Beryllium: The smoking gun of a rejuvenated star

Amanda I. Karakas; Anne Rathsam; Jorge Mel\'endez

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Beryllium: The smoking gun of a rejuvenated star

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Beryllium abundances show that the apparently young star HD 65907 is actually the remnant of a merger between two ancient stars.

desk verdict A useful new Be upper limit for HD 65907, but the 'smoking gun' claim overstates the baseline: the star is not compared with similar-metallicity stars, so the depletion factor is uncertain. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15650 v1 pith:IWONFYM5 submitted 2024-11-23 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Anne Rathsam , Jorge Meléndez , Amanda I. Karakas This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA

keywords HD65907bluestragglerberylliumabundancelithiumdepletionstellarmergerPopulationIIstarsdebrisdiskradialvelocity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the star HD 65907, which appears to be a young 5 Gyr old star, is actually the product of a merger of two old Population II stars with a true age of about 11 Gyr. The key new evidence is beryllium: the star's Be abundance is below 0.21 dex, at least 15 times lower than the Sun, even though Be should survive unchanged in a star like this. Because Be is destroyed only at temperatures near 3.5 million K, its severe depletion points to a violent past episode, and the absence of a detectable companion favors a full merger over mass transfer. If correct, this makes beryllium a practical 'smoking gun' for identifying blue stragglers among ordinary field stars.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the temperature threshold of beryllium burning. Be is destroyed at T > 3.5 million K, higher than the Li burning temperature and far above the base of the convection zone of an F-type dwarf, so any observed Be depletion in such a star is a chemical fossil of an extreme past episode. The paper measures Be using 1D LTE spectral synthesis with the MOOG code on the 3130.420 Å Be II line in a UVES spectrum, using the solar-twin finding that Be is constant with age as the baseline. Supporting measurements include the Li resonance line at 6707.8 Å from HARPS, a 14-year radial velocity time series to exclude a companion, and a spectral energy distribution fit that reveals a 30 K debris disk at 96 AU.

What would settle it

Measure beryllium in a comparison sample of about 15 unevolved F-type stars spanning effective temperature near 6000 K, mass near 1.0 solar mass, and [Fe/H] near -0.3. If typical Be abundances in this parameter space are also at or below A(Be) of about 0.2 dex, the anomalous depletion vanishes and with it the merger argument. Alternatively, detecting a low-mass white dwarf or other compact companion in the system, through radial velocity variations or direct imaging, would favor mass transfer over a merger.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that HD 65907 is a field blue straggler formed by the merger of two old Population II stars. The paper's smoking gun is the Be abundance: spectral synthesis of the Be II resonance line at 3130.4 Å gives A(Be) < 0.21 dex, about 15 times below the solar value, and a similar upper limit A(Li) < 0.25 dex for Li. In solar-type stars Be is essentially constant with age, and the star's shallow convection zone cannot destroy it during normal evolution, so the depletion requires a high-temperature event. The authors combine this with a 14-year HARPS radial velocity series showing only about 2 m/s variation, attributed to activity, and no companion signal, and with the star's thick-disk chemistry ([Mg/Fe] about +0.34) and chemical age of about 11 Gyr. They conclude that the isochronal age of about 5 Gyr is not the star's true age but the time since the merger, and that the system originally had two inner binaries, one of which merged.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that an unevolved F-type star with roughly solar mass and [Fe/H] near -0.3 should have a beryllium abundance close to the solar value, so that A(Be) below 0.21 dex really is an anomalous depletion by at least a factor of 15.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

HD 65907's true age is its chemical age of about 11 Gyr, while the about 5 Gyr isochronal age records the time since the merger, not the star's birth.
Severe Be depletion can serve as a diagnostic to confirm other field blue stragglers among solar-type stars, a population that is hard to identify without cluster membership.
The stable radial velocity, with variations of only about 2 m/s that track the activity cycle, rules out a surviving close companion and leaves merger as the preferred formation channel.
The presence of a 30 K debris disk at about 96 AU is consistent with a star that has evolved for roughly 5 Gyr since the merger, as predicted for merger products.
The merger interpretation explains the simultaneous Li and Be depletion, the chemical age discrepancy, and the thick-disk kinematics of the star.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If Be depletion is a reliable merger marker, a targeted Be survey of metal-poor F and G stars with isochronal ages much younger than their chemical ages could uncover more field blue stragglers and constrain the rate of such mergers.
The paper's depletion factor rests on the assumption that Be in HD 65907 should match the solar value; a comparison sample of about 10 to 20 unevolved stars with similar temperature, mass, and metallicity would directly test whether the low Be is truly anomalous.
The debris disk around this post-merger star may be second-generation material from the merger event itself, which would make the disk an independent test of the merger timing.
The merger scenario predicts that other low-metallicity stars with enhanced [Mg/Fe] and depleted Li should also show Be depletion, a prediction that could be checked with archival UVES spectra.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

