Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Multi-soliton solutions of Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Theorem 1.3 of this paper establishes that, for any prescribed sum of N solitary waves of the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system with distinct speeds, there is a genuine solution converging to that sum in the energy space at the exponential…

desk verdict First multi-soliton theorem for KGZ, solid construction, but Theorem 1.3 overclaims by dropping the distinct-speed hypothesis the proof needs. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15487 v1 pith:T4JGVTLA submitted 2024-11-23 math.AP

Vicente Alvarez , Amin Esfahani This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35L5135C0735B40
keywords Klein-Gordon-Zakharovsystemmulti-solitonasymptoticbehaviorenergyspacemodulationlocalizationcoercivitybootstrap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves the existence of multi-soliton solutions for the one-dimensional Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system, the two-component Hamiltonian model of Langmuir turbulence in plasma. Given N solitary waves with explicit sech-type profiles and pairwise distinct propagation speeds, it shows that some solution of the system is defined for all large times and stays exponentially close to the sum of those waves in the energy space. The significance is that multi-solitons are the natural asymptotic building blocks of non-integrable dispersive systems, and their construction here extends the known Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon techniques to a coupled system with two different wave operators. The proof also shows that the troublesome eigenfunction directions of the linearized coercivity operator can be eliminated by orthogonality conditions produced by localization and modulation.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the localized energy-momentum functional $S(t,\vec u)=\sum_{j=1}^N S_{j,\mathrm{loc}}(\vec u)$, built from the conserved energy $E$ and the momentum functionals $Q_1,Q_2$ with time-dependent cut-offs $\varphi_j$ that isolate each soliton's moving centre. Around the modulated sum $\vec{\tilde R}$, the linearized operators $H_j=S_j''(\vec R_j)$ are coercive under the orthogonality conditions $\langle \vec\varepsilon,\partial_x\vec{\tilde D}\rangle=\langle \vec\varepsilon,\vec{\tilde\Gamma}\rangle=\langle \vec\varepsilon,\vec{\tilde\Psi}\rangle=0$, which the modulation of the parameters $(\omega_j,x_j,\gamma_j)$ enforces. These pieces yield the key bounds $\langle H_{\mathrm{loc}}\vec\varepsilon,\vec\varepsilon\rangle \ge K\|\vec\varepsilon\|_X^2$ and $|\partial_t S|\le C\sqrt t\, e^{-2\omega_*^{1/2} c_* t}$, whose combination drives the bootstrap to the exponential estimate.

