Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Significant loss suppression and large induced chirality via cooperative near- and far-field coupling in plasmonic dimer nanoantennas

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cooperative near- and far-field coupling in L-shaped plasmonic dimers produces measured quality factors up to 3120 in the near-infrared, exceeding previous records while retaining large modulation depths and inducing chirality in achiral…

desk verdict A solid experimental benchmark—record NIR plasmonic Q of 3120 with a usable dip depth—but the record number needs its extraction details opened up before it is fully checkable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15029 v1 pith:BPIVJYQS submitted 2024-11-22 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Xiaoqing Luo , Rixing Huang , Dangyuan Lei , Guangyuan Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords plasmonicdimernanoantennassurfacelatticeresonancesnear-fieldcouplingfar-fieldqualityfactorinducedchiralitysumapproximationlosssuppression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that combining near-field coupling between the two arms of an L-shaped plasmonic dimer with far-field coupling between dimers in a periodic array suppresses plasmonic loss far beyond either mechanism alone. It reports measured quality factors up to 3120 in the near-infrared, above the previous record of 2340, while maintaining more than 50% modulation depth. It also shows that the same cooperative coupling induces circular dichroism in achiral planar dimers, with measured CD of 4% and Q of 2510. If these numbers hold, the work offers a practical route toward low-loss plasmonic metasurfaces for sensing, lasing, and chiral optics.

What carries the argument

The generalized lattice sum approximation (LSA) model represents each L-shaped dimer as a point dipole with a 2x2 polarizability tensor that includes off-diagonal elements $\alpha_{xy}$ from near-field coupling, interacting with a diagonal lattice-sum matrix with anisotropic components $S_{xx}$, $S_{yy}$ from far-field coupling. The hybridized modes appear as poles of the coupled response, with resonance condition $\mathrm{Re}\{\alpha^{-1}\} = \mathrm{Re}\{S_{\pm}\}$, where $S_{\pm}$ contains both $(\alpha_{xy}/\alpha)^2$ and $(S_{xx}-S_{yy})^2/(4S_{xx}S_{yy})$. This identity shows precisely how the off-diagonal polarizability and the anisotropy of the lattice sums conspire to produce the spectral splitting and loss redistribution.

What would settle it

Measure the same metasurface with a tunable narrow-linewidth laser and a well-collimated beam, or perform a time-domain ring-down experiment to obtain the cavity decay time; if the independently determined Q comes out substantially below 3120, the record claim would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that periodic L-shaped silver dimers support hybridized surface lattice resonances whose loss is dramatically suppressed when near-field coupling (the off-diagonal polarizability of the dimer) and far-field coupling (anisotropic lattice sums) act together. The hybridized strong coupling persists even for gap distances up to 100 nm, redistributing loss so that the antibonding mode reaches simulated Q of 4050 and measured Q of 3120 in the near-infrared, while the modulation depth stays above 50%. The same cooperative coupling, when the lattice sums are made anisotropic by breaking the square symmetry, induces chiroptical responses in intrinsically achiral dimers, with simulated g factor up to 0.48 and measured circular dichroism of 4% at a quality factor of 2510.