Read the Rathsam et al. paper on HD 65907. The new bit is the first beryllium upper limit for this star, A(Be) < 0.21, plus a fresh Li limit, a 14-year HARPS RV series, and an SED with a plausible 30 K debris disk. That is a solid package of observations, and the Li depletion argument is well made: compared with stars of similar Teff, mass, and [Fe/H], this star is depleted by at least a factor of 50. The RV analysis is careful and the conclusion that there is no close companion is reasonable given the activity correlation.

The soft spot is the Be baseline. The paper quotes a factor of 15 depletion relative to the Sun, but HD 65907 is not a solar twin. It is warmer, more massive, and [Fe/H] = -0.3. Beryllium is a spallation product that grows with metallicity, so the expected A(Be) for this star is plausibly closer to 0.8-1.0 dex than the solar 1.38. On that baseline the upper limit is still a factor of 6-10 below expectation, which is interesting, but it is not the 'at least 15 times' stated in the paper. The claim that such depletion 'can only be explained' by a merger is too strong without a matched comparison sample. The Tucci Maia et al. reference is about solar twins, not F-type sub-solar stars. This matters because the title calls Be a smoking gun; right now it is suggestive but not conclusive. Also, the Be line is at S/N ~20 and the confidence level of the upper limit is not stated, so the number itself carries unquantified uncertainty.

The RV data are private, which is a minor transparency issue, and the 0.018 km/s offset is hand-tuned; not fatal but worth noting. The SED excess conflicts with earlier Spitzer non-detections, and the paper does not directly address that tension.

