Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Regularity, uniqueness and the relative size of small and large scales in SQG flows

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Supercritical SQG blow-up requires active low modes, even when high modes drive the singularity.

desk verdict New energy-based frequency-sparseness criteria for supercritical SQG, but Theorem 1.3's proof has a genuine algebraic gap and the uniqueness results are conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15040 v1 pith:JB2CAIRZ submitted 2024-11-22 math.AP

Zachary Akridge , Zachary Bradshaw This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3535B6535B44
keywords surfacequasi-geostrophicequationssupercriticaldissipationregularitycriteriauniquenessLittlewood-PaleytheoryenergymethodsfrequencysparsenessTypeIblow-up
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper addresses two open questions for the supercritical surface quasi-geostrophic (SQG) equations: whether solutions can lose smoothness in finite time, and whether weak solutions with the same initial data can be distinct. It shows that both questions are controlled by the relative sizes of small and large scales as measured by Littlewood-Paley frequency blocks. The main regularity theorem states that if the initial data has most of its H^s norm concentrated on very high frequencies, the minimum guaranteed existence time can be extended to any prescribed time. A companion blow-up theorem says that in a Type I singularity the low-frequency part must remain active, so low and high scales cannot be widely separated as blow-up develops. For non-uniqueness, the paper shows the error between two solutions sharing initial data cannot have its activity confined to high modes, and in the dynamic version low modes must be active at every time near t=0.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Littlewood-Paley decomposition θ = Σ_j Δ_j θ into dyadic frequency blocks. The paper derives a mode-by-mode energy differential inequality: for each block, d/dt ‖θ_j‖_{$L^{2}$} + $λ2^{{2αj}}$‖θ_j‖_{$L^{2}$} ≤ ‖[u,Δ_j]∇θ‖_{$L^{2}$}, where [u,Δ_j] is the commutator between the velocity and the frequency projector. The commutator is controlled by Miura's estimate, which lets the solution at time t be written as a sum of a linearly decaying term I and a time-integrated nonlinear term II. Because the dissipation term $λ2^{{2αj}}$ acts strongly on high modes, concentrating the initial data on high frequencies makes I small at a chosen time, while II is made small by picking that time appropriately; this replaces the unavailable mild solution estimates.

What would settle it

For Theorem 1.2, exhibit a supercritical SQG solution satisfying the Type I bounds whose blow-up occurs with liminf_{t→T_max} ‖Δ_{<J(t)}θ‖_{H^s}/‖Δ_{≥J(t)}θ‖_{H^s} = 0 for J(t) defined by $2^{{2αJ(t)}}$ ∼ (T_max - t)^{-1}; that would violate the lower bound c_* > 0. For Theorem 1.1, construct initial data satisfying the frequency-concentration condition (1) whose solution blows up before the prescribed time T*.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a set of conditional criteria relating frequency-scale balance to regularity and uniqueness. Theorem 1.1 states that for s in (2-2α, 2-α), if the initial data satisfies ‖Δ_{<J}θ0‖_{H^s} ≤ γ/(4C_b)‖Δ_{≥J}θ0‖_{H^s} for J large enough, then the unique strong solution exists on (0,T*) and its H^s norm stays within twice the initial value. Theorem 1.2 turns this around: any Type I blow-up solution must satisfy inf_t ‖Δ_{<J(t)}θ‖_{H^s}/‖Δ_{≥J(t)}θ‖_{H^s} > c_* > 0, where J(t) is tied to the remaining time by $2^{{2αJ(t)}}$ ∼ (T_max - t)^{-1}. Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 apply the same scale-balance idea to non-uniqueness: if the error between two solutions has high modes dominating a fixed low-mode block near t=0, the error must be zero, and a dynamic version forces low modes to be active at all small times. These results extend frequency-scale arguments previously developed for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, and the proofs use energy methods rather than mild solution theory.