Load-bearing premise

The record Q of 3120 assumes that the linewidth extracted from the transmittance spectra accurately represents the intrinsic resonance width; if the dip is broadened or narrowed by the fitting procedure, angular spread of the beam, or fabrication disorder, the extracted quality factor would not be the true cavity loss.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The generalized LSA model provides an analytic design rule for hybridized SLR wavelengths and coupling strengths directly from the dimer polarizability and lattice sums.
  • Strong coupling of SLRs is robust to gap distance from 5 to 100 nm, relaxing fabrication tolerance for high-Q plasmonic metasurfaces.
  • When the gap exceeds about 50 nm, both bonding and antibonding SLRs can simultaneously have quality factors above 2000, enabling dual-band high-Q operation.
  • Induced chirality in achiral dimers can be optimized by the critical coupling conditions $\partial g/\partial \Delta\Lambda = 0$ and $\partial g_{\max}/\partial G = 0$, yielding simulated g of 0.48 and measured CD of 4%.
  • The measured quality factor of 3120 with modulation depth exceeding 50% breaks the prior near-infrared plasmonic record of 2340.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cooperative near- and far-field coupling scheme could transfer to other anisotropic unit cells, such as dielectric dimers, where lower intrinsic absorption may push Q even higher.
  • A time-domain ring-down measurement of the metasurface resonance would independently verify that the spectral linewidth corresponds to the intrinsic Q and is not narrowed by the fitting procedure or by angular averaging.
  • Because the chirality arises from lattice symmetry breaking in a planar structure, this geometry could be combined with molecular analytes for sensitive enantiomer detection without fabricating three-dimensional chiral metamaterials.
  • The critical coupling condition for optimal induced chirality might also apply to other achiral lattices where anisotropic periods are introduced, suggesting a general route to high-Q chiroptical metasurfaces.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined numerical and experimental study of periodic arrays of L-shaped silver dimer nanoantennas. It extends the standard lattice sum approximation (LSA) to include an off-diagonal polarizability term from near-field dimer coupling and anisotropic lattice sums from far-field coupling, predicting hybridized upper and lower surface lattice resonances with an anticrossing. The authors fabricate metasurfaces with varying lattice asymmetry and report transmittance spectra with a measured Q-factor up to 3120 (simulated 4050), large modulation depth, and induced chiroptical responses with CD up to 4% and Q about 2510. They interpret these results as a record low-loss plasmonic resonance and identify a critical-coupling condition for optimal induced chirality.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the work is a notable advance: it demonstrates that cooperative near- and far-field coupling can produce narrow, deep transmittance dips in plasmonic metasurfaces and induce chirality in achiral planar unit cells. The generalized LSA model is a useful extension of a standard coupled-dipole framework, and the agreement between simulated and measured spectra across several samples is a concrete strength. However, the most load-bearing quantitative claims depend on extraction and modeling details that are not given in the main text, and the strong-coupling criterion is defined in a way that may overstate the result. The work is likely significant for plasmonic metasurfaces and chiral photonics, but the current presentation does not yet allow the central claims to be independently audited.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3(b)-(e)] The record Q-factor of 3120 is not auditable from the main text. The authors report Q-factors extracted from measured transmittance spectra but do not state the fitting function, the fit range, the spectral resolution, the treatment of the asymmetric Fano-like background, or any error bars. Because the resonance has a modulation depth greater than 50% and is asymmetric, the extracted full width at half maximum and hence Q are sensitive to the fitting procedure. Please provide these details, at least in the Supplemental Material, and report uncertainty estimates for the Q values in Figs. 3(e) and 4(c).
  2. [Fig. 2(a)] The strong-coupling criterion is defined as gamma = Delta-lambda_0 / delta-lambda_max, with delta-lambda_max = max{delta-lambda_1, delta-lambda_2}. If delta-lambda_1 and delta-lambda_2 are the linewidths of the hybridized upper and lower branches, then the criterion is not the usual strong-coupling criterion, which compares the splitting with the linewidths of the uncoupled modes. Because the coupling itself redistributes loss and narrows one hybridized branch, gamma > 1 can be self-fulfilling. Please evaluate the weak-to-strong transition using uncoupled LSPR and SLR linewidths or a coupled-mode model with explicitly defined bare linewidths.
  3. [Eqs. (1)-(5), Fig. 1(b), Fig. 2(a)] The analytical predictions of the generalized LSA model depend on the polarizability components alpha and alpha_xy, yet these quantities are not defined, computed, or tabulated in the main text. Without knowing these inputs and their wavelength dependence, the reader cannot determine whether the agreement between the analytical and simulated anticrossing curves in Fig. 1(b) is a parameter-free prediction or a fit. Please provide the model inputs and a sensitivity check, or state explicitly how alpha and alpha_xy are obtained.
  4. [Eqs. (10)-(11)] The 'critical coupling condition' as written is tautological: partial g / partial Delta-Lambda = 0 and partial g_max / partial G = 0 are simply stationarity conditions for maxima. As stated, they do not provide a predictive physical condition, such as the equality of radiative and dissipative decay rates, in terms of the microscopic parameters. Please derive a closed-form condition from the model or revise the claim to avoid presenting derivative conditions as a new physical criterion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'due the near- and far-field coupling effects' is missing 'to'; it should read 'due to the near- and far-field coupling effects.'
  2. [Introduction and Conclusions] 'Specially' should be 'Specifically,' and 'state of art' should be 'state of the art.'
  3. [Fig. 3(d)-(e)] 'The deviations ... should origin from' should be 'should originate from.'
  4. [Fig. 2(a)] The symbols delta-lambda_1 and delta-lambda_2 are used in the definition of the coupling strength but are not defined in the text; please clarify that they are the linewidths of the two resonances under consideration.
  5. [Eq. (9)] The relationship between the CD defined in Eq. (9) and the Kuhn g-factor in Eq. (8), in particular the stated equivalence between g = 0.37 and CD = 4%, is deferred to SM S4; a brief statement in the main text would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are supported by independent measurements and full-wave simulations; the only tautological element is the 'critical coupling condition' (a derivative condition for a maximum), and the one self-citation is not load-bearing.

