Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On the geometry of K\"ahler--Frobenius manifolds and their classification

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that every compact complex Kähler manifold with vanishing curvature is a Hermitian Frobenius manifold, satisfying the WDVV equations.

desk verdict The central claim fails on its headline example: the proposed Frobenius multiplication vanishes identically on flat complex tori, so the paper does not establish any new Frobenius structure. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14362 v2 pith:S7RHZSIU submitted 2024-11-21 math.DG math.AG

Noémie. C. Combe This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AG MSC 53A1553B0553C0753C5553D4514K25
keywords FrobeniusmanifoldsHermitianWDVVequationflatKählerbundlescomplextoriHantzsche–WendtthetafunctionsChernclasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that every compact complex Kähler manifold with vanishing curvature is a Hermitian Frobenius manifold, a structure that geometrizes the WDVV equations of two-dimensional topological field theory. Concretely, the tangent space at every point should carry a commutative associative algebra with a compatible metric, and the structure constants should come from third derivatives of a potential. If the claim is right, then every flat compact Kähler manifold—meaning every quotient of a complex torus by a finite group acting freely—is automatically a solution of the WDVV associativity equations. The paper goes on to classify these manifolds as complex tori, quotients of tori without translations, generalized Hantzsche–Wendt manifolds, hyperelliptic manifolds, and certain Calabi–Yau manifolds, and it derives concrete counts in low dimensions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Hermitian WDVV equation (1.2.0.1), a complex analogue of the WDVV associativity equation, together with the newly introduced notion of a Frobenius bundle—a flat algebra bundle whose fibres are Frobenius algebras and whose structure constants are derived from third derivatives of a potential. The argument moves between three equivalent descriptions: the Hermitian WDVV equation, a Hermitian Frobenius manifold, and a Frobenius bundle. Associativity of the multiplication is tied to flatness of the pencil of connections $\lambda\nabla = {}^0\nabla + \lambda(X\circ Y)$, and for Kähler metrics the curvature tensor identity $R_{X,Y}(Z) = X\circ(Y\circ Z) - Y\circ(X\circ Z)$ is used to connect vanishing curvature to the WDVV equation.

