Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 175 references

What is the amount of baryonic dark matter in galaxies?

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that dust-type baryonic dark matter may be ten to a hundred times more abundant in galaxies than standard models estimate.

desk verdict The paper's central claim is an input, not a prediction, and it ignores the microlensing constraint that excludes the proposed population; the compilation of large-particle size distributions is still useful. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17775 v1 pith:YCCUDLL4 submitted 2024-11-26 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Václav Vavryčuk This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords baryonicdarkmatterinterstellardustcold-bodymodelpower-lawsizedistributionsubmillimeterexcessMRNgalaxymassingalaxies
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper re-examines how much baryonic mass in galaxies is hidden in dust. It argues that current dust models, which restrict grains to submicron sizes, are incomplete and based on a priori assumptions, leading to a circularity problem. By extending the observed power-law size distribution of solid bodies from asteroids and meteoroids to interstellar space, the paper constructs a Cold-Body model in which most dark matter is baryonic dust concentrated in large compact bodies. If correct, the baryonic dust mass in galaxies would be at least an order of magnitude higher than previously assumed, which would reshape the understanding of galaxy dynamics and evolution.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Cold-Body (CB) model, which replaces the MRN model's sharp size cutoff with a continuous power-law size distribution dN ~ a^-gamma da spanning from nanometer grains to bodies $5x10^{8}$ meters across. The size index gamma is tuned (in the range 3.5 to 3.75) so that the total mass of the distribution equals the dark matter mass of the Galaxy, while the small-grain end still matches the MRN-model dust mass. The argument rests on the observational anchoring of this power law: gamma ~ 3.5-4.0 is measured for large particles and compact bodies in the Solar System, planetary systems, and exoplanet populations, and the 'Oumuamua detection pins the number density at the ~100 m size bin. The model also predicts flatter spectral emissivity indices ($\beta$ ~ 1.2-1.7) and higher long-wavelength extinction, which the paper identifies with the observed FIR and submillimeter excess in galaxy SEDs.

What would settle it

Count interstellar bodies in the roughly 1 m to $10^{5}$ m size range using upcoming all-sky surveys or occultation networks (e.g., from the Vera Rubin Observatory or the planned space-based surveys). If the measured number densities fall substantially below the CB-model prediction—which is anchored to the observed 'Oumuamua density and the dark-matter mass normalization—the central claim of a tenfold baryonic dust excess would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper asserts that the standard MRN dust model and its modifications miss the majority of baryonic dark matter because they impose a sharp cutoff at grain sizes around a few hundred nanometers. Observationally, the size distribution of solid matter across diverse environments—satellite-detected dust, meteoroids, asteroids, Kuiper Belt objects, exoplanets, and interstellar objects like 'Oumuamua—follows a power law with a differential size index gamma of roughly 3.5 to 4.0 over many orders of magnitude in size. The paper's Cold-Body model extends this same power-law distribution to interstellar space over radii from $5x10^{-9}$ m to $5x10^{8}$ m, and fixes the normalization so that the total dust mass equals the estimated dark matter mass of the Galaxy. This yields dust masses that are one to two orders of magnitude larger than current estimates, with most mass concentrated in large compact bodies that are nearly invisible to standard extinction and emission diagnostics, while still producing the observed submillimeter excess and matching the number density of 'Oumuamua-like objects.

Load-bearing premise

The CB model assumes that the power-law size distribution measured for asteroids, meteoroids, and exoplanets continues unchanged through interstellar space out to bodies 500 million meters across, and that these bodies are abundant enough to hold most of the galaxy's dark matter; no direct interstellar observation currently measures this population at the required density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the CB model is correct, the baryonic dust mass of the Milky Way and other galaxies is at least an order of magnitude larger than current estimates, and most of it resides in bodies larger than about a micron.
  • The fraction of dark matter that is non-baryonic would shrink correspondingly, potentially easing the need for exotic dark matter candidates in galaxy-scale dynamics.
  • The observed submillimeter and millimeter excess in low-metallicity galaxies would be explained by emission from large, cold, nearly blackbody grains rather than by modified grain properties or unusual gas conditions.
  • Galaxy rotation curves and mass models would need to include a substantial baryonic component distributed in the disk, changing the inferred halo properties and mass-to-light ratios.
  • Dust-to-gas mass ratios in galaxies would be systematically underestimated by current methods, affecting the interpretation of metallicity trends and star formation efficiency in the interstellar medium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the CB model's mass normalization is right, the total baryonic mass in galaxy disks could be large enough to account for a significant part of the 'missing mass' without invoking non-baryonic dark matter, a possibility the paper suggests but does not develop into a full dynamical model.
  • The model implicitly predicts that interstellar objects in the 1 m to 1000 m size range should be detectably abundant; future surveys such as LSST or dedicated occultation monitors could count these objects and directly test the number densities the CB model requires.
  • The paper's argument also implies that dust emission-based mass estimates in high-redshift galaxies may be biased low by more than an order of magnitude, which would affect the inferred dust content of galaxies at cosmic dawn, though the paper does not discuss high-redshift evolution.
  • A natural extension would be to compute the gravitational lensing optical depth of the large-body population; if such bodies fill a substantial fraction of the dark matter, their microlensing signal toward the Galactic bulge and Magellanic Clouds should be observable, providing an independent test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that standard interstellar dust models (MRN/WD01) severely underestimate the baryonic dark matter content of galaxies because they ignore grains and bodies larger than about 1 micron. The author proposes a 'Cold-Body' (CB) model that extends the power-law size distribution dN ~ a^-gamma da from 5e-9 m to 5e8 m, with gamma ~ 3.66-3.75 chosen so that the integrated dust mass equals the assumed dark matter mass of the Milky Way (Section 4, Eqs. 5-8; Table 1). The paper then claims consistency with the observed far-infrared/submillimetre excess (Section 5), with measured asteroid, comet, and exoplanet size distributions (Section 6.3), and with the inferred number density of 'Oumuamua-like interstellar objects (Section 6.4), and concludes that dust-type baryonic dark matter may be one to two orders of magnitude more abundant than previously assumed. The paper contains no new observational data, no independent mass normalization, and no quantitative treatment of gravitational microlensing constraints.

