Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 12 references

Bird's-eye View of Molecular Gas across Stephan's Quintet Galaxy Group and Intra-group Medium

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that cold molecular gas in Stephan's Quintet forms a turbulent bridge spanning a ~700 km/s velocity gap between the active galaxy NGC 7319 and the shocked ridge, while the ridge itself hosts narrow-line settled cold gas.

desk verdict New ACA CO(2-1) mosaic gives the first uniform-sensitivity view of cold gas in Stephan's Quintet; the structural mapping holds up, but the 'settled ridge' and 700 km/s bridge claims need a short-spacing accounting. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14310 v1 pith:3CLI6I2G submitted 2024-11-21 astro-ph.GA

B. H. C. Emonts (1) , P. N. Appleton (2) , U. Lisenfeld (3) , P. Guillard (4) , C. K. Xu (5) , W. T. Reach (6) , L. Barcos-Munoz (1) , A. Labiano (8)
show 24 more authors
P. M. Ogle (9) E. O'Sullivan (10) A. Togi (11) S. C. Gallagher (12) P. Aromal (12) P.-A. Duc (13) K. Alatalo (9) F. Boulanger (14) T. Diaz-Santos (15) G. Helou (16) ((1) NRAO (2) Caltech/IPAC (3) Univ. Granada (4) IAP (5) NAOC (6) SSI (7) ESA (9) STScI (10) CfA (11) TXST (12) Western Univ. (13) ObAS (14) UPMC (15) FORTH (16) IPAC)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords ShocksGalaxycollisionsgroupsHicksoncompactgroupInteractinggalaxiesIntergalacticmediumCO(2-1)emissionAtacamaArray
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents the first uniform-sensitivity CO(2-1) survey of the inner ~70 kpc of the galaxy group Stephan's Quintet, made with the Atacama Compact Array and combined with archival CARMA CO(1-0) data. It aims to show that cold molecular gas across this violent, shock-dominated system is not simply a turbulent mess: along the famous intergalactic shock ridge the CO lines are narrow (FWHM 25-65 km/s), indicating settled cold gas, while a separate, turbulent molecular bridge stretches ~10 kpc between the active galaxy NGC 7319 and the ridge and covers a ~700 km/s gap in velocity. If right, the result links the warm molecular gas seen by JWST to the cold reservoir that feeds star formation and AGN activity, and shows that the cold phase can be kinematically decoupled from the warm shocked phase. The paper also estimates a total molecular mass of ~1.4e9 α_CO solar masses and finds a broad, blueshifted CO component at the NGC 7319 radio source consistent with a jet-driven outflow or turbulent gas in a dust lane.

What carries the argument

The central measurement is the matched-beam line-luminosity ratio r21 = L'_CO(2-1)/L'_CO(1-0), which tracks the excitation (temperature and density) of the cold gas; the ACA CO(2-1) mosaic provides the high-sensitivity spatial and kinematic map, while the CARMA CO(1-0) data (smoothed to the same 8'' x 7'' beam) supply the lower-J luminosity needed for the ratio. The argument also depends on the CO-to-H2 conversion factor α_CO to turn luminosities into masses, and on moment maps plus Gaussian spectral decomposition and position-velocity diagrams to identify coherent structures and bridge the velocity gap.

What would settle it

A single-dish or ALMA total-power CO observation sensitive to spatial scales beyond the ACA's ~14 kpc limit that recovers broad CO emission at 6500-7000 km/s along the ridge would falsify the claim that the ridge's cold gas is settled rather than turbulent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the cold molecular gas of Stephan's Quintet is organized into three distinct velocity systems: a low-velocity component belonging to the intruder galaxy NGC 7318b, a mid-velocity component along the shocked ridge, and a high-velocity component encompassing NGC 7319 and the northern star-forming region SQ-A. The central discovery is a low-surface-brightness bridge of CO emission that connects NGC 7319 to the ridge across ~10 kpc and bridges the ~700 km/s gap between these systems, with broad lines (FWHM ≈ 184 km/s in the bright part) indicating turbulence. Along the ridge itself, by contrast, the CO lines are unusually narrow, which the paper reads as evidence that the cold gas there has settled after being shocked and cooled by the intruding galaxy. Excitation measured by the matched-beam CO(2-1)/CO(1-0) luminosity ratio varies from ~0.3 in the bridge and SQ-A to ~0.5 along the ridge and near unity in the center of NGC 7319. The paper also reports a broad blueshifted CO component in the nucleus of NGC 7319 that coincides with the radio jet's northeastern hot spot, which it interprets as either a molecular outflow or turbulent gas interacting with the radio source.