What would settle it

Take $N=2$ with $c_1=c_2$ and simulate the backward construction from large final times; if the $X$-distance to the two-soliton sum does not tend to zero, the convergence claim of Theorem 1.3 (which states no distinct-speed hypothesis) fails for coincident speeds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result, Theorem 1.3, asserts that if N solitons of the form (1.10) are chosen with parameters satisfying (1.9) and $\vec R$ is their sum, then there is a time $T_0$ and a solution $\vec u$ of the equivalent system (1.2) defined on $[T_0,\infty)$ such that $\|\vec u(t)-\vec R(t)\|_X \le e^{-\omega_*^{1/2} c_* t}$ for all $t$; in particular $\vec u(t)$ converges to $\vec R(t)$ in $X=H^1\times L^2\times L^2\times L^2$ as $t\to\infty$. The construction proceeds by fixing a sequence $T_n\to\infty$, solving backwards the final-value problem with data $\vec u_n(T_n)=\vec R(T_n)$, proving uniform exponential bounds on $[T_0,T_n]$ by a bootstrap argument on a localized energy functional, and then passing to the limit through the local well-posedness theory.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the soliton speeds are pairwise distinct ($c_1<c_2<\dots<c_N$), making the smallest speed gap $c_*$ strictly positive; if two speeds coincide, the exponential rate degenerates and the convergence argument collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $N\ge 2$ and every choice of distinct speeds and frequencies satisfying (1.9), the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system possesses a solution whose energy-space distance to the prescribed sum of solitons decays like $e^{-\omega_*^{1/2} c_* t}$.
  • The constructed solution is global in forward time: the uniform bound together with the blow-up alternative rules out finite-time blow-up before $t=+\infty$.
  • The proof removes the need to identify eigenfunctions of the coercivity operator, replacing that step with orthogonality conditions derived from localization and modulation, so the same outline is available for other Hamiltonian systems with similar structure.
  • The convergence rate is explicit in terms of the smallest spectral gap $\omega_*$ and the smallest speed gap $c_*$, so it degenerates only when two solitons travel at the same speed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The distinct-speed condition is load-bearing even though Theorem 1.3 states no such hypothesis; with $c_*=0$ the exponential rate collapses and the convergence assertion is no longer established, so a natural open question is whether same-speed multi-solitons exist.
  • A numerical study of the two-soliton interaction could test whether the rate $e^{-\omega_*^{1/2} c_* t}$ is sharp or merely an upper bound.
  • The localization-modulation-orthogonality scheme may transfer to coupled Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger or Zakharov-type systems whose second component is a linear wave equation, provided the same coercivity and conservation structure can be verified.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs multi-soliton solutions for the one-dimensional Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system (1.1)/(1.2). For a prescribed set of N explicit solitary-wave profiles (1.8)–(1.10) with parameters satisfying (1.9), the authors claim the existence of a solution that converges in the energy space X to the sum R(t) of the N solitons with the exponential rate exp(-ω_*^{1/2} c_* t) as t → +∞ (Theorem 1.3). The proof strategy is the standard backward-in-time construction: solve (1.2) with final data R(T_n), prove uniform estimates on [T0,T_n] by a bootstrap in Proposition 1.5, and pass to the limit n → ∞ in Section 4. The technical core is a modulation argument (Section 3) that imposes orthogonality conditions (3.5), a localized coercivity bound (Proposition 3.5), and smallness estimates for the time derivative of the localized action (Lemma 3.8).

