Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 34 references

Alpha-Delta Transitions in Cortical Rhythms as grazing bifurcations

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The sharp switch from alpha to delta rhythm in the Jansen-Rit cortical-column model is a grazing bifurcation: the orbit's minimum touches the threshold that cuts excitatory feedback, collapsing activity until slow inhibition recovers.

desk verdict Solid, useful paper: identifies the alpha-delta transition in the Jansen-Rit model as a grazing bifurcation with explicit formulas, but the singular limit used doesn't support delta oscillations, so the central claim rests partly on numerical overlap; still deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16449 v2 pith:4RK2YEPM submitted 2024-11-25 math.DS

Huda Mahdi , Jan Sieber , Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DS MSC 34A3634C2337G1537N25
keywords BrainactivityNeuralmassmodelAlphaandDeltarhythmsBifurcationanalysisHeavisidefunctionPiecewisesmoothdynamicalsystemsgrazingJansen-Rit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to explain a sharp transition observed in the Jansen-Rit model, a widely used neural-mass model of a single cortical column, between fast $\alpha$-type oscillations near 10 Hz and slow delta-type oscillations near 2-4 Hz. The transition occurs over a tiny parameter range with little or no hysteresis, which rules out the standard bifurcations of smooth dynamical systems as the underlying mechanism. The authors non-dimensionalise the model and observe that the excitatory activation functions are steep with small thresholds, so a singular limit in which they become all-or-nothing Heaviside switches is appropriate. In that limit they derive an algebraic system for the $\alpha$-type periodic orbits, locate the grazing bifurcation where the minimum of the pyramidal-cell output equals the threshold for switching off the excitatory interneurons, and show numerically that this grazing curve tracks the $\alpha$-delta boundary at the physiological value $\epsilon = 0.024$. A reader should care because the paper gives a mechanistic account of a brain-state switch relevant to sleep and emotional regulation, replacing an earlier purely descriptive identification of the transition.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a piecewise-linear reduction of the non-dimensionalised Jansen-Rit model, obtained by letting the small parameter $\epsilon$ (a quarter of the inverse activation slope) tend to zero so that each sigmoid becomes a Heaviside switch. In this limit the $\alpha$-type orbit is a piecewise-exponential solution of two coupled affine second-order oscillators, (16)-(17), for the pyramidal-cell activity $y_1$ and the inhibitory activity $y_2$, with the excitatory interneuron activity $y_3$ pinned at its equilibrium value $2\alpha_2/G$. The paper parametrises such orbits by their four switching times using the explicit solution formula for the affine oscillator $\ddot{y} = b^2 c - 2b\dot{y} - b^2 y$, which yields the four algebraic equations (20); adjoining the grazing condition (21), which sets the minimum of $y_1$ equal to $y_{0,3}$ with vanishing time derivative, turns the grazing bifurcation into a root-finding problem in two parameters. This finite-dimensional encoding is what makes the transition boundary computable and trackable.

