Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Coherent Ising Machine Based on Polarization Symmetry Breaking in a Driven Kerr Resonator

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spontaneous polarization symmetry breaking in a fibre Kerr resonator can serve as the spin mechanism of an optical Ising machine, with intensity-only readout and hour-long stable operation.

desk verdict Polarization-SSB Kerr-resonator Ising machine: genuinely new platform with a solid hour-scale stability demo, but the exp(sqrt(N)) scaling claim is a self-fit and bias-freeness rests on an idealized, under-specified model comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16009 v1 pith:RPB2WTFB submitted 2024-11-24 physics.optics

Liam Quinn , Yiqing Xu , Julien Fatome , Gian-Luca Oppo , Stuart G. Murdoch , Miro Erkintalo , Stéphane Coen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords coherentIsingmachinepolarizationsymmetrybreakingKerrnonlinearresonatoropticalfibreringtime-multiplexedspinsspinchaincombinatorialoptimizationprotection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a new class of optical Ising machine: instead of encoding binary spins in the phase of degenerate optical parametric oscillators, it encodes them in the polarization of pulses circulating in a coherently driven optical fibre Kerr resonator. Spontaneous polarization symmetry breaking gives each pulse two equally probable alternating intensity patterns, which are read out as +1 or −1 by a simple intensity measurement. A localized birefringent defect inside the resonator is claimed to protect the system's symmetry against practical asymmetries, so spins stay unbiased without post-selection. Proof-of-concept runs on chains of up to 100 anti-ferromagnetically coupled spins ran continuously for over an hour without manual adjustment, and the scaling of time-to-solution is consistent with exp(√N). If correct, this points toward Ising machines that avoid phase stabilization and are built entirely from telecom fibre components.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a coherently driven passive Kerr fibre ring resonator with two orthogonal polarization modes, plus a localized birefringent defect (polarization controller PC2) that imparts a π phase shift every round trip. Near the tilted Kerr resonance, the undriven mode E2 is parametrically generated with two bistable phases φ0 and φ0+π; the defect swaps these phases every round trip, so the hybrid modes E±=(E1±iE2)/√2 alternate between high and low intensity. The sequence (high, low, high, low, ...) or (low, high, low, high, ...) defines spin +1 or −1, and a single photodiode measurement tells which spin was realised. Coupling between spins is implemented by measuring the instantaneous |E+|^2 of each pulse and feeding back a phase-modulated weak drive along E2, giving the Ikeda-map update $φ_i^{{(m+1)}}$ = g Σ_j J_ij |E_{+,j}^{(m)}|^2. The π-shift defect is what protects this scheme from asymmetries, converting a fragile pitchfork bifurcation into a symmetry-protected one.

What would settle it

With coupling disabled, run many single-spin trials while deliberately misaligning the input polarization or detuning PC2 from its π setting; if the probability of +1 versus −1 departs from 50/50, or if the final-energy distribution of 64-spin chains shifts measurably, the topological symmetry protection on which the bias-free claim rests has failed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports an experimental optical Ising machine in which artificial spins are carried by the polarization state of pulses in a coherently driven fibre Kerr resonator rather than by the optical phase of parametric oscillators. Because the two spin values map to two distinct alternating intensity patterns in hybrid polarization modes, readout is a direct intensity measurement, eliminating the homodyne phase detection and phase stabilization used in DOPO-based coherent Ising machines. Operating in the symmetry-protected regime introduced in the paper's reference [28], the machine ran continuously on one-dimensional anti-ferromagnetic spin chains of up to 100 spins for over an hour with no reset and no post-selection, produced final-energy distributions matching numerical simulations, and showed a time-to-solution scaling consistent with exp(√N).