Significance. If correct, the result would be a valuable extension of the multi-soliton existence theory to the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system, going beyond the known constructions for nonlinear Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon equations. The paper's approach has notable strengths: the soliton profiles are explicit and derived without fitting parameters, the construction starts from final data equal to the intended multi-soliton sum, and the claimed exponential convergence rate is sharp in form. The proof draws on well-established modulation and localization techniques, and the coercivity facts are quoted from external references. However, the current manuscript contains a load-bearing gap in the statement of the main theorem (the missing distinct-speed hypothesis) and an incomplete, partially self-referential compactness argument in Proposition 4.2, so the main claim is not yet established as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1, Theorem 1.3] The statement of Theorem 1.3 omits the hypothesis that the propagation speeds c_j are pairwise distinct, although the proof depends crucially on this assumption. In Section 3, immediately before Lemma 3.3, the authors state 'we assume, without loss of generality, that the propagation speeds of the solitons satisfy c_k ≠ c_m ... c_1 < c_2 < ... < c_N.' This is not without loss of generality: if two speeds coincide, then c_* = min_{j≠k} |c_j - c_k| = 0 by the definition in Theorem 1.3, and every exponential estimate in Lemmas 3.3, 3.7, and 3.8, as well as the bootstrap in Proposition 1.5, reduces to an O(1) bound. For example, the estimate (3.24) is e^{-(1/4)√I_k c_* t}, which is 1 when c_* = 0, so the interaction terms are no longer small. Condition (1.9) does not force distinct speeds. Thus the theorem as stated is not supported by the proof; the gap is repairable by adding the hypothesis c_1 < c_2 < ... < c_N to Theorem 1.3.
  2. [§4, Proposition 4.2] The proof of Proposition 4.2 is self-referential and incomplete. It first obtains a weak limit u_0 of u_n(T_0) in X, but then says 'Let ⃗ u0 be as obtained in Proposition 4.2' inside its own proof, which is circular. The displayed line 'since ֒→H^s_loc(R) × ˙H^{s-1}_loc(R), for s<1' is garbled and does not state the relevant compact embedding or justify the local convergence used. The proof then asserts a weak limit u(t) without showing that the limit is a solution on a common interval independent of n, nor that the limit is global. This step is load-bearing because it is the route from the uniform estimates (4.1) to the final solution u of Theorem 1.3. A detailed compactness argument using the local well-posedness from Theorem 1.6 and the uniform bounds of Proposition 4.1 is needed.
  3. [§3, Proposition 3.5] The proof of the localized coercivity bound is not rigorous in its treatment of the orthogonality conditions. The argument introduces z = ε √Φ_B and claims 'Thanks to the orthogonality conditions on ⃗ z, we verify easily using the property of Φ_B that (z, ∂_x R) = (z, Γ) = (z, Υ) = 0, for B large enough.' This is not a trivial verification: the orthogonality conditions (3.2) hold for ε against ∂_x ⃗D(t), ⃗Γ(t), and ⃗Ψ(t) (which are sums of modulated solitons with phases and shifts), while the localized vector z is ε multiplied by a cutoff centered at a single soliton position. The effect of the cutoff on these inner products is not analyzed, and the assertion is essential for applying the coercivity lemma (Lemma 2.4) to z. Since Proposition 3.5 supplies the bound (3.57) that starts the bootstrap, this gap is load-bearing.
  4. [§3, Lemma 3.7] The proof of Lemma 3.7 contains an unjustified conservation step. Estimate (3.43) states |Q_2(⃗R_j(t)) - Q_2(⃗R_j(T_n))| ≤ C e^{-2√ω_* c_* t}, but Q_2 is conserved along the solution flow u(t), not along the modulated solitary wave ⃗R_j(t). The modulated parameters (ω̃_j, x̃_j, γ̃_j) vary in time, and the proof does not connect the evaluation of Q_2 on ⃗R_j(t) with the conserved value Q_2(u(t)). This step feeds into the control of |ω̃_j - ω_j| that is used in Lemma 3.6 and Proposition 1.5, so it is a necessary part of the argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, Theorem 1.3] The assumption '|c_j| ≤ 1' is stronger than needed: condition (1.9) requires 1 - c_j^2 - ω_j^2 > 0, which implies |c_j| < 1. Also, Definition 1.2 fixes N ≥ 2, but Theorem 1.3 should state this explicitly since c_* is undefined for N = 1.
