Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Differential systems in Sobolev spaces with generic inhomogeneous boundary conditions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One finite matrix captures solvability of ODE boundary problems.

desk verdict An honest survey of the authors' own program with a modest but genuine p=∞ multipoint extension; core theorems are sound, but the new results lack proofs and Example 4 has real typos. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15330 v1 pith:OQV44FAB submitted 2024-11-22 math.CA math.AP

Vladimir Mikhailets , Olena Atlasiuk This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath.AP MSC 34B0534B0834B1047A53
keywords boundary-valueproblemSobolevspaceFredholmoperatorindexofcharacteristicmatrixcontinuityinparameterlimittheoremordinarydifferentialequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that for linear systems of ordinary differential equations of arbitrary order on a finite interval, the most general continuous inhomogeneous boundary condition can be reduced to a finite matrix. Its main theorems state that the map $(L,B)$ from the Sobolev space $(W^{n+r}_p)^m$ to $(W^n_p)^m \times \mathbb{C}^l$ is Fredholm with index $rm-l$, and that the dimensions of its kernel and cokernel equal those of a characteristic matrix $M(L,B)$ built by applying $B$ to fundamental solutions of the homogeneous equation. This matters because existence, uniqueness, and non-degeneracy of such boundary-value problems become finite rank computations instead of infinite-dimensional analysis. The paper also gives a criterion for continuous dependence of solutions on a parameter and limit theorems for multipoint problems. It flags that for $p=\infty$ the representation of all boundary operators that justifies the 'most general' class does not hold, so the explicit matrix computations rest on the case $1\le p<\infty$.

What carries the argument

The characteristic matrix $M(L,B)=([BY_1],\dots,[BY_r])\in\mathbb{C}^{l\times rm}$, whose $k$-th block column is the result of applying the boundary operator $B$ to the $k$-th fundamental solution matrix $Y_k$ of the homogeneous equation with initial conditions $Y_k^{(j-1)}(a)=\delta_{kj}I_m$. The other load-bearing piece is the representation (5) of every continuous boundary operator on $W^{n+r}_p$, for $1\le p<\infty$, as a finite sum of point evaluations of derivatives plus an integral against a matrix-valued $L_{p'}$ kernel; this is what makes the boundary conditions 'generic' and makes the matrix $M$ explicitly computable in examples. The matrix $M$ carries the argument because Theorem 2 equates its kernel and cokernel dimensions with those of $(L,B)$, converting solvability questions to finite linear algebra. The proof of Theorem 1 also uses the stability of Fredholm index under compact additive perturbations.

