Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 45 references

Mono-drive single-sideband modulation via optical delay lines on thin-film lithium niobate

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single RF drive can generate high-quality optical single-sideband signals by using on-chip optical delay lines to supply the 90-degree phase shift that normally requires a second RF signal and electrical hybrid.

desk verdict Mono-drive SSB via optical delay lines is a solid new integration concept, but the CS-SSB headline number is internally swapped and must be corrected before the claim stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17070 v1 pith:BFKC5XXA submitted 2024-11-26 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Yikun Chen , Hanke Feng , Zhenzheng Wang , Ke Zhang , Xiangzhi Xie , Yuansong Zeng , Yujie Ren , Cheng Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords single-sidebandmodulationopticaldelaylinethin-filmlithiumniobateRFphaseshifterMach-Zehndermodulatorcarrier-suppressedSSBfrequencychromaticdispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that a single radio-frequency (RF) drive is enough to generate optical single-sideband (SSB) signals, provided an on-chip optical delay line supplies the effective 90-degree phase shift between the two modulated paths that conventional dual-drive designs get from a second RF signal and an electrical hybrid. The authors demonstrate the idea on thin-film lithium niobate, reporting 22.1 dB suppression of the unwanted sideband for full-carrier SSB and 22.5 dB for carrier-suppressed SSB at 50 GHz. They also show the full-carrier SSB signal avoids the chromatic-dispersion power fading that limits double-sideband links after 5 km of fiber, and that the carrier-suppressed device acts as an optical and RF frequency shifter, down to 1 GHz. If the approach holds at higher frequencies, it removes the costly 90-degree RF hybrids and dual-channel sources that currently cap conventional SSB modulators, and saves half the RF power.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the on-chip optical delay line acting as a photonic RF 90-degree phase shifter. The delay time is set to one quarter of the modulation period, so the two sidebands acquire opposite phase excursions; a thermal phase shifter then aligns the two arms for destructive interference of one sideband and constructive interference of the other. For carrier-suppressed operation, a four-branch topology with an additional bias point suppresses the carrier after the sidebands are canceled. The design leverages the tight bend radii and low-loss waveguides of thin-film lithium niobate to make the delay compact and scalable, and the operating frequency is set simply by the delay-line length.

What would settle it

Measure the sideband suppression spectrum of a fabricated mono-drive SSB modulator with a delay line designed for $f_0$ and verify that the maximum suppression occurs at $f_0$ (within fabrication tolerance) and that the second suppression peak appears near $3f_0$; a systematic offset or a missing secondary peak would indicate that the delay-line phase model or the group-index assumption is incorrect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a photonic delay line can replace the electrical 90-degree phase shifter in an SSB modulator, so that a single RF drive produces a high-quality single-sideband spectrum. In a Mach-Zehnder modulator, the delay line is placed on one arm after the phase modulator; its group delay is set to one quarter of the RF period ($\tau_m/4$), which rotates the relative phases of the upper and lower sidebands by $+\pi/2$ and $-\pi/2$. A thermal phase shifter then tunes the bias so the two arms interfere destructively for one sideband and constructively for the other. The same principle is extended to a four-branch structure that first cancels one sideband and then suppresses the carrier, yielding carrier-suppressed SSB. Measured sideband suppression is 22.1 dB for full-carrier SSB and 22.5 dB for carrier-suppressed SSB at 50 GHz, with a 3 dB suppression bandwidth of about 25% of the center frequency, and the carrier-suppressed device doubles as a frequency shifter, converting a 39–50 GHz optical shift to 1–12 GHz in the electrical domain by beating against a reference sideband generated on the same chip.

