Local Well-posedness of the Free-boundary Problem in Incompressible Elastodynamics with Surface Tension

Longhui Xu

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Local Well-posedness of the Free-boundary Problem in Incompressible Elastodynamics with Surface Tension

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims local well-posedness for 3D free-boundary incompressible elastodynamics with surface tension, proven through an artificial-viscosity approximation with uniform energy estimates and no loss of regularity.

desk verdict Promised κ→0 limit is absent: an incomplete proof of a known theorem, but the κ-viscosity machinery is real and deserves referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14840 v2 pith:BQ6HBP4N submitted 2024-11-22 math.AP

Longhui Xu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q3535R3576B4574B20

keywords free-boundaryelastodynamicssurfacetensionlocalwell-posednessartificialviscosityneo-Hookeanelasticitygraphicalcoordinatesdiv-curlestimatesgoodunknownvariables

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the 3D free-boundary incompressible elastodynamics equations with surface tension on a periodic domain are locally well-posed. Concretely, Theorem 1.1 asserts that for compatible initial data with four square-integrable derivatives in the interior and five and a half derivatives of the boundary graph, a unique solution exists for a short time and its energy is bounded by a polynomial of the initial energy. The obstacle is that surface tension places the highest-order boundary terms at the top of the energy, so naive linearization loses boundary regularity. The proposed cure is to add artificial viscosity terms to the pressure boundary condition, prove energy estimates that are uniform in the viscosity parameter $\kappa$, and recover the original system as $\kappa \to 0$. The energy estimate closes without loss of regularity.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the $\kappa$-approximate pressure boundary condition (2.1): $q = -\sigma \nabla \cdot (\nabla \psi / \sqrt{1+|\nabla \psi|^2}) + \kappa(1-\Delta)^2 \psi + \kappa(1-\Delta)\partial_t \psi$ on $\Sigma$. The added $\kappa$-terms give the boundary graph two extra derivatives and a time-integrated control of $\partial_t \psi$, which is precisely the boundary regularity needed to close the high-order energy. Around this condition the proof builds a div-curl elliptic estimate (Lemma 2.3) to convert normal derivatives into tangential derivatives and curl, good-unknown variables (differentiated unknowns with the highest-order graph contribution subtracted) to keep commutators at lower order, and cancellation structures for the pure-time-derivative estimates. Together these produce uniform-in-$\kappa$ bounds of the form $E_4^\kappa(t) \le C(\sigma^{-1})P(E_4^\kappa(0))$.

What would settle it

Read the manuscript after Proposition 2.1: the announced recovery as $\kappa \to 0$ is not given. A concrete check is whether the uniform-in-$\kappa$ bounds imply strong convergence of a subsequence $(v^\kappa, F^\kappa, \psi^\kappa)$ in the spaces where the nonlinear terms are continuous; for instance, whether the available estimates control $\partial_t \psi^\kappa$ well enough to apply a standard compactness argument. If one can exhibit a uniformly bounded family of $\kappa$-approximate solutions with no strongly convergent subsequence, the claimed recovery fails; if the compactness estimate is present, the theorem is complete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

