Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 31 references

Large-angle twisted photonic crystal semiconductor nanolasers with ultra-low thresholds operating in the C-band

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 5-degree twisted photonic crystal cavity lases at 1547 nm with a threshold near 1.25 kW/cm².

desk verdict Genuine first C-band lasing in a 5° twisted photonic crystal cavity with solid evidence, but the threshold numbers are internally inconsistent and the mode assignment is inferred, not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14772 v1 pith:OVU7AQOP submitted 2024-11-22 physics.optics

Yilan Wang , Feng Tian , Wendi Huang , Taojie Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords NanolaserTwistedstructurePhotoniccrystalC-bandLowthresholdInGaAsPmulti-quantumwellsModevolume
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a tiny cavity made by overlapping two photonic crystal patterns rotated by 5 degrees can lase at room temperature in the telecom C-band. The authors claim the device, a suspended InGaAsP multi-quantum-well membrane, emits a single mode at 1547 nm with a pump threshold near $1.25\,\text{kW/cm}^2$, a measured linewidth of 0.67 nm ($Q\sim 2300$), and a simulated mode volume of $0.47(\lambda/n)^3$. The significance is that the twisted geometry confines light without the careful hole-by-hole optimization of conventional defect cavities, while the twist angle can in principle be chosen freely. If the demonstration holds, it offers a simple route to compact, low-threshold, wavelength-tunable nanolasers for dense photonic integrated circuits.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the twisted photonic crystal nanocavity: a suspended membrane in which two sets of photonic crystal holes are superimposed and rotated by 5 degrees, truncated to five periods. The twist creates strong optical confinement in the central region without a defect hole, yielding a simulated $Q$ of about 3100 and a mode volume of $0.47(\lambda/n)^3$ for the fundamental mode. The paper uses three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain simulation to choose the structure, then verifies the cavity experimentally through power-dependent spectra, polarization measurements, linewidth analysis, time-resolved photoluminescence, and near-field imaging.

What would settle it

Measure the spatial field distribution and polarization of the 1547 nm mode above threshold: if it does not show the simulated central confinement and the 60-degree polarization relationship to the 1535 nm mode, the identification of lasing as the twisted-cavity fundamental mode would be called into question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a large-angle (5-degree) twisted photonic crystal nanocavity with $N=5$ periods, lattice constant $a=540$ nm and hole radius $r/a=0.26$ supports a doubly degenerate high-$Q$ fundamental mode at 1547 nm with simulated $Q\approx 3100$ and $V_m=0.47(\lambda/n)^3$. The authors present lasing evidence from an optically pumped InGaAsP multi-quantum-well membrane: a kink in the light-in/light-out curve at about $1.25\,\text{kW/cm}^2$, linewidth narrowing to 0.67 nm, a time-resolved photoluminescence lifetime drop from 4.19 ns to 0.2 ns, and coherent speckle in the near field above threshold. They also report single-mode emission below $2.5P_{\text{th}}$, with a higher-order mode at 1535 nm appearing at higher pump powers and eventually splitting into non-degenerate modes attributed to fabrication imperfections. Varying the lattice constant and hole radius shifts the lasing wavelength across roughly 85 nm in the 1550 nm band, and lasing persists from 10 K to 296 K. All of this is presented as a demonstration that arbitrary large twist angles can be used to construct robust, compact nanolasers.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the fabricated device faithfully realizing the simulated 5-degree twisted cavity, so that the 1547 nm lasing peak is the designed fundamental mode with the claimed mode volume.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, a fixed twisted-cavity design with $N=5$ can serve as a room-temperature nanolaser in the C-band with a footprint near $25\,\mu\text{m}^2$.
  • Arrays made by varying lattice constant and hole radius should provide single-mode emission across an 85 nm span in the 1550 nm telecom band from one fabrication run.
  • The 60-degree polarization difference between the fundamental and higher-order modes gives a sharp experimental signature of the twisted cavity's rotational symmetry.
  • The same device should operate from cryogenic to room temperature, with the threshold set mainly by how well the lasing peak sits inside the gain spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the paper argues that twist angle can be chosen arbitrarily, a natural extension the authors leave implicit is twist-angle tuning: building the same cavity at several small and large angles should shift the resonant wavelength independently of lattice constant and hole radius.
  • The reported 60-degree polarization splitting could be used in fabrication screening as a non-destructive check that the two hole patterns really are twisted by the intended angle rather than misaligned or distorted.
  • The threshold is quoted as a power density from a roughly 2-micron pump spot; converting that to absorbed power or testing different spot sizes would show whether the ultra-low threshold is an intrinsic cavity property or partly a pumping-geometry effect.
  • The mode volume is simulation-only; an experimental estimate, for instance from the gain needed to reach threshold or from nonlinear wavelength shifts, would test whether the twisted cavity truly confines light to $0.47(\lambda/n)^3$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports optically pumped InGaAsP multi-quantum-well nanolasers formed by a 5-degree twisted photonic-crystal nanocavity with lattice constant a = 540 nm, r/a = 0.26, and N = 5 periods. The authors claim single-mode room-temperature lasing in the C-band at approximately 1547 nm with a threshold of about 1.25 kW/cm2, a linewidth of 0.67 nm (Q ~ 2300), a simulated mode volume of 0.47 (lambda/n)^3, and an 80-85 nm wavelength tuning range across arrays with varied a and r. Lasing is supported by an L-L kink, linewidth narrowing, a carrier-lifetime drop from 4.19 ns to 0.2 ns, and speckled near-field emission. Temperature-dependent measurements from 10 K to 296 K are also presented.

