Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Using virtual reality to enhance mobility, safety, and equity for persons with vision loss in urban environments

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Simulated vision loss in VR made urban planners far more aware of accessibility barriers.

desk verdict A well-built VR workshop report whose effectiveness claim outstrips the evidence; useful implementation detail, but no inferential support. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16916 v1 pith:3W4ILL4J submitted 2024-11-25 cs.HC

F. S. Ricci , C. K. Ukegbu , A. Krassner , S. Hazarika , J. White , M. Porfiri , J.R. Rizzo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords virtualrealityvisionlossaccessibilityinclusivedesignurbanplanningexperientiallearningempathyworkshopevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports on a workshop in which staff of the New York City Department of Transportation put on VR headsets and navigated a simulated NYC street while experiencing simulated versions of three common eye conditions: age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma, at mild, moderate, and severe levels. The aim is to establish that this kind of first-person simulation can make accessibility problems tangible to the people who design streets, and thereby improve how vision-loss considerations enter urban design. Comparing questionnaires given before and after the session, the authors report large gains in participants' self-rated confidence about blindness and low vision, awareness of design guidelines, and willingness to consider vision-loss needs in future work. If those self-reports reflect real change, the workshop offers city agencies a low-cost way to build empathy and to test design interventions before any concrete is poured.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the custom VR simulation itself: a Unity-built virtual urban environment modeled on real NYC locations, displayed through an Oculus Quest headset, with vision-loss effects produced by Gaussian-blur and distortion shaders combined with culling masks that selectively render parts of the scene. That setup reproduces central-vision loss for age-related macular degeneration, scattered dark spots and blur for diabetic retinopathy, and tunnel vision for glaucoma, while egocentric audio cues give users spatial information about traffic, cyclists, and people nearby. The argument runs through this mechanism: the embodied, first-person encounter with these visual conditions is what converts abstract accessibility guidelines into felt experience, which the questionnaires then measure.

What would settle it

Run the same workshop with two groups: one that experiences the immersive VR simulation and one that watches a recorded walkthrough of the same environment with the same explanations, then compare identical questionnaires; if the recorded group shows equal gains, immersion is not the causal ingredient, and the paper's central mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that immersive VR simulation of vision loss is an effective experiential-learning tool for urban design professionals. Participants chose among three simulated conditions and three severity levels, then walked through a virtual environment modeled on challenging NYC streetscapes and stocked with bollards, construction sites, scaffolding, benches, traffic, cyclists, and spatialized audio cues. On pre/post Likert questionnaires, the share of participants rating themselves 'quite' or 'extremely' confident about the definitions of blindness and low vision rose from 10% to 65%; awareness of relevant design guidelines rose from under 15% to over 50%; confidence about mobility issues rose from under 20% to nearly 70%; and the share who said they would consider vision-loss needs in future work rose from 40% to over 80%. The paper reads these shifts as evidence that the experience deepened knowledge, empathy, and intention, and it presents focus-group and follow-up interview material in which participants endorsed VR as a tool for testing street designs, such as tactile paving, accessible pedestrian signals, and leading pedestrian intervals, before real-world implementation.