Load-bearing premise

Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 assume a differential energy inequality for the error, such as ∂_t‖w_{<J}‖²_{$L^{2}$} ≤ -2∫(R^⊥w·∇θ_1 + R^⊥θ_2·∇w)_{<J}w_{<J} dx, which the authors do not derive from the weak formulation; the uniqueness conclusions stand only if these inequalities actually hold for Marchand-class solutions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1.1 is correct, then any finite-time singularity developing from smooth data must originate from data whose low-frequency part carries a definite proportion of the H^s norm; data dominated by very small scales yields a longer existence window.
  • Theorem 1.2 implies that in a Type I blow-up, frequencies around the scale set by 2^{2αJ(t)} ∼ (T_max - t)^{-1} must hold a fixed fraction of the H^s norm at every time leading up to the singularity.
  • Theorem 1.3 provides an endpoint regularity criterion in which only scales larger than a time-dependent threshold appear, meaning smallness of the low-frequency Besov norm alone is enough to rule out a first blow-up time.
  • Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 say that in any hypothetical non-uniqueness scenario for supercritical SQG, the error must have both low and high modes active at all small times; an error whose high modes dominate is forced to be zero.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mode-by-mode energy argument in Proposition 3.1 is written generically enough that it could serve as a template for other supercritical dissipative equations where mild solution techniques fail, though the paper does not pursue that transfer.
  • For self-similar non-uniqueness in supercritical SQG, Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 suggest the error's activity would have to begin at infinitesimally small scales and then propagate to larger scales, mirroring the Navier-Stokes picture that inspired the analysis.
  • A computational test of Theorem 1.2 is conceivable: in numerical simulations of forced supercritical SQG approaching a suspected singularity, one could track the ratio ‖Δ_{<J(t)}θ‖/‖Δ_{≥J(t)}θ‖ and check whether it stays above the predicted positive bound as t nears T_max.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the supercritically dissipative surface quasi-geostrophic equations (0<α<1/2) and investigates how the relative sizes of low and high Littlewood-Paley frequencies constrain possible blow-up and non-uniqueness. Theorem 1.1 shows that if the initial data is sufficiently concentrated on high frequencies, then the local solution can be continued up to any prescribed time T* with the Ḣ^s norm controlled by twice its initial value. Theorem 1.2 derives a necessary condition for Type I blow-up: low modes must remain active in the sense that the ratio of low-to-high Ḣ^s norms is bounded below along a time-dependent frequency threshold. Theorem 1.3 states an endpoint regularity criterion involving only low modes below a frequency set by the Ḣ^s norm. Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 give conditional uniqueness criteria for Marchand-type weak solutions, assuming energy differential inequalities for the error w=θ1−θ2 that are not derived. The proofs use energy methods and Miura's commutator estimate in place of the mild solution techniques used in prior Navier-Stokes work.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper extends the 'frequency sparseness' approach of Albritton–Bradshaw and Bradshaw from 3D Navier-Stokes to supercritical SQG, where mild-solution estimates are unavailable. The main technical contribution is Proposition 3.1, whose mode-by-mode energy estimate using Miura's commutator inequality is careful and plausible, and it supports Theorems 1.1 and 1.2. The paper is also explicit about the conditional nature of the uniqueness theorems, which is a strength in clarity. However, the proof of Theorem 1.3 contains a specific algebraic error in replacing the full Ḣ^s norm by the low-mode norm, so that theorem is not established as written. The conditional energy inequalities in Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 are stated as assumptions, limiting the reach of the uniqueness conclusions. Overall, the central regularity results appear sound, but the paper requires a correction to the proof of Theorem 1.3 before the full set of claims is reliable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.3] The displayed inequality ‖Δ_{<J(t)}θ(t)‖²_{Ḣ^s} ≤ C(s,α)‖θ‖²_{L∞(0,T∗; Ḃ^{2−2α}_{2,∞})}‖Δ_{<J(t)}θ(t)‖²_{Ḣ^s} is not a consequence of the preceding estimate. The preceding line gives ‖Δ_{<J}θ(t)‖²_{Ḣ^s} ≤ C‖θ‖²_{L∞(0,T∗; Ḃ^{2−2α}_{2,∞})} 2^{2J(s−2+2α)}, and substituting 2^{(2−s+2α)J} = C(s,α)‖θ(t)‖_{Ḣ^s} yields 2^{2J(s−2+2α)} = C(s,α)‖θ(t)‖_{Ḣ^s}^{-2}. Hence the correct bound has the full Ḣ^s norm in the denominator, not the low-mode norm ‖Δ_{<J}θ(t)‖_{Ḣ^s}. The subsequent inequality involving ‖Δ_{≥J}θ(t)‖² and the application of Proposition 3.1 rely on this erroneous substitution, so the proof of Theorem 1.3 is incomplete as written.
  2. [Section 1.2, Theorems 1.4 and 1.5] Both uniqueness theorems assume energy differential inequalities for the error w, such as ∂_t‖w_{<J}‖²_{L2} ≤ −2∫(R⊥w·∇θ1 + R⊥θ2·∇w)_{<J} w_{<J} dx in Theorem 1.4, and the paper states only that these are 'reasonable to expect' for Marchand's solutions. No derivation from the weak formulation is provided, and it is not shown that the classes of solutions under consideration actually satisfy these inequalities. Consequently, the uniqueness conclusions are conditional on unverified hypotheses. The authors should either supply a proof of these inequalities for Marchand solutions or reformulate the theorems with the inequalities as explicit standing assumptions and discuss the resulting limitations more prominently.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1, Theorem 1.1 and its proof] The exponent of T∗ is displayed as '1 + (s−2+sα)/(2α)', but the derivation in the proof of Theorem 1.1 and the application in Theorem 1.2 indicate that the correct exponent should be (s−2+4α)/(2α), equivalently 1 + (s−2+2α)/(2α). This typo should be corrected in both the statement and the proof.
  2. [Section 2.2, inequality (2)] The commutator estimate states 'g ∈ Ḣ^s' but the estimate involves the space Ḣ^t; g should be assumed to belong to Ḣ^t, with the constant depending on s and t as written.
  3. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.3] In the low-mode estimate, the expression uses ‖Δ_j θ(t_M)‖_{L2} at an escape time t_M, but the argument is being made for an arbitrary time t; this appears to be a typo for θ(t).
  4. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 1.5] In the interpolation step, the term 'C‖∇w‖_q‖w‖_p^i' should read 'C‖∇θ1‖_q‖w‖_p^i'.
  5. [General] There are several typographical issues, including 'la rge' in the abstract and 'does not need to built in' in the paragraph after Theorem 1.2.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Theorem 1.3's proof substitutes the low-mode norm for the total H^s norm in the denominator, making the smallness inequality self-referential and the claimed endpoint criterion not derived as written.