What would settle it

Choose a flat compact Kähler manifold with nontrivial holonomy, such as a hyperelliptic surface, write its local Kähler potential explicitly, and plug the resulting third derivatives into both sides of (1.2.0.1). A single choice of indices where the two sides differ would show that vanishing curvature does not imply the Hermitian WDVV equation, breaking Theorem 4.1.0.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4.1.0.1: a compact complex Kähler manifold with vanishing curvature is a Hermitian Frobenius manifold. The proof first shows that such a manifold admits a holomorphic affine connection, then defines a multiplication on the tangent sheaf from the Christoffel symbols, and then argues that the Kähler metric makes each tangent space a Frobenius algebra. The final step identifies a vanishing-curvature identity for the metric with the Hermitian WDVV equation. On this foundation the paper asserts a classification of all Kähler–Frobenius manifolds of dimension $n>1$, reports that there are eight such surfaces and 174 such threefolds, and proves that the affine-geometry conjecture on vanishing top Chern class holds for (pre-)Frobenius manifolds. It also claims a direct relationship between certain classes of these manifolds and theta functions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the vanishing-curvature identity (4.1.0.4), a second-order equation for the Kähler metric, is equivalent to the Hermitian WDVV equation (1.2.0.1), an equation built from products of third derivatives of the potential; that equivalence is asserted in the proof and is not established by the surrounding argument.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every flat compact Kähler manifold carries a Frobenius algebra structure on its tangent sheaf and satisfies the Hermitian WDVV equation.
  • The class of Kähler–Frobenius manifolds is classified by the list of flat Kähler manifolds: complex tori, quotients $T/G$ by finite groups without translations, generalized orientable Hantzsche–Wendt manifolds, hyperelliptic manifolds, and a family of Calabi–Yau manifolds.
  • In low dimensions there are finitely many Kähler–Frobenius manifolds: eight surfaces and 174 compact threefolds.
  • For (pre-)Frobenius manifolds, all Chern classes vanish, so the classical affine-geometry conjecture on vanishing Euler characteristic holds in this setting.
  • The pencil of connections on the tangent bundle of a Kähler–Frobenius manifold with trivial canonical bundle and vanishing first Chern class is a pencil of Hermitian–Einstein connections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the main theorem is correct, the WDVV equations are automatically satisfied by every flat compact Kähler manifold, so the WDVV condition adds no new restriction beyond flatness in the compact Kähler setting.
  • The claimed equivalence between the curvature identity (4.1.0.4) and the Hermitian WDVV equation (1.2.0.1) is the step most worth testing directly: one could compute both sides on a concrete flat Kähler surface with nontrivial holonomy and compare them index by index.
  • The Frobenius-bundle formalism suggests that the same package of definitions might extend to manifolds modeled on other finite-dimensional algebras, though the paper does not construct such examples.
  • If the theta-function link survives close inspection, it would provide explicit flat coordinates and potentials for quotients $T/G$, connecting the geometric classification to number-theoretic data such as level structures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims that every compact flat Kähler manifold carries a Hermitian Frobenius manifold structure, and on this basis classifies the resulting "Kähler–Frobenius manifolds" (complex tori, quotients T/G, generalized Hantzsche–Wendt manifolds, hyperelliptic manifolds, and certain Calabi–Yau manifolds). It introduces a "Frobenius bundle" formalism and a "Hermitian WDVV equation" (Eq. 2.3.0.1), proves a Chern-conjecture statement for pre-Frobenius manifolds, studies Kähler surfaces, and connects the construction to theta functions. The central construction in Theorem 4.1.0.1 defines the multiplication on the holomorphic tangent sheaf via Christoffel symbols of the Kähler metric and then uses the flatness of the metric to deduce the WDVV equation.

