Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Concentric-ring patterns of higher-order lumps in the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili I equation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Generic higher-order lumps of KP-I split into concentric rings, with lump positions from roots of a two-term polynomial.

desk verdict New concentric-ring asymptotics for KP-I lumps, with Theorem 1 solid and Theorem 2 conditional on an unproved root-simplicity conjecture that the abstract should flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17364 v1 pith:GKNNGZYF submitted 2024-11-26 nlin.SI nlin.PS

Bo Yang , Jianke Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SInlin.PS MSC 35Q5337K10
keywords KP-Iequationhigher-orderlumpsmulti-poleconcentric-ringpatternslarge-timeasymptoticsWronskian-HermitepolynomialsSchurfundamental
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes what a generic higher-order lump solution of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I (KP-I) equation looks like at large times. It claims that for the index vector $\Lambda=(1,3,\ldots,2N-1)$ and generic internal parameters, the solution breaks into $N(N+1)/2$ fundamental lumps arranged on $[N/2]$ concentric rings centered at $(x,y)=(12t,0)$, with an extra central lump for odd $N$. On the $r$-th ring, $2N-1-4(r-1)$ lumps sit at positions given explicitly through roots of a two-term polynomial. For other index vectors, the outer region follows Wronskian–Hermite roots while the inner region again forms concentric rings. This turns a complicated nonlinear interaction into explicit algebraic predictions that are verified numerically.

What carries the argument

The argument rewrites the tau-function $\sigma$ in Lemma 1 as a large determinant and expands it by Laplace, so that at large $|t|$ it is essentially $|\det_{1\le i,j\le N}\Phi_{i,j}|^2$. In the moving frame $\hat{x}=x-12t$, the dominant part of $\Phi$ factorises as $F(P_1+E^{-1}G E P_2)$, where $G=F^{-1}DF$ with $D=\operatorname{diag}(a_{1,1},\dots,a_{N,1})$ and $P_k$ are Schur-polynomial matrices. Under Assumption 1 the lower-left $[N/2]\times[N/2]$ corner of $G$ admits an $AB$ factorization whose diagonal entries are $\beta_{r,r}=M_r/M_{r-1}$; these enter the two-term polynomial $Q_n(z;\beta)=z^{n(n+1)/2}/\kappa_n+\beta z^{(n-2)(n-1)/2}/\kappa_{n-2}$, with $\kappa_n=\prod_{j=1}^n(2j-1)!!$, whose roots are exactly the $(2n-1)$-th roots of $-\beta(2n-1)!!(2n-3)!!$. The ring positions are these roots scaled by the appropriate power of $|t|$. For general index vectors the same determinant machinery yields the Wronskian–Hermite polynomial in the outer region and a similar $AB$ factorization for the inner rings.

What would settle it

Compute the exact solution for $\Lambda=(1,3,5,7,9)$ with $a_{i,1}=(0,1,1,1,-1)$ at large times: Theorem 1 predicts two rings of 9 and 5 lumps plus a central lump, with outer-ring position errors decaying as $O(|t|^{-1/9})$ and inner-ring errors as $O(|t|^{-1/5})$. If at $t=5000$ the lump positions are not within those predicted errors, or if random parameters satisfying Assumption 1 give a different ring count, the claim fails. For Theorem 2, with $\Lambda=(3,5,7,9,4)$ and the paper's parameters, the prediction is 12 outer lumps from Wronskian–Hermite roots and an inner ring of 5 plus a center lump; exhibiting a Wronskian–Hermite polynomial with a multiple nonzero root would also break the outer count.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the large-time pattern of a generic higher-order lump of the KP-I equation is not triangular but a set of concentric rings. Concretely, for $\Lambda=(1,3,\dots,2N-1)$ and internal parameters satisfying Assumption 1, the solution splits into $N(N+1)/2$ fundamental lumps: the outer $r$-th ring contains $2N-1-4(r-1)$ lumps whose positions satisfy $x_0+2iy_0=z_0(-12t)^{(N-1-2(r-1))/(2N-1-4(r-1))}(1+O(|t|^{-1/(2N-1-4(r-1))}))$, where $z_0$ runs over the roots of an explicit two-term polynomial; for odd $N$ an additional lump sits near the ring center. For $\Lambda\neq(1,3,\dots,2N-1)$, Theorem 2 states that the outer region contains lumps at $x_0+2iy_0=z_0(-12t)^{1/2}$ for each nonzero simple root of the Wronskian–Hermite polynomial $W_{\Lambda}(z)$, while the inner region again contains concentric rings of $d(d+1)/2$ lumps where $d$ is the parity imbalance of the index vector. The paper proves these by asymptotic analysis of the determinant in Lemma 1 and verifies them numerically on four examples, including the predicted decay rates of the position error.