What would settle it

For a sequence of decreasing $\epsilon$ values with the excitatory thresholds held fixed, continue the $\alpha$-type periodic orbits of the full smooth system (5) and record the parameter values where the minimum of $y_1$ first equals $y_{0,3}$; the grazing mechanism is confirmed if this locus converges to the curve given by (20)-(21) as $\epsilon \to 0$. If the locus diverges, or if the sharp frequency drop disappears from the neighbourhood of the curve for any $\epsilon$ smaller than 0.024, the claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, in the singular limit where the excitatory activation functions of the model become Heaviside switches, the $\alpha$-delta transition is a discontinuity-induced grazing bifurcation of the $\alpha$-type periodic orbit. During $\alpha$ oscillations the pyramidal-cell potential $y_1$ stays above the threshold $y_{0,3}$ at which the excitatory interneurons switch off; at the transition, the orbit's minimum $y_{1,\min}$ grazes this threshold in a quadratic tangency, the excitatory interneuron activity collapses, and both excitatory populations drop to near-zero values, producing the relaxation-type profile characteristic of delta activity. The paper encodes this condition as an extra algebraic equation, $y_{1,\min} = y_{0,3}$, appended to the switching-time system (20), and tracks the resulting curve in the $(b^*, G)$ parameter plane, where $b^*$ is the ratio of inhibitory to excitatory decay rates and $G$ is the ratio of inhibitory to excitatory feedback strengths. This grazing curve separates $\alpha$ from delta activity and coincides, over large parts of the plane, with the pair of saddle-node-of-limit-cycle folds and the sharp frequency drop computed for the full smooth system at $\epsilon = 0.024$. The paper notes that this fixed-threshold limit does not itself support delta oscillations, which require the alternative limit in which the excitatory thresholds scale to zero with $\epsilon$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the real model's sharp transition, where activation thresholds are small but not zero, is well approximated by the idealized limit of infinitely steep on-off switches, a limit in which genuine slow delta oscillations do not actually exist, so the match is demonstrated only numerically at one parameter value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The grazing curve computed from (20)-(21) is the singular-limit boundary between alpha and delta activity, and at the physiological value $\epsilon = 0.024$ it coincides with the numerically observed sharp frequency drop in the $(b^*, G)$ plane.
  • Because the transition is a tangency rather than a stability change, the mechanism explains why the alpha-delta switch appears over a small parameter range with almost no hysteresis.
  • In the fixed-threshold singular limit, a trajectory that grazes the threshold collapses to the stable 'off' equilibrium; genuine relaxation-type delta oscillations require the alternative limit in which the excitatory thresholds shrink to zero together with $\epsilon$.
  • The formula for the Hopf bifurcation at $G_1$ in the singular limit gives an explicit prediction for the onset of alpha activity, and the alpha orbits near it display canard-like explosive growth whose parameter-amplitude dependence is in principle computable from the piecewise-exponential formulas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the grazing mechanism is correct, the alpha-delta boundary should be visible in any smooth model with the same small thresholds: as the activation slope increases, the numerically detected tangency of the orbit to the threshold should approach the curve (20)-(21), a testable prediction that the paper checks at only one slope value.
  • The two singular limits the authors contrast, fixed thresholds versus thresholds of order $\epsilon$, correspond to two different physiological regimes: a collapse into an off state versus genuine slow oscillations. An implicit consequence is that real delta activity requires excitatory thresholds comparable to the noise floor, so a cortical measurement of effective activation thresholds could dec
  • The grazing condition is purely geometric, so the same mechanism should persist under moderate changes in connectivity parameters as long as the excitatory thresholds stay small; this suggests the alpha-delta switch is robust across parameter variations, a point the paper does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Jansen-Rit neural mass model and the sharp transition between alpha- and delta-type oscillations. After non-dimensionalisation, a small parameter epsilon is identified, and in the singular limit epsilon -> 0 the sigmoidal activation functions become Heaviside switches. Using strategy (a) (holding the excitatory thresholds y0,1 and y0,3 fixed at 0.08), the authors derive explicit formulas for equilibria (Section 3.3) and an algebraic system, equations (20)-(21), for alpha-type periodic orbits and their grazing bifurcation, where the minimum of the pyramidal-cell output y1 equals the threshold y0,3. They track the grazing curve in the (b*, G)-plane and compare it with numerical bifurcation data at the physiological value epsilon = 0.024 (Figure 6), concluding that the alpha-delta transition is a grazing bifurcation.

