Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A weak electric field can destroy the orbitally ordered state of the Mott insulator Ca2RuO4, driving dxy and dxz/dyz occupations toward inversion without structural change.

desk verdict The electric-field orbital-collapse 'robust' window is about half the Peierls driving period, so the central new claim doesn't hold; the review parts are solid but derivative. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16472 v1 pith:IJEQBXYX submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.str-el

Giuseppe Cuono , Filomena Forte , Alfonso Romano , Canio Noce This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords MottinsulatorCa2RuO4orbitalorderelectricfieldcontrolaltermagnetismnegativethermalexpansionspin-orbitalcorrelationstime-dependentexactdiagonalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ca2RuO4, a layered Mott insulator (an insulator created by electron repulsion rather than band filling), is shown to be a material whose orbital order can be switched by an electric field far weaker than the Mott gap. In a two-site Ru-O-Ru cluster evolved unitarily under a Peierls-coupled field, E = $10^{-6}$ eV/Å (about 1.6 kV/cm) drives the ground state from xy-dominated occupation to strong orbital fluctuations with near population inversion between dxy and the dxz/dyz pair, and the collapsed regime persists on a nanosecond timescale without structural change. The same first-principles and cluster calculations lead the paper to two further conclusions: Ca2RuO4 is an orbital-selective altermagnet, with non-relativistic spin-splitting confined to the dxz/dyz bands, and its negative thermal expansion can arise from spin-orbital correlations that make the optimal Ru-O-Ru bond angle increase with temperature. The reason to care is the control knob: if the electric-field mechanism is right, orbital and magnetic order in a correlated insulator can be manipulated electrically rather than by heat, pressure, or doping.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-site Ru-O-Ru cluster Hamiltonian, which combines t2g Coulomb interactions ($U$), Hund's coupling ($J_H$), tetragonal crystal field ($\Delta_{\rm CF}$), and spin-orbit coupling ($\lambda$) with Slater-Koster p-d hoppings. The electric field enters through a Peierls phase factor that multiplies the Ru-O hopping, and the many-body ground state is advanced in time with the unitary Crank-Nicolson propagator. Tracking the time-dependent occupancies $n_{xy}$ and $(n_{xz}+n_{yz})/2$ is what reveals the orbital hardening-collapse-softening changeover. For the other two results the machinery differs: the altermagnetism claim rests on GGA+U band structure, and the negative-thermal-expansion claim on exact diagonalization of the same cluster with free energy minimized over the TM-O-TM bond angle $\theta$.