Load-bearing premise

The entire result rests on participants' self-ratings on a short questionnaire measuring true learning caused by the VR experience; without a control group, the same improvements could come from social desirability, the novelty of wearing a headset, or a general wish to please the workshop organizers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • City agencies can trial accessibility interventions such as tactile paving, curb ramps, accessible pedestrian signals, and leading pedestrian intervals in VR before building them, avoiding the cost and risk of physical pilots.
  • VR workshops could be embedded in existing safety programs like Street Improvement Projects and the Bus Stops Under the Elevated initiative to train staff who make street-level decisions.
  • The same simulation could be extended to a continuum of vision loss, including gradual deterioration, and to changing conditions such as time of day and weather, making designs more resilient.
  • If the reported intention to consider vision-loss needs persists, professional practice in planning departments could shift toward more inclusive design as a routine default.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same immersion could work in reverse: giving persons with vision loss the ability to walk through proposed designs and flag barriers before construction, turning them from reviewers into co-designers.
  • Beyond the paper, a control condition that watches a recorded walkthrough without wearing the headset would isolate whether embodiment, not just new information, drives the reported gains; without that, the active ingredient is unproven.
  • Beyond the paper, follow-up audits of actual design documents or street plans six to twelve months later would test whether self-reported commitment translates into changed practice.
  • Beyond the paper, co-designing the simulation with persons with vision loss could improve its validity, since simulated visual impairment may not capture the auditory and tactile skills that experienced blind pedestrians develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a virtual reality (VR) workshop in which 11 New York City Department of Transportation staff experienced simulated vision loss (AMD, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma) while navigating a virtual urban environment. Pre- and post-workshop Likert questionnaires, a focus group, and interviews with a Vision Zero Task Force are used to argue that the workshop significantly increased participants' awareness of vision-loss-related challenges, confidence in discussing mobility issues, and intention to consider visual impairment in future design work. The authors conclude that VR is an effective experiential learning platform for advancing accessibility in urban design.

Significance. If the study's central claims were methodologically sound, the work would be a useful contribution to accessibility education for urban planners, with a novel VR simulation design and a real-world stakeholder collaboration. The detailed description of the VR environment (shader-based simulation of three eye conditions, spatial audio, animated traffic) is a genuine strength, and the focus-group/interview material offers qualitative insight into how such workshops are received. However, the quantitative evidence is restricted to unanalyzed self-report percentages from 11 self-selected participants, with no control condition and no inferential statistics. As presented, the paper cannot support the claimed effectiveness of the VR intervention; at most it is a pilot workshop report with suggestive anecdotes.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.1] The paper repeatedly uses 'significant' (e.g., 'Results showed a significant increase in awareness...') without any statistical test. Section 3.1 reports raw percentage changes from 11 participants, but provides no p-values, confidence intervals, or paired-test results. With n=11, these percentage changes are highly imprecise, and the word 'significant' is therefore not justified by the data. This is load-bearing because the paper's central claim, stated in the abstract and Section 5, is that the VR workshop 'demonstrates effectiveness.'
  2. [Section 2.4 and Tables 1-2] Two of the pre/post comparisons in Section 3.1 are based on non-identical items. Pre-questionnaire Q4 asks 'Do you consider persons with visual impairment needs when designing spaces?', whereas post-questionnaire Q4 asks 'Would you consider what you learnt in your future work?'. Pre Q6 asks about awareness of VR for 'testing design guidelines', whereas post Q6 asks about awareness of VR for 'training mobility'. The reported increases for these items conflate the intervention effect with changes in question wording, so the corresponding percentage changes (e.g., 40% to 80% for 'consider needs') cannot be interpreted as pre/post change in the same construct.
  3. [Sections 2.3, 3.1, and 5] The causal claim that the VR experience 'effectively deepened comprehension' and 'fostered empathy and a long-term commitment' (Section 3.1) is unsupported by the absence of a control condition. Participants were self-selected DOT staff who were told the workshop was designed to raise awareness; social desirability, demand characteristics, and the novelty of VR are all plausible explanations for the observed self-reported improvements. The conclusion in Section 5 that 'this study demonstrates that VR technology holds significant promise' overreaches: the design cannot rule out these alternative explanations, and the manuscript does not acknowledge this limitation.
  4. [Section 3.2 and 4] The focus group and interview findings are presented as 'corroborating' the questionnaire results, but no systematic qualitative analysis (e.g., coding scheme, thematic analysis, inter-rater reliability) is reported. Quotations and paraphrases are used selectively, and the interviews were conducted with a different group (Vision Zero Task Force) than the workshop participants, making them even less informative as evidence for the workshop's effects. The manuscript should either provide a rigorous qualitative analysis or explicitly label these as anecdotal.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'VL and and related immersive mobility challenges' should read 'VL and related immersive mobility challenges.'
  2. [Section 2.2] The text says the platform was designed 'to home a comprehensive understanding'; 'home' should be 'hone' (or 'develop').
  3. [Section 2.3 and Figure 5] The text refers to 'Fig. 5c' ('see Fig. 5c') for the ABOUT button, but Figure 5 has only panels (a) and (b). Please correct the cross-reference or add the missing panel.
  4. [References] Several citations appear mismatched to their context: reference [40] (Giudice & Legge, 2008) is cited for the claim that VR offers unique advantages in educating users about urban accessibility, but the cited work concerns blind navigation and technology more broadly; reference [51] (Krull & Duart on mobile learning) is cited to support VR's ability to enhance urban planning processes. Please verify and replace with more directly relevant references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the study's empirical self-report outcome is not constructed from its inputs, though its validity is limited by design.