  1. renaming known result [Section on induced chirality, Eqs. (10)-(11), around Fig. 2(c)-(d)]
    "The maximum values gmax can be predicted when ∂g/∂ΔΛ = 0. By further plotting gmax as a function of the gap distance in Fig. 2(d), we find that gmax reaches the peak value of 0.48 when G ≈ 35 nm, which satisfies ∂gmax/∂G = 0. We refer to Eqs. (10) and (11) as the critical coupling condition for the optimal induced chirality due to the cooperative coupling effect."

    This is not an independent physical prediction but a restatement of the definition of an extremum: gmax is the point where ∂g/∂ΔΛ = 0 by definition, and the peak of gmax(G) is likewise where ∂gmax/∂G = 0. The value G ≈ 35 nm is read off the simulated curve, so Eqs. (10)-(11) merely rename the calculus condition for a maximum as a 'critical coupling condition.' This is a presentational tautology, not a derivation, and it does not affect the main measured Q-factor or CD claims.

full rationale

The paper's central claims — record Q = 3120, large modulation depth, and induced chirality — are established by transmittance and CD measurements on fabricated samples and by full-wave simulations, which are external benchmarks independent of the analytical model. The generalized LSA model is a standard coupled-dipole framework (Ref. [26]) extended by an off-diagonal polarizability term and anisotropic lattice sums; these terms are motivated by the dimer geometry and by prior literature, and the model is checked against simulations and experiment rather than being used to generate the headline numbers from fitted parameters. Although the main text does not state how αxy is obtained, nothing in the manuscript shows that the predicted splitting is fitted from the same experimental Q values being explained. The self-citation [25] for chirality from anisotropic far-field coupling is accompanied by external Ref. [24] and by the paper's own measured CD spectra, so it is not load-bearing. The only circular element is the 'critical coupling condition' of Eqs. (10)-(11), which is the derivative condition for a maximum presented as a physical condition. Overall, no significant circularity in the derivation chain; score 2 reflects the minor tautological step and the presence of a self-citation that is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analytical claims rest on the point-dipole representation of the dimer, the diagonal lattice-sum approximation, and the symmetry of the polarizability tensor. The model parameters α and αxy are not derived in the main text, and their values are not stated, so the analytic portion is a semi-empirical description rather than a first-principles derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • α (diagonal polarizability component) = Not stated in main text
    The model's central input; presumably obtained from isolated-dimer simulation or a Lorentzian fit, so the analytical curves are not parameter-free.
  • αxy (off-diagonal polarizability component) = Not stated in main text
    This term produces the near-field coupling and the splitting in Eq. (7); its value is not given and likely fitted or computed in the SM.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The L-shaped dimer is modeled as a single point dipole with polarizability tensor α in Eq. (2).
    The generalized LSA model neglects higher-order multipoles and the spatial extent of the dimer; higher-order corrections could alter the predicted splitting and Q.
  • domain assumption The lattice sum matrix is diagonal, S = diag(Sxx, Syy).
    The periodic array is assumed to have orthogonal principal axes, so x and y far-field coupling do not mix directly.
  • domain assumption The polarizability tensor has αxx = αyy = α and αxy = αyx.
    Assumed because the two nanorods are identical and orthogonally packed; stated in the text after Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption The resonance condition is Re{α^{-1}} = Re{S±} in Eq. (6), with imaginary parts neglected for locating the mode.
    The spectral positions are obtained by matching real parts; material absorption is introduced later for linewidths.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Significant loss suppression and large induced chirality via cooperative near- and far-field coupling in plasmonic dimer nanoantennas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BPIVJYQS

@misc{pith2026241115029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Significant loss suppression and large induced chirality via cooperative near- and far-field coupling in plasmonic dimer nanoantennas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BPIVJYQS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15029}
}
abstract

