Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Droplet Simulations in Computer Graphics: Theories, Methods and Applications

T0 review · 6 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SPH and PBD made droplet splashes practical, survey shows

desk verdict A wide-ranging but sloppy survey whose transcription errors, especially the Ohnesorge and Tait equations, undercut its usefulness as a reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15880 v1 pith:7FR6UR75 submitted 2024-11-24 physics.flu-dyn cs.GR

Hossein Keshtkar , Nadine Aburumman This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncs.GR MSC 76D0576M2865M7568U05 PACS 47.55.D47.11.-j
keywords dropletsimulationcomputergraphicsSmoothed-ParticleHydrodynamicsPosition-BasedDynamicssurfacetensionfreeflowEulerianmethodsNavier-Stokesequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review sets out to map how droplet simulations for computer graphics have evolved, with a focus on the theoretical foundations and the methods that made realistic splashes computationally practical. Its central claim is that particle-based approaches, especially Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and Position-Based Dynamics (PBD), now dominate the field because they balance visual detail against cost, while grid-based Eulerian solvers remain accurate but expensive. The review argues that progress has come from adding surface tension, incompressibility, and liquid-wall interaction models to these particle frameworks, and that machine-learning pressure solvers are an emerging way to cut Eulerian costs further. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as a field guide for choosing and combining simulation methods for droplet animation.

What carries the argument

The central organizing machinery is the comparison of Lagrangian particle discretizations (SPH and PBD) against Eulerian grid discretizations of the Navier-Stokes equations, with the SPH smoothing kernel as the workhorse that turns continuous fluid fields into weighted particle interactions. The review walks through the poly6, spiky, and viscosity kernels, the Tait equation for weakly compressible pressure, and Akinci-style pairwise cohesion and adhesion forces that implement surface tension without ghost particles. In the Eulerian half, the projection method that solves a pressure Poisson equation to enforce incompressibility is the key mechanism, and the boundary-condition section names the contact angle and contact-line treatment as the decisive physical inputs for impact visuals.

What would settle it

Checking Eq. (16) against the standard Ohnesorge number definition $\mathrm{Oh} = \mu/\sqrt{\rho\sigma D}$ and checking Eq. (22) against the standard Tait exponent $\lambda = 7$ would settle whether the review's transcriptions are reliable; if the printed formulas fail dimensional analysis, the survey's claim to be an in-depth methodological guide is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is a synthesis: droplet simulation in computer graphics has converged on a small set of practical ingredients. The Lagrangian particle view, in which each droplet is a cloud of interacting particles, lets SPH and PBD produce splash crowns, coalescence, and surface-tension effects at interactive speeds, whereas Eulerian grid solvers solve the same Navier-Stokes equations with higher accuracy but much larger computational demands. The review identifies surface tension as the central modeling challenge, tracing it from macroscopic curvature forces to pairwise cohesion and adhesion forces between particles, and treats boundary conditions such as no-slip, wetting, surface roughness, and contact-line treatment as the place where physical realism is won or lost. It also presents weakly compressible and incompressible SPH variants as the main strategies for avoiding the density errors and tensile instability that distort free surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's value rests on the premise that the equations and citations it transcribes faithfully represent the original papers, because if the formulas are wrong the reader cannot use the review as a reliable guide.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners can treat SPH and PBD as the default choices for real-time droplet effects, reserving Eulerian solvers for offline shots where physical accuracy matters more than speed.
  • Surface tension is best implemented as symmetric pairwise cohesion and adhesion forces, which prevents the particle clustering that curvature-only models cause.
  • Weakly compressible and incompressible SPH formulations offer a concrete trade-off between speed and stability, with the Tait equation preferred when small density fluctuations are acceptable.
  • Boundary conditions, particularly contact angle and contact-line dynamics, are at least as important as the bulk solver for producing believable spreading and splashing.
  • Machine-learning pressure solvers are a plausible path to lowering Eulerian cost, though their compute grows quickly in three-dimensional settings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension of this survey is a side-by-side benchmark of SPH and PBD on identical crown-splash scenarios, since the review argues both can produce the effect but never compares their output head-to-head.
  • Because the review pins realism on surface-particle detection and pairwise surface forces, a reader would expect future work to focus on robust surface identification rather than on new bulk solvers.
  • The dimensionless numbers listed in the paper, such as the Reynolds, Weber, and Ohnesorge numbers, could be used as a parameter checklist for CGI artists, translating physical regimes into visual style choices, though the paper does not make that connection itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey of droplet simulation techniques for computer graphics, with emphasis on smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), incompressible SPH variants, position-based dynamics (PBD), Eulerian/grid-based methods, and boundary conditions for droplet impact. It reviews historical work from early particle systems to current surface-tension models and briefly discusses applications in entertainment, medicine, and engineering. The paper does not present new derivations or experimental results; its value depends on the accuracy of its equation transcriptions and literature attributions.

