Critical local well-posedness of the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on the torus

Beomjong Kwak; Soonsik Kwon

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 23 references

Critical local well-posedness of the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on the torus

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves local well-posedness of the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation on tori for every power $a > 4/d$, a range that includes previously open energy-critical cases in dimensions $d \ge 5$.

desk verdict Strong ideas and genuinely new results, but Lemma 3.10's summation step leaves the central bilinear estimate unjustified. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17147 v1 pith:32CJA6SN submitted 2024-11-26 math.AP

Beomjong Kwak , Soonsik Kwon This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q5535A0135B65

keywords nonlinearSchrödingerequationcriticalregularitytoruslocalwell-posednessnon-algebraicnonlinearitybilinearStrichartzestimateZ^sfunctionspaceHölderill-posedness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes local well-posedness for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation $i u_t + \Delta u = \pm |u|^a u$ on the torus $\mathbb{T}^d$ at its critical Sobolev regularity, for every $a > 4/d$ with $s < 1 + a$, where $s = d/2 - 2/a$. Previously, non-algebraic nonlinearities (where $a$ is not an even integer, in particular small $a < 2$) were only treatable by contraction methods requiring $a \ge 2$; the paper removes that barrier. The advance rests on a new bilinear Strichartz estimate with a positive frequency-decay factor and a newly designed function space $Z^s$ whose norms shrink on short time intervals, allowing large-data bootstrap arguments. As corollaries, the energy-critical cases in dimensions $d \ge 5$ fall into the well-posed range, the flow is Lipschitz for $a > \max\{4/d, 1\}$ with $s < a$, and for $0 < a < 1$ the solution map fails to be $\alpha$-Hölder for every $\alpha > a$.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is a bilinear estimate, Lemma 3.9 (inequality (3.25)), controlling products of high-frequency and low-frequency pieces of solutions: for $N \ge 32 R$, the spacetime pairing of $\psi^2 u_N \overline{v} A_R$ is bounded by $\|u\|_{Z^0}\|v\|_{Z^0}(\langle N/R\rangle^{-\sigma_1} + R^{-2\sigma_1}) R^{\theta} \|A_R\|_{B^{1/r_0 - 1/q_0}_{r_0,r_0} L^{r_0}}$ with $\sigma_1 > 0$. The positive decay factor in $N/R$ is what makes the frequency summation converge when the nonlinearity has small power $a < 2$. To carry this estimate, the paper introduces a function space $Z^s$ on $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{T}^d$ whose norm measures, after localizing in time and in dyadic spatial frequency $N$, the $L^q L^r$ size and a time-Besov size of Galilean-shifted frequency cubes; unlike atomic spaces $U^p, V^p$, the $Z^s$ norm of a free evolution restricted to a short interval tends to zero as the interval shrinks (property (3.13)), which is what makes large-data bootstrap bounds possible. Together with the Bony linearization (4.1), which decomposes the nonlinearity into $u_N$ times a derivative factor, the bilinear estimate yields the nonlinear estimates (4.8) and (4.9).

