Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Kramers-Wannier duality lets the entropic c-function of (2+1)-dimensional Z2 gauge theory be computed from dual Ising simulations, yielding a power-law to exponential crossover at the mass-gap scale.

desk verdict Solid numerics, but the 'first numerical confirmation' claim fails against the paper's own fit, which finds alpha=0.36 rather than the predicted alpha=1. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17231 v1 pith:4LCWI5NS submitted 2024-11-26 hep-lat

Andrea Bulgarelli , Marco Panero This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lat
keywords entanglemententropylatticegaugetheoryKramers-Wannierdualityentropicc-functionRényiconfinementMonteCarlosimulationIsingmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the entanglement structure of a lattice gauge theory can be read off from its dual spin model. The authors exploit Kramers-Wannier duality to compute the entropic c-function of the (2+1)-dimensional Z2 gauge theory in the continuum limit, by simulating the dual Ising model. They report that the resulting c-function follows a power law at short distances and crosses over to an exponential decay when the slab thickness is comparable to the inverse mass gap, matching the behavior predicted by holographic models. If correct, this provides the first numerical confirmation of that prediction in a non-holographic confining theory, and establishes a general strategy for entanglement calculations in Abelian gauge theories.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on Kramers-Wannier duality, which maps the partition function of the 3D Ising model to that of the Z2 lattice gauge theory, and on the companion result [21] that this duality preserves the entropic c-function, $C_n^{\text{Ising}} = C_n^{\text{gauge}}$. The entropic c-function is defined as $C_n = \frac{l^{D-1}}{|\partial A|} \frac{\partial S_n}{\partial l}$, where $S_n$ is the R\'enyi entropy of a slab subsystem of thickness $l$, and the ratio of partition functions entering it is computed with a Jarzynski-based non-equilibrium Monte Carlo algorithm for two replicas. Thermodynamic and continuum limits are taken using scale setting from [42], mass gap from [45], and the conformal value $C_2^{\text{CFT}}$ from [44] for normalization.

What would settle it

A direct lattice calculation of the R\'enyi entropy ratio in the Z2 gauge theory, using an alternative replica construction (e.g., electric- or magnetic-center subalgebra), could be compared with the Ising-side result; a mismatch would signal that duality does not preserve the c-function. Additionally, computing $C_3$ from a three-replica simulation of the Ising model and comparing it with a direct gauge-theory computation would test the equality (11) beyond the second R\'enyi entropy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the entropic c-function of the (2+1)-dimensional Z2 gauge theory, extracted through duality from Monte Carlo simulations of the 3D Ising model, is described by a power law $C_2 \sim B/(l m_g)^c$ at short distances and by the exponential decay form (12) at large distances, with a crossover at $l m_g = 1$. After thermodynamic and continuum extrapolations, the fits give $B = 0.360(9)$, $c = 0.48(2)$, and $A = 0.33(3)$, $\alpha = 0.360(19)$, with reduced chi-squares near unity. The authors state that this is the first numerical confirmation of the Klebanov-Kutasov-Murugan prediction in a (2+1)-dimensional, non-holographic theory, and that the crossover scale is set by the mass gap of the theory.

Load-bearing premise

The entire numerical route depends on the equality $C_n^{\text{Ising}} = C_n^{\text{gauge}}$ (Eq. 11) holding for the replicated slab geometry in the continuum limit; if Kramers-Wannier duality does not preserve the entropic c-function, the reported curve is not the gauge theory c-function.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A universal strategy emerges for entanglement in Abelian gauge theories that admit a spin-model dual: simulate the dual model and map the result back to the gauge theory.
  • The results confirm that the holographic prediction of exponential decay of the entropic c-function holds beyond holography, in a genuinely non-holographic theory.
  • The crossover scale $l m_g = 1$ shows that the mass gap, rather than the number of colors, controls the transition from a short-distance power law to a long-distance exponential behavior.
  • The continuum-extrapolated c-function provides a benchmark for direct entanglement calculations in gauge theories and for tests of other duality-based approaches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same duality route could be applied to the $U(1)$ gauge theory, whose dual spin model is well known, to test whether the c-function crossover at $l m_g = 1$ is a universal feature of confining Abelian theories.
  • If the equality $C_n^{\text{Ising}} = C_n^{\text{gauge}}$ holds for higher R\'enyi orders, the method would allow extraction of higher-order entanglement measures in gauge theories, which are otherwise extremely difficult to compute directly.
  • The fitted power-law exponent $c = 0.48(2)$ near $l m_g = 1$ may be related to the scaling dimension of the mass operator, a connection the paper does not explore but which could be tested against analytic predictions.
  • Combining this duality approach with flow-based sampling could extend the same strategy to continuous gauge groups, where non-equilibrium algorithms currently face performance limitations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a Lattice 2024 proceedings contribution in which the authors use Kramers-Wannier duality to compute the entropic c-function C2 of the (2+1)-dimensional Z2 gauge theory from Monte Carlo simulations of the dual Ising model. After reviewing the need for an unambiguous treatment of entanglement in gauge theories, they recall the dual replica construction of [21] and the statement that the Kramers-Wannier duality preserves C_n. They then simulate a two-replica Ising system with a Jarzynski-based estimator, perform thermodynamic and continuum extrapolations, and fit the extrapolated C2(l) to a power law at short distances and to an exponential-integral form at large distances. The fitted large-distance form has amplitude A=0.33(3) and exponent parameter alpha=0.360(19). The authors conclude that these data provide the first numerical confirmation of the Klebanov-Kutasov-Murugan prediction (12) and that the power-law to exponential crossover occurs at l m_g approximately 1.

