Fine structure of rupture set for semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity

Wei Wang; Zhifei Zhang

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Fine structure of rupture set for semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For singular elliptic equations, the rupture set is (n−2)-rectifiable.

desk verdict Genuinely nontrivial quantitative stratification upgrade for rupture sets, but every headline conclusion is conditional on a C^{0,α} a priori bound that remains open; worth a serious referee, not an accept as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16048 v2 pith:HDV4G7LV submitted 2024-11-25 math.AP

Wei Wang , Zhifei Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35J6135J7535B6528A78

keywords semilinearellipticequationsingularnonlinearityrupturesetquantitativestratificationrectifiabilityMinkowskidimensionstationarysolutionsLorentzspaces

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies stationary solutions of the semilinear elliptic equation Δu = $u^{{-p}}$+f, whose nonlinearity blows up as u approaches zero, and asks how large and how regular the rupture set {u=0} can be. It claims that, under a priori Hölder regularity and mild integrability assumptions on f, the sublevel set {u<εr^α} inside B1 has Lebesgue measure at most $Cr^{2}$, which forces the Minkowski dimension of the rupture set to be at most n−2; that the derivatives D^j u belong to an optimal Lorentz space when f is bounded in $W^{{j−1,∞}}$; and that {u=0} is (n−2)-rectifiable, with a discrete rupture set in two dimensions. The step beyond earlier work is that the rupture set is not just small in Hausdorff dimension but has a quantitative, stratified structure: each k-stratum of points classified by the symmetry of tangent functions is k-rectifiable. This matters because a rectifiable, quantitatively controlled singular set is what one needs to study tangent behaviour, sharp integrability, and time-sliced singular sets in the associated parabolic problem.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the quantitative stratification S^k_{ε,r}(u), which collects the points where u fails to be approximately (k+1)-symmetric at every scale between r and 1. The proof pairs this with a modified blow-up sequence $r^{{-α}}$(u(x+ry)-u(x)), chosen so that points with u(x)>0 also have well-behaved limits, and with a mollified density ϑ_f(u;x,r) that admits a monotonicity formula even though it can take negative values. Because the density is not positive, the argument restricts quantitative stratification to the rupture set, where the density is bounded, and splits points into small-u and large-u cases that are handled by separate compactness and regularity arguments. This machinery produces the covering and Reifenberg-type estimates that yield both the Minkowski-content bound and the rectifiability of each stratum.

What would settle it

Exhibit an admissible stationary solution (satisfying the stated $C^{{0,α}}$, $L^{1}$, and L^q hypotheses) whose rupture set {u=0}∩B1 has upper Minkowski dimension strictly larger than n−2, or fails to be (n−2)-rectifiable; either would refute Theorem 1.7. A complementary check is to test the sharp Lorentz exponent: if some admissible solution had D^j u outside $L^{{2/(j−α),∞}}$, the claimed integrability bound would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated as Theorem 1.7, is that a stationary solution u ∈ $C^{{0,α}}$_{loc} ∩ $H^{1}$_{loc} ∩ $L^{{-p}}$_{loc} of Δu = $u^{{-p}}$+f in B4, with f ∈ L^q and uniform $L^{1}$ and L^q bounds, has a rupture set with sharp quantitative geometry. Part (1) gives L^n(B_r({u<εr^α}∩B1)) ≤ C $r^{2}$ for some ε>0, implying that the Minkowski dimension of {u=0}∩B1 is at most n−2. Part (2) states that if f ∈ $W^{{j−1,∞}}$_{loc}, then D^j u belongs to the Lorentz space $L^{{2/(j−α),∞}}$, the sharp integrability level measured against the explicit solution u(x)=$α^{{-α}}$|x|^α. Part (3) states that {u=0} is (n−2)-rectifiable and, for n=2, is discrete. The proof achieves this by stratifying the rupture set according to the symmetry of tangent functions, proving each k-stratum is k-rectifiable, and by a quantitative stratification argument that works with a modified density which may be negative.