What would settle it

Take $u = e^{it\Delta}\delta_N$, $v = e^{it\Delta}\delta_R$, and $A_R = \chi_{[0,1]}\delta_R$ in dimension $d = 5$ with $N/R$ ranging over powers of two. If the optimal constant in inequality (3.25) decays only like $(\log(N/R))^{-C}$ instead of a positive power of $N/R$, then the frequency summation in Corollary 4.3 would diverge and the theorem's stated exponent range could not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Cauchy problem for $|u|^a u$ on $\mathbb{T}^d$ is locally well-posed in $H^s(\mathbb{T}^d)$ at the scaling-critical regularity $s = d/2 - 2/a$ whenever $a > 4/d$ and $s < 1 + a$. This range includes all mass-supercritical exponents and, for $d \ge 5$, the energy-critical case $s = 1$, which was previously unresolved on pure tori. The proof does not rely on a contraction mapping when $a$ is small, because the paper simultaneously proves that the solution map is not Lipschitz there; instead it constructs a priori bounds in a new space $Z^s$, extracts a weak limit, establishes uniqueness by a difference estimate in lower regularity, and proves continuous dependence via a weighted high-frequency decay estimate. The same package yields Lipschitz well-posedness for $a > \max\{4/d, 1\}$, $s < a$, and a Hölder-ill-posedness theorem showing the failure of $\alpha$-Hölder continuity for $0 < a < 1$ and $\alpha > a$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof's load-bearing premise is that when a high-frequency wave interacts with a low-frequency one, the interaction shrinks by a positive power of the frequency ratio; without that shrinkage, the sums over frequencies in the proof would diverge logarithmically and the construction of solutions would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every dimension $d \ge 5$, the energy-critical case $s = 1$ now lies in the local well-posedness range, which was previously open on pure tori.
The proof uses no number-theoretic property of $\mathbb{Z}^d$, so the same argument works on irrational tori $\mathbb{R}^d/(\theta_1 \mathbb{Z} \times \cdots \times \theta_d \mathbb{Z})$.
The solution map is locally Lipschitz for $a > \max\{4/d, 1\}$ with $s < a$, and this is nearly sharp: for $0 < a < 1$, no $\alpha$-Hölder modulus with $\alpha > a$ is possible.
In dimensions $d \le 7$, the condition $s < 1 + a$ is automatic, so Theorem 1.1 covers every mass-supercritical power $a > 4/d$.
The new $Z^s$ space provides an alternative to atomic $U^p, V^p$ spaces for critical dispersive problems, with the key property that time localization shrinks the norm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper's claims, the same bilinear-decay mechanism could apply to other periodic dispersive equations whose Strichartz estimates lose derivatives, such as higher-order Schrödinger or wave equations on tori.
A natural testable extension is to replace the single power $|u|^a u$ by a nonlinearity with several powers; the $Z^s$ machinery suggests the smallest power controls well-posedness and the regularity of the solution map.
The boundary $a = 1$ is a plausible next target: the paper leaves Lipschitz continuity inconclusive in dimension $6$ at $a = 1$, and the Hölder exponent $\alpha > a$ suggests interpolation might determine the optimal modulus exactly there.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my honest read. The paper has a genuinely new idea: a Z^s space and a bilinear Strichartz estimate with a decay factor that could push the local well-posedness range from Lee's a>=2 down to a>4/d. The main theorems are new, the proofs are detailed, and the negative Holder result in Theorem 1.3 looks like a nice complement. I found no issues with the early machinery (Lemmas 3.2, 3.3, etc.). But there is a real gap in Lemma 3.10, and it is load-bearing.

The problem is in the summation step right after (3.28). The inequality (3.25) comes with a factor R^theta on the A_R term. When the authors sum over R, they replace the sum over R of R^theta ||A_R||_{B^{1/r-1/q}_{r,r}L^r} by the single Besov norm ||A||_{B^{1/r-1/q}_{r,r} B^theta_{r,infty}}, which does not control the R^theta factor. A concrete example: take A_R(t,x)=a_R(x)h(t) with a_R at spatial frequency R and h(t) at time frequency 1. Then the norm on the right is R^{1/r-1/q}||a_R||||h|| while the left sum has an additional R^theta. The proof gives no time-frequency localization of A that would absorb this. Since Lemma 3.10 feeds directly into Proposition 3.11 and the nonlinear estimates (4.8)-(4.9), the central well-posedness claim is not fully supported as written.

Is this repairable? Possibly. The A that actually appears in the application comes from the nonlinearity via Bony linearization, and those A's may carry extra structure (e.g., time frequencies tied to spatial frequencies). But the lemma is stated for arbitrary A, and the proof does not use such structure. So the gap is real as written.