Significance. If the claims hold, this would be a compact, room-temperature, C-band nanolaser with an ultra-small mode volume and low threshold, and the twisted-cavity approach would offer simple wavelength tuning by geometry. The paper has clear strengths: the lasing evidence is internally coherent (L-L kink, linewidth narrowing, lifetime shortening, speckle), the FDTD simulation is not fitted to the measured threshold, and the geometry-versus-wavelength trend is checked against measurement rather than used to infer the parameters. The main significance is therefore conditional on resolving the mode-assignment and threshold-consistency questions, which currently leave the headline numbers underdetermined.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Fig. 3a vs. Fig. 5b] The paper reports two different room-temperature thresholds for the same nominal structure (a = 540 nm, r/a = 0.26): approximately 1.25 kW/cm2 in Fig. 3a and approximately 3 kW/cm2 at 296 K in Fig. 5b. This factor-of-2.4 spread in the headline threshold is not discussed or explained. Because the ultra-low-threshold claim is central, the authors must either report the threshold extraction method and device-to-device statistics, or explain why the two figures use different criteria for the same structure.
  2. [§1 and §3, Fig. 1c-e vs. Fig. 2a and Fig. 3e-f] The measured 1547 nm peak is not independently shown to be the designed twisted-cavity fundamental mode with the simulated mode volume of 0.47 (lambda/n)^3. The near-field images in Fig. 3e-f show speckle above threshold but are not compared with the simulated field profile, no mode-resolved measurement of the spatial or polarization pattern is used to verify the assignment, and fabrication disorder is not quantified. A credible mode assignment requires either a spatial mode image matched to the simulated profile, a systematic study of how measured wavelengths track the simulated dispersion across several geometries with disorder estimates, or an independent measurement of the mode volume.
  3. [Abstract and §3, Fig. 2a-f] The paper claims "single-mode" operation while Fig. 2a shows a second peak at 1535 nm appearing at elevated pump powers and the text states that above 2.5Pth the degenerate modes split into two non-degenerate modes due to fabrication imperfections; Fig. 5a also shows multi-mode emission at high input powers. The single-mode claim should be qualified to a specific pump range (e.g., below 2.5Pth), and the abstract and conclusions should not imply single-mode operation in all displayed conditions.
  4. [Methods, Optical Measurement] The threshold extraction is not defined in the Methods: no criterion is given for locating Pth on the L-L curve, no error bars or number of measured devices are reported, and the L-L curve in Fig. 3a is presented without raw data points or a fit model. Since threshold is a headline quantity, the authors should specify the extraction procedure and provide device statistics or at least state how many nominally identical devices were measured.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] The caption of Fig. 1d is not defined in the figure caption; the subpanel labels in Fig. 1 are partly inconsistent with the text, which refers to panels c-d but the caption lists only c-d, and the description of the simulated field profiles in the text is not matched to a specific panel in the caption.
  2. [§3, Fig. 3b] The TRPL decay fit is called bi-exponential but only the values tau_spe = 4.19 ns and tau_lasing = 0.2 ns are given; the fast and slow component amplitudes and the excitation conditions for the two curves should be reported for reproducibility.