Load-bearing premise

All of the conclusions are conditional on the solution being a priori $C^{{0,α}}$-Hölder continuous with α=2/(p+1); the paper does not prove that stationary solutions enjoy this regularity, and Remark 1.8 states that it remains an open problem whether they do.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The lower-dimensional bound is upgraded from Hausdorff dimension to Minkowski dimension: the rupture set has upper Minkowski dimension at most n−2, so its r-neighbourhood volume in B1 decays like r^2.
The rupture set is (n−2)-rectifiable: up to a null set it is covered by countably many Lipschitz images of R^{n−2}, and in dimension two it is a discrete set.
The derivative estimate D^j u ∈ L^{2/(j−α),∞} is sharp, with the model solution u(x)=α^{-α}|x|^α showing that the exponent cannot be improved.
For the three-dimensional parabolic equation ∂_t u = Δu − u^{-p} with p>3, the zero set {u(·,t)=0} is 1-rectifiable for almost every time t.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the open regularity question flagged in Remark 1.8 — whether stationary solutions are automatically C^{0,α} — is resolved positively, then Theorem 1.7 would apply to all stationary solutions in the stated class without an a priori Hölder assumption.
The sublevel estimate (1.9) says more than controlling the zero set: it controls the region where u is merely smaller than εr^α, which is a quantitative nondegeneracy statement that could bear on free-boundary and obstacle-type questions.
The framework appears transferable to other singular nonlinearities and multi-phase models whose energy densities are signed; the structural requirement is boundedness of the density on the singular set rather than positivity.
A concrete testable extension suggested by the parabolic application: for the evolution problem with p≤3, determine whether the almost-every-time slice rectifiability persists or fails; the paper leaves this parameter range open.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know: this paper makes a real advance—quantitative stratification applied to a density that can be negative, yielding a sharp Minkowski estimate and rectifiability of the rupture set—but all of Theorem 1.7 is conditional on a C^{0,α} a priori bound that is still an open problem. That is not a dishonest paper; Remark 1.8 says it plainly. But it means the title's “stationary solutions” overshoots what is proved.

What is genuinely new: the modification of the blow-up to u−u(x), the alternative Lemma 6.13 dealing with points where u(x)>0, the mollified density and monotonicity formula, and the first optimal Lorentz-space integrability for D^j u. The argument is long but structured. The classical stratification part is careful, and the quantitative part follows Naber–Valtorta with nontrivial changes. The parabolic slicing corollary is a nice byproduct, though it inherits the same a priori regularity assumption.

Soft spots, in proportion: - The main theorem does not apply to all stationary solutions. Proposition 3.22 does not prove Hölder regularity from weaker assumptions; it takes C^{0,α} as input. The stress-test gets this right. If the a priori Hölder problem is solved later, the theorem becomes unconditional; until then, treat Theorem 1.7 as “for stationary solutions in C^{0,α}.” - Theorem 1.7(2) is not proved in the stated generality. Section 10.2 treats only j=1, f=0, and the general case is deferred with “almost the same argument.” For a paper of this length, that is an unnecessary gap. - The tangent-symmetry conclusion used for rectifiability (Theorem 5.8(3)) leans on “methods in [47]” plus the authors’ own unpublished preprint [24]. This is load-bearing delegation. It may be repairable, but the referee should not have to chase an unpublished source. - The dependence on [24] is understandable—self-citation is not by itself a flaw—but here the cited result is not externally reproduced.

For whom: specialists in quantitative stratification and singular sets of elliptic free-boundary-type problems. They will get value from the techniques even if the theorem is conditional.

