Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Temporal synthesis of optical nonlinearity through synergy of spectrally-tuneable electron and phonon dynamics in a metamaterial

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gold nanorod metamaterial on a mirror recovers its reflection properties in under 300 fs, faster than the gold's own hot-electron relaxation, via Fano-type interference between hot electrons and acoustic vibrations.

desk verdict Solid spectroscopy undermined by an un-deconvolved fast transient: the sub-300 fs recovery claim needs instrument-response correction and a model that reproduces the NIR response before I'd buy it. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16265 v1 pith:VPTORGOB submitted 2024-11-25 physics.optics

Jingyi Wu (1) , Anton Yu. Bykov (1) , Anastasiia Zaleska (1) , Anatoly V. Zayats (1) ((1) Department of Physics , London Centre for Nanotechnology , King's College London) This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.-k78.47.-p78.67.-n
keywords ultrafastnonlinearityplasmonicmetamaterialhot-electrondynamicsacousticphononsFanointerferencetime-resolvedreflectionall-opticalswitchinggoldnanorods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the temporal response of a plasmonic metamaterial's optical nonlinearity can be engineered to be faster than the intrinsic hot-electron relaxation of its constituent metal. In a gold nanorod metamaterial sitting on a gold mirror, excitation at 1030 nm creates a hot-electron distribution concentrated in the mirror, while 515 nm excitation heats the rods more strongly. At certain probe wavelengths near a guided-mode resonance, the reflection signal shows an initial decay below 300 fs, which the authors attribute to Fano-type destructive interference between the hot-electron response and coherent acoustic vibrations of the nanostructure. The effect appears in reflection but not in transmission, and its strength and timescale depend on the excitation wavelength. If correct, this provides a design route to all-optical switches whose speed is set by nanostructure geometry and spectral selection rather than by material constants.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the time-domain analogue of Fano interference: at probe wavelengths near a leaky-waveguided Fabry-Perot resonance of the metamaterial slab, the transient reflection is the coherent sum of a fast hot-electron response (which shifts the resonance) and the delayed, oscillatory response of coherent acoustic vibrations (which modulate the rod radius and length). When the two contributions have opposite signs and comparable amplitudes, their destructive interference produces a rapid initial decay of the reflection that is faster than the hot-electron lifetime. The acoustic modes are identified as the radial breathing and extensional modes of individual nanorods plus a standing longitudinal wave in the alumina matrix, with frequencies given by the rod dimensions and sound velocities, and their excitation phases are derived from a driven-oscillator model with hot-electron pressure and lattice anharmonicity as the source term.

What would settle it

Measure the transient reflection at 690 nm using pump pulses of different durations (e.g., 250 fs and 50 fs) while keeping the fluence constant, and cross-correlate the pump and probe to obtain the instrument response; if the fast decay component broadens in lockstep with the pump pulse, the sub-300 fs claim is an artifact, while a stable sub-300 fs decay would corroborate it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the interplay between optically excited hot electrons and acoustic phonons in a plasmonic metamaterial on a mirror produces a sub-300 fs recovery of the optical constants in reflection, which is faster than the picosecond-scale electron-phonon relaxation of gold. The authors find that the fast component is spectrally localized around 685-690 nm, exactly where the transient spectrum has an asymmetric Fano-type shape, and it occurs only in reflection, not in transmission. They argue that the fast decay arises because the probe response near the Fabry-Perot guided mode is shaped by destructive interference between the hot-electron contribution and the oscillatory acoustic contribution (breathing and extensional modes at approximately 5, 23, and 97 GHz), so that the total signal returns to baseline before the hot electrons have fully cooled. They further show that the hot-electron population can be tuned by excitation wavelength — NIR excitation primarily heats the gold mirror, while visible excitation heats the nanorods — which changes both the sign of the transient reflection and the presence of the fast recovery.