Load-bearing premise

The results stand only if the algebraic conditions on internal parameters stated as Assumptions 1 and 2 hold for generic choices—an assumption the paper states but does not prove—and, outside the main case, only if a cited conjecture that all nonzero roots of certain Wronskian–Hermite polynomials are simple is true.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, generic higher-order lumps of KP-I are predictable at large times: their lump counts and positions are given by explicit root formulae, with no special-polynomial root data needed in the generic case.
  • The ring separation rates are exactly $|t|^{m/(2m+1)}$ for positive integers $m$ that differ from ring to ring, refining the earlier bound $1/3\le q\le 1/2$.
  • For odd $N$ the ring pattern is the same at large positive and negative times, while for even $N$ it is antisymmetric, giving a sharp odd/even distinction.
  • For $\Lambda\neq(1,3,\ldots,2N-1)$, the outer $O(|t|^{1/2})$ pattern depends only on the index vector, not on internal parameters, so many different higher-order lumps share the same outer skeleton.
  • When the generic assumptions fail, different patterns such as ring-plus-triangle appear, showing the ring pattern is not universal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same determinant-expansion and $AB$-factorization mechanism may transfer to other integrable equations with higher-order lump or rogue-wave solutions; one could test whether generic higher-order NLS rogue waves also form concentric rings.
  • The word 'generic' in Assumption 1 can be tested by random sampling of internal parameters: if a positive-measure set violates the minor conditions, the main theorem would need a different hypothesis.
  • The appearance of a two-term polynomial suggests that generic parameter regimes are algebraically simpler than the special regimes studied earlier, so numerical experiments that tune internal parameters could observe a clear transition from triangular to concentric-ring patterns.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies large-time patterns of general higher-order lump solutions of the KP-I equation. For the index vector Lambda=(1,3,...,2N-1), it states Theorem 1, asserting that under Assumption 1 the solution splits into N(N+1)/2 fundamental lumps lying on [N/2] concentric rings, with explicit leading-order positions and separation rates |t|^{m/(2m+1)}. For other index vectors, Theorem 2 claims an outer region described by nonzero roots of the Wronskian-Hermite polynomial and an inner region of concentric rings controlled by new parameters beta-hat. The proofs are based on Laplace expansion of a block determinant and asymptotic reduction of the determinant det(Phi), with the ring positions derived from a two-term polynomial Q_n(z;beta). Four numerical examples compare predicted and true lump positions and verify the predicted error decay rates.