Load-bearing premise

The maps assume the ACA mosaic recovers essentially all significant CO(2-1) emission from gas structures smaller than about 14 kpc and above the 4-sigma detection threshold, so any more diffuse, larger-scale gas would not dominate the detected emission.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the bridge is genuinely continuous in both space and velocity, then cold molecular gas can be transported between the active galaxy NGC 7319 and the shocked intra-group medium over ~10 kpc scales.
  • Narrow ridge CO lines imply that at least some of the cold gas in a shock-dominated environment is kinematically settled, so shock energy is dissipated without fully turbulizing the coldest phase.
  • The broad blueshifted CO component near the NGC 7319 radio source, whether outflow or jet-ISM interaction, removes the central molecular reservoir in region E1 on timescales of a few million years if it is an outflow.
  • The total molecular mass of ~1.4e9 α_CO solar masses, with ~30% outside the named regions, indicates a substantial diffuse cold component that single-region studies would miss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: higher-sensitivity ALMA 12m and total-power data should reveal whether the bridge is a single continuous structure or a chain of overlapping clouds; if the latter, the 'bridge' would be a projection effect rather than a true kinematic connection.
  • If confirmed, the settled ridge gas would support a picture in which the cold molecular phase survives shocks largely undisturbed, meaning shock models must concentrate their energy dissipation in the warm and ionized phases rather than the cold CO.
  • The low r21 in SQ-A and the bridge (≈0.3) hints at sub-thermally excited, lower-density gas; a dedicated CO(1-0) map with a uniform primary beam could test whether this is real or an artifact of CARMA's heterogeneous beam.
  • The ~30% diffuse CO component suggests the cold gas budget of Stephan's Quintet's intra-group medium may be larger than earlier single-dish catalogs implied, and could feed future star formation far from the galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents a large-scale CO(2-1) mosaic of Stephan's Quintet obtained with the ACA, combined with archival CARMA CO(1-0) data. The authors map the cold molecular gas distribution and kinematics across the group, identify a shocked ridge, a bridge towards NGC 7319, the star-forming region SQ-A, and gas in the interacting galaxies. They derive line widths, CO(2-1)/CO(1-0) excitation ratios, and a total molecular gas mass. The main claims are that the ridge contains narrow (FWHM ~25–65 km/s) 'settled' cold gas despite the presence of shocks in other phases, and that a turbulent molecular bridge connects NGC 7319 to the ridge, spanning a ~700 km/s velocity gap. They also report a broad, blueshifted CO component near the radio source in NGC 7319, possibly an outflow or jet-ISM interaction.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be the first uniform-sensitivity, large-scale CO(2-1) mapping of a compact group's intra-group medium, providing a key connection between JWST warm-H2 imaging and cold molecular gas. The matched-beam CARMA/ACA line-ratio analysis is a methodological improvement over earlier single-dish comparisons. The paper is also valuable for its explicit discussion of the limitations of ACA short-spacing coverage and its comparison with previous IRAM 30m data. However, the 'settled ridge gas' and '700 km/s bridge' claims rest on assumptions about the recovery of large-scale emission that are not fully quantified, and the proposed ALMA 12m follow-up cannot test the short-spacing problem.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 3.1, 4.1.1, 4.5] The claim that the ridge CO lines are narrow (FWHM ~25–65 km/s) and indicative of 'settled cold gas' is not secure given the ACA's missing short-spacing flux. As the authors acknowledge in Sect. 4.5, IRAM 30m single-dish observations show significantly broader CO profiles than the ACA in various regions, possibly tracing diffuse gas on scales ≳14 kpc (≳30") that the ACA resolves out. Because the ACA is insensitive to such large-scale emission, the detected ridge CO could be predominantly the clumpy, narrow-line component of a broader, more turbulent medium. The abstract and conclusions state the narrow-line interpretation without this caveat. The paper should either provide a quantitative estimate of the missing flux (e.g., by comparing IRAM and ACA integrated fluxes in the ridge regions) or explicitly qualify the 'settled gas' claim as applying only to the ACA-detected component. The planned ALMA 12m observations (Sect. 4.5) cannot resolve this issue because 12m arrays have even shorter maximum recoverable scales; only total-power or single-dish data can recover the missing flux.
  2. [Section 4.2] The total molecular gas mass, M_H2 = (1.4±0.1)×10^9 α_CO M_sun, is derived from the integrated ACA CO(2-1) flux under the implicit assumption that the ACA recovers essentially all significant emission. Given the acknowledged short-spacing problem (Sect. 4.5), this mass is at best a lower limit, and the quoted uncertainty reflects only statistical noise, not the systematic missing-flux uncertainty. The paper should state explicitly that the mass is a lower limit, or provide a quantitative completeness estimate based on the IRAM 30m comparison. This also affects the statement that ~30% of the gas is distributed outside the individually studied regions, since the missing diffuse component could change that fraction.
  3. [Section 3.2, Figure 4] The bridge claim—that CO emission stretches across ~10 kpc and ~700 km/s connecting NGC 7319 to the ridge—rests on faint, Hanning-smoothed emission whose contours in the position-velocity diagram start at 2σ. The authors note in Sect. 2.1 that limited (u,v) coverage produces low-level artifacts near strong emission, and the pseudo-slit in Fig. 4 passes very close to the bright E1 and B1 regions. It is therefore plausible that a significant part of the 2σ signal is a cleaned sidelobe or deconvolution artifact. The authors should quantify the expected artifact level (e.g., by inspecting negative contours at the same 2σ level in the same map, or by imaging a simulated point-source mosaic) and demonstrate that the claimed bridge emission is not contaminated. In addition, the 'full bridge' spectrum (Table A1) is extracted from a box that also includes E1 and S1, so the reported FWHM=561±31 km/s cannot be attributed to the bridge alone; a separated extraction is needed to support the 'turbulent bridge' interpretation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'FWHM~ 25−65 km s−1' should read 'FWHM ~ 25–65 km s−1' for consistency with the rest of the text.
  2. [Section 3 (introductory paragraph)] In the sentence 'we will described the observational results', 'described' should be 'describe'.
  3. [Figure A1 caption] The caption refers to 'regions R1 −R4', but the text and Table 1 define only R1, R2, and R3.
  4. [Figure A4 caption] The caption contains 'E1 −SE3'; this should be 'E1 − E3'.
  5. [Section 4.5] The phrase 'the shocking truth about the molecular gas' is a pun that may be better replaced with a neutral phrasing, though it is not confusing.
  6. [Table 1] In the column header, the notation 'v SCO(2−1)δv' is ambiguous; it would be clearer to use '∫S_CO δv' or a similar standard notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CO maps and kinematic claims are direct measurements, with the main caveat (missing short-spacing flux) explicitly acknowledged rather than hidden.