What would settle it

Time-resolve the orbital occupation of Ca2RuO4 while applying a ~1.6 kV/cm pulse, for example via x-ray absorption or resonant inelastic scattering at the Ru L edge; the claim is falsified if no dxy-to-dxz/dyz population inversion appears on the nanosecond scale. A computational falsifier is to add a phonon mode or a reservoir to the cluster model and check whether the collapse lifetime drops below a nanosecond or the inversion disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central new assertion is that a weak electric field destroys the equilibrium orbitally ordered state of Ca2RuO4. At zero field the ground state of the model has the doublon mainly in dxy, with occupations $(n_{xy}, n_z) \approx (1.6, 1.2)$; with $E = 10^{-6}$ eV/Å the system evolves into strong orbital fluctuations in which the xy and z configurations nearly invert, an 'orbital collapse' the paper says persists for a window of order nanoseconds. At larger fields the fluctuations accelerate to picosecond scale and the suppression of orbital imbalance is only partial, giving a hardening-collapse-softening sequence. The authors present this as evidence that the spin-orbital correlations of the Mott state can be modulated without structural distortions, and argue the resulting magnetic frustration can suppress antiferromagnetic correlations. The paper also establishes, from GGA+U band calculations, that the altermagnetic spin-splitting is orbital-selective, and from exact diagonalization of the TM-O-TM cluster that spin-orbital correlations can drive negative thermal expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two-site Ru-O-Ru cluster, evolving unitarily with no coupling to the lattice or a thermal reservoir, faithfully represents the bulk nonequilibrium response of Ca2RuO4; if the omitted dissipation or finite-size effects destroy the nanosecond orbital collapse, the central claim fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A field of about 1.6 kV/cm should be able to suppress the xy-dominated orbital order in Ca2RuO4 without the c-axis expansion that the equilibrium unpolarized state requires.
  • Suppressing the orbital imbalance is expected to weaken antiferromagnetic correlations, potentially driving magnetic frustration or a transition in the driven state.
  • Because the collapse persists for nanoseconds, electric-field pulses become a candidate route to switching orbital order on timescales shorter than thermal or structural relaxation.
  • The orbital-selective altermagnetism implies that electron-doped Ca2RuO4 should show spin-split dxz/dyz bands while the dxy sector remains degenerate, which could be accessed by spin-resolved photoemission.
  • The NTE mechanism suggests that tuning Hund's coupling and p-d hybridization, for example by 3d substitution, can control whether the bond angle increases or decreases with temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the two-site cluster has no dissipation or lattice relaxation, so the nanosecond persistence is best read as a prediction for an idealized isolated unit; coupling to phonons or a reservoir could shorten the collapse or turn it into a transient that never reaches steady state.
  • Beyond the paper: because the field is about two orders of magnitude below typical breakdown fields of Mott insulators, the mechanism, if it survives in a bulk description, would separate orbital switching from avalanche dielectric breakdown.
  • Beyond the paper: a direct computational test would be to extend the cluster to a longer chain or a 2D cluster; if the population inversion disappears or its lifetime drops sharply, the orbital collapse is a finite-size effect rather than a bulk nonequilibrium phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a hybrid review/original study of Ca2RuO4. It reviews the crystal and electronic structure, presents GGA+U band structures showing orbital-selective altermagnetism in the dxz/dyz sector, reviews a cluster exact-diagonalization theory of negative thermal expansion, and adds a new two-site Ru-O-Ru calculation in which a constant electric field is introduced via a Peierls phase and the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is solved with the Crank-Nicolson method. The central new claim is that a weak field (E = 10^-6 eV/Å) drives a nanosecond-lived orbital collapse with suppressed dxy versus dxz/dyz imbalance, potentially weakening antiferromagnetism without structural change.