Bottom line: the merger scenario for HD 65907 is plausible and supported by Li, chemistry, kinematics, and the lack of a companion. The Be measurement is a useful addition but does not by itself clinch it. The paper deserves review and publication after a revision that gives a proper Be baseline and softens the headline claims.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the star HD 65907, which exhibits a young isochronal age of about 5 Gyr despite chemical and kinematic signatures of an old Population II star. The authors determine lithium and beryllium abundances via spectral synthesis of HARPS and UVES spectra, analyze a 14-year radial velocity time series, and construct a spectral energy distribution. They report severe Li and Be depletion, a nearly constant radial velocity with no evidence of a close companion, and an infrared excess attributed to a debris disk. They conclude that the low Li and Be abundances, especially the Be upper limit of A(Be) < 0.21 dex, provide strong evidence that HD 65907 is a merger of two old Population II stars and that its 5 Gyr isochronal age dates the merger event.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, this paper proposes beryllium depletion as a practical diagnostic for identifying field blue stragglers, a population that is otherwise difficult to confirm. The analysis uses public ESO spectra, standard spectral synthesis with MOOG, and a careful radial velocity treatment, which are strengths. However, the central quantitative argument rests on comparing the Be upper limit to the solar abundance without establishing an appropriate baseline for this star's metallicity and temperature. Because Be is a spallation product that grows with stellar metallicity and age, the claimed depletion factor of at least 15 may be substantially overestimated. The paper also does not state the confidence level of the Be upper limit. These issues affect the strength of the merger conclusion, but they are addressable with additional analysis or a revised interpretation.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.2, Fig. 2] The claim that HD 65907 is "at least 15 times less Be than the Sun" is the quantitative basis for the merger argument, but the Sun is not the appropriate baseline for a star with Teff ≈ 6000 K, [Fe/H] ≈ -0.3, and an old thick-disk population. Be is a spallation product that increases with metallicity and age; a metal-poor old star is expected to have a lower Be abundance even without depletion. The authors should compare A(Be) < 0.21 to a sample of stars matched in Teff, mass, [Fe/H], and age, or at least provide an estimate of the expected Be from Galactic chemical evolution for this population. Without this, the inferred depletion factor and the statement that the depletion "can only be explained" by merger-related processes are overstated.
[Section 2.2] The upper limit A(Be) < 0.21 dex is derived from a UVES spectrum with S/N ≈ 20 in a heavily blended region, but the paper does not state the confidence level of this upper limit (e.g., 1σ or 3σ) or the procedure used to set it from the spectral synthesis. The robustness of the Be depletion claim depends on this. The authors should report the fitting statistic, the noise level, and how the limit was determined, so that readers can assess the significance of the non-detection.
[Section 3, Fig. 3] The radial velocity analysis relies on data from private communication and a hand-chosen offset of 0.018 km/s to correct for the HARPS fiber upgrade. While the 2 m/s scatter is small and supports the no-companion conclusion, the offset is not assigned an uncertainty, and the separation of the data into two chunks for the S-index correlation analysis could bias the results if the offset is incorrect. The authors should either make the data available, or state the uncertainty in the offset and perform a joint fit to the RV and activity data with the offset as a free parameter, to verify that the conclusion of no companion is robust.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] In the Results paragraph, "HD 65908" should be "HD 65907".
[Section 6, item 7] The phrase "the the star's history" contains a duplicated "the".
[Section 2.2] The statement that a severe Be depletion "excludes the need for invoking a dynamical encounter with the progenitor cloud of NGC 2516" is only as strong as the Be baseline; as written it depends on the solar comparison discussed above.
[Section 4, Fig. 6] The debris disk detection would be strengthened by showing the individual photometric data points with error bars and a quantitative measure of the excess significance; the current text only states that a 30 K blackbody "well reproduced" the excess.
[Introduction] The abbreviation "Pop. II" is used without definition; please spell out "Population II" at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Be and Li abundances are empirical measurements, and the merger interpretation is not fixed by construction or by a self-referential fit.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing abundance results, A(Li) < 0.25 and A(Be) < 0.21, are determined from HARPS and UVES spectra via spectral synthesis. These are empirical measurements, not outputs of a model that assumes the merger scenario. The merger conclusion is an interpretive inference from the low light-element abundances, the lack of a detected companion, and the chemical/kinematic evidence; no equation in the paper has a dependent variable that is its own input, and no fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction. The cited prior work (Shejeelammal et al. 2024 for stellar parameters and chemical age; Tucci Maia et al. 2015 for the Be line list and the solar-twin Be-age baseline) is external, published evidence that does not assume the present paper's conclusion, even though some coauthors overlap. The main scientific weakness is that the Be depletion is quantified relative to the Sun rather than to a metallicity- and mass-matched comparison sample, but this is a robustness concern about the interpretation, not circularity in the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spectroscopic assumptions, on adopted stellar parameters and chemical age from prior work by the same group, and on theoretical models for light-element depletion. No new physical entities are introduced. The fitted numbers are the debris disk temperature and scaling, and the radial velocity offset.

free parameters (3)

Debris disk temperature T_d = 30 K
Fitted to the infrared excess in the spectral energy distribution (Sect. 4); the disk distance of 96 AU is derived from this fitted temperature using Eq. (1).
Blackbody scaling factor for infrared excess = not specified (scaled to match data)
The 30 K blackbody is scaled to match the observed photometric points (Sect. 4, Fig. 6).
HARPS pre-upgrade radial velocity offset = 0.018 km/s
Chosen as the difference between median radial velocities about 300 days before and after the June 2015 HARPS fiber upgrade (Sect. 3); affects the interpretation of the radial velocity curve.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption 1D local thermodynamic equilibrium and MOOG spectral synthesis adequately model the Li and Be lines.
Standard assumption in abundance analysis, adopted in Sect. 2. A 3D or NLTE treatment could change the upper limits.
domain assumption The adopted stellar parameters (Teff = 5992 K, log g = 4.52, [Fe/H] = -0.315) from Shejeelammal et al. (2024) are correct.
These parameters are inputs to the model atmospheres and synthesis in Sect. 2.1; systematic errors would shift the abundance upper limits.
domain assumption YaPSI stellar models correctly predict Li and Be preservation for main-sequence stars above about 0.5 and 0.95 solar masses.
Used in Sect. 5 to argue that the progenitors could not have depleted Be before the merger unless both were near 0.5 solar masses.
domain assumption An unevolved F-type star of this mass and metallicity should have Li and Be near the solar-scaled abundances.
The depletion factors quoted (factor of 50 in Li, 15 in Be) are measured against solar abundances and literature comparisons; no direct Be baseline for this metallicity and Teff is presented in the paper.
domain assumption Radial velocity stability over 14 years excludes a close companion relevant to mass transfer.
The RV scatter is about 2 m/s and the activity-corrected amplitude about 7.4 m/s, but the companion mass limit is not quantified (Sect. 3).
domain assumption The 30 K infrared excess is thermal emission from a debris disk rather than a background source or artifact of heterogeneous photometry.
Sect. 4 interprets the SED excess as a debris disk; previous Spitzer studies (Lawler et al. 2009; Sierchio et al. 2014) did not detect an excess, and that tension is not fully addressed.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beryllium: The smoking gun of a rejuvenated star." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IWONFYM5