  1. other [Proof of Theorem 1.3, Section 3 (pp. 10-11), in the paragraph beginning 'Now choose t′ ...'.]
    "‖∆<J θ(t)‖²_Ḣ^s ≤ ∑_{j<J} 2^{2js}‖∆jθ(tM)‖²_L2 ≲ ‖∆<J θ‖²_Ḃ^{2-2α}_{2,∞} 2^{2J(s-2+2α)}. ... Define J = J(t) so that equality holds in the preceding inequality. Then 2^{(2-s+2α)J} = C(s, α)‖θ(t)‖_Ḣ^s, and so ‖∆<J(t)θ(t)‖²_Ḣ^s ≤ C(s, α)‖θ‖²_{L∞(0,T*;Ḃ^{2-2α}_{2,∞})}‖∆<J(t)θ(t)‖²_Ḣ^s."

    Let S=‖Δ_{<J}θ(t)‖²_{Ḣ^s} and B=‖θ‖_{L∞(0,T*;Ḃ^{2-2α}_{2,∞})}. The preceding line gives S ≲ B² 2^{2J(s-2+2α)}. Using the stated definition 2^{(2-s+2α)J}=C‖θ(t)‖_{Ḣ^s}, substitution yields S ≲ C B² / ‖θ(t)‖²_{Ḣ^s}, with the total norm in the denominator. The next displayed inequality instead writes S ≤ C B² S, i.e., the total norm in the denominator has been replaced by the low-mode norm S that the proof is trying to show is small. This replacement is not a consequence of the displayed definition; it feeds the target quantity back into the estimate. The final bound S ≤ C B²/(1-C B²)‖Δ_{≥J}θ‖², and hence the applicability of Proposition 3.1, rests on this self-referential substitution and does not follow as printed.