Significance. The computational approach is sound and the continuum extrapolation is a valuable step: using a spin-model dual to define a replica geometry, combined with a non-equilibrium Monte Carlo estimator, is a promising way to access entanglement quantities that are otherwise ambiguous in lattice gauge theories. The paper also makes good use of external inputs for the CFT normalization [44] and the mass gap [45], and the reported chi-squared values indicate that the quoted fits are internally stable. However, the central claim of confirmation of Eq. (12) is not supported by the fit actually reported, because the fitted exponent alpha deviates from the predicted value 1 by roughly 34 standard deviations. With the free-exponent fit, the result is better described as a measurement of an effective decay rate; the headline conclusion needs to be corrected or supported by a fit with alpha fixed to 1.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (15)] The large-distance fit does not test the prediction (12), because Eq. (15) introduces a free parameter alpha multiplying the mass in the exponent. Equation (12) is the special case alpha=1; the fitted value alpha=0.360(19) is about 34 standard deviations from 1. With alpha free, the fit only checks that the data fall on an exponential envelope and that a smooth decaying curve can be described with an effective scale; it does not confirm that the mass-gap scale appears in the exponent as predicted. The manuscript reports no fit with alpha fixed to 1, no chi-squared for that constrained fit, and no discussion of why the effective decay rate should be 0.36 m_g. Since the 'first numerical confirmation' claim rests on exactly this comparison, the analysis must be redone or the claim must be weakened.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (14)-(15)] The crossover at l m_g approximately 1 is presented as a physical finding, but it is inferred from the breakdown of two phenomenological fits. The fitted alpha affects the natural length scale of the exponential, 1/(2 alpha m_g) approximately 1.4/m_g, so the location of the crossover is not an independent confirmation of the mass-gap scale. To make the crossover claim meaningful, the authors should connect it to a fit in which the predicted mass scale is used, or present it as a property of the specific fitted forms.
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (11)] The gauge-theory interpretation of the Ising c-function is imported from the companion paper [21] without derivation. Because the whole simulation route equates C_2^Ising with C_2^gauge for the replicated slab geometry in the continuum limit, the manuscript should either reproduce the key steps of the proof or state explicitly the conditions under which Eq. (11) holds, including the choice of center and boundary operators. As written, a reader cannot assess whether the measured curve is the gauge-theory c-function or a dual, center-dependent quantity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] There is a typo in the opening sentence: 'One one hand' should be 'On the one hand'.
  2. [Section 3] After Eq. (10), 'Karamers-Wannier' should be 'Kramers-Wannier'.
  3. [Section 4] The phrase 'the inverse mass-gap of the theory m_g' is confusing: m_g is later used as a mass scale in the dimensionless combination l m_g. It should be written as 'the mass gap m_g' or 'the inverse mass gap 1/m_g'.
  4. [Section 4] The sentence 'First, this study [21] is the first numerical confirmation of the prediction (12)' is ambiguous, since [21] is the companion paper and the introduction states that [21] already performed a high-precision test of the conjectures of [16]. The authors should clarify whether the current work is the first continuum-extrapolated confirmation and how it relates to the earlier numerical results in [21].
  5. [Figure 2] The figure would be easier to assess if the continuum-extrapolated data points were shown with their errors and if the fit covariance, or at least the chi-squared for the constrained alpha=1 case, were reported.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the duality bridge from the authors' companion paper is a parameter-free external derivation, and the numerical comparison to the holographic prediction is independent; the free-alpha fit is a correctness caveat, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is: (i) compute the Ising replica partition-function ratio with Jarzynski sampling; (ii) extract C_n via Eq. (10); (iii) identify C_n^Ising with C_n^gauge through Eq. (11), quoted from the authors' own [21]; (iv) compare the continuum-extrapolated C_2 with the holographic form (12) of [16]. No step is defined in terms of the target conclusion. In particular, Eq. (11) is a separate parameter-free statement about Kramers-Wannier duality and the entropic c-function; it does not contain the numerical data or the prediction (12), so the self-citation is a real derivation rather than a circular premise. The normalization and mass scale use independent external inputs ([44] and [45]). The material caveat is non-circular: in Section 4, fit (15) releases the decay coefficient alpha and obtains 0.360(19), roughly 34 sigma from the alpha=1 value encoded in (12), so the comment that the data are 'the first numerical confirmation of the prediction (12)' is under-supported. That is a soundness and claim-calibration issue, not a reduction of the prediction to a fitted input, because the fitted alpha is not renamed as the predicted quantity and the underlying Monte Carlo data are not constructed from (12). Score 2 reflects the load-bearing self-citation to [21] without treating it as circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central analysis rests on two external inputs ([44] for the CFT normalization and [45] for the mass gap), four fit parameters, and the duality-based equality from the authors' own [21]. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • B = 0.360(9)
    Amplitude of the power-law fit to the normalized c-function at short distances, Eq. (14).
  • c = 0.48(2)
    Exponent of the power-law fit, Eq. (14).
  • A = 0.33(3)
    Amplitude of the exponential fit, Eq. (15).
  • alpha = 0.360(19)
    Effective mass parameter in the exponential decay law, Eq. (15). This is the key fitted parameter; it comes out far from the expected value 1 (lightest glueball mass), which undermines the claim of confirmation.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kramers-Wannier duality maps the 3D Ising model to the 3D Z2 gauge theory preserving the partition function up to numerical factors.
    Used in Section 3, Eqs. (5)-(8), to connect the spin model and gauge theory.
  • domain assumption The entropic c-functions of the dual theories are equal, C_n^Ising = C_n^gauge.
    Load-bearing premise from the authors' prior work [21], invoked in Eq. (11). If this fails, simulating the Ising model cannot probe the gauge theory c-function.
  • standard math The replica trick Tr rho_A^n = Z_n / Z^n and its lattice discretization with a slab subregion are valid.
    Used in Sections 1 and 4, Eqs. (1), (2), and (10).
  • domain assumption The continuum limit can be obtained by the thermodynamic and continuum extrapolation described, using the scale setting of [42].
    Section 4, paragraph on Monte Carlo simulations and scale setting.
  • domain assumption The holographic prediction (12) for the glueball gas applies with the mass m equal to the mass gap m_g.
    Section 4, Eq. (12) and comparison with [16]. The fit with alpha as a free parameter weakens this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4LCWI5NS