@misc{pith2026241115650,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beryllium: The smoking gun of a rejuvenated star},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IWONFYM5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15650}
}

abstract

Context. The chemistry and Galactic velocity components of the star HD 65907 suggest that despite its young isochronal age of $\sim$5 Gyr, it is in fact a merger of two old Population II stars. Its low Li abundance is also consistent with a mass accretion episode. Aims. We determine Li and Be abundances for this star and evaluate its radial velocity time series, activity cycle, and spectral energy distribution in search of clues regarding the origin of this enigmatic star. Methods. Li and Be abundances were determined via spectral synthesis of their resonance lines using HARPS and UVES spectra, respectively. HARPS data were also used to study variations in the star's radial velocity and activity levels. Photometric data were adopted to evaluate the stellar spectral energy distribution. Results. HD 65908 is severely Li- and Be-depleted. Its radial velocity is nearly constant ($\sigma =$ 2 m/s), with a small modulation likely associated with stellar activity, and the star shows no further signs of an undetected close companion. The excess infrared emission is consistent with a 30 K blackbody, which is interpreted as a debris disk surrounding the star. The post-merger mass, rotation rate, and evolution of this star are discussed. Conclusions. The low Li and Be abundances, in addition to the lack of evidence for a companion, are strong pieces of evidence in favor of the stellar merger scenario. In this context, Be can be used to confirm other blue stragglers among field solar-type stars, as proposed in the literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15650 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** shows a comparison between the synthetic and observed spectra for the Sun and HD 65907. An upper limit of A(Be) < 0.21 dex was obtained for HD 65907, which means that the star has at least about 15 times less Be than the Sun. As previously discussed, this excludes the need for invoking a dynamical encounter with the progenitor cloud of NGC 2516, as proposed by Fuhrmann et al. (2012). Such a severe Be depletion req… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** HARPS radial velocity curve for HD 65907. Radial velocity values from before the HARPS update were shifted by 0.018 km/s. lack of a companion – the order of magnitude of the radial velocity variation in the presence of a companion should be much greater than what is observed. In any case, to investigate possible causes for the trends, we verified the variations in the stellar activity with time using the S-index f… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** S-index from Ca II lines vs. the modified Julian date for the star HD 65907. Different colors indicate whether the data point was taken before (blue) or after (red) the HARPS upgrade [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Spectral energy distribution for HD 65907. Lines indicate the interpolated Kurucz model for [M/H] = -0.3 dex (cyan), the scaled blackbody curve for a temperature of 30 K (gray), and the sum of the two (dark blue). This excess emission was interpreted as thermal emiss…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Temperature at the base of the convective zone vs. age for stars of different masses from the YaPSI stellar models. The temperatures needed for the destruction of Li and Be are indicated. in the globular cluster M3). On the other hand, HD 65907’s mass is compatible wit…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Projected rotational velocity vs. effective temperature for blue straggler stars in the M67 open cluster. The data were taken from Bertelli Motta et al. (2018), Brady et al. (2023), and Nine et al. (2024). Nine et al. (2024) separate the stars between blue stragglers (…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

[1]

2018, A&A, 614, A55

Aguilera-Gómez, C., Ramírez, I., & Chanamé, J. 2018, A&A, 614, A55

2018
[2]

& Matt, S

Amard, L. & Matt, S. P. 2020, ApJ, 889, 108

work page 2020
[3]

J., & Scott, P

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

2009
[4]

R., Oppenheimer, R., et al

Bacchus, E., Parry, I. R., Oppenheimer, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 4796

work page 2017
[5]

Backman, D. E. & Paresce, F. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine, 1253

1993
[6]

L., et al

Bedell, M., Meléndez, J., Bean, J. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 23

2014
[7]

& Lind, K

Bensby, T. & Lind, K. 2018, A&A, 615, A151 Bertelli Motta, C., Pasquali, A., Caffau, E., & Grebel, E. K. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4314

work page 2018
[8]

Boesgaard, A. M. & Tripicco, M. J. 1986, ApJ, 302, L49

work page 1986

Show all 63 references

[9]