full rationale

The central regularity mechanism is independent: Proposition 3.1 derives the high-frequency concentration criterion from a commutator estimate of Miura and energy inequalities, with no fitted parameter and no reliance on the authors' prior results. Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are direct consequences of Proposition 3.1, and Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 explicitly assume their energy inequalities, so those are hypotheses rather than circular outputs. The paper's self-citations to Albritton-Bradshaw and Bradshaw are motivational and do not carry the derivation. The one concrete circularity-adjacent defect is in the proof of Theorem 1.3, where, after defining the cutoff J in terms of the total Ḣ^s norm, the key estimate replaces that total norm by the low-mode norm, producing a self-referential inequality S ≤ C B² S. Because this affects one secondary theorem while the main regularity and uniqueness arguments remain independent, the overall circularity is partial rather than wholesale.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard harmonic analysis tools and the authors' assumed energy inequalities. No free parameters are fitted to data; the constants are universal. The most fragile inputs are the two energy inequalities in the uniqueness theorems, which are stated as hypotheses without proof.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Littlewood-Paley theory and Besov space characterizations, including Bernstein inequalities
    Used throughout to decompose solutions and estimate frequency-localized norms.
  • standard math Miura's commutator estimate: ‖[f, ˙Δ_j]g‖_{L^2} ≤ C 2^{-(s+t-1)j} c_j ‖f‖_{˙H^s}‖g‖_{˙H^t} for 1 ≤ s<2, t<1, s+t>1
    External result invoked in Proposition 3.1 to control the nonlinear term.
  • domain assumption Existence and properties of Marchand weak solutions, including maximum principle in L^p
    Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 assume two weak solutions in this class with same initial data and L^p bounds on θ1.
  • ad hoc to paper Energy differential inequality for the error in Theorem 1.4: ∂_t‖w_{<J}‖^2_{L^2} ≤ -2∫(R^⊥w·∇θ1 + R^⊥θ2·∇w)_{<J}w_{<J} dx
    Assumed without derivation; the authors call it 'reasonable to expect' but provide no proof.
  • ad hoc to paper Energy differential inequality in Theorem 1.5: ∂_t‖w‖_p^p + p‖Λ^{2α/p}w‖_p^p ≤ -C∫R^⊥w·∇θ1·|w|^{p-2}w dx
    Assumed as a hypothesis; the conclusion w=0 follows only if this inequality holds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity, uniqueness and the relative size of small and large scales in SQG flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JB2CAIRZ

@misc{pith2026241115040,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity, uniqueness and the relative size of small and large scales in SQG flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JB2CAIRZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15040}
}
read the original abstract

The problem of regularity and uniqueness are open for the supercritically dissipative surface quasi-geostrophic equations in certain classes. In this note we examine the extent to which small or large scales are necessarily active both for the temperature in a hypothetical blow-up scenario and for the error in hypothetical non-uniqueness scenarios, the latter understood within the class of Marchand's solutions. This extends prior work for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations. The extension is complicated by the fact that mild solution techniques are unavailable for supercritical SQG. This forces us to develop a new approach using energy methods and Littlewood-Paley theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Remarks on spars eness and regularity of Navier- Stokes solutions

    Dallas Albritton and Zachary Bradshaw. Remarks on spars eness and regularity of Navier- Stokes solutions. Nonlinearity, 35(6):2858–2877, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Non-un iqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations

    Dallas Albritton, Elia Bru´ e, and Maria Colombo. Non-un iqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations. Ann. of Math. (2) , 196(1):415–455, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations , volume 343 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]

    Hajer Bahouri, Jean-Yves Chemin, and Rapha¨ el Danchin. Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations , volume 343 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Remarks on the separation of Navier-S tokes flows

    Zachary Bradshaw. Remarks on the separation of Navier-S tokes flows. Nonlinearity, 37(9):Pa- per No. 095023, 33, 2024. 12