  2. [§1, Theorem 1.6] The well-posedness condition is stated as '{r<s, r+1/2 ≤ 2s}∪{r<s, r+1/2 ≤ 2s}', with the two sets identical, which is likely a typo; the intended second condition appears to be different. The subsequent condition '{s ≤ r+1, r> -1/2}∪{s<r+1, r ≥ -1/2}' also needs clarification.
  3. [§3, Lemma 3.2] In estimate (3.6) the exponential rate is e^{-ω_*^{3/2} c_* t}, while the bootstrap in Proposition 1.5 uses e^{-ω_*^{1/2} c_* t}. The proof should verify that these rates are compatible, or state which of the two is intended throughout.
  4. [§3, Proposition 3.5] The proof contains several garbled inequalities written as '/greaterorequalslant' and a term '∫ |ε1|^2 R_0^(3) dx' that is not localized by Φ_B in the display preceding (3.37). The manuscript needs careful proofreading to restore the intended mathematical expressions.
  5. [§1, (1.10)] In the definition of ϕ_{ω,c}(x), the formula contains an extra bracket: '2c(1−c^2−ω^2)]' should read without the closing bracket.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the multi-soliton construction is self-contained apart from external coercivity and well-posedness inputs, with a repairable hypothesis gap in Theorem 1.3 that is a correctness issue rather than a circular one.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1.3, is an existence result for a solution of the KGZ system that converges exponentially to a prescribed sum of explicit solitons. The derivation chain is not circular: the soliton profiles are given explicitly by (1.8) as solutions of the ODE (1.6)-(1.7), with no parameter fitted to the target multi-soliton. The approximate solutions are constructed by solving a final-value problem with final data exactly equal to the soliton sum R(T_n); the exponential bound (1.14) is then obtained through a bootstrap argument (Propositions 1.4, 1.5, 4.1) using coercivity, localization, and modulation estimates. The exponential rate is not an input of the construction but a consequence of the interaction estimates. The coercivity facts are quoted from external references [35] and [33], which are not authored by the present authors, and no load-bearing self-citation chain appears. Two flaws are noted but neither is circular. First, Section 3 introduces the assumption c_1 < c_2 < ... < c_N as 'without loss of generality', while Theorem 1.3 does not state this distinct-speed hypothesis; if two speeds coincide, then c_* = 0 and the exponential rate in (1.14) degenerates, so the stated convergence is not proved. This is a mathematical gap in the theorem statement, not a reduction of the conclusion to an input by definition. Second, Proposition 4.2 contains the wording 'let u0 be as obtained in Proposition 4.2' inside its own proof; this is an exposition error, since the intended reference is to the weak limit constructed earlier in the same proof, and it does not make the argument circular. Overall, the paper does not fit any of the circularity patterns: nothing is fitted and renamed as a prediction, no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation, and no known result is merely renamed. The honest finding is 'no significant circularity'.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters: alpha, beta, c_j, omega_j, x_j, and gamma_j are hypotheses of the theorem, and the soliton profiles are explicit. The only auxiliary object is the eigenfunction Psi_omega, a mathematical function rather than a new physical entity. The main unstated load is the distinct-speed hypothesis.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Distinct speeds c1 < c2 < ... < cN, hence c_* > 0
    Section 3 assumes c_k != c_m for all k != m and orders the speeds. Theorem 1.3 quantifies over c_j satisfying (1.9) without this hypothesis, and the localization estimates in Lemma 3.3 collapse when c_* = 0.
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness and blow-up alternative from [15,25]
    Theorem 1.6 is cited and used in Section 4 to extend the weak-limit solution globally and to invoke a blow-up alternative. The precise functional setting for s and r is taken from the cited works.
  • standard math Sturm-Liouville, Weyl spectral theory, and the coercivity result [35, Lemma 5]
    Section 2 uses these to identify the negative eigenfunction Psi_omega, to control L1 and L2, and to obtain the coercivity Lemma 2.4 that underlies the modulation argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-soliton solutions of Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T4JGVTLA