@misc{pith2026241117231,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4LCWI5NS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17231}
}
abstract

The study of entanglement in quantum field theories provides insight into universal properties which are typically challenging to extract by means of local observables. However, calculations of quantities related to entanglement in gauge theories are limited by ambiguities that stem from the non-factorizability of the Hilbert space. On the other hand, (2+1)-dimensional lattice gauge theories are known to admit a dual description in terms of spin models, for which the replica trick and R\'enyi entropies are well defined. In this contribution, we exploit Kramers-Wannier duality to perform a numerical study of the entropic c-function of the (2+1)-dimensional $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge theory in the continuum limit. Our results are compared with analytical predictions from holographic models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17231 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of a thermodynamic (left panel) and a continuum (right panel) limits. the two spatial directions, and with thickness 𝑙/𝑎 in the other one. In all the simulations we fixed the length of the Euclidean time direction to be at least 10 𝑁𝜏,𝑐, where 𝑁𝜏,𝑐 is the critical length of the deconfinement transition for the Z2 gauge theory. In this regime, thermal fluctuations are suppressed and 𝐶2 receives contributio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Thermodynamic and continuum extrapolation of 𝐶2 in the (2 + 1)-dimensional Z2 gauge theory. Data are compared with two models, a power-law decay at short distances (compared to the inverse mass-gap), and an exponential decay at large distances. constant 𝐶2 = 𝑙 ∫ d k exp  −2 √︁ 𝑚2 + k 2 𝑙  , (12) where 𝑙 is the length of the slab and 𝑚 the mass of the scalar. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symmetry Packaging I: Irreducible Representation Blocks, Superselection, and Packaged Entanglement in Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Gauge-theory excitations carry their full quantum numbers as indivisible representation blocks; the paper proposes packaging as a universal principle that yields superselection rules and a new class of locked entangle...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [21]