System (1.14) is the graphical-coordinate form of the free-boundary problem in a periodic slab $\Omega = \mathbb{T}^2 \times (-b,0)$: velocity $v$, pressure $q$, deformation tensor $F_k$, and boundary graph $\psi$ move under the incompressible neo-Hookean elastodynamics equations, with boundary conditions $\partial_t \psi = v \cdot N$, $q = -\sigma$ times the mean curvature of $\Sigma$, and $F_j \cdot N = 0$. Theorem 1.1 states that for fixed $\sigma > 0$, data $(q_0,v_0,F^0_k) \in H^4(\Omega)$ and $\psi_0 \in H^{5.5}(\Sigma)$ satisfying the compatibility condition up to third order, $E(0) \le M$, and the initial constraints (1.16)-(1.17), there is $T > 0$ such that (1.14) has a unique solution $(v,F_k,\psi)$ satisfying $\sup_{0 \le t \le T} E(t) \le C(\sigma^{-1})P(E(0))$, where $E(t)$ sums the squared $H^{4-l}$ norms of $\partial_t^l (v,F_k)$ and the squared $H^{5-l}$ boundary norms of $\sqrt{\sigma}\, \partial_t^l \psi$. The proof replaces the pressure boundary condition by the $\kappa$-approximation (2.1), establishes uniform-in-$\kappa$ energy estimates of order four, and then proves well-posedness of the $\kappa$-approximate system by linearization, finite-dimensional projection, and successive approximation; the text states that the original system is recovered by letting $\kappa \to 0$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the family of solutions to the $\kappa$-approximate system, whose well-posedness is proved for each fixed $\kappa > 0$, can actually be passed to the limit $\kappa \to 0$ to obtain a solution of the original system using the uniform estimates of Section 2; this limiting step is announced but never carried out in the text.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The theorem gives local existence and uniqueness for the 3D free-boundary problem with surface tension at the stated regularity, with a lifespan depending only on the initial energy and $\sigma$.
The energy estimate closes with no loss of regularity, so the derivative order used in the a priori estimate is sufficient for the existence argument.
The initial constraints $\mathrm{div}\, F_j = 0$ and $F_j \cdot N = 0$ propagate in time, so the formulation is consistent rather than overdetermined.
Because the estimates are uniform in $\kappa$, the approximate solutions form a bounded family that is the declared input for recovering the original system in the limit $\kappa \to 0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The $\kappa \to 0$ limiting step is announced twice (after Proposition 2.1 and at the start of Section 3) but is not executed in the manuscript: the construction in Section 3 proves well-posedness for each fixed $\kappa$ and stops after successive-approximation convergence in Section 3.4.
Completing Theorem 1.1 therefore requires a compactness argument that extracts a strongly convergent subsequence of $(v^\kappa, F^\kappa, \psi^\kappa)$ as $\kappa \to 0$ from the uniform bounds; without such an argument the recovery of (1.14) remains open.
If the limit step is closed, the artificial-viscosity scheme is a plausible template for other free-boundary hyperbolic problems with surface-tension-induced boundary regularity loss, such as compressible elastodynamics or magnetohydrodynamic free-boundary problems.
The paper's choice to allow constants to depend on $\sigma^{-1}$, rather than aiming at $\sigma$-uniform estimates, simplifies several commutator estimates and may make the scheme easier to adapt than earlier approaches.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague, the thing to know about arXiv:2411.14840 is that the κ→0 limit is never carried out. The paper proves fixed-κ well-posedness of an artificial-viscosity regularized system and uniform-in-κ a priori estimates, then stops. There is no subsequence extraction, no verification that the κ-terms in the boundary condition (2.1) vanish, and no identification of the limit with the original system (1.14). Theorem 1.1 is not proved in this text.

That said, this is not a careless paper. The κ-viscosity scheme is a genuine adaptation of Zhang's MHD current-vortex sheet idea [34]: modifying only the balanced pressure boundary condition by κ(1−Δ)^2ψ + κ(1−Δ)∂tψ, chosen precisely so that the constraint F·N=0 still propagates. The uniform energy estimates in Section 2 are intricate, especially the full-time-derivative case, and the cancellations via Alinhac's good unknown look plausible. The fixed-κ well-posedness via Galerkin and Picard iteration is mostly carried out. The technical core is substantial and likely sound.

The soft spots are proportionate. The missing limit is load-bearing: fixed-κ results come with constants C(κ^{-1},K0) and κ-dependent lifespans, so one cannot just say "by the uniform estimates" and pass. A compactness argument on a common time interval and a check that the κ-boundary terms go to zero are essential. Second, the paper defers the AGU reformulation and key commutator estimates to the author's own unpublished preprint [32], which creates a real circularity burden. The theorem itself is not new—Gu–Lei [12] already proved local well-posedness with surface tension—so the only contribution is the proof scheme. That can be legitimate, but the proof must be complete and self-contained enough to verify.

