Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Stochastic Volterra Equations for Local Times of Spectrally Positive L\'evy Processes with Gaussian Components

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Local-time profiles obey one explicit Volterra equation

desk verdict Likely-correct SVE representation for local times of spectrally positive Lévy processes with Gaussian component, but the limit characterization in §4.4.3 skips the domination condition in Lemma 4.36 and a referee must check it. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15485 v2 pith:SIFCIDON submitted 2024-11-23 math.PR

Wei Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60G5160J5560H2060G2260F1760G55
keywords localtimeLévyprocessspectrallypositivestochasticVolterraequationRay-KnighttheoremcomparisonprincipleLaplacefunctionalscalefunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the spatial profile of local times of a spectrally positive Lévy process with a Gaussian component—stopped when the local time at zero first exceeds a level $\zeta$ and conditioned on that time being finite—is, in law, the unique non-negative continuous solution of an explicit stochastic Volterra equation. The equation is driven by a Gaussian white noise and two independent Poisson measures, with a convolution kernel built from the scale function of the process. From this single representation the paper derives a comparison principle for local times under different drifts or stopping levels, uniform moment bounds, $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-Hölder regularity with all moments of the Hölder coefficient, and an exponential-affine formula for the Laplace functional in terms of a path-dependent nonlinear Volterra equation. If correct, the spatial dynamics of local times for this entire Lévy class are reduced to one equation, and the flow picture suggested by the comparison principle connects the local-time field to branching-type stochastic flows.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the stochastic Volterra equation (1.8) together with its data: the scale function $W$ of the spectrally positive Lévy process, defined by $W(x)=0$ for $x<0$ and $\int_0^\infty e^{-\lambda x}W(x)\,dx = 1/\Phi(\lambda)$ for $\lambda>0$, and three mutually independent driving noises—a Poisson random measure $N_0$ with intensity $\bar\nu(y)\,dz\,dy$ on $(0,\infty)^2$, a Gaussian white noise $B_c$ with intensity $2c\,ds\,dz$, and a compensated Poisson random measure $\widetilde N_\nu$ with intensity $ds\,dz\,\nu(dy)$. The four terms of the equation encode, respectively, the average contribution of positive excursions, the randomness of overshoots of jump excursions, the Brownian diffusion part, and the compensated jump part of the local-time profile. The proof machinery is a weak-convergence argument: the Lévy process is approximated by rescaled compound Poisson processes whose jump laws mix an exponential law with a tail-tilted copy of the Lévy measure, their local times are written as Volterra equations, and the rescaled equations are shown to converge to (1.8); the resolvent identity for the renewal equation (3.3) provides the asymptotic link between the compound-Poisson resolvent and the scale function.

What would settle it

Compute the Laplace functional (1.22) for a drifted Brownian motion ($\nu = 0$, $c > 0$, $b \ge 0$) and compare it with the classical Laplace transform of the squared Bessel / Feller diffusion that Remark 1.2 identifies as the solution of the equation; a mismatch for any measure $\mu$ would disprove the representation. Alternatively, the paper states that the equivalence between its Laplace-functional formula and the excursion-theoretic representation in [63] remains open; evaluating both sides numerically for a spectrally positive process with Gaussian component and a nontrivial jump measure on a specific test measure $\mu$ would settle whether the two formulas agree.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for each $\zeta \ge 0$, the process $L^\xi_\zeta(x) = L^\xi(x, \tau^L_\xi(\zeta))$, $x \ge 0$, conditioned on $\tau^L_\xi(\zeta) < \infty$, has the same distribution as the unique continuous non-negative solution of the stochastic Volterra equation $$X_\zeta(t) = \zeta\, c\, W'(t) + \int_0^\zeta\int_0^\infty \big(W(t)-W(t-y)\big) N_0(dz,dy) + \int_0^t\$int_0^{{X_\zeta(s)}}$ W'(t-s)\, B_c(ds,dz) + \int_0^t\$int_0^{{X_\zeta(s)}}$\int_0^\infty \big(W(t-s)-W(t-s-y)\big) \widetilde N_\nu(ds,dz,dy),$$ where $W$ is the scale function (Laplace transform $1/\Phi$), $N_0$ has intensity $\bar\nu(y)\,dz\,dy$, $B_c$ has intensity $2c\,ds\,dz$, and $\widetilde N_\nu$ is compensated with intensity $ds\,dz\,\nu(dy)$. The paper proves this by rescaling compound Poisson processes with carefully chosen jump laws, passing to the limit in the Volterra equations for their local times, and then reading off the limit equation. Uniqueness in law is obtained as a corollary of the Laplace-functional representation.