    Bulgarelli and M

    A. Bulgarelli and M. Panero,Duality transformations and the entanglement entropy of gauge theories, JHEP 06(2024) 041, [2404.01987]. 9 Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories Andrea Bulgarelli

    arXiv 2024

  2. [44]

    B.Kulchytskyy,L.E.H.SierensandR.G.Melko, UniversaldivergenceoftheRényientropyof a thinly sliced torus at the Ising fixed point,Phys. Rev. B100(2019) 045139, [1904.08955]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [45]

    The Spectrum of the 2+1 Dimensional Gauge Ising Model

    V. Agostini, G. Carlino, M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch, The Spectrum of the (2+1)- dimensional gauge Ising model,Nucl. Phys. B484 (1997) 331–352, [hep-lat/9607029]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  4. [1]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki and K. Horodecki,Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 865–942, [quant-ph/0702225]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [2]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [3]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico and A. Kitaev,Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 227902, [quant-ph/0211074]

    arXiv 2003

  7. [4]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 181602, [hep-th/0603001]. 8 Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories Andrea Bulgarelli

    arXiv 2006

  8. [5]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav.42 (2010) 2323–2329, [1005.3035]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 47 references
  1. [6]

    Vidal,Entanglement monotones, J

    G. Vidal,Entanglement monotones, J. Mod. Opt.47(2000) 355, [quant-ph/9807077]

    2000 arXiv

  2. [7]

    P. V. Buividovich and M. I. Polikarpov,Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings,Phys. Lett.B670(2008) 141–145, [0806.3376]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Donnelly,Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory,Phys

    W. Donnelly,Decomposition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theory,Phys. Rev.D85 (2012) 085004, [1109.0036]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and J. A. Rosabal,Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 085012, [1312.1183]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Radičević,Notes on Entanglement in Abelian Gauge Theories, 1404.1391

    Ð. Radičević,Notes on Entanglement in Abelian Gauge Theories, 1404.1391

    arXiv

  6. [11]

    Ghosh, R

    S. Ghosh, R. M. Soni and S. P. Trivedi,On The Entanglement Entropy For Gauge Theories, JHEP 09 (2015) 069, [1501.02593]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [12]

    S. Aoki, T. Iritani, M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba and H. Tasaki,On the definition of entanglement entropy in lattice gauge theories,JHEP 06 (2015) 187, [1502.04267]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Ð.Radičević, EntanglementinWeaklyCoupledLatticeGaugeTheories ,JHEP 04(2016)163, [1509.08478]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [14]

    R. M. Soni and S. P. Trivedi,Aspects of Entanglement Entropy for Gauge Theories,JHEP 01 (2016) 136, [1510.07455]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Lin and D

    J. Lin and D. Radičević,Comments on defining entanglement entropy, Nucl. Phys. B958 (2020) 115118, [1808.05939]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [16]

    I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov and A. Murugan,Entanglement as a probe of confinement, Nucl. Phys. B796(2008) 274–293, [0709.2140]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [17]

    P. V. Buividovich and M. I. Polikarpov,Numerical study of entanglement entropy in SU(2) lattice gauge theory,Nucl. Phys.B802(2008) 458–474, [0802.4247]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [18]

    E. Itou, K. Nagata, Y. Nakagawa, A. Nakamura and V. I. Zakharov,Entanglement in Four- Dimensional SU(3) Gauge Theory,PTEP 2016 (2016) 061B01, [1512.01334]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Rabenstein, N

    A. Rabenstein, N. Bodendorfer, P. Buividovich and A. Schäfer,Lattice study of Rényi en- tanglement entropy in𝑆𝑈(𝑁𝑐) lattice Yang-Mills theory with𝑁𝑐 = 2, 3, 4, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 034504, [1812.04279]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [20]

    N.Jokela,K.Rummukainen,A.Salami,A.PönniandT.Rindlisbacher, Progressinthelattice evaluationofentanglemententropyofthree-dimensionalYang-Millstheoriesandholographic bulk reconstruction, JHEP 12(2023) 137, [2304.08949]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Amorosso, S