Significance. If the central claim were established, it would have major implications for galactic mass budgets, gravitational lensing, and cosmological baryon fractions, so the question is worth addressing. The paper usefully compiles measured power-law size indices from a wide range of Solar System and exoplanetary populations, and it correctly notes that the submillimetre excess is a long-standing challenge for standard dust models. However, the load-bearing mass result is circular: the parameter gamma is solved from the condition that the total CB dust mass equals an assumed dark matter mass, so the order-of-magnitude enhancement is an input rather than a prediction. The independent checks are not mass-determining: the 'Oumuamua density anchors only a narrow size bin, and the submillimetre excess constrains emissivity slopes, not integrated mass. The complete omission of microlensing limits on the massive end of the proposed population is a further decisive gap. The paper therefore does not provide a credible estimate of the total baryonic dark matter mass. It also reports no code, data, or machine-checked derivations; the main quantitative steps are simple algebraic normalizations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (5)-(8)] The total dust mass is imposed, not predicted. The text states that the size index gamma is determined so that 'the total dust mass equals the mass of dark matter estimated for our Galaxy.' Because gamma < 4, the mass integral is dominated by the largest particles, so the normalization effectively places a mass close to M_DM in bodies near a_max = 5e8 m. The order-of-magnitude enhancement claimed in the abstract is therefore a direct consequence of the chosen constraint, not a derived result. An independent normalization—for example, from interstellar dust fluxes, extinction, or grain formation rates—is required before the claim can be evaluated. As written, the model exhibits exactly the circularity the paper criticizes in Section 7.
  2. [Sec. 4 and Sec. 8] No microlensing constraints are discussed anywhere in the manuscript. For a density of 2500 kg m^-3, bodies with radii between roughly 1e7 m and 5e8 m have masses between about 5e-7 and 0.65 M_sun, the range probed by the MACHO, EROS-2, and OGLE surveys. Since gamma < 4 concentrates most of the CB mass in the largest bodies, the model predicts a large population of compact objects that should be constrained by those surveys. The manuscript should quantify the expected microlensing optical depth for its proposed disk/halo distribution and show consistency with the published limits; the current omission leaves the central claim unchecked against an external test.
  3. [Sec. 6.4] The claimed agreement with the 'Oumuamua number density is not a mass anchor. The observed value n_obs ~ 2e15 pc^-3 is derived from a single object and is sensitive to the assumed Galactic volume and detection efficiency; the theoretical value n_theor is computed at the ~100 m size bin, not over the mass-dominating large sizes. Because the total mass is controlled by bodies far larger than 100 m, agreement at the 100 m bin does not constrain the integrated mass. The statement that the 'Oumuamua observation provides 'key observational support' for the existence of large amounts of baryonic dark matter is therefore much stronger than the evidence supports.
  4. [Sec. 5 and Table 1] The submillimetre excess does not determine the integrated mass. Table 1 and Figure 3 compare extinction ratios (kappa_1.1/kappa_300, beta_300, beta_850), which are sensitive to the size distribution over a restricted size range and to assumed grain optical properties. Section 5 itself lists several alternative explanations for the excess (amorphous carbon grains, spinning dust, CMB anomalies), and the paper does not demonstrate that the CB model is uniquely or even quantitatively preferred. A factor-of-ten change in total mass cannot be inferred from agreement of spectral slopes alone.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (2)] There is a typo: 'dN is he number density' should read 'dN is the number density'.
  2. [Sec. 6.3] The text attributes the exoplanet mass-distribution analysis to 'Artemieva et al. [150]', but reference [150] is Ananyeva et al. (2020); the name should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. 4, Fig. 2] Figure 2(d) shows a cumulative mass upper limit of 10^12 M_sun, but the value of the Galactic dark matter mass used to normalize the CB models is not stated explicitly in the text or caption; please specify it.
  4. [Sec. 6.4] The assumed Galaxy volume (cylinder with radius 26 kpc and width 1.2 kpc) is used without justification, and the dependence of n_theor on the chosen a_max and gamma is not shown; this weakens the claimed agreement with the observed value.
  5. [Sec. 7] The sentence claiming that current dust models 'limit the estimated dust mass in galaxies to align with Big Bang theory and the Lambda-CDM model' is a strong assertion that lacks a supporting citation or quantitative argument; it should be substantiated or removed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The order-of-magnitude dust mass is imposed by normalizing the size distribution to the Galactic dark matter mass in Sec. 4, so the headline 'prediction' is the input.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, Eq. (5) and Table 1]
    "The uniform size index gamma in Equation (5) can then be determined by satisfying two conditions: (1) the dust mass for grains with sizes 0.005um < a < 1um matches the dust mass predicted by the MRN model, and (2) the total dust mass equals the mass of dark matter estimated for our Galaxy (Figure 2, blue solid lines)."