Load-bearing premise

The representation stands only if the approximating compound Poisson processes converge to the target Lévy process in the correct distributional sense—the argument needs both convergence of their Laplace exponents and finite-dimensional convergence of their local times—and the separate strong-uniqueness claim additionally assumes the jump measure has finite mean.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Local times in the spatial direction for every spectrally positive Lévy process with a Gaussian component are governed by one explicit stochastic Volterra equation, so path properties and distributional identities can in principle be derived from the equation rather than from excursion theory.
  • The comparison principle (Theorem 1.5) puts the local-time profiles of processes with different drifts or different stopping levels on a common probability space with a pointwise ordering, which yields a stochastic flow with the branching property.
  • The SVE gives uniform moment bounds in the level variable (Theorem 1.8) and local $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-Hölder continuity of the spatial profile with all moments of the Hölder coefficient bounded (Theorem 1.9).
  • The Laplace functional of the local-time profile has the exponential-affine form $\exp\{-\zeta\, F\circ V_\mu(x)\}$ where $V_\mu$ solves the nonlinear Volterra equation (1.20); in the subcritical case, the total local-time profile $L^\xi_\infty$ is the solution with an exponentially distributed $\zeta$ (Corollary 1.11).
  • Under the extra integrability condition $\bar{\bar\nu}(0+) < \infty$, the SVE has a unique strong solution, which is a semimartingale with an explicit decomposition (Theorem 1.7).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the representation extends to the whole real line, the SVE approach would give a unified analytic handle on reflected and non-reflected local-time fields, which the paper only treats on the positive half-line.
  • The paper leaves open the equivalence of its Laplace-functional formula with the excursion-theoretic formula of [63]; proving that equivalence would tie the Volterra kernel directly to excursion measures and likely simplify the comparison principle.
  • The comparison principle suggests a pathwise construction of the stochastic flow of local times as a flow of SVE solutions, but the paper does not construct such a flow; that would be the natural next step.
  • A direct check of the Brownian case ($\nu = 0$) recovers the classical Feller diffusion via Remark 1.2, so the SVE framework can be calibrated against known results for squared Bessel processes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper treats a spectrally positive Lévy process ξ with Gaussian component and Laplace exponent (1.1). For ζ≥0, it studies the local-time profile L^ξ_ζ(x)=L^ξ(x,τ^L_ξ(ζ)) conditioned on τ^L_ξ(ζ)<∞. Theorem 1.1 asserts that this profile is equal in law to the unique nonnegative continuous solution of the stochastic Volterra equation (1.8), driven by a Gaussian white noise and two Poisson random measures whose kernel is built from the scale function W. The proof approximates ξ by rescaled compound Poisson processes, establishes C-tightness of the resulting equations, and identifies the limit via Lemmas 4.35–4.36. From (1.8) the paper derives a comparison principle (Theorem 1.5), strong existence and uniqueness under an additional finite-mean-type assumption (Theorem 1.7), uniform moment bounds, Hölder regularity and a maximal inequality (Theorems 1.8–1.9), and an exponential-affine Laplace functional representation (Theorem 1.10).