    R. Amorosso, S. Syritsyn and R. Venugopalan,Entanglement entropy of a color flux tube in (2+1)D Yang-Mills theory, 2410.00112

    arXiv

  17. [23]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002, [hep-th/0405152]

    2004 arXiv

  18. [24]

    ,Phys.Rev

    H.KramersandG.Wannier, Statisticsofthetwo-dimensionalferromagnet.Part1. ,Phys.Rev. 60 (1941) 252–262

    1941

  19. [25]

    Kramers and G

    H. Kramers and G. Wannier,Statistics of the Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet. Part II, Phys. Rev. 60 (1941) 263–276

    1941

  20. [26]

    A.BulgarelliandM.Panero, Entanglemententropyfromnon-equilibriumMonteCarlosimu- lations,JHEP 06 (2023) 030, [2304.03311]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Entanglement entropy for a Maxwell field: Numerical calculation on a two dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 105013, [1406.2991]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Savit, Duality in field theory and statistical systems, Rev

    R. Savit, Duality in field theory and statistical systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (Apr, 1980) 453–487

    1980

  23. [29]

    B 83(2011) 115127, [1007.4145]

    L.TagliacozzoandG.Vidal, EntanglementRenormalizationandGaugeSymmetry ,Phys.Rev. B 83(2011) 115127, [1007.4145]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [30]

    U.Moitra,R.M.SoniandS.P.Trivedi, EntanglementEntropy,RelativeEntropyandDuality , JHEP 08 (2019) 059, [1811.06986]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy, J. Phys. A40 (2007) 7031–7036, [cond-mat/0610375]

    2007 arXiv

  26. [32]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730–732. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.43, 565 (1986)]

    1986

  27. [33]

    78(1997) 2690–2693, [cond-mat/9610209]

    C.Jarzynski, NonequilibriumEqualityforFreeEnergyDifferences ,Phys.Rev.Lett. 78(1997) 2690–2693, [cond-mat/9610209]

    1997 arXiv

  28. [34]

    M.Caselle,G.Costagliola,A.Nada,M.PaneroandA.Toniato, Jarzynski’stheoremforlattice gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 034503, [1604.05544]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Caselle, A

    M. Caselle, A. Nada and M. Panero,QCD thermodynamics from lattice calculations with nonequilibrium methods: The SU(3) equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 054513, [1801.03110]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Francesconi, M

    O. Francesconi, M. Panero and D. Preti,Strong coupling from non-equilibrium Monte Carlo simulations,JHEP 07 (2020) 233, [2003.13734]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [37]

    10 Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories Andrea Bulgarelli

    M.Caselle,E.Cellini,A.NadaandM.Panero, Stochasticnormalizingflowsasnon-equilibrium transformations,JHEP 07 (2022) 015, [2201.08862]. 10 Duality and entanglement in lattice gauge theories Andrea Bulgarelli

    2022 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Bonanno, A

    C. Bonanno, A. Nada and D. Vadacchino,Mitigating topological freezing using out-of- equilibrium simulations,JHEP 04 (2024) 126, [2402.06561]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Caselle, E

    M. Caselle, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, 2409.15937

    arXiv

  34. [40]

    Bulgarelli, E

    A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini and A. Nada,Sampling SU(3) pure gauge theory with Stochas- tic Normalizing Flows, in41st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, 9, 2024, 2409.18861

    2024 arXiv

  35. [41]

    E 95(2017) 062132, [1609.02157]

    V.Alba, Out-of-equilibriumprotocolforRényientropiesviatheJarzynskiequality ,Phys.Rev. E 95(2017) 062132, [1609.02157]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Caselle and M

    M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch,Deconfinement transition and dimensional crossover in the 3-D gauge Ising model, Nucl. Phys. B470 (1996) 435–453, [hep-lat/9511015]

    1996 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive scalar field in two dimensions, J. Stat. Mech.0512 (2005) P12012, [cond-mat/0511014]

    2005 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Florio,Two-fermion negativity and confinement in the Schwinger model,Phys

    A. Florio,Two-fermion negativity and confinement in the Schwinger model,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) L071501, [2312.05298]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    A.Bulgarelli,E.Cellini,K.Jansen,S.Kühn,A.Nada,S.Nakajimaetal., Flow-basedSampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, 2410.14466. 11

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.