewer retransmissions overall. Please report retransmission-level statistics and, if possible, analyze throughput conditioned on retransmission success.
  4. [§V-A, Table I; Eq. (6)] The 50-second simulation horizon and 2.7-second average block interval yield only about 18 block slots per run; with exponential block generation and block broadcast delays, a single run may contain few finalized blocks, making transaction throughput in Eq. (6) sensitive to the exact realization of forks and synchronization. The paper neither discusses burn-in/steady-state behavior nor reports the number of blocks actually generated per scenario. Please add this information and, ideally, longer-horizon results to show that the ordering among methods is stable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Fig. 1] The abstract contains the typo 'retransmission successfull rates', and the Fig. 1 caption reads 'The the multi-layer model'; both should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (5)] Equation (5) is typeset as 'M EP LM' and does not convey the intended division; it should be written as a fraction, e.g., M_E / sum(L_M), with the symbols clearly defined.
  3. [Table I; §V-A] In Table I, the unit for 'GLB: Block Gas Limit' is given as '(s)', which is not a gas unit; and Section V-A states vehicle densities of 'over 2000, 1000, and 400 vehicles per km respectively', where the unit should be clarified (per km² or per road km).
  4. [References] Reference [8] lacks volume and page information, and reference [11] lacks a volume number; please complete the bibliographic details.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central comparison is an empirical simulation result, with only modest self-citation that is not load-bearing for the main claim.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that Enhanced MAX-SINR improves blockchain transaction throughput relative to MARL, MAX-SINR, and Random, and the reported 264.286 TX/s vs 222.62 TX/s is a simulation output, not a quantity fitted from the data. The derivation chain is not circular: the proposed Algorithm 1 is stated independently, and the simulation mechanisms (SUMO traffic, BlockSim, Eq. (2) block generation, Eq. (3) block reception, and physical-layer models) are external to the claim rather than defined in terms of the claimed result. The paper does rely on the authors' own MARL work [9] as a baseline and cites a related-work paper for the relevance of retransmissions [16], but those are empirical baselines and related-work references, not uniqueness theorems or definitional inputs that force the outcome. The weakest aspect is statistical, not circular: Section V-A fixes simTime=50 s and Section V-B reports point values without seeds or confidence intervals, and Algorithm 1 uses random strategies on retransmission failures, so a single run may not distinguish the 18.71% gain from noise. That is a correctness/evidence concern, which the instructions say should not be scored as circularity. Since the comparison is self-contained against external simulators and no parameter is fitted to produce the headline number, the appropriate score is 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result depends on BlockSim's exponential block timing model and on the particular simulation configuration; no new physical entities are introduced. The heuristic algorithm is a design, not an entity.

free parameters (2)
  • Hash power Gaussian parameters = unspecified mean/variance
    Section III-A states hash power is allocated with a Gaussian distribution but does not report the mean or variance; these shape the block generation times and affect the blockchain throughput results.
  • Retransmission strategy choice probabilities = uniform over {0, 1, 2, 3}
    Algorithm 1 chooses one of four strategies by drawing a random integer from {0, 1, 2, 3}; the uniform probabilities are a design choice not varied or justified in the paper.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Block generation time tG follows an exponential distribution with rate proportional to hash power share, and block receive time tR follows an exponential distribution with mean TR.
    Equations (2) and (3) adopt BlockSim's simplified consensus model; this ignores real mining difficulty adjustments, propagation delays, and fork resolution details that can influence transaction throughput.
  • domain assumption RSUs are the only blockchain miners; vehicles do not participate in mining or consensus.
    Section II-C and Section III state RSUs package transactions and generate blocks, which is a specific architecture choice and not justified as optimal for SIoV.
  • domain assumption Messages that reach an RSU and pass verification become transactions; transaction throughput is determined by successful radio transmission plus block production.
    This links the connection layer to the consensus layer and is central to interpreting message throughput improvements as blockchain improvements.
  • ad hoc to paper A single 50-second simulation run per scenario is representative of system performance.
    Table I lists simTime=50 s and Section V-B shows point values without repeated runs or confidence intervals, so the statistical representativeness is assumed rather than demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper The MARL baseline from [9] is a fair comparator even though it optimizes non-blockchain utility.
    Section V-B describes MARL as targeting non-blockchain performance objectives; the paper uses it as the reference for the 18.71% improvement without demonstrating that the baseline was tuned or adapted for blockchain throughput.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Multi-Layer Blockchain Simulator and Performance Evaluation of Social Internet of Vehicles with Multi-Connectivity Management." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DECJRCLK