Bottom line: this is a serious technical paper in an incomplete state. I would send it to a referee familiar with vanishing-viscosity methods, because the gap is concrete and possibly fixable, and the machinery deserves scrutiny. I would not accept it as is. Worth one reading-group discussion, mostly to debate whether the missing limit is routine or hides real trouble.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims local well-posedness of the 3D free-boundary incompressible elastodynamics system with surface tension in a periodic graph domain. The strategy is to introduce an artificial-viscosity approximate system indexed by kappa>0, prove kappa-uniform a priori estimates for that system (Section 2), prove well-posedness of the approximate system for each fixed kappa by Picard iteration (Section 3), and then recover a solution of the original system by taking kappa to 0. The main result is Theorem 1.1, which states existence, uniqueness, and an energy estimate for the free-boundary problem (1.14). The proof as written ends at the fixed-kappa well-posedness step; the promised kappa-to-0 limiting argument is never carried out.

Significance. If completed, the result would be a useful contribution to the free-boundary elastodynamics literature: it proposes an artificial-viscosity boundary regularization that preserves the propagation of the constraint F_j·N=0, avoids tangential smoothing, and yields energy estimates without regularity loss. The L2 conservation law in Proposition 2.2 and the cancellation structure for full time derivatives in Section 2.3.3 are valuable and clearly presented. The fixed-kappa Picard iteration in Section 3 is also a substantial piece of work. However, because the passage from the kappa-approximate system to the original system is absent, the central theorem is not established. The significance is therefore conditional on completing that limiting argument and on making the deferred AGU derivations verifiable.

major comments (3)