My advice: send it to a serious referee, and instruct the referee to focus on Lemma 3.10. The paper deserves referee time because the idea is important and the rest of the architecture may well be correct. But I would not cite it until the gap is fixed.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves local well-posedness for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation |u|^a u on T^d at the scaling-critical regularity s=d/2-2/a under the assumptions a>4/d and s<1+a (Theorem 1.1), together with a Lipschitz well-posedness result for a larger range of a (Theorem 1.2) and a sharp failure of H\"older continuity of the solution map for small a (Theorem 1.3). The method introduces a new function space Z^s, a bilinear Strichartz estimate (Lemma 3.9), and a package of Besov-space embeddings, which are then combined with Bony linearizations and a weak-limit construction. I checked the summation step in Lemma 3.10 that was flagged as questionable: the R^\theta factor is part of the spatial Besov norm B^\theta_{r_0,\infty}, and the dyadic sum in R converges because the kernel (\langle N/R\rangle^{-\sigma_1}+R^{-2\sigma_1}) is summable in R for each fixed N. Thus the specific objection about a missing time-frequency assumption on A does not land. My remaining concerns are about technical points in the function-space framework rather than about the main bilinear summation.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.1 is a substantial advance: it treats non-algebraic nonlinearities with small a and includes new energy-critical cases in d\ge5, a regime where previous atomic-space methods required algebraic nonlinearities or a\ge2. The construction of Z^s, which is not based on conventional atomic spaces and shrinks on short time intervals, is an interesting contribution in its own right. The negative result Theorem 1.3 also gives a useful almost-sharp limitation on the regularity of the solution map. The paper is detailed and many of the intermediate estimates are proven step by step, including the new bilinear estimate and the embedding properties of Z^s. The manuscript would benefit from a careful revision addressing the Besov-space technicalities and the definitional identity Z^s=\ell^2_s Z^0.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.3, Lemma 3.9 and Proposition 3.11] The proof uses Besov spaces B^{1/r_0-1/q_0}_{r_0,r_0} and B^\theta_{r_0,\infty} with r_0=(2+\sigma_3+\sigma_2)/(d+2), which is smaller than 1 for d\ge2. However, the interpolation and product rules stated in Section 2, in particular Proposition 2.2 and Corollary 2.4 (2.13), are formulated only for p,q\in[1,\infty]. The step (3.31) explicitly invokes (2.13) with a target Besov exponent r_0<1, which is outside the stated hypotheses. Since (3.31) is the bridge from the bilinear estimate (3.26) to the nonlinear estimate (3.29) used in Proposition 3.11 and hence in the proof of Theorem 1.1, this is a load-bearing technical point. Please provide a proof or a precise reference for the quasi-Banach Besov product and interpolation rules needed here, or adjust the exponents so that r_0\ge1.
[Section 3.2, Definition 3.4 and Eq. (3.11)] The identity Z^s=\ell^2_s Z^0 is asserted in (3.11) and used to justify the retarded estimate K^+: (Z^{-s})'\to Z^s and the bootstrap in (4.14), but it is not immediate from Definition 3.4. In the definition, the maxima over q and \alpha sit outside the \ell^2_s sums, the first term is weighted by s-\sigma, while Z^0 already contains an \ell^2 summation in N with weight -\sigma. As written, Definition 3.4 and the standard meaning of \ell^2_s Z^0 are not visibly equivalent. Please clarify the convention: either define Z^s as \ell^2_s Z^0 and prove equivalence with (3.10), or prove directly that the two norms are comparable. This is needed because the linear estimates and duality arguments in Section 4 rely on (3.11).
[Section 3.3, Lemma 3.8] The interpolation step from (3.21) and (3.22) to (3.23) is described in a single sentence and does not specify the interpolation functor or the precise way in which the three parameters (1/q,1/r,\rho) run over the open tetrahedron. Since the endpoints have different q and r, and since one of the spaces may be quasi-Banach when r<1, this interpolation deserves a full proof or a precise reference. This is particularly important because Lemma 3.8 feeds directly into Lemma 3.9, the key bilinear estimate.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.3, after Eq. (3.28)] In the passage from (3.28) to the following display, the authors replace R^\theta\|A_R\|_{B^{s}_{r,r}L^r} by \|A\|_{B^{s}_{r,r}B^\theta_{r,\infty}} without comment. I verified this is valid, since R^\theta\|P_R A\|_{L^r} is controlled by the B^\theta_{r,\infty} norm and the dyadic sum in R converges by the decay factors in (3.25). Nevertheless, adding the one-line justification would remove the appearance that the R^\theta factor is dropped.
[Section 2.1] The notation B^s_{p,q}E is introduced for q\in[1,\infty], but Lemma 3.9 and Proposition 3.11 use exponents r_0<1. Please state explicitly that quasi-Banach Besov spaces are allowed in those instances, or modify the notational convention in Section 2.
[Abstract] There is a typo in the abstract: "equa tion" should be "equation".
[Remark 1.5] The displayed uncovered band in Remark 1.5 is missing the word "and" between the two alternatives; it should read "a < ... or a > ...".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proof derives new bilinear estimates from external Strichartz/Besov tools and does not fit parameters or import load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 1.1) rests on a new bilinear estimate (Lemma 3.9, Eq. (3.25)) and a new function space Z^s. I checked the derivation chain: Z^s is defined in Def. 3.4 using explicit weights and Besov norms; the proof of (3.25) uses the Galilean identity (3.20), Besov interpolation (Lemma 3.8), and the Z^0 norm via Lemma 3.6. The bilinear estimate is then used to prove Lemma 3.10, Proposition 3.11, and the nonlinear estimates (4.7)-(4.9). None of these steps assumes the conclusion of Theorem 1.1. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction: all exponents (σ, σ_j, q_0, r_0, θ) are explicit and fixed, not calibrated to data. The bibliography contains no self-citations by Kwak/Kwon; the cited results [6,7,10,15,18] are external prior work. The apparent summation issue after (3.28) in Lemma 3.10 is a technical-estimate question, not a circularity: the R^θ factor is controlled by the spatial Besov norm B^θ_{r,∞} appearing in the A-norm, and the proof does not reduce to its own output. The construction of Z^s as 'adapted to' the bilinear estimate is a deliberate norm design, which is normal in harmonic analysis and not circular. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim depends on standard tools (Strichartz estimates, atomic spaces, Besov embeddings, fractional calculus) imported from the literature, plus a new hierarchy of small parameters used to define Zs. No new physical entities are postulated; the main novel object is the function space Zs, which is constructed rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (6)