Significance. If the central claim is appropriately qualified, the paper makes a valuable contribution. The algebraic derivation of the grazing curve in the singular limit is a substantial piece of analysis, and the explicit formulas for equilibria in Section 3.3 are useful. The paper is commendably transparent: it ships reproducible computational scripts, and the derivation involves no free parameters fit to the target transition. The identification of the alpha-delta transition as a grazing phenomenon is novel and could stimulate further work on discontinuity-induced bifurcations in neural mass models. However, the central claim is only partially supported by the analysis: the singular limit used for the grazing curve does not contain delta-type oscillations, and the numerical comparison with the finite-epsilon system is made at a single value of epsilon. These gaps require revision before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4 (Small-threshold analysis) and abstract] The abstract states that the paper identifies the transition between alpha and delta oscillations as a grazing bifurcation, and the Figure 6 caption calls the grazing curve 'Asymptotically for epsilon -> 0 the transition boundary between delta and alpha activity'. This overstates what is established. The singular limit used for the derivation is strategy (a), with y0,1 = y0,3 = 0.08 fixed. In this limit delta-type oscillations do not exist: Section 4 explicitly states that 'the limit epsilon -> 0 with fixed thresholds y0,1, y0,3 does not support delta-type oscillations', and Table 3 shows that the stable 'off' equilibrium yeq1 = (0,0,0) is present for all G. Therefore the grazing curve from equations (20)-(21) is rigorously a boundary of the alpha-type periodic orbit branch only; it is not a bifurcation between two coexisting oscillation types in that limit. The alpha-delta identification at epsilon = 0.024 rests on the numerical overlap of the grazing curve with the SNP folds in Figure 6a, which is an observation, not a derived asymptotic statement. The abstract and introduction should be revised to state that grazing marks the collapse of alpha-type support, and that for the smooth system at physiological epsilon this collapse coincides with the numerically observed alpha-delta transition.
  2. [Section 3.4, Figure 6a] The quantitative claim of accuracy is not backed by a convergence study or an error bound. The SNP folds are computed only at epsilon = 0.024, and the text itself acknowledges that 'for larger b* a small deviation is noticeable'. To support the statement in the introduction that the grazing bifurcation is an 'accurate approximation' of the boundary between alpha- and delta-type oscillations, the paper should report the distance between the grazing curve and the SNP folds (for example, the maximal error in G or b* over the plotted parameter range), and ideally show the SNP curves for a sequence of smaller epsilon values approaching the epsilon -> 0 grazing curve.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 4] The statement in Section 3.2 that 'In both limits the collapse of the alpha-frequency oscillations is a grazing bifurcation' is not derived for strategy (b), in which y0,1 and y0,3 scale with epsilon and in which delta-type oscillations exist. The analysis of strategy (b) is limited to showing that the small-activity equilibria disappear (Section 3.3, 'Brief comment on the excitatory activation thresholds'), and Section 4 defers a detailed analysis to future work. Since strategy (b) is the limit that actually supports delta oscillations, the paper should either derive or numerically demonstrate the grazing condition in that threshold-scaling limit, or explicitly mark the assertion as a conjecture.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2, Table 1] The units of y0 are given as '[mV]−1'; since y0 is an activation threshold, the units should be 'mV', not 'mV^-1'.
  2. [Section 3.4, text near Figure 6] The representative points in the alpha and delta regions are given as '(0.4, 0.14)' and '(0.4, 0.16)' in the body text, but should be '(0.4, 1.4)' and '(0.4, 1.6)' as in the figure caption.
  3. [Abstract] The abbreviation 'eg.' should be 'e.g.'.
  4. [Section 2] The phrase 'exictatory interneurons' is a typo for 'excitatory interneurons'.
  5. [Equation (12)] The definition of Rhs0(y1) would be clearer if the three cases for the different G-intervals (as given in the table below) were included explicitly, since the single conditional expression does not display the G-dependence of the right-hand side.
  6. [Figure 6a] The frequency shading is described in the text but the figure does not contain a color bar or legend explaining the frequency scale; adding one would aid interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the grazing bifurcation curve is derived from the non-dimensionalised model equations with fixed Jansen-Rit parameters and checked against an independent finite-epsilon numerical computation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The singular limit, equations (4)-(8), follows from the original Jansen-Rit parameter values in Tables 1 and 2, with epsilon equal to 0.024 fixed rather than fitted. The alpha-type periodic orbits and the grazing condition are obtained explicitly: equations (20) are the four crossing and periodicity relations for the piecewise linear limit, and equation (21) adds the minimum condition y1,min = y0,3; tracking the root y1,min - y0,3 = 0 in the (b*, G) plane is a direct continuation of that algebraic system, not a fit to the alpha-delta frequency boundary. The comparison with the full system at epsilon = 0.024 is an independent numerical check: Figure 6a overlays the grazing curve with the shading by frequency and with the pair of saddle-node-of-limit-cycle folds (SNP), and the paper states only that the folds 'overlap with the grazing bifurcation', which is an observation rather than a fitted input. There are no load-bearing self-citations; references [11,22,27] are external. The paper candidly flags the main limitation in Section 4: 'Our analysis shows that the limit epsilon -> 0 with fixed thresholds y0,1, y0,3 does not support delta-type oscillations.' This means the singular-limit argument alone establishes the collapse of the alpha-type orbit, and the identification with delta activity rests on the finite-epsilon numerical overlap. That is a genuine scope limitation of the asymptotic claim, but it is a correctness and strength concern, not a circularity: the derivation does not presuppose the transition it predicts, and the finite-epsilon check is an external datum. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or physical entities; all parameter values are inherited from the original Jansen-Rit model. The main extra assumptions are the choice of singular limit strategy and the structural ansatz for alpha-type periodic orbits.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Jansen-Rit model (1) with parameters from Table 1 captures the essential alpha and delta EEG-like oscillations of a cortical column.
    The entire analysis operates inside this model; the biological interpretation relies on the model's established acceptance (Jansen and Rit 1995; Grimbert and Faugeras 2006).
  • ad hoc to paper Singular-limit strategy (a), holding excitatory thresholds y0,1 and y0,3 fixed at O(1) values while epsilon -> 0, is an appropriate approximation for the alpha-delta transition at epsilon=0.024.
    This limit is chosen for tractability and yields explicit formulas, but the paper itself states that delta-type oscillations are not supported in this limit and that a small-threshold limit (b) would be needed. The adequacy of strategy (a) is checked only numerically (Figure 6).
  • ad hoc to paper Alpha-type periodic orbits in the singular limit have a fixed four-phase structure with y3 at its equilibrium value 2*alpha2/G.
    This ansatz underlies the algebraic system (20); it is motivated by Figure 5a but no proof is given that all alpha-type orbits in the limit have this structure or that the family connects all the way to the Hopf bifurcation.
  • standard math Standard piecewise-smooth dynamical systems theory (crossing conditions, grazing bifurcations, Filippov solutions) applies to the discontinuous limit system.
    Used in Section 3.4 to argue that switch surfaces are crossed transversally except at codimension-2 sets, and to identify the quadratic tangency as a grazing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Alpha-Delta Transitions in Cortical Rhythms as grazing bifurcations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4RK2YEPM