Significance. If its technical content were reliable, this survey would be a useful entry point for graphics researchers seeking the relevant equations for SPH-based droplet simulation, and it assembles a broad reference set connecting fluid-mechanics dimensionless numbers to visual effects. The paper is less useful as a review of PBD, which receives only a brief qualitative treatment. More importantly, the manuscript contains objective transcription errors in central definitions (the Ohnesorge number, the Tait equation, the pressure Poisson equation) and an unsupported historical attribution, so as printed it cannot be trusted as a reference for the formulas it compiles. The high-level narrative is broadly consistent with the literature, but the survey's core purpose—faithfully reporting prior results—is compromised.

major comments (6)
  1. [Section II-B, Eq. (16)] The Ohnesorge number is printed as Oh = μ√(ρUσ) = √We/Re. This definition is dimensionally inconsistent: μ√(ρUσ) has units kg^2 m^-2 s^-5/2, so it cannot be a dimensionless number, and the equality with √We/Re is therefore incorrect. The standard definition is Oh = μ/√(ρσD) = √We/Re, where D is the droplet diameter. Because the Ohnesorge number is one of the central dimensionless groups in droplet impact, this error in a key equation undermines the survey's reliability.
  2. [Section II-C, Eq. (22)] The Tait equation is written as P = B((ρ/ρ0)^λ − 1), and the text states that Becker and Teschner suggested λ = 0.7. In the cited Becker–Teschner WCSPH paper the exponent is 7, not 0.7. The exponent controls the stiffness of the equation of state; using 0.7 instead of 7 would produce density fluctuations orders of magnitude larger than the near-incompressibility that the method is designed to enforce. This is a substantive misstatement of the cited method.
  3. [Section I, first paragraph and reference [1]] The sentence "Dorsey et al. used a particle system to synthesize drops for large solid models... [1]" cites reference [1], which is the SIGGRAPH 2005 course "Digital modeling of the appearance of materials" by Dorsey and Rushmeier. That course does not describe a droplet particle system. The historical attribution is therefore unsupported as printed; either the citation or the description must be corrected.
  4. [Section II-C, Eq. (21)] The pressure Poisson equation for the ISPH projection is printed as ∇²P = ρ ∇ν Δt. As written, the right-hand side is not a scalar and is dimensionally inconsistent, so the equation cannot be correct. The standard form is ∇²P = (ρ/Δt)∇·u (with sign and density conventions depending on the formulation). This misformulation occurs in the section where the authors discuss enforcing incompressibility, a load-bearing part of the survey.
  5. [Section III-A, after Eq. (28)] The text contains the literal placeholder "[CITE FLUID SIMULATION BOOK]" and, immediately before Eq. (30), an empty equation label "[Eq. ]". These unresolved editorial gaps prevent the reader from tracing the advection discretization to a source and from referencing Eq. (30) properly. A published survey should be free of such placeholders.
  6. [Sections I and II] The abstract and title present PBD as one of the two central particle-based methods, but the manuscript never presents the PBD formulation itself: no position/velocity update, no density constraint, and no constraint projection are given. The only substantive PBD discussion is the paragraph on Xing et al. in Section I and routine references to other PBD works. The survey therefore does not deliver the promised in-depth coverage of PBD, and this gap is within the paper's stated scope.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II-A, Eq. (2)] The second branch of the cubic spline kernel is printed incompletely: for 1 ≤ q < 2 the standard form contains a factor (2 − q)^3 (typically divided by 6), but the expression as printed stops at "2/3 − q^2 + 1/2". Please correct the piecewise definition.
  2. [Section II-A, Eqs. (2)–(5)] The kernel normalization constant a_d is used but never defined; its value depends on the spatial dimension and on the kernel form, and without it the kernel expressions are incomplete.
  3. [Section II-A, text near Eq. (7)] The name "Mullet et al." appears where "Müller et al." is meant; please unify the spelling throughout.
  4. [References] Several references are incompletely formatted, for example [10] lists a volume number and "Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation" without a publication year or page numbers, and [13] gives "vol. 44, pp. 1–10" without a year. Please normalize the reference list against a consistent style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey makes no derivation claims, and its self-citations are non-load-bearing bibliography entries.