Significance. If the electric-field result were established, it would be a notable step toward electrical control of orbital order in a Mott insulator, with clear experimental relevance given the recent current-induced transitions in Ca2RuO4. The authors are transparent about their finite cluster, use exact diagonalization and unitary time evolution, benchmark parameters against RIXS and neutron spectra, and make an in-principle falsifiable prediction of a field scale and timescale. I do not regard the parameter calibration as circular; it is a standard modeling strategy. The limiting issue is the evidence for robustness of the predicted phase: the calculation is a closed finite-system transient, and the reported timescale is comparable to the driving period of the Peierls phase. The altermagnetism and NTE sections are largely confirmatory of previous work, so the electric-field section carries the paper's novelty.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.2, Eq. (5)] The central robustness claim that the orbital-collapse regime 'persists in a window of time of the order of nanosecond' is not established by the evidence shown. For a constant field introduced through A(t)=Et, the Peierls phase on a Ru-O bond is eEd t / ħ. With E = 10^-6 eV/Å and d ≈ 2 Å, this phase has period 2πħ/(eEd) ≈ 2 ns, so the reported ~1 ns collapse window is comparable to one half-period of coherent Bloch-like oscillation in a finite isolated cluster. Because Eq. (6) is a unitary evolution with no dissipation, no lattice coupling, and no reservoir, and because the authors themselves state that 'we cannot reach a steady state due to the finite size of the investigated cluster', the simulation cannot distinguish a persistent collapsed phase from a transient that reverses on the field's own timescale. The abstract's phrase 'non-equilibrium steady state' is also not supported by the calculation. I request longer-time simulations or an explicit dissipative/lattice-coupled calculation, and a correspondingly softened claim if the reversal is found.
  2. [Sections 5.1 and 5.2, Eq. (1)] The conclusion that the electric field destroys orbital order 'without requiring structural changes' is not demonstrated by this model. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) contains no electron-lattice coupling, and the Ru-O-Ru geometry is held fixed during the time evolution; the structural rigidity is an input, not an outcome. A model that excludes lattice degrees of freedom cannot rule out a structural response, especially on the nanosecond timescale claimed. The conclusion should be limited to a rigid-cluster model, or supplemented by a calculation that includes lattice relaxation or electron-phonon coupling.
  3. [Section 5.2 and Conclusions] The magnetic part of the central claim is not computed. The time evolution in Sec. 5.2 tracks only the orbital occupations n_xy and (n_xz+n_yz)/2; no spin-spin correlation function, staggered magnetization, or magnetic-order parameter is evaluated. Statements in the abstract and conclusions that the field 'may reduce antiferromagnetism' or induce magnetic frustration are therefore conjectural. If they are to remain in the abstract, they should be supported by explicit spin observables from the same cluster calculation, or they should be presented as speculation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2] The paragraph beginning 'When higher temperatures are considered...' is repeated verbatim after Fig. 4; please delete the duplicate.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The Crank-Nicolson approximation as typeset appears to be missing a division symbol or bracket between the numerator and denominator; please correct the expression.
  3. [Sections 4.2, 5.2, and Appendix] The crystal-field parameter is denoted Δ_CF in Sec. 5.2 but δ in Sec. 4.2 and the Appendix; define the relationship explicitly to avoid confusion.
  4. [Section 3.2] The DFT altermagnetism section would be strengthened by a short statement on convergence or error (k-point and U dependence) and by a quantitative comparison with the earlier LDA+DMFT calculations, since the presented result largely reproduces Ref. [29].
  5. [Section 5.2] Please report the electric-field amplitude also in SI units: E = 10^-6 eV/Å corresponds to 10^4 V/m = 100 V/cm, which would help readers connect to the experimental 40 V/cm scale mentioned in Sec. 5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the electric-field orbital dynamics is computed from a benchmarked model, not fitted, and self-citations are to independent archival prior work.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are a GGA+U altermagnetism calculation using experimental lattice constants, a review of negative-thermal-expansion results previously published in Ref. [6], and a new nonequilibrium calculation of orbital occupation under a Peierls-substituted two-site Hamiltonian. The model parameters in Sec. 5.2 are explicitly benchmarked against external resonant inelastic x-ray and neutron scattering spectra ("parameters ... are used as benchmarks for the study"), so the electric-field response is not a re-expression of a fitted target. The time evolution is governed by Eqs. (5)-(6) with no parameter adjusted to produce the orbital collapse; the collapse is an output of unitary propagation of the fixed ground state, not an input. Self-citations to Refs. [55-57], [6], and [69] are archival prior work and are not used to forbid alternative mechanisms or to define the predicted quantity in terms of itself. The reported nanosecond window may be physically fragile because the cluster is finite, unitary, and without dissipation, and the authors themselves state that "we cannot reach a steady state"; however, that is a validity and robustness concern, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The electric-field result depends on a multi-orbital model with many parameters fitted to experimental spectra rather than derived from first principles; the DFT section also fixes U by hand. No code or input files are shipped, and the small cluster is a modeling axiom rather than an ab initio prediction.

free parameters (7)
  • U (Ru Coulomb repulsion) = 3 eV (DFT), 2.0-2.2 eV (model)
    Chosen to capture the Mott gap and to reproduce experimental spectra; not derived from first principles.
  • JH (Hund coupling) = 0.15 U (DFT), 0.35-0.5 eV (model)
    Set to standard ratios in the DFT, and scanned/benchmarked in the exact diagonalization.
  • Delta_CF (crystal field splitting) = 200-300 meV
    Taken from fits to resonant inelastic x-ray and neutron scattering spectra.
  • lambda (spin-orbit coupling) = 0.075 eV
    Assumed benchmark value for Ca2RuO4.
  • Vpd_sigma, Vpd_pi (p-d hybridization) = 1.6 eV, 1.3 eV
    Assumed to reproduce the hybridization regime; varied in Fig. 12 but fixed in the time evolution.
  • delta, delta_ort (crystal field splittings) = 0.25 eV, 0.09 eV
    Tetragonal and orthorhombic splitting parameters assumed in the model.
  • Electric field amplitude = 10^-6 to 10^-3 eV/Å
    Scanned amplitudes; the central claim concerns the weak-field regime.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The two-site Ru-O-Ru cluster with one oxygen bridge captures the essential spin-orbital correlations of bulk Ca2RuO4.
    The electric-field calculation (Sec. 5.1-5.2) is performed on a cluster of two Ru and one O; bulk behavior is inferred from this small system.
  • domain assumption Peierls substitution with A(t)=Et describes a constant uniform electric field on a finite cluster.
    Used in Eq. (5) to couple the field; gauge choice may not be valid for a finite open cluster without periodic boundary conditions.
  • domain assumption The A-centered antiferromagnetic order with moments along b is the correct ground state symmetry for the altermagnetism calculation.
    DFT spin splitting is computed for the A-centered AFM configuration, based on experiments [14,31]; the B-centered phase between 110-150 K is ignored.
  • domain assumption Unitary time evolution without dissipation approximates the nonequilibrium behavior.
    The authors use exact Crank-Nicolson evolution and note no steady state is reached; they infer nanosecond persistence without coupling to a bath.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IJEQBXYX

