Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 83 references

Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers in Nanodiamonds as Reference Single-Photon Emitters

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nanodiamonds containing single nitrogen-vacancy centers can serve as portable reference single-photon emitters, with one registered emitter reproducing its saturation count rate to within 3% across two laboratories.

desk verdict A useful proof-of-principle for registered NV- reference emitters, but the 3% repeatability is within-lab only; the cross-lab portability claim is softer than the abstract implies. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15991 v2 pith:FF7JW5VF submitted 2024-11-24 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Nikesh Patel , Benyam Dejen , Stephen Church , Philip Dolan , Patrick Parkinson This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersnanodiamondssingle-photonemittersreferencestandardsaturationcountrateg(2)(0)cross-laboratoryreproducibilityquantumphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

To compare single-photon emitters measured on different apparatus, the field needs a reference source with a known emission rate. This paper argues that a nanodiamond containing exactly one negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV$^-$) center can fill that role: it emits single photons at room temperature, does not photobleach, and can be registered on a substrate so the same physical emitter can be found again. The authors screened thousands of nanodiamonds, selected six candidate centers, and remeasured them at a second laboratory with a different microscope and different detectors. Their reference emitter reproduced its saturation count rate to within 3% across the two sites, and its single-photon purity, measured by $g^{(2)}(0)$, stayed below 0.5. The result is a model protocol for calibrating single-photon measurement systems against a portable standard.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the count-rate saturation curve, modeled as $C(P) = k_\infty P/(P+P_{\rm sat}) + bP$, where $P$ is the pump power at the sample, $k_\infty$ is the maximum observable count rate at infinite power, $P_{\rm sat}$ is the power at half that rate, and $b$ accounts for background. Fitting this curve and then operating at $0.8\,P_{\rm sat}$ is the mechanism that transfers excitation conditions between apparatus: at the same fraction of saturation, the emitter sees nominally the same absorbed photon flux even when collection optics differ. The second-order correlation function $g^{(2)}(t)$, fitted with a three-level model, supplies the single-photon purity check, and fiducial markers on the substrate make the same physical nanodiamond findable across laboratories.

What would settle it

Take the same registered nanodiamond to a third laboratory with a different objective and beam profile, run the 80%-of-saturation protocol, and check whether the normalized saturation curve and the count rate at 80% saturation still overlap with the original data; a deviation beyond the reported 3% repeatability would falsify the standardization claim. A faster in-house test is to rotate the sample or deliberately change the beam profile at one site and see whether the normalized saturation curve changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the saturation curve of a single NV$^-$ center in a nanodiamond can standardize excitation conditions across different experimental setups. The protocol fits each emitter's count rate versus pump power to a saturation model and then pumps the emitter at 80% of its fitted saturation power; at that operating point the center is excited at the same rate regardless of collection efficiency, beam profile, or objective. When one registered nanodiamond was remeasured at a second laboratory over three months, its count rate at that operating point varied by only 3%, and its $g^{(2)}(0)$ remained consistent, confirming single-photon emission. The measured ratio of saturation count rates between the two laboratories was 0.32, which the paper interprets as a system throughput correction that can be applied to quantitative comparisons of other emitters.

Load-bearing premise

The protocol assumes that pumping at 80% of the fitted saturation power reproduces identical internal excitation conditions across different setups, meaning the normalized saturation curve is unaffected by changes in beam shape, polarization, or collection geometry; this invariance was demonstrated for only one emitter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the protocol holds, any laboratory with a confocal microscope can establish its own single-photon count-rate reference by screening local nanodiamonds, without shipping a custom sample.
  • The ratio of saturation count rates between two setups gives a correction factor for photon throughput, enabling quantitative comparison of emission rates of other single-photon sources measured in different labs.
  • A registered nanodiamond can be re-measured over months with no observed photodamage, so it can serve as a durable transfer standard for detector calibration and inter-laboratory comparisons.
  • Because the emitter is tested at the same point on its saturation curve rather than at an arbitrary pump power, the $g^{(2)}(0)$ values become comparable across systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the 3% repeatability is demonstrated for one emitter only, so the key open question is whether the normalized saturation curve is invariant across arbitrary beam profiles, polarizations, and collection geometries; this can be tested by deliberately perturbing each condition.
  • Editorial inference: because the fitted $P_{\rm sat}$ changed by roughly a factor of two across repeat sessions while the saturation count rate stayed stable, the protocol depends on re-fitting $P_{\rm sat}$ every session rather than on an absolute power calibration.
  • Editorial inference: the same operate-at-a-fixed-fraction-of-saturation trick could in principle transfer to other saturable single-photon emitters, such as quantum dots or defects in hexagonal boron nitride, creating a family of portable references rather than a single defect type.
  • Editorial inference: widespread adoption would benefit from an open registry of registered emitters with fiducial coordinates and measured saturation curves, so laboratories could compare against the same physical object.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that nanodiamonds hosting single NV− color centers can act as portable reference single-photon emitters, enabling reproduction of identical internal excitation conditions across different laboratories by pumping at 80% of the fitted saturation power. The authors screen thousands of emitters, select six candidates, and remeasure them at a second laboratory. They confirm four as single emitters at the second site and report that one emitter (#B) shows a 3% standard deviation in saturation count rate over three measurement sessions at UoM. They also derive cross-laboratory ratios for count rate and saturation power and argue that these ratios allow quantitative comparison of single-photon emission data across systems.