full rationale

This is a survey paper with no original derivations, fitted parameters, or predictive claims. All equations are attributed to external prior work (Becker & Teschner, Akinci, Muller, etc.), and the surrounding text is a historical and applications-oriented review. The only self-citations ([18], [68]) appear in bibliographic enumerations of prior work and are not used to justify any derivation or to exclude alternatives. The equation transcription errors and mismatched attributions flagged by the skeptic are accuracy and reliability problems, not circularity: they do not define a result in terms of itself and do not fit a parameter to a target and then relabel it as a prediction. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own argumentative structure, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced. The paper is a review that relies on established formulations (Navier-Stokes, SPH kernel functions, Tait equation of state) inherited from cited prior work. The only assumptions are standard domain assumptions from the cited papers (e.g., incompressibility, free-surface conditions), which the review does not justify or test.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Droplet Simulations in Computer Graphics: Theories, Methods and Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7FR6UR75

@misc{pith2026241115880,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Droplet Simulations in Computer Graphics: Theories, Methods and Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7FR6UR75}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15880}
}
read the original abstract

Creating realistic droplet simulations and animations has long been a formidable challenge for researchers and developers due to the inherent complexity of fluid dynamics. Achieving lifelike droplet splash simulations while managing computational resources has often resulted in sacrifices compromising the realism of visualizations. Nevertheless, significant progress has been made in the past two decades, driven by advancements in particle-based methods such as Position-Based Dynamics (PBD) and Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). These methods have enabled the simulation of droplet splash behaviour with increasing accuracy and reduced computational complexity. Integrating features like surface tensions, fluid incompressibility, and liquid-wall interactions has further enhanced the realism of the simulations. This paper provides an in-depth exploration of the theoretical foundations and methodologies employed in droplet simulations and how they have evolved over time. Accurate droplet interaction visualization holds immense potential across diverse applications, including gaming, animation, medical simulations, and engineering scenarios like 3D printing simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15880 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Due to the impact of solids and liquids, droplet simulations exhibit a range of microscopy phenomena, such as spreading, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Droplet impact captured using high-speed photography [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Droplet simulation as shown by [11] [20]. Modifications of the SPH framework usually resulted in improved versions of the model, each with added capacity to capture more realistic fluid interactions such as the work done by Fang et al. [21]. However, a drawback of the traditional SPH framework was the density underestimation in fluid-air or fluid-solid interfaces. In the traditional SPH framework, the surface partic… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Combination of multiple particles to resemble liquid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulation of a droplet shape. (a) initial distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Droplet interaction simulated by [28], where their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A bursting bubble. (a) using SPH without enrichment, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic view of surface roughness on droplet point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Contact angle of a liquid droplet on a solid surface. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Digital modeling of the appearance of materials,

    J. Dorsey and H. Rushmeier, “Digital modeling of the appearance of materials,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses , ser. SIGGRAPH ’05. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2005, p. 1–es. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1198555.1198694

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    Animation of water droplets moving down a surface,

    K. Kaneda, S. Ikeda, and H. Yamashita, “Animation of water droplets moving down a surface,” The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ %28SICI%291099-1778%28199901/03%2910%3A1%3C15%3A% 3AAID-VIS192%3E3.0.CO%3B2-P

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Animation of water droplet flow on curved surfaces

    K. Kaneda, K. Zuyama, H. Yamashita, and T. Nishita, “Animation of water droplet flow on curved surfaces.” Proceedings of the Pacific Graphics 1996, 1996, p. 50–65

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Simulating the flow of liquid droplets

    P. Fournier, A. Habibi, and P. Poulin, “Simulating the flow of liquid droplets.” Graphics Interface, pp. 133–142, 1998

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    A new water droplet model using metaball in the gravitational field,