@misc{pith2026241116472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IJEQBXYX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16472}
}
read the original abstract

The Mott insulator Ca2RuO4 is a paradigmatic example among transition metal oxides, where the interplay of charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom leads to competing quantum phases. In this paper, we focus on and review some key aspects, from the underlying physical framework and its basic properties, to recent theoretical efforts that aim to trigger unconventional quantum ground states, using several external parameters and stimuli. Using first-principle calculations, we demonstrate that Ca2RuO4 shows a spin splitting in the reciprocal space, and identify it as an altermagnetic candidate material. The non relativistic spin-splitting has an orbital selective nature, dictated by the local crystallographic symmetry. Next, we consider two routes that may trigger exotic quantum states. The first one corresponds to transition metal substitution of the 4d4 Ru with isovalent 3d3 ions. This substitutional doping may alter the spin-orbital correlations favoring the emergence of negative thermal expansion. The second route explores fledgling states arising in a nonequilibrium steady state under the influence of an applied electric field. We show that the electric field can directly affect the orbital density, eventually leading to strong orbital fluctuations and the suppression of orbital imbalance, which may, in turn, reduce antiferromagnetism. These aspects suggest possible practical applications, as its unique properties may open up possibilities for augmenting existing technologies, surpassing the limitations of conventional materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16472 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Crystal structure of Ca2RuO4. and rSr = 1.31 ˚A) leads in Ca2RuO4 to substantial deviations from this configuration. Actually, with respect to the ideal tetragonal structure (a=b, c), the RuO6 octahedra show alternating rotations about the direction, say z, of the apical Ru-O2 bond, together with tilts of z with respect to the a-b plane initially containing the Ru-O1 bonds (x and y axes), and distortions making x an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Upper panel: temperature dependence of the ab-plane resistivity. Middle panel: temperature dependence of the c-axis lattice constant. Lower panel: temperature dependence of the a- and b-axis lattice constants. The vertical dotted line corresponds to metal-to-insulator transition temperature TMIT = 357 K (adapted with permission from Ref. [11], copyrighted by the American Physical Society). two orbitals of the eg dou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Energy levels of the Ru 4d orbitals as splitted by the Jahn-Teller effect; (b) RuO6 fundamental crystal unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) RuO6 unit and t2g levels occupation in the insulating and in the metallic phase ((a) and (b), respectively). Blue and red arrows are used to distinguish spin-up and spin-down electrons. It is well established that the low-energy properties of Ca2RuO4 are determined…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spin configuration in the A-centered mode antiferromagnetic phase developing below TN = 110 K (adapted with permission from Ref.[31], copyrighted by the Physical Society of Japan). A further relevant element affecting the electronic properties of Ca2RuO4 is the spin-or…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Symmetries of the irreducible Brillouin zone for the orthorhombic Ca2RuO4. With the subscripts 1 and 2 we indicate the k-points that have opposite non-relativistic spin-splitting along the path leading to the Γ point. The dashed arrows indicate one possible path where …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Band structure of Ca2RuO4 along the high-symmetry path R1-Γ-R2 plotted in the energy range from -0.5 to 1.2 eV. (b) Magnification of the band structure shown in panel (a) in the energy range between -0.2 to -0.5 eV. (c) Same as in panel (b) in the energy range betw…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Local densities of states for the t2g orbitals of the Ru atoms. Those associated with the dxz/dyz and with the dxy orbitals are plotted in red and green, respectively. We report the LDOSs for the spin-up subsector with positive values, and those for the spin-down subse…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Band structure of Ca2RuO4 along the high-symmetry path U1-Γ-U2 plotted in the energy range from -1.5 to 1.2 eV. The Fermi level is set to zero energy. spin-splitting only for some bands, thus showing a very peculiar orbital-selective form of altermagnetism. It is impor…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Band structure of Ca2RuO4 along the high-symmetry line Γ-S plotted in the energy range from -3 to 3 eV. The band structure does not present non-relativistic spin-splitting along this line. The Fermi level is set to zero energy. how orbital-dependent magnetic correlati…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: TM1-O-TM2 bond for undistorted configuration, i. e. for vanishing bond angle θ (panel (a)), and for distorted configuration with θ ̸= 0 (panel (b)). In panel (c) it is shown that a thermal gradient, which causes an increase in the bond angle, results in a reduction of…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Zero-temperature contour map of the optimal TM(d 4 )−O−TM(d 4 ) bond angle as a function of the p-d hybridization parameters {Vpdσ, Vpdπ} for U = 2.3 eV, JH = 0.5 eV and εx,y,z = −4.5 eV. (b) Dependence of the optimal angle on Vpdσ for fixed values of Vpdπ (the va…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Temperature dependence of the bond angles for (a) TM(d 4 )-O-TM(d 4 ) and (b) TM(d 3 )-O-TM(d 4 ) bonds. The curves have been obtained fixing JH = 0.5 eV, for different values of U, as reported in the legend. The other parameters, measured in eV, are Vpdπ = 1.3, Vpdσ …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Evolution of the orbital occupation at the Ru site for a given tetragonal distortion corresponding to ∆CF = 200 meV and electric field ampltitudes (d) E = 10−6 eV/˚A, (e) E = 10−5 eV/˚A, (f) E = 10−3 eV/˚A corresponding to dominant configurations with strong orbital u…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Cuono, R