Significance. The paper addresses a genuine metrological gap: the lack of reproducible, transferable references for single-photon emission characterization. The experimental effort is substantial, with registered fiducials, two independent setups, long-term stability checks, and openly available data and analysis code. The demonstration that normalized saturation curves and g(2)(t) shapes can overlap across laboratories for one emitter is a valuable proof-of-concept. However, the statistical basis is thin: only one of six candidates proved repeatable, and the 3% repeatability figure is a same-laboratory statistic. If the claims are appropriately scoped, this is a useful contribution, but as written the portability claim exceeds what the data show.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Table 1] The central quantitative claim of "3% standard deviation in count rate at saturation" is computed from three UoM measurement sessions on emitter #B (I∞ = 52(1), 50(1), 53(2) kcps). It is not a cross-laboratory repeatability. The only NPL–UoM comparison for #B shows a large absolute offset: I∞ = 94(5) kcps at NPL versus 52(1) kcps at UoM, and I80 = 43(4) versus 23(1) kcps. The text attributes this to system throughput, but no independent calibration (e.g., a second reference emitter, a calibrated detector transfer, or measurement with identical collection optics) establishes that the emitter itself contributed nothing to the offset. The paper should state explicitly that the 3% repeatability is same-laboratory only, and temper the abstract and conclusion claims of portability accordingly.
  2. [§3, Eq. (1), Fig. S7] The protocol's core assumption is that setting pump power to 80% of the fitted saturation power produces identical internal excitation conditions across systems. The only supporting evidence is the overlapping normalized NV− saturation components for #B in Fig. S7. However, the fitted P_sat for #B varies from 43(2) to 89(5) µW across the three UoM sessions (Table 1), a factor of about two, and the normalization procedure removes the very parameter that would indicate changes in excitation rate. Moreover, Eq. (1) models the background as a strictly linear term cP; the validity of this model at high pump powers is not independently verified (e.g., against a nonlinear background or a power-dependent NV0 contribution). Demonstrating the standardization on additional emitters with different orientations, and with independent beam-profile characterization, is needed to support the claimed general reliability of the 0.8·P_sat rule.
  3. [Abstract and §4 (Conclusion)] The conclusion states that the cross-site calibration "shows that it is possible to use locally identified single NV- centers as a single-photon reference which is portable, stable and robust," and the abstract describes the nanodiamonds as "reliable, stable and robust reference sources." Of the six candidates, only four were confirmed to contain single emitters at UoM and only one (#B) showed repeatable results by the paper's own criteria. The body acknowledges this inefficiency (Section 3), but the abstract and conclusion do not. The claims should be rescaled to a proof-of-concept demonstration: a 1-in-6 success rate indicates a screening limitation that must be reported in the headline claims, and the conclusion should clearly distinguish same-laboratory repeatability (established for one emitter) from cross-laboratory portability (not established absolutely).
  4. [Fig. 3 and Supplementary §7] The mean cross-laboratory ratios I80(UoM)/I80(NPL) = 0.32(7) and Psat(UoM)/Psat(NPL) = 0.17(1) are computed from emitters #B, #C, #D, and #E. The supplementary material states that #D and #E were pumped above 0.8·P_sat at UoM to achieve sufficient SNR for g(2)(t) acquisition. Their saturation parameters were therefore measured at a different point on the saturation curve, which can bias both the count-rate ratio and the saturation-power ratio, as the authors themselves note for the bunching shoulder behavior. The throughput calibration ratio should be recomputed using only emitters measured under the stated protocol (#B and #C), or the size of the bias introduced by #D and #E should be quantified.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses "accounting for measurement conditions" while the introduction and text say "controlling for experimental conditions"; the terminology should be made consistent.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The parameters A, B, τ_ab, and τ_bunch in Eq. (2) are not all explicitly defined in the text following the equation; please define each symbol in a sentence.
  3. [Introduction] There is a typographical error in the phrase "T wo fluorescent charge states" where a line break splits "Two"; please fix.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] In the Fig. 1(b) caption, the x-axis is described as "scaled from 0 to 12 /u1D443/u1D460/u1D44E/u1D461" but the symbol does not render correctly; it should read "0 to 12·P_sat" or similar, and the same issue appears in the supplementary figure captions.
  5. [Supplementary Table S1] Item 11 is listed as "Olympus UPLFLN 60X Objective, Edmund Optics"; please verify whether the objective is an Olympus part or an Edmund Optics part, as the current listing mixes manufacturers.
  6. [Data Availability] The data availability statement gives a Figshare DOI and a GitHub repository; please check that the repository contains the analysis scripts needed to reproduce Table 1 and Fig. 3, since those are the quantitative basis of the repeatability claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One self-definitional normalization step; the central repeatability and cross-lab measurements remain direct and non-circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 3, Eq. (1) and Fig. 1(b); Supplement Sec. 5, Fig. S7]
    "C(P)=I∞P/(P+Psat)+cP ... FIG. 1(b) shows by setting pump power to 80% of Psat, we ensure that the NV− center is excited at the same rate at UoM as at NPL. ... NV saturation curves (dashed-dot) normalized to respective I_sat values closely overlap, supporting that the NV center is independently probed under the same excitation conditions."