    The central claim is that dust-type baryonic dark matter may exceed previous estimates by an order of magnitude or more, with most mass in large compact bodies. That outcome is not derived from independent data: the free parameter gamma is solved for by requiring the total dust mass to equal the Galactic dark matter mass. Since the target mass is imposed as a normalization condition, the later statement that the CB model contains roughly a dark matter mass of dust is true by construction rather than by prediction. The observed size index gamma near 3.5-3.75 is not an independent test, because gamma is the parameter adjusted to hit the mass target.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, Eqs. (6)-(8), CB-B/C/D variants]
    "In this case, the size index gamma in Equation (7) is calculated for the population of large grains to ensure the dust mass aligns with the estimated mass of dark matter in the Galaxy (Figure 2, blue dashed lines)."

    The same constructive circularity is repeated for the alternative CB-B/C/D models. The large-grain population is assigned a power-law slope gamma that is chosen so that the dust mass equals the estimated dark matter mass. Thus the paper's headline that dust-type baryonic dark matter is comparable to the Galaxy's dark matter mass is an input imposed by the fitting procedure, not a result emerging from observations. The gamma values in Table 1 are therefore consequences of the mass constraint, and any subsequent agreement with observed submm slopes is a consistency check on an assumed population, not evidence that the assumed mass scale was independently measured.

full rationale

The load-bearing circularity is in Section 4. In Eq. (5), the CB model assumes one power-law size distribution from 5e-9 m to 5e8 m, and the size index gamma is determined by two conditions, one of which is that the total dust mass equals the mass of dark matter estimated for our Galaxy. In Eqs. (6)-(8), the large-particle distribution is again normalized so that the dust mass aligns with the Galactic dark matter mass. This means the paper's central quantitative result--that baryonic dust could be an order of magnitude or more abundant than previously assumed and of order the dark matter mass--is imposed by normalization. The derived gamma values in Table 1 are the free parameters that enforce this mass, so the subsequent agreement of gamma with the 3.5-4.0 index measured for solar-system bodies is not an independent test of the mass claim. The Oumuamua number-density comparison and the submm emissivity-slope comparison are external and non-circular checks, and they give the model some consistency, but they do not determine the integrated mass; the integrated mass was fixed by the dark matter constraint. There is no load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem here, so the circularity is not of the self-citation kind. Omitted microlensing constraints would be a correctness risk rather than a circularity issue. Overall, because the headline mass excess is forced by the paper's own normalization condition, the score is 8.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result rests on a small number of fitted parameters and strong extrapolations. The most consequential is gamma, which is adjusted so that the total dust mass equals the dark matter mass of the Galaxy; this is a circular choice. The rest are domain assumptions about the applicability of solar-system size distributions to interstellar space and the invisibility of large bodies.