    G. Cuono, R. M. Sattigeri, J. Skolimowski, and C. Autieri, Orbital-selective altermagnetism and correlation-enhanced spin-splitting in strongly-correlated transition metal oxides, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 586, 171163 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [6]

    Brzezicki, F

    W. Brzezicki, F. Forte, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, and A. M. Ole´ s, Spin-orbital mechanisms for negative thermal expansion in Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104403 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Nakatsuji, S

    S. Nakatsuji, S. Ikeda, and Y. Maeno, Ca2RuO4: New Mott Insulators of Layered Ruthenate , J. Phys. Soc. Japan 66, 1868 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [2]

    Nakatsuji, S

    S. Nakatsuji, S. Ikeda, and Y. Maeno, New layered perovskite ruthenates: Ca 2RuO4, Physica C: Superconductivity 282, 729 (1997)

    work page 1997

  5. [3]

    Nakatsuji and Y

    S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, Quasi-Two-Dimensional Mott Transition System Ca 2−xSrxRuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2666 (2000)

    work page 2000

  6. [4]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism , Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [5]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry , Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Nakamura, M

    F. Nakamura, M. Sakaki, Y. Yamanaka, S. Tamaru, T. Suzuki, and Y. Maeno,Electric-field-induced metal maintained by current of the Mott insulator Ca 2RuO4, Sci. Rep. 3, 2536 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    Okazaki, Y

    R. Okazaki, Y. Nishina, Y. Yasui, F. Nakamura, T. Suzuki, and I. Terasaki, Current-Induced Gap Suppression in the Mott Insulator Ca 2RuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 103702 (2013)

    2013

  2. [9]

    Zhang, Alexander S

    J. Zhang, Alexander S. McLeod, Q. Han, X. Chen, H. A. Bechtel, Z. Yao, S.N. Gilbert Corder, T. Ciavatti, T. H. Tao, M. Aronson, G. L. Carr, M. C. Martin, C. Sow, S. Yonezawa, F. Nakamura, I. Terasaki, D. N. Basov, A. J. Millis, Y. Maeno, and M. Liu, Nano-Resolved Current-Induc...