full rationale

This is an observational mapping paper whose central claims — the distribution of CO(2-1), the narrow ridge line widths, the ~700 km/s bridge connection, and the r21 excitation ratios — are measured directly from ACA and CARMA data. There is no fitted target result that is then relabeled as a prediction. The total molecular gas mass does use the paper's own luminosity-weighted average r21 = 0.51 to convert CO(2-1) luminosity to mass (Sect. 4.2), but this is a standard conversion assumption, not a claim that reduces to its own input. Similarly, the spectral analysis constrains CO(1-0) FWHM and velocity separations to match CO(2-1) (Appendix A), yet the r21 values are still fitted integrated-flux ratios and are not forced to unity. The paper explicitly acknowledges the key observational limitation in Sect. 4.5: IRAM 30m single-dish data show broader CO profiles that could come from diffuse gas on scales ≳14 kpc resolved out by the ACA, which is a completeness caveat rather than a circular derivation. No load-bearing argument depends on a self-citation; references to Appleton et al. (2023) and earlier work supply external JWST, Spitzer, and single-dish context, but the new interferometric measurements stand on their own. Therefore no circular step is present, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative claims (masses, excitation ratios, bridge velocity range) rest on standard CO luminosity conversions and on assumptions about what the ACA can recover. No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced, and the central morphological and kinematic picture does not require a fitted model.