full rationale

This paper contains no mathematical derivation chain whose output is equivalent to its input. The central claim is that a VR workshop improved participants' self-reported awareness, confidence, and intended future practice (Section 3.1). That claim is an empirical interpretation of pre/post questionnaire percentages, not a quantity computed from a fitted parameter or from a definition that smuggles in the result. There is no model, no equation linking the intervention to the outcome, and no fitted value that is later renamed as a prediction. The main threats to the conclusion are methodological rather than circular: no control group, n=11, no inferential statistics, possible demand characteristics and social desirability, and two pre/post items that are not identically worded (pre Q4 asks about current consideration of VL needs; post Q4 asks about considering what was learned in future work; pre Q6 asks about awareness of VR for testing design guidelines; post Q6 asks about awareness of VR for training mobility). These are validity concerns about whether the self-reported changes are real and caused by the VR simulation, not instances of the paper's argument reducing to its own assumptions. One self-citation (reference [17], Rizzo et al.) appears in the introduction as background on visual impairment as a global health priority and is not load-bearing for the workshop evaluation. Accordingly, no circularity step meets the required standard of quoting a specific reduction in which a claimed result is identical to its input by construction. The honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions depend on four unverified domain assumptions about measurement validity, simulation fidelity, response bias, and sample representativeness. There are no fitted parameters or invented entities. The honesty of the ledger is in exposing that the empirical claims rest on these assumptions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Self-reported awareness, confidence, and intention to change are valid measures of actual learning and future design behavior.
    The outcome measures are 1-5 Likert self-assessments with no objective knowledge test, behavioral observation, or follow-up data; this is the central measurement assumption in Sections 2.4 and 3.1.
  • domain assumption The Unity shader and culling-mask simulations faithfully reproduce the visual experience of AMD, DR, and glaucoma.
    The simulation is constructed from standard graphical effects but is not validated against clinical measures or by persons with VL; realism is assumed in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption Participants' responses are not biased by social desirability, demand characteristics, or the novelty of VR.
    The pre/post design and non-anonymous workshop setting make this assumption vulnerable; no control exists to test it.
  • domain assumption A convenience sample of 11 NYC DOT staff supports generalization to urban planners and designers broadly.
    The sample is small, self-selected, and drawn from one agency, yet the discussion generalizes to professional practice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Using virtual reality to enhance mobility, safety, and equity for persons with vision loss in urban environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3W4ILL4J

@misc{pith2026241116916,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Using virtual reality to enhance mobility, safety, and equity for persons with vision loss in urban environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3W4ILL4J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16916}
}
read the original abstract

This study explores the use of virtual reality (VR) as an innovative tool to enhance awareness, acceptance, and understanding of accessibility for persons with vision loss (VL). Through a VR-based workshop developed in collaboration with New York City's Department Of Transportation, participants experienced immersive simulations of VL and and related immersive mobility challenges. The methodology included pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, assessing changes in participants' knowledge, confidence, and perception. Participants included urban planners, designers, and architects. Results showed a significant increase in awareness of VL-related challenges that affect design guidelines, as well as improved confidence in addressing such challenges. Participants also expressed strong support for VR as a pedagogical tool, noting its potential for reshaping professional practices, improving capacity building, and enhancing inclusive design. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of VR as an experiential learning platform, fostering empathy and a long-term commitment to integrating VL considerations into urban design. These findings highlight the transformative potential of VR in advancing equity and accessibility in urban environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Research in Transportation Business & Management 40, 100592 (2021)