  3. [§4, Fig. 4b-c] The text reports a tunable range of approximately 85 nm while Fig. 4c is described as showing about 80 nm; the discrepancy should be harmonized and the specific wavelength range (e.g., 1500-1585 nm) should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Methods, Simulation] The FDTD simulation section does not give the grid resolution, boundary conditions, or the refractive-index model for the InGaAsP MQW membrane; these details are needed to assess the reliability of the reported Q and Vm values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular step is exhibited: the measured lasing quantities and the fixed-parameter FDTD simulation are independent, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The central quantities are either directly measured (threshold, linewidth, carrier lifetimes, lasing wavelengths) or obtained from a fixed-parameter FDTD simulation using stated structural parameters (a = 540 nm, r/a = 0.26, twist angle 5°, N = 5). The simulation is not fitted to the measured L-L curve, and no equation in the manuscript defines a measured quantity in terms of a fitted parameter. The geometry-versus-wavelength trend in Fig. 4 is compared with, rather than used to define, the measured lasing peaks, so no fitted input is being renamed as a prediction. The only self-citations (refs. 14 and 28, by author T. Zhou) are background/motivation citations and do not carry the lasing or mode-volume claims. The identification of the 1547 nm peak as the designed fundamental mode is an empirical assignment supported by the 60-degree polarization splitting and near-field images, not a definitional reduction; even if that assignment were incorrect, the error would be a measurement/interpretation issue, not circularity. The internal disagreement between the ~1.25 kW/cm2 threshold in Fig. 3a and the ~3 kW/cm2 room-temperature threshold in Fig. 5b is a consistency concern for the ultra-low-threshold claim, but it is not a circularity and does not fall under any of the enumerated circularity patterns. Since no specific reduction of a predicted quantity to its own input can be quoted, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central lasing claim rests on the assumptions that the simulations describe the passive structure, that the measured lasing signatures correspond to the designed mode, and that fabrication disorder does not change the mode identity. No new physical entities are introduced. The structural parameters a, r/a, twist angle, and N are design inputs, not free parameters fitted to the lasing threshold, so the ledger contains no fitted constants.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The FDTD simulation of Maxwell's equations with the stated refractive indices accurately predicts the passive cavity Q and mode volume.
    Invoked in the Methods Simulation section; the central mode volume and theoretical Q values come from this simulation, and the paper does not provide an independent experimental measure of mode volume.
  • domain assumption The observed L-L kink, linewidth narrowing, TRPL lifetime drop, and near-field speckle are sufficient to identify the transition to lasing.
    Invoked in Fig.3a, Fig.3b, and Fig.3e-f; these are standard lasing criteria but their interpretation depends on the assumption that the measured signal comes from the designed cavity mode and not from a parasitic background.
  • domain assumption The fabricated suspended InGaAsP membrane accurately matches the simulated twisted photonic crystal geometry, including the 5 degree twist, N = 5 periods, r/a = 0.26, and lattice constant.
    Invoked by comparing Fig.1e simulation with Fig.2a measured spectra; fabrication disorder or twisting errors could shift the mode or change its identity, and the paper does not quantify this uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The emission near 1547 nm originates from the designed high-Q fundamental mode rather than from an unintended edge mode or defect mode.
    Invoked in the Results section around Fig.2a and Fig.3a; the paper identifies the peak by wavelength and polarization but does not directly image or spectrally resolve the mode profile to prove the assignment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large-angle twisted photonic crystal semiconductor nanolasers with ultra-low thresholds operating in the C-band." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OVU7AQOP