Load-bearing premise

The sub-300 fs recovery is genuine material dynamics rather than a pulse-width artifact, because the paper does not deconvolve the 250 fs pump and 150 fs probe or measure the instrument response independently, and if the fast decay comes from the pulse overlap, the central claim fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All-optical switching in reflection can be made faster than the hot-electron relaxation time of the metal by placing the operating wavelength near a Fano-type spectral feature created by the acoustic vibrations.
  • The switching rate and spectral response become tunable by the excitation wavelength, since NIR and visible pumping heat different parts of the structure (mirror versus nanorods) and produce different transient reflection signatures.
  • The effect is polarization- and angle-sensitive, so it can be selected by choosing TE or TM illumination and the angle of incidence, enabling polarization-diverse operation.
  • Transmission modulation remains slow and spectrally featureless, meaning that the ultrafast switching is available only in reflection at the guided-mode resonances, which is relevant for reflection-mode devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sub-300 fs component is genuine, a natural extension is to test whether the same interplay can be used to create even faster recovery by engineering the acoustic mode frequencies and damping through rod dimensions and matrix stiffness — a prediction not explicitly made in the paper.
  • The backward hot-electron diffusion from the metal underlayer, which the paper highlights as usually overlooked, suggests that similar 'mirror' effects could be present in other plasmonic devices with metal adhesion layers or back-reflectors, so prior switching-time measurements in such structures may warrant re-examination.
  • Because the fast recovery appears only in reflection, the mechanism could enable time-varying reflective metasurfaces or modulators that leave the transmitted beam largely unperturbed, potentially allowing simultaneous switching and polarization routing in the same device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports ultrafast pump-probe experiments on a gold nanorod metamaterial on a mirror, comparing 1030 nm (NIR) and 515 nm (visible) excitation. The authors observe a spectrally selective transient reflection response under NIR excitation, including an initial decay fast enough to be described as 'sub-300 fs' at 685-690 nm, which they attribute to a Fano-type interplay between hot-electron dynamics and acoustic vibrations, together with backward hot-electron diffusion from the gold mirror. They also identify acoustic modes at 5, 23, and 97 GHz and model the visible-excitation response with a two-temperature model and transfer-matrix calculations.

Significance. If the central claim is supported, the paper would demonstrate a strategy for shaping the temporal nonlinear response of a metamaterial beyond the intrinsic hot-electron relaxation time of its constituent metal, while retaining polarization and spectral selectivity. The experimental dataset, including simultaneous transient reflection and transmission, is valuable, and the acoustic-mode identification via analytic estimates provides useful independent information. The paper also honestly states that the numerical model fails to reproduce the NIR-induced response, which is an important limitation that currently leaves the headline sub-300 fs claim unsupported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods 4.2, Fig. 2b] The sub-300 fs recovery claimed for probe wavelengths 685-690 nm is reported without deconvolution from the 250 fs pump and 150 fs probe pulses, and no measurement of the instrument response function is described. Since the observed initial decay width is comparable to the pump duration, the fast feature may be pulse-limited, and the central claim that the modulation 'surpasses the limitations imposed by the inherent material response' is not supported until either deconvolved traces or an independent IRF measurement are provided.
  2. [Section 2.1, Fig. 4] The numerical model is acknowledged to face challenges in replicating the most important features of the NIR-induced response, which is precisely the regime where the sub-300 fs feature appears. Thus the proposed electron-diffusion/Fano-interference mechanism is not validated by the simulation; the fast feature rests on the raw experimental traces alone. A quantitative model of the NIR case, or an explicit statement that the NIR fast feature is not modeled, is needed.
  3. [Section 2.2, Eq. 2, Eq. 13] The acoustic modes identified in Section 2.2 have periods of roughly 10, 43, and 200 ps, which are orders of magnitude longer than the claimed sub-300 fs recovery. The abstract and Discussion attribute the recovery to 'Fano-type destructive interference with acoustic vibrations,' but the manuscript does not explain how acoustic displacements with these periods can cancel a hot-electron signal on a sub-300 fs timescale. This mechanism should be demonstrated quantitatively or the claim should be limited to spectral shaping rather than sub-picosecond recovery.
  4. [Section 2.2, Methods 4.4] The acoustic frequencies and damping constants are obtained by fitting the transient reflection data (Fig. 5a) and are then inserted into Eq. 13 with additional fitting constants A and B to reproduce the same data. This partial circularity does not invalidate the analytic estimates of the breathing and extensional modes (4.6 and 85 GHz), but it weakens the conclusion that the fitted oscillatory component is physically the acoustic contribution to the modulation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1] There is a typo 'excition' in 'the NIR excition' near the end of Section 2.1.
  2. [Fig. 2c] The caption states that high-resolution transient spectra of reflection and transmission were measured simultaneously, but the text says 'no such effects are observed in the transient transmission'; please clarify whether the fast recovery feature is strictly absent in transmission on the same wavelength scale.
  3. [Methods 4.3] Minor typos include 'spectraly integrated' and 'duration of the of the laser pulse'; please correct these.
  4. [Data availability] The data availability statement says data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request; depositing the raw transient traces in a public repository would strengthen reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sub-300 fs claim is an experimental observation, and the fitted acoustic parameters are cross-checked against independent estimates.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, sub-300 fs recovery of optical constants in reflection, is an experimental observation extracted from pump-probe traces rather than a quantity derived from a fitted model. The acoustic-mode analysis in Section 2.2 identifies frequencies and damping by FFT and least-square fitting, but these are cross-checked against independent analytical estimates (Eq. 1 gives 4.6 and 85 GHz versus measured 5 and 97 GHz; the 23 GHz mode is compared with the computed 22.7 GHz alumina standing-wave frequency). The oscillator model in Eq. 2 uses experimental frequencies and damping constants, yet the predicted initial phases are not fixed by those parameters and are compared with the fitted phases as a semi-empirical consistency check, not as a derivation of the central result. Equation 13 in Methods 4.4 is explicitly a fitting decomposition ('where A and B are fitting constants') used to incorporate phonon vibrations into simulated spectra; it does not generate the main sub-300 fs claim. Self-citations provide background, methodology, and prior context but are not load-bearing: the hot-electron distribution is simulated independently in this work, the two-band permittivity model follows standard references, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The absence of an explicit instrument-response deconvolution for the fast decay (Methods 4.2) is a measurement-robustness concern, not a circularity of the derivation chain. No step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard two-temperature and gold permittivity models, on the mirror-backed geometry's effective-medium description, and on a proposed backward hot-electron diffusion mechanism whose interface parameters are not measured. Several acoustic and optical parameters are fitted to the experimental data, which limits the strength of the simulated support.