What would settle it

Take a concrete system and boundary operator $B$ of the form (5), build $M(L,B)$ from the fundamental solutions, solve the homogeneous equation directly, and compare $\dim\ker(L,B)$ with $\dim\ker M(L,B)$; any mismatch would disprove Theorem 2. A sharper test for the $p=\infty$ boundary of the claim is to exhibit a continuous operator $B$ on $(W^{n+r}_\infty)^m$ that is not representable by (5), for instance one defined by integration against a purely finitely additive measure, and check whether the dimension equalities still hold; failure would delimit the generic-class statement to $1\le p<\infty$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for an arbitrary-order linear system of ordinary differential equations on a finite interval, with a boundary condition given by any continuous linear operator $B:(W^{n+r}_p)^m \to \mathbb{C}^l$, the operator $(L,B):(W^{n+r}_p)^m \to (W^n_p)^m \times \mathbb{C}^l$ is Fredholm with index $rm-l$. Its central new statement is that $\dim\ker(L,B)=\dim\ker M(L,B)$ and $\dim\operatorname{coker}(L,B)=\dim\operatorname{coker} M(L,B)$, where the characteristic matrix $M(L,B)\in\mathbb{C}^{l\times rm}$ has block columns $[BY_1],\dots,[BY_r]$ formed by applying $B$ to the fundamental solution matrices $Y_i$ of the homogeneous system. In particular, when $l=rm$, the boundary-value problem is invertible exactly when $M(L,B)$ is nonsingular. The paper further proves that solutions depend continuously on a parameter precisely under nondegeneracy plus strong convergence of coefficients and boundary operators, and gives multipoint limit theorems; the $p=\infty$ case is singled out as containing additional boundary operators beyond the representation used for $1\le p<\infty$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every continuous boundary operator on $W^{n+r}_p$ has the form (5): finitely many point evaluations of derivatives plus an integral against a matrix-valued $L_{p'}$ kernel, a representation the paper imports from [19] and which is only valid for $1\le p<\infty$; for $p=\infty$ the paper notes additional boundary operators exist, so the 'most general' class and the explicit matrix computations are anchored to $p<\infty$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every system of the form (2)-(3), the operator $(L,B)$ is Fredholm with index $rm-l$, so its solvability is governed by finite-dimensional data.
  • The dimensions of $\ker(L,B)$ and $\operatorname{coker}(L,B)$ equal those of $M(L,B)$, so existence and uniqueness for arbitrary right-hand sides can be decided by rank computations on an $l\times rm$ matrix.
  • When $l=rm$ and $M(L,B)$ is nonsingular, the boundary-value problem is well posed and has a unique solution for every $f$ and $c$.
  • If a sequence of problems converges strongly to $(L,B)$, then for all large $k$ the kernel and cokernel dimensions do not exceed those of the limit; in particular, invertibility of the limit problem passes to all nearby problems.
  • Solutions depend continuously on a parameter exactly when the limit problem is nondegenerate and the coefficients and boundary operators converge strongly; the error between solution and limit is bounded both above and below by the discrepancy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Theorem 2 extends unchanged to boundary operators for $p=\infty$ that are not covered by representation (5), then $d$-characteristics can still be read off from a matrix built from fundamental solutions; if it does not, a separate theory for finitely additive boundary operators would be needed.
  • The upper semicontinuity in Theorem 4 suggests that numerical discretizations or approximations of boundary conditions are stable in dimension: a small strong perturbation cannot enlarge kernel or cokernel dimensions, protecting computed ranks.
  • Theorem 6's two-sided error-discrepancy estimate offers a route to computable a posteriori error bounds for parameter-dependent problems, provided the constants $\gamma_1,\gamma_2$ can be bounded explicitly in terms of the characteristic matrix.
  • A natural neighbouring problem is whether the multipoint averaging principle of Theorems 7 and 8 carries over to fractional Sobolev-Slobodetskii spaces, where point evaluations of fractional derivatives are less tame.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey of Fredholm properties and solvability of linear systems of ordinary differential equations of order r on a finite interval with the most general linear continuous boundary conditions in Sobolev spaces W^{n+r}_p. The main results are Theorem 1, identifying the operator (L,B) as Fredholm with index rm - l, and Theorem 2, asserting that the kernel and cokernel dimensions of (L,B) coincide with those of the block characteristic matrix M(L,B) defined in (9). The paper also reviews convergence of characteristic matrices, continuity of solutions with respect to a parameter, and multipoint limit theorems. Theorems are stated with proofs or references to previous papers, and examples are provided to illustrate the characteristic-matrix construction.