Recommendation: send it to a serious referee. I would not accept as is. Ask the authors to either prove the general j case and import the [24] argument into the paper, or reword the theorem so the a priori assumption is explicit in the statement rather than only in remarks. The core mathematics looks sound and important enough to keep in the pipeline.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies stationary solutions of the singular semilinear elliptic equation Δu = u^{-p} + f, u ≥ 0 in Ω ⊂ R^n, under the standing hypothesis u ∈ C^{0,α}_{loc}, α = 2/(p+1). The main theorem, Theorem 1.7, asserts three conclusions: (1) the Minkowski-type volume estimate L^n(B_r({u < ε r^α} ∩ B_1)) ≤ C r^2, which implies that the Minkowski dimension of {u = 0} is at most n − 2; (2) optimal Lorentz-space integrability D^j u ∈ L^{2/(j−α),∞} when f ∈ W^{j−1,∞}; and (3) (n−2)-rectifiability of the rupture set, which is discrete when n = 2. The proof develops a mollified density ϑ_f, a monotonicity formula, compactness and blow-up analysis, classical stratification à la White, quantitative stratification in the style of Naber–Valtorta, Reifenberg-type theorems, L^2 best-approximation estimates, and covering lemmas, and culminates in Theorem 5.8 and Theorem 1.7. A parabolic application, Theorem 1.12, gives 1-rectifiability of the rupture set for almost every time slice in n = 3, p > 3, for suitable weak solutions that are a priori Hölder.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it constitutes a substantial improvement over the earlier Hausdorff-dimension bounds for rupture sets obtained in [12, 18, 29, 13]: it gives quantitative Minkowski-content control and rectifiability of the rupture set, and it upgrades the integrability of derivatives to the expected Lorentz spaces. The technical apparatus contains genuinely useful ideas: a mollified density adapted to a density that can take negative values, a blow-up based on u − u(x) rather than u itself, and a quantitative stratification framework that avoids the nonnegativity assumptions used for harmonic maps. The paper is careful and detailed in its main estimates, and I did not find a definite internal contradiction in §§2–9. However, the correctness risk is concentrated in three places: the proof of Theorem 1.7(2) is only carried out for j = 1 and f ≡ 0; the H^k-a.e. tangent-symmetry conclusion in Theorem 5.8(3) relies on imported arguments from the authors' unpublished preprint [24]; and the whole theorem is conditional on the a priori Hölder regularity assumption, as the authors themselves state in Remark 1.8.

major comments (4)

[§10.2, proof of Theorem 1.7(2)] The proof of (1.10) is presented only for the case j = 1 and f ≡ 0; the text says that 'the general case follows from almost the same argument'. This is not a proof for a stated main theorem. The Lorentz-space integrability for arbitrary j and for nonvanishing f ∈ W^{j−1,∞} is one of the three central claims of Theorem 1.7, so the missing argument must either be supplied in full or the theorem must be restricted to the proved case.
[§10.1, proof of Theorem 5.8(3)] The H^k-a.e. statement that tangent functions are k-symmetric with respect to a fixed subspace is obtained by 'almost the same methods in the proof of Theorem 1.4 and 1.5 of [47]' and by 'similar arguments in [24]', where [24] is an unpublished preprint by the same authors. This tangent-symmetry property is load-bearing for the rectifiability of the strata and hence of {u = 0}. The manuscript should contain a complete, self-contained proof, or at minimum should delineate precisely which steps are imported from [24] and make the preprint available and verifiable.
[§3.3.2, Proposition 3.22, and Remark 1.8] Proposition 3.22 is used in §10.2 to pass from the hypotheses of Theorem 1.7 to the uniform bound (5.6), but its statement already assumes u ∈ C^{0,α}_{loc}. It therefore proves a uniform Hölder estimate only within the class of solutions that are already known to be α-Hölder; it does not prove Hölder regularity for arbitrary stationary solutions. Since Remark 1.8 explicitly leaves that regularity as an open problem, all conclusions of Theorems 1.7 and 1.12 are conditional on an a priori Hölder assumption. The abstract and introduction should state this conditionality prominently and should not imply that the fine-structure theorems apply to all stationary solutions of (1.1).
[§10.2, Remark 1.9 and the 'sharpness' paragraph] The claim that the estimates are sharp is justified only by the two-dimensional radial example (1.5). For n > 2 this example has a point rupture set and does not by itself demonstrate that the exponent 2 in (1.9) is optimal. Sharpness for n > 2 presumably follows from the trivial extension construction in Lemma 4.10, but this is not explicitly stated; the sharpness discussion should be made precise.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] The abstract says the paper studies 'stationary solutions' without mentioning the standing a priori assumption u ∈ C^{0,α}_{loc}; this should be stated in the abstract to avoid overstating the scope.
[§10.2, beginning] The sentence 'By Proposition 3.22 and Lemma A.2, without loss of generality, we can assume...' should explain the scaling/restriction that turns the L^1(B_2) + L^q(B_2) bound in Theorem 1.7 into the stronger local Morrey-plus-Hölder bound used later.
[§5.1, Definition 5.5] The definition of S^k_{ε,r}(u) restricts to x ∈ B_{R_0} with r ≤ s < 1, but several later statements use balls B_s(x) that leave B_{4R_0}; the domain conventions for all radii should be listed once to avoid ambiguity.
[§6.2, Lemma 6.4] The proof of Lemma 6.4 uses compactness and Proposition 3.1, but the statement allows s = 1 with B_{20}(x) and requires an L^2-type bound; the role of Lemma 2.1 in providing that bound should be cited explicitly at the point where sup_i ‖u_i‖_{L^2} is asserted.
[§10.1, rectifiability argument] The phrase 'repeating this procedure to S for countably times' should be expanded: the argument produces, for each σ, a subset F of S of large H^k-measure that is rectifiable; the countable iteration needed to cover H^k-almost all of S should be written out.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quantitative stratification results are proved in the text from the standing C^{0,\alpha} hypothesis and external [47] machinery; the same-author preprint [24] is used only as a supplementary 'similar arguments' pointer, not as a load-bearing reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, I find no circular reduction. Theorem 1.7 explicitly assumes u in C^{0,\alpha}_{loc}, and Proposition 3.22 is used only to convert the L1+Lq normalization into a uniform C^{0,\alpha} bound under that standing hypothesis; the conditional nature is openly stated in Remark 1.8 ('The results in this theorem are a priori since we assume that the solution is in C^{0,\alpha}_{loc}'). This limits the scope of the theorem but does not feed a conclusion back into a hypothesis. The quantitative stratification estimates (Theorem 5.8) are proved in Sections 6-10 from the monotonicity formula (Proposition 2.16), whose proof is written out, and from published external tools (Reifenberg-type theorems of [47], rectifiability criteria of [1], classical stratification of [67]). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no conclusion is equivalent to an input by construction. The only same-author citation is the unpublished preprint [24]; it appears as 'also see [24] for similar arguments' in the proof of Theorem 5.8(3) and as an additional reference for the monotonicity formula, while the actual arguments are either contained in the text or attributed to the published external works [47] and [27]. This is a minor self-citation, not a load-bearing reduction. The a priori Holder caveat is a genuine open-problem limitation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new entities are postulated. The paper rests on standard geometric measure theorems, on prior structural results for tangent functions from [12], on the explicit a priori Hölder assumption, and on parts of the authors' own unpublished preprint [24].