[Theorem 1.1; Sections 2 and 3] The proof of Theorem 1.1 is incomplete: the text states after (2.2) that one can recover a solution to the original system by taking kappa to 0, and the introduction to Section 3 repeats this claim, but no such limiting argument appears. Proposition 3.1 gives a lifespan T_kappa depending on kappa and constants C(kappa^{-1}, K_0), so the family of approximate solutions is not shown to exist on a common time interval. Proposition 2.1 is a conditional a priori estimate for smooth solutions of the approximate system. The manuscript never extracts a convergent subsequence as kappa_j -> 0, never shows that the artificial-viscosity terms kappa(1-Delta)^2 psi and kappa(1-Delta) partial_t psi in (2.1) vanish in the limit, never identifies the limit as a solution of (1.14), and never derives the energy bound (1.18). Thus the main theorem is not proved.
[Section 3.2 and Proposition 3.1] The Galerkin argument in Section 3.2 establishes only an L2 weak solution of the linearized system, with the uniform-in-m estimate (3.24) being an L2 energy. Proposition 3.1, however, asserts the higher-order estimate E_4^kappa, which requires differentiating the equations and controlling boundary terms at higher regularity. No regularization, density, or other argument is supplied to show that these formal higher-order estimates apply to the weak limit obtained from the Galerkin sequence. The sentence in Section 3.2 referring to [25] for the assertion that the weak solution is actually strong is not accompanied by any verification of the hypotheses of that result. Consequently, the fixed-kappa well-posedness of the approximate system (2.2), which is needed before any limit kappa -> 0 can be taken, is not fully established.
[Section 2.3.1 and equations (2.23)-(2.33)] The Alinhac good-unknown reformulation is central to the kappa-uniform a priori estimates, but its derivation is deferred to the author's own unpublished preprint [32]. The manuscript states 'We refer to [32] for the detailed derivation' and then uses the reformulated system (2.30) as the basis for all subsequent energy estimates. Since the reader cannot independently verify these identities from the present text, and since the rest of Section 2 depends on them, the proof is not self-contained. The paper should either include the derivation as a lemma or give enough detail to make the identities checkable without recourse to an unpublished source.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and Section 1] The abstract contains a typo: 'in compressible elastodynamics' should be 'incompressible elastodynamics'; similarly, 'neo-Hooken elsatic' in the introduction should be 'neo-Hookean elastic'.
[Equation (2.3)] The definition of the energy E_kappa^4(t) contains an ambiguous expression and a typo: the term '|sqrt(sigma) partial_t^l psi|_{5-l}, |sqrt(kappa) partial_t^l psi|_{6-l} + integral_0^t |sqrt(kappa) partial_t^{l+1} psi|_{5-k}' appears to be a sum, and the index k in the last norm should presumably be l.
[Remark 3.2] The sentence 'The initial constraint nabla^{phi^n} . F^n_k and F^n_k . N^n = may not propagate' has a dangling equals sign and should be completed.
[Section 3.2] The phrase 'weakly converges subject to a subsequence' should be 'weakly converges along a subsequence' or equivalent.
[Section 3.3] The sentence 'where the last two terms can by directly controlled by C(K_0) E_kappa^4(t)' is missing the word 'be'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central estimates are derived in the text; the main gap is the missing κ→0 limit, which is an omitted argument, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is not circular in the sense of the rubric. The core energy estimates in Proposition 2.1 are proved in Sections 2.1–2.3 from the κ-approximate system (2.2); the passage to the original system is stated as 'we can recover a solution to the original system (1.14) by taking the limit κ → 0+' (§2) and the paper ends §3.4 with a fixed-κ limit: 'We can recover the solution ... to our approximate system (2.2) by remark 3.3.' No subsequence extraction as κ_j→0, no uniform common lifespan, and no verification that the κ-terms in (2.1) vanish in the limit are supplied. This is an omitted limiting argument, i.e., a correctness/completeness gap, not a reduction of the conclusion to its assumptions. The self-citations to [32] for the AGU identities and transport theorems are also not circularly load-bearing: the relevant formulas ((2.23)–(2.27), (2.30)) are displayed in the text, and [32] is used for algebraic derivations rather than as the source of Theorem 1.1. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no uniqueness theorem imported from the author's prior work. Accordingly the circularity score is 0, with the caveat that the proof of Theorem 1.1 is incomplete as written.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof depends on the artificial viscosity parameter kappa, the author's own prior a priori estimate in [32], standard elliptic and Galerkin machinery, and the unproved recovery of the original system as kappa tends to zero. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

kappa = kappa > 0, taken to 0
Artificial viscosity added to the pressure boundary condition (2.1) to boost boundary regularity of psi; the proof requires estimates uniform in kappa and a limit kappa -> 0 that is not demonstrated.

assumptions (6)

standard math The Hodge-type elliptic estimate (Lemma 2.3) from [11]
Used in Sections 2.2 and 3.3.1 to replace normal derivatives by tangential derivatives and curls.
domain assumption The a priori energy estimates and AGU commutator identities from the author's prior preprint [32]
Sections 2 and 2.3.1 refer to [32] for 'the detailed derivation' and for the prior a priori estimate; this unpublished self-cited work is not included in the submission.
standard math The Galerkin method and the result in [25] that the weak solution is a strong solution
Used in Section 3.2 to construct the linearized solution; the argument is summarized but not fully self-contained.
domain assumption The graphical-coordinate setup with cutoff chi satisfying (1.6) and |psi0|_infinity < b/3 ensures Phi is a diffeomorphism
Used throughout to flatten the free boundary; the assumption avoids bottom touch and keeps partial_3 phi bounded below.
ad hoc to paper The artificial viscosity approximation (2.1) recovers the original system as kappa -> 0
This is the paper's central device; it is introduced without proof and the limit is never carried out.
domain assumption The initial constraints (1.16)-(1.17) and compatibility conditions (1.15) propagate in the lifespan
Remark 1.1 and Section 3.1 rely on propagation of the constraints to close the estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local Well-posedness of the Free-boundary Problem in Incompressible Elastodynamics with Surface Tension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQ6HBP4N