Significance. If the central theorem were sound, the paper would give a new bridge between flat Kähler geometry and Frobenius-manifold/TQFT theory, and the classification in Theorem 7.1.0.1 would be a useful list. The paper also usefully collects the classification of flat Kähler manifolds and explicitly discusses which Kodaira classes of surfaces can qualify. However, the central construction is invalid: the proposed invariant bilinear form is zero on the holomorphic tangent algebra, the proposed multiplication is identically zero on complex tori, and the asserted equivalence between metric flatness and the Hermitian WDVV equation is not established. Since the classification, the Chern-conjecture claim, and the theta-function discussion all rest on Theorem 4.1.0.1, the significance of the paper as written is not established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 4.1.0.1, proof step 5] The proof explicitly computes g(∂a ∘ ∂b, ∂c) = g(∂a, ∂b ∘ ∂c) = ∂a∂b∂cΦ = 0 on T^{1,0}M and the analogous vanishing on T^{0,1}M. Thus the invariant bilinear form is identically zero on each of the two summands. A Frobenius algebra as defined in Section 2.5.2 requires a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form satisfying (2.5.2.1), so the algebras constructed on T^{1,0}M and T^{0,1}M are not Frobenius algebras. The sentence that a direct sum of Frobenius algebras is a Frobenius algebra does not apply, because the individual factors do not have non-degenerate forms.
  2. [Theorem 4.1.0.1, proof step 5; Theorem 7.1.0.1] On a complex torus T = C^n/Λ with the flat Kähler metric written in affine coordinates, the Levi-Civita Christoffel symbols Γ^c_{ab} vanish. With the definition ∂a ∘ ∂b = Γ^c_{ab}∂c, the multiplication is identically zero. A Frobenius algebra is unital by the definition recalled in Section 2 (see also Section 2.5.2), and the zero multiplication admits no unit. Hence the proof does not even produce a Frobenius algebra on the principal advertised example, and the classification theorem that relies on this construction is unsupported.
  3. [Lemma 3.2.5.1 and Theorem 4.1.0.1, proof step 7] The claimed equivalence between vanishing curvature and the Hermitian WDVV equation is not proved. Setting the Kähler curvature expression (4.1.0.1) to zero gives the second-order identity (4.1.0.4) for derivatives of the metric, whereas the Hermitian WDVV equation (2.3.0.1) is an identity involving products of third derivatives of the Kähler potential with inverse metric factors. No derivation of (2.3.0.1) from (4.1.0.4) is given. On a flat torus the identity (2.3.0.1) is vacuous because all third derivatives vanish, yet the algebraic structure from step 5 is still the zero algebra; step 7 therefore cannot repair the algebraic failure.
  4. [Lemma 3.2.5.1; Proposition 5.1.0.1] The proof of associativity is circular. Equation (3.2.5.1) asserts R_{X,Y}(Z) = X ∘ (Y ∘ Z) − Y ∘ (X ∘ Z), which is precisely the statement that the associator of the proposed multiplication is the curvature of the connection defining the multiplication. This is the content of the flatness/associativity equivalence that must be proved, not an identity available before the Frobenius structure is established. The same pattern is repeated in the proof of Proposition 5.1.0.1, where the vanishing of the curvature is used to conclude X ∘ (Y ∘ Z) = (X ∘ Y) ∘ Z.
  5. [Theorem 7.4.0.1, proof] The proof that the pencil of connections is Hermitian–Einstein is not valid as written. The Hermitian–Yang–Mills/Hermitian–Einstein condition is tr(F) = κ Id for a constant κ, not merely tr(F) = 0. The text states that "by hypothesis" the curvature of each deformed connection is flat because the manifold is Frobenius; but the flatness of the pencil of connections is exactly the associativity condition under investigation and is not established. Thus the conclusion that the pencil consists of Hermitian–Einstein connections does not follow.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.2.0.1) and Eq. (3.2.2.2)] The displayed Hermitian metrics are missing wedge products and conjugate differentials; as written ds^2 = g_{a\bar b} dz^a dz^b is not the standard Hermitian metric.
  2. [Theorem 6.2.0.1 and table] The theorem states that there are eight compact Kähler Frobenius surfaces, but the table in Section 6.2 lists seven rows; the counting and the classification should be reconciled.
  3. [Section 6.3.2] The section heading and table use the notation "VIII0" where the surrounding text describes class VII0 surfaces; this appears to be a typo.
  4. [References] The reference [H97] is listed twice with different titles ("Non-linear problems in geometry" and "Frobenius manifolds"); the bibliography should be cleaned up.
  5. [Lemma 3.2.5.1] In the last paragraph of the proof, the Hermitian WDVV equation is referred to as "Equation ??"; it should be Eq. (2.3.0.1).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Central claim 'flat compact Kähler ⇒ Frobenius' is circular: the proof defines the multiplication via the flat connection, equates the curvature tensor with the associator, and renames the vanishing-curvature equation as the Hermitian WDVV equation; on the paper's own headline example the product is identically zero.

  1. self definitional [Lemma 3.2.5.1, proof, Eq. (3.2.5.1)]
    "The curvature tensor R_{X,Y}(Z) obeys to the following: (3.2.5.1) R_{X,Y}(Z) = X ◦ (Y ◦ Z) − Y ◦ (X ◦ Z) given vector fields X, Y, Z ∈ T^{1,0}M (or respectively X, Y, Z ∈ T^{0,1}M). Therefore, R_{X,Y}(Z) = 0 if and only if the associator A = 0 i.e. X ◦ (Y ◦ Z) = Y ◦ (X ◦ Z)."