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    An al gebraic reduction of the ‘scaling gap’ in the Navier-Stokes regularity problem

    Zachary Bradshaw, Aseel Farhat, and Zoran Gruji´ c. An al gebraic reduction of the ‘scaling gap’ in the Navier-Stokes regularity problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 231(3):1983–2005, 2019

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Frequency localized regularity criteria for the 3D Navier- Stokes equations

    Zachary Bradshaw and Zoran Gruji´ c. Frequency localized regularity criteria for the 3D Navier- Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 224(1):125–133, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Non uniqueness of weak solutions to the SQG equation

    Tristan Buckmaster, Steve Shkoller, and Vlad Vicol. Non uniqueness of weak solutions to the SQG equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 72(9):1809–1874, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    On the regularity conditions for the dissip ative quasi-geostrophic equations

    Dongho Chae. On the regularity conditions for the dissip ative quasi-geostrophic equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 37(5):1649–1656, 2006

    work page 2006

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Gener- alized surface quasi-geostrophic equations with singular velocities

    Dongho Chae, Peter Constantin, Diego C´ ordoba, Francisco Gancedo, and Jiahong Wu. Gener- alized surface quasi-geostrophic equations with singular velocities. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 65(8):1037–1066, 2012

    2012

  2. [10]

    Non-uniqueness o f steady-state weak solutions to the surface quasi-geostrophic equations

    Xinyu Cheng, Hyunju Kwon, and Dong Li. Non-uniqueness o f steady-state weak solutions to the surface quasi-geostrophic equations. Comm. Math. Phys. , 388(3):1281–1295, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Cheskidov and R

    A. Cheskidov and R. Shvydkoy. The regularity of weak sol utions of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations in B−1 ∞,∞. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 195(1):159–169, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Cheskidov and R

    A. Cheskidov and R. Shvydkoy. A unified approach to regul arity problems for the 3D Navier- Stokes and Euler equations: the use of Kolmogorov’s dissipa tion range. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 16(2):263–273, 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    Majda, and Esteban Tabak

    Peter Constantin, Andrew J. Majda, and Esteban Tabak. F ormation of strong fronts in the 2-D quasigeostrophic thermal active scalar. Nonlinearity, 7(6):1495–1533, 1994

    1994

  6. [14]

    Lon g time dynamics of forced critical SQG

    Peter Constantin, Andrei Tarfulea, and Vlad Vicol. Lon g time dynamics of forced critical SQG. Comm. Math. Phys. , 335(1):93–141, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Nonlinear maximum pri nciples for dissipative linear nonlocal operators and applications

    Peter Constantin and Vlad Vicol. Nonlinear maximum pri nciples for dissipative linear nonlocal operators and applications. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 22(5):1289–1321, 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Regularity of H¨ older continuous solutions of the supercriti- cal quasi-geostrophic equation

    Peter Constantin and Jiahong Wu. Regularity of H¨ older continuous solutions of the supercriti- cal quasi-geostrophic equation. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 25(6):1103–1110, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    Regularity criterion and energy conservatio n for the supercritical quasi-geostrophic equation

    Mimi Dai. Regularity criterion and energy conservatio n for the supercritical quasi-geostrophic equation. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 19(2):191–202, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Regularity criter ia for the dissipative quasi-geostrophic equations in H¨ older spaces

    Hongjie Dong and Nataˇ sa Pavlovi´ c. Regularity criter ia for the dissipative quasi-geostrophic equations in H¨ older spaces. Comm. Math. Phys. , 290(3):801–812, 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    A regularity criterion for the dissipative quasi-geostrophic equations

    Hongjie Dong and Nataˇ sa Pavlovi´ c. A regularity criterion for the dissipative quasi-geostrophic equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 26(5):1607–1619, 2009

    2009

  12. [20]

    Gruji´ c

    Z. Gruji´ c. A geometric measure-type regularity crite rion for solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes equations. Nonlinearity, 26(1):289–296, 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    Time-global regularity o f the navier-stokes system with hyper- dissipation–turbulent scenario