assumptions (5)

domain assumption A priori Hölder regularity u ∈ C^{0,α}_{loc} is assumed in Theorem 1.7 and Theorem 1.12; it is not derived from the other hypotheses.
Remark 1.8 states that Hölder continuity of stationary solutions is an open problem. The quantitative stratification and compactness arguments require a uniform C^{0,α} bound, so the main theorem only applies to solutions that already have this regularity.
domain assumption Lemma 4.9 ([12], Lemmas 5.8 and 5.10): for any 0-symmetric stationary solution h of Δh=h^{-p}, the set Σ(h)={x:ϑ(h;x)=ϑ(h;0)} is a subspace and h is invariant with respect to Σ(h); for n=2, {h=0} is a single point.
Used in Lemma 4.13 and Lemma 4.14 to identify the top stratum with {u=0} and to control stratum dimensions.
standard math Theorem 7.2 ([47], Theorem 3.4), the Reifenberg-type estimate for discrete measures, and Theorem 7.5 ([1], Corollary 1.3), the Jones square function rectifiability criterion.
These geometric measure theory results are imported and are essential to the covering lemmas in §9 and the rectifiability proof in §10.1.
domain assumption Lemma 4.10 ([12], Lemma 5.9): the trivial extension of a stationary solution in R^k to R^n is stationary if and only if the original solution is stationary.
Used in Lemma 4.13 to reduce the behavior of (n-1)-symmetric tangent functions to a two-dimensional problem.
ad hoc to paper The self-cited preprint [24] supplies parts of the quantitative stratification framework, including 'similar arguments' for the H^k-a.e. tangent symmetry in Theorem 5.8(3), and the paper does not reproduce or verify those steps.
Section 10.1 explicitly refers to [24] for 'similar arguments'. Since [24] is an unpublished preprint by two of the same authors, the reader cannot check those imported steps from the present text.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fine structure of rupture set for semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HDV4G7LV