free parameters (5)
  • size index gamma (CB-A/B/C/D) = 3.75, 3.72, 3.69, 3.66
    Chosen so the integrated dust mass over 5e-9 to 5e8 m equals the assumed dark matter mass of the Galaxy (Sec. 4, Fig. 2).
  • Galactic dark matter mass M_DM = ~1e12 M_sun (upper limit in Fig. 2d)
    Used as the target mass the CB model is forced to match; not independently derived in this paper.
  • upper size limit a_max = 5e8 m
    Ad hoc cutoff for the largest bodies; no physical justification given beyond 'macroscopic bodies' (Eq. 5).
  • particle density rho = 2500 kg/m^3
    Assumed for converting mass to size in Table 2; variations would shift derived indices.
  • transition size for CB-B/C/D large-particle component = 1e-6 m
    Chosen to reduce number density of 1-100 um grains; no observational anchor cited (Eq. 7).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Power-law size distribution holds over 17 orders of magnitude (5e-9 to 5e8 m).
    Eq. 5 and Fig. 2: the paper assumes no break in dN ~ a^-gamma across the entire range, despite known physics of grain growth and destruction.
  • domain assumption Solar System / circumstellar size distributions apply to the interstellar medium.
    Section 6 and Table 2 extrapolate asteroid, meteoroid, and exoplanet size indices to the ISM.
  • domain assumption Large particles decouple from gas and evade extinction/emission diagnostics.
    Section 3.3: used to explain why current dust models don't see this mass; no quantitative coupling calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Oumuamua-like objects form in interstellar space.
    Section 6.4: needed to make the number density of large bodies consistent with the CB model; formation mechanism is not established.
  • domain assumption Stellar and supermassive black holes contribute significantly to baryonic dark matter.
    Section 7: cited from literature without a mass budget calculation for the claimed contribution.
invented entities (1)
  • Cold compact body population in the interstellar medium
    purpose: Provides the mass that makes dust-type baryonic dark matter comparable to dark matter; also proposed to explain submillimeter excess (Sec. 4-5).
    No direct detection of this population at the required density; the Oumuamua detection gives one size bin, and the total mass is assigned by the dark matter constraint, not by observation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of What is the amount of baryonic dark matter in galaxies?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCCUDLL4

@misc{pith2026241117775,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: What is the amount of baryonic dark matter in galaxies?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCCUDLL4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17775}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we re-evaluate the estimates of dust mass in galaxies and demonstrate that current dust models are incomplete and based on a priori assumptions. These models suffer from a circularity problem and account for only a small portion of dust, specifically submicron-sized grains. They overlook larger dust particles and other macroscopic bodies, despite observational evidence supporting their existence. This evidence includes the observed (sub)millimeter excess in dust emission spectra and the power-law size distribution with an index {\gamma} ~ 3.5-4.0, which has been measured for large particles and compact bodies across diverse environments. Examples of these large particles include large dust grains and meteoroids detected by satellites, near-Earth objects colliding with Earth, fragments in the Main Asteroid Belt and the Kuiper Belt, interstellar 'Oumuamua-like objects, and exoplanets. As a result, dust-type baryonic dark matter may be more abundant throughout the galaxy by one order of magnitude or even more than previously assumed, with a significant portion of its mass concentrated in large compact bodies. Additionally, black holes may contribute significantly to the total mass of baryonic dark matter. Consequently, current galaxy models do not provide reliable estimates of baryonic mass in galaxies. Clearly, a substantially larger amount of baryonic dark matter in galaxies would have major implications for theories of galaxy dynamics and evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17775 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The grain-size distribution of the MRN model. The dashed red line represents the power law with a size index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The grain-size distribution and cumulative mass of the CB model are shown for grain size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The extinction law for the standard dust model (red line) and the CB models (blue lines). The red line represents the WD01 dust model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The cumulative mass distribution of interplanetary bodies. The blue line represents the observed mass distribution as reported by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zwicky, Republication of: The redshift of extragalactic neb- ulae, General Relativity and Gravitation 41 (1) (2009) 207– 224

    F. Zwicky, Republication of: The redshift of extragalactic neb- ulae, General Relativity and Gravitation 41 (1) (2009) 207– 224

    2009

  2. [2]

    Zwicky, On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Neb- ulae, Astrophysical Journal 86 (1937) 217

    F. Zwicky, On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Neb- ulae, Astrophysical Journal 86 (1937) 217

    1937

  3. [3]

    V . C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys- ical Journal 159 (1970) 379

    1970

  4. [4]

    V . C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, N. Thonnard, Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., Astro- physical Journal 238 (1980) 471–487

    1980

  5. [5]

    V . C. Rubin, D. Burstein, W. K. Ford, N. Thonnard, Rotation velocities of 16 SA galaxies and a comparison of Sa, SB and SC rotation properties., Astrophysical Journal 289 (1985) 81– 104

    1985

  6. [6]

    T. S. van Albada, J. N. Bahcall, K. Begeman, R. Sancisi, Dis- tribution of dark matter in the spiral galaxy NGC 3198., Astro- physical Journal 295 (1985) 305–313

    1985

  7. [7]

    S. M. Kent, Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies. II. Galaxies with H I Rotation Curves, Astronomical Journal 93 (1987) 816

    1987

  8. [8]

    K. G. Begeman, HI rotation curves of spiral galaxies. I. NGC 3198., Astronomy and Astrophysics 223 (1989) 47–60

    1989

Show all 175 references
  1. [9]

    Persic, P

    M. Persic, P. Salucci, F. Stel, The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies — I. The dark matter connection, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 281 (1) (1996) 27–47

    1996

  2. [10]

    R. H. Sanders, The Published Extended Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies: Confrontation with Modified Dynamics, As- trophysical Journal 473 (1996) 117

    1996

  3. [11]

    Sofue, V

    Y . Sofue, V . Rubin, Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 39 (2001) 137–174

    2001

  4. [12]