Significance. The reduction of solvability of generic boundary-value problems to the linear algebra of M(L,B) is a clean and useful result, and the paper's systematization of results from [31], [6], [2], and [7] is valuable for researchers working on boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces. The paper is transparent about which results are cited and which are new, and the stated p=∞ limitation of the point-evaluation representation (5) is clearly acknowledged. The central theorems are credible and correctly attributed. However, the examples contain nontrivial formula errors that must be corrected for the paper to be reliable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Example 3] The displayed derivative formula Y2^{(k)}(t) = (-1)^k A^k exp(-A(t-a)) for k = 0,...,n+1 contradicts the definition Y2(t) = φ(A,t) given two lines earlier; in particular, for k = 0 it gives Y2(t) = exp(-A(t-a)), which violates the initial condition Y2(a) = 0 used in the fundamental system (7)-(8). Consequently, the formula for [BY2] and the resulting characteristic matrix are incorrect. The correct derivatives are Y2^{(k)}(t) = (-1)^{k-1} A^{k-1} exp(-A(t-a)) for k ≥ 1 with Y2(t) = A^{-1}(I - exp(-A(t-a))) (understood via the entire functional calculus), and the example should be recomputed accordingly.
  2. [Section 3, Example 4] The formulas for [BY1] and [BY2] are internally inconsistent and do not follow from the fundamental system of y'' + Ay = 0. For example, the α_k terms with even k in the displayed formula for [BY2] are generally non-zero, but the fundamental solution Y2(t) = (√A)^{-1} sin(√A(t-a)) and all its even-order derivatives vanish at t = a; conversely, the odd-order β_k terms in [BY1] are grouped with both sin and cos factors in a way that does not match the derivatives of Y1(t) = cos(√A(t-a)). The displayed block characteristic matrix is therefore not reliable, and the example should be recomputed systematically from the stated fundamental solutions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Definition 1 and Section 3] The block dimensions are stated incorrectly: [BYk] is an l×m matrix, not m×l, and the characteristic matrix belongs to C^{l×rm}, not C^{m×l} or C^{2m×l}. Please correct the dimensions in Definition 1 and in the examples (e.g., Example 3 states M(L,B) ∈ C^{2m×l}).
  2. [Section 2, after Definition 1] The sentence 'Here, mr is the number of scalar differential equations of the system (2)' is incorrect; the system (2) consists of m scalar differential equations, and rm is the dimension of the solution space of the homogeneous equation.
  3. [Example 2] The example uses Caputo fractional derivatives of orders β_{kj} in the boundary operator without stating the admissible range of β_{kj}; for the operator to be bounded on W^{n+1}_p, one should specify the appropriate Sobolev regularity condition on the fractional orders.
  4. [Section 4, Theorem 3] The convergence M(L(k),B(k)) → M(L,B) is stated without specifying the matrix norm; presumably this is entrywise convergence or convergence in any norm on C^{l×rm}, but it would be clearer to make this explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central Fredholm and characteristic-matrix theorems rest on independent published results, not on self-referential construction.

full rationale

The paper is a survey that transparently sources its main results: Theorems 1, 2, and 4 are attributed to [31], Theorems 5 and 6 to [6], and Theorems 7 and 8 to [2] and the criterion in [7]. These are self-citations, but they point to published proofs with stated assumptions that do not include the target results; no fitted parameters or constructed predictions are involved, so the citations constitute independent support rather than circularity. The representation (5), imported from the external monograph [19], is used for the constructive examples and is explicitly restricted to 1 <= p < infinity, with the paper itself noting that p = infinity admits additional operators generated by finitely additive measures. Moreover, the Fredholm-index assertion of Theorem 1 rests on stability of the index under compact perturbations, not on representation (5), and Theorem 2's d-characteristic equalities are nontrivial facts about the relation between (L,B) and the characteristic matrix, not definitional equivalences. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no unverified uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The genuine limitations noted in the manuscript—unproved theorems in the survey, the p = infinity gap, and apparent typos in Examples 3 and 4—affect exposition, not the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no postulated physical entities. Its claims rest on standard Sobolev space facts, Fredholm index stability, and existence and uniqueness for matrix Cauchy problems of linear ODE systems. These are listed in the axioms.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The dual of W^{n+r}_p([a,b];C^m) for 1≤p<∞ is represented by boundary evaluations plus an integral against an L_{p'} kernel, as in formula (5).
    Invoked to argue that the boundary operators in (4) are the most general and to compute characteristic matrices in Section 3. Imported from [19].
  • standard math The Sobolev spaces W^{n+r}_p on a finite interval embed continuously into C^{n+r-1}, and pointwise multiplication behaves as needed for the operator L.
    Used to justify the boundedness of the operator (L,B) in (6) and the well-definedness of multipoint evaluations in Section 6, including the embedding (21).
  • standard math Fredholm index is stable under compact additive perturbations, and the relevant properties of Fredholm operators hold for the spaces considered.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1, which is only sketched and cited to [4].
  • standard math The matrix Cauchy problems (7)-(8) have unique solutions in (W^{n+r}_p)^{m×m}.
    Needed to define the fundamental matrix solutions Y_i and hence the characteristic matrix in Definition 1. Cited to [31, Lemma 4.1].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Differential systems in Sobolev spaces with generic inhomogeneous boundary conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OQV44FAB