@misc{pith2026241116449,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Alpha-Delta Transitions in Cortical Rhythms as grazing bifurcations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4RK2YEPM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16449}
}
read the original abstract

The Jansen-Rit model of a cortical column in the cerebral cortex is widely used to simulate spontaneous brain activity (EEG) and event-related potentials. It couples a pyramidal cell population with two interneuron populations, of which one is fast and excitatory and the other slow and inhibitory. Our paper studies the transition between alpha and delta oscillations produced by the model. Delta oscillations are slower than alpha oscillations and have a more complex relaxation-type time profile. In the context of neuronal population activation dynamics, a small threshold means that neurons begin to activate with small input or stimulus, indicating high sensitivity to incoming signals. A steep slope signifies that activation increases sharply as input crosses the threshold. Accordingly in the model the excitatory activation thresholds are small and the slopes are steep. Hence, a singular limit replacing the excitatory activation function with all-or-nothing switches, eg. a Heaviside function, is appropriate. In this limit we identify the transition between alpha and delta oscillations as a discontinuity-induced grazing bifurcation. At the grazing the minimum of the pyramidal-cell output equals the threshold for switching off the excitatory interneuron population, leading to a collapse in excitatory feedback.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16449 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Interactions between 3 neuronal populations in local circuit of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Bifurcation diagram of Jansen-Rit model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a-g) Intersections between left- (red) and right-hand (blue) side of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Equilibria and periodic orbits branching off Hopf bifurcation (HB1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time profile of alpha-type piecewise exponential periodic orbits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Panel (a): Composite bifurcation diagram overlaying regions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time profile for alpha-type canard orbit near Hopf bifurcation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahmadizadeh, P