Load-bearing premise

The suppression mechanism requires that the fabricated waveguide's group index is close enough to the simulated value that the delay-line length produces an effective RF phase near 90 degrees at the intended frequency; fabrication deviation shifts the operating point, as evidenced by a 25 GHz design peaking at 27 GHz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-drive SSB generation halves RF power consumption and removes the need for a second synchronized RF source or a 90-degree hybrid, simplifying high-frequency transmitters.
  • The photonic delay line scales to higher frequencies simply by shortening the delay length, potentially enabling SSB operation in bands where electrical hybrids are unavailable or lossy.
  • Full-carrier SSB signals generated this way tolerate chromatic dispersion: after 5 km of fiber the SSB link avoids the ~26 GHz fading dip that degrades double-sideband by more than 30 dB.
  • Carrier-suppressed SSB acts as an optical frequency shifter whose shift is set by the RF drive, and when beaten with an on-chip reference gives electrical frequency shifting from 50 GHz down to 1 GHz with about 1 kHz linewidth.
  • The 3 dB suppression bandwidth is about 25% of the center frequency, comparable to the relative bandwidth of an RF branch-line hybrid coupler.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the delay-line phase repeats at odd multiples of the design frequency, a single fabricated device may serve multiple discrete bands, suggesting the periodic nulls could be exploited for multi-band SSB generation without redesign.
  • The same delay-line phase-shifting idea could be ported to other integrated photonic platforms such as silicon or silicon nitride as long as low-loss delay waveguides are available, making mono-drive SSB a generic building block rather than a TFLN-specific trick.
  • The reported suppression is limited by loss imbalance and splitter extinction; if those are improved, the achievable suppression may approach the intrinsic limit set by the electro-optic modulation itself, potentially exceeding 30 dB.
  • Using a voltage-trimmed phase shifter instead of the thermal trim could allow faster and more precise sideband selection while keeping the single-RF-input architecture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and experimentally demonstrates a single-RF-drive optical single-sideband (SSB) modulator on thin-film lithium niobate, in which on-chip optical delay lines replace the electrical 90° RF hybrid or dual synchronized RF sources of conventional SSB generators. The authors report full-carrier SSB (FC-SSB) with a maximum sideband suppression of 22.1 dB at 50 GHz, carrier-suppressed SSB (CS-SSB) with suppression numbers that are stated inconsistently (22.5 dB versus 16.9 dB), a demonstration of immunity to dispersion-induced power fading over 5 km fiber, and an RF frequency-shifting experiment that converts a 39–50 GHz signal down to 1–12 GHz by optical beating with an on-chip phase-modulator reference.