@misc{pith2026241114000,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Multi-Layer Blockchain Simulator and Performance Evaluation of Social Internet of Vehicles with Multi-Connectivity Management},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DECJRCLK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14000}
}
read the original abstract

The evolution of vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication brings significant challenges, such as data integrity and vulnerabilities stemming from centralized management. This paper presents an innovative integration of decentralized blockchain technology with V2X communication through a multi-layered architecture that combines the Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) traffic simulator and the BlockSim blockchain simulator. In addition, as the Social Internet of Vehicles (SIoV) emerges, efficient resource management becomes indispensable for ensuring seamless communication. We also propose a reference multi-connectivity management method named Enhanced MAX-SINR, designed to advance research in blockchain-specific approaches, taking into account retransmission successfull rates. We evaluate blockchain performance in diverse environments such as urban, suburban, and rural areas, demonstrating that enhancing the success rate of retransmitted blockchain-related messages significantly boosts blockchain transaction performance and provides a foundation for developing intelligent SIoV systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14000 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The the multi-layer model for integrating blockchain and SIoV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Integrated System for Parallel Processing of Two Timelines. The blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Block Generation and Transaction Packaging Process. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Vehicles and RSUs Distribution Generated by SUMO Simulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Message throughput under different average numbers of vehicles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Transaction throughput under different average numbers of vehicles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of four methods under different block creation speeds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Spectrum Management in V2X with Social Roles,

    P.-Y . Chen, Y .-H. Zheng, I. Althamary, J.-L. Chern, and C.-W. Huang, “Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Spectrum Management in V2X with Social Roles,” in GLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 2023, pp. 2293–2298

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    6G for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and oppor- tunities,

    M. Noor-A-Rahim, Z. Liu, H. Lee, M. O. Khyam, J. He, D. Pesch, K. Moessner, W. Saad, and H. V . Poor, “6G for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and oppor- tunities,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 712–734, 2022

    2022

  3. [2]

    Toward Social Internet of Vehicles: Concept, Architecture, and Applications,

    K. M. Alam, M. Saini, and A. E. Saddik, “Toward Social Internet of Vehicles: Concept, Architecture, and Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 343–357, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    Vrepchain: A decentralized and privacy-preserving reputation system for social internet of vehicles based on blockchain,

    Y . Liu, Z. Xiong, Q. Hu, D. Niyato, J. Zhang, C. Miao, C. Leung, and Z. Tian, “Vrepchain: A decentralized and privacy-preserving reputation system for social internet of vehicles based on blockchain,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 13 242– 13 253, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    Blockchain integration for IoT-enabled V2X communications: a comprehensive survey, security issues and challenges,

    P. M. Rao, S. Jangirala, S. Pedada, A. K. Das, and Y . Park, “Blockchain integration for IoT-enabled V2X communications: a comprehensive survey, security issues and challenges,” IEEE Access , vol. 11, pp. 54 476–54 494, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    A comprehensive survey on the applications of blockchain for secur- ing vehicular networks,

    T. Alladi, V . Chamola, N. Sahu, V . Venkatesh, A. Goyal, and M. Guizani, “A comprehensive survey on the applications of blockchain for secur- ing vehicular networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1212–1239, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [6]

    Towards 6G V2X Sidelink: Survey of Resource Allocation—Mathematical Formulations, Challenges, and Pro- posed Solutions,

    Annu and P. Rajalakshmi, “Towards 6G V2X Sidelink: Survey of Resource Allocation—Mathematical Formulations, Challenges, and Pro- posed Solutions,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology , vol. 5, pp. 344–383, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    Spectrum Sharing in Vehicular Networks Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,