    Campisi, T., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Tesoriere, G., Torrisi, V.: Evaluation of walkability and mobility requirements of visually impaired people in urban spaces. Research in Transportation Business & Management 40, 100592 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Sensors21(9), 3103 (2021)

    El-Taher, F.E.-Z., Taha, A., Courtney, J., Mckeever, S.: A systematic review of urban navigation systems for visually impaired people. Sensors21(9), 3103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 15(1), 1–26 (2022)

    Mountapmbeme, A., Okafor, O., Ludi, S.: Addressing accessibility barriers in programming for people with visual impairments: A literature review. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 15(1), 1–26 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Transport Reviews 42(2), 181–203 (2022)

    Park, J., Chowdhury, S.: Towards an enabled journey: barriers encountered by public transport riders with disabilities for the whole journey chain. Transport Reviews 42(2), 181–203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 15(2), 1–44 (2022)

    M¨ uller, K., Engel, C., Loitsch, C., Stiefelhagen, R., Weber, G.: Traveling more independently: a study on the diverse needs and challenges of people with visual or mobility impairments in unfamiliar indoor environments. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 15(2), 1–44 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 312 (2022)

    Upadhyay, V., Balakrishnan, M.: Inclusive framework for indoor accessibility in low resource settings for persons with visual disability. The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 312 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 19(3), 604–622 (2024)

    Kapsalis, E., Jaeger, N., Hale, J.: Disabled-by-design: effects of inaccessible urban public spaces on users of mobility assistive devices–a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 19(3), 604–622 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    In: The Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People, pp

    Little, S.: Experiential accessibility: A therapeutic approach to the design of the public realm. In: The Routledge Handbook of Designing Public Spaces for Young People, pp. 64–79. Routledge, ??? (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4(3), 1–22 (2020)

    Kayukawa, S., Ishihara, T., Takagi, H., Morishima, S., Asakawa, C.: Guiding blind pedestrians in public spaces by understanding walking behavior of nearby pedes- trians. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4(3), 1–22 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 13(2), 1–47 (2020)

    May, K.R., Tomlinson, B.J., Ma, X., Roberts, P., Walker, B.N.: Spotlights and soundscapes: On the design of mixed reality auditory environments for persons with visual impairment. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 13(2), 1–47 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the 18 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Gupta, M., Abdolrahmani, A., Edwards, E., Cortez, M., Tumang, A., Majali, Y., Lazaga, M., Tarra, S., Patil, P., Kuber, R.,et al.: Towards more universal wayfind- ing technologies: Navigation preferences across disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 18 2020 CHI Conference on Huma...

    2020

  4. [12]

    ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 13(3), 94 (2024)

    Wabi´ nski, J., ´Smiechowska-Petrovskij, E.: Evaluation of qualitative colour palettes for tactile maps. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 13(3), 94 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Sustainability 12(3), 1096 (2020)

    Mattsson, P., Johansson, M., Alm´ en, M., Laike, T., Marcheschi, E., St ˚ ahl, A.: Improved usability of pedestrian environments after dark for people with vision impairment: An intervention study. Sustainability 12(3), 1096 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 116(2), 216–229 (2022)

    Hauck, N., Mahdavi, A.: An investigation of the implications of visual impairment for illumination requirements. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 116(2), 216–229 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    PhD thesis, The University of Western Ontario (Canada) (2023)

    Ibe, C.: ” take a walk in my shoes”: A narrative account of the experiences of community mobility among older adults living with age-related vision loss (arvl). PhD thesis, The University of Western Ontario (Canada) (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Town Planning Review 94(1), 11– 35 (2023)