Significance. If the reported performance is correct, the scheme would offer a meaningful simplification for high-frequency SSB generation, avoiding the cost, loss, and frequency limitations of electrical 90° hybrids and dual-channel RF sources. The on-chip delay-line approach is scalable in principle, and the integrated demonstration with a functional power-fading measurement and an RF frequency-shifting experiment is valuable. The work is potentially significant for microwave photonics, optical communications, and FMCW LiDAR/radar, but the central quantitative claim for CS-SSB is currently internally inconsistent, and the core theoretical derivation is deferred to a supplement that is not available for review.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Conclusion, and Results (Fig. 4(f))] The CS-SSB 50 GHz result is reported inconsistently. The Abstract states a maximum sideband suppression of 22.5 dB, and the Conclusion repeats this: 'a maximum sideband suppression of 22.1 dB and 22.5 dB are demonstrated for 50 GHz FC-SSB and CS-SSB devices'. However, the Results section, in the paragraph describing Fig. 4(f), says 'a sideband suppression of 16.9 dB and a sideband-to-carrier suppression of 22.5 dB are achieved'. These two statements cannot both describe the same spectrum unless the definition of sideband suppression and sideband-to-carrier suppression is swapped between the two locations. If the Results section is correct, the headline number in the Abstract and Conclusion is wrong by 5.6 dB, and the actual maximum sideband suppression for CS-SSB is 16.9 dB, which is only marginally better than the 16.6 dB at 25 GHz. This is a load-bearing inconsistency because the 50 GHz CS-SSB suppression is a primary quantitative result of the paper. The authors must provide the raw measured spectrum with clear peak labels, define both metrics precisely, and correct the Abstract and Conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Results, Working principle and device design; Supplement 1] The central derivation of the operating principle—including the condition that an optical delay line produces an effective 90° RF phase shift and the detailed analysis of sideband cancellation—is not present in the main text. The text repeatedly refers to 'Supplement 1' (e.g., 'see Supplement 1 for details' and 'see detailed theoretical analysis in Supplement 1'). Since the supplement is not included with the manuscript, the core analytic claim cannot be verified from the main text alone. The authors should either include the key equations and phase relationships in the main text or provide the supplement for review; this is essential for assessing the correctness of the proposed mechanism.
  3. [Figures 2(j) and 4(d)-(e)] The measured sideband suppression points are reported without error bars, repeated measurements, or any uncertainty quantification. For example, Fig. 2(j) shows measured dots with a claimed agreement to simulation, and Fig. 4(d) shows measured suppression versus frequency, but no confidence intervals are given. Since the paper's headline claims are specific dB numbers (22.1 dB, 22.5 dB, 16.9 dB), the lack of any measurement uncertainty makes it impossible to assess whether the differences between the 25 GHz and 50 GHz devices are statistically meaningful. At least two or three repeated measurements per condition should be reported.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The claim that the scheme 'saves energy consumption by 3 dB' should be more precise about the comparison baseline. A conventional dual-drive system with an RF hybrid splits the source power and incurs hybrid loss; but a dual-drive system with two separate synchronized sources would not, and the modulation efficiency comparison depends on how the total RF power is accounted. Clarify the energy-saving statement.
  2. [Fig. 2(h)-(i)] The simulated 3 dB suppression bandwidth is given as 25% of the target frequency, and the measured FC-SSB bandwidth is 6.75 GHz centered at 27 GHz (50 GHz device? Actually the text says 'centered at 27 GHz' for the 25 GHz design), which is consistent. However, the figure label and caption should specify which device each curve corresponds to and note that the 27 GHz peak is a fabrication-deviation shift from the intended 25 GHz.
  3. [Fig. 3(b) and general presentation] The EO S21 curves in Fig. 3(b) lack axis labels and units in the manuscript text; the figure should include frequency (GHz) on the x-axis and normalized S21 (dB) on the y-axis. The same applies to the spectra in Fig. 4, which should show optical frequency or wavelength detuning with the carrier at 0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the delay-line SSB principle is derived from interferometric phase relations, and the headline suppression numbers are direct OSA measurements rather than outputs of a fitted model.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a single RF drive can produce FC-SSB and CS-SSB if an on-chip optical delay line converts carrier/sideband phase relationships into an effective 90-degree RF phase shift. This working principle is analytic: the delay length is set from the target RF frequency and a simulated group index (FDE solver), not from the measured suppression ratios, and the sideband-cancellation condition is the standard destructive-interference condition of an MZI. The quantitative claims (22.1 dB FC-SSB at 50 GHz, 16.9/22.5 dB for CS-SSB at 50 GHz) are presented as measured OSA spectra, not as predictions of a model whose parameters were fit to those spectra. The only calibrated element is the simulated sideband-suppression curve in Fig. 2(j), whose stated upper limit is taken from the measured MZI extinction ratio; this is transparent and does not constitute the paper's central result. The self-citation [44] concerns the waveguide-crossing component used inside the CS-SSB device and is not load-bearing for the mono-drive principle. The abstract/conclusion reports 22.5 dB as CS-SSB sideband suppression while the Results text assigns 16.9 dB to sideband suppression and 22.5 dB to sideband-to-carrier suppression; this is an internal numerical inconsistency and a correctness matter, not a circularity. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained: the concept, the device design, and the measured demonstrations are independent of the claims they are used to support.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the 'photonic RF phase shifter' is a functional description of an optical delay line. The central design relies on standard EO modulation theory, a simulated group index, and interferometric recombination, with the main unstated burden being fabrication accuracy and splitter/loss balance.

free parameters (2)
  • MZI extinction-ratio calibration constant = not stated
    The simulated sideband suppression curve in Fig. 2(j) is capped by the measured extinction ratio of the MZI, so the prediction depends on a device-specific calibration rather than being fully ab initio.
  • Thermal phase shifter setpoints = not stated
    Quadrature bias points for FC-SSB and CS-SSB are tuned experimentally via DC and thermal phase shifters; the setpoints are not reported but do not enter the theoretical derivation.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math A time delay tau multiplies an optical spectral component at angular frequency omega by exp(-i omega tau).
    This is the mathematical basis for the photonic RF phase shifter; used in the working principle section.
  • domain assumption First-order sideband (small-signal) model of electro-optic modulation describes the sideband amplitudes and phases.
    Sideband amplitudes in the working principle are described with Bessel-function perturbation; valid for modulation powers around 10-15 dBm used in the measurements.
  • domain assumption Group index from FDE simulation accurately sets the optical delay.
    The delay length is designed from simulated group index; the measured center-frequency shift from 25 GHz to 27 GHz shows this assumption has limited accuracy.
  • domain assumption Ideal 50/50 splitting and coherent recombination in the MZI.
    Achievable sideband suppression is limited by splitter imbalance and delay-line loss imbalance, which the paper identifies as the main constraint.
  • domain assumption Thermal phase shifters provide pure phase control without amplitude change.
    Used to set quadrature and destructive-interference conditions; no calibration data for phase shifter response are provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mono-drive single-sideband modulation via optical delay lines on thin-film lithium niobate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BFKC5XXA