    W. J. G. de Blok, A. Bosma, High-resolution rotation curves of low surface brightness galaxies, Astronomy and Astrophysics 385 (2002) 816–846

    2002

  5. [13]

    Dubinski, R

    J. Dubinski, R. G. Carlberg, The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, Astrophysical Journal 378 (1991) 496

    1991

  6. [14]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White, The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, Astrophysical Journal 462 (1996) 563

    1996

  7. [15]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White, A Universal Den- sity Profile from Hierarchical Clustering, Astrophysical Jour- nal 490 (2) (1997) 493–508

    1997

  8. [16]

    S. D. M. White, M. J. Rees, Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and cluster- ing, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 183 (1978) 341–358

    1978

  9. [17]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White, The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter, Astrophysical Journal 292 (1985) 371–394

    1985

  10. [18]

    S. D. M. White, C. S. Frenk, M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, Clusters, Filaments, and V oids in a Universe Dominated by Cold Dark Matter, Astrophysical Journal 313 (1987) 505

    1987

  11. [19]

    S. J. Maddox, G. Efstathiou, W. J. Sutherland, J. Loveday, Galaxy correlations on large scales., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 242 (1990) 43

    1990

  12. [20]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T. Quinn, J. Stadel, P. Tozzi, Dark Matter Substructure within Galactic Halos, Astrophysical Journal 524 (1) (1999) L19–L22

    1999

  13. [21]

    Bergstr ¨om, Non-baryonic dark matter: observational evi- dence and detection methods, Reports on Progress in Physics 63 (5) (2000) 793–841

    L. Bergstr ¨om, Non-baryonic dark matter: observational evi- dence and detection methods, Reports on Progress in Physics 63 (5) (2000) 793–841

    2000

  14. [22]

    Del Popolo, Non-baryonic dark matter in cosmology, in: L

    A. Del Popolo, Non-baryonic dark matter in cosmology, in: L. A. Urena-L ´opez, R. Becerril-B ´arcenas, R. Linares-Romero (Eds.), IX Mexican School on Gravitation and Mathematical Physics: Cosmology for the XXIst Century: Gravitation and Mathematical Physics Division of the Mex...

    2013

  15. [23]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Reviews of Modern Physics 90 (4) (2018) 045002

    2018

  16. [24]

    Kroupa, The Dark Matter Crisis: Falsification of the Current Standard Model of Cosmology, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Australia 29 (2012) 395–433

    P. Kroupa, The Dark Matter Crisis: Falsification of the Current Standard Model of Cosmology, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Australia 29 (2012) 395–433

    2012

  17. [25]

    Kroupa, Galaxies as simple dynamical systems: observa- tional data disfavor dark matter and stochastic star formation, Canadian Journal of Physics 93 (2015) 169–202

    P. Kroupa, Galaxies as simple dynamical systems: observa- tional data disfavor dark matter and stochastic star formation, Canadian Journal of Physics 93 (2015) 169–202

    2015

  18. [26]

    Del Popolo, M

    A. Del Popolo, M. Le Delliou, Small Scale Problems of the ΛCDM Model: A Short Review, Galaxies 5 (1) (2017) 17

    2017

  19. [27]

    Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis., Astrophys- ical Journal 270 (1983) 365–370

    M. Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis., Astrophys- ical Journal 270 (1983) 365–370

    1983

  20. [28]

    Milgrom, Testing MOND over a Wide Acceleration Range in X-Ray Ellipticals, Physical Review Letters 109 (13) (2012) 131101

    M. Milgrom, Testing MOND over a Wide Acceleration Range in X-Ray Ellipticals, Physical Review Letters 109 (13) (2012) 131101

    2012

  21. [29]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Relativistic gravitation theory for the modi- fied Newtonian dynamics paradigm, Physical Review D 70 (8) (2004) 083509

    2004

  22. [30]

    P. D. Mannheim, Making the Case for Conformal Gravity, Foundations of Physics 42 (3) (2012) 388–420

    2012

  23. [31]

    P. D. Mannheim, Is dark matter fact or fantasy? — Clues from the data, International Journal of Modern Physics D 28 (14) (2019) 1944022

    2019

  24. [32]

    Vavryˇcuk, Gravitational orbits in the expanding Universe re- visited, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 10 (2023) 1071743

    V . Vavryˇcuk, Gravitational orbits in the expanding Universe re- visited, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 10 (2023) 1071743

    2023

  25. [33]

    Galliano, S

    F. Galliano, S. C. Madden, A. P. Jones, C. D. Wilson, J. P. Bernard, ISM properties in low-metallicity environments. III. The spectral energy distributions of II Zw 40, He 2-10 and NGC 1140, Astronomy and Astrophysics 434 (3) (2005) 867– 885

    2005

  26. [34]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, 12 M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Ban- day, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoˆıt, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, R. Bhatia, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, J. R. Bond, J. B...