Load-bearing premise

The machine is bias-free only if the single birefringent defect inside the resonator really cancels every asymmetry, including an imperfect π phase shift and a misaligned driving polarization, as claimed in the paper's earlier theoretical work; if that protection fails, the spins will prefer one state and the measured energy statistics will not represent the intended Ising problem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, Ising machines can be built without homodyne phase detection; readout becomes a photodiode intensity measurement on one hybrid polarization mode.
  • The same telecom fibre components at 1550 nm can support continuous, unattended operation for at least an hour with no post-selection, making long experiments and repeated trials routine.
  • Because each pulse is an independent spin and pulses are time-multiplexed, the number of spins is adjustable with a pulse picker; chains up to 100 spins were demonstrated.
  • Time-to-solution scales as exp(√N) for one-dimensional chains with nearest-neighbour coupling, suggesting the machine remains competitive as problem size grows, at least within the demonstrated range of N ≤ 100.
  • All-to-all coupling should be reachable by replacing the fixed delay-line feedback with established FPGA-based measurement-feedback techniques; the paper states this is readily achievable but does not demonstrate it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not pursued in the paper would be to replace the fixed optical delay lines with an FPGA-based feedback loop to implement all-to-all coupling, which the paper says is readily achievable.
  • The reported hour-long stability does not bound longer-term drift; a natural stress test is to run the machine for days while monitoring the spin-state histogram for the emergence of bias.
  • Because spin selection is seeded by noise at a pitchfork bifurcation, the same polarization-encoding scheme could double as a high-speed physical random number generator; the paper notes the connection to earlier work but does not claim this as a result of the present study.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental coherent Ising machine based on spontaneous polarization symmetry breaking in a coherently driven fibre Kerr resonator. Artificial spins are encoded in the two phases of a parametrically generated orthogonal polarization mode, and the spin state is read out by measuring the intensity of a hybridized polarization mode rather than by phase-sensitive homodyne detection. The authors demonstrate a one-dimensional antiferromagnetic chain of up to 100 time-multiplexed spins, compare 1,500-trial energy statistics with a numerical Ikeda model, report stable operation over one hour without manual adjustment or post-selection, and interpret their time-to-solution data as consistent with exp(sqrt(N)) scaling. The central experimental platform is novel and the stability data are genuinely impressive, but two load-bearing claims — bias-free operation under feedback and the exp(sqrt(N)) scaling — require stronger support than the manuscript currently provides.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable addition to the coherent Ising machine landscape: intensity-only readout, an all-fibre telecom-wavelength implementation, and long-term stability without post-selection would address well-known limitations of DOPO-based machines. The experiment is internally consistent: the 1,500-trial energy distribution, the hour-long stability measurement, the explicit statement that no trials were rejected, and the comparison with an explicit numerical model are all strengths. The main uncertainties concern whether the topological symmetry protection demonstrated in an isolated resonator in ref. 28 carries over to the coupled, feedback-driven, pulsed regime, and whether the scaling claim is an extrapolation from an in-sample fit rather than a demonstrated property. These issues are correctable with additional experiments and reanalysis, so they do not undermine the value of the platform itself.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Fig. 5; Methods, "Determination of time-to-solutions"] The exp(sqrt(N)) scaling claim is not an independent prediction: the curve is fitted to the N=10 to 56 data and then compared to the entire dataset, so the reported R^2 values are in-sample for the majority of the points. The statement in the text that the exp(sqrt(N)) curve "consistently serves as an upper bound for the data" is weak evidence, since an upper bound does not establish the functional form. Please report out-of-sample errors on the N=64, 80, and 100 points, give parameter uncertainties for the fits, and compare against a more general form such as exp(a N^b) with b free, or explicitly reframe the scaling claim as a hypothesis for future work rather than a demonstrated property of the machine.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (4); Results, Fig. 4] No direct bias measurement is reported in the coupled, feedback-driven regime. The feedback term phi_i^(m+1) = g sum_j J_ij |E_{+,j}^{(m)}|^2 (Methods Eq. 4), together with the deliberate E2 driving component, is exactly the class of symmetry-breaking perturbation that the topological protection of ref. 28 must suppress, but that protection was derived for an isolated resonator, not for the coupled machine. Agreement with the idealised Ikeda map (Eqs. 2-5) cannot certify that the physical spins are unbiased, because that model contains no imperfect pi phase shift, no polarization misalignment, and no polarization-dependent loss. A direct test would be to compare, over many trials, the frequencies of the two degenerate ground-state spin configurations of the antiferromagnetic chain, or to measure per-spin +1/-1 counts with the coupling disabled. Without such a test, the claims that the spins evolve "without unwanted biases" and that no post-selection is needed are not fully supported.
  3. [Methods, "Numerical model"] The simulated distributions used for comparison in Figs. 3c and 4a depend on parameters that are not stated: alpha, delta_0, theta, chi, g, and the noise amplitude. The text says only that "environmental noise is represented by adding weak uncorrelated white noise" without giving its strength or calibration. This makes it impossible to assess whether the "excellent agreement" in Fig. 4a is obtained with physical parameter values or with parameter tuning. Please provide a table of all model parameters and, where possible, measured values with uncertainties; also specify how the noise amplitude relates to the experimental conditions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4b] The caption says "The bars in black correspond to one standard deviation," but it is not clear whether this is the standard deviation across batches of 1,500 trials or across individual trials; please specify.
  2. [Fig. 5a] The Methods state that each time-to-solution point is derived from 1,500-4,500 runs, but the exact number of runs and the criterion for selecting the optimal annealing time (beyond locating the minimum of T_s) should be stated explicitly, including any smoothing or interpolation used.
  3. [Eq. (5)] The notation in the nonlinear coupling terms is easy to misread: please rewrite Eq. (5) with explicit mode indices, e.g., E_l^* E_{3-l}^2, and define the coefficients B and C in the text.
  4. [Fig. 3c] The inset shows "defects" in the final spin string, but the figure caption does not define how a defect is identified; please state the criterion used.
  5. [Discussion] The claim that all-to-all coupling can be "readily achieved" using FPGA-based methods is plausible but is not demonstrated here; since the present experiment is limited to a 1D chain, this sentence should be phrased as a future direction rather than as an established capability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental demonstration is self-contained and the scaling claim is explicitly a fit, not a prediction from theory.