Significance. The concentric-ring pattern is a genuinely new, surprising phenomenon for generic higher-order lumps of KP-I, and the leading-order predictions are explicit and parameter-free in the sense that the coefficients beta_{r,r} are computed from the internal parameter matrix G rather than fitted. The paper also supplies quantitative numerical verification of positions and of the decay exponents O(|t|^{-1/(2N-1-4(r-1))}) in two cases for Theorem 1 and two cases for Theorem 2. If the gap in the proof for intermediate rings is filled and the conditional nature of the Wronskian-Hermite root part is made explicit, the results would be a solid contribution to the asymptotic theory of KP-I lumps. As it stands, the central new theorem is proven in detail only for the outer ring, the second ring, and the even-N innermost ring, while the remaining rings are delegated to a sketched 'little modification'.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V, Theorem 2 and Eq. (86)–(87)] The outer-region part of Theorem 2 is conditional on the unproved conjecture, taken from Ref. [28], that all nonzero roots of Wronskian-Hermite polynomials are simple. This is load-bearing: the count N_W in Eq. (86) and the one-lump-per-root identification in Eq. (87) require exactly N_W distinct simple roots. If a root is multiple, the formula (87) does not describe isolated fundamental lumps, and the asserted outer-lump number fails. Although the theorem statement does include the simplicity condition, the abstract and introduction present the outer-region pattern as an established fact. The manuscript should either prove the needed simplicity statement for the relevant Wronskian-Hermite polynomials or explicitly state that this part of Theorem 2 is a conditional result depending on an open conjecture, and the abstract should be adjusted accordingly.
  2. [Section IV C and Section VI] The proof of Theorem 1 for intermediate rings and for the odd-N innermost ring is only sketched. The text says that 'for higher r values ... the proof of Theorem 1 proceeds with little modification' and gives no reduced determinant formula analogous to Eqs. (69) and (77) for general r. Since Theorem 1's full statement covers all [N/2] rings, the derivation for 3 <= r <= [N/2]-1 and the odd-N innermost ring is a genuine gap, not merely a presentational issue. The same abbreviated reduction is used to justify the inner-region part of Theorem 2 in Section VI. The authors should provide the general reduced determinant and the resulting error estimate for every r.
  3. [Section III A and Section V B3] The assertions that Assumption 1 and Assumption 2 'hold for generic' parameter values are not proved. No argument is given that the set where the minors M_r or M-hat_r vanish is a proper algebraic subset of the parameter space; in particular, no nontrivial polynomial is exhibited. Because the abstract uses the word 'generically' for the main claims, the genericity statement is load-bearing. The authors should either prove that the non-vanishing conditions hold on a Zariski-open dense set or reformulate the theorems as conditional on Assumptions 1 and 2 without the generic claim.
  4. [Section VII, discussion of nongeneric parameters] The discussion of nongeneric parameters in Section VII shows that when M2=0 but M1≠0 for N=5, the pattern is 'a single ring of nine fundamental lumps plus a triangle of six fundamental lumps inside the ring.' This statement is presented without derivation or numerical verification. If included, it should be supported by at least a sketch of the asymptotic calculation or a numerical example; otherwise it should be explicitly labeled as a conjecture or postponed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1, Eq. (22) text] In the sentence introducing Eq. (22), 'neighrborhood' is a typo and should read 'neighborhood'.
  2. [Theorem 2, Eq. (88) and surrounding text] The range of r in the sentence defining beta-hat is written as '1 ≤ r ≤ [r/2]'; this should be '1 ≤ r ≤ [d/2]'.
  3. [Section V C and Section III B] The formulas for the center-lump position, x0+2iy0 = -β-tilde, are stated without derivation details. Since this is presented as a minor point, a brief derivation or a reference to the calculation leading to Eq. (22) would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Figures and text] In the captions of Figs. 1, 4, 6 and 9, the axis label uses a hat over x that is explained in the text; please make the captions self-contained by repeating that x-hat = x - 12t.
  5. [Eq. (37)-(38)] The notation T_k is used both for the large-time variable in Eq. (38) and for the moving x-coordinate substitution; this is clear in context but may be confusing. Consider renaming one of them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted lump positions are obtained by direct asymptotic expansion of an explicit determinant formula, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central results (Theorem 1 and Theorem 2) are derived by taking the explicit higher-order lump formula from Lemma 1 and performing systematic large-|t| asymptotic expansions of the determinant sigma. The ring radii and lump positions in Eq. (22) are expressed in terms of constants beta_{r,r} computed from the parameter matrix G via the factorization (19)-(21); these constants are algebraic functions of the input parameters a_{i,1}, not quantities fitted to lump locations. The numerical comparisons in Sections III C and V D compare the leading-order formulas against the same explicit solution formula, which is a standard asymptotic-verification procedure and not circular. The citation to the authors' earlier work [23] supplies Lemma 1 and the degree formula for Wronskian-Hermite polynomials; these are explicit, checkable algebraic facts and are not equivalent to the target ring/lump predictions. The Q_n polynomial identity is quoted from [27] and is an independent algebraic identity. The only genuine caveat is that Theorem 2 is conditional on the external conjecture from [28] that all nonzero roots of Wronskian-Hermite polynomials are simple; if that conjecture fails, the outer-region lump count and positions in Eqs. (86)-(87) would need modification. That is a correctness/conditionality concern, not a circularity: the paper does not define its predictions in terms of themselves, and the condition is not manufactured by the authors. No step in the derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the explicit determinant representation of higher-order lumps, the generic algebraic conditions in Assumptions 1 and 2, and, for Theorem 2, the unproved simplicity conjecture for Wronskian-Hermite roots. No free parameters are fitted: the internal parameters a_{i,j} are inputs of the solution family, and the beta_{r,r} values are derived from the matrix G. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The explicit higher-order lump formula in Lemma 1 is correct and complete for general N-th order lumps.
    The entire asymptotic analysis starts from this determinant formula reproduced from the authors' prior work [23]; correctness and completeness of this representation is assumed.
  • domain assumption Assumptions 1 and 2, the generic non-vanishing minor conditions on internal parameters, hold.
    Theorems 1 and 2 are conditional on these algebraic conditions; the paper states they hold generically but gives no measure-zero proof, and Section VII shows a nongeneric example with a different pattern.
  • domain assumption All nonzero roots of Wronskian-Hermite polynomials are simple, as conjectured in Ref. [28].
    Theorem 2's outer-region lump count and positions require N_W simple roots; the theorem explicitly conditions on this conjecture, which the abstract omits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Concentric-ring patterns of higher-order lumps in the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili I equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GKNNGZYF