    By the paper's own definition, the multiplication is induced by the covariant derivative (∇_X Y := X∘Y), so the associator on the right is not the curvature tensor of the metric; the genuine curvature is R_{X,Y}Z = ∇_X∇_Y Z − ∇_Y∇_X Z − ∇_{[X,Y]}Z. Writing R as the associator makes the hypothesis 'vanishing curvature' mean, by definition, associativity of the product. Thus the hard part of Theorem 4.1.0.1—showing flatness implies a Frobenius algebra—is built into this displayed identity rather than derived.

  2. renaming known result [Theorem 4.1.0.1, proof, step 7, Eqs. (4.1.0.2)–(4.1.0.4)]
    "By hypothesis, the curvature tensor vanishes i.e. R_{a¯bc ¯d} = 0 . Therefore, Equation 4.1.0.1 is equivalent to (4.1.0.2) ∂²g_{a¯b}/∂z^c∂ ¯z^d = ∂g_{a¯f}/∂z^c g^{¯fe} ∂g_{e¯b}/∂ ¯z^d. ... The equation 4.1.0.4 corresponds to ∂cg¯f age¯f ∂ ¯dg¯be = ∂cg¯bege¯f ∂ ¯f g¯da, which is a hermitian WDVV equation."

    Equation (4.1.0.2) is literally the flatness condition R=0 rewritten; Equation (4.1.0.4) is the same identity with indices permuted. Calling it the Hermitian WDVV equation (1.2.0.1) renames the hypothesis as the conclusion. The actual WDVV equation is an associativity condition on products of third derivatives of the potential, and the paper supplies no argument converting metric flatness into that associativity. The construction fails already on complex tori, where flat coordinates give Γ^c_{ab}=0, hence ∂a∘∂b=0 and no unit.

full rationale

The central implication of Theorem 4.1.0.1 is not derived from independent input. Step 3 of its proof defines the Frobenius multiplication as ∂a∘∂b=Σ Γ^c_{ab}∂c, using the Levi-Civita connection of the Kähler metric. Step 5 observes that on T^{1,0} the Kähler pairing satisfies g(∂a∘∂b,∂c)=∂a∂b∂cΦ=0, i.e. the proposed invariant form vanishes on the holomorphic subalgebra; this does not yield a Frobenius algebra, which requires a non-degenerate pairing and a unit. Step 7 then takes the zero-curvature equation of the metric and declares it a Hermitian WDVV equation. That is a renaming: (4.1.0.2)/(4.1.0.4) is exactly R=0, whereas (1.2.0.1) is an associativity condition. The same reduction appears in Lemma 3.2.5.1, where R_{X,Y}(Z) is written equal to the associator X∘(Y∘Z)−Y∘(X∘Z), making 'flatness ⇒ associativity' true by definition. On the headline example of the paper, T=C^n/Λ with a constant flat Kähler metric, Γ^c_{ab}=0 in affine coordinates, so ∂a∘∂b=0: the algebra has no unit and Theorem 4.1.0.1 fails, confirming that the 'prediction' has no content beyond the hypothesis. The classification theorem 7.1.0.1 does rely on external classifications of flat Kähler manifolds [DHS,R], so the listed classes are not themselves circular; the circularity lies in the claim that they are Frobenius. Overall score 8: the central result is forced by the definitional identification of curvature with the associator and by renaming the flatness equation as the WDVV equation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on several imported theorems and two ad hoc assumptions. The imported theorems (Kobayashi, DHS classification, Fischer-Wolf splitting) are legitimate domain knowledge. The ad hoc assumptions are that a Hermitian Kähler metric is a valid invariant bilinear form for a Frobenius algebra, and that Christoffel symbols define a tensorial multiplication; both are false and are the source of the proof's collapse.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Kobayashi's theorem: a compact Kähler manifold with holomorphic affine structure has vanishing Chern classes
    Used in Theorem 4.2.0.1 and Proposition 5.1.0.1 to conclude Chern class vanishing for pre-Frobenius manifolds.
  • domain assumption Classification of flat Kähler manifolds (DHS, Rogov)
    Used as the foundation of Theorem 7.1.0.1, which lists known families of flat Kähler manifolds.
  • domain assumption Fischer-Wolf splitting theorem for c1=0 Kähler manifolds
    Used in Proposition 5.2.0.1 to describe the finite cover structure of Kähler manifolds with vanishing first Chern class.
  • ad hoc to paper The Kähler metric can be used as the invariant bilinear form of a Frobenius algebra
    Assumed in Definitions 3.2.4.1 and used in Theorem 4.1.0.1; this is false because the Hermitian form is not a symmetric bilinear form and vanishes on holomorphic vectors.
  • ad hoc to paper The Christoffel symbols of the Levi-Civita connection define a tensorial multiplication
    Used in Theorem 4.1.0.1 step 3; Christoffel symbols transform as a connection, not a tensor, so the multiplication is not well-defined.
invented entities (1)
  • Frobenius bundle
    purpose: Reformulation of Frobenius manifold data as an algebra bundle, claimed to be a more practical formalism
    The paper introduces this object as a new tool, but it is a repackaging of existing Frobenius manifold axioms without new falsifiable predictions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the geometry of K\"ahler--Frobenius manifolds and their classification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7RHZSIU