Significance. If the proof is completed, this would be a substantial extension of the author's earlier stable-process result and would provide a single stochastic Volterra description for local-time profiles of the whole Gaussian-component class, with several nontrivial consequences: pathwise comparison, moment and Hölder estimates, and a Laplace-functional formula. The paper is unusually detailed and contains many explicit estimates, equivalent representations, and standalone lemmas, and it transparently identifies the results imported from the author's previous work [68]. The main risks are concentrated in the compound-Poisson approximation step and in the identification of the jump term in the limit; both are discussed below.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.2)] Equation (4.2) claims that the probability law Λ_n has finite mean as a consequence of (1.2), but this is not true in general. Indeed, ∥Λ_n∥_{L^1} = (n/\barν(η_n)) ∫_0^∞ \barν(η_n+y)dy = (n/\barν(η_n)) ∫_{η_n}^∞ \barν(z)dz, and the last integral equals ∫_0^∞ (z−η_n)_+ ν(dz), which is infinite whenever ∫_0^∞ z ν(dz)=∞. The condition (1.2) allows infinite mean, e.g. ν(dy)∼y^{-2}dy near 0. Consequently the jump law Π_n in (4.5) need not have finite mean, the quantity ∥Π_n∥_{L^1} in (4.7) is not finite, the arrival rate γ_n in (4.4) does not produce a finite-mean compound Poisson process, and Lemma 3.1 cannot be applied. This affects all of Sections 4.2–4.4 for spectra with infinite mean, so the proof of Theorem 1.1 as written covers only finite-mean ν. The manuscript should either restrict the main statement to ∫_0^∞ y ν(dy)<∞ or replace the compound-Poisson approximation by a finite-mean truncation that is then removed in a separate limiting argument.
  2. [§4.4.3, Eq. (4.105)] The identification of I^{(n)}_4 as the compensated Poisson integral in (1.8) invokes Lemma 4.36 without verifying its domination hypothesis (4.98). The manuscript checks the vague convergence of the intensities n^3 γ_n θ_n (e_c*dΛ_n)(n·dy) to ν(dy), but Lemma 4.36 also requires a σ-finite measure m such that sup_n ∫ f(y) μ_n(n·dy) ≤ ∫ f(y) m(dy) for every nonnegative measurable f and sup_t ∫ |G(t,y)|² m(dy)<∞. No such m is exhibited. In the infinite-activity case the total mass of μ_n(n·dy) is unbounded as n→∞, so domination is not automatic, and vague convergence alone does not yield the uniform tightness of the infinite-dimensional semimartingales used in the proof of the lemma. This is load-bearing because the I_4 limit is one of the three noises in (1.8). The gap is local and probably repairable, but the authors must either construct m satisfying both conditions in (4.98) or replace Lemma 4.36 by a different tightness argument that only uses the available moment and convergence information.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Remark 1.3, Eq. (1.13)] In (1.13) the first term on the right is written ζ(1−bW(x)), but the variable should be t; the same display otherwise uses t throughout.
  2. [§7, Proposition 7.2] The proof cites the bound sup_t W_β(t) ≤ (β+b)^{-1}, but for β>0 the correct scale-function bound from (1.7) applied to W_β is sup_t W_β(t)=1/β. Since the constants in the proposition may depend on β, this does not change the qualitative conclusion, but the displayed inequality should be corrected.
  3. [§4.4.4, Lemma 4.37] Lemma 4.37 is the only ingredient that produces the pathwise ordering of the approximating processes in the proof of Theorem 1.5, yet its proof is omitted as 'elementary'. The authors should include a short proof or a precise reference, since the comparison principle depends on it.
  4. [Throughout] There are a few typographical slips: 'lake of negative jumps' should be 'lack of negative jumps', and 'limited acknowledge of excursion theory' should be 'limited knowledge of excursion theory'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central SVE representation is derived by weak convergence from compound-Poisson local times, and the only self-citation is to published auxiliary results.