@misc{pith2026241114772,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large-angle twisted photonic crystal semiconductor nanolasers with ultra-low thresholds operating in the C-band},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OVU7AQOP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14772}
}
abstract

Nanolasers, characterized by enhanced optical localization at subwavelength scale, have emerged as promising coherent light sources for ultra-compact, high-speed and energy-efficient photonic integrated circuits. Twisted photonic crystal nanocavity, constructed by stacking two layers of photonic crystal structure with a specified rotation angle, enables strong light confinement with an ultra-small mode volume and an extremely high quality factor. The twisted angle can be randomly selected, providing the possibility of actively tuning the resonant wavelength and optical mode distribution within a nanoscale twisted cavity. Here, we demonstrate large-angle twisted single-mode photonic crystal nanolasers operating in the C-band with an exceptionally ultra-compact footprint of approximately 25 $\mu m^2$ and an ultra-small mode volume of 0.47 $(\lambda/n)^3$. The reported twisted photonic crystal nanolasers are optically pumped at room temperature with an ultra-low threshold of $\sim$ 1.25 $kW/cm^2$. Our work provides a prospective method for easily constructing robust nanolasers by twisting angles, and paves the way for achieving high-performance nanoscale coherent light sources for densely integrated photonic chips.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14772 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of a twisted PhC nanolaser. (b) Top-view SEM image of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Measured power-dependent spectra of a twisted PhC nanolaser with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Collected L-L curve and linewidth of the lasing peak at 1547 nm, indicating a lasing threshold of ∼ 1.25 kW/cm2 . The inset shows curve fitting (red line) of measured data (open circles) just below the threshold. (b) Collected normalized TRPL spectra of spontaneous emission (orange curve) and stimulated emission (blue curve). The red curves are fits to a bi-exponential decay model. Measured lasing wavelengths (c… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Top view SEM image of an array of ultra-compact twisted PhC nanolasers. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Temperature-dependent lasing spectra measured from 10 to 296 K for a large [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H.; Schneider, R

    Nagarajan, R.; Joyner, C. H.; Schneider, R. P.; Bostak, J. S.; Butrie, T.; Dentai, A. G.; Dominic, V. G.; Evans, P. W.; Kato, M.; Kauffman, M.; others. Large-scale photonic integrated circuits. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2005, 11, 50–65. 12

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Y.; Santis, C

    Komljenovic, T.; Davenport, M.; Hulme, J.; Liu, A. Y.; Santis, C. T.; Spott, A.; Srini- vasan, S.; Stanton, E. J.; Zhang, C.; Bowers, J. E. Heterogeneous silicon photonic inte- grated circuits. Journal of Lightwave Technology 2015, 34, 20–35

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    K.; Duan, G

    Dong, P.; Chen, Y. K.; Duan, G. H.; Neilson, D. T. Silicon photonic devices and inte- grated circuits. Nanophotonics 2014, 3, 215–228

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Zhou, Z.; Ou, X.; Fang, Y.; Alkhazraji, E.; Xu, R.; Wan, Y.; Bowers, J. E. Prospects and applications of on-chip lasers.Elight 2023, 3, 1

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    On-chip light sources for silicon photonics.Light: Science & Applications 2015, 4, e358–e358

    Zhou, Z.; Yin, B.; Michel, J. On-chip light sources for silicon photonics.Light: Science & Applications 2015, 4, e358–e358

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    D.; Ng, K

    Chen, R.; Tran, T.-T. D.; Ng, K. W.; Ko, W. S.; Chuang, L. C.; Sedgwick, F. G.; Chang-Hasnain, C. Nanolasers grown on silicon.Nature Photonics 2011, 5, 170–175