    2019

  3. [10]

    Gauquelin, F

    N. Gauquelin, F. Forte, D. Jannis, R. Fittipaldi, C. Autieri, G. Cuono, V. Granata, M. Lettieri, C. Noce, F. Miletto-Granozio, A. Vecchione, J. Verbeeck, and M. Cuoco, Pattern Formation by Electric-Field Quench in a Mott Crystal , Nano Lett. 23, 7782 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    C. S. Alexander, G. Cao, V. Dobrosavljevic, S. McCall, J. E. Crow, E. Lochner, and R. P. Guertin, Destruction of the Mott insulating ground state of Ca 2RuO4 by a structural transition , Phys. Rev. B 60, R8422 (1999)

    1999

  5. [12]

    Friedt, M

    O. Friedt, M. Braden, G. Andr´ e, P. Adelmann, S. Nakatsuji, and Y Maeno,Structural and magnetic aspects of the metal-insulator transition in Ca 2−xSrxRuO4, Phys. Rev. B 63, 174432 (2001)

    2001

  6. [13]

    G. Cao, S. McCall, M. Shepard, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Magnetic and transport properties of single-crystal Ca 2RuO4: Relationship to superconducting Sr 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 56, R2916 (1997)

    1997

  7. [14]

    Braden, G

    M. Braden, G. Andr´ e, S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, Crystal and magnetic structure of Ca 2RuO4: Magnetoelastic coupling and the metal-insulator transition , Phys. Rev. B 58, 847 (1998)

    1998

  8. [15]

    G. Cao, S. McCall, V. Dobrosavljevic, C. S. Alexander, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Ground- state instability of the Mott insulator Ca2RuO4: Impact of slight La doping on the metal-insulator transition and magnetic ordering , Phys. Rev. B 61, R5053 (2000)

    2000

  9. [16]

    Cirillo, V

    C. Cirillo, V. Granata, G. Avallone, R. Fittipaldi, C. Attanasio, A. Avella, and A. Vecchione, Emergence of a metallic metastable phase induced by electrical current in Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 100, 235142 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    V. I. Anisimov, I. A. Nekrasov, D. E. Kondakov, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, Orbital-selective Mott-insulator transition in Ca 2−xSrxRuO4, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 191 (2002)

    2002

  11. [18]

    Gorelov, M

    E. Gorelov, M. Karolak, T. O. Wehling, F. Lechermann, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. Pavarini,Nature of the Mott Transition in Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 226401 (2010)

    2010

  12. [19]

    Mizokawa, L

    T. Mizokawa, L. H. Tjeng, G. A. Sawatzky, G. Ghiringhelli, O. Tjernberg, N. B. Brookes, H. Fukazawa, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno, Spin-Orbit Coupling in the Mott Insulator Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077202 (2001)

    2001

  13. [20]

    C. G. Fatuzzo, M. Dantz, S. Fatale, P. Olalde-Velasco, N. E. Shaik, B. Dalla Piazza, S. Toth, J. Pelliciari, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, N. Kikugawa, J. S. Brooks, H. M. Rønnow, M. Grioni, Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4 27 Ch. R¨ uegg, T. Schmitt, an...

    2015

  14. [21]

    Lotze and M

    J. Lotze and M. Daghofer, Suppression of effective spin-orbit coupling by thermal fluctuations in spin-orbit coupled antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045125 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Vergara, M

    I. Vergara, M. Magnaterra, P. Warzanowski, J. Attig, S. Kunkem¨ oller, D. I. Khomskii, M. Braden, M. Hermanns, and M. Gr¨ uninger, Spin-orbit coupling and crystal-field splitting in Ti-doped Ca2RuO4 studied by ellipsometry , Phys. Rev. B 106, 085103 (2022)

    2022

  16. [23]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova,Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets , Sci. Adv. 6, 23 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    Gonzalez Betancourt, J

    R.D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, K. Olejn ´ ık, L.ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S.T.B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlov´ a, J.ˇZelezn´ y, and D. Kriegner,Spontaneous anomalous hall effect arisi...

    2023

  18. [25]

    Bradley, A

    C. Bradley, A. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids: Representation Theory for Point Groups and Space Groups, in: EBSCO ebook academic collection, OUP Oxford, 2010

    2010

  19. [26]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. Cosma Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study , Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    X. Chen, D. Wang, L. Li, and B. Sanyal, Giant spin-splitting and tunable spin-momentum locked transport in room temperature collinear antiferromagnetic semimetallic Ca 2RuO4monolayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 022402 (2023)

    2023

  21. [28]