    Y . J. Yu, H. Y . Jung, and H. G. Cho, “A new water droplet model using metaball in the gravitational field,” Computer and Graphics , vol. 23, p. 213–222, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    A volume-preserving approach for modeling and animating water flows generated by metaballs

    R. Tong, K. Kaneda, and H. Yamashita, “A volume-preserving approach for modeling and animating water flows generated by metaballs.” Visual Computer, vol. 18, pp. 469–480, 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    V olume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries

    C. W. Hirt and B. D. Nichols, “V olume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.” Journal of Computational Physics (Journal of Computational Physics) , vol. 39, pp. 201–225, 1981

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    Modeling the splash of a droplet impacting a solid surface

    M. Bussmann, S. Chandra, and J. Mostaghimi, “Modeling the splash of a droplet impacting a solid surface.” Physics of Fluids , vol. 12, pp. 3121–3132, 2000

    work page 2000

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Phenomena of droplet–surface interactions

    S. Sikalo and E. N. Ganic, “Phenomena of droplet–surface interactions.” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science , vol. 31, pp. 97–110, 2006

    2006

  2. [10]

    Physically-based droplet interaction,

    R. Jones and R. Southern, “Physically-based droplet interaction,” vol

  3. [11]

    Water drops on surfaces

    H. Wang, P. Mucha, and G. Turk, “Water drops on surfaces.” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 24, pp. 921–929, 2005

    2005

  4. [12]

    Position based fluids

    M. Macklin and M. Muller, “Position based fluids.” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 32, pp. 1–12, 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Position-based simulation of continuous materials

    J. Bender, D. Koschier, P. Charrier, and D. Weber, “Position-based simulation of continuous materials.” Computers & Graphics , vol. 44, pp. 1–10, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Long range attachments - a method to simulate inextensible clothing in computer games

    T. Y . Kim, N. Chentanez, and M. Muller, “Long range attachments - a method to simulate inextensible clothing in computer games.” vol

  7. [15]

    Position-based elastic rods

    N. Umetani, R. Schmidt, and J. Stam, “Position-based elastic rods.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Unified particle physics for real-time applications

    M. Macklin, M. Muller, N. Chentanez, and T. Y . Kim, “Unified particle physics for real-time applications.” ACM Transitions on Graphics, vol. 3, pp. 1–12, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Unified simulation of rigid and flexible bodies using position based dynamics

    M. Francu and P. Moldoveanu, “Unified simulation of rigid and flexible bodies using position based dynamics.” Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Virtual Reality Interactions and Physical Simulations, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Isph–pbd: Coupled simulation of incompressible fluids and deformable bodies

    N. Abu Rumman, P. Nair, P. M ¨uller, L. Barthe, and D. Vanderhaeghe, “Isph–pbd: Coupled simulation of incompressible fluids and deformable bodies.” The Visual Computer , vol. 36, pp. 893–910, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Position-based surface tension flow

    J. Xing, L. Ruan, B. Wang, B. Zhu, and B. Chen, “Position-based surface tension flow.” ACM Transactions on Graphics , vol. 41, pp. 1–12, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (sph) for free-surface flows: past, present and future

    D. Violeau and Rogers, “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (sph) for free-surface flows: past, present and future.” Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. 54, pp. 1–26, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Simulations of droplet spreading and solidification using an improved sph models,

    H. S. Fang, K. Bao, J. A. Wei, H. Zhang, E. H. Wu, and L. L. Zheng, “Simulations of droplet spreading and solidification using an improved sph models,” Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications , vol. 55, pp. 124–143, 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    Sph without a tensile instability

    J. Monaghan, “Sph without a tensile instability.” Journal of Computa- tional Physics, vol. 159, pp. 290–311, 2000

    2000

  15. [23]

    A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced points

    D. Shepard, “A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced points.” Proceedings of the 23rd ACM national conference, 1968, pp. 517–524

    1968

  16. [24]

    Particle based fluid simu- lation for interactive applications

    M. Muller, D. Charypar, and M. Gross, “Particle based fluid simu- lation for interactive applications.” Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 2003, pp. 154–159

    2003

  17. [25]