full rationale

Theorem 1.1 is not obtained by assuming its conclusion: the proof starts from the compound-Poisson representations of Lemmas 3.1-3.2, scales the processes (Section 3.3), proves Φ^(n)→Φ (Proposition 4.2), establishes C-tightness of the four integral terms (Section 4.3), and only then characterizes the limit as the solution of (1.8) (Section 4.4.3). The target Gaussian-component Lévy local-time law enters only through the limit of the approximating compound-Poisson local times (Lemma 3.4, quoted from Lambert-Simatos [49]), not as an input to the equation. Lemmas 3.1-3.2 and the stochastic-Fubini/moment tools are imported from the author's published [68], but they concern compound-Poisson Hawkes-type equations and are parameter-free with stated assumptions; they do not assume the Gaussian-component result. The reviewer's objection about Lemma 4.36 concerns the unverified domination condition (4.98) in the identification of the jump term I_4; that is a correctness/rigor gap, not a circularity, because a failed domination would invalidate the proof rather than make the theorem true by definition. No parameter is fitted and no prediction is renamed. The minor self-citation is transparent and non-load-bearing, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All inputs beyond the given Levy triplet (b,c,ν) are standard objects (scale function, white noise, Poisson measures) or published results (local-time existence, compound Poisson SVE). The only substantive extra condition is the finite-mean-jump hypothesis ¯¯ν(0+) < ∞ needed for strong uniqueness, which is stated as an assumption rather than derived. No adversarial or ad hoc to this paper axioms were identified.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local times of ξ exist as square-integrable occupation densities and are jointly continuous thanks to the Gaussian component c > 0
    Invoked at the start of Section 1.1 via Theorem 1 in [14, p.126] and Lemma 2.2 in [49]; every SVE statement operates on this density.
  • standard math The scale function W is non-negative, continuous, increasing, identically zero on (-∞,0), with Laplace transform 1/Φ and W' ≤ 1/c (eqs. (1.6)-(1.7))
    Standard fluctuation theory of spectrally negative Levy processes, cited to [18,46,47]; Corollary 4.6 derives the bound W' ≤ 1/c inside the paper.
  • standard math The three driving noises N0, Bc, Ñν exist as independent Poisson random measure, Gaussian white noise, and compensated Poisson random measure with the stated intensities
    Standard extension-of-probability-space construction; the SVE (1.8) is defined with respect to these noises.
  • domain assumption Local times of compound Poisson processes satisfy the SVEs of Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 (Hawkes representation and resolvent form)
    Taken from the author's published prior work [68]; this is the starting point for the approximation proof of Theorem 1.1.
  • domain assumption Finite mean jump size, ¯¯ν(0+) < ∞, for the strong existence and uniqueness statement
    Explicit additional hypothesis in Theorem 1.7, used to make W'' continuous so that (1.17) is a classical semimartingale equation for which pathwise uniqueness holds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic Volterra Equations for Local Times of Spectrally Positive L\'evy Processes with Gaussian Components." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SIFCIDON

@misc{pith2026241115485,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic Volterra Equations for Local Times of Spectrally Positive L\'evy Processes with Gaussian Components},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SIFCIDON}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15485}
}
abstract

Following our previous work [68], this paper continues to investigate the evolution dynamics of local times of spectrally positive L\'evy processes with Gaussian components in the spatial direction. We prove that conditioned on the finiteness of the first time at which the local time at zero exceeds a given value, local times at positive line are equal in law to the unique solution of a stochastic Volterra equation driven by a Gaussian white noise and two Poisson random measures with convolution kernel given in terms of the scale function. Also, we obtain several equivalent stochastic equations by using the potential theoretic techniques and prove the strong existence and uniqueness by using the generalized Yamada-Watanabe theorems. Armed with the stochastic Volterra representation, we then establish a comparison principle for the local times of spectrally positive L\'evy processes with various drifts or stopped when local times at zero exceed different given values, which proposes a stochastic flow enjoying the branching property. And also, we explore some novel properties of local times in the spatial direction including uniform moment estimates, $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-H\"older continuity and maximal inequality. By using the method of duality, we provide an exponential-affine representation of the Laplace functional in terms of the unique non-negative solution of a path-dependent nonlinear Volterra equation associated with the Laplace exponent of L\'evy process. This gives another perspective on the evolution dynamics of local times in the spatial direction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15485 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. A sample path of spectrally positive L´evy processes containing three typical kinds of excursions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Limit Theorems for Multivariate Hawkes Processes and Stochastic Volterra Equations with Measure Kernel

    math.PR 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Asymptotically critical multivariate Hawkes processes converge to the unique weak solution of a stochastic Volterra equation with a measure kernel, characterized by an admissible pair (K, Φ).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [68]

    W. Xu. Stochastic Volterra equations for the local times of spectrally positive stable processes. Ann. Appl. Probab., 34(3):2733–2798, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    A ¨ ıd´ ekon, Y

    E. A ¨ ıd´ ekon, Y. Hu, and Z. Shi. An infinite-dimensional representation of the Ray-Knight theorems. Sci. China Math. , 67(1):149–162, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    A ¨ ıd´ ekon, Y