    S. Ahmadizadeh, P. J. Karoly, D. Neˇ si´ c, D. B. Grayden, M. J. Cook, D. Soudry, and D. R. Freestone. Bifurcation analysis of two coupled Jansen-Rit neural mass models. PloS ONE , 13(3):e0192842, 2018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192842

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192842 2018

  2. [2]

    Beno ˆ ıt

    E. Beno ˆ ıt. Chasse au canard. Collectanea Mathematica, 32(2):37–119, 1981

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    S. M. Brudzynski, J. S. Burgdorf, and J. R. Moskal. From emotional arousal to executive action. role of the prefrontal cortex.Brain Structure and Function, 229(9):2327–2338, Aug. 2024. ISSN 1863-2661. doi: 10. 1007/s00429-024-02837-w

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    J. S. Burgdorf and J. R. Moskal. A prefrontal cortex alpha/delta switch controls the transition from positive to negative affective states.Discover Mental Health, 3(1):19, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s44192-023-00044-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s44192-023-00044-3 2023

  5. [5]

    A. Coletti. On Jansen-Rit system modeling epilepsy phenomena. In A. Slavova, editor, New Trends in the Applications of Differential Equa- tions in Sciences , pages 281–292, Cham, 2023. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-031-21484-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-21484-4 25

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21484-4 2023

  6. [6]

    F. H. L. da Silva, A. Hoeks, H. Smits, and L. H. Zetterberg. Model of brain rhythmic activity: The alpha-rhythm of the thalamus. Kybernetik, 15(1):27–37, Mar. 1974. ISSN 0023-5946. doi: 10.1007/bf00270757

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00270757 1974

  7. [7]

    F. H. L. da Silva, A. van Rotterdam, P. Barts, E. van Heusden, and W. Burr. Models of Neuronal Populations: The Basic Mechanisms of Rhythmicity, page 281–308. Elsevier, 1976. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08) 60995-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08 1976

  8. [8]

    Dankowicz and F

    H. Dankowicz and F. Schilder. Recipes for Continuation . SIAM, Philadelphia, 2013. doi: 10.1137/1.9781611972573. 30

    doi:10.1137/1.9781611972573 2013

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    David and K

    O. David and K. J. Friston. A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics. NeuroImage, 20(3):1743–1755, 2003. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.015

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    Desroches, M

    M. Desroches, M. Krupa, and S. Rodrigues. Inflection, canards and excitability threshold in neuronal models. Journal of Mathematical Bi- ology, 67:989–1017, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0576-z

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    di Bernardo, C

    M. di Bernardo, C. Budd, A. R. Champneys, and P. Kowalczyk. Piecewise-smooth Dynamical Systems : Theory and Applications , vol- ume 163. Springer Science & Business Media, London, 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-708-4

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    Ermentrout

    B. Ermentrout. Simulating, Analyzing, and Animating Dynamical Sys- tems: A Guide to XPPAUT for Researchers and Students . SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 2002

    2002

  5. [13]

    Forrester, J

    M. Forrester, J. J. Crofts, S. N. Sotiropoulos, S. Coombes, and R. D. O’Dea. The role of node dynamics in shaping emergent functional con- nectivity patterns in the brain. Network Neuroscience , 4(2):467–483,

  6. [14]

    W. J. Freeman. Simulation of chaotic EEG patterns with a dynamic model of the olfactory system. Biological Cybernetics, 56(2):139–150,

  7. [15]