@misc{pith2026241115330,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Differential systems in Sobolev spaces with generic inhomogeneous boundary conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OQV44FAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15330}
}
read the original abstract

The paper contains a review of results on linear systems of ordinary differential equations of an arbitrary order on a finite interval with the most general inhomogeneous boundary conditions in Sobolev spaces. The character of the solvability of such problems is investigated, their Fredholm properties are established, and their indexes and the dimensions of their kernels and co-kernels are found. In addition, necessary and sufficient conditions of continuity in the parameter of the solutions of the introduced classes of boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces of an arbitrary order are obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    The solvability of inhomogeneous boundary-value prob- lems in Sobolev spaces

    Mikhailets V., Atlasiuk O. The solvability of inhomogeneous boundary-value prob- lems in Sobolev spaces . Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis 2024, 18(2) (12). doi:10.1007/s43037-023-00316-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s43037-023-00316-8 2024

  2. [6]

    On differential systems in Sobolev spaces with generic inho- mogeneous boundary conditions

    Atlasiuk O., Mikhailets V. On differential systems in Sobolev spaces with generic inho- mogeneous boundary conditions. Trends in Mathematics 2024, 5, 37–47. doi:10.1007/978- 3-031-57005-6 5

    doi:10.1007/978- 2024

  3. [2]

    Limit theorems for solutions of multipoint boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces

    Atlasiuk O.M. Limit theorems for solutions of multipoint boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces. J. Math. Sci. 2020, 247 (2), 238–247. doi:10.1007/s10958-020-04799-w

    doi:10.1007/s10958-020-04799-w 2020

  4. [7]

    On Fredholm parameter-dependent boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces

    Atlasiuk O.M., Mikhailets V.A. On Fredholm parameter-dependent boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces . Dopov. Nats. Acad. Nauk Ukr. 2020, (6), 3–6. doi:10.15407/dopovidi2020.06.003

    work page doi:10.15407/dopovidi2020.06.003 2020

  5. [1]

    Criteria of correctness of linear boundary value problems f or systems of generalized ordinary differential equations

    Ashordia M. Criteria of correctness of linear boundary value problems f or systems of generalized ordinary differential equations . Czechoslovak Math. J. 1996, 46 (3), 385–404

    work page 1996

  6. [3]

    Limit theorems for solutions of multipoint boundary-value problems with a parameter in Sobolev spaces

    Atlasiuk O.M. Limit theorems for solutions of multipoint boundary-value problems with a parameter in Sobolev spaces . Ukrain. Math. J. 2021, 72 (8), 1175–1184. doi:10.1007/s11253-020-01859-x

    doi:10.1007/s11253-020-01859-x 2021

  7. [4]

    Fredholm one-dimensional boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces

    Atlasiuk O.M., Mikhailets V.A. Fredholm one-dimensional boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces. Ukrain. Math. J. 2019, 70 (10), 1526–1537. doi:10.1007/s11253-019-01588- w 14

    work page doi:10.1007/s11253-019-01588- 2019

  8. [5]

    Fredholm one-dimensional boundary-value problems with parameter in Sobolev spaces

    Atlasiuk O.M., Mikhailets V.A. Fredholm one-dimensional boundary-value problems with parameter in Sobolev spaces . Ukrain. Math. J. 2019, 70 (11), 1677–1687. doi:10.1007/s11253-019-01599-7

    doi:10.1007/s11253-019-01599-7 2019

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    Generalized inverse operators and Fr edholm boundary- value problems

    Boichuk A.A., Samoilenko A.M. Generalized inverse operators and Fr edholm boundary- value problems. VSP, Utrecht-Boston, 2004

    2004

  2. [9]

