Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Radiation Pattern Synthesis with Uniform Nonlocal Metasurfaces

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Radiation patterns can be deliberately shaped by a uniform, unmodulated metasurface whose nonlocal surface impedance is tailored as a function of tangential wave vector.

desk verdict Uniform nonlocal metasurfaces can shape radiation patterns, and the paper's evidence is real, but the surface-wave-avoidance criterion is likely sign-inverted and needs fixing before the analytical route is trustworthy. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16210 v1 pith:AVRZZ5MJ submitted 2024-11-25 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Alexander Zhuravlev , Yury Kurenkov , Xuchen Wang , Fedor Dushko , Viktor Zalipaev , Stanislav Glybovski This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords nonlocalmetasurfacessurfaceimpedancesynthesisspatialdispersionradiationpatternengineeringhigh-impedanceelectromagneticmagneticlinesourceloadedviasreflectionregime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the radiation pattern of a line source can be reshaped by an unmodulated, spatially dispersive (nonlocal) metasurface acting as a reflector, with no spatial modulation of its meta-atoms. It shows analytically that tailoring a rational nonlocal surface impedance as a function of tangential wave vector gives control over the phase of each reflected plane-wave harmonic, and hence over the far-field pattern. Three target shapes — a flat-topped beam, a secant-shaped beam, and a beam with nulls at chosen angles — are then realized with a mushroom-type high-impedance surface whose vias are loaded with inductive elements, and confirmed by full-wave simulation and one experiment. If the principle holds, antenna reflectors become much simpler to fabricate, because all meta-atoms are identical and the source can be translated parallel to the surface without altering the pattern.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rational nonlocal surface impedance $Z_s(\gamma) = jX (1 - A\gamma^2)/(1 - B\gamma^2)$ (Eq. (2)), whose coefficients $X$, $A$, and $B$ encode the impedance at normal incidence, the angular position of its zero, and the angular position of its pole. This impedance enters the reflection coefficient (6), which feeds into the far-field expression (11), $H^{\mathrm{tot}} \propto 1 - \rho(\theta)e^{-jk2h\cos\theta}$, the quantity compared with the target pattern. The argument is carried by the closed-form homogenization expressions (A1)–(A2) linking $X, A, B$ to the physical dimensions and load inductance of the mushroom-type high-impedance surface, and by the surface-wave-avoidance condition on the roots of (7), which justifies omitting residue terms in the steepest-descent evaluation.

What would settle it

Compute the full inverse Fourier transform (9) without omitting residue terms for the three coefficient sets in Table I and compare with the steepest-descent formula (11); if the residue contributions are non-negligible for any set, the surface-wave-avoidance condition is insufficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that reflection from a uniform, unmodulated metasurface can implement a desired radiation pattern provided the surface impedance is made deliberately nonlocal, i.e., dependent on the tangential wave vector $\gamma$. For a magnetic line current at height $h$, the total far field reduces to $H^{\mathrm{tot}} \propto 1 - \rho(\theta) e^{-j k 2 h \cos\theta}$, where the reflection coefficient $\rho(\theta)$ is fixed by the rational impedance $Z_s(\gamma) = jX (1 - A\gamma^2)/(1 - B\gamma^2)$. By choosing the three real coefficients $X, A, B$ — and realizing them in a mushroom-type high-impedance surface with loaded vias — the authors show that flat, secant, and nulled patterns can be approximated. The numerically calculated radiation patterns reproduce the main features of the target shapes, and a fabricated sample confirms the secant pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The method relies on a sign condition for the roots of the surface-wave equation to ensure that no surface waves are excited; if that condition is inverted or incomplete, surface waves could alter the radiation pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A reflector's meta-atoms can all be identical, removing the need for point-by-point spatial modulation and simplifying printed-circuit-board fabrication.
  • The source can be moved parallel to the metasurface without changing the radiation pattern, since only its height enters the far-field formula.
  • Three practically relevant pattern shapes (flat-topped, secant, and nulled beams) can be produced with only three real coefficients $X, A, B$.
  • The derived surface-wave-avoidance condition, when satisfied, suppresses edge-diffraction artifacts in finite-size reflectors, as seen in the agreement between infinite-model analytics and finite full-wave simulations.
  • The same second-order nonlocal boundary condition serves as a first-order design step that final numerical tuning refines to account for parasitic reactances.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper's three examples, the same principle should generalize to higher-order rational impedances with more coefficients to approximate more complex patterns, at the cost of more degrees of freedom in the meta-atom geometry.
  • The paper's sign convention for excluding surface waves is delicate; a direct check of the pole locations for the Table I triplets would tell whether the condition is sufficient or merely convenient.
  • The method may transfer to other frequency bands or to transmissive (penetrable) metasurfaces, where a nonlocal admittance would play the role of the impedance used here.
  • A practical limit is that $A$ and $B$ cannot be tuned independently in the mushroom geometry, so the space of reachable patterns is smaller than the full three-parameter space; independent control would require a different meta-atom topology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a two-dimensional synthesis method in which a magnetic line current radiates above a uniform, spatially dispersive impedance metasurface. The surface impedance is approximated by the rational function Z_s(γ)=jX(1-Aγ²)/(1-Bγ²), the reflection coefficient is derived in the spectral domain, and the far-field pattern is expressed as proportional to 1-ρ(θ)exp(-jk2h cosθ). Three target patterns (Π-shaped, Secant, Nulls) are designed by choosing X, A, B; a loaded mushroom-type HIS is used for physical realization, and full-wave CST/COMSOL simulations plus one microwave experiment for the Secant case are reported as reproducing the main features of the targets. The central claim is that radiation-pattern engineering in reflection is possible without any spatial modulation, relying instead on intentionally engineered nonlocal response.