sigma
Ad hoc small parameter defined in (3.1), chosen so that sigma is much smaller than 1/p and s. The final results are independent of its exact value.
sigma1
Small parameter in the hierarchy (3.24), used to define the decay factor in the bilinear estimate (3.25).
sigma2
Small parameter in the hierarchy (3.24), used to set the exponents q0, r0, theta in Lemma 3.9.
sigma3
Small parameter in the hierarchy (3.24), used to define the exponents in Lemma 3.9 and Proposition 3.11.
sigma4
Small parameter in the hierarchy (3.24), used in the proof of Proposition 3.11.
epsilon1
Small parameter fixed in Lemma 4.4, chosen much smaller than epsilon0 to allow the weighted nonlinear estimate (4.8).

assumptions (6)

standard math Scale-invariant Strichartz estimates on tori (Proposition 2.12) hold for p in (2(d+2)/d, infinity).
Imported from [6,7,15]; used throughout Section 3 and in the weak-limit construction in Section 4.
standard math Embedding properties of atomic spaces U^p, V^p, Y^s (Propositions 2.14 and 2.15) hold, including the dual estimate (2.27).
From [10]; used to relate Ys and Zs and to transfer Strichartz estimates.
standard math Vector-valued Besov embeddings, interpolation identities, and product rules (Propositions 2.1-2.3 and Corollary 2.4) hold.
From [1,2,19]; used heavily in Section 3, especially in Lemmas 3.7-3.10 and Proposition 3.11.
standard math Fractional chain rule and fractional Holder inequalities (Lemmas 2.5-2.8) are valid for the nonlinearity F(z) = |z|^a z.
Built on results from [21]; needed to handle the non-algebraic nonlinearity in Sections 3 and 4.
standard math Bony linearization formula (4.1) applies to the non-algebraic nonlinearity N(u) = |u|^a u.
Standard paraproduct identity from [18], valid because N is absolutely continuous in u for a > 0.
domain assumption The domain is the square torus T^d; the proof is written there and the authors note it adapts to irrational tori.
Remark 1.4 restricts the main proof to T^d; the irrational case is not written out in detail.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical local well-posedness of the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on the torus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32CJA6SN