    Under Eq. (1), the NV-emission component is I∞P/(P+Psat). After the paper's own normalization—dividing by I∞ and rescaling the power axis by Psat, as stated in Fig. 1(b): 'x-axes are scaled from 0 to 12 Psat'—this component becomes (P/Psat)/(1+P/Psat), a parameter-free universal curve. Therefore the 'closely overlap' of the fitted dashed-dot components in Fig. S7 is guaranteed by the fitting function for any center obeying Eq. (1); it is not an independent empirical test that identical internal excitation conditions are reproduced. Likewise I(0.8Psat)=0.444I∞+0.8cPsat is an algebraic consequence of the same fit, so using the overlap as support for identical excitation is self-definitional.

full rationale

The central claim—that a registered NV− nanodiamond can serve as a portable reference single-photon emitter—rests on direct measurements: the 3% repeatability in saturation count rate over three UoM sessions (I∞ = 52, 50, 53 kcps in Table 1), the stable g(2)(0) values, and the three-month photostability. The saturation model Eq. (1) and the three-level g(2) model Eq. (2) are taken from external literature (Rodiek et al.; Berthel et al.), not from the authors' prior work. The cross-laboratory I80 and I∞ ratios quantify system throughput rather than being predictions forced by the fitted parameters in a hidden way. The only circular element is the normalized saturation-curve overlap used as supporting evidence for 'same excitation conditions': after normalizing by the fitted I∞ and rescaling by the fitted Psat, the NV component of Eq. (1) is identically (P/Psat)/(1+P/Psat), so overlap is built into the model rather than empirically demonstrated. Because this is a supporting illustration and not the sole basis of the reference-standard claim, the overall circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on fitted saturation parameters (P_sat, I_inf, c) and on domain assumptions about NV- photostability and the validity of the saturation model. No new physical entities are introduced. The main ad hoc assumption is that 0.8 P_sat normalization achieves identical excitation conditions across labs; this is validated for one emitter only.

free parameters (3)
  • P_sat (saturation pump power) = 390(60) µW (NPL1); 43(2), 60(2), 89(5) µW (UoM1-3)
    Fitted from Eq. (1) to power-dependent count-rate data; defines the 0.8 P_sat operating point used for all g(2) and repeatability measurements.
  • I_inf (count rate at infinite pump power) = 94(5) kcps (NPL1); 52(1), 50(1), 53(2) kcps (UoM1-3)
    Fitted maximum count rate from Eq. (1); used to compute I_sat = I_inf/2 and normalize saturation curves.
  • c (linear background coefficient) = not reported numerically in main text
    Empirical linear laser offset term in Eq. (1) accounting for background photon flux; fitted per measurement.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption NV- centers in milled nanodiamonds are photostable with no photobleaching or intermittency over months
    Invoked to justify the 3-month repeatability claim; supported by cited refs 35, 50, 51 and by the paper's own long-duration measurements (Fig. S11).
  • domain assumption The count-rate saturation model C(P) = I_inf P/(P + P_sat) + cP (Eq. 1) fully describes NV- emission under 532 nm pumping
    Used to extract P_sat and I_inf; standard model in the NV literature (refs 29, 31, 60), but its validity at the 0.8 P_sat operating point is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper Pumping at 0.8 P_sat produces identical internal excitation conditions across different experimental systems
    Central to the calibration protocol; demonstrated for #B via overlapping normalized saturation curves (Fig. S7) but assumed to hold for other emitters and setups without further evidence.
  • domain assumption The three-level model of Eq. (2) correctly describes the measured g(2)(t) including antibunching and bunching
    Used to extract g(2)(0) values; taken from ref 53 and standard in NV photophysics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers in Nanodiamonds as Reference Single-Photon Emitters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FF7JW5VF