@misc{pith2026241116048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fine structure of rupture set for semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HDV4G7LV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16048}
}

abstract

In this paper, we study the stationary solutions of semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity $$ \Delta u=u^{-p}+f,\,\,u\geq 0\text{ in }\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n, $$ where $ n\geq 2 $, $ p>1 $, $ \Omega $ is a bounded domain, and $ f\in L^q(\Omega) $ with $ \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2p}<\frac{q}{n} $. We establish a sharp estimate for the Minkowski content of the rupture set $ \{u=0\} $ and demonstrate that this set is $ (n-2) $-rectifiable. For this, we examine the stratification of the rupture set based on the symmetry properties of tangent functions, leading to the proof of $ k $-rectifiability for each $ k $-stratum. As a significant byproduct of our analysis, we improve the integrability of $ D^ju $ with $ j\in\mathbb{Z}_+ $ to the optimal Lorentz space $ L^{\frac{2(p+1)}{j(p+1)-2},\infty} $, under the assumption that $ D^{j-1}f $ is bounded. As an application of our results in the static case of the equation, for a class of suitable weak solutions to the three-dimensional evolutional problem $$ \partial_tu=\Delta u-u^{-p},\,\,u\geq 0\text{ in }(\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^3)\times(0,T), $$ where $ p>3 $ and $ T>0 $, we show that $ \{u(\cdot,t)=0\} $ is $ 1 $-rectifiable for a.e. $ t\in(0,T) $.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

[47]

Naber and D

A. Naber and D. Valtorta, Rectiﬁable-Reifenberg and th e regularity of stationary and minimizing harmonic maps, Annals of Mathematics , 85 (2017), 131-227

work page 2017
[24]

H. Fu, W. Wang, and Z. Zhang, Quantitative stratiﬁcatio n and sharp regularity estimates for supercritical semilinear elliptic equations, arXiv preprint, arXiv:240 8.06726

work page
[1]

Azzam and X

J. Azzam and X. Tolsa, Characterization of n-rectiﬁability in terms of Jones’ square function: Part II, Geometric and Functional Analysis , 25 (2015), 1371-1412

work page 2015
[2]

Alper, Rectiﬁability of line defects in liquid crysta ls with variable degree of orientation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 228 (2018), 309-339

O. Alper, Rectiﬁability of line defects in liquid crysta ls with variable degree of orientation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 228 (2018), 309-339

work page 2018
[3]

Alper, On the singular set of free interface in an optim al partition problem, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 73 (2020), 855-915

O. Alper, On the singular set of free interface in an optim al partition problem, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 73 (2020), 855-915

work page 2020
[4]

Bertozzi and M.C

A.L. Bertozzi and M.C. Pugh, Long-wave instabilities an d saturation in thin ﬁlm equations, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 51 (1998), 625-661

work page 1998
[5]

Bertozzi and M.C

A.L. Bertozzi and M.C. Pugh, Finite-time blow-up of solu tions of some long-wave unstable thin ﬁlm equations, Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 49 (2000), 1323-1366

work page 2000
[6]

Bethuel, On the singular set of stationary harmonic ma ps, Manuscripta Mathematica , 78 (1993), 417-443

F. Bethuel, On the singular set of stationary harmonic ma ps, Manuscripta Mathematica , 78 (1993), 417-443

work page 1993

Show all 67 references

[7]

Caﬀarelli, The obstacle problem revisited, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 4 (1998), 383-402

L. Caﬀarelli, The obstacle problem revisited, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 4 (1998), 383-402

1998
[8]

Cheeger and A

J. Cheeger and A. Naber, Lower bounds on Ricci curvature a nd quantitative behavior of singular sets, Inven- tiones mathematicae , 191 (2013), 321-339

2013
[9]

Cheeger and A

J. Cheeger and A. Naber, Quantitative stratiﬁcation and the regularity of harmonic maps and minimal currents, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 66 (2013), 965-990

2013
[10]

Cheeger, R

J. Cheeger, R. Haslhofer and A. Naber, Quantitative str atiﬁcation and the regularity of mean curvature ﬂow, Geometric and Functional Analysis , 23 (2013), 828-847

2013
[11]

Cheeger, R

J. Cheeger, R. Haslhofer, and A. Naber, Quantitative st ratiﬁcation and the regularity of harmonic map ﬂow, Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 53 (2015), 365-381

2015
[12]

D´ avila, K

J. D´ avila, K. Wang, and J. Wei, Qualitative analysis of rupture solutions for a MEMS problem, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C. Analyse Non Lin´ eaire, 33 (2016), 221-242

2016
[13]

D´ avila and A

J. D´ avila and A. Ponce, Hausdorﬀ dimension of ruptures sets and removable singularities, Comptes Rendus Math´ ematique. Acad´ emie des Sciences. Paris, 346 (2008), 27-32

2008
[14]

D´ avila and J

J. D´ avila and J. Wei, Point ruptures for a MEMS equation with fringing ﬁeld, Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 37 (2012), 1462-1493