@misc{pith2026241117147,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical local well-posedness of the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation on the torus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32CJA6SN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17147}
}

abstract

In this paper, we study the local well-posedness of nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations on tori $\mathbb{T}^{d}$ at the critical regularity. We focus on cases where the nonlinearity $|u|^{a}u$ is non-algebraic with small $a>0$. We prove the local well-posedness for a wide range covering the mass-supercritical regime. Moreover, we supplementarily investigate the regularity of the solution map. In pursuit of lowering $a$, we prove a bilinear estimate for the Schr\"odinger operator on tori $\mathbb{T}^{d}$, which enhances previously known multilinear estimates. We design a function space adapted to the new bilinear estimate and a package of Strichartz estimates, which is not based on conventional atomic spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[1]

Operator-valued Fourier multipliers, v ector-valued Besov spaces, and appli- cations

Herbert Amann. Operator-valued Fourier multipliers, v ector-valued Besov spaces, and appli- cations. Math. Nachr. , 186:5–56, 1997

work page 1997
[2]

Compact embeddings of vector-valued Sob olev and Besov spaces

Herbert Amann. Compact embeddings of vector-valued Sob olev and Besov spaces. Glas. Mat. Ser. III , 35(55)(1):161–177, 2000. Dedicated to the memory of Brank o Najman

work page 2000
[3]

Large data local soluti ons for the derivative NLS equation

Ioan Bejenaru and Daniel Tataru. Large data local soluti ons for the derivative NLS equation. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 10(4):957–985, 2008

work page 2008
[4]

Interpolation spaces: an introduction , volume 223

Joran Bergh and Jorgen Lofstrom. Interpolation spaces: an introduction , volume 223. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

work page 2012
[5]

Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularités pour les équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires

Jean-Michel Bony. Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularités pour les équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) , 14(2):209–246, 1981

work page 1981
[6]

Bourgain

J. Bourgain. Fourier transform restriction phenomena f or certain lattice subsets and ap- plications to nonlinear evolution equations. I. Schröding er equations. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 3(2):107–156, 1993

1993
[7]

The proof of the l2 decoupling conjecture

Jean Bourgain and Ciprian Demeter. The proof of the l2 decoupling conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) , 182(1):351–389, 2015

2015
[8]

Strichartz esti mates for Schrödinger equations on irrational tori

Zihua Guo, Tadahiro Oh, and Yuzhao W ang. Strichartz esti mates for Schrödinger equations on irrational tori. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 109(4):975–1013, 2014

work page 2014

Show all 23 references

[9]

W ell-po sedness and scattering for the KP- II equation in a critical space

Martin Hadac, Sebastian Herr, and Herbert Koch. W ell-po sedness and scattering for the KP- II equation in a critical space. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire , 26(3):917–941, 2009

2009
[10]

G lobal well-posedness of the energy- critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation with small initia l data in H 1(T3)

Sebastian Herr, Daniel Tataru, and Nikolay Tzvetkov. G lobal well-posedness of the energy- critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation with small initia l data in H 1(T3). Duke Math. J. , 159(2):329–349, 2011

2011
[11]

S trichartz estimates for partially pe- riodic solutions to Schrödinger equations in 4d and applications

Sebastian Herr, Daniel Tataru, and Nikolay Tzvetkov. S trichartz estimates for partially pe- riodic solutions to Schrödinger equations in 4d and applications. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 690:65–78, 2014

2014
[12]

Ionescu and Benoit Pausader

Alexandru D. Ionescu and Benoit Pausader. The energy-c ritical defocusing NLS on T3. Duke Math. J. , 161(8):1581–1612, 2012

2012
[13]

Ionescu and Benoit Pausader

Alexandru D. Ionescu and Benoit Pausader. Global well- posedness of the energy-critical de- focusing NLS on R × T3. Comm. Math. Phys. , 312(3):781–831, 2012

2012
[14]

Endpoint Strichartz estim ates

Markus Keel and Terence Tao. Endpoint Strichartz estim ates. Amer. J. Math. , 120(5):955– 980, 1998