@misc{pith2026241115991,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers in Nanodiamonds as Reference Single-Photon Emitters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FF7JW5VF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15991}
}
abstract

Quantitative and reproducible optical characterization of single quantum emitters is crucial for quantum photonic materials research, yet controlling for experimental conditions remains challenging due to a lack of an established reference standard. We propose nanodiamonds containing single nitrogen vacancy (NV$^{-}$) color centers as reliable, stable and robust sources of single-photon emission. We select 4 potential reference emitter candidates from a study of thousands of NV$^{-}$ centers. Candidates were remeasured at a second laboratory, correlating optical pump power and NV$^{-}$ center emission intensity at saturation in addition to corresponding $g^{(2)}(0)$ values. A reference nanodiamond is demonstrated to control for experimental conditions, with reproducible and reliable single-photon emission, as a model for a new single-photon emitter reference standard.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15991 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Overlayed count rate maps of a region measured for NV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Parameters of candidate NV− centers #A-#F correlated between the two systems, NPL (red) and UoM (gray). The blue dashed line represents (2) (0) = 0.5. poor signal-to-noise ratio, which is why a subset was selected for remeasurement. An alternative would be to use defect implantation [68–72] for greater specificity over defect concentration, although these techniques are expensive in time and cost. Another approach i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ratios of parameters , and ∞ between NPL and UoM at saturation for single-photon emitting NV− centers. The error bars represent the ±1 fitting error for each center, the horizontal dashed black line indicates the mean across these four centers, and shaded regions shows the experimental ±1 standard deviation across the four centers. measurements of the single-photon emission rate. The 80 count rate ratio of 0.32(7) b… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This can be achieved using a QR code system for machine readable referencing or human-readable markers as shown in this experiment

    FIDUCIALL Y MARKED SUBSTRATES Identifying specific single objects with sizes of the order of microns to hundreds of nanometers is extremely difficult without reference markers that are invariant under rotation, translation and reflection. This can be achieved using a QR code system for machine readable referencing or human-readable markers as shown in this e...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Bright semiconductor single-photon sources pumped by heterogeneously integrated micropillar lasers with electrical injections,

    X. Li, S. Liu, Y . Wei, et al., “Bright semiconductor single-photon sources pumped by heterogeneously integrated micropillar lasers with electrical injections,” Light. Sci. & Appl. 12, 65 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Large-scale photonic natural language processing,

    C. M. Valensise, I. Grecco, D. Pierangeli, and C. Conti, “Large-scale photonic natural language processing,” Photonics Res. 10, 2846 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Single-photon emission in telecommunication band from an InAs quantum dot grown on InP with molecular-beam epitaxy,

    X. Liu, K. Akahane, N. A. Jahan, et al., “Single-photon emission in telecommunication band from an InAs quantum dot grown on InP with molecular-beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 061114 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Quantum key distribution with entangled photons generated on demand by a quantum dot,

    F. B. Basset, M. Valeri, E. Roccia, et al., “Quantum key distribution with entangled photons generated on demand by a quantum dot,” Sci. Adv. 7, 6379 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Manipulating Single-Photon Emission from Point Defects in Diamond and Silicon Carbide,

    M. E. Bathen and L. Vines, “Manipulating Single-Photon Emission from Point Defects in Diamond and Silicon Carbide,” Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots,

    L. Zhai, G. N. Nguyen, C. Spinnler, et al., “Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022 17:8 17, 829–833 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Laser writing of spin defects in nanophotonic cavities,

    A. M. Day, J. R. Dietz, M. Sutula, et al., “Laser writing of spin defects in nanophotonic cavities,” Nat. Mater. 22, 696–702 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Heterogeneous integration of spin–photon interfaces with a CMOS platform,

    L. Li, L. D. Santis, I. B. W. Harris, et al., “Heterogeneous integration of spin–photon interfaces with a CMOS platform,” Nature 630, 70–76 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Long spin coherence times of nitrogen vacancy centers in milled nanodiamonds,

    B. D. Wood, G. A. Stimpson, J. E. March, et al., “Long spin coherence times of nitrogen vacancy centers in milled nanodiamonds,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 205401 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Highly stable and pure single-photon emission with 250 ps optical coherence times in InP colloidal quantum dots,