    Cushley, L., Galway, N., Peto, T.: The unseen barriers of the built environment: navigation for people with visual impairment. Town Planning Review 94(1), 11– 35 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Taylor & Francis (2023)

    Rizzo, J.-R., Beheshti, M., Hudson, T.E., Mongkolwat, P., Riewpaiboon, W., Seiple, W., Ogedegbe, O.G., Vedanthan, R.: The global crisis of visual impair- ment: an emerging global health priority requiring urgent action. Taylor & Francis (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Conboy Russo, J.A.: The lived experience of older adults with visual impairments and their integration into social and recreational activities in the long-term care setting: A phenomenological study (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago (2022)

    Moles, B.: Travel experiences in work and social contexts for adults who are blind or visually impaired. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 50(3), 831–849 (2023)

    Nicoletti, L., Sirenko, M., Verma, T.: Disadvantaged communities have lower access to urban infrastructure. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 50(3), 831–849 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Transport policy 131, 66–74 (2023)

    Levine, K., Karner, A.: Approaching accessibility: Four opportunities to address the needs of disabled people in transportation planning in the united states. Transport policy 131, 66–74 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Handy, S.: Is accessibility an idea whose time has finally come? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 83, 102319 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Annakin, E., Everett, G.: How can the architectural design of public buildings be improved for visually impaired people? (2023) 19

    2023

  16. [24]

    Sensors 24(1), 166 (2023)

    Scalvini, F., Bordeau, C., Ambard, M., Migniot, C., Dubois, J.: Outdoor naviga- tion assistive system based on robust and real-time visual–auditory substitution approach. Sensors 24(1), 166 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    In: International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp

    Pinna, F., Garau, C., Annunziata, A.: A literature review on urban usability and accessibility to investigate the related criteria for equality in the city. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp. 525–541 (2021). Springer

    2021

  18. [26]

    In: International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp

    Pinna, F., Garau, C., Maltinti, F., Coni, M.: Beyond architectural barriers: build- ing a bridge between disability and universal design. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp. 706–721 (2020). Springer

    2020

  19. [27]

    In: Rethinking Disability and Human Rights, pp

    Steinfeld, E.: The space of accessibility and universal design. In: Rethinking Disability and Human Rights, pp. 100–118. Routledge, ??? (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Ophthalmic Epidemiology 30(2), 129–141 (2023)

    Wittenborn, J.S., Gu, Q., Erdem, E., Ahmed, F., Zhang, P., Saaddine, J., Lun- deen, E.A., Rein, D.B.: The prevalence of diagnosis of major eye diseases and their associated payments in the medicare fee-for-service program. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 30(2), 129–141 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    JAMA 331(2), 147–157 (2024)

    Fleckenstein, M., Schmitz-Valckenberg, S., Chakravarthy, U.: Age-related macular degeneration: A review. JAMA 331(2), 147–157 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Chonnam Medical Journal 59(3), 143 (2023)

    Amini, M.A., Karbasi, A., Vahabirad, M., Khanaghaei, M., Alizamir, A.: Mecha- nistic insight into age-related macular degeneration (amd): Anatomy, epidemiol- ogy, genetics, pathogenesis, prevention, implications, and treatment strategies to pace amd management. Chonnam Medical...

    2023

  23. [31]

    BMC geriatrics 24(1), 82 (2024)

    K¨ allstrand, J., Lindgren, E., Carlsson, I.: Perpetuating ability to live life as usual: a grounded theory study of persons living with age-related macular degeneration. BMC geriatrics 24(1), 82 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 11(2), 1030 (2024)

    Srivastava, N.: Diabetes and the retinal changes in the eye: a threat to the sight. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 11(2), 1030 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    PhD thesis, Queen’s University Belfast (2023)

    Cushley, L., Hageman, G.: The role of the peripheral retina in diabetic retinopa- thy: from basic science to town planning. PhD thesis, Queen’s University Belfast (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal 19(3), 42–50 (2024)