@misc{pith2026241114840,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local Well-posedness of the Free-boundary Problem in Incompressible Elastodynamics with Surface Tension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQ6HBP4N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14840}
}

abstract

We prove the local well-posedness of the 3D free-boundary incompressible elastodynamics with surface tension describing the motion of an elastic medium in a periodic domain with a moving graphical surface. The deformation tensor is assumed to satisfy the neo-Hookean linear elasticity. We adapt the idea in arXiv:2312.11254 to generate an approximate problem with artificial viscosity indexed by $\kappa > 0$ to boost the boundary regularity, which recovers the original system as $\kappa\to 0$, and the energy estimates yield no regularity loss.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[34]

Well-posedness and incompressible limit of curren t-vortex sheets with surface tension in compressible ideal mhd

Junyan Zhang. Well-posedness and incompressible limit of curren t-vortex sheets with surface tension in compressible ideal mhd. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11254 , 2024

arXiv 2024
[32]

On the free-boundary incompressible elastodyna mics with and without surface tension, 2024

Longhui Xu. On the free-boundary incompressible elastodyna mics with and without surface tension, 2024

work page 2024
[12]

Local Well-posedness of the Free Boundary Incompressible Elastodynamics with Surface Tension

Xumin Gu and Zhen Lei. Local well-posedness of the free bounda ry incompressible elastodynamics with surface tension. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.13354 , 2020

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[25]

Small viscosity and boundary layer methods: theory, stabil ity analysis, and applications

Guy M´ etivier. Small viscosity and boundary layer methods: theory, stabil ity analysis, and applications . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

work page 2012
[1]

On the cauchy pro blem for gravity water waves

Thomas Alazard, Nicolas Burq, and Claude Zuily. On the cauchy pro blem for gravity water waves. Inventiones mathematicae, 198(1):71–163, 2014

work page 2014
[2]

Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in two-dimensional elastodynamics

Robin Ming Chen, Jilong Hu, and Dehua Wang. Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in two-dimensional elastodynamics. Advances in Mathematics , 311:18–60, 2017

work page 2017
[3]

Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics: variable coeﬃcients

Robin Ming Chen, Jilong Hu, and Dehua Wang. Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics: variable coeﬃcients. Mathematische Annalen , 376:863–912, 2020

work page 2020
[4]

Nonlinear stability and exis- tence of compressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics

Robin Ming Chen, Jilong Hu, Dehua Wang, Tao Wang, and Difan Yuan. Nonlinear stability and exis- tence of compressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations , 269(9):6899– 6940, 2020

work page 2020

Show all 35 references

[5]

Stabiliz ation eﬀect of elasticity on three-dimensional compressible vortex sheets

Robin Ming Chen, Feimin Huang, Dehua Wang, and Difan Yuan. Stabiliz ation eﬀect of elasticity on three-dimensional compressible vortex sheets. Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 172:105– 138, 2023

2023
[6]

On the motion of the f ree surface of a liquid

Demetrios Christodoulou and Hans Lindblad. On the motion of the f ree surface of a liquid. Communi- cations on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 53(12):1536–1602, 2000

2000
[7]

The interaction between qua silinear elastodynamics and the navier- stokes equations

Daniel Coutand and Steve Shkoller. The interaction between qua silinear elastodynamics and the navier- stokes equations. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 179:303–352, 2006

2006
[8]

Well-posedness of the free- surface incompressible euler equations with or without surface tension

Daniel Coutand and Steve Shkoller. Well-posedness of the free- surface incompressible euler equations with or without surface tension. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 20(3):829–930, 2007

2007
[9]

A simple proof of well-posedne ss for the free-surface incompressible euler equations