2012
[15]

De Lellis, A

C. De Lellis, A. Marchese, E. Spadaro, and D. Valtorta, R ectiﬁability and upper Minkowski bounds for singu- larities of harmonic Q-valued maps, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici , 93 (2018), 737-779

2018
[16]

del Pino and G

M. del Pino and G. E. Hernandez, Solvability of the Neuma nn Problem in a Ball for − ∆ u + u−ν = h(|x|), journal of diﬀerential equations , 124 (1996) 108-131

1996
[17]

Du and Z

Y. Du and Z. Guo, Positive solutions of an elliptic equat ion with negative exponent: stability and critical power, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations 246 (2009), 2387-2414

2009
[18]

Dupaigne, A

L. Dupaigne, A. Ponce, and A. Porretta, Elliptic equati ons with vertical asymptotes in the nonlinear term. Journal d’Analyse Math´ ematique, 98 (2006), 349-396

2006
[19]

Edelen and M

N. Edelen and M. Engelstein, Quantitative stratiﬁcati on for some free-boundary problems, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 371 (2019), 2043-2072

2019
[20]

Esposito, N

P. Esposito, N. Ghoussoub, and Y. Guo, Mathematical ana lysis of partial diﬀerential equations modeling electrostatic MEMS, American Mathematical Society, 2010

2010
[21]

L. C. Evans, Partial regularity for stationary harmoni c maps into spheres, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 116 (1991), 203-218

1991
[22]

Figalli and J

A. Figalli and J. Serra, On the ﬁne structure of the free b oundary for the classical obstacle problem, Inventiones Mathematicae, 215 (2019), 311-366

2019
[23]

Figalli, X

A. Figalli, X. Ros-Oton, and J. Serra, Generic regulari ty of free boundaries for the obstacle problem, Publications Math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, 132 (2020), 181-292

2020
[25]

Giaquinta and L

M. Giaquinta and L. Martinazzi, An introduction to the r egularity theory for elliptic systems, harmonic maps and minimal graphs, Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2005. SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATION WITH SINGULAR NONLINEARITIE S 79

2005
[26]

H. Guo, Z. Guo, and K. Li, Positive solutions of a semilin ear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity, Journal of mathematical analysis and applications , 323 (2006), 344-359

2006
[27]

Guo and J

Z. Guo and J. Wei, Hausdorﬀ dimension of ruptures for sol utions of a semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity, Manuscripta Mathematica , 120 (2006), 193-209

2006
[28]

Guo and J

Z. Guo and J. Wei, Symmetry of non-negative solutions of a semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlin- earity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mat hematics, 137 (2007), 963-994

2007
[29]

Guo and J

Z. Guo and J. Wei, Asymptotic behavior of touch-down sol utions and global bifurcations for an elliptic problem with a singular nonlinearity Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis , 7 (2008), 765-786

2008
[30]

Han and F

Q. Han and F. Lin, Elliptic partial diﬀerential equatio ns, American Mathematical Society, 2011

2011
[31]

Hirsch, S

J. Hirsch, S. Stuvard, and D. Valtorta, Rectiﬁability o f the singular set of multiple-valued energy minimizing harmonic maps, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 371 (2019), 4303-4352

2019
[32]

Jiang and F

H. Jiang and F. Lin, Zero set of Sobolev functions with ne gative power of integrability, Chinese Annals of Mathematics. Series B , 25 (2004), 65-72

2004
[33]

Laugesen and M

R.S. Laugesen and M. C. Pugh. Properties of steady state s for thin ﬁlm equations, European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 11 (2000), 293-351

2000
[34]

Laugesen and M.C

R.S. Laugesen and M.C. Pugh, Linear stability of steady states for thin ﬁlm and Cahn-Hilliard type equations, Archive for rational mechanics and analysis , 154 (2000), 3-51

2000
[35]

Lauren¸ cot and C

P. Lauren¸ cot and C. Walker. Some singular equations mo deling MEMS, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 54 (2017), 437-479

2017
[36]

K. Li, H. Guo, and Z. Guo, Positive single rupture soluti ons to a semilinear elliptic equation, Applied mathe- matics letters , 18 (2005), 1177-1183

2005
[37]

Lin, Gradient estimates and blow-up analysis for sta tionary harmonic maps, Annals of Mathematics

F. Lin, Gradient estimates and blow-up analysis for sta tionary harmonic maps, Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, 149 (1999), 785-829