    Srivastav, Y., Taj, B., Singh, J., Yadav, S., Ahmad, M., et al.: Glaucoma (eye disease) and its associated diagnosis and treatment process: A schematic concise review. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal 19(3), 42–50 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Journal of Clinical Research and Ophthalmology 11(1), 001–004 (2024) 20

    Sahu, M.K.: A review on glaucoma: causes, symptoms, pathogenesis & treatment. Journal of Clinical Research and Ophthalmology 11(1), 001–004 (2024) 20

    2024

  28. [36]

    Eye 37(10), 1993–2006 (2023)

    Deemer, A.D., Goldstein, J.E., Ramulu, P.Y.: Approaching rehabilitation in patients with advanced glaucoma. Eye 37(10), 1993–2006 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    https:// www.nycstreetdesign.info/ (2022)

    New York City Department of Transportation: Street Design Manual. https:// www.nycstreetdesign.info/ (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/ pedestrian-safety-older-new-yorkers.pdf (2023)

    New York City Department of Transportation: Pedestrian Safety and Older New Yorkers. https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/ pedestrian-safety-older-new-yorkers.pdf (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Computers & Electrical Engineering 93, 107272 (2021)

    Villalba, ´E.E., Az´ ocar, A.L.S.M., Jacques-Garc ´ ıa, F.A.: State of the art on immer- sive virtual reality and its use in developing meaningful empathy. Computers & Electrical Engineering 93, 107272 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    The engineering handbook of smart technology for aging, disability, and independence, 479–500 (2008)

    Giudice, N.A., Legge, G.E.: Blind navigation and the role of technology. The engineering handbook of smart technology for aging, disability, and independence, 479–500 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    Cyberpsychology & behavior 8(3), 220–230 (2005)

    Riva, G.: Virtual reality in psychotherapy. Cyberpsychology & behavior 8(3), 220–230 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    American journal of health promotion 25(1), 40–47 (2010)

    Winters, M., Teschke, K.: Route preferences among adults in the near market for bicycling: Findings of the cycling in cities study. American journal of health promotion 25(1), 40–47 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009)

    Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immer- sive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    In: Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, pp

    Yao, T., Yoo, S., Parker, C.: Evaluating virtual reality as a tool for empathic modelling of vision impairment: insights from a simulated public interactive display experience. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, pp. 190–197 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Medycyna Pracy 74(1), 171–185 (2023)

    Pinto-Coelho, L., Laska-Le´ sniewicz, A., Pereira, E.T., Sztobryn-Giercuszkiewicz, J.: Inclusion and adaptation beyond disability: Using virtual reality to foster empathy. Medycyna Pracy 74(1), 171–185 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    In: Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, pp

    Van Leeuwen, J.P., Hermans, K., Jylh¨ a, A., Quanjer, A.J., Nijman, H.: Effec- tiveness of virtual reality in participatory urban planning: A case study. In: Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, pp. 128–136 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    New Media & Society 13(1), 75–95 (2011) 21

    Gordon, E., Manosevitch, E.: Augmented deliberation: Merging physical and vir- tual interaction to engage communities in urban planning. New Media & Society 13(1), 75–95 (2011) 21

    2011

  40. [48]

    Applied Sciences 12(2), 797 (2022)

    Imottesjo, H., Kain, J.-H.: The urban cocreation lab—an integrated platform for remote and simultaneous collaborative urban planning and design through web- based desktop 3d modeling, head-mounted virtual reality and mobile augmented reality: prototyping a minimum viable produ...

    2022

  41. [49]

    JMIR serious games 6(4), 10965 (2018)

    Oing, T., Prescott, J., et al.: Implementations of virtual reality for anxiety-related disorders: systematic review. JMIR serious games 6(4), 10965 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Harvard review of psychiatry 25(3), 103–113 (2017)

    Maples-Keller, J.L., Bunnell, B.E., Kim, S.-J., Rothbaum, B.O.: The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard review of psychiatry 25(3), 103–113 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18(7) (2017) 22

    Krull, G., Duart, J.M.: Research trends in mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review of articles (2011–2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18(7) (2017) 22

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.