free parameters (4)
  • Acoustic mode frequencies and damping = 5 GHz (190 ps), 23 GHz (120 ps), 97 GHz (10 ps)
    Extracted from transient reflection data by FFT and least-squares fitting (Section 2.2, Fig. 5); used to identify modes and to parameterize the acoustic model in Eq. 2 and Eq. 13.
  • Fitting constants A and B = Not specified
    In Eq. 13, these convert acoustic displacement into reflection/transmission changes and are fitted to reproduce the transient spectra (Methods 4.4).
  • Restricted mean free path R = 13 nm
    Set for electrodeposited gold based on previous similar samples (Methods 4.4); affects the modeled dielectric function and thus the simulated transient spectra.
  • Gold permittivity model parameters A_i, epsilon_inf, tau_0 = Varied to match Johnson and Christy tabulated values
    Adjusted to reproduce the room-temperature permittivity of gold (Methods 4.4); these are fitted to external tabulated data, not to the transient measurements.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The two-temperature model (Eqs. 3-7) describes electron and lattice temperature dynamics in the metamaterial and mirror.
    Standard model for ultrafast laser heating of metals; invoked in Methods 4.3.
  • domain assumption The two-band model for gold permittivity (Eqs. 8-11) accurately captures the transient dielectric function at the probe wavelengths.
    Used in Methods 4.4 to compute transient reflection and transmission.
  • domain assumption The local effective medium approximation is valid and spatial dispersion is negligible for the metamaterial.
    Stated in Methods 4.4; underpins the transfer matrix modeling.
  • domain assumption One-dimensional heat diffusion is sufficient; in-plane temperature variation can be neglected.
    Justified in Methods 4.3 by the small nanorod cross-section relative to beam sizes and skin depth.
  • domain assumption The acoustic modes identified by Eq. 1 correspond to the observed 5, 23, and 97 GHz oscillations using bulk gold elastic parameters.
    Used in Section 2.2 to assign the vibrational modes; deviations attributed to electrodeposited gold.
  • ad hoc to paper The transient reflection can be decomposed into hot-electron, lattice, and acoustic contributions, with acoustic modes modulating rod radius and length (Eq. 13).
    Specific modeling assumption introduced in Methods 4.4 to reproduce the observed oscillations; relies on fitting constants A and B.
  • ad hoc to paper Backward hot-electron diffusion from the gold mirror into the metamaterial is responsible for the fast NIR-induced reflection recovery.
    Proposed in Section 2.1 as the key mechanism, but interface parameters are unmeasured and the model omitting it fails to reproduce the NIR response.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Temporal synthesis of optical nonlinearity through synergy of spectrally-tuneable electron and phonon dynamics in a metamaterial." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VPTORGOB