    Particle based viscoelastic fluid simulation

    S. Clavet, P. Beaudoin, and P. Poulin, “Particle based viscoelastic fluid simulation.” Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation, 2005, pp. 219–228

    2005

  18. [26]

    Explicit mesh surfaces for particle based fluids

    J. Yu, C. Wojtan, G. Turk, and C. Yap, “Explicit mesh surfaces for particle based fluids.” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, pp. 815–824, 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    Enrich- ing sph simulation by approximate capillary waves

    S. Yang, X. He, H. Wang, S. Li, G. Wang, E. Wu, and K. Zhou, “Enrich- ing sph simulation by approximate capillary waves.” The Eurographics Association, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Versatile surface tension and adhesion for sph fluids

    N. Akinci, G. Akinci, and M. Teschner, “Versatile surface tension and adhesion for sph fluids.” ACM Transactions on Graphics , vol. 32, pp. 1–8, 2013

    2013

  21. [29]

    Sur- face tension model based on implicit incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics for fluid simulation

    X. K. Wang, X. J. Ban, Y . L. Zhang, S. N. Liu, and P. F. Ye, “Sur- face tension model based on implicit incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics for fluid simulation.” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 32, pp. 1186–1197, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Dynamic capillary phenomena using incom- pressible sph

    P. Nair and T. Poschel, “Dynamic capillary phenomena using incom- pressible sph.” Chemical Engineering Science , vol. 176, pp. 192–204, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Weakly compressible sph for free sur- face flows

    M. Becker and M. Teschner, “Weakly compressible sph for free sur- face flows.” Eurographics/ ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, pp. 1–8, 2007

    2007

  24. [32]

    Smoothed particle hydro- dynamics on gpus,

    T. Harada, S. Koshizuka, and Y . Kawaguchi, “Smoothed particle hydro- dynamics on gpus,” Computer Graphics International , 01 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    In- terstellar cloud collisions

    C. J. Lattanzio, J. J. Monaghan, H. Pongracic, and M. P. Schwarz, “In- terstellar cloud collisions.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 215, pp. 125–147, 1985

    1985

  26. [34]

    V olume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries

    G. Johnson, R. Stryk, and S. Beissel, “V olume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , vol. 139, pp. 347–373, 1996

    1996

  27. [35]

    Physics of droplet impact on various substrates and its current advancements in interfacial science: A review

    A. M. Karim, “Physics of droplet impact on various substrates and its current advancements in interfacial science: A review.” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 133, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Pairwise force smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for multiphase flow: surface tension and contact line dynamics

    A. Tartakovsky and A. Panchenko, “Pairwise force smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for multiphase flow: surface tension and contact line dynamics.” Journal of Computational Physics , vol. 305, pp. 1119– 114, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Modeling low reynolds number incom- pressible flows using sph

    J. Morris, P. Fox, and Y . Zhu, “Modeling low reynolds number incom- pressible flows using sph.” Journal of Computational Physics , vol. 136, pp. 214–226, 1997

    1997

  30. [38]

    An sph projection method

    S. Cumins and M. Rudman, “An sph projection method.” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 152, pp. 584–607, 1999

    1999

  31. [39]

    Modelling free surface flows with smoothed particle hydrodynamics

    L. Sigalotti, J. Daza, and A. Donoso, “Modelling free surface flows with smoothed particle hydrodynamics.” Condensed Matter Physics , vol. 46, pp. 359–366, 2006

    2006

  32. [40]

    Particle-based simulation of fluids

    S. Premoze, T. Tasdizen, J. Bigler, A. Lefohn, and R. Whitaker, “Particle-based simulation of fluids.”Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 22, pp. 401–410, 2003

    2003

  33. [41]

    An improved free surface modeling for incom- pressible sph

    P. Nair and G. Tomar, “An improved free surface modeling for incom- pressible sph.” Computer and Fluid , vol. 102, pp. 304–314, 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Theoretical considera- tions on the free-surface role in the smoothed-particle-hydrodynamics model

    A. Colagrossi, M. Antuono, and D. Le Touze, “Theoretical considera- tions on the free-surface role in the smoothed-particle-hydrodynamics model.” Physical Review E , vol. 79, 2009

    2009

  35. [43]