    2011

  27. [35]

    Galametz, S

    M. Galametz, S. C. Madden, F. Galliano, S. Hony, G. J. Bendo, M. Sauvage, Probing the dust properties of galaxies up to sub- millimetre wavelengths. II. Dust-to-gas mass ratio trends with metallicity and the submm excess in dwarf galaxies, Astron- omy and Astrophysics 532 (2011) A56

    2011

  28. [36]

    D. A. Dale, G. Aniano, C. W. Engelbracht, J. L. Hinz, O. Krause, E. J. Montiel, H. Roussel, P. N. Appleton, L. Ar- mus, P. Beir˜ao, A. D. Bolatto, B. R. Brandl, D. Calzetti, A. F. Crocker, K. V . Croxall, B. T. Draine, M. Galametz, K. D. Gor- don, B. A. Groves, C. N. Hao, G. H...

    2012

  29. [37]

    R ´emy-Ruyer, S

    A. R ´emy-Ruyer, S. C. Madden, F. Galliano, S. Hony, M. Sauvage, G. J. Bendo, H. Roussel, M. Pohlen, M. W. L. Smith, M. Galametz, D. Cormier, V . Lebouteiller, R. Wu, M. Baes, M. J. Barlow, M. Boquien, A. Boselli, L. Ciesla, I. De Looze, O. Ł. Karczewski, P. Panuzzo, L. Spinog...

    2013

  30. [38]

    Hermelo, M

    I. Hermelo, M. Rela ˜no, U. Lisenfeld, S. Verley, C. Kramer, T. Ruiz-Lara, M. Boquien, E. M. Xilouris, M. Albrecht, Mil- limeter and submillimeter excess emission in M 33 revealed by Planck and LABOCA, Astronomy and Astrophysics 590 (2016) A56

    2016

  31. [39]

    D. A. Dale, D. O. Cook, H. Roussel, J. A. Turner, L. Armus, A. D. Bolatto, M. Boquien, M. J. I. Brown, D. Calzetti, I. De Looze, M. Galametz, K. D. Gordon, B. A. Groves, T. H. Jar- rett, G. Helou, R. Herrera-Camus, J. L. Hinz, L. K. Hunt, R. C. Kennicutt, E. J. Murphy, A. Rest...

    2017

  32. [40]

    J. A. Turner, D. A. Dale, A. Adamo, D. Calzetti, K. Grasha, E. K. Grebel, K. E. Johnson, J. C. Lee, L. J. Smith, I. Yoon, An ALMA/HST Study of Millimeter Dust Emission and Star Clusters, Astrophysical Journal 884 (2) (2019) 112

    2019

  33. [41]

    Gr ¨un, H

    E. Gr ¨un, H. Kr¨uger, M. Landgraf, Cosmic dust, 2001, pp. 373– 404

    2001

  34. [42]

    Strub, H

    P. Strub, H. Kr ¨uger, V . J. Sterken, Sixteen Years of Ulysses Interstellar Dust Measurements in the Solar System. II. Fluc- tuations in the Dust Flow from the Data, Astrophysical Journal 812 (2) (2015) 140

    2015

  35. [43]

    Ivezi´c, S

    ˇZ. Ivezi´c, S. Tabachnik, R. Rafikov, R. H. Lupton, T. Quinn, M. Hammergren, L. Eyer, J. Chu, J. C. Armstrong, X. Fan, K. Finlator, T. R. Geballe, J. E. Gunn, G. S. Hennessy, G. R. Knapp, S. K. Leggett, J. A. Munn, J. R. Pier, C. M. Rock- osi, D. P. Schneider, M. A. Strauss, ...

    2001

  36. [44]

    Jedicke, J

    R. Jedicke, J. Larsen, T. Spahr, Observational Selection Effects in Asteroid Surveys, 2002, pp. 71–87

    2002

  37. [45]

    W. F. Bottke, D. D. Durda, D. Nesvorn ´y, R. Jedicke, A. Mor- bidelli, D. V okrouhlick´y, H. Levison, The fossilized size distri- bution of the main asteroid belt, Icarus 175 (1) (2005) 111–140

    2005

  38. [46]

    B. J. Gladman, D. R. Davis, C. Neese, R. Jedicke, G. Williams, J. J. Kavelaars, J.-M. Petit, H. Scholl, M. Holman, B. Warring- ton, G. Esquerdo, P. Tricarico, On the asteroid belt’s orbital and size distribution, Icarus 202 (1) (2009) 104–118

    2009

  39. [47]

    J. S. Mathis, W. Rumpl, K. H. Nordsieck, The size distribution of interstellar grains., Astrophysical Journal 217 (1977) 425– 433

    1977

  40. [48]

    B. T. Draine, H. M. Lee, Optical Properties of Interstellar Graphite and Silicate Grains, Astrophysical Journal 285 (1984) 89

    1984

  41. [49]

    S.-H. Kim, P. G. Martin, P. D. Hendry, The Size Distribution of Interstellar Dust Particles as Determined from Extinction, Astrophysical Journal 422 (1994) 164

    1994

  42. [50]