@misc{pith2026241117070,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mono-drive single-sideband modulation via optical delay lines on thin-film lithium niobate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BFKC5XXA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17070}
}
read the original abstract

Optical single-sideband (SSB) modulation features high spectral efficiency, substantial dispersion tolerance, and straightforward detection, making it a versatile technology for applications in optical communications, microwave photonics, optical sensing, satellite communication, etc. However, conventional SSB generators typically require two radio-frequency (RF) signals with a 90{\deg} phase difference to drive a pair of parallel phase or amplitude modulators, resulting in high system complexity and low power efficiency. In this paper, we propose and realize a simplified SSB generation scheme necessitating only a single RF drive, by achieving effective RF phase shift using on-chip optical delay lines. This approach not only reduces system complexity and saves energy consumption by 3 dB, but also enables easy scalability to higher frequencies. We demonstrate both full-carrier SSB (FC-SSB) and carrier-suppressed SSB (CS-SSB) modulation on thin-film lithium niobate platform. For FC-SSB, we show a maximum sideband suppression of 22.1 dB at 50 GHz and apply it to address the frequency-selective power fading problem in optical communication systems. For CS-SSB, we show a maximum sideband suppression of 22.5 dB and a sideband-to-carrier suppression of 16.9 dB at 50 GHz, which can act as an optical frequency shifter by sweeping the modulation frequencies. Moreover, the shifted optical frequency can be transferred back to the electrical domain by beating with a reference signal generated via a phase modulator on the same chip, achieving broadband RF frequency shifting from a maximum of 50 GHz down to 1 GHz. Our simple, power-efficient, and low-cost SSB modulation scheme could provide an effective solution for future high-frequency direct detection-based communication systems, frequency-modulated continuous wave radar/LiDAR, optical vector network analyzers, and microwave photonics systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Data center links beyond 100 Gbit/s per wavelength,

    J. Krause Perin, A. Shastri, and J. M. Kahn, "Data center links beyond 100 Gbit/s per wavelength," Optical Fiber Technology 44, 69–85 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Optical communications for short reach,

    M. Chagnon, “Optical communications for short reach,” J. Lightwave Technol. 37, 1779–1797 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    An ultrawide-bandwidth single-sideband modulator for terahertz frequencies,

    A. S. Meijer, G. Berden, D. D. Arslanov, et al., "An ultrawide-bandwidth single-sideband modulator for terahertz frequencies," Nature Photon 10(11), 740–744 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Optical single-sideband transmitters,

    T. Bo, H. Kim, Z. Tan, et al., “Optical single-sideband transmitters,” J. Lightwave Technol. 41, 1163–1174 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Experimental demonstration of secure 100 Gb/s IMDD transmission over a 50 km SSMF using a quantum noise stream cipher and optical coarse-to-fine modulation,

    Y. Wang, H. Li, M. Cheng, et al., "Experimental demonstration of secure 100 Gb/s IMDD transmission over a 50 km SSMF using a quantum noise stream cipher and optical coarse-to-fine modulation," Opt. Express 29(4), 5475 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    100 GBd IM/DD transmission over 14 km SMF in the C-band enabled by a plasmonic SSB MZM,

    B. Baeuerle, C. Hoessbacher, W. Heni, et al., "100 GBd IM/DD transmission over 14 km SMF in the C-band enabled by a plasmonic SSB MZM," Opt. Express 28(6), 8601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Kramers–Kronig coherent receiver,

    A. Mecozzi, C. Antonelli, and M. Shtaif, "Kramers–Kronig coherent receiver," Optica 3(11), 1220 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Analog low-latency Kramers-Kronig optical single-sideband receiver,

    A. J. Lowery and T. Feleppa, “Analog low-latency Kramers-Kronig optical single-sideband receiver,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39, 3130–3136 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Ultrahigh-resolution optical vector analysis based on optical single-sideband modulation,

    S. Pan and M. Xue, “Ultrahigh-resolution optical vector analysis based on optical single-sideband modulation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 836–845 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    In-situ optical vector analysis based on integrated lithium niobate single-sideband modulators,

    H. Feng, T. Ge, Y. Hu, et al., "In-situ optical vector analysis based on integrated lithium niobate single-sideband modulators," (n.d.)