    The theory of matrices

    Gantmacher F.R. The theory of matrices. Chelsea Publishing Comp any, New York, 1959

    1959

  3. [10]

    Fredholm boundary-value problems with pa- rameter in Sobolev spaces

    Gnyp E.V., Kodlyuk T.I., Mikhailets V.A. Fredholm boundary-value problems with pa- rameter in Sobolev spaces . Ukrain. Math. J. 2015, 67 (5), 658–667. doi:10.1007/s11253- 015-1105-1

    2015 doi

  4. [11]

    Formally self-ajoint quasi-differential operators and boundary-value problems

    Goriunov A.S., Mikhailets V.A., Pankrashkin K. Formally self-ajoint quasi-differential operators and boundary-value problems . Electr. J. Differ. Equa. 2013, 2013, 1–16

    2013

  5. [12]

    Regularization of singular Sturm–Liouville equations

    Goriunov A.S., Mikhailets V.A. Regularization of singular Sturm–Liouville equations . Methods Funct. Anal. Topology. 2010, 16 (2), 120–130

    2010

  6. [13]

    Regularization of two-term differential equations with singular coefficients by quasiderivatives

    Goriunov A.S., Mikhailets V.A. Regularization of two-term differential equations with singular coefficients by quasiderivatives . Ukrain. Math. J. 2012, 63 (9), 1361–1378. doi:10.1007/s11253-012-0584-6

    2012 doi

  7. [14]

    Resolvent convergence of Sturm—Liouville operators with singular potentials

    Goriunov A.S., Mikhailets V.A. Resolvent convergence of Sturm—Liouville operators with singular potentials. Math. Notes. 2010, 87 (1), 287–292. doi:10.1134/S0001434610010372

    2010 doi

  8. [15]

    Continuity in a parameter of solutions of nonclassical mult ipoint boundary-value problems on Sobolev spaces

    Hnyp Ye.V., Kodliuk T.I. Continuity in a parameter of solutions of nonclassical mult ipoint boundary-value problems on Sobolev spaces . Differential equations and related issues of analysis: Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics of the NAS o f Ukraine 2015,12 (2), 101–112...

    2015

  9. [16]

    Continuity of the solutions of one-dimensional boundary-v alue problems with respect to the parameter in the Slobodetskii spaces

    Hnyp E.V. Continuity of the solutions of one-dimensional boundary-v alue problems with respect to the parameter in the Slobodetskii spaces. Ukrain. Math. J. 2016, 68 (6), 849–861. doi:10.1007/s11253-016-1261-y

    2016 doi

  10. [17]

    Parameter-dependent one-dimensional boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces

    Hnyp Y.V., Mikhailets V.A., Murach A.A. Parameter-dependent one-dimensional boundary-value problems in Sobolev spaces . Electr. J. Differ. Equa. 2017, 2017 (81), 1–13

    2017

  11. [18]

    The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    H¨ ormander L. The analysis of linear partial differential operators. III: Pseudo-differential operators. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007

    2007

  12. [19]

    Theory of extremal problems

    Ioffe A.D., Tihomirov V.M. Theory of extremal problems. VEB Deut scher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1979

    1979

  13. [20]

    Boundary-value problems for systems of ordinary differenti al equations

    Kiguradze I.T. Boundary-value problems for systems of ordinary differenti al equations. J. Soviet Math. 1988, 43 (2), 2259–2339. doi:10.1007/BF01100360 15

    1988 doi

  14. [21]

    Some singular boundary-value problems for ordinary differential equations

    Kiguradze I.T. Some singular boundary-value problems for ordinary differential equations. Tbilisi University, Tbilisi, 1975. (in Russian)

    1975

  15. [22]

    Theory and applications of f ractional differ- ential equations

    Kilbas A.A., Srivastava H.M., Trujillo J.J. Theory and applications of f ractional differ- ential equations. North-Holland Mathematical Studies, Amsterda m, 2006

    2006

  16. [23]