    J. C. Weingartner, B. T. Draine, Dust Grain-Size Distributions and Extinction in the Milky Way, Large Magellanic Cloud, and Small Magellanic Cloud, Astrophysical Journal 548 (2001) 296–309

    2001

  43. [51]

    B. T. Draine, Scattering by Interstellar Dust Grains. II. X-Rays, Astrophysical Journal 598 (2) (2003) 1026–1037

    2003

  44. [52]

    Zubko, E

    V . Zubko, E. Dwek, R. G. Arendt, Interstellar Dust Models 13 Consistent with Extinction, Emission, and Abundance Con- straints, Astrophysical Journals 152 (2) (2004) 211–249

    2004

  45. [53]

    B. T. Draine, Interstellar Dust Grains, Annual Review of As- tronomy and Astrophysics 41 (2003) 241–289

    2003

  46. [54]

    B. T. Draine, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium, 2011

    2011

  47. [55]

    B. T. Draine, E. E. Salpeter, Destruction mechanisms for inter- stellar dust., Astrophysical Journal 231 (1979) 438–455

    1979

  48. [56]

    B. T. Draine, E. E. Salpeter, On the physics of dust grains in hot gas., Astrophysical Journal 231 (1979) 77–94

    1979

  49. [57]

    Dominik, A

    C. Dominik, A. G. G. M. Tielens, The Physics of Dust Coag- ulation and the Structure of Dust Aggregates in Space, Astro- physical Journal 480 (2) (1997) 647–673

    1997

  50. [58]

    Dwek, The Evolution of the Elemental Abundances in the Gas and Dust Phases of the Galaxy, Astrophysical Journal 501 (1998) 643

    E. Dwek, The Evolution of the Elemental Abundances in the Gas and Dust Phases of the Galaxy, Astrophysical Journal 501 (1998) 643

    1998

  51. [59]

    A. P. Jones, A. G. G. M. Tielens, D. J. Hollenbach, Grain Shat- tering in Shocks: The Interstellar Grain Size Distribution, As- trophysical Journal 469 (1996) 740

    1996

  52. [60]

    Hirashita, T.-M

    H. Hirashita, T.-M. Kuo, E ffects of grain size distribution on the interstellar dust mass growth, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (2) (2011) 1340–1353

    2011

  53. [61]

    McKinnon, P

    R. McKinnon, P. Torrey, M. V ogelsberger, Dust formation in Milky Way-like galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 457 (4) (2016) 3775–3800

    2016

  54. [62]

    S. M. Andrews, J. P. Williams, Circumstellar Dust Disks in Taurus-Auriga: The Submillimeter Perspective, Astrophysical Journal 631 (2) (2005) 1134–1160

    2005

  55. [63]

    Rodmann, T

    J. Rodmann, T. Henning, C. J. Chandler, L. G. Mundy, D. J. Wilner, Large dust particles in disks around T Tauri stars, As- tronomy and Astrophysics 446 (1) (2006) 211–221

    2006

  56. [64]

    van der Marel, E

    N. van der Marel, E. F. van Dishoeck, S. Bruderer, T. Birnstiel, P. Pinilla, C. P. Dullemond, T. A. van Kempen, M. Schmalzl, J. M. Brown, G. J. Herczeg, G. S. Mathews, V . Geers, A Major Asymmetric Dust Trap in a Transition Disk, Science 340 (6137) (2013) 1199–1202

    2013

  57. [65]

    Kataoka, S

    A. Kataoka, S. Okuzumi, H. Tanaka, H. Nomura, Opacity of flu ffy dust aggregates, Astronomy and Astrophysics 568 (2014) A42

    2014

  58. [66]

    S. J. Weidenschilling, Initial sizes of planetesimals and accre- tion of the asteroids, Icarus 214 (2) (2011) 671–684

    2011

  59. [67]

    Mainzer, J

    A. Mainzer, J. Bauer, T. Grav, J. Masiero, R. M. Cutri, J. Dai- ley, P. Eisenhardt, R. S. McMillan, E. Wright, R. Walker, R. Jedicke, T. Spahr, D. Tholen, R. Alles, R. Beck, H. Brand enburg, T. Conrow, T. Evans, J. Fowler, T. Jarrett, K. Marsh, F. Masci, H. McCallon, S. Wheelo...

    2011

  60. [68]

    E. F. Tedesco, P. V . Noah, M. Noah, S. D. Price, The Sup- plemental IRAS Minor Planet Survey, Astronomical Journal 123 (2) (2002) 1056–1085

    2002

  61. [69]

    Gaia Collaboration, A. G. A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti, J. H. J. de Bruijne, C. Babusiaux, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones, M. Biermann, D. W. Evans, L. Eyer, F. Jansen, C. Jordi, S. A. Klioner, U. Lammers, L. Lindegren, X. Luri, F. Mignard, C. Panem, D. Pourbaix, S. Randich, P. Sa...