    E. A ¨ ıd´ ekon, Y. Hu, and Z. Shi. The stochastic Jacobi flow. To appear inAnn. Probab., 2024+

    work page 2024

  4. [3]

    D. Aldous. Stopping times and tightness. Ann. Probab., 6(2):335–340, 1978

    work page 1978

  5. [4]

    D. Aldous. The continuum random tree. I. Ann. Probab., 19(1):1–28, 1991

    work page 1991

  6. [5]

    D. Aldous. The continuum random tree III. Ann. Probab., 21(1):248–289, 1993

    work page 1993

  7. [6]

    Alfonsi and G

    A. Alfonsi and G. Szulda. On non-negative solutions of stochastic Volterra equations with jumps and non-Lipschitz coefficients. arXiv:2402.19203, 2024. 82

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Bacry, S

    E. Bacry, S. Delattre, M. Hoffmann, and J. F. Muzy. Some limit theorems for Hawkes processes and application to financial statistics. Stoch. Process. Appl., 123(7):2475–2499, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 70 references
  1. [8]

    M. T. Barlow. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the continuity of local time of L´ evy processes. Ann. Probab., 16(4):1389–1427, 1988

    1988

  2. [9]

    M. T. Barlow and J. Hawkes. Application de l’entropie m´ etrique ` a la continuit´ e des temps locaux des processus de L´ evy.CR Acad. Sci. Paris , 301:237–239, 1985

    1985

  3. [10]

    Barndorff-Nielsen, O

    Mikosch T. Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and S. I. Resnick. L´ evy Processes: Theory and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

    2001

  4. [11]

    Bass and D

    R. Bass and D. Khoshnevisan. Stochastic calculus and the continuity of local times of l´ evy processes. In S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XXVI(pp. 1-10). Springer, Berlin, 2006

    2006

  5. [12]

    Behme, D

    A. Behme, D. Oechsler, and R. Schilling. On q-scale functions of spectrally negative L´ evy processes. Adv. Appl. Probab., 55(1):56–84, 2022

    2022

  6. [13]

    J. Bertoin. On the hilbert transform of the local times of a L´ evy process. Bulletin des sciences math´ ematiques, 119(2):147–156, 1995

    1995

  7. [14]

    J. Bertoin. L´ evy Processes. Cambridge University Press, 1996

    1996

  8. [15]

    E. S. Boylan. Local times for a class of Markoff processes. Illinois J. Math. , 8(1):19–39, 1964

    1964

  9. [16]

    H. Brunner. Collocation Methods for Volterra Integral and Related Functional Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  10. [17]

    Canadas and M

    O. Canadas and M. Friesen. Comparison principles for stochastic Volterra equations. arXiv:2403.15801, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    T. Chan, A. E. Kyprianou, and M. Savov. Smoothness of scale functions for spectrally negative L´ evy processes. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 150:691–708, 2011

    2011

  12. [19]

    Contreras and W

    J. Contreras and W. Xu. Stochastic branching flows in the local times of spectrally positive L´ evy processes. in Preparation, 2024

    2024

  13. [20]

    D. A. Dawson and Z. Li. Stochastic equations, flows and measure-valued processes. Ann. Probab., 40(2):813–857, 2012

    2012

  14. [21]

    Duquesne

    T. Duquesne. The coding of compact real trees by real valued functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:0604106, 2006

    2006

  15. [22]

    Duquesne and J.-F

    T. Duquesne and J.-F. Le Gall. Random Trees, L´ evy Processes and Spatial Branching Processesvol

  16. [23]

    E. B. Dynkin. Gaussian and non-Gaussian random fields associated with Markov processes. J. Funct. Anal., 55(3):344–376, 1984

    1984

  17. [24]

    Eisenbaum

    N. Eisenbaum. Dynkin’s isomorphism theorem and the Ray-Knight theorems. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 99(2):321–335, 1994

    1994

  18. [25]

    Eisenbaum

    N. Eisenbaum. Une version sans conditionnement du th´ eor` eme d’isomorphisme de Dynkin. In S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XXIX,volume 1613 of Lecture Notes Math (pp. 266-289). Springer Berlin , 1995. 83