    Grimbert and O

    F. Grimbert and O. Faugeras. Bifurcation analysis of Jansen’s neural mass model. Neural computation, 18(12):3052–3068, 2006. doi: 10.1162/ neco.2006.18.12.3052

    2006

  8. [16]

    Guckenheimer and P

    J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, volume 42. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    E. M. Izhikevich. Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience . MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 2007. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/2526.001.0001

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    B. H. Jansen and V. G. Rit. Electroencephalogram and visual evoked po- tential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biological cybernetics, 73(4):357–366, 1995. doi: 10.1007/BF00199471

    1995 doi

  11. [19]

    B. H. Jansen, G. Zouridakis, and M. E. Brandt. A neurophysiologically- based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials. Biological Cybernetics, 68(3):275–283, 1993. 31

    1993

  12. [20]

    Krupa and P

    M. Krupa and P. Szmolyan. Relaxation oscillation and canard explosion. Journal of Differential Equations , 174(2):312–368, 2001. doi: 10.1006/ jdeq.2000.3929

    2001

  13. [21]

    Y. A. Kuznetsov. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory , volume 112 of Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer-Verlag, Cham, 4 edition,

  14. [22]

    Y. A. Kuznetsov, S. Rinaldi, and A. Gragnani. One-parameter bifurca- tions in planar Filippov systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , 13(08):2157–2188, 2003. doi: 10.1142/S0218127403007874

    2003 doi

  15. [23]

    Marten, S

    F. Marten, S. Rodrigues, O. Benjamin, J. Terry, and M. Richardson. Onset of poly-spike complexes in a mean-field model of human EEG and its application to absence epilepsy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 367...

    2008

  16. [24]

    K. S. Rashmii. Long-term potentiation (LTP): a simple yet powerful cel- lular process in learning and memory. Master’s thesis, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, 2021. URL https://impressions.manipal.edu/ kmcmlr/15. Publication No. 15

    2021

  17. [25]

    Rodrigues, D

    S. Rodrigues, D. Barton, F. Marten, M. Kibuuka, G. Alarcon, M. P. Richardson, and J. R. Terry. A method for detecting false bifurcations in dynamical systems: application to neural-field models. Biological Cybernetics, 102:145–154, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00422-009-0357-y

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    Stefanovski, P

    L. Stefanovski, P. Triebkorn, A. Spiegler, M.-A. Diaz-Cortes, A. Solod- kin, V. Jirsa, A. R. McIntosh, P. Ritter, and A. D. N. Initiative. Linking molecular pathways and large-scale computational modeling to assess candidate disease mechanisms and pharmacodynamics in Alzheimer...

    2019

  19. [27]

    Touboul and O

    J. Touboul and O. Faugeras. Codimension two bifurcations and rythms in neural mass models. arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.2718 , 2009

    2009 arXiv

  20. [28]

    van Rotterdam, F

    A. van Rotterdam, F. H. L. da Silva, J. van den Ende, M. A. Viergever, and A. J. Hermans. A model of the spatial-temporal characteristics of the alpha rhythm. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology , 44(2):283–305, Mar. 1982. ISSN 1522-9602. doi: 10.1007/bf02463252. 32

    1982 doi

  21. [29]

    Wechselberger

    M. Wechselberger. Canards. Scholarpedia, 2(4):1356, 2007. doi: 10. 4249/scholarpedia.1356

    2007

  22. [30]

    Wendling, J.-J

    F. Wendling, J.-J. Bellanger, F. Bartolomei, and P. Chauvel. Relevance of nonlinear lumped-parameter models in the analysis of depth-EEG epileptic signals. Biological Cybernetics, 83(4):367–378, 2000. doi: 10. 1007/s004220000160

  23. [31]

    H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal, 12(1): 1–24, 1972. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86068-5. 33

    1972 doi

  24. [1987]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00317988

    doi

  25. [2020]

    doi: 10.1162/netn a 00130

    doi

  26. [2023]

    doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-22007-4

    ISBN 978-3-031-22007-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-22007-4

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.