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    H.; Yun, S

    Sarkar, D.; Cho, S.; Yan, H.; Martino, N.; Dannenberg, P. H.; Yun, S. H. Ultrasmall InGa (As) P dielectric and plasmonic nanolasers.ACS nano 2023, 17, 16048–16055

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    S.; Jiang, S.; Pan, S

    Deka, S. S.; Jiang, S.; Pan, S. H.; Fainman, Y. Nanolaser arrays: toward application- driven dense integration.Nanophotonics 2020, 10, 149–169

    work page 2020

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    M.; Oulton, R

    Ma, R. M.; Oulton, R. F. Applications of nanolasers.Nature Nanotechnology 2019, 14, 12–22

    2019

  2. [10]

    Ning, C. Z. Semiconductor nanolasers and the size-energy-efficiency challenge: a review. Advanced Photonics 2019, 1, 014002–014002

    2019

  3. [11]

    H.; Nozaki, K.; Sato, T.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Taniyama, H.; Notomi, M

    Matsuo, S.; Shinya, A.; Chen, C. H.; Nozaki, K.; Sato, T.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Taniyama, H.; Notomi, M. 20-Gbit/s directly modulated photonic crystal nanocavity laser with ultra- low power consumption.Optics Express 2011, 19, 2242–2250. 13

    2011

  4. [12]

    Few-fJ/bit data transmissions using directly mod- ulated lambda-scale embedded active region photonic-crystal lasers.Nature Photonics 2013, 7, 569–575

    Takeda, K.; Sato, T.; Shinya, A.; Nozaki, K.; Kobayashi, W.; Taniyama, H.; Notomi, M.; Hasebe, K.; Kakitsuka, T.; Matsuo, S. Few-fJ/bit data transmissions using directly mod- ulated lambda-scale embedded active region photonic-crystal lasers.Nature Photonics 2013, 7, 569–575

    2013

  5. [13]

    Z.; Zhang, Q

    Liang, Y.; Li, C.; Huang, Y. Z.; Zhang, Q. Plasmonic nanolasers in on-chip light sources: prospects and challenges.ACS nano 2020, 14, 14375–14390

    2020

  6. [14]

    Zhou, T.; Tang, M.; Xiang, G.; Xiang, B.; Hark, S.; Martin, M.; Baron, T.; Pan, S.; Park,J.-S.; Liu,Z.; Chen,S.; Zhaoyu,Z.; Liu,H.Continuous-wavequantumdotphotonic crystal lasers grown on on-axis Si (001).Nature Communications 2020, 11, 977

    2020

  7. [15]

    H.; Jeong, J.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y

    He, F.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, Z.; Cho, S. H.; Jeong, J.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y. Moiré patterns in 2D materials: a review.ACS nano 2021, 15, 5944–5958

    2021

  8. [16]

    F.; Dean, C

    Yankowitz, M.; Chen, S.; Polshyn, H.; Zhang, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Graf, D.; Young, A. F.; Dean, C. R. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene.Science 2019, 363, 1059–1064

    2019

  9. [17]

    A.; Stepanov, P.; Duran, J

    Lisi, S.; Lu, X.; Benschop, T.; de Jong, T. A.; Stepanov, P.; Duran, J. R.; Margot, F.; Cucchi, I.; Cappelli, E.; Hunter, A.; Tamai, A.; Kandyba, V.; Giampietri, A.; Bari- nov, A.; Jobst, J.; Stalman, V.; Leeuwenhoek, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Rade- maker, L. et al. Obs...