@misc{pith2026241117364,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Concentric-ring patterns of higher-order lumps in the Kadomtsev--Petviashvili I equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GKNNGZYF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17364}
}
abstract

Large-time patterns of general higher-order lump solutions in the KP-I equation are investigated. It is shown that when the index vector of the general lump solution is a sequence of consecutive odd integers starting from one, the large-time pattern in the spatial $(x, y)$ plane generically would comprise fundamental lumps uniformly distributed on concentric rings. For other index vectors, the large-time pattern would comprise fundamental lumps in the outer region as described analytically by the nonzero-root structure of the associated Wronskian-Hermit polynomial, together with possible fundamental lumps in the inner region that are uniformly distributed on concentric rings generically. Leading-order predictions of fundamental lumps in these solution patterns are also derived. The predicted patterns at large times are compared to true solutions, and good agreement is observed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17364 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The true solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Leading-order predictions of lump patterns from Theorem 1 for the solution of Fig. 1 at large times of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Verification of the decay rate of relative error in leading-order predictions of fundamental lumps’ positions in Eq. (22) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The true solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Leading-order predictions of lump patterns from Theorem 1 for the solution of Fig. 4 at large times of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The true solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Leading-order predictions of lump patterns from Theorem 2 for the solution of Fig. 6 at large times of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Verification of the decay rate of relative error in leading-order predictions of fundamental lumps’ positions in Eq. (88) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The true solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Leading-order predictions of lump patterns from Theorem 2 for the solution of Fig. 9 at large times of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Asymptotic analysis of multilump solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili-I equation

    J.H. Chang, “Asymptotic analysis of multilump solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili-I equation”, Theor. Math. Phys. 195, 676-689 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [1]

    (22) with N = 6 and r = 1, 2, 3

    Using these values, we can obtain leading-order predictions of lump positions on these three rings from Eq. (22) with N = 6 and r = 1, 2, 3. These predicted solutions at large times of t = ±5000 are plotted in Fig. 5. Comparing these predictions with true solutions at t = ±5000 in Fig. 4, we can see that the predictions agree with true solutions very well...

    work page

  3. [2]

    In the outer region, the (x0, y0) positions of these NW fundamental lumps u1(x − x0, y− y0, t) are given by the equation x0 + 2iy0 = z0 (−12t) 1 2 1 + O |t|− 1 2 , (87) where z0 is each of the NW nonzero simple roots of WΛ(z)

    work page

  4. [3]