1999
[38]

Lin and C

F. Lin and C. Wang, Harmonic and quasi-harmonic spheres , Communications in Analysis and Geometry , 7 (1999), 397-429

1999
[39]

Lin and C

F. Lin and C. Wang, Harmonic and quasi-harmonic spheres , Part III, rectiﬁability of the parabolic defect measure and generalized varifold ﬂows, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar` e C , 19 (2002), 209-259

2002
[40]

Lin and C

F. Lin and C. Wang, The analysis of harmonic maps and thei r heat ﬂows, World Scientiﬁc Publishing, Hack- ensack, 2008

2008
[41]

Ma and J

L. Ma and J. Wei, Properties of positive solutions to an e lliptic equation with negative exponent, Journal of Functional Analysis, 254 (2008), 1058-1087

2008
[42]

Meadows, Stable and singular solutions of the equa tion ∆ u = 1 /u, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 53 (2004), 1681-1703

A.M. Meadows, Stable and singular solutions of the equa tion ∆ u = 1 /u, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 53 (2004), 1681-1703

2004
[43]

Mi´ skiewicz, Discrete Reifenberg-type theorem, Annales AcademiæScientiarum Fennicæ

M. Mi´ skiewicz, Discrete Reifenberg-type theorem, Annales AcademiæScientiarum Fennicæ. Mathematica , 43 (2018), 3-19

2018
[44]

Moser, Regularity for the approximated harmonic map equation and application to the heat ﬂow for harmonic maps, Mathematische Zeitschrift , 243, (2003) 263-289

R. Moser, Regularity for the approximated harmonic map equation and application to the heat ﬂow for harmonic maps, Mathematische Zeitschrift , 243, (2003) 263-289

2003
[45]

Moser, Partial regularity for harmonic maps and rela ted problems, World Scientiﬁc, 2005

R. Moser, Partial regularity for harmonic maps and rela ted problems, World Scientiﬁc, 2005

2005
[46]

Naber, Lecture notes on rectiﬁable Reifenberg for me asures, Harmonic analysis and applications, IAS/Park City Math

A. Naber, Lecture notes on rectiﬁable Reifenberg for me asures, Harmonic analysis and applications, IAS/Park City Math. Ser , 27 (2020), 289-345

2020
[48]

Naber and D

A. Naber and D. Valtorta, Stratiﬁcation for the singula r set of approximate harmonic maps, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 290 (2018), 1415-1455

2018
[49]

Naber and D

A. Naber and D. Valtorta, Energy identity for stationar y harmonic maps, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02242 , (2024)

2024 arXiv
[50]

A. H. Nayfeh, M. I. Younis, and E. M. Abdel-Rahman, Reduc ed-order models for MEMS applications, Nonlinear dynamics, 41 (2005), 211-236

2005
[51]

Pacard, Partial regularity for weak solutions of a no nlinear elliptic equation, Manuscripta Mathematica , 79 (1993), 161-172

F. Pacard, Partial regularity for weak solutions of a no nlinear elliptic equation, Manuscripta Mathematica , 79 (1993), 161-172

1993
[52]

Pelesko and D

J. Pelesko and D. Bernstein, Modeling MEMS and NEMS, CRC press, 2002

2002
[53]

Phillips, A minimization problem and the regularity of solutions in the presence of a free boundary, Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 32 (1983), 1-17

D. Phillips, A minimization problem and the regularity of solutions in the presence of a free boundary, Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 32 (1983), 1-17

1983
[54]

Preiss, Geometry of measures in Rn: distribution, rectiﬁability, and densities, Annals of Mathematics

D. Preiss, Geometry of measures in Rn: distribution, rectiﬁability, and densities, Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, 125 (1987), 537-643

1987
[55]

E. R. Reifenberg, Solution of the Plateau problem for m-dimensional surfaces of varying topological type, Acta Mathematica, 104 (1960), 1-92

1960
[56]

Simon, Rectiﬁability of the singular set of energy mi nimizing maps, Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 3 (1995), 1-65

L. Simon, Rectiﬁability of the singular set of energy mi nimizing maps, Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 3 (1995), 1-65. 80 WEI W ANG AND ZHIFEI ZHANG

1995
[57]

Sinaei, Convex functionals and the stratiﬁcation of the singular set of their stationary points, Advances in Mathematics, 338 (2018), 502-548