    2021

  10. [18]

    R.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wang, F.; Sun, Z

    Du, L.; Molas, M. R.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wang, F.; Sun, Z. Moiré photonics and optoelectronics. Science 2023, 379, eadg0014

    2023

  11. [19]

    Y.; Yoo, H.; Sternbach, A.; McLeod, A.; Stauber, T.; Xiong, L.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Kim, P.; Fogler, M.; Basov, D

    Sunku, S.; Ni, G.; Jiang, B. Y.; Yoo, H.; Sternbach, A.; McLeod, A.; Stauber, T.; Xiong, L.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Kim, P.; Fogler, M.; Basov, D. Photonic crystals for nano-light in moiré graphene superlattices.Science 2018, 362, 1153–1156. 14

    2018

  12. [20]

    H.; Hardison, A

    Talukdar, T. H.; Hardison, A. L.; Ryckman, J. D. Moiré effects in silicon photonic nanowires. ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 1286–1294

    2022

  13. [21]

    Photonic flat-band lattices and unconventional light localization.Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 1161–1176

    Tang,L.; Song,D.; Xia,S.; Xia,S.; Ma,J.; Yan,W.; Hu,Y.; Xu,J.; Leykam,D.; Chen,Z. Photonic flat-band lattices and unconventional light localization.Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 1161–1176

    2020

  14. [22]

    R.; Shao, Z

    Mao, X. R.; Shao, Z. K.; Luan, H. Y.; Wang, S. L.; Ma, R. M. Magic-angle lasers in nanostructured moiré superlattice.Nature Nanotechnology 2021, 16, 1099–1105

    2021

  15. [23]

    Y.; Ouyang, Y

    Luan, H. Y.; Ouyang, Y. H.; Zhao, Z. W.; Mao, W. Z.; Ma, R. M. Reconfigurable moiré nanolaser arrays with phase synchronization.Nature 2023, 624, 282–288

    2023

  16. [24]

    Raun, A.; Tang, H.; Ni, X.; Mazur, E.; Hu, E. L. GaN magic angle laser in a merged moiré photonic crystal.ACS Photonics 2023, 10, 3001–3007

    2023

  17. [25]

    M.; Luan, H

    Ma, R. M.; Luan, H. Y.; Zhao, Z. W.; Mao, W. Z.; Wang, S. L.; Ouyang, Y. H.; Shao, Z. K. Twisted lattice nanocavity with theoretical quality factor exceeding 200 billion. Fundamental Research 2023, 3, 537–543

    2023

  18. [26]

    H.; Luan, H

    Ouyang, Y. H.; Luan, H. Y.; Zhao, Z. W.; Mao, W. Z.; Ma, R. M. Singular dielectric nanolaser with atomic-scale field localization.Nature 2024, 632, 287–293

    2024

  19. [27]

    S.; Noda, S

    Akahane, Y.; Asano, T.; Song, B. S.; Noda, S. High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two- dimensional photonic crystal.Nature 2003, 425, 944–947

    2003

  20. [28]

    S.; Martin, M.; Baron, T.; Chen, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z

    Zhou, T.; Tang, M.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Cui, Y.; Park, J. S.; Martin, M.; Baron, T.; Chen, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z. Single-mode photonic crystal nanobeam lasers monolithi- cally grown on Si for dense integration.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2021, 28, 1–6

    2021

  21. [29]

    S.; Asano, T.; Jeon, S.; Kim, H.; Chen, C.; Kang, D

    Song, B. S.; Asano, T.; Jeon, S.; Kim, H.; Chen, C.; Kang, D. D.; Noda, S. Ultrahigh-Q photonic crystal nanocavities based on 4H silicon carbide.Optica 2019, 6, 991–995. 15

    2019

  22. [30]

    T.; Pan, Z.; Valuckas, V.; Paniagua-Domínguez, R.; Demir, H

    Mylnikov, V.; Ha, S. T.; Pan, Z.; Valuckas, V.; Paniagua-Domínguez, R.; Demir, H. V.; Kuznetsov, A. I. Lasing action in single subwavelength particles supporting supercavity modes. ACS nano 2020, 14, 7338–7346

    2020

  23. [31]

    High-efficiency quantum dot lasers as comb sources for DWDM applications.Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 1836

    Dumont, M.; Liu, S.; Kennedy, M.; Bowers, J. High-efficiency quantum dot lasers as comb sources for DWDM applications.Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 1836. 16

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.