Significance. If correct, the proposal is a significant simplification of pattern-synthesis practice: identical meta-atoms suffice, and the source can be translated parallel to the surface without changing the pattern. The paper's strengths are the closed-form forward model, the explicit homogenization formulas in Appendix A, and the combination of analytical, full-wave (two solvers), and experimental evidence. The limitation to three real coefficients and the resulting imperfect fits are acknowledged honestly. However, the theoretical shortcut that makes Eq. (11) the predictor--the omission of the residue sum in Eq. (10)--depends on a surface-wave-avoidance criterion that is asserted without proof and appears to be incorrect with the branch convention required by Eqs. (3) and (8). The reported examples may still be valid, but the general synthesis constraint in step 2 of the algorithm is not.

major comments (1)
  1. [II.A, after Eq. (7); Eq. (10)] The surface-wave-avoidance condition stated after Eq. (7) is load-bearing and is not supported. With the e^{jωt} convention and the branch of sqrt(1-γ²) that makes the incident spectrum (3) decay away from the source (Im sqrt <0 for |γ|>1), a pole at γ=a+jb with b>0 produces e^{jkγx}e^{-jk sqrt(1-γ²)(z+h)} = e^{jka x}e^{-kb x}e^{-k sqrt(γ²-1)(z+h)} for that branch, i.e. a decaying, physical wave for x>0. Conversely, a proper bound surface wave has real γ>1 and is not excluded by the stated 'positive imaginary part' criterion. Since Z_s(γ) in Eq. (2) is even, complex poles occur in ± pairs, so at least one member lies in the half-plane that contributes to the x>0 field unless its residue vanishes identically. The omission of the residue sum in Eq. (11) therefore needs a separate justification: either prove a corrected nonphysical-wave condition, or for the reported designs compute the residues and show they are negligible, and update step 2 of the synthesis algorithm accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II.A, Eq. (3)] Please state explicitly the branch of sqrt(1-γ²) used for |γ|>1 (the one that makes the incident spectrum decay with distance from the source), and use the same branch consistently in the discussion after Eq. (7).
  2. [II.A, Eq. (10)] The displayed equation is hard to read because the continuation line begins with a '+' and the equation number is placed between the two parts; please reformat so the residue sum is clearly part of the same expression.
  3. [III, Fig. 7] Please report a quantitative measure of agreement, such as mean squared error in dB over the stated angular ranges, ripple for the Π case, and null depth for the Nulls case, so that the claim 'reproduce the main features' is less subjective.
  4. [III, Fig. 3] The three solutions are identified only by color; please add distinct markers or labels so the figure remains readable in grayscale or for color-blind readers.
  5. [IV, Fig. 8] The experimental comparison is shown only for the Secant pattern; please state explicitly that the other two designs were not measured and indicate the reason, or add the measurements if feasible.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The coefficients fitted to the target are labeled 'analytically predicted', but the central claim is validated by independent full-wave simulation and experiment, so no substantive circularity.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 3 and Table I caption]
    "The optimal values of X, A and B in this work are found using the mean squared error criteria to approximate the desired pattern shapes ... Table I. The analytically predicted coefficients X, A, B, and the corresponding geometric parameters of idealized meta-atoms (with lumped loads) found using the expressions of Appendix A for three different shapes of the radiation pattern."