    In the inner region, under Assumption 2 of the next subsection (which holds generically for general internal parameter values), these d(d + 1)/2 fundamental lumps will be located on [d/2] concentric rings centered at 16 (x, y) = (12t, 0), with one of them also located in the O(1) neighborhood of the ring center when d is odd. The r- th ring (counting from...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Notations for the case ofkodd − keven > 1 In this case, there are more odd indices than even indices in Λ, andd = kodd −keven, where d is as defined in Eq. (85). We group such indices such that n1 < n2 < · · ·< nkodd are all odd indices, followed by ˆn1 < ˆn2 < · · ·< ˆnkeven which are all even indices, with kodd + keven = N . That is, Λ = ( n1, n2, . . ....

    work page

  6. [5]

    Notations for the case ofkeven − kodd > 2 In this case, there are more even indices than odd indices in Λ, and d = keven − kodd − 1, where d is as defined in Eq. (85). Now, we group such indices such that n1 < n2 < · · ·< nkeven are all even indices, followed by ˆn1 < ˆn2 < · · ·< ˆnkodd which are all odd indices, with keven + kodd = N . That is, Λ = ( n1...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Assumption 2

    The assumption and ˆβr,r values Under the above notations, our assumption for Theorem 2 is the following. Assumption 2. We assume that cMr ̸= 0, r = 1, 2, . . . ,[d/2] − 1; cM[d/2] cM[d/2]−1 ̸= 0, when d is odd, − 4 3 , when d is even, (104) where cMr is defined in Eq. (96) for the case of kodd−keven > 1 and in Eq. (103) for the case of keven−kodd > 2. Th...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Ablowitz and P.A

    M.J. Ablowitz and P.A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering(Cambridge University Press, 1991)

    work page 1991

Show all 35 references
  1. [8]

    On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersive media

    B.B. Kadomtsev and V.I. Petviashvili, “On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersive media”, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 15, 539-541 (1970)

    1970

  2. [9]

    On the evolution of packets of water waves

    M.J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, “On the evolution of packets of water waves”, J. Fluid Mech. 92, 691-715 (1979)

    1979

  3. [10]

    Self-focusing of plane dark solitons in nonlinear defocusing media

    D.E. Pelinovsky, Yu.A. Stepanyants and Yu.A. Kivshar, “Self-focusing of plane dark solitons in nonlinear defocusing media”, Phys. Rev. E 51, 5016-5026 (1995)

    1995

  4. [11]

    Soliton-like bubbles in the system of interacting bosons

    I.V. Barashenkov and V.G. Makhankov, “Soliton-like bubbles in the system of interacting bosons”, Phys. Lett. A 128, 52-56 (1988)

    1988

  5. [12]

    Solitons in two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates

    S. Tsuchiya, F. Dalfovo and L.P. Pitaevskii, “Solitons in two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates”, Phys. Rev. A 77, 045601 (2008)

    2008

  6. [13]

    Novikov, S.V

    S. Novikov, S.V. Manakov, L.P. Pitaevskii and V.E. Zakharov, Theory of solitons: the inverse scattering method(Plenum, 1984)

    1984

  7. [14]

    New multisoliton solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation

    D.E. Pelinovsky and Yu. A. Stepanyants, “New multisoliton solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation”, JETP Lett. 57, 24-28 (1993)

    1993

  8. [15]

    Equation of an extraordinary soliton

    V.I. Petviashvili, “Equation of an extraordinary soliton”, Plasma Physics 2, 469-472 (1976). 28

    1976

  9. [16]

    Two-dimensional solitons of the Kadomtsev– Petviashvili equation and their interaction

    S.V. Manakov, V.E. Zakharov, L.A. Bordag, A.R. Its and V.B. Matveev, “Two-dimensional solitons of the Kadomtsev– Petviashvili equation and their interaction”. Phys. Lett. A 63, 205-206 (1977)

    1977

  10. [17]

    Two-dimensional lumps in nonlinear dispersive systems

    J. Satsuma and M.J. Ablowitz, “Two-dimensional lumps in nonlinear dispersive systems”, J. Math. Phys. 20, 1496 (1979)

    1979

  11. [18]

    Normal and anomalous scattering, formation and decay of bound states of two-dimensional solitons described by the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation,