free parameters (3)
  • r21 used for total mass from CO(2-1) = 0.51 ± 0.05 (luminosity-weighted average)
    Used to convert the integrated CO(2-1) flux to total H2 mass, assuming the 30% of emission outside the fitted regions has the average excitation.
  • r21 assumed for regions E2/E3 = 0.5
    CARMA CO(1-0) observations are unreliable beyond the 35% primary beam level, so masses for E2/E3 are estimated from CO(2-1) assuming the average excitation.
  • alpha_CO (CO-to-H2 conversion factor) = 1 in quoted masses; range 0.4 to 4 cited from literature
    Needed to convert CO(1-0) luminosity to molecular gas mass; not measured or constrained by this paper, and all masses are given as a function of alpha_CO.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ACA mosaic recovers essentially all significant CO(2-1) emission on angular scales below about 30 arcsec and above the 4-sigma masking threshold.
    Section 2.1 gives the largest angular scale; Section 4.5 acknowledges that diffuse large-scale CO seen by single-dish observations may be resolved out, which would affect the total mass and the narrow CO line widths in the ridge.
  • ad hoc to paper CO(1-0) and CO(2-1) trace the same kinematic gas components, so the FWHM of CO(1-0) lines was fixed to match CO(2-1) in the Gaussian fitting.
    Appendix A states that the low signal-to-noise of the CARMA data forced this constraint, which can bias the derived r21 line ratios and gas masses.
  • domain assumption A single distance of 94 Mpc (z = 0.0215) applies to all detected structures.
    Section 1 assumes this distance to convert angular scales to kiloparsecs and to compute line luminosities; individual group members may have slightly different distances.
  • domain assumption The CO-to-H2 conversion factor alpha_CO is uniform across the group.
    Section 4.2 quotes a range of alpha_CO from the literature and presents masses as a function of it; shocked or outflowing gas may have a different conversion factor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bird's-eye View of Molecular Gas across Stephan's Quintet Galaxy Group and Intra-group Medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3CLI6I2G

@misc{pith2026241114310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bird's-eye View of Molecular Gas across Stephan's Quintet Galaxy Group and Intra-group Medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3CLI6I2G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14310}
}
abstract

We present the large-scale distribution and kinematics of cold molecular gas across the compact galaxy group Stephan's Quintet, based on CO(2-1) observations performed with the Atacama Compact Array (ACA) and CO(1-0) data from the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA). We find coherent structures of molecular gas associated with the galaxies and intra-group medium, which follow the distribution of warm H$_{2}$ previously seen with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). CO is associated with a ridge of shocked gas that crosses the galaxy group, and with a spiral arm of the intruding galaxy NGC7318b, which interacts with the intra-group medium along the ridge. Although the ridge contains widespread shocks, turbulent gas, and warm H$_{2}$, the CO lines are narrower than elsewhere in Stephan's Quintet (FWHM~25-65 km/s), indicative of settled cold gas. At a distinctly different velocity, CO is found in the active galaxy NGC7319 and Northern star-forming region SQ-A. A bridge of turbulent molecular gas connects NGC7319 with the ridge, covering a gap of ~700 km/s between these structures. The gas excitation ranges from $L'_{\rm CO(2-1)}$/$L'_{\rm CO(1-0)}$ ~ 0.3 in the bridge and SQ-A, to ~0.5 along the ridge, to near unity in the center of NGC7319. We also detect either a molecular outflow or turbulent molecular gas associated with the radio source in NGC7319. These ACA data are part of a program with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and JWST to study molecular gas physics from the largest to the smallest scales across the intra-group medium of Stephan's Quintet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14310 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. CO emission in Stephan’s Quintet. Left (a): Red contours of the integrated CO (2-1) emission obtained with the ACA (resolution 8′′ × 7 ′′), superimposed on a 10µm inverted gray-scale image obtained with JWST MIRI in the F1000W band (Pontoppidan et al. 2022; Pontoppidan & Gordon 2022). Contours levels start at 0.41 Jy beam−1 km s−1 and increase by a factor √ 2. As shown by Appleton et al. (2023), the background image… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Total intensity (moment 0) map of the CO(2-1) emission obtained with the ACA. Contour levels start at 0.4 Jy bm−1 × km s−1 and increase by a factor √ 2. The background is an archival image taken with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) using the B-band F438W filter (Fedotov et al. 2011). The different regions that we describe in this paper are annotated, while the small crosses indicate… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. CO(2-1) spectra from the ACA data in the regions indicated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CO(2-1) emission observed with the ACA across the bridge. To visualize the faint signal, the data were binned by two channels to a channel width of 10 km s−1 and subse￾quently Hanning smoothed to an effective velocity resolution of 20 km s−1 . Top: CO(2-1) spectrum alo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CO(2-1) emission observed with the ACA in NGC 7319. Left: Spectrum of the central region E1, with overlaid a model (orange line) that consist of two Gaussian component (dashed orange lines). Residuals after subtracting the model from the spectrum are given at the botto…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CO(2-1) emission observed with the ACA in SQ-A. Left: Position-velocity plot taken along the solid line in the middle panel, after Hanning smoothing the data. Contour levels start at 2.5σ and increase with 1σ, with σ = 0.08 mJy beam−1 . Component a is CO(2-1) emission …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kinematic structures of the cold molecular gas in Stephan’s Quintet. Shown is a JWST/F090W image of Stephan’s Quintet (Pontoppidan et al. 2022; Pontoppidan & Gordon 2022), with overlaid contours of total intensity CO(2-1) emission inte￾grated across three velocity rang…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic overview of the observed properties of the various regions and structures, based on the Gaussian fit￾ting presented in Tables 1 and A1. Plotted on the horizontal axis is the central velocity of the CO(2-1) emission in each region listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Artistic rendering of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [80]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 585