    The coefficients X, A, B are obtained by least-squares fitting the target radiation pattern through Eq. (11), yet Table I calls them 'analytically predicted coefficients'. The analytical red curves in Fig. 7 are computed from these same fitted coefficients, so their reproduction of the target shapes is by construction rather than an independent prediction. This is a mislabeled fitted input. However, the actual validation of the synthesis approach is the full-wave CST and Comsol radiation patterns and the Secant-pattern experiment, which were not used to select X, A, B; those comparisons are independent and keep the central claim non-circular.

full rationale

The derivation chain leading to Eq. (11) is a standard spectral-domain reflection problem: the total far field is 1 - rho(theta) exp(-jk2h cos(theta)), with rho(theta) determined by the nonlocal impedance Zs(gamma) of Eq. (2). Choosing X, A, and B to approximate a target pattern via Eq. (11) is an inverse-design or fitting step, not a prediction. The paper does not use the full-wave or measured patterns to choose these coefficients; the full-wave Zs(gamma) curves are matched to the fitted impedance, and then the radiation patterns are computed by independent CST and Comsol simulations and by experiment. Thus the central demonstration, that a uniform nonlocal mushroom-type HIS can realize the prescribed Zs(gamma) and produce the target pattern, is empirically checked rather than assumed. The only circularity-adjacent issue is terminology: the MSE-fitted coefficients are called 'analytically predicted', and the analytical curves in Fig. 7 are by construction close to the targets. That does not invalidate the independent full-wave and experimental verification. The unproven surface-wave-avoidance condition after Eq. (7) is a correctness risk (the sign of Im(gamma_sw) may be inverted relative to the stated branch, and residue terms in Eq. (10) may not be negligible), but it is not a circularity: it is an unjustified physical assumption, not an input/output equivalence. There are no load-bearing self-citations by the present authors; the cited homogenization and rational-function models are from external groups and are not used to forbid alternative hypotheses.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on a three-coefficient rational impedance approximation fitted to target patterns, the homogenized description of the loaded mushroom-type HIS from ref [19], and a sign-convention-dependent surface-wave criterion. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • X (surface reactance at normal incidence) = X/eta = -2.6 (Pi), 0.76 (Secant), 10.1 (Nulls)
    Selected by least-squares fitting of Eq. (11) to each target radiation pattern (Sect. III, algorithm step 2). Not derived from first principles for the target.
  • A (zero-position coefficient of the impedance rational function) = A = -0.84 (Pi), -0.76 (Secant), 3.0 (Nulls)
    Fitted simultaneously with X and B to minimize the mean squared error to the target pattern, subject to the dispersion-relation constraint.
  • B (pole-position coefficient of the impedance rational function) = B = -6.2 (Pi), 0.65 (Secant), -104 (Nulls)
    Fitted simultaneously with X and A; for the Nulls pattern the large negative value produces strong angular variation and strong spatial dispersion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The nonlocal surface impedance is well approximated by Z_s(gamma) = jX(1-A gamma^2)/(1-B gamma^2) over the relevant spectrum 0 <= |gamma| < pi/(kp).
    Invoked in Eq. (2), justified by a Pade approximation with at most one zero and one pole, valid for subwavelength periodic metasurfaces; the paper notes the approximation's range but does not quantify errors in the evanescent part.
  • domain assumption The metasurface is lossless, reciprocal, and impenetrable, so the transmitted field is zero and the coefficients X, A, B are real.
    Stated in Sect. II A; required for the boundary condition (4) and the reflection coefficient (5) to take the given form.
  • domain assumption The loaded mushroom-type HIS of ref [19] can realize the required Z_s(gamma) with the available microstructure parameters.
    Appendix A maps X, A, B to geometry using the homogenization model of ref [19]; the paper also states that A and B cannot be independently controlled in this structure, so achievable impedance curves are limited.
  • standard math The steepest descent evaluation of the radiation integral yields the far field as in Eqs. (10)-(11), with residue contributions vanishing when no proper surface-wave poles are excited.
    Standard asymptotic evaluation of the Fourier integral; the paper relies on this to omit the residue sum in Eq. (11).
  • ad hoc to paper The condition Im(gamma_sw) > 0 for roots of Eq. (7) guarantees absence of physical surface waves.
    Stated after Eq. (7) without proof; the sign convention is questionable and is the weakest assumption in the paper (see red flags and weakest_assumption).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radiation Pattern Synthesis with Uniform Nonlocal Metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AVRZZ5MJ