@misc{pith2026241115487,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-soliton solutions of Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T4JGVTLA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15487}
}
abstract

In this study, we investigate the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system with a focus on identifying multi-soliton solutions. Specifically, for a given number $N$ of solitons, we demonstrate the existence of a multi-soliton solution that asymptotically converges, in the energy space, to the sum of these solitons. Our proof extends and builds upon the previous results in \cite{cote, cotem, IA} concerning the nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger equation and the generalized Klein-Gordon equation. In contrast to the method used in \cite{cotem} to establish the existence of multi-solitons for the Klein-Gordon equation, where the difficulty arises from the directions imposed by the coercivity property, requiring the identification of eigenfunctions of the coercivity operator to derive new control estimates, the structure of the present system allows for a more refined result. Specifically, the directional constraints can be eliminated by employing orthogonality arguments derived from localization and modulation techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Couran t Lectures Notes 10, Providence, 2003

    T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Couran t Lectures Notes 10, Providence, 2003. ↑3

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Combet, Multi-soliton solutions for the supercritic al gKdV equations, Commun

    V. Combet, Multi-soliton solutions for the supercritic al gKdV equations, Commun. PDE 36 (2010) 380-419. ↑2

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    MARTEL, F

    Y. MARTEL, F. MERLE, Multi solitary waves for nonlinear S chrödinger equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 23 (2006 ) 849–864. ↑11

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Combet, Multi-existence of multisoliton for the supe rcritical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in one dimen- sion, Discrete Contin

    V. Combet, Multi-existence of multisoliton for the supe rcritical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in one dimen- sion, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 34 (2014) 1961–1993. ↑2 37

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    R. Côte, S. Le Coz, High-speed excited multisoliton in no nlinear Schrödinger equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. 96 (2011) 135–166. ↑1

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    R. Côte, Y. Martel, F. Merle, Construction of multi-soli ton solutions for the L2-supercritical gKdV and NLS equations, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 27 (2011) 273–302. ↑2

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    R. Côte, C. Muñoz, Multi-solitons for nonlinear Klein–Gordon equations, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 2 (2014) p. e15. ↑1, ↑2, ↑5

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Delebecque, S

    F. Delebecque, S. Le Coz, R. Weishupl, Multi-speed solit ary waves of nonlinear Schrödinger systems: theoretical and numerical analysis, Comm. Math. Sci. 14 (2016) 1599–162 4. ↑11

    work page 2016

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Gan, Orbital instability of standing waves for the Kle in–Gordon–Zakharov system, Adv

    Z. Gan, Orbital instability of standing waves for the Kle in–Gordon–Zakharov system, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 8 (2008) 413–428. ↑2

    2008

  2. [10]

    Z. Gan, J. Zhang, Instability of standing waves for Klei n–Gordon–Zakharov equations with different propaga- tion speeds in three space dimensions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 3 07 (2005) 219–231. ↑2

    2005

  3. [11]

    Z. Gan, B. Guo, J. Zhang, Instability of standing wave gl obal existence and blowup for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system with different degree nonlinearities, J. Diff. Equations 246 (2009) 4097-4128. ↑2

    2009

  4. [12]

    Ginibre, Y

    J. Ginibre, Y. Tsutsumi, G. Velo, On the Cauchy problem f or the Zakharov system, J. Funct. Anal. 151 (1997) 384-436. ↑1

    1997

  5. [13]

    Guo, Global smooth solution for the system of Zakharo v equations in nonhomogeneous medium, Northeast

    B. Guo, Global smooth solution for the system of Zakharo v equations in nonhomogeneous medium, Northeast. Math. J. 6 (1990) 379–390. ↑1

    1990

  6. [14]

    Guo, G.W

    B.L. Guo, G.W. Yua, Global smooth solution for the Klein -Gordon-Zakharov equations, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 4119–4124. ↑6

    1995

  7. [15]

    Hakkaev, M

    S. Hakkaev, M. Stanislavova, A. Stefanov, Orbital stab ility for periodic standing waves of the Klein-Gordon- Zakharov system and the beam equation, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 64 (2013) 265–282. ↑1, ↑6

    2013

  8. [16]

    Ianni, S

    I. Ianni, S. Le Coz, Multi-speed solitary wave solution s for nonlinear Schrödinger systems. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 89 (2014) 623–639. ↑1

    2014

  9. [17]

    Lin, Orbital stability of solitary waves for the Klei n-Gordon-Zakharov equations, Acta Math

    C. Lin, Orbital stability of solitary waves for the Klei n-Gordon-Zakharov equations, Acta Math. Appl. Sinica 15 (1999) 54–64. ↑2

    1999

  10. [18]

    Masmoudi, K

    N. Masmoudi, K. Kenji, Uniqueness of solutions for Zakh arov systems, Funkcialaj Ekvacioj 52 (2009) 233–253. ↑1

    2009

  11. [19]

    Martel, Asymptotic N -soliton-like solutions of the subcritical and critical ge neralized Korteweg-de Vries equations, American J