    A new scheme for identi- fying free surface particles in improved sph

    Z. Xing, D. WenYang, and M. QingWei, “A new scheme for identi- fying free surface particles in improved sph.” Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy , vol. 55, pp. 1454–1463, 2012

    2012

  36. [44]

    A simplified sph method for simulation of free surface flows

    G. Shobeyri, “A simplified sph method for simulation of free surface flows.” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 245–258, 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    Modeling of surface tension and contact angles with smoothed particle hydrodynamics

    A. Tartakovsky and P. Meakin, “Modeling of surface tension and contact angles with smoothed particle hydrodynamics.” Physical Review E , vol. 72, 2005

    2005

  38. [46]

    7 - physics-based animation,

    M.-F. Matthias, P. Mark, G. Markus, K. Richard, and W. Martin, “7 - physics-based animation,” in Point-Based Graphics , ser. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Graphics, M. GROSS and H. PFISTER, Eds. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann, 2007, pp. 340–387. [Online]. Available: http...

    2007

  39. [47]

    Computational methods in fluid dynamics using commercial cfd codes,

    G. Iaccarino, “Computational methods in fluid dynamics using commercial cfd codes,” Center for Turbulence Research , 2004. [Online]. Available: https://web.stanford.edu/class/me469b/handouts/ incompressible.pdf

    2004

  40. [48]

    L08 navier stokes,

    J. Dunkel, “L08 navier stokes,” Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 2014. [Online]. Avail- able: https://math.mit.edu/ ∼dunkel/Teach/18.354 2014S/lecture notes/ L08 navier stokes.pdf

    2014

  41. [49]

    An introduction of droplet impact dynamics to engineering students,

    S. Moghtadernejad, C. Lee, and M. Jadidi, “An introduction of droplet impact dynamics to engineering students,” Fluids, vol. 5, no. 3, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/5/3/107

    2020

  42. [50]

    Drop impact on a solid surface,

    C. Josserand and S. Thoroddsen, “Drop impact on a solid surface,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 365–391, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-122414-034401

    2016

  43. [51]

    Solving the fluid pressure with an iterative multi- resolution guided network,

    R.-J. Xu and B. Ren, “Solving the fluid pressure with an iterative multi- resolution guided network,” Vis. Comput., vol. 38, no. 2, p. 433–442, feb

  44. [52]

    Accelerating eulerian fluid simulation with convolutional networks,

    J. Tompson, K. Schlachter, P. Sprechmann, and K. Perlin, “Accelerating eulerian fluid simulation with convolutional networks,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 70 , ser. ICML’17. JMLR.org, 2017, p. 3424–3433

    2017

  45. [53]

    Stable fluids,

    J. Stam, “Stable fluids,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques , ser. SIGGRAPH ’99. USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1999, p. 121–128. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/311535.311548

    1999

  46. [54]

    Back and forth error compensation and correction methods for removing errors induced by uneven gradients of the level set function,

    T. F. Dupont and Y . Liu, “Back and forth error compensation and correction methods for removing errors induced by uneven gradients of the level set function,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 311–324, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect....

    2003

  47. [55]

    An unconditionally stable maccormack method,

    A. Selle, R. Fedkiw, B. Kim, Y . Liu, and J. Rossignac, “An unconditionally stable maccormack method,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 350–371, June 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-007-9166-4

    2008 doi

  48. [56]

    Boundary-layer effects in droplet splashing,

    G. Riboux and J. M. Gordillo, “Boundary-layer effects in droplet splashing,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 96, p. 013105, Jul 2017. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013105

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    J. B. Schmidt, J. Breitenbach, I. V . Roisman, and C. Tropea, Interaction of Drops and Sprays with a Heated Wall . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 333–353. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09008-0 17

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    Effects of surface roughness on splashing characteristics of large droplets with digital inline holographic imaging,

    Q. Wang, X. Lin, Y . Lin, J. Ma, J. Xiao, Y . Wu, and J. Wang, “Effects of surface roughness on splashing characteristics of large droplets with digital inline holographic imaging,” Cold Regions Science and Technology , vol. 191, p. 103373, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://w...

    2021

  51. [59]

    Modeling of droplet impact on a heated solid surface with a diffuse interface model,

    E. Gelissen, C. van der Geld, M. Baltussen, and J. Kuerten, “Modeling of droplet impact on a heated solid surface with a diffuse interface model,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 123, p. 103173, 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/a...