    A. H. Proppe, D. B. Berkinsky, H. Zhu, et al., “Highly stable and pure single-photon emission with 250 ps optical coherence times in InP colloidal quantum dots,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 2023 18:9 18, 993–999 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Purification of Single Photons from Room-Temperature Quantum Dots,

    S.-W . Feng, C.- Y . Cheng, C.- Y . Wei,et al., “Purification of Single Photons from Room-Temperature Quantum Dots,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 143601 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Bright single-photon sources in bottom-up tailored nanowires,

    M. E. Reimer, G. Bulgarini, N. Akopian, et al., “Bright single-photon sources in bottom-up tailored nanowires,” Nat. Commun. 2012 3:1 3, 1–6 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Optically bright quantum dots in single nanowires,

    M. T. Borgström, V . Zwiller, E. Müller, and A. Imamoglu, “Optically bright quantum dots in single nanowires,” Nano Lett. 5, 1439–1443 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Self-assembled quantum dots in a nanowire system for quantum photonics,

    M. Heiss, Y . Fontana, A. Gustafsson, et al. , “Self-assembled quantum dots in a nanowire system for quantum photonics,” Nat. Mater. 12, 439–444 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Control of single photon emitters in semiconductor nanowires by surface acoustic waves,

    S. Lazić, A. Hernández-Mínguez, and P . V . Santos, “Control of single photon emitters in semiconductor nanowires by surface acoustic waves,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 32, 084002 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Crystal Phase Quantum Dots in the Ultrathin Core of GaAs-AlGaAs Core-Shell Nanowires,

    B. Loitsch, J. Winnerl, G. Grimaldi, et al., “Crystal Phase Quantum Dots in the Ultrathin Core of GaAs-AlGaAs Core-Shell Nanowires,” Nano Lett. 15, 7544–7551 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Colloidal quantum dots as single photon sources,

    D. Nelson, S. Byun, J. Bullock, et al., “Colloidal quantum dots as single photon sources,” J. Mater. Chem. C 12, 5684–5695 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Weakly confined organic–inorganic halide perovskite quantum dots as high-purity room-temperature single photon sources,

    B. Wang, J. W. M. Lim, S. M. Loh, et al., “Weakly confined organic–inorganic halide perovskite quantum dots as high-purity room-temperature single photon sources,” ACS Nano 18, 10807–10817 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Locally strained 2d materials: Preparation, properties, and applications,

    J. Wang, L. He, Y . Zhang, et al., “Locally strained 2d materials: Preparation, properties, and applications,” Adv. Mater. 36, 2314145 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Realization of single-photon emitters with high brightness and high stability and excellent monochromaticity,

    S. Chen, C. Wang, H. Cai, et al., “Realization of single-photon emitters with high brightness and high stability and excellent monochromaticity,” Matter 7, 1106–1116 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Activated single photon emitters and enhanced deep-level emissions in hexagonal boron nitride strain crystal,

    X. Chen, X. Yue, L. Zhang, et al., “Activated single photon emitters and enhanced deep-level emissions in hexagonal boron nitride strain crystal,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2306128 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Broadband, efficient extraction of quantum light by a photonic device comprised of a metallic nano-ring and a gold back reflector,

    C. Haws, E. Perez, M. Davanco, et al. , “Broadband, efficient extraction of quantum light by a photonic device comprised of a metallic nano-ring and a gold back reflector,” Appl. Phys. Lett 120, 81103 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Robust, tunable, and high purity triggered single photon source at room temperature using a nitrogen-vacancy defect in diamond in an open microcavity,

    S. Adekanye, H.-C. Chang, D. Hunger, et al., “Robust, tunable, and high purity triggered single photon source at room temperature using a nitrogen-vacancy defect in diamond in an open microcavity,” Opt. Express, Vol. 26, Issue 6, pp. 7056-7065 26, 7056–7065 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit,

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, et al., “Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett 68, 135–174 (1992)

    1992

  18. [26]

    Control of Quantized Spontaneous Emission from Single GaAs Quantum Dots Embedded in Huygens’ Metasurfaces,

    P . P . Iyer, S. Prescott, S. Addamane,et al., “Control of Quantized Spontaneous Emission from Single GaAs Quantum Dots Embedded in Huygens’ Metasurfaces,” Nano Lett. pp. 4749–4757 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Solid-state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel quantum materials,

    M. Esmann, S. C. Wein, and C. Antón-Solanas, “Solid-state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel quantum materials,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2315936 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence,

    R. J. Glauber, “The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence,” Phys. Rev. 130, 2529–2539 (1963)

    1963

  21. [29]

    Identifying and Mitigating Charge Instabilities in Shallow Diamond Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers,

    D. Bluvstein, Z. Zhang, and A. C. Jayich, “Identifying and Mitigating Charge Instabilities in Shallow Diamond Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 076101 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond,