    1995

  19. [26]

    Eisenbaum and H

    N. Eisenbaum and H. Kaspi. A necessary and sufficient condition for the Markov property of the local time process. Ann. Probab., 21(3):1591–1598, 1993

    1993

  20. [27]

    Eisenbaum, H

    N. Eisenbaum, H. Kaspi, M. B. Marcus, J. Rosen, and Z. Shi. A Ray-Knight theorem for symmetric Markov processes. Ann. Probab., 28(4):1781–1796, 2000

    2000

  21. [28]

    El Karoui and S

    N. El Karoui and S. M´ el´ eard. Martingale measures and stochastic calculus.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 84:83–101, 1990

    1990

  22. [29]

    Ferreyra and P

    G. Ferreyra and P. Sundar. Comparison of stochastic Volterra equations. Bernoulli, 6(6):1001–1006, 2000

    2000

  23. [30]

    P. J. Fitzsimmons and R. K. Getoor. Limit theorems and variation properties for fractional derivatives of the local time of a stable process. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 28(2):311–333, 1992

    1992

  24. [31]

    P. J. Fitzsimmons and S. C. Port. Local times, occupation times, and the Lebesgue measure of the range of a L´ evy process.Seminar on Stochastic Processes , pages pp.59–73, 1989

    1989

  25. [32]

    P. J. Fitzsimmons and J. Rosen. Markovian loop soups: permanental processes and isomorphism theorems. Electron. J. Probab., 60:1–30, 2014

    2014

  26. [33]

    Forman, S

    N. Forman, S. Pal, D. Rizzolo, and M. Winkel. Uniform control of local times of spectrally positive stable processes. Ann. Appl. Probab., 28(4):2592–2634, 2018

    2018

  27. [34]

    A. M. Garsia, E. Rodemich, H. Rumsey, and M. Rosenblatt. A real variable lemma and the continuity of paths of some Gaussian processes. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 20(6):565–578, 1970

    1970

  28. [35]

    Gripenberg, S

    G. Gripenberg, S. O. Londen, and O. Staffans. Volterra Integral and Functional Equations . Cam- bridge University Press, 1990

    1990

  29. [36]

    P. Hartman. Ordinary Differential Equations. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2002

    2002

  30. [37]

    Horst and W

    U. Horst and W. Xu. Functional limit theorems for Hawkes processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11495, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Horst, W

    U. Horst, W. Xu, and R. Zhang. Convergence of heavy-tailed Hawkes processes and the microstruc- ture of rough volatility. arXiv: 2312.08784 , 2023

    2023

  32. [39]

    Ikeda and S

    N. Ikeda and S. Watanabe. Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes . North- Holland/Kodansha, Amsterdam/Tokyo, 1989

    1989

  33. [40]

    Jacod and A

    J. Jacod and A. N. Shiryaev. Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes . Springer, Berlin, 2003

    2003

  34. [41]

    V. V. Kalashnikov. Geometric Sums: Bounds for Rare Events with Applications: Risk Analysis, Reliability, Queueing . Springer Science & Business Media, 1997

    1997

  35. [42]

    Karatzas and S

    I. Karatzas and S. Shreve. Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus . Springer, 1988

    1988

  36. [43]

    F. B. Knight. Random walks and a sojourn density process of brownian motion. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 109(1):56–86, 1963

    1963

  37. [44]

    T. G. Kurtz. Weak and strong solutions of general stochastic models. Electron. Commun. Probab., 19(58):1–16, 2014

    2014

  38. [45]

    G Kurtz and P

    T. G Kurtz and P. E. Protter. Weak convergence of stochastic integrals and differential equations. II. Infinite-dimensional case. In Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 1627:197–285, 1996. 84

    1996

  39. [46]

    Kuznetsov, A

    A. Kuznetsov, A. E. Kyprianou, and V. Rivero. The Theory of Scale Functions for Spectrally Negative L´ evy Processes, pages 97–186. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013

    2013

  40. [47]

    A. E. Kyprianou. Fluctuations of L´ evy Processes with Applications: Introductory Lectures. Springer Science & Business Media, 2014

    2014

  41. [48]