    Zoran Gruji´ c and Liaosha Xu. Time-global regularity o f the navier-stokes system with hyper- dissipation–turbulent scenario. preprint arxiv:2012.05 692. 13

    2012

  14. [22]

    Asymptotic criticality o f the Navier-Stokes regularity problem

    Zoran Gruji´ c and Liaosha Xu. Asymptotic criticality o f the Navier-Stokes regularity problem. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 26(3):Paper No. 53, 44, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Numerical investigations of non-uniqueness for the Navier- Stokes initial value problem in borderline spaces

    Julien Guillod and Vladim ´ ır Sverak. Numerical investigations of non-uniqueness for the Navier- Stokes initial value problem in borderline spaces. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 25(3):Paper No. 46, 25, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Held, Raymond T

    Isaac M. Held, Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, Stephen T. Gar ner, and Kyle L. Swanson. Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. , 282:1–20, 1995

    1995

  17. [25]

    Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self-similar solu tions

    Hao Jia and Vladim ´ ır Sverak. Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self-similar solu tions. Invent. Math. , 196(1):233–265, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    Are the incompressible 3d N avier-Stokes equations locally ill- posed in the natural energy space? J

    Hao Jia and Vladimir Sverak. Are the incompressible 3d N avier-Stokes equations locally ill- posed in the natural energy space? J. Funct. Anal. , 268(12):3734–3766, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    Jolly, Anuj Kumar, and Vincent R

    Michael S. Jolly, Anuj Kumar, and Vincent R. Martinez. O n the existence, uniqueness, and smoothing of solutions to the generalized SQG equations in c ritical Sobolev spaces. Comm. Math. Phys. , 387(1):551–596, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Existence and uniqueness of the solution to the dissipative 2D quasi-geostrophic equations in the Sobolev space

    Ning Ju. Existence and uniqueness of the solution to the dissipative 2D quasi-geostrophic equations in the Sobolev space. Comm. Math. Phys. , 251(2):365–376, 2004

    2004

  21. [29]

    A variation on a the me of Caffarelli and Vasseur

    Aexander Kiselev and Fedor Nazarov. A variation on a the me of Caffarelli and Vasseur. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. ( POMI), 370(Kraevye Zadachi Matematichesko ˘ ı Fiziki i Smezhnye Voprosy Teorii Funktsi˘ ı. 40):58–72, 220, 2009

    2009

  22. [30]

    Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation

    Alexander Kiselev, Fedor Nazarov, and Alexander Volbe rg. Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation. Invent. Math. , 167(3):445–453, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    Surface quasi-geostrophy

    Guillaume Lapeyre. Surface quasi-geostrophy. Fluids, 2(1):7, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    A class of large so lutions to the supercritical surface quasi-geostrophic equation

    Jianli Liu, Kejia Pan, and Jiahong Wu. A class of large so lutions to the supercritical surface quasi-geostrophic equation. Nonlinearity, 32(12):5049–5059, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Existence and regularity of weak solu tions to the quasi-geostrophic equations in the spaces Lp or ˙H −1/2

    Fabien Marchand. Existence and regularity of weak solu tions to the quasi-geostrophic equations in the spaces Lp or ˙H −1/2. Comm. Math. Phys. , 277(1):45–67, 2008

    2008

  26. [34]

    Dissipative quasi-geostrophic equat ion for large initial data in the critical Sobolev space

    Hideyuki Miura. Dissipative quasi-geostrophic equat ion for large initial data in the critical Sobolev space. Comm. Math. Phys. , 267(1):141–157, 2006

    2006

  27. [35]

    Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the 3 dimensional quasi-geostrophic equations

    Matthew Novack. Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the 3 dimensional quasi-geostrophic equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 52(4):3301–3349, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    On regularity criterion for the dissipative q uasi-geostrophic equations

    Jia Yuan. On regularity criterion for the dissipative q uasi-geostrophic equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 340(1):334–339, 2008. Zachary Bradshaw, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Un iversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; e-mail: zb002@uark.edu Zachary Akridge, Depar...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.