@misc{pith2026241116210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radiation Pattern Synthesis with Uniform Nonlocal Metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AVRZZ5MJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16210}
}
read the original abstract

One of the main applications of electromagnetic metasurfaces (MSs) is to tailor spatial field distributions. The radiation pattern of a given source can be desirably modified upon reflection on an MS having proper spatial modulation of its local macroscopic parameters. At the microscopic level, spatial modulation requires individually engineered meta-atoms at different points. In contrast, the present research demonstrates the opportunity for radiation pattern engineering in the reflection regime without using any spatial modulation. The principle consists in the deliberate tailoring of the surface impedance of an unmodulated but spatially dispersive (nonlocal) MS. A 2D synthesis problem with a magnetic line current source is solved analytically by finding a required form of the surface impedance as a function of the tangential wave vector in both visible and evanescent parts of the spatial spectrum. To prove the principle, three different pattern shapes are implemented via full-wave numerical simulations by tuning the spatial dispersion in a realistic mushroom-type high-impedance electromagnetic surface with loaded vias. This work extends the synthesis methods and the application area of spatially dispersive MSs, showing the latter as a promising platform for new types of antennas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16210 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sketch of the considered two-dimensional boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Mushroom-type HIS with loaded vias: top view (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Simulation setup for numerical calculation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dependencies of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The results of full-wave simulations obtained for finite-size and fabrication-ready MSs compared to the analytical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The experimental verification of the possibility of the radiation patter engineering: (a) sketch and photographs of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    select the radiation pattern shape to be realized

    work page

  2. [2]

    find the combination of X, A, and B, which min- 5 imizes the mean squared error (or other criteria) between the target radiation pattern and that cal- culated through (11) imposing a constraint by en- suring that roots of the dispersion relation (7) are non-physical

    work page

  3. [3]

    select which parameters of the microstructure should be adjusted for the considered MS type

    work page

  4. [4]

    calculate a data set of X, A, and B coefficients us- ing (A1) and (A2) by varying the chosen structure parameters

    work page

  5. [5]

    The meta-atom parameters determined using the above algorithm provide a good first-order solution to the MS synthesis problem

    find the triplet of X, A, and B in the data set which is the closest to the combination from step 2. The meta-atom parameters determined using the above algorithm provide a good first-order solution to the MS synthesis problem. In fact, the presence of parasitics in the meta-atom (e.g. the reactance of the connection between the lumped element and the bot...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Ra’di, C

    Y. Ra’di, C. R. Simovski, and S. A. Tretyakov, Thin per- fect absorbers for electromagnetic waves: Theory, design, and realizations, Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 037001 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    with constant level of radiation in the range of an- gles θ from −60◦ to 60◦ with a sharp cut-off outside the range (Π -shaped)

    work page

  8. [8]

    with a symmetrical smooth dip around the nor- mal direction with the far-field level proportional to 1/ cos(θ) in the range of angles θ from −40◦ to 40◦ (Secant)

    work page

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    ϵh k2 p k2 − l2 2 τ 2 + 1 − ϵh k2 pl ξk 2 τ 2 # cos(kTEMl) β1 = 2 ϵh +

    with nulls created at specific angles θ = ±20◦ (Nulls ). To be consistent with PCB technology, for three corre- sponding realizations of the loaded mushroom-type HIS, we use a commercial Rogers RO4003C substrate with rel- ative permittivity of ϵh = 3.38(1−j0.0027) and thicknes...