    L. Liang, H. Ye, and G. Y . Li, “Spectrum Sharing in Vehicular Networks Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2282–2292, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 23 references
  1. [8]

    Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Resources Allocation Method Using Dueling Double Deep Q-Network in Vehicular Networks,

    Y . Ji, Y . Wang, H. Zhao, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, H. Sari, and F. Adachi, “Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Resources Allocation Method Using Dueling Double Deep Q-Network in Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Secure Internet of Vehicles (IoV) with decentralized consensus blockchain mechanism,

    S. Tu, H. Yu, A. Badshah, M. Waqas, Z. Halim, and I. Ahmad, “Secure Internet of Vehicles (IoV) with decentralized consensus blockchain mechanism,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 11 227–11 236, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Edge-enabled Blockchain-based V2X Scheme for Secure Com- munication within the Smart City Development,

    S. Chavhan, S. Kumar, P. Tiwari, X. Liang, I. H. Lee, and K. Muham- mad, “Edge-enabled Blockchain-based V2X Scheme for Secure Com- munication within the Smart City Development,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Performance Evaluation of Blockchain Platforms,

    M. K. Gupta, R. K. Dwivedi, A. Sharma, M. Farooq et al., “Performance Evaluation of Blockchain Platforms,” in 2023 International Conference on IoT, Communication and Automation Technology (ICICAT) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  5. [13]

    Performance analysis of hyperledger besu in private blockchain,

    C. Fan, C. Lin, H. Khazaei, and P. Musilek, “Performance analysis of hyperledger besu in private blockchain,” in 2022 IEEE international conference on decentralized applications and infrastructures (DAPPS) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 64–73

    2022

  6. [14]

    Impacts of mobility on performance of blockchain in V ANET,

    S. Kim, “Impacts of mobility on performance of blockchain in V ANET,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 68 646–68 655, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Multi-channel blockchain scheme for internet of vehicles,

    L. Gao, C. Wu, T. Yoshinaga, X. Chen, and Y . Ji, “Multi-channel blockchain scheme for internet of vehicles,” IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, vol. 2, pp. 192–203, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    A Blockchain-Enabled Vehicular Edge Computing Framework for Secure Performance-oriented V2X Service Delivery,

    M. Fardad, G.-M. Muntean, and I. Tal, “A Blockchain-Enabled Vehicular Edge Computing Framework for Secure Performance-oriented V2X Service Delivery,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Blocksim: An extensible simulation tool for blockchain systems,

    M. Alharby and A. van Moorsel, “Blocksim: An extensible simulation tool for blockchain systems,” Frontiers in Blockchain, vol. 3, p. 28, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Blockchain for v2x: Applications and architectures,

    J. Meijers, P. Michalopoulos, S. Motepalli, G. Zhang, S. Zhang, A. Veneris, and H.-A. Jacobsen, “Blockchain for v2x: Applications and architectures,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology , vol. 3, pp. 193–209, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Starlink Satellite Elements,

    North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), “Starlink Satellite Elements,” http://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/, 2023, ac- cessed: August 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    V2X Services based on NR; User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; (Release 16),

    3GPP, “V2X Services based on NR; User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; (Release 16),” 3GPP, Tech. Rep., March 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    3GPP TR 38.821: Solutions for NR to support non-terrestrial networks (NTN),

    ——, “3GPP TR 38.821: Solutions for NR to support non-terrestrial networks (NTN),” 3GPP, Tech. Rep., April 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    An Effec- tive Framework of Private Ethereum Blockchain Networks for Smart Grid,

    D. H. Son, T. T. T. Quynh, T. V . Khoa, D. T. Hoang, N. L. Trung, N. V . Ha, D. Niyato, D. N. Nguyen, and E. Dutkiewicz, “An Effec- tive Framework of Private Ethereum Blockchain Networks for Smart Grid,” in 2021 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communicati...

    2021

  15. [23]

    Performance evaluation of blockchain systems: A systematic survey,

    C. Fan, S. Ghaemi, H. Khazaei, and P. Musilek, “Performance evaluation of blockchain systems: A systematic survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 126 927–126 950, 2020

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.