E., Sneden, C., Pilachowski, C

Brady, K. E., Sneden, C., Pilachowski, C. A., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 154

2023
[10]

2019, MNRAS, 485, 4052

Carlos, M., Meléndez, J., Spina, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4052

2019
[11]

& Kurucz, R

Castelli, F. & Kurucz, R. L. 2003, in Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov, W. W. Weiss, & D. F. Gray, V ol. 210, A20

2003
[12]

& Han, Z

Chen, X. & Han, Z. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 1263

2008
[13]

R., Gonzales, E

Crepp, J. R., Gonzales, E. J., Bowler, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 42

2018
[14]

R., Johnson, J

Crepp, J. R., Johnson, J. A., Howard, A. W., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 1 Cruzalèbes, P., Petrov, R. G., Robbe-Dubois, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3158 Delgado Mena, E., Bertrán de Lis, S., Adibekyan, V . Z., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A69

2013
[15]

2016, A&A, 587, A46 dos Santos, L

Desidera, S., D’Orazi, V ., & Lugaro, M. 2016, A&A, 587, A46 dos Santos, L. A., Meléndez, J., do Nascimento, J.-D., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A156

2016
[16]

2021, A&A, 654, A46

Dumont, T., Charbonnel, C., Palacios, A., & Borisov, S. 2021, A&A, 654, A46

2021
[17]

Eggleton, P. P. & Tokovinin, A. A. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 869

2008
[18]

R., Paltrinieri, B., Fusi Pecci, F., et al

Ferraro, F. R., Paltrinieri, B., Fusi Pecci, F., et al. 1997, A&A, 324, 915

1997
[19]

R., Sabbi, E., Gratton, R., et al

Ferraro, F. R., Sabbi, E., Gratton, R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, L53 François, P., Pasquini, L., Biazzo, K., Bonifacio, P., & Palsa, R. 2013, A&A, 552, A136

2006
[20]

& Chini, R

Fuhrmann, K. & Chini, R. 2017, ApJ, 834, 114

2017
[21]

2012, ApJ, 761, 159

Fuhrmann, K., Chini, R., Haas, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 159

2012
[22]

2017, ApJ, 836, 139

Fuhrmann, K., Chini, R., Kaderhandt, L., & Chen, Z. 2017, ApJ, 836, 139

2017
[23]

M., et al

Gao, X., Lind, K., Amarsi, A. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, L30

2020
[24]

V ., & de la Reza, R

Ghezzi, L., Cunha, K., Smith, V . V ., & de la Reza, R. 2010, ApJ, 724, 154 Gomes da Silva, J., Figueira, P., Santos, N., & Faria, J. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 667 Gomes da Silva, J., Santos, N. C., Adibekyan, V ., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A77

2010
[25]

A., et al

Gratton, R., D’Orazi, V ., Pacheco, T. A., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A61

2021
[26]

Gray, D. F. 2005, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres (Cam- bridge University Press)

2005
[27]

D., Katz, D., & Gómez, A

Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Katz, D., & Gómez, A. 2013, A&A, 560, A109

2013
[28]

2020, A&A, 639, A35

Hojjatpanah, S., Oshagh, M., Figueira, P., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A35

2020
[29]

C., Mayor, M., & Rebolo, R

Israelian, G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., & Rebolo, R. 2004, A&A, 414, 601

2004
[30]

Jadhav, V . V . & Subramaniam, A. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 1699

2021
[31]

Kaib, N. A. & Raymond, S. N. 2014, ApJ, 782, 60

2014
[32]

I., & Lugaro, M

Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. 2020, ApJ, 900, 179

2020
[33]

M., Beichman, C

Lawler, S. M., Beichman, C. A., Bryden, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 89

2009
[34]

D., Gosnell, N

Leiner, E., Mathieu, R. D., Gosnell, N. M., & Sills, A. 2018, ApJ, 869, L29

2018
[35]

D., Vanderburg, A., Gosnell, N

Leiner, E., Mathieu, R. D., Vanderburg, A., Gosnell, N. M., & Smith, J. C. 2019, ApJ, 881, 47

2019
[36]

Leiner, E. M. & Geller, A. 2021, ApJ, 908, 229

2021
[37]

2014, AJ, 148, 3

Liu, Q., Wang, T., & Jiang, P. 2014, AJ, 148, 3

2014
[38]

C., Meléndez, J., et al

Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., Freitas, F. C., Meléndez, J., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A73