Daniel Coutand and Steve Shkoller. A simple proof of well-posedne ss for the free-surface incompressible euler equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S , 3(3):429–449, 2010

2010
[10]

Hyperbolic conservation laws in continuum physics, volume 3

Constantine M Dafermos and Constantine M Dafermos. Hyperbolic conservation laws in continuum physics, volume 3. Springer, 2005

2005
[11]

Local well-po sedness for the motion of a compress- ible, self-gravitating liquid with free surface boundary

Daniel Ginsberg, Hans Lindblad, and Chenyun Luo. Local well-po sedness for the motion of a compress- ible, self-gravitating liquid with free surface boundary. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 236:603–733, 2020

2020
[13]

Well-posedness of the free boundary pr oblem in incompressible elastody- namics under the mixed type stability condition

Xumin Gu and Fan Wang. Well-posedness of the free boundary pr oblem in incompressible elastody- namics under the mixed type stability condition. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 482(1):123529, 2020

2020
[14]

Well-posedness of the free bo undary problem for incompressible elastodynamics

Xianpeng Hu and Yongting Huang. Well-posedness of the free bo undary problem for incompressible elastodynamics. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations , 266(12):7844–7889, 2019

2019
[15]

Global solutions for incompress ible viscoelastic ﬂuids

Zhen Lei, Chun Liu, and Yi Zhou. Global solutions for incompress ible viscoelastic ﬂuids. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 188:371–398, 2008

2008
[16]

Global existence of classical solutions fo r the two-dimensional oldroyd model via the incompressible limit

Zhen Lei and Yi Zhou. Global existence of classical solutions fo r the two-dimensional oldroyd model via the incompressible limit. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis , 37(3):797–814, 2005

2005
[17]

Well-posedness of the free boundary problem in incompressible elastodynamics

Hui Li, Wei Wang, and Zhifei Zhang. Well-posedness of the free boundary problem in incompressible elastodynamics. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations , 267(11):6604–6643, 2019

2019
[18]

Well-posedness of the free boundary problem in elastodynamics with mixed stability condition

Hui Li, Wei Wang, and Zhifei Zhang. Well-posedness of the free boundary problem in elastodynamics with mixed stability condition. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 53(5):5405–5435, 2021. 29

2021
[19]

On hydrodynamics of vis coelastic ﬂuids

Fang-Hua Lin, Chun Liu, and Ping Zhang. On hydrodynamics of vis coelastic ﬂuids. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 58(11):1437–1471, 2005

2005
[20]

Some analytical issues for elastic complex ﬂuids

Fanghua Lin. Some analytical issues for elastic complex ﬂuids. Comm. Pure Appl. Math , 65(7):893–919, 2012

2012
[21]

On the initial-boundary value problem of the incompressible viscoelastic ﬂuid system

Fanghua Lin and Ping Zhang. On the initial-boundary value problem of the incompressible viscoelastic ﬂuid system. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal I ssued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences , 61(4):539–558, 2008

2008
[22]

Well-posedness for the linearized motion of an inco mpressible liquid with free surface boundary

Hans Lindblad. Well-posedness for the linearized motion of an inco mpressible liquid with free surface boundary. arXiv preprint math/0112030 , 2001

2001 arXiv
[23]

Well-posedness for the motion of an incompressib le liquid with free surface boundary

Hans Lindblad. Well-posedness for the motion of an incompressib le liquid with free surface boundary. Annals of mathematics , pages 109–194, 2005

2005
[24]

Compressible gravity-capillary water waves with vorticity: Local well-posedness, incompressible and zero-surface-tension limits

Chenyun Luo and Junyan Zhang. Compressible gravity-capillary water waves with vorticity: Local well-posedness, incompressible and zero-surface-tension limits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03600 , 2022

2022 arXiv
[26]

On the three-dimensional euler equations with a free boundary subject to surface tension