  3. [11]

    A compact cold-atom interferometer with a high data-rate grating magneto-optical trap and a photonic-integrated-circuit-compatible laser system,

    J. Lee, R. Ding, J. Christensen, et al., "A compact cold-atom interferometer with a high data-rate grating magneto-optical trap and a photonic-integrated-circuit-compatible laser system," Nat Commun 13(1), 5131 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    High-performance silicon photonic single-sideband modulators for cold-atom interferometry,

    A. Kodigala, M. Gehl, G. W. Hoth, et al., "High-performance silicon photonic single-sideband modulators for cold-atom interferometry," Sci. Adv. 10(28), eade4454 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Carrier-suppressed single sideband signal for FMCW LiDAR using a Si photonic-crystal optical modulators,

    M. Kamata, Y. Hinakura, and T. Baba, “Carrier-suppressed single sideband signal for FMCW LiDAR using a Si photonic-crystal optical modulators,” J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 2315–2321 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Optical FMCW signal generation using a silicon dual-parallel Mach- Zehnder modulator,

    P. Shi, L. Lu, C. Liu, et al., “Optical FMCW signal generation using a silicon dual-parallel Mach- Zehnder modulator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 33, 301–304 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Photonics-assisted frequency up/down conversion with tunable OEO and phase shift,

    F. Yang, D. Wang, Y. Wang, et al, “Photonics-assisted frequency up/down conversion with tunable OEO and phase shift,” J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 6446–6457 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Photonics‐based microwave frequency mixing: methodology and applications,

    Z. Tang, Y. Li, J. Yao, et al., “Photonics‐based microwave frequency mixing: methodology and applications,” Laser & Photonics Reviews 14, 1800350 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Precise tuning of single-photon frequency using an optical single sideband modulator,

    H.-P. Lo and H. Takesue, "Precise tuning of single-photon frequency using an optical single sideband modulator," Optica 4(8), 919 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Single-photon frequency shifting with a quadrature phase-shift keying modulator,

    C. Chen, J. E. Heyes, J. H. Shapiro, et al., "Single-photon frequency shifting with a quadrature phase-shift keying modulator," Sci Rep 11(1), 300 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    High rate CV-QKD secured mobile WDM fronthaul for dense 5G radio networks,

    D. Milovancev, N. Vokic, F. Laudenbach, et al., “High rate CV-QKD secured mobile WDM fronthaul for dense 5G radio networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 39, 3445–3457 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Pilot-assisted intradyne reception for high-speed continuous-variable quantum key distribution with true local oscillator,

    F. Laudenbach, B. Schrenk, C. Pacher, et al., "Pilot-assisted intradyne reception for high-speed continuous-variable quantum key distribution with true local oscillator," Quantum 3, 193 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Gigahertz acousto-optic modulation and frequency shifting on etchless lithium niobate integrated platform,

    Z. Yu and X. Sun, “Gigahertz acousto-optic modulation and frequency shifting on etchless lithium niobate integrated platform,” ACS Photonics 8, 798–803 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics,

    E. A. Kittlaus, W. M. Jones, P. T. Rakich, et al., "Electrically driven acousto-optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics," Nat. Photonics 15(1), 43–52 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Integrated microwave acousto-optic frequency shifter on thin-film lithium niobate,

    L. Shao, N. Sinclair, J. Leatham, et al., "Integrated microwave acousto-optic frequency shifter on thin-film lithium niobate," Opt. Express 28(16), 23728 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Digital chromatic dispersion pre-management for SSB modulation direct-detection optical transmission systems,

    X. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Chen, et al., "Digital chromatic dispersion pre-management for SSB modulation direct-detection optical transmission systems," Optics Communications 427, 551–556 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    QAM modulation with single DDMZM based on direct-detection and Kramers-Kronig scheme in long reach PON,

    X. Gao, B. Xu, Y. Cai, et al., "QAM modulation with single DDMZM based on direct-detection and Kramers-Kronig scheme in long reach PON," Optical Fiber Technology 48, 289–296 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Performance comparison of optical single-sideband modulation in RoF link,

    Y. Cai, X. Gao, Y. Ling, et al., "Performance comparison of optical single-sideband modulation in RoF link," Optics Communications 463, 125409 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Design and performance of the bidirectional optical single-sideband modulator,

    A. Loayssa, C. Lim, A. Nirmalathas, et al., "Design and performance of the bidirectional optical single-sideband modulator," J. Lightwave Technol. 21(4), 1071–1082 (2003)

    2003

  20. [28]