    Cuono, R

    G. Cuono, R. M. Sattigeri, C. Autieri, and T. Dietl, Ab initio overestimation of the topological region in Eu-based compounds, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075150 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    R. M. Sattigeri, G. Cuono, and C. Autieri, Altermagnetic surface states: towards the observation and utilization of altermagnetism in thin films, interfaces and topological materials , Nanoscale 15, 16998 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Fukazawa and Y

    H. Fukazawa and Y. Maeno, Filling Control of the Mott Insulator Ca 2RuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 70, 460 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    D. G. Porter, V. Granata, F. Forte, S. Di Matteo, M. Cuoco, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, and A. Bombardi, Magnetic anisotropy and orbital ordering in Ca 2RuO4 , Phys. Rev. B 98, 125142 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Zhang and E

    G. Zhang and E. Pavarini, Mott transition, spin-orbit effects, and magnetism in Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075145 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals , Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set , Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  28. [36]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set , Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    Autieri, Antiferromagnetic and xy ferro-orbital order in insulating SrRuO 3 thin films with SrO termination, J

    C. Autieri, Antiferromagnetic and xy ferro-orbital order in insulating SrRuO 3 thin films with SrO termination, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 426004 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Vaugier, H

    L. Vaugier, H. Jiang, and S. Biermann, Hubbard U and Hund exchange J in transition metal oxides: Screening versus localization trends from constrained random phase approximation , Phys. Rev. B 86, 165105 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Etz, I.V

    C. Etz, I.V. Maznichenko, D. B¨ ottcher, J. Henk, A.N. Yaresko, W. Hergert, I.I. Mazin, I. Mertig, and A. Ernst, Indications of weak electronic correlations in SrRuO3 from first-principles Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4 28 calculations, Phys. Rev. B 8...

    2012

  33. [41]

    J. M. Rondinelli, N. M. Caffrey, S. Sanvito, and N. A. Spaldin, Electronic properties of bulk and thin film SrRuO 3: Search for the metal-insulator transition , Phys. Rev. B 78, 155107 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao,Crystal thermal transport in altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y,Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Birk Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Dc Josephson effect in altermagnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 076003 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Huang, X.-Z

    L.-F. Huang, X.-Z. Lu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Tunable Negative Thermal Expansion in Layered Perovskites from Quasi-Two-Dimensional Vibrations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 115901 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Martineck and F

    C. Martineck and F. A. Hummel, Linear Thermal Expansion of Three Tungstates , J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51, 227 (1968)

    1968

  41. [49]

    T. A. Mary, J. S. O. Evans, T. Vogt, and A. W. Sleight, Negative Thermal Expansion from 0.3 to 1050 Kelvin in ZrW 2O8, Science 272, 90 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    Ernst, C

    G. Ernst, C. Broholm, G. R. Kowach, and A. R. Ramirez, Phonon density of states and negative thermal expansion in ZrW 2O8, Nature (London) 396, 147 (1998)

    1998

  43. [51]

    T. F. Qi, O. B. Korneta, S. Parkin, L. E. De Long, P. Schlottmann, and G. Cao, Negative Volume Thermal Expansion Via Orbital and Magnetic Orders in Ca 2Ru1−xCrxO4 (0 < x <0.13), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177203 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    T. F. Qi, O. B. Korneta, S. Parkin, J. Hu, and G. Cao, Magnetic and orbital orders coupled to negative thermal expansion in Mott insulators Ca 2Ru1−xMxO4 (M =Mn and Fe) , Phys. Rev. B 85, 165143 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Takenaka, Y

    K. Takenaka, Y. Okamoto, T. Shinoda, N. Katayama, and Y. Sakai, Colossal negative thermal expansion in reduced layered ruthenate, Nature Commun. 8, 14102 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    N. Z. Koocher, L.-F. Huang, and J. M. Rondinelli, Negative thermal expansion in the Ruddlesden- Popper calcium titanates , Phys. Rev. Materials 5, 053601 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Cuoco, F

    M. Cuoco, F. Forte, and C. Noce, Probing spin-orbital-lattice correlations in 4 d4 systems, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094428 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    Cuoco, F

    M. Cuoco, F. Forte, and C. Noce, Interplay of Coulomb interactions and c-axis octahedra distortions in single-layer ruthenates , Phys. Rev. B 74, 195124 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    Forte, M