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P . Delaney,et al., “The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond,” Phys. Reports 528, 1–45 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Experimental realization of an absolute single-photon source based on a single nitrogen vacancy center in a nanodiamond,

    B. Rodiek, M. Lopez, H. Hofer, et al., “Experimental realization of an absolute single-photon source based on a single nitrogen vacancy center in a nanodiamond,” Optica 4, 71 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Single-photon sources,

    B. Lounis and M. Orrit, “Single-photon sources,” Reports on Prog. Phys. 68, 1129–1179 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Single-photon sources and detectors,

    M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V . Polyakov, “Single-photon sources and detectors,” Rev. Sci. Instruments 82, 71101 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond,

    R. Brouri, A. Beveratos, J.-P . Poizat, and P . Grangier, “Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1294 (2000)

    2000

  27. [35]

    Stable Solid-State Source of Single Photons,

    C. Kurtsiefer, S. Mayer, P . Zarda, and H. Weinfurter, “Stable Solid-State Source of Single Photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 290 (2000)

    2000

  28. [36]

    Optimal conditions for NV-center formation in type-1b diamond studied using photoluminescence and positron annihilation spectroscopies,

    J. Botsoa, T. Sauvage, M.-P . Adam,et al., “Optimal conditions for NV-center formation in type-1b diamond studied using photoluminescence and positron annihilation spectroscopies,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 125209 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    Efficient production of NV colour centres in nanodiamonds using high-energy electron irradiation,

    G. Dantelle, A. Slablab, L. Rondin, et al. , “Efficient production of NV colour centres in nanodiamonds using high-energy electron irradiation,” J. Lumin. 130, 1655–1658 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Room temperature stable single-photon source,

    A. Beveratos, S. Kühn, R. Brouri, et al., “Room temperature stable single-photon source,” The Eur. Phys. J. D - At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 18, 191–196 (2002)

    2002

  31. [39]

    Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid,

    E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey, and R. V . Pound, “Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid,” Phys. Rev. 69, 37–38 (1946)

    1946

  32. [40]

    Purcell effect in active diamond nanoantennas,

    A. S. Zalogina, R. S. Savelev, E. V . Ushakova, et al., “Purcell effect in active diamond nanoantennas,” Nanoscale 10, 8721–8727 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Functionality is Key: Recent Progress in the Surface Modification of Nanodiamond,

    A. Krueger and D. Lang, “Functionality is Key: Recent Progress in the Surface Modification of Nanodiamond,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 890–906 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Sample fabrication and metrological characterization of single-photon emitters based on nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds,

    F. Hirt, J. Christinck, H. Hofer, et al., “Sample fabrication and metrological characterization of single-photon emitters based on nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds,” Eng. Res. Express 3, 045038 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Temperature dependence of charge conversion during nv-center relaxometry in nanodiamond,

    I. Cardoso Barbosa, J. Gutsche, D. Lönard, et al., “Temperature dependence of charge conversion during nv-center relaxometry in nanodiamond,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023078 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Single photon sources for quantum radiometry: a brief review about the current state-of-the-art,

    S. Kück, M. López, H. Hofer, et al., “Single photon sources for quantum radiometry: a brief review about the current state-of-the-art,” Appl. Phys. B 128, 28 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Quantum metrology of solid-state single-photon sources using photon-number-resolving detectors,

    M. von Helversen, J. Böhm, M. Schmidt, et al., “Quantum metrology of solid-state single-photon sources using photon-number-resolving detectors,” New J. Phys. 21, 035007 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Feasibility study towards comparison of the g(2)(0) measurement in the visible range,

    E. Moreva, P . Traina, R. A. Kirkwood, et al., “Feasibility study towards comparison of the g(2)(0) measurement in the visible range,” Metrologia 56, 015016 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Single defect centres in diamond: A review,

    F. Jelezko and J. Wrachtrup, “Single defect centres in diamond: A review,” Phys. Status Solidi (A) Appl. Mater. Sci. 203, 3207–3225 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    Surface modification of fluorescent nanodiamonds for biological applications,

    H.-S. Jung and K. C. Neuman, “Surface modification of fluorescent nanodiamonds for biological applications,” Nanomaterials 11 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Fluorescence lifetime control of nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds for long-term information storage,

    C. Laube, R. Temme, A. Prager, et al., “Fluorescence lifetime control of nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds for long-term information storage,” ACS Nano 17, 15401–15410 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Mass production and dynamic imaging of fluorescent nanodiamonds,

    Y .-R. Chang, H.- Y . Lee, K. Chen,et al., “Mass production and dynamic imaging of fluorescent nanodiamonds,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 284–288 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    Bright fluorescent nanodiamonds: No photobleaching and low cytotoxicity,