2018
[39]

2023, MNRAS, 522, 3217 Meléndez, J., Bergemann, M., Cohen, J

Martos, G., Meléndez, J., Rathsam, A., & Carvalho Silva, G. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3217 Meléndez, J., Bergemann, M., Cohen, J. G., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A29 Meléndez, J., Ramírez, I., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 14

2023
[40]

V ., et al

Montesinos, B., Eiroa, C., Krivov, A. V ., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A51

2016
[41]

Nemec, J. M. & Harris, H. C. 1987, ApJ, 316, 172

1987
[42]

C., Mathieu, R

Nine, A. C., Mathieu, R. D., Schuler, S. C., & Milliman, K. E. 2024, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2405.20242

2024 arXiv
[43]

Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275

2023
[44]

Pallavicini, R., Cerruti-Sola, M., & Duncan, D. K. 1987, A&A, 174, 116

1987
[45]

1994, A&A, 287, 191

Pasquini, L., Liu, Q., & Pallavicini, R. 1994, A&A, 287, 191

1994
[46]

2020, MNRAS, 491, 1832 Ramírez, I., Fish, J

Prantzos, N., Abia, C., Cristallo, S., Limongi, M., & Chieffi, A. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1832 Ramírez, I., Fish, J. R., Lambert, D. L., & Allende Prieto, C. 2012, ApJ, 756, 46

2020
[47]

2023, MNRAS, 525, 4642

Rathsam, A., Meléndez, J., & Carvalho Silva, G. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 4642

2023
[48]

Sandage, A. R. 1953, AJ, 58, 61

1953
[49]

I., et al

Schirbel, L., Meléndez, J., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A116

2015
[50]

2024, A&A, 690, A107

Shejeelammal, J., Meléndez, J., Rathsam, A., & Martos, G. 2024, A&A, 690, A107

2024
[51]

M., Rieke, G

Sierchio, J. M., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y . L., & Gáspár, A. 2014, ApJ, 785, 33

2014
[52]

2016, Mem

Sills, A. 2016, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 87, 475

2016
[53]

2009, ApJ, 692, 1411

Sills, A., Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 1411

2009
[54]

2011, A&A, 535, A75

Smiljanic, R., Randich, S., & Pasquini, L. 2011, A&A, 535, A75

2011
[55]

1973, ApJ, 184, 839

Sneden, C. 1973, ApJ, 184, 839

1973
[56]

C., Boyajian, T

Spada, F., Demarque, P., Kim, Y . C., Boyajian, T. S., & Brewer, J. M. 2017, ApJ, 838, 161

2017
[57]

S., De Silva, G

Spina, L., Ting, Y . S., De Silva, G. M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 3279

2021
[58]

2014, AJ, 147, 86

Tokovinin, A. 2014, AJ, 147, 86

2014
[59]

& Kiyaeva, O

Tokovinin, A. & Kiyaeva, O. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2070

2016
[60]

2005, A&A, 441, 695

Tokovinin, A., Kiyaeva, O., Sterzik, M., et al. 2005, A&A, 441, 695

2005
[61]

Tokovinin, A. A. 1997, A&AS, 124, 75

1997
[62]

E., Bryden, G., Beichman, C

Trilling, D. E., Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 674, 1086 Tucci Maia, M., Meléndez, J., Castro, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, L10

2008
[63]

Y ., Orlov, V

Zhuchkov, R. Y ., Orlov, V . V ., & Rubinov, A. V . 2006, Astronomy Reports, 50, 62 Article number, page 7 of 7

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2018, A&A, 614, A55

Aguilera-Gómez, C., Ramírez, I., & Chanamé, J. 2018, A&A, 614, A55

2018

[2] [2]

& Matt, S

Amard, L. & Matt, S. P. 2020, ApJ, 889, 108

work page 2020

[3] [3]

J., & Scott, P

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

2009

[4] [4]

R., Oppenheimer, R., et al

Bacchus, E., Parry, I. R., Oppenheimer, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 4796

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Backman, D. E. & Paresce, F. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine, 1253

1993

[6] [6]

L., et al

Bedell, M., Meléndez, J., Bean, J. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 23

2014

[7] [7]

& Lind, K

Bensby, T. & Lind, K. 2018, A&A, 615, A151 Bertelli Motta, C., Pasquali, A., Caffau, E., & Grebel, E. K. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4314

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Boesgaard, A. M. & Tripicco, M. J. 1986, ApJ, 302, L49

work page 1986