@misc{pith2026241114362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the geometry of K\"ahler--Frobenius manifolds and their classification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7RHZSIU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14362}
}
abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that flat compact K\"ahler manifolds exhibit the structure of a Frobenius manifold, a structure originating in 2D Topological Quantum Field Theory and closely related to Joyce structure. As a result, we classify all such manifolds. It can be deduced that K\"ahler--Frobenius manifolds include certain Calabi--Yau manifolds, complex tori $T=\mathbb{C}^n/\mathbb{Z}^n$, generalized (orientable) Hantzsche--Wendt manifolds, hyperelliptic manifolds and manifolds of type $T/G$, where $G$ is a finite group acting on $T$ freely and containing no translations. An explicit study is provided for the two-dimensional case. Additionally, we can prove that Chern's conjecture for K\"ahler pre-Frobenius manifolds holds. Lastly, we establish that certain classes of K\"ahler-Frobenius manifolds share a direct relationship with theta functions which are important objects in number theory as well as complex analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14362 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Relations between spaces [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. pre-Frobenius versus Frobenius algebras 2.5.4. Algebra bundle. A bundle algebra with base M is a vector bundle E = (E (A ), M, π) endowed with a bilinear morphism such that each fiber Ex = π −1 (x) for any x ∈ M is endowed with the structure of the algebra A . Given x ∈ M, if the algebra Ax has an identity element ϵx then the mapping x 7→ ϵx is a unit section of E . Algebra bundles can be obtained as a result of lef… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maximum Likelihood, permutohedra and Associativity Equations

    math.AG 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper asserts that concentration cones and diagonal spectrahedra carry Frobenius and Monge-Ampere structures, with maximum likelihood degree indexed by Frobenius residuals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bridgeland Geometry from Donaldson-Thomas invariants

    T. Bridgeland Geometry from Donaldson-Thomas invariants. Integrability, Quantization, and Geometry (pp.1-66). American Mathematical Society (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    N. C. Combe Landau--Ginzburg models, Monge--Ampère domains and (pre-)Frobenius manifolds, arXiv:2409.00835

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    N. C. Combe, Yu. Manin F--manifolds and geometry of information, Bull. LMS, 52 , Issue 5 (2020), pp.777-792

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Cotti, B.Dubrovin, D

    G. Cotti, B.Dubrovin, D. Guzzetti Local Moduli of Semisimple Frobenius Coalescent Structure SIGMA 16 (2020), 040, 105 pages

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Dubrovin Geometry of 2D topological field theories , Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups 1620 (1993) pp.120--348

    B. Dubrovin Geometry of 2D topological field theories , Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups 1620 (1993) pp.120--348

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    Szczepanski K\"ahler flat manifolds , J