    S.-J. Yu, M.-W . Kang, H.-C. Chang,et al., “Bright fluorescent nanodiamonds: No photobleaching and low cytotoxicity,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 17604–17605 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Effect of surface chemistry on the fluorescence of detonation nanodiamonds,

    P . Reineck, D. W. M. Lau, E. R. Wilson, et al. , “Effect of surface chemistry on the fluorescence of detonation nanodiamonds,” ACS Nano 11, 10924–10934 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Photophysics of single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond nanocrystals,

    M. Berthel, O. Mollet, G. Dantelle, et al., “Photophysics of single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond nanocrystals,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 91, 035308 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Controlling the fluorescence properties of nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds,

    C. Laube, T. Oeckinghaus, J. Lehnert, et al., “Controlling the fluorescence properties of nitrogen vacancy centers in nanodiamonds,” Nanoscale 11, 1770–1783 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Lifetime investigation of single nitrogen vacancy centres in nanodiamonds,

    X. Li, J. Storteboom, S. Castelletto, et al., “Lifetime investigation of single nitrogen vacancy centres in nanodiamonds,” Opt. Express, Vol. 23, Issue 9, pp. 11327-11333 23, 11327–11333 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Dark States of Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond Unraveled by Single Shot NMR,

    G. Waldherr, J. Beck, M. Steiner, et al., “Dark States of Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond Unraveled by Single Shot NMR,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 157601 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Chemical control of the charge state of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,

    M. V . Hauf, B. Grotz, B. Naydenov, et al., “Chemical control of the charge state of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 081304 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Metastable dark states enable ground state depletion microscopy of nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond with diffraction-unlimited resolution,

    K. Y . Han, S. K. Kim, C. Eggeling, and S. W . Hell, “Metastable dark states enable ground state depletion microscopy of nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond with diffraction-unlimited resolution,” Nano Lett. 10, 3199–3203 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light,

    H. R. Brown and R. Q. T wiss, “Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light,” Nature 177, 27–29 (1956)

    1956

  52. [60]

    Coupling of nitrogen-vacancy centers in a nanodiamond to a silver nanocube,

    S. Kumar, S. K. Andersen, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Coupling of nitrogen-vacancy centers in a nanodiamond to a silver nanocube,” Opt. Mater. Express, Vol. 6, Issue 11, pp. 3394-3406 6, 3394–3406 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Low-temperature microscopy and spectroscopy on single defect centers in diamond,

    A. Dräbenstedt, L. Fleury, C. Tietz, et al., “Low-temperature microscopy and spectroscopy on single defect centers in diamond,” Phys. Rev. B 60, 11503 (1999)

    1999

  54. [62]

    Optimum Photoluminescence Excitation and Recharging Cycle of Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Ultrapure Diamond,

    K. Beha, A. Batalov, N. B. Manson, et al., “Optimum Photoluminescence Excitation and Recharging Cycle of Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Ultrapure Diamond,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 097404 (2012)

    2012

  55. [63]

    Photo-induced ionization dynamics of the nitrogen vacancy defect in diamond investigated by single-shot charge state detection,

    N. Aslam, G. Waldherr, P . Neumann,et al., “Photo-induced ionization dynamics of the nitrogen vacancy defect in diamond investigated by single-shot charge state detection,” New J. Phys. 15, 013064 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Metastable Dark States Enable Ground State Depletion Microscopy of Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Diamond with Diffraction-Unlimited Resolution,

    K. Y . Han, S. K. Kim, C. Eggeling, and S. W. Hell, “Metastable Dark States Enable Ground State Depletion Microscopy of Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Diamond with Diffraction-Unlimited Resolution,” Nano Lett. 10, 3199–3203 (2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    Multiple-photon excitation of nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond,

    P . Ji, R. Balili, J. Beaumariage, et al., “Multiple-photon excitation of nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 134112 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Complete determination of the orientation of NV centers with radially polarized beams,

    P . R. Dolan, X. Li, J. Storteboom, and M. Gu, “Complete determination of the orientation of NV centers with radially polarized beams,” Opt. Express 22, 4379 (2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    Photochromism in single nitrogen-vacancy defect in diamond,

    T. Gaebel, M. Domhan, C. Wittmann, et al., “Photochromism in single nitrogen-vacancy defect in diamond,” Appl. Phys. B 82, 243–246 (2006)

    2006

  60. [68]

    A High-Resolution Versatile Focused Ion Implantation Platform for Nanoscale Engineering,

    M. Adshead, M. Coke, G. Aresta, et al. , “A High-Resolution Versatile Focused Ion Implantation Platform for Nanoscale Engineering,” Adv. Eng. Mater. 25, 2300889 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Implantation of labelled single nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond using 15N,