    2020

  52. [60]

    Predicting the drag of rough surfaces,

    D. Chung, N. Hutchins, M. P. Schultz, and K. A. Flack, “Predicting the drag of rough surfaces,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 439–471, 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-062520-115127

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Dns of droplet impact on a solid particle: Effect of wettability on solid conjugate heat transfer,

    S. Das, A. Panda, H. Patel, N. Deen, and J. Kuipers, “Dns of droplet impact on a solid particle: Effect of wettability on solid conjugate heat transfer,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer , vol. 158, p. 119859, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect...

    2020

  54. [62]

    Modeling the effects of contact angle hysteresis on the sliding of droplets down inclined surfaces,

    G. Ahmed, M. Sellier, M. Jermy, and M. Taylor, “Modeling the effects of contact angle hysteresis on the sliding of droplets down inclined surfaces,” European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids , vol. 48, pp. 218–230, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ scien...

    2014

  55. [63]

    Contact angle hysteresis explained,

    L. Gao and T. J. McCarthy, “Contact angle hysteresis explained,” Langmuir, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 6234–6237, 2006, pMID: 16800680. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1021/la060254j

    2006 doi

  56. [64]

    Droplet spreading on rough surfaces: Tackling the contact line boundary condition,

    N. T. Chamakos, M. E. Kavousanakis, A. G. Boudouvis, and A. G. Papathanasiou, “Droplet spreading on rough surfaces: Tackling the contact line boundary condition,” Physics of Fluids , vol. 28, no. 2, 02 2016, 022105. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941577

    2016 doi

  57. [65]

    Griebel and M

    M. Griebel and M. Klitz, Simulation of Droplet Impact with Dynamic Contact Angle Boundary Conditions . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 297–325. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00786-1 13

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    Dynamic contact angle model for resolving low-viscosity droplet oscillations during spreading over a surface with varying wettability,

    R. K. Dwivedi, V . Jain, and K. Muralidhar, “Dynamic contact angle model for resolving low-viscosity droplet oscillations during spreading over a surface with varying wettability,” Phys. Rev. Fluids, vol. 7, p. 034002, Mar 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/1...

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    Real-time rain simulation in cartoon style,

    Z.-X. Feng, M. Tang, J.-X. Dong, and S.-C. Chou, “Real-time rain simulation in cartoon style,” in Ninth International Conference on Computer Aided Design and Computer Graphics (CAD-CG’05) , Dec 2005, pp. 6 pp.–

    2005

  60. [68]

    Collision detection for articulated deformable characters,

    N. A. Rumman, M. Schaerf, and D. Bechmann, “Collision detection for articulated deformable characters,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games , ser. MIG ’15. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015, p. 215–220. [Online]. Ava...

    2015

  61. [69]

    A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course,

    S. Cai, X. Wang, and F.-K. Chiang, “A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course,” Computers in Human Behavior , vol. 37, pp. 31–40, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214002271

    2014

  62. [70]

    A simulation study investigating the spread of water droplets during oxygen therapy: where is it safe to stand?

    J. Subramaniam, D. Meeks, A. Forbes, D. J. N. Wong, C. Ward, and A. McKechnie, “A simulation study investigating the spread of water droplets during oxygen therapy: where is it safe to stand?” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesth´esie, vol. 68, pp. 1448– 1449, 2021

    2021

  63. [71]

    Droplet interface in additive manufacturing: From process to application,

    Z. Sun, X. Zeng, X. Deng, X. Zhang, and Y . Zhang, “Droplet interface in additive manufacturing: From process to application,” Droplet, vol. 2, no. 2, p. e57, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dro2.57

    2023 doi

  64. [72]

    Numerical simulation of water droplet impact test on aircraft wing structure,

    S. Manigandan, Dineshkumar, M. Ramanathan, P. Gunasekar, J. Devipriya, S. Nithya, and R. Gokulnath, “Numerical simulation of water droplet impact test on aircraft wing structure,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series , vol. 1276, no. 1, p. 012034, aug 2019. [Online]. Availabl...

    2019 doi

  65. [133]

    Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 2012

    2012

  66. [139]

    Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 2017, pp. 1–10

    2017

  67. [2022]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-020-02025-x

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-020-02025-x

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.