@misc{pith2026241116265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Temporal synthesis of optical nonlinearity through synergy of spectrally-tuneable electron and phonon dynamics in a metamaterial},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VPTORGOB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16265}
}
read the original abstract

Manipulating intensity, phase and polarization of the electromagnetic fields on ultrafast timescales is essential for all-optical switching, optical information processing and development of novel time-variant media. Noble metal based plasmonics has provided numerous platforms for optical switching and control, enabled by strong local field enhancement, artificially engineered dispersion and strong Kerr-type free-electron nonlinearities. However, precise control over switching times and spectrum remains challenging, commonly limited by the relaxation of hot-electron gas on picosecond time scales and the band structure of materials. Here we experimentally demonstrate the strong and tuneable nonlinearity in a metamaterial on a mirror geometry, controlled by the wavelength of excitation, which imprints a specific non-uniform hot-electron population distribution and drives targeted electron and lattice dynamics. The interplay of electromagnetic, electronic and mechanical energy exchange allows us to achieve sub-300~fs timescales in the recovery of optical constants in the selected spectral domains, where the modulation surpasses the limitations imposed by the inherent material response of metamaterial components, owing to emergence of a Fano-type destructive interference with acoustic vibrations of the metamaterial, featured in reflection but not in transmission. The observed effects are highly spectrally selective and sensitive to the polarisation properties of light and the Fabry-Perot modes of the metamaterial, opening a pathway for controlling the switching rates by spectral selection and nanostructure design. The capability to manipulate temporal, spectral and mechanical aspects of light-matter interactions underscores new potential nonlinear applications where polarisation diversity, spectral selectivity and fast modulation are important.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature Photonics 6(11), 737– 748 (2012)

    Kauranen, M., Zayats, A.V.: Nonlinear plasmonics. Nature Photonics 6(11), 737– 748 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Applied Physics Reviews 10(2) (2023)

    Koya, A.N., Romanelli, M., Kuttruff, J., Henriksson, N., Stefancu, A., Grin- blat, G., De Andres, A., Schnur, F., Vanzan, M., Marsili, M., Rahaman, M., Viejo Rodr ´ ıguez, A., Tapani, T., Lin, H., Dana, B.D., Lin, J., Barbillon, G., Proi- etti Zaccaria, R., Brida, D., Jariwala, D., Veisz, L., Cort´ es, E., Corni, S., Garoli, D., Maccaferri, N.: Advances i...

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    eLight 4, 15 (2024)

    Khurgin, J., Bykov, A.Y., Zayats, A.V.: Hot-electron dynamics in plasmonic nanostructures. eLight 4, 15 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Laser & Photonics Reviews 12(1), 1700082 (2018)

    Krasavin, A.V., Ginzburg, P., Zayats, A.V.: Free-electron optical nonlinearities in plasmonic nanostructures: A review of the hydrodynamic description. Laser & Photonics Reviews 12(1), 1700082 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Del Fatti, N., Voisin, C., Achermann, M., Tzortzakis, S., Christofilos, D., Vall´ ee, F.: Nonequilibrium electron dynamics in noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 61, 16956– 16966 (2000)

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Arbouet, A., Voisin, C., Christofilos, D., Langot, P., Fatti, N.D., Vall´ ee, F., Lerm´ e, J., Celep, G., Cottancin, E., Gaudry, M., Pellarin, M., Broyer, M., Maillard, M., Pileni, M.P., Treguer, M.: Electron-phonon scattering in metal clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 177401 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Nature Communications 10(1), 2967 (2019)

    Nicholls, L.H., Stefaniuk, T., Nasir, M.E., Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F.J., Wurtz, G.A., Zayats, A.V.: Designer photonic dynamics by using non-uniform elec- tron temperature distribution for on-demand all-optical switching times. Nature Communications 10(1), 2967 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Nature Photonics 6(11), 728–736 (2012)

    Temnov, V.V.: Ultrafast acousto-magneto-plasmonics. Nature Photonics 6(11), 728–736 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Frischwasser, K., Cohen, K., Tsesses, S., Dolev, S., Rosenblatt, G., Bartal, G.: Nonlinear forced response of plasmonic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 103901 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Nature Nanotechnology 4(8), 492–495 (2009) 15