    J. R. Rabeau, P . Reichart, G. Tamanyan, et al., “Implantation of labelled single nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond using 15N,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 1–3 (2006)

    2006

  62. [70]

    Engineering of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in high purity diamond by ion implantation and annealing,

    J. O. Orwa, C. Santori, K. M. C. Fu, et al., “Engineering of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in high purity diamond by ion implantation and annealing,” J. Appl. Phys. 109, 083530 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    Coherent Optical Transitions in Implanted Nitrogen Vacancy Centers,

    Y . Chu, N. de Leon, B. Shields, et al., “Coherent Optical Transitions in Implanted Nitrogen Vacancy Centers,” Nano Lett. 14, 1982–1986 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Generation of single color centers by focused nitrogen implantation,

    J. Meijer, B. Burchard, M. Domhan, et al., “Generation of single color centers by focused nitrogen implantation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 1–3 (2005)

    2005

  65. [73]

    Large-scale optical characterization of solid-state quantum emitters,

    M. Sutula, I. Christen, E. Bersin, et al., “Large-scale optical characterization of solid-state quantum emitters,” Nat. Mater. 22, 1338–1344 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    Scanning confocal optical microscopy and magnetic resonance on single defect centers,

    A. Gruber, A. Dräbenstedt, C. Tietz, et al., “Scanning confocal optical microscopy and magnetic resonance on single defect centers,” Science 276, 2012–2014 (1997). Nitrogen-Vacancy Colour Centers in Nanodiamonds as Reference Single-Photon Emitters: Supplemental Document

    1997

  67. [75]

    Broadband Dielectric Mirror, 400 - 750 nm 4 Thorlabs BB1-E02 Ø1

    EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMS A. NPL The NPL set-up is illustrated in Fig. S2, with the components listed in Table S1. B. UoM The NPL set-up is illustrated in FIG. S3, with the components listed in Table S2. The NDs were searched for manually using optical images from a confocal micros...

  68. [76]

    NV − CENTER IDENTIFICATION The object finding algorithm used by NPL first generates a histogram of the count rates, I, from each pixel in the 2D raster scan search (256 × 256 pixels spaced at 200 nm covering an area approximately 50 × 50 µm) , as shown by FIG. S4(a). The mode va...

  69. [77]

    HIGH-THROUGHPUT STATISTICS High-throughput data shown in FIGs. S5 and S6 highlight that although there are several NV − centers with g(2)(0) < 0.5, few are selected as candidates as a manual quality control step is applied after algorithmic identification of possible candidates...

  70. [78]

    y-values divided by respective Isat )

    NORMALIZED SATURATION CURVE FOR ND #B In figure S7, the saturation curve for ND #B is normalized to I sat (i.e. y-values divided by respective Isat ). This shows the contributions from the NV emission (dashed-dot lines) overlap well, indicating that we are probing at the same p...

  71. [79]

    The coincidence counts were binned into a histogram and normalized by the mean maximum frequency in a 1 µs window for pulses t > |1| µs

    PULSED MEASUREMENT ON ND #B To confirm the g (2)(0) value for ND #B, we measured this in the pulsed regime at room temperature using a 515 nm source pulsed at 1 MHz. The coincidence counts were binned into a histogram and normalized by the mean maximum frequency in a 1 µs windo...

  72. [80]

    A-F CANDIDATE g(2)(t) SIGNALS Overlayed g(2)(t) signals between UoM and NPL, showing that the appearance of g(2)(t) curves are identical when measured at the same point on the saturation curve (#A, #B, #C and #F). Samples #D and #E were pumped above 0.8 Psat at UoM, as their P...

    2015

  73. [81]

    PL SPECTRA FOR ND #B Power-dependent photoluminescence (PL) spectra were obtained at room temperature from a Horiba ihr550 spectrometer as shown in figure S10, showing a zero phonon line at 640 nm for ND #B

  74. [82]

    Sample stage drift is the likely cause of decreases in observed photon counts by around 10% for UoM2 and UoM3

    ND #B COUNT RATE VARIATION To assess the stability of the TTTR data acquisition, a histogram of the detected photons shown in figure S11 which shows a 5-10% variation in count rate during the course of the measurement. Sample stage drift is the likely cause of decreases in obse...

  75. [83]

    UOM 3 on 20/02/2024 This represents a 3 month period under which #B did not photodegrade upon successive measurements. 10. COMP ARISON TO LITERATURE VALUES AND OTHER SINGLE PHOTON EMITTERS A selection of values for g(2)(0), Psat and Isat are presented in Table S3. In particula...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.