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/80 Renaud, F., Athanassoula, E., Amram, P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 585. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2360 Riechers, D. A., Carilli, C. L., Maddalena, R. J., et al. 2011, ApJL, 739, L32. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L32 Rodr ´ ıguez-Baras, M., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., D ´ ıaz, A. I., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 495. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu851...

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0612759 2018

  2. [140]

    S., et al

    doi:10.1086/117767 Aoki, K., Kosugi, G., Wilson, A. S., et al. 1999, ApJ, 521,

    doi:10.1086/117767 1999

  3. [434]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 64

    doi:10.1086/168252 Egusa, F., Gao, Y., Morokuma-Matsui, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 64. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8050 Emonts, B. H. C., Lehnert, M. D., Lebowitz, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 148. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde53 Esposito, F., Vallini, L., Pozzi, F., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 686. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac313 Fedotov, K., Gallagher, S. C., Konstantopo...

    arXiv 2022

  4. [471]

    2021, ApJ, 909, 56

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041330 Liu, D., Daddi, E., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 56. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd801 Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Janssen, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A134. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936803 Maeda, F., Egusa, F., Ohta, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 96. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4505 Moles, M., Marquez, I., & Sulentic, J. W. 1998, A&A, 334,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041330 2021

  5. [473]

    The Observational Status of Stephan's Quintet

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9802328 Montoya Arroyave, I., Cicone, C., Andreani, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A47. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348292 Ogle, P., Boulanger, F., Guillard, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724,

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9802328 2024

  6. [565]

    N., Xu, K

    doi:10.1086/307559 Appleton, P. N., Xu, K. C., Reach, W., et al. 2006, ApJL, 639, L51. doi:10.1086/502646 Appleton, P. N., Guillard, P., Boulanger, F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 66. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/66 Appleton, P. N., Guillard, P., Togi, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 76. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/76 Appleton, P. N., Guillard, P., Emonts, B., et al...

    work page doi:10.1086/307559 2006

  7. [624]

    N., & Xu, C

    doi:10.1086/163839 Renaud, F., Appleton, P. N., & Xu, C. K. 2010, ApJ, 724,

    work page doi:10.1086/163839 2010

  8. [677]

    W., Rosado, M., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., et al

    doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.051804.102221 Sulentic, J. W., Rosado, M., Dultzin-Hacyan, D., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2993. doi:10.1086/324455 Tadhunter, C., Holt, J., Gonz´ alez Delgado, R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 960. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17958.x Trinchieri, G., Sulentic, J., Breitschwerdt, D., et al. 2003, A&A, 401, 173. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200...

    arXiv 2001

Show all 12 references
  1. [686]

    M., Combes, F., Oosterloo, T., et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/686 Dasyra, K. M., Combes, F., Oosterloo, T., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, L7. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629689 Downes, D. & Solomon, P. M. 1998, ApJ, 507, 615. doi:10.1086/306339 Duc, P.-A., Cuillandre, J.-C., & Renaud, F. 2018, MNRAS, 475, L40. doi:10.10...

    2016 doi

  2. [823]

    2004, A&A, 426,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021232 Lisenfeld, U., Braine, J., Duc, P.-A., et al. 2004, A&A, 426,

    2004 doi

  3. [1193]

    B., Morganti, R., et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/1193 Cold Molecular Gas across Stephan’s Quintet 23 Oosterloo, T., Raymond Oonk, J. B., Morganti, R., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A38. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731781 O’Sullivan, E., Giacintucci, S., Vrtilek, J. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1560. doi:10.10...

    2017

  4. [4670]

    2002, A&A, 394,

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4670 Lisenfeld, U., Braine, J., Duc, P.-A., et al. 2002, A&A, 394,

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.