full rationale

We walked the derivation chain. The spin states are defined via intensity measurements of hybrid modes, and the Ising energy is computed from the measured spin assignments; this is operational, not circular. The bias-free property is imported from refs 28/29, which are prior peer-reviewed works by the same group; under the given rules a prior externally falsifiable result counts as independent support, so citing it does not make the present derivation circular. The exp(sqrt(N)) scaling in Fig. 5 is explicitly obtained by fitting measured time-to-solution data over N=10 to 56 spins, then evaluated against the full dataset; the paper labels it as a fit and only cautiously says the machine 'may scale well', so it is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The numerical model (Eqs. 2 to 5) is a first-principles Ikeda map with stated physical ingredients; while parameters are not all listed, nothing in the text indicates they were tuned to reproduce the measured distribution, so the simulation comparison is not circular by construction. No equation reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration rests on the theoretical symmetry protection from the authors' prior work, on the independence of time-multiplexed pulses, and on a numerical model whose parameters are not fully reported. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Coupling gain g
    Gain applied to the electronic feedback signal in Eq. (4); controls coupling strength; value not reported, likely calibrated to match experimental data.
  • Driving polarization ellipticity χ
    Effective polarization ellipticity of the driving field set by PC4; affects coupling strength; not reported.
  • Round-trip phase detuning δ0
    Phase detuning of the E1 mode; stabilized by PID but exact value not reported; affects the bifurcation dynamics.
  • Noise amplitude
    Amplitude of the white noise added to the driving field in the numerical model; not specified; influences the probability of each spin state and hence the simulated distributions.
  • Scaling fit coefficients = not reported
    Amplitude and any offset of the exp(sqrt(N)) fit to time-to-solution data; fitted to N=10-56 data; values not disclosed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Topological symmetry protection of the polarization SSB in the presence of a localized birefringent defect (from ref. 28).
    The paper relies on this result to claim bias-free spins; it is a self-cited theory not independently re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Each intracavity pulse behaves as an independent spin; adjacent pulses do not interact.
    Methods state the 0.85 ns pulse spacing is wide enough to avoid tail interactions; this underpins the time-multiplexed network interpretation.
  • domain assumption The simplified continuous-wave Ikeda map captures the essential dynamics of the pulsed resonator.
    Methods state 'minimal differences were observed' compared to the full temporal model; this justifies the numerical simulations.
  • standard math Kerr coefficients B=2/3 and C=1/3 for linearly polarized modes.
    Standard values for linearly polarized modes in silica fiber, cited to refs. 38, 39.
  • domain assumption The white noise seeds the symmetry breaking and is weak and uncorrelated.
    Assumed in numerical model; amplitude and statistics not specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent Ising Machine Based on Polarization Symmetry Breaking in a Driven Kerr Resonator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RPB2WTFB