Plasmonic nanoantennas containing nano-gaps support "hotspots" for greatly enhanced light-matter interactions, but suffer from inherent high losses, a long-standing issue that hinders practical applications. Here we report a strategy to significantly suppress the losses of plasmonic dimer nanoantennas. Specifically, by introducing the concept of cooperative near- and far-field coupling, we observed an unprecedented transition from the weak coupling of localized resonances to strong coupling of collective (nonlocal) resonances, showing robustness to the gap distance between the dimer. We develop a generalized lattice sum approximation model to describe this transition and reveal its origins: the off-diagonal element of the anisotropic polarizability tensor due to near-field coupling, and the anisotropic lattice sums due to far-field coupling. This strong coupling leads to loss-suppressed plasmonic resonances with large modulation depths and meanwhile extremely high measured quality factors up to 3120 in the near-infrared regime, exceeding the record in the near infrared regime. Additionally, high-$Q$ and large chiroptical responses can also be induced for achiral planar dimers under the critical coupling condition. This work paves an avenue toward extremely low-loss plasmonic devices, either chiral or not, for diverse important applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15029 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Cooperative near- and far-field coupling in periodic L-shaped silver dimers. (a) Schematics of an isolated nanorod, an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Strong coupling, reduced losses, and induced chiril [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Simulated and measured transmittance spectra under linear-polarization. (a) SEM image and (b) transmittance spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plasmonic chiroptical responses induced by coop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Giannini, A

    V. Giannini, A. I. F.-D. S. C. Heck, and S. A. Maier, Plasmonic nanoantennas: Fundamentals and their use in controlling the radiative properties of nanoemitters, Chem. Rev. 111, 3888 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Amendola, R

    V. Amendola, R. Pilot, M. Frasconi, O. M. Marag` o, and M. A. Iat ` ı, Surface plasmon resonance in gold nanopar- ticles: a review, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 203002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Z. Cao, H. Gao, M. Qiu, W. Jin, S. Deng, K.-Y. Wong, and D. Lei, Chirality transfer from sub-nanometer bio- chemical molecules to sub-micrometer plasmonic metas- tructures: Physiochemical mechanisms, biosensing, and bioimaging opportunities, Adv. Mater. 32, 1907151 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Y. Lee, S. Kim, and J. Park, Strong coupling in plasmonic metal nanoparticles, Nano Convergence 10, 34 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Zheng, J

    G. Zheng, J. He, V. Kumar, S. Wang, I. Pastoriza-Santos, J. P´ erez-Juste, L. M. Liz-Marz´ an, and K.-Y. Wong, Chi- ral plasmonics, Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 3738 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    N. J. Halas, S. Lal, W.-S. Chang, S. Link, and P. Nord- lander, Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostruc- tures, Chem. Rev. 111, 3913 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    A. E. Schlather, N. Large, A. S. Urban, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, Near-field mediated plexcitonic coupling and giant Rabi splitting in individual metallic dimers, Nano Lett. 13, 3281 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Y. Wy, H. Jung, J. W. Hong, and S. W. Han, Exploiting plasmonic hot spots in Au-based nanostructures for sens- ing and photocatalysis, Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 831 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    X. Yin, M. Sch aferling, B. Metzger, and H. Giessen, In- terpreting chiral nanophotonic spectra: The plasmonic Born-Kuhn model, Nano Lett. 13, 6238 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Hentschel, M

    M. Hentschel, M. Sch aferling, X. Duan, H. Giessen, and N. Liu, Chiral plasmonics, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602735 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Y. Luo, C. Chi, M. Jiang, R. Li, S. Zu, Y. Li, and Z. Fang, Plasmonic chiral nanostructures: Chiroptical effects and applications, Adv. Optical Mater. 5, 1700040 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    J. T. Collins, C. Kuppe, D. C. Hooper, C. Sibilia, M. Cen- tini, and V. K. Valev, Chirality and chiroptical effects in metal nanostructures: Fundamentals and current trends, Adv. Optical Mater. 5, 1700182 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    J. Mun, M. Kim, Y. Yang, T. Badloe, C.-W. Qiu, and J. Rho, Electromagnetic chirality: from fundamentals to nontraditional chiroptical phenomena, Light: Sci. Appl. 9, 139 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Ameling and H