  2. [10]

    Yu and F

    N. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer meta- surfaces., Nature materials 13 2, 139 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    S. B. Glybovski, S. A. Tretyakov, P. A. Belov, Y. S. Kivshar, and C. R. Simovski, Metasurfaces: From mi- crowaves to visible, Physics Reports 634, 1 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Epstein and G

    A. Epstein and G. V. Eleftheriades, Arbitrary power- conserving field transformations with passive lossless omega-type bianisotropic metasurfaces, IEEE Transac- tions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 3880 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Chen and G

    M. Chen and G. V. Eleftheriades, Omega-bianisotropic wire-loop Huygens’ metasurface for reflectionless wide- angle refraction, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 1477 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Radi and S

    Y. Radi and S. Tretyakov, Balanced and optimal bian- isotropic particles: Maximizing power extracted from electromagnetic fields, New Journal of Physics 15 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    V. S. Asadchy, Y. Ra’di, J. Vehmas, and S. A. Tretyakov, Functional metamirrors using bianisotropic elements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 095503 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Mosallaei and K

    H. Mosallaei and K. Sarabandi, Antenna miniaturization and bandwidth enhancement using a reactive impedance substrate, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propaga- tion 52, 2403 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    Baracco, L

    J.-M. Baracco, L. Salghetti-Drioli, and P. de Maagt, AMC low profile wideband reference antenna for GPS and GALILEO systems, IEEE Transactions on Anten- 11 nas and Propagation 56, 2540 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    C.-M. Tran, H. Ouslimani, L. Zhou, A. Priou, H. Teil- let, J.-Y. Daden, and A. Ourir, High impedance surfaces based antennas for high data rate communications at 40 GHz, Progress In Electromagnetics Research C 13, 217 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Yang, K.-P

    F.-R. Yang, K.-P. Ma, Y. Qian, and T. Itoh, A novel TEM waveguide using uniplanar compact photonic- bandgap (UC-PBG) structure, IEEE Transactions on Mi- crowave Theory and Techniques 47, 2092 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Higgins, H

    J. Higgins, H. Xin, A. Sailer, and M. Rosker, Ka-band waveguide phase shifter using tunable electromagnetic crystal sidewalls, IEEE Transactions on Microwave The- ory and Techniques 51, 1281 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Luukkonen, C

    O. Luukkonen, C. Simovski, A. Raisanen, and S. Tretyakov, An efficient and simple analytical model for analysis of propagation properties in impedance waveg- uides, Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Trans- actions on 56, 1624 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Yang and Y

    F. Yang and Y. Rahmat-Samii, Microstrip antennas in- tegrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) struc- tures: a low mutual coupling design for array applica- tions, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51, 2936 (2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    Pozar, Wideband reflectarrays using artificial impedance surfaces, Electronics Letters 43, 148 (2007)

    D. Pozar, Wideband reflectarrays using artificial impedance surfaces, Electronics Letters 43, 148 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    P. A. Belov, C. R. Simovski, and P. Ikonen, Canaliza- tion of subwavelength images by electromagnetic crys- tals, Phys. Rev. B 71, 193105 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    B. H. Fong, J. S. Colburn, J. J. Ottusch, J. L. Visher, and D. F. Sievenpiper, Scalar and tensor holographic artificial impedance surfaces, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 58, 3212 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Minatti, F

    G. Minatti, F. Caminita, M. Casaletti, and S. Maci, Spiral leaky-wave antennas based on modulated surface impedance, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propa- gation 59, 4436 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Luukkonen, M

    O. Luukkonen, M. G. Silveirinha, A. B. Yakovlev, C. R. Simovski, I. S. Nefedov, and S. A. Tretyakov, Effects of spatial dispersion on reflection from mushroom-type artificial impedance surfaces, IEEE Transactions on Mi- crowave Theory and Techniques 57, 2692 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    C. S. R. Kaipa, A. B. Yakovlev, S. I. Maslovski, and M. G. Silveirinha, Mushroom-type high-impedance sur- face with loaded vias: Homogenization model and ultra- thin design, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 10, 1503 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    Yang and Y

    F. Yang and Y. Rahmat-Samii, Reflection phase char- acterizations of the EBG ground plane for low profile wire antenna applications, IEEE Transactions on Anten- nas and Propagation 51, 2691 (2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    Luukkonen, A