    A. Lambert. The contour of splitting trees is a L´ evy process. Ann. Probab., 38(1):348–395, 2010

    2010

  42. [49]

    Lambert and F

    A. Lambert and F. Simatos. Asymptotic behavior of local times of compound Poisson processes with drift in the infinite variance case. J. Theoret. Probab., 28(1):41–91, 2015

    2015

  43. [50]

    Lambert and G

    A. Lambert and G. Uribe Bravo. Totally ordered measured trees and splitting trees with infinite variation. Electron. J. Probab., 120(23):1–41, 2018

    2018

  44. [51]

    J. F. Le Gall and Y. Le Jan. Branching processes in l´ evy processes: Laplace functionals of snakes and superprocesses. Ann. Probab., 26(4):1407–1432, 1998

    1998

  45. [52]

    J. F. Le Gall and Y. Le Jan. Branching processes in l´ evy processes: the exploration process. Ann. Probab., 26(2):213–252, 1998

    1998

  46. [53]

    Le Jan, M

    Y. Le Jan, M. B. Marcus, and J. Rosen. Permanental fields, loop soups and continuous additive functionals. Ann. Probab., 43(1):44–84, 2015

    2015

  47. [54]

    Le Jan, M

    Y. Le Jan, M. B. Marcus, and J. Rosen. Intersection Local Times, Loop Soups and Permanental Wick Powers. (Vol. 247, No. 1171). American Mathematical Society, 2017

    2017

  48. [55]

    Ledoux and M

    M. Ledoux and M. Talagrand. Probability in Banach Spaces: isoperimetry and processes . North- Holland/Kodansha, Amsterdam/Tokyo, 1991

    1991

  49. [56]

    L´ epingle and J

    D. L´ epingle and J. M´ emin. Sur l ´ ınt´ egrabilit´ e uniforme des martingales exponentielles.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 42:175–203., 1978

    1978

  50. [57]

    M. B. Marcus and J. Rosen. Moduli of continuity of local times of strongly symmetric Markov processes via Gaussian processes. J. Theor. Probab., 5:791–825, 1992

    1992

  51. [58]

    M. B. Marcus and J. Rosen. Moment generating functions for the local times of symmetric Markov processes and random walks. In Probability in Banach Spaces 8, Proceedings of the Eighth Inter- national Conference, Progress in Probability series, volume 30 (pp. 364–376). Boston: ...

    1992

  52. [59]

    M. B. Marcus and J. Rosen. Markov Processes Processes, Gaussian Processes and Local Times . Springer, New York., 2006

    2006

  53. [60]

    Pr¨ omel and D

    D.J. Pr¨ omel and D. Scheffels. Stochastic Volterra equations with h¨ older diffusion coefficients.Stoch. Process. Appl., 161(2):291–315, 2023

    2023

  54. [61]

    D. Ray. Sojourn times of diffusion processes. Illinois J. Math. , 7(4):615–630, 1963

    1963

  55. [62]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor. Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion , volume 293. Springer Science & Business Media., 2005

    2005

  56. [63]

    Rivero and J

    V. Rivero and J. Contreras. Ray Knight theorems for spectrally negative L´ evy processes. Electron. J. Probab., 29:1–39, 2024

    2024

  57. [64]

    Sabot and P

    C. Sabot and P. Tarres. Inverting ray-knight identity. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 165(3):559–580, 2016. 85

    2016

  58. [65]

    R. Situ. Theory of Stochastic Differential Equations with Jumps and Applications: Mathematical and Analytical Techniques with Applications to Engineering . New York, Springer, 2005

    2005

  59. [66]

    C. Tudor. A comparison theorem for stochastic equations with Tolterra drifts. Ann. Probab. , 17(4):1541–1545, 1989

    1989

  60. [67]

    J. B. Walsh. An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations. In ´Ecole d’ ´Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint Flour XIV-1984 , pages 265–439, 1986

    1984

  61. [69]

    Yamada and S

    T. Yamada and S. Watanabe. On the uniqueness of solutions of stochastic differential equations. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. , 11(1):155–167, 1971. 86

    1971

  62. [281]

    Soci´ et´ e math´ ematique de France, Paris, 2002

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.