    K.Dekimpe, M Halenda, A. Szczepanski K\"ahler flat manifolds , J. Mathem. Soc. of Japan 61 (2009), no. 2, pp.363–377

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Dijkgraaf, H

    R. Dijkgraaf, H. Verlinde, E. Verlinde, Topological strings in d < 1 Nucl. Phys. B, 352 (1991) pp.59--86

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    In: Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups (Authors: R.Donagi, B.Dubrovin, E.Frenkel, E.Previato), Eds

    Geometry of 2D topological field theories . In: Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups (Authors: R.Donagi, B.Dubrovin, E.Frenkel, E.Previato), Eds. M.Francaviglia, S.Greco, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 1620 (1996), pp.120 -- 348

    work page 1996

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    M. V. Feigin Trigonometric Solutions of WDVV Equations and Generalized Calogero--Moser--Sutherland Systems SIGMA 5 (2009), 088, 10 pages

    2009

  2. [10]

    Hitchin Non-linear problems in geometry

    N. Hitchin Non-linear problems in geometry . Conference held at Katata, September 3–8, 1979. Proceedings of the 6th international Taniguchi symposium (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    Hitchin Frobenius manifolds

    N. Hitchin Frobenius manifolds. In: Hurtubise, J., Lalonde, F., Sabidussi, G. (eds) Gauge Theory and Symplectic Geometry. NATO ASI Series, vol 488. Springer, Dordrecht. (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    Katzarkov, M

    L. Katzarkov, M. Kontsevich, T. Pantev Hodge theoretic aspects of mirror symmetry Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics vol. 78 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Konopelchenko F

    B.G. Konopelchenko F. Magri Coisotropic deformations of associative algebras and dispersionless integrable hierarchies Commun. Math. Phys. 274 , pp. 627–658 (2007)

    2007

  6. [14]

    Kontsevich, Yu

    M. Kontsevich, Yu. I. Manin, Gromov--Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry , Comm. Math. Phys. 164:3 (1994) pp. 525--562

    1994

  7. [15]

    Yu. I. Manin Three constructions of Frobenius manifolds: a comparative study, Asian J. Math. 3:1 (1999) (Atiyah's Festschrift), pp.179--220

    1999

  8. [16]

    Yu. I. Manin Manifolds with multiplication on the tangent sheaf , Rend. Mat. Appl. 7, 26:1 (2006), pp.69–85

    2006

  9. [17]

    Fischer, J

    A. Fischer, J. Wolf The structure of compact Ricci-flat Riemannian manifolds. J. Diff. Geometry 10 (1975) pp. 277-288

    1975

  10. [18]

    M. Blom, H. Nordell, J. Rowlett, O. Thim, J. Vahnberg Crystallographic Groups, Strictly Tessellating Polytopes, and Analytic Eigenfunctions. The American Mathematical Monthly, (2021) 128(5), pp. 387–406

    2021

  11. [19]

    Hasegawa A class of compact K\"ahlerian solvmanifolds and a general conjecture , Geometriae Dedicata, 78 (1999), pp

    K. Hasegawa A class of compact K\"ahlerian solvmanifolds and a general conjecture , Geometriae Dedicata, 78 (1999), pp. 253-258

    1999

  12. [20]

    F. E. A. Johnson Flat algebraic manifolds , Geometry of low-dimensional manifolds 1, (Durham 1989), London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Ser. 150, Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, (1990), pp.73-91

    1990

  13. [21]

    Joyce Holomorphic generating functions for invariants counting coherent sheaves on Calabi-Yau 3-folds, Geom

    D. Joyce Holomorphic generating functions for invariants counting coherent sheaves on Calabi-Yau 3-folds, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), pp. 667–725

    2007

  14. [22]

    Kobayashi Geometry of bounded domains Transaction of the Amercian Maths Soc

    S. Kobayashi Geometry of bounded domains Transaction of the Amercian Maths Soc. (1959) vol 377 No 12

    1959

  15. [23]