    R. Ameling and H. Giessen, Microcavity plasmonics: 6 strong coupling of photonic cavities and plasmons, Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 141 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    V. G. Kravets, A. V. Kabashin, W. L. Barnes, and A. N. Grigorenko, Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: A re- view of properties and applications, Chem. Rev. 118, 5912 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    W. Wang, M. Ramezani, A. I. V¨ akev¨ ainen, P. T¨ orm¨ a, J. G. Rivas, and T. W. Odom, The rich photonic world of plasmonic nanoparticle arrays, Mater. Today 21, 303 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    G. Li, X. Du, L. Xiong, and X. Yang, Plasmonic metasur- faces with quality factors up to 790 in the visible regime, Adv. Optical Mater. 11, 2301205 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    M. S. Bin-Alam, O. Reshef, Y. Mamchur, M. Z. Alam, G. Carlow, J. Upham, B. T. Sullivan, J.-M. M´ enard, M. J. Huttunen, R. W. Boyd, and K. Dolgaleva, Ultra- high-Q resonances in plasmonic metasurfaces, Nat. Com- mun. 12, 974 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    J. Lin, M. Qiu, X. Zhang, H. Guo, Q. Cai, S. Xiao, Q. He, and L. Zhou, Tailoring the lineshapes of coupled plas- monic systems based on a theory derived from first prin- ciples, Light: Sci. Appl. 9, 158 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Aigner, A

    A. Aigner, A. Tittl, J. Wang, T. Weber, Y. Kivshar, S. A. Maier, and H. Ren, Plasmonic bound states in the con- tinuum to tailor light-matter coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, eadd4816 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Liang, D

    Y. Liang, D. P. Tsai, and Y. Kivshar, From local to non- local high- Q plasmonic metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 053801 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Le-Van, E

    Q. Le-Van, E. Zoethout, E.-J. Geluk, M. Ramezani, M. Berghuis, and J. G. Rivas, Enhanced quality factors of surface lattice resonances in plasmonic arrays of nanopar- ticles, Adv. Optical Mater. 7, 1801451 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Black, Y

    L.-J. Black, Y. Wang, C. H. de Groot, A. Arbouet, and O. L. Muskens, Optimal polarization conversion in coupled dimer plasmonic nanoantennas for metasurfaces, ACS Nano 13, 6390 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Movsesyan, L

    A. Movsesyan, L. V. Besteiro, X.-T. Kong, Z. Wang, and A. O. Govorov, Engineering strongly chiral plasmonic lat- tices with achiral unit cells for sensing and photodetec- tion, Adv. Optical Mater. 9, 2101943 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    X. Luo, X. Du, R. Huang, and G. Li, High- Q and strong chiroptical responses in planar metasurfaces empowered by mie surface lattice resonances, Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2300186 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Cherqui, M

    C. Cherqui, M. R. Bourgeois, D. Wang, and G. C. Schatz, Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: Theory and com- putation, Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2548 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. Xu, C. Liu, M. Lang, Y. Zhang, M. Li, W. Lu, Z. Chen, C. Wang, S. Wang, and X. Li, Dual control of enhanced quasi-bound states in the continuum emission from resonant c-Si metasurfaces, Nano Lett. 23, 7584 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    J. M. Winkler, M. J. Ruckriegel, R. C. K. Henar Rojo, E. D. Leo, F. T. Rabouw, and D. J. Norris, Dual- wavelength lasing in quantum-dot plasmonic lattice lasers, ACS Nano 14, 5223 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    J. Guan, R. Li, X. G. Juarez, A. D. Sample, Y. Wang, G. C. Schatz, and T. W. Odom, Plasmonic nanoparti- cle lattice devices for white-light lasing, Adv. Mater. 35, 2103262 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    J. Lin, Y. Zhang, J. Qian, and S. He, A nano- plasmonic chip for simultaneous sensing with dual- resonance surface-enhanced raman scattering and local- ized surface plasmon resonance, Laser Photonics Rev. 8, 610 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    X. Chen, C. Wang, Y. Yao, and C. Wang, Plasmonic ver- tically coupled complementary antennas for dual-mode infrared molecule sensing, ACS Nano 11, 8034 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Tang and A

    Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, Enhanced enantioselectivity in excitation of chiral molecules by superchiral light, Science 332, 333 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    M. L. Solomon, A. A. E. Saleh, L. F. Tadesse, and J. A. Dionne, Nanophotonic platforms for chiral sensing and separation, Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 588 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.