    O. Luukkonen, A. B. Yakovlev, C. R. Simovski, and S. A. Tretyakov, Comparative study of surface waves on high- impedance surfaces with and without vias, in 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Sympo- sium (2008) pp. 1–4

    2008

  23. [31]

    This approximation can capture possible poles and ze- ros of Zs(ω, γ) with respect to γ

    dependent on the wave vector, as discussed in [28]. This approximation can capture possible poles and ze- ros of Zs(ω, γ) with respect to γ. Assuming a practi- cal realization of the MS as a uniform periodic structure of subwavelengh meta-atoms, we note that the possible value...

  24. [32]

    V. S. Asadchy, M. Albooyeh, S. N. Tcvetkova, A. D ´ ıaz- Rubio, Y. Ra’di, and S. A. Tretyakov, Perfect control of reflection and refraction using spatially dispersive meta- surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075142 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Zhirihin, C

    D. Zhirihin, C. Simovski, P. Belov, and S. Glybovski, Mushroom high-impedance metasurfaces for perfect ab- sorption at two angles of incidence, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 2626 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    C. S. R. Kaipa, A. B. Yakovlev, S. I. Maslovski, and M. G. Silveirinha, Near-field imaging with a loaded wire medium, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155103 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    H. Kwon, D. Sounas, A. Cordaro, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Nonlocal metasurfaces for optical signal processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 173004 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Dugan, T

    J. Dugan, T. J. Smy, F. Monticone, and S. Gupta, Sur- face susceptibility synthesis of spatially dispersive meta- surfaces for space compression and spatial signal process- ing, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 72, 6572 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    J. G. N. Rahmeier, T. J. Smy, J. Dugan, and S. Gupta, Zero thickness surface susceptibilities and extended GSTCs—part I: Spatially dispersive metasurfaces, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 71, 5909 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    L. B. Felsen and N. Marcuvitz, Radiation and Scattering of Waves (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    Bankov and K

    S. Bankov and K. Klionovski, Waves guided by meta- surfaces with non-local impedance boundary conditions, Waves in Random and Complex Media 0, 1 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    S. Maci, M. Caiazzo, A. Cucini, and M. Casaletti, A pole-zero matching method for EBG surfaces composed of a dipole FSS printed on a grounded dielectric slab, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 53, 70 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    M. I. Kontorovich et al., Reflection factor of a plane elec- tromagnetic wave reflecting from a plane wire grid, Radio Engineering and Electronic Physics 2, 222 (1962)

    1962

  34. [42]

    Tretyakov, Analytical Modeling in Applied Electromag- netics (2003)

    S. Tretyakov, Analytical Modeling in Applied Electromag- netics (2003)

    2003

  35. [43]

    D. V. Tatarnikov, Semi-transparent ground planes ex- cited by magnetic line current, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 2843 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Taghvaee, F

    H. Taghvaee, F. Liu, A. D ´ ıaz-Rubio, and S. Tretyakov, Perfect-lens theory enables metasurface reflectors for sub- wavelength focusing, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 014004 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    M. G. Silveirinha, C. A. Fernandes, and J. R. Costa, Elec- tromagnetic characterization of textured surfaces formed by metallic pins, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 405 (2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    Roudot, C

    B. Roudot, C. Terret, P. Pribetich, and P. Kennis, Fun- damental surface-wave effects on microstrip antenna ra- diation, Electronics Letters 21, 1112 (1985)

    1985

  39. [47]

    Sievenpiper, L

    D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. Broas, N. Alexopolous, and E. Yablonovitch, High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band, IEEE Trans- actions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 47, 2059 (1999)

    1999

  40. [48]

    Luukkonen, C

    O. Luukkonen, C. Simovski, G. Granet, G. Goussetis, D. Lioubtchenko, A. V. Raisanen, and S. A. Tretyakov, Simple and accurate analytical model of planar grids and high-impedance surfaces comprising metal strips or patches, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propaga- tion 56, 16...

    2008

  41. [49]

    S. I. Maslovski and M. G. Silveirinha, Nonlocal permit- tivity from a quasistatic model for a class of wire media, Phys. Rev. B 80, 245101 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.