Z. Sinaei, Convex functionals and the stratiﬁcation of the singular set of their stationary points, Advances in Mathematics, 338 (2018), 502-548

2018
[58]

Simon, Theorems on regularity and sigularity of ener gy minimizing maps, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, 1996

L. Simon, Theorems on regularity and sigularity of ener gy minimizing maps, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, 1996

1996
[59]

Soave and S

N. Soave and S. Terracini, The nodal set of solutions to s ome elliptic problems: singular nonlinearities, Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 128 (2019), 264-296

2019
[60]

Tavares and S

H. Tavares and S. Terracini, Regularity of the nodal set of segregated critical conﬁgurations under a weak reﬂection law, Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 45 (2012), 273-317

2012
[61]

Schoen and K

R. Schoen and K. Uhlenbeck, A regularity theory for harm onic maps, Journal of Diﬀerential Geometry , 17 (1982), 307-335

1982
[62]

Vedovato, Quantitative regularity for p-minimizin g maps through a Reifenberg theorem, The Journal of Geometric Analysis, 31 (2021), 8271-8317

M. Vedovato, Quantitative regularity for p-minimizin g maps through a Reifenberg theorem, The Journal of Geometric Analysis, 31 (2021), 8271-8317

2021
[63]

Wang, Partial regularity of stable solutions to the s upercritical equations and its applications, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 75 (2012), 5238-5260

K. Wang, Partial regularity of stable solutions to the s upercritical equations and its applications, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 75 (2012), 5238-5260

2012
[64]

Wang and G

K. Wang and G. Yi, Blow up analysis for a parabolic MEMS pr oblem, I: H¨ older estimate,Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 63 (2024), 193-226

2024
[65]

Wang, Quantitative stratiﬁcation of stationary con nections, Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathe- matik, 775 (2021), 39-69

Y. Wang, Quantitative stratiﬁcation of stationary con nections, Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathe- matik, 775 (2021), 39-69

2021
[66]

G. S. Weiss, A homogeneity improvement approach to the o bstacle problem, Inventiones Mathematicae , 138 (1999), 23-50

1999
[67]

White, Stratiﬁcation of minimal surfaces, mean curv ature ﬂows, and harmonic maps, Journal f¨ ur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik , 488 (1997), 1-35

B. White, Stratiﬁcation of minimal surfaces, mean curv ature ﬂows, and harmonic maps, Journal f¨ ur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik , 488 (1997), 1-35. School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beiji ng 100871, China Email address : 2201110024@stu.pku.edu.cn Scho...

1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [47]

Naber and D

A. Naber and D. Valtorta, Rectiﬁable-Reifenberg and th e regularity of stationary and minimizing harmonic maps, Annals of Mathematics , 85 (2017), 131-227

work page 2017

[2] [24]

H. Fu, W. Wang, and Z. Zhang, Quantitative stratiﬁcatio n and sharp regularity estimates for supercritical semilinear elliptic equations, arXiv preprint, arXiv:240 8.06726

work page

[3] [1]

Azzam and X

J. Azzam and X. Tolsa, Characterization of n-rectiﬁability in terms of Jones’ square function: Part II, Geometric and Functional Analysis , 25 (2015), 1371-1412

work page 2015

[4] [2]

Alper, Rectiﬁability of line defects in liquid crysta ls with variable degree of orientation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 228 (2018), 309-339

O. Alper, Rectiﬁability of line defects in liquid crysta ls with variable degree of orientation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 228 (2018), 309-339

work page 2018

[5] [3]

Alper, On the singular set of free interface in an optim al partition problem, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 73 (2020), 855-915

O. Alper, On the singular set of free interface in an optim al partition problem, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 73 (2020), 855-915

work page 2020

[6] [4]

Bertozzi and M.C

A.L. Bertozzi and M.C. Pugh, Long-wave instabilities an d saturation in thin ﬁlm equations, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 51 (1998), 625-661

work page 1998

[7] [5]

Bertozzi and M.C

A.L. Bertozzi and M.C. Pugh, Finite-time blow-up of solu tions of some long-wave unstable thin ﬁlm equations, Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 49 (2000), 1323-1366

work page 2000

[8] [6]

Bethuel, On the singular set of stationary harmonic ma ps, Manuscripta Mathematica , 78 (1993), 417-443

F. Bethuel, On the singular set of stationary harmonic ma ps, Manuscripta Mathematica , 78 (1993), 417-443

work page 1993