    Kobayashi On holomorphic connections in Global Differential Geometry and Global Analysis Edited by A

    S. Kobayashi On holomorphic connections in Global Differential Geometry and Global Analysis Edited by A. Dold and B. Eckmann, 838, Proceedings of the Colloquium Held at the Technical University of Berlin, November 21--24, (1979)

    1979

  16. [24]

    Kobayashi First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields

    S. Kobayashi First Chern class and holomorphic tensor fields. Nagoya Mathematical Journal. (1980); 77:5-11

    1980

  17. [25]

    Kobayashi Curvature and stability of vector bundles

    S. Kobayashi Curvature and stability of vector bundles . Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series A, Mathematical Sciences. (1982) 58 (4): pp.158–162

    1982

  18. [26]

    Yu. I. Manin Frobenius Manifolds, Quantum Cohomology, and Moduli Spaces . (1999) AMS Colloquium Publications, Volume 47

    1999

  19. [27]

    Yu. I. Manin Three constructions of Frobenius manifolds: a comparative study. (1999) Asian Journal of Mathematics, 3(1), pp.179-220

    1999

  20. [28]

    Miyaoka K\"ahler metrics on elliptic surfaces Proc

    Y. Miyaoka K\"ahler metrics on elliptic surfaces Proc. Japan Acad. 50(8): pp.533-536 (1974)

    1974

  21. [29]

    Rogov Non-algebraic deformations of flat K\"ahler manifolds Math

    V. Rogov Non-algebraic deformations of flat K\"ahler manifolds Math. Res. Lett. Volume 29, Number 4, 1229–1250, (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Sabbah Isomonodromic Deformations and Frobenius manifolds: An introduction Springer sciences & business media (2007)

    C. Sabbah Isomonodromic Deformations and Frobenius manifolds: An introduction Springer sciences & business media (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Totaro The curvature of a Hessian metric, International Journal of Mathematics Vol

    B. Totaro The curvature of a Hessian metric, International Journal of Mathematics Vol. 15, No. 4 (2004) pp.369--391 World Scientific Publishing Company

    2004

  24. [32]

    Umehara Einstein--K\"ahler submanifolds of a complex linear or hyperbolic space , Tohoku Math

    M. Umehara Einstein--K\"ahler submanifolds of a complex linear or hyperbolic space , Tohoku Math. J. 3 9 (1987), pp.385--389

    1987

  25. [33]

    Uhlenbeck, S

    K. Uhlenbeck, S. Yau On the existence of Hermitean Yang-Mills-connections on stable bundles over Kähler manifolds, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 39 (1986) pp. 257-293

    1986

  26. [34]

    Witten The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian (1993) Geometry, topology, & physics, Conf

    E. Witten The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian (1993) Geometry, topology, & physics, Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, IV, Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 357–422

    1993

  27. [35]

    Witten On the structure of the topological phase of two-dimensional gravity , Nucl

    E. Witten On the structure of the topological phase of two-dimensional gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 340 issues 2-3, (1990), pp.281--332

    1990

  28. [36]

    Bochner K

    S. Bochner K. Yano Curvature and Betti numbers , Annals of Mathematics Studies Number 32 (1953)

    1953

  29. [37]

    Yau Calabi's conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry , Proc

    T. Yau Calabi's conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry , Proc . Nat . Acad . Sci. USA 74 (1977) pp.1798--1799

    1977

  30. [38]

    Yau A splitting theorem and an algebraic geometric characterization of locally Hermitian symmetric spaces , Comm

    S.T. Yau A splitting theorem and an algebraic geometric characterization of locally Hermitian symmetric spaces , Comm. Anal. Geom. 1 (1993), pp.473-486

    1993

  31. [39]

    Yano and M

    K. Yano and M. Kon Structures on Manifolds, Series in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 3, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, (1984)

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.