    Analysis of the carrier suppressed single sideband modulation for long distance optical communication systems,

    F. Paloi and S. Haxha, "Analysis of the carrier suppressed single sideband modulation for long distance optical communication systems," Optik 161, 230–243 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Optical single-sideband transmitter for various electrical signaling formats,

    D. Fonseca, A. V. T. Cartaxo, and P. Monteiro, "Optical single-sideband transmitter for various electrical signaling formats," J. Lightwave Technol. 24(5), 2059–2069 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Optical single-sideband modulation with tunable optical carrier to sideband ratio in radio Over fiber systems,

    B. Hraimel, X. Zhang, Y. Pei, et al., “Optical single-sideband modulation with tunable optical carrier to sideband ratio in radio Over fiber systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29, 775–781 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Linear single-sideband modulation for high-SNR wavelength conversion,

    T. Kawanishi and M. Izutsu, “Linear single-sideband modulation for high-SNR wavelength conversion,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16, 1534–1536 (2004)

    2004

  24. [32]

    X-cut lithium niobate optical single-sideband modulator,

    K. Higuma, S. Oikawa, Y. Hashimoto, et al., "X-cut lithium niobate optical single-sideband modulator," Electron. Lett. 37(8), 515 (2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    Optical carrier-suppressed single sideband modulation based on a thin-film lithium niobate IQ modulator for FMCW ranging application,

    X. Lei, G. Wang, H. Tan, et al., "Optical carrier-suppressed single sideband modulation based on a thin-film lithium niobate IQ modulator for FMCW ranging application," J. Lightwave Technol. 1– 7 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Aluminium nitride integrated photonics: a review,

    N. Li, C. P. Ho, S. Zhu, et al., "Aluminium nitride integrated photonics: a review," Nanophotonics 10(9), 2347–2387 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Hybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum photonics,

    J.-H. Kim, S. Aghaeimeibodi, J. Carolan, et al., "Hybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum photonics," Optica 7(4), 291 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    The 2019 surface acoustic waves roadmap,

    P. Delsing, A. N. Cleland, M. J. A. Schuetz, et al., "The 2019 surface acoustic waves roadmap," J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52(35), 353001 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber- optic communications systems,

    E. L. Wooten, K. M. Kissa, A. Yi-Yan, et al., "A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber- optic communications systems," IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 6(1), 69–82 (2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, et al., "Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages," Nature 562(7725), 101–104 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Integrated lithium niobate microwave photonic processing engine,

    H. Feng, T. Ge, X. Guo, et al., "Integrated lithium niobate microwave photonic processing engine," Nature 627(8002), 80–87 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Thin‐film lithium niobate optical modulators with an extrapolated bandwidth of 170 GHz,

    F. Arab Juneghani, M. Gholipour Vazimali, J. Zhao, et al, “Thin‐film lithium niobate optical modulators with an extrapolated bandwidth of 170 GHz,” Advanced Photonics Research 4, 2200216 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    100 GHz bandwidth, 1 volt integrated electro-optic Mach–Zehnder modulator at near-IR wavelengths,

    F. Valdez, V. Mere, and S. Mookherjea, "100 GHz bandwidth, 1 volt integrated electro-optic Mach–Zehnder modulator at near-IR wavelengths," Optica 10(5), 578 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Orthogonally polarized RF optical single sideband generation with integrated ring resonators,

    M. Tan, X. Xu, J. Wu, et al., "Orthogonally polarized RF optical single sideband generation with integrated ring resonators," J. Semicond. 42(4), 041305 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Performance analysis of an optical single sideband modulation approach with tunable optical carrier-to-sideband ratio,

    J. Li, T. Ning, L. Pei, et al., "Performance analysis of an optical single sideband modulation approach with tunable optical carrier-to-sideband ratio," Optics & Laser Technology 48, 210–215 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Design and resonator-assisted characterization of high- performance lithium niobate waveguide crossings,

    Y. Chen, K. Zhang, H. Feng, et al., "Design and resonator-assisted characterization of high- performance lithium niobate waveguide crossings," Opt. Lett. 48(9), 2218 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    A review of hybrid couplers: State‐of‐the‐ art, applications, design issues and challenges,

    A. A. Abdulbari, S. K. Abdul Rahim, P. J. Soh, et al., “A review of hybrid couplers: State‐of‐the‐ art, applications, design issues and challenges,” Int J Numerical Modelling 34, e2919 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.