    Limit transition in the class of multipoint boundary-value problems

    Kodliuk T.I. Limit transition in the class of multipoint boundary-value problems. Analysis and application: Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics of the NAS of Ukraine 2012, 9 (2), 203–216. (in Russian)

    2012

  17. [24]

    Multipoint boundary-value problems with a parameter in Sobolev spaces

    Kodliuk T.I., Mikhailets V.A. Multipoint boundary-value problems with a parameter in Sobolev spaces. Dopov. Nats. Acad. Nauk Ukr. 2012, (11), 15–19. (in Russian)

    2012

  18. [25]

    Kodlyuk T.I., Mikhailets V.A., Reva N.V., Limit theorems for one-dimensional boundary- value problems. Ukrain. Math. J. 2013, 65 (1), 77–90. doi:10.1007/s11253-013-0766-x

    2013 doi

  19. [26]

    Solutions of one-dimensional boundary-value problems wit h a parameter in Sobolev spaces

    Kodlyuk T.I., Mikhailets V.A. Solutions of one-dimensional boundary-value problems wit h a parameter in Sobolev spaces . J. Math. Sci. 2013, 190 (4), 589–599. doi:10.1007/s10958- 013-1272-2

    2013 doi

  20. [27]

    On the solution of some boundary-contact problems of linear hydrody- namics

    Krasil’nikov V.N. On the solution of some boundary-contact problems of linear hydrody- namics. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 1961, 25 (4), 1134–1141

    1961

  21. [28]

    Linear second order elliptic equations with Venttsel bound ary conditions

    Luo Y., Trudinger N.S. Linear second order elliptic equations with Venttsel bound ary conditions. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect A 1991, 118 (3–4), 193–207

    1991

  22. [29]

    Continuity in the parameter for the solutions of one- dimensional boundary-value problems for differential syst ems of higher orders in Slobodet- skii spaces

    Masliuk H.O., Mikhailets V.A. Continuity in the parameter for the solutions of one- dimensional boundary-value problems for differential syst ems of higher orders in Slobodet- skii spaces. Ukrain. Math. J. 2018, 70 (3), 467–476. doi:10.1007/s11253-018-1510-3

    2018 doi

  23. [30]

    On the solvability of Fredholm boundary-value problems in fractional Sobolev spaces

    Mikhailets V.A., Atlasiuk O.M., Skorobohach T.B. On the solvability of Fredholm boundary-value problems in fractional Sobolev spaces . Ukrain. Math. J. 2023, 75 (1), 107–117. doi:10.1007/s11253-023-02188-5

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Limit theorems for general one-dimensional boundary- value problems

    Mikhailets V.A., Chekhanova G.A. Limit theorems for general one-dimensional boundary- value problems. J. Math. Sci. 2015, 204 (3), 333–342. doi:10.1007/s10958-014-2205-4

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Continuity in a parameter of solutions to generic boundary-value problems

    Mikhailets V.A., Murach A.A., Soldatov V.O. Continuity in a parameter of solutions to generic boundary-value problems . Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2016, 2016 (A87), 1–16. doi:10.14232/ejqtde.2016.1.87

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    Limit theorems for the solutions of boundary- value problems

    Mikhailets V.A., Pelekhata O.B., Reva N.V. Limit theorems for the solutions of boundary- value problems. Ukrain. Math. J. 2018, 70 (2), 243–251. doi:10.1007/s11253-018-1498-8

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    Fredholm boundary-value problem in Sobolev–Slobodetsky spaces

    Mikhailets V.A., Skorobohach T.B. Fredholm boundary-value problem in Sobolev–Slobodetsky spaces . Ukrain. Math. J. 2021, 73 (7), 1071–1083. doi:10.1007/s11253-021-01977-0

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    On Boundary Conditions for Multidimensional Diffusion Proc esses

    Venttsel A.D. On Boundary Conditions for Multidimensional Diffusion Proc esses. Theory of Probability and Its Application 1959, 4, 172–185. (in Russian) 16 Mikhailets V.A.: Institute of Mathematics of the National Academy of Sciences of U kraine, st. Tereschenkivska 3, 01024 Ky...

    1959

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.