Ben Schweizer. On the three-dimensional euler equations with a free boundary subject to surface tension. In Annales de l’IHP Analyse non lin´ eaire, volume 22, pages 753–781, 2005

2005
[27]

Geometry and a priori estim ates for free boundary problems of the euler’s equation

Jalal Shatah and Chongchun Zeng. Geometry and a priori estim ates for free boundary problems of the euler’s equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal I ssued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences , 61(5):698–744, 2008

2008
[28]

A priori estimates for ﬂuid in terface problems

Jalal Shatah and Chongchun Zeng. A priori estimates for ﬂuid in terface problems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Couran t Institute of Mathematical Sciences , 61(6):848–876, 2008

2008
[29]

Local well-posedness for ﬂ uid interface problems

Jalal Shatah and Chongchun Zeng. Local well-posedness for ﬂ uid interface problems. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 199(2):653–705, 2011

2011
[30]

Well-posedness in sobolev spaces of the full water wav e problem in 2-d

Sijue Wu. Well-posedness in sobolev spaces of the full water wav e problem in 2-d. Inventiones mathe- maticae, 130(1):39–72, 1997

1997
[31]

Well-posedness in sobolev spaces of the full water wav e problem in 3-d

Sijue Wu. Well-posedness in sobolev spaces of the full water wav e problem in 3-d. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 12(2):445–495, 1999

1999
[33]

Local well-posedness and incompressible limit of t he free-boundary problem in com- pressible elastodynamics

Junyan Zhang. Local well-posedness and incompressible limit of t he free-boundary problem in com- pressible elastodynamics. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 244(3):599–697, April 2022

2022
[35]

On the free boundary problem of t hree-dimensional incompressible euler equations

Ping Zhang and Zhifei Zhang. On the free boundary problem of t hree-dimensional incompressible euler equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal I ssued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences , 61(7):877–940, 2008. 30

2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [34]

Well-posedness and incompressible limit of curren t-vortex sheets with surface tension in compressible ideal mhd

Junyan Zhang. Well-posedness and incompressible limit of curren t-vortex sheets with surface tension in compressible ideal mhd. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11254 , 2024

arXiv 2024

[2] [32]

On the free-boundary incompressible elastodyna mics with and without surface tension, 2024

Longhui Xu. On the free-boundary incompressible elastodyna mics with and without surface tension, 2024

work page 2024

[3] [12]

Local Well-posedness of the Free Boundary Incompressible Elastodynamics with Surface Tension

Xumin Gu and Zhen Lei. Local well-posedness of the free bounda ry incompressible elastodynamics with surface tension. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.13354 , 2020

work page Pith review arXiv 2008

[4] [25]

Small viscosity and boundary layer methods: theory, stabil ity analysis, and applications

Guy M´ etivier. Small viscosity and boundary layer methods: theory, stabil ity analysis, and applications . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

work page 2012

[5] [1]

On the cauchy pro blem for gravity water waves

Thomas Alazard, Nicolas Burq, and Claude Zuily. On the cauchy pro blem for gravity water waves. Inventiones mathematicae, 198(1):71–163, 2014

work page 2014

[6] [2]

Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in two-dimensional elastodynamics

Robin Ming Chen, Jilong Hu, and Dehua Wang. Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in two-dimensional elastodynamics. Advances in Mathematics , 311:18–60, 2017

work page 2017

[7] [3]

Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics: variable coeﬃcients

Robin Ming Chen, Jilong Hu, and Dehua Wang. Linear stability of comp ressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics: variable coeﬃcients. Mathematische Annalen , 376:863–912, 2020

work page 2020

[8] [4]

Nonlinear stability and exis- tence of compressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics

Robin Ming Chen, Jilong Hu, Dehua Wang, Tao Wang, and Difan Yuan. Nonlinear stability and exis- tence of compressible vortex sheets in 2d elastodynamics. Journal of Diﬀerential Equations , 269(9):6899– 6940, 2020

work page 2020