    F. Forte, M. Cuoco, and C. Noce, Field-induced orbital patterns in ferromagnetic layered ruthenates, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155104 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    G. Cao, J. Terzic, H. D. Zhao, H. Zheng, L. E. De Long, and P. S. Riseborough, Electrical control of structural and physical properties via strong spin-orbit interactions in Sr 2IrO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 017201 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast switching to a stable hidden topologically protected quantum state in an electronic crystal, Science 344, 177 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    Afanasiev, A

    D. Afanasiev, A. Gatilova, D.J. Groenendijk, B.A. Ivanov, M. Gibert, S. Gariglio, J. Mentink, J. Li, N. Dasari, M. Eckstein, Th. Rasing, A.D. Caviglia, and A.V. Kimel, Ultrafast spin dynamics in photodoped spin-orbit Mott insulator Sr 2IrO4, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021020 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    D. G. Porter, F. Forte, V. Granata, M. Cannavacciuolo, R. Fittipaldi, M. Cuoco, A. Bombardi, and A. Vecchione, Guiding antiferromagnetic transitions in Ca 2RuO4, Sci. Rep. 12, 10957 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Steffens, O

    P. Steffens, O. Friedt, P. Alireza, W. G. Marshall, W. Schmidt, F. Nakamura, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Emerging new phases in correlated Mott insulator Ca2RuO4 29 Maeno, R. Lengsdorf, M. M. Abd-Elmeguid, and M. Braden, High-pressure diffraction studies on Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 72, 094...

    2005

  55. [63]

    Nakamura, T

    F. Nakamura, T. Goko, M. Ito, T. Fujita, S. Nakatsuji, H. Fukazawa, Y. Maeno, P. Alireza, D. Forsythe, and S. R. Julian, From Mott insulator to ferromagnetic metal: A pressure study of Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 65, 220402 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Ricc` o, M

    S. Ricc` o, M. Kim, A. Tamai, S. McKeown Walker, F. Y. Bruno, I. Cucchi, E. Cappelli, C. Besnard, T. K. Kim, P. Dudin, M. Hoesch, M. J. Gutmann, A. Georges, R. S. Perry, and F. Baumberger,In situ strain tuning of the metal-insulator-transition of Ca 2RuO4 in angle-resolved pho...

    2018

  57. [65]

    Taguchi, T.Matsumoto, and Y

    Y. Taguchi, T.Matsumoto, and Y. Tokura, Dielectric breakdown of one-dimensional Mott insulators Sr 2CuO3 and SrCuO 2, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7015 (2000)

    2000

  58. [66]

    Bertinshaw, N

    J. Bertinshaw, N. Gurung, P. Jorba, H. Liu, M. Schmid, D. T. Mantadakis, M. Daghofer, M. Krautloher, A. Jain, G. H. Ryu, O. Fabelo, P. Hansmann, G. Khaliullin, C. Pfleiderer, B. Keimer, and B. J. Kim, Unique Crystal Structure of Ca 2RuO4 in the Current Stabilized Semimetallic ...

    2019

  59. [67]

    Curcio, C

    D. Curcio, C. E. Sanders, A. Chikina, H. E. Lund,1 M. Bianchi, V. Granata, M. Cannavacciuolo, G. Cuono, C. Autieri, F. Forte, G. Avallone, A. Romano, M. Cuoco, P. Dudin, J. Avila, C. Polley, T. Balasubramanian, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, and P. Hofmann, Current-driven insula...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Sutter, C

    D. Sutter, C. G. Fatuzzo, S. Moser, M. Kim, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, V. Granata, Y. Sassa, F. Cossalter, G. Gatti, M. Grioni, H. M. Ronnow, N. C. Plumb, C. E. Matt, M. Shi, M. Hoesch, T. K. Kim, T. R. Chang, H. T. Jeng, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, A. Georges, T....

    2017

  61. [69]

    Cuono and C

    G. Cuono and C. Autieri, Mott Insulator Ca 2RuO4 under External Electric Field , Materials 15, 6657 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Noce and A

    C. Noce and A. Romano, Rotationally invariant parametrization of Coulomb interactions in multi- orbital Hubbard models, Phys. Status Solidi B 251, 907 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem , Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954)

    1954

  64. [72]

    Brzezicki, C

    W. Brzezicki, C. Noce, A. Romano, and M. Cuoco, Zigzag and Checkerboard Magnetic Patterns in Orbitally Directional Double-Exchange Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 247002 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.