    Pelton, M., Sader, J.E., Burgin, J., Liu, M., Guyot-Sionnest, P., Gosztola, D.: Damping of acoustic vibrations in gold nanoparticles. Nature Nanotechnology 4(8), 492–495 (2009) 15

    2009

  3. [11]

    Nano Letters 23(7), 2786–2791 (2023)

    Bykov, A.Y., Xie, Y.X., Krasavin, A.V.A.V.Z., Zayats, A.V.: Broadband tran- sient response and wavelength-tunable photoacoustics in plasmonic hetero- nanoparticles. Nano Letters 23(7), 2786–2791 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Ruello, P., Ayouch, A., Vaudel, G., Pezeril, T., Delorme, N., Sato, S., Kimura, K., Gusev, V.E.: Ultrafast acousto-plasmonics in gold nanoparticle superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 92, 174304 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 41(19), 195102 (2008)

    Guyader, L.L., Kirilyuk, A., Rasing, T., Wurtz, G.A., Zayats, A.V., Alkemade, P.F.A., Smolyaninov, I.I.: Coherent control of surface plasmon polariton medi- ated optical transmission. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 41(19), 195102 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Menezes, L., Cort´ es, E.: Nanomechanics with plasmonic nanoantennas: ultrafast and local exchange between electromagnetic and mechanical energy

    Bragas, A.V., Maier, S.A., Boggiano, H.D., Grinblat, G., Bert´ e, R., S. Menezes, L., Cort´ es, E.: Nanomechanics with plasmonic nanoantennas: ultrafast and local exchange between electromagnetic and mechanical energy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40(5), 1196–1211 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Nano Letters 18(2), 1124–1129 (2018)

    Yu, S.-J., Ouyang, M.: Coherent discriminatory modal manipulation of acoustic phonons at the nanoscale. Nano Letters 18(2), 1124–1129 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Nature Nanotechnology 6(2), 107–111 (2011)

    Wurtz, G.A., Pollard, R., Hendren, W., Wiederrecht, G.P., Gosztola, D.J., Podol- skiy, V.A., Zayats, A.V.: Designed ultrafast optical nonlinearity in a plasmonic nanorod metamaterial enhanced by nonlocality. Nature Nanotechnology 6(2), 107–111 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Nature Photonics 7(12), 948–957 (2013)

    Poddubny, A., Iorsh, I., Belov, P., Kivshar, Y.: Hyperbolic metamaterials. Nature Photonics 7(12), 948–957 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Laser & Photonics Reviews 18(8), 2300886 (2024)

    Roth, D.J., Krasavin, A.V., Zayats, A.V.: Nanophotonics with plasmonic nanorod metamaterials. Laser & Photonics Reviews 18(8), 2300886 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Nature Reviews Materials 4(8), 535–551 (2019)

    Reshef, O., De Leon, I., Alam, M.Z., Boyd, R.W.: Nonlinear optical effects in epsilon-near-zero media. Nature Reviews Materials 4(8), 535–551 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Nature Communications 6(1), 7757 (2015)

    Neira, A.D., Olivier, N., Nasir, M.E., Dickson, W., Wurtz, G.A., Zayats, A.V.: Eliminating material constraints for nonlinearity with plasmonic metamaterials. Nature Communications 6(1), 7757 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Laser & Photonics Reviews 9(3), 345–353 (2015)

    Vasilantonakis, N., Nasir, M.E., Dickson, W., Wurtz, G.A., Zayats, A.V.: Bulk plasmon-polaritons in hyperbolic nanorod metamaterial waveguides. Laser & Photonics Reviews 9(3), 345–353 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Nature Photonics 14(12), 723–727 (2020) 16

    Schirato, A., Maiuri, M., Toma, A., Fugattini, S., Proietti Zaccaria, R., Laporta, P., Nordlander, P., Cerullo, G., Alabastri, A., Della Valle, G.: Transient optical symmetry breaking for ultrafast broadband dichroism in plasmonic metasurfaces. Nature Photonics 14(12), 723–727...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Nano Letters 13(6), 2710–2716 (2013)