    Y. Martel, Asymptotic N -soliton-like solutions of the subcritical and critical ge neralized Korteweg-de Vries equations, American J. Math.127 (2005) 1103-1140. ↑2

    2005

  12. [20]

    Martel, F

    Y. Martel, F. Merle, Multi solitary waves for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Annales IHP Analyse non linéaire 23 (2006) 849-864. ↑2

    2006

  13. [21]

    Martel, F

    Y. Martel, F. Merle, T.-P. Tsai, Stability in H 1 of the sum of K solitary waves for some nonlinear Schrödinger equations in one and two space dimensions, Duke Math. J. 133 ( 2006) 405-466. ↑2

    2006

  14. [22]

    Merle, Construction of solutions with exactly k blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearity, Comm

    F. Merle, Construction of solutions with exactly k blow-up points for the Schrödinger equation with critical nonlinearity, Comm. Math. phys. 129 (1990) 223-240. ↑2

    1990

  15. [23]

    M. Ming, F. Rousset, N. Tzvetkov, Multi-solitons and re lated solutions for the water-waves system, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47 (2015) 897-954. ↑2

    2015

  16. [24]

    Miura, The Korteweg–deVries equation: a survey of results, SIAM Review 18 (1976) 412–459

    R.M. Miura, The Korteweg–deVries equation: a survey of results, SIAM Review 18 (1976) 412–459. ↑2 38

    1976

  17. [25]

    Nakamura, T

    M. Nakamura, T. Ozawa, The Cauchy problem for nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation in the Sobolev spaces, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 37 (2001) 255–293. ↑6

    2001

  18. [26]

    M. Ohta, G. Todorova, Strong instability of standing wa ves for the nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation and the Klein-Gordon–Zakharov system, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 38 (2007) 1912–1931. ↑2

    2007

  19. [27]

    Ozawa, K.Tsutaya, Y

    T. Ozawa, K.Tsutaya, Y. Tsutsumi, Well-posedness in en ergy space for the Cauchy problem of the Klein- Gordon-Zakharov equations with different propagation spee ds in three space dimensions, Math. Ann. 313 (1999) 127-140. ↑1

    1999

  20. [28]

    Ozawa, K.Tsutaya, Y

    T. Ozawa, K.Tsutaya, Y. Tsutsumi, Normal form and globa l solutions for the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov equations, Ann. IHP C, Analyse non linéaire 12 (1995) 459-503. ↑1

    1995

  21. [29]

    Shi, X.B

    Q. Shi, X.B. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Wang, Finite time blowup f or Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger system, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42 (2019) 3929–3941

    2019

  22. [30]

    Thornhill, D

    S.G. Thornhill, D. Ter Haar, Langmuir turbulence and mo dulational instability, Physics Reports 43 (1978) 43–99. ↑1

    1978

  23. [31]

    K. Tsutaya, Global existence of small amplitude soluti ons for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations, Nonlinear evolution equations and infinite dimensional dynamical systems-proceedings of the conference, World Scientific (1997). ↑1

    1997

  24. [32]

    Van Tin, Construction of multi-solitons and multi ki nk-solitons of derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Nonlinear analysis 221 (2022) 112915

    P. Van Tin, Construction of multi-solitons and multi ki nk-solitons of derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Nonlinear analysis 221 (2022) 112915. ↑2

    2022

  25. [33]

    Yin, Stability and instability of the standing waves for the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system in one space dimension, Math

    S. Yin, Stability and instability of the standing waves for the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system in one space dimension, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 41 (2018) 4428–4447. ↑2, ↑8

    2018

  26. [34]

    Zakharov, Collapse of Langmuir waves, Sov

    V.E. Zakharov, Collapse of Langmuir waves, Sov. Phys. J ETP 35 (1972) 908–914. ↑1

    1972

  27. [35]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. Shang, X. Peng, Orbital stability of solita ry waves of the coupled Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equa- tions, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 40 (2017) 2623–2633. ↑6, ↑10 39

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.