1998
[15]

Scale invariant Stricha rtz estimates on tori and applications

Rowan Killip and Monica Vişan. Scale invariant Stricha rtz estimates on tori and applications. Math. Res. Lett. , 23(2):445–472, 2016

2016
[16]

A priori bounds for the 1 D cubic NLS in negative Sobolev spaces

Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. A priori bounds for the 1 D cubic NLS in negative Sobolev spaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (16):Art. ID rnm053, 36, 2007. CRITICAL L WP OF NLS ON Td 41

2007
[17]

Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves, volume 45 of Oberwolfach Seminars

Herbert Koch, Daniel Tataru, and Monica Vişan. Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves, volume 45 of Oberwolfach Seminars . Birkhäuser/Springer, Basel, 2014. Generalized Korteweg-de Vries, nonlinear Schrödinger, wave and Schröd inger maps

2014
[18]

Local wellposedness for the critical nonli near Schrödinger equation on T3

Gyu Eun Lee. Local wellposedness for the critical nonli near Schrödinger equation on T3. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 39(5):2763–2783, 2019

2019
[19]

Modiﬁed Strichartz e stimates with an application to the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Makoto Nakamura and Takeshi W ada. Modiﬁed Strichartz e stimates with an application to the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinear Anal. , 130:138–156, 2016

2016
[20]

Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger equ ations on irrational tori in two and three dimensions

Nils Strunk. Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger equ ations on irrational tori in two and three dimensions. J. Evol. Equ. , 14(4-5):829–839, 2014

2014
[21]

The defocusing energy-critical nonline ar Schrödinger equation in higher di- mensions

Monica Visan. The defocusing energy-critical nonline ar Schrödinger equation in higher di- mensions. Duke Math. J. , 138(2):281–374, 2007

2007
[22]

Periodic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in critical H s(Tn) spaces

Yuzhao W ang. Periodic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in critical H s(Tn) spaces. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 45(3):1691–1703, 2013

2013
[23]

Global well-posedness for the energy-cri tical focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation on T4

Haitian Yue. Global well-posedness for the energy-cri tical focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation on T4. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 280:754–804, 2021. Email address : beomjong@kaist.ac.kr Department of Mathematical Sciences, Korea Adv anced Insti tute of Science and Technolo...

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Operator-valued Fourier multipliers, v ector-valued Besov spaces, and appli- cations

Herbert Amann. Operator-valued Fourier multipliers, v ector-valued Besov spaces, and appli- cations. Math. Nachr. , 186:5–56, 1997

work page 1997

[2] [2]

Compact embeddings of vector-valued Sob olev and Besov spaces

Herbert Amann. Compact embeddings of vector-valued Sob olev and Besov spaces. Glas. Mat. Ser. III , 35(55)(1):161–177, 2000. Dedicated to the memory of Brank o Najman

work page 2000

[3] [3]

Large data local soluti ons for the derivative NLS equation

Ioan Bejenaru and Daniel Tataru. Large data local soluti ons for the derivative NLS equation. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 10(4):957–985, 2008

work page 2008

[4] [4]

Interpolation spaces: an introduction , volume 223

Joran Bergh and Jorgen Lofstrom. Interpolation spaces: an introduction , volume 223. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

work page 2012

[5] [5]

Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularités pour les équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires

Jean-Michel Bony. Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularités pour les équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) , 14(2):209–246, 1981

work page 1981

[6] [6]

Bourgain

J. Bourgain. Fourier transform restriction phenomena f or certain lattice subsets and ap- plications to nonlinear evolution equations. I. Schröding er equations. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 3(2):107–156, 1993

1993

[7] [7]

The proof of the l2 decoupling conjecture

Jean Bourgain and Ciprian Demeter. The proof of the l2 decoupling conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) , 182(1):351–389, 2015

2015

[8] [8]

Strichartz esti mates for Schrödinger equations on irrational tori

Zihua Guo, Tadahiro Oh, and Yuzhao W ang. Strichartz esti mates for Schrödinger equations on irrational tori. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 109(4):975–1013, 2014

work page 2014