    Yu, K., Zijlstra, P., Sader, J.E., Xu, Q.-H., Orrit, M.: Damping of acoustic vibra- tions of immobilized single gold nanorods in different environments. Nano Letters 13(6), 2710–2716 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Wang, J., Guo, C.: Effect of electron heating on femtosecond laser-induced coherent acoustic phonons in noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 75, 184304 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Wang, J., Wu, J., Guo, C.: Resolving dynamics of acoustic phonons by surface plasmons. Opt. Lett. 32(6), 719–721 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Perner, M., Gresillon, S., M¨ arz, J., Plessen, G., Feldmann, J., Porstendorfer, J., Berg, K.-J., Berg, G.: Observation of hot-electron pressure in the vibration dynamics of metal nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 792–795 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Tas, G., Maris, H.J.: Electron diffusion in metals studied by picosecond ultrason- ics. Phys. Rev. B 49, 15046–15054 (1994)

    1994

  20. [28]

    Optics Communications 94(1), 76–78 (1992)

    Gusev, V.E.: On the duration of acoustic pulses excited by subpicosecond laser action on metals. Optics Communications 94(1), 76–78 (1992)

    1992

  21. [29]

    Thomsen, C., Grahn, H.T., Maris, H.J., Tauc, J.: Surface generation and detection of phonons by picosecond light pulses. Phys. Rev. B 34, 4129–4138 (1986)

    1986

  22. [30]

    Deacon, W.M., Lombardi, A., Benz, F., Valle-Inclan Redondo, Y., Chikkaraddy, R., Nijs, B., Kleemann, M.-E., Mertens, J., Baumberg, J.J.: Interrogating nano- junctions using ultraconfined acoustoplasmonic coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023901 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Nature Commu- nications 10(1), 3384 (2019)

    Frenzel, T., K¨ opfler, J., Jung, E., Kadic, M., Wegener, M.: Ultrasound experi- ments on acoustical activity in chiral mechanical metamaterials. Nature Commu- nications 10(1), 3384 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Nature Materials 22(2), 161–169 (2023)

    Jansen, M., Tisdale, W.A., Wood, V.: Nanocrystal phononics. Nature Materials 22(2), 161–169 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Zaleska, A., Krasavin, A.V., Zayats, A.V., Dickson, W.: Copper-based core–shell metamaterials with ultra-broadband and reversible enz tunability. Mater. Adv. 5, 5845–5854 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Advanced Optical Materials 5(15), 1700299 (2017)

    Peruch, S., Neira, A., Wurtz, G.A., Wells, B., Podolskiy, V.A., Zayats, A.V.: Geometry defines ultrafast hot-carrier dynamics and kerr nonlinearity in plas- monic metamaterial waveguides and cavities. Advanced Optical Materials 5(15), 1700299 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49(1), 307–316 (2006) 17

    Chen, J.K., Tzou, D.Y., Beraun, J.E.: A semiclassical two-temperature model for ultrafast laser heating. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49(1), 307–316 (2006) 17

    2006

  28. [36]

    Dover Publications, New York (2002)

    Zel’dovich, Y.B., Raizer, Y.P.: Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena. Dover Publications, New York (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Carpene, E.: Ultrafast laser irradiation of metals: Beyond the two-temperature model. Phys. Rev. B 74, 024301 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    Computing in Science & Engineering 11(3), 6–15 (2009)

    Guyer, J.E., Wheeler, D., Warren, J.A.: Fipy: Partial differential equations with python. Computing in Science & Engineering 11(3), 6–15 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Guerrisi, M., Rosei, R., Winsemius, P.: Splitting of the interband absorption edge in au. Phys. Rev. B 12, 557–563 (1975)

    1975

  32. [40]

    Nature Communications 15(1), 703 (2024)

    Karaman, C.O., Bykov, A.Y., Kiani, F., Tagliabue, G., Zayats, A.V.: Ultrafast hot-carrier dynamics in ultrathin monocrystalline gold. Nature Communications 15(1), 703 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Masia, F., Langbein, W., Borri, P.: Measurement of the dynamics of plas- mons inside individual gold nanoparticles using a femtosecond phase-resolved microscope. Phys. Rev. B 85, 235403 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Beach, R.T., Christy, R.W.: Electron-electron scattering in the intraband optical conductivity of cu, ag, and au. Phys. Rev. B 16, 5277–5284 (1977)

    1977

  35. [43]

    Johnson, P.B., Christy, R.W.: Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972) 18

    1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.