@misc{pith2026241116009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent Ising Machine Based on Polarization Symmetry Breaking in a Driven Kerr Resonator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RPB2WTFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16009}
}
abstract

Time-multiplexed networks of degenerate optical parametric oscillators have demonstrated remarkable success in simulating coupled Ising spins, thus providing a promising route to solving complex combinatorial optimization problems. In these systems $\unicode{x2014}$ referred to as coherent Ising machines $\unicode{x2014}$ the spins are encoded in the phases of the oscillators, and spin states are measured at the system output using phase-sensitive techniques. Here, we present an experimental demonstration of a conceptually new optical Ising machine based upon spontaneous polarization symmetry breaking within a coherently-driven optical fibre Kerr nonlinear resonator. In our scheme, the spin states are encoded using polarization, which allows the state of the network to be robustly read out using straightforward intensity measurements. Furthermore, by operating within a recently-discovered regime where the interplay between nonlinearity and topology fundamentally safeguards the system's symmetry, we ensure that our spins evolve without unwanted biases. This enables continuous Ising machine trials at optical data rates for up to an hour without resetting or manual adjustments. With an all-fibre implementation that relies solely on standard telecommunications components, we believe our work paves the way for substantial advances in the performance and stability of coherent optical Ising machines for applications ranging from financial modeling to drug discovery and machine learning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16009 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b). When the external driving field is detuned from the resonance, the intensity of the driven mode |E1| 2 is low and the undriven mode is empty, |E2| 2 ≈ 0. However, as the driving frequency is tuned towards the peak of the tilted resonance, parametric four-wave-mixing causes the undriven mode E2 to grow (Fig. 1b, red curve) with two possible phase shifts relative to the driven mode, ϕ0 and ϕπ = ϕ0 + π. 28 Furtherm… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a shows the peak hybridized intensity |E+| 2 of one of the intracavity pulses (blue curve), as the driving laser frequency is slowly swept across the SSB bifurcation point over 1,000 round trips, corresponding to 273 µs. The red curve envelope highlights the growing differential between the high and low intensity states as the bifur￾cation develops, while the inset shows the dynamics over a shorter time frame, where… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ising formulations of many NP problems

    Lucas, A. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Front. Phys. 2, 5 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    & Aspuru-Guzik, A

    Perdomo-Ortiz, A., Dickson, N., Drew-Brook, M., Rose, G. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models by quantum annealing. Sci. Rep. 2, 571 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    & Tanaka, S