    K. A. Gorshkov, D. E. Pelinovsky, and Yu. A. Stepanyants, “Normal and anomalous scattering, formation and decay of bound states of two-dimensional solitons described by the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation,” JETP 77, 237-245 (1993)

    1993

  12. [19]

    Solutions to the time dependent Schr¨ odinger and the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equations,

    M.J. Ablowitz and J. Villarroel, “Solutions to the time dependent Schr¨ odinger and the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 570-573 (1997)

    1997

  13. [20]

    A novel class of solutions of the non-stationary Schr¨ odinger and the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equations

    M.J. Ablowitz, S. Chakravarty, A.D. Trubatch and J. Villarroel, “A novel class of solutions of the non-stationary Schr¨ odinger and the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equations”, Phys. Lett. A 267, 132-146 (2000)

    2000

  14. [21]

    Rational solutions to the KPI equation from particular polynomials

    P. Gaillard, “Rational solutions to the KPI equation from particular polynomials”, Wave Motion 108, 102828 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    On multi-rogue wave solutions of the NLS equation and positon solutions of the KdV equation

    P. Dubard, P. Gaillard, C. Klein and V.B. Matveev, “On multi-rogue wave solutions of the NLS equation and positon solutions of the KdV equation”, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 185, 247-258 (2010)

    2010

  16. [23]

    In that case, G is proportional to an identity matrix and thus cM1 = 0, violating this assumption

    where all ai,1’s were equal to each other. In that case, G is proportional to an identity matrix and thus cM1 = 0, violating this assumption. Because of that, the concentric-ring pattern of lumps in the inner region as predicted by Theorem 2 does not apply to the previous case...

  17. [24]

    Multi-rogue waves solutions: from the NLS to the KP-I equation

    P. Dubard and V.B. Matveev, “Multi-rogue waves solutions: from the NLS to the KP-I equation”, Nonlinearity 26, R93-R125 (2013)

    2013

  18. [25]

    Families of rational solution solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equation

    S. Chen, P. Grelu, D. Mihalache and F. Baronio, “Families of rational solution solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equation”, Rom. Rep. Phys. 68, 1407-1424 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Rational solutions of the Boussinesq equation and applications to rogue waves

    P.A. Clarkson and E. Dowie, “Rational solutions of the Boussinesq equation and applications to rogue waves”, Trans. Math. Appl. 1, 1-26 (2017)

    2017

  20. [27]

    Multiparametric families of solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili-I equation, the structure of their rational representations, and multi-rogue waves

    P. Gaillard, “Multiparametric families of solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili-I equation, the structure of their rational representations, and multi-rogue waves”, Theor. Math. Phys. 196, 1174-1199 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Lump molecules in fluid systems: Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I case

    Z. Zhang, B. Li, A. Wazwaz and Q. Guo, “Lump molecules in fluid systems: Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I case”, Phys. Lett. A 424, 127848 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Pattern transformation in higher-order lumps of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equation

    B. Yang and J. Yang, “Pattern transformation in higher-order lumps of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equation”, J. Nonl. Sci. 32, 52 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Classification of KPI lumps

    S. Chakravarty and M. Zowada, “Classification of KPI lumps”, J. Phys. A 55, 215701 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Multi-lump wave patterns of KPI via integer partitions

    S. Chakravarty and M. Zowada, “Multi-lump wave patterns of KPI via integer partitions”, Physica D 446, 133644 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Modified equations, rational solutions, and the Painlev´ e property for the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili and Hirota– Satsuma equations

    J. Weiss, “Modified equations, rational solutions, and the Painlev´ e property for the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili and Hirota– Satsuma equations”, J. Math. Phys. 26, 2174 (1985)

    1985

  26. [34]

    General high-order rogue waves and their dynamics in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    Y. Ohta and J. Yang, “General high-order rogue waves and their dynamics in the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 468, 1716 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Zeros of Wronskians of Hermite polynomials and Young diagrams

    G. Felder, A.D. Hemery and A.P. Veselov, “Zeros of Wronskians of Hermite polynomials and Young diagrams”, Physica D 241, 2131-2137 (2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.