    Tanahashi, K., Takayanagi, S., Motohashi, T. & Tanaka, S. Application of Ising machines and a software develop- ment for Ising machines. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 061010 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Matsubara, S., Takatsu, M., Miyazawa, T., Shibasaki, T., Watanabe, Y., Takemoto, K. & Tamura, H., Digi- tal annealer for high-speed solving of combinatorial opti- mization problems and its applications, In 2020 25th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP- DAC), pp. 667–672 (IEEE, 2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Crawford, D., Levit, A., Ghadermarzy, N., Oberoi, J. S. & Ronagh, P. Reinforcement learning using quantum Boltz- mann machines. Quantum Inf. Comput. 18, 51–74 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Wang, Z., Marandi, A., Wen, K., Byer, R. L. & Ya- mamoto, Y. Coherent Ising machine based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators. Phys. Rev. A 88, 063853 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Marandi, A., Wang, Z., Takata, K., Byer, R. L. & Ya- mamoto, Y. Network of time-multiplexed optical para- metric oscillators as a coherent Ising machine. Nature Photon. 8, 937–942 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Inagaki, T. et al. A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems. Science 354, 603–606 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    McMahon, P. L. et al. A fully programmable 100-spin coherent Ising machine with all-to-all connections.Science 354, 614–617 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    R., Renema, J

    Clements, W. R., Renema, J. J., Wen, Y. H., Chrzanowski, H. M., Kolthammer, W. S. & Walmsley, I. A. Gaussian optical Ising machines. Phys. Rev. A 96, 043850 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    & Roychowdhury, J

    Wang, T. & Roychowdhury, J. Oscillator-based Ising ma- chine. arXiv:1709.08102 [physics] (2017). 7

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    & Reinelt, G

    Barahona, F., Gr¨ otschel, M., J¨ unger, M. & Reinelt, G. An application of combinatorial optimization to statistical physics and circuit layout design. Oper. Res. 36, 493–513 (1988)

    1988

  5. [13]

    & Togawa, N., Ef- ficient Ising model mapping to solving slot placement problem, In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Con- sumer Electronics (ICCE) , (2019)

    Kanamaru, S., Oku, D., Tawada, M., Tanaka, S., Hayashi, M., Yamaoka, M., Yanagisawa, M. & Togawa, N., Ef- ficient Ising model mapping to solving slot placement problem, In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Con- sumer Electronics (ICCE) , (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    & Lechner, W

    Hauke, P., Bonnes, L., Heyl, M. & Lechner, W. Prob- ing entanglement in adiabatic quantum optimization with trapped ions. Front. Phys. 3, 21 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Pagano, G. et al. Quantum approximate optimization of the long-range Ising model with a trapped-ion quantum simulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25396–25401 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Barends, R. et al. Digitized adiabatic quantum comput- ing with a superconducting circuit. Nature 534, 222–226 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    & Herzog, W

    Chou, J., Bramhavar, S., Ghosh, S. & Herzog, W. Analog coupled oscillator based weighted Ising machine.Sci. Rep. 9, 14786 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    & Conti, C

    Pierangeli, D., Marcucci, G. & Conti, C. Large-scale pho- tonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 213902 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    S., Paik, H., Schlom, D

    Dutta, S., Khanna, A., Assoa, A. S., Paik, H., Schlom, D. G., Toroczkai, Z., Raychowdhury, A. & Datta, S. An Ising Hamiltonian solver based on coupled stochas- tic phase-transition nano-oscillators. Nature Electron. 4, 502–512 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    & Takesue, H

    Inagaki, T., Inaba, K., Hamerly, R., Inoue, K., Ya- mamoto, Y. & Takesue, H. Large-scale Ising spin network based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators.Nature Photon. 10, 415–419 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Honjo, T. et al. 100,000-spin coherent Ising machine. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh0952 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    & Inagaki, T

    Takesue, H. & Inagaki, T. 10 GHz clock time-multiplexed degenerate optical parametric oscillators for a photonic Ising spin network. Opt. Lett. 41, 4273–4276 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Hamerly, R. et al. Experimental investigation of perfor- mance differences between coherent Ising machines and a quantum annealer. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau0823 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    & Van der Sande, G

    B¨ ohm, F., Verschaffelt, G. & Van der Sande, G. A poor man’s coherent Ising machine based on opto-electronic feedback systems for solving optimization problems. Na- ture Commun. 10, 3538 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    & Wabnitz, S

    Haelterman, M., Trillo, S. & Wabnitz, S. Polarization multistability and instability in a nonlinear dispersive ring cavity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 446–456 (1994)

    1994

  18. [26]

    Garbin, B., Fatome, J., Oppo, G.-L., Erkintalo, M., Mur- doch, S. G. & Coen, S. Asymmetric balance in symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023244 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Garbin, B., Fatome, J., Oppo, G.-L., Erkintalo, M., Mur- doch, S. G. & Coen, S. Dissipative polarization domain walls in a passive coherently driven Kerr resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023904 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Coen, S., Garbin, B., Xu, G., Quinn, L., Goldman, N., Oppo, G.-L., Erkintalo, M., Murdoch, S. G. & Fatome, J. Nonlinear topological symmetry protection in a dissi- pative system. Nature Commun. 15, 1398 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    G., Coen, S

    Quinn, L., Xu, G., Xu, Y., Li, Z., Fatome, J., Murdoch, S. G., Coen, S. & Erkintalo, M. Random number gen- eration using spontaneous symmetry breaking in a Kerr resonator. Opt. Lett. 48, 3741–3744 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    M., Inoue, K

    Yamamoto, Y., Aihara, K., Leleu, T., Kawarabayashi, K.-i., Satoshi Kako, Kako, S., Fejer, M. M., Inoue, K. & Takesue, H. Coherent Ising machines—optical neural networks operating at the quantum limit. npj Quantum Inf. 3, 49 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    & Van der Sande, G

    B¨ ohm, F., Van Vaerenbergh, T., Verschaffelt, G. & Van der Sande, G. Order-of-magnitude differences in compu- tational performance of analog Ising machines induced by the choice of nonlinearity. Commun. Phys. 4, 149 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    & Berloff, N

    Syed, M. & Berloff, N. G. Physics-enhanced bifurcation optimisers: All you need is a canonical complex network. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Elec. 29, 7400406 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    & Yamamoto, Y

    Haribara, Y., Ishikawa, H., Utsunomiya, S., Aihara, K. & Yamamoto, Y. Performance evaluation of coherent Ising machines against classical neural networks. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 044002 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    & Aihara, K

    Leleu, T., Khoyratee, F., Levi, T., Hamerly, R., Kohno, T. & Aihara, K. Scaling advantage of chaotic amplitude control for high-performance combinatorial optimization. Commun. Phys. 4, 266 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    & Iwatsuki, K

    Fujiwara, M., Teshima, M., Kani, J.-i., Suzuki, H., Taka- chio, N. & Iwatsuki, K. Optical carrier supply module using flattened optical multicarrier generation based on sinusoidal amplitude and phase hybrid modulation. J. Lightwave Technol. 21, 2705–2714 (2003)

    2003

  28. [36]

    U., Garbin, B., Coen, S., Murdoch, S

    Nielsen, A. U., Garbin, B., Coen, S., Murdoch, S. G. & Erkintalo, M. Emission of intense resonant radiation by dispersion-managed Kerr cavity solitons. APL Photonics 3, 120804 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Ikeda instability and transverse effects in nonlinear ring resonators

    Haelterman, M. Ikeda instability and transverse effects in nonlinear ring resonators. Opt. Commun. 100, 389–398 (1993)

    1993

  30. [38]

    Pulse propagation in an elliptically birefrin- gent Kerr medium

    Menyuk, C. Pulse propagation in an elliptically birefrin- gent Kerr medium. IEEE J. Quantum Elec. 25, 2674– 2682 (1989)

    1989

  31. [39]

    Agrawal, G. P. Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 5th ed. (Academic Press, 2013). METHODS Resonator design Our ring resonator is built around 57 m of MetroCor single-mode fibre. The fibre has a Kerr nonlinearity coefficient γ ≈ 2.5 W −1 km−1 and it exhibits normal group-velocity dispersi...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.