    2018

  62. [70]

    E. L. Wright, Long-wavelength absorption by fractal dust grains, Astrophysical Journal 320 (1987) 818–824. 14

    1987

  63. [71]

    Henning, B

    T. Henning, B. Michel, R. Stognienko, Dust opacities in dense regions, Planetary Space Science 43 (1995) 1333–1343

    1995

  64. [72]

    J. Blum, G. Wurm, The growth mechanisms of macroscopic bodies in protoplanetary disks., Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 46 (2008) 21–56

    2008

  65. [73]

    Chiang, A

    E. Chiang, A. N. Youdin, Forming Planetesimals in Solar and Extrasolar Nebulae, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 (2010) 493–522

    2010

  66. [74]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, D. Alina, M. I. R. Alves, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, D. Arzouma- nian, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barand ela, J. Aumont, C. Bacci- galupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoit-L ´evy, J. P. Bernard, M. B...

    2015

  67. [75]

    J. A. Cardelli, G. C. Clayton, J. S. Mathis, The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction, Astro- physical Journal 345 (1989) 245

    1989

  68. [76]

    E. L. Fitzpatrick, Correcting for the E ffects of Interstellar Ex- tinction, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pa- cific 111 (755) (1999) 63–75

    1999

  69. [77]

    Calzetti, The Dust Opacity of Star-forming Galaxies, Pub- lications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 113 (2001) 1449–1485

    D. Calzetti, The Dust Opacity of Star-forming Galaxies, Pub- lications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 113 (2001) 1449–1485

    2001

  70. [78]

    J. E. Beckman, R. F. Peletier, J. H. Knapen, R. L. M. Cor- radi, L. J. Gentet, Scale Lengths in Disk Surface Brightness as Probes of Dust Extinction in Three Spiral Galaxies: M51, NGC 3631, and NGC 4321, Astrophysical Journal 467 (1996) 175

    1996

  71. [79]

    B. W. Holwerda, R. A. Gonzalez, R. J. Allen, P. C. van der Kruit, The Opacity of Spiral Galaxy Disks. IV . Radial Extinc- tion Profiles from Counts of Distant Galaxies Seen through Foreground Disks, Astronomical Journal 129 (2005) 1396– 1411

    2005

  72. [80]

    B. W. Holwerda, R. A. Gonzalez, R. J. Allen, P. C. van der Kruit, The Opacity of Spiral Galaxy Disks. III. Automating the Synthetic Field Method, Astronomical Journal 129 (2005) 1381–1395

    2005

  73. [81]

    Pettini, L

    M. Pettini, L. J. Smith, R. W. Hunstead, D. L. King, Metal enrichment, dust, and star formation in galaxies at high red- shifts. 3: Zn and CR abundances for 17 damped Lyman-alpha systems, Astrophysical Journal 426 (1994) 79–96

    1994

  74. [82]

    Ledoux, J

    C. Ledoux, J. Bergeron, P. Petitjean, Dust depletion and abun- dance pattern in damped Lyalpha systems: A sample of Mn and Ti abundances at z ¡ 2.2, Astronomy and Astrophysics 385 (2002) 802–815

    2002

  75. [83]

    Watson, L

    D. Watson, L. Christensen, K. K. Knudsen, J. Richard, A. Gal- lazzi, M. J. Michałowski, A dusty, normal galaxy in the epoch of reionization, Nature 519 (2015) 327–330

    2015

  76. [84]

    Laporte, R

    N. Laporte, R. S. Ellis, F. Boone, F. E. Bauer, D. Qu ´enard, G. W. Roberts-Borsani, R. Pell ´o, I. P ´erez-Fournon, A. Stre- blyanska, Dust in the Reionization Era: ALMA Observa- tions of a z =8.38 Gravitationally Lensed Galaxy, Astrophys- ical Journal 837 (2017) L21

    2017

  77. [85]

    A. N. Witt, J. Thronson, Harley A., J. Capuano, John M., Dust and the Transfer of Stellar Radiation within Galaxies, Astro- physical Journal 393 (1992) 611

    1992

  78. [86]

    Silva, G

    L. Silva, G. L. Granato, A. Bressan, L. Danese, Modeling the Effects of Dust on Galactic Spectral Energy Distributions from the Ultraviolet to the Millimeter Band, Astrophysical Journal 509 (1998) 103–117

    1998

  79. [87]

    K. A. Misselt, K. D. Gordon, G. C. Clayton, M. J. Wol ff, The DIRTY Model. II. Self-consistent Treatment of Dust Heating and Emission in a Three-dimensional Radiative Transfer Code, Astrophysical Journal 551 (1) (2001) 277–293

    2001

  80. [88]

    R. J. Tu ffs, C. C. Popescu, H. J. V ¨olk, N. D. Kylafis, M. A. Dopita, Modelling the spectral energy distribution of galaxies. III. Attenuation of stellar light in spiral galaxies, Astronomy and Astrophysics 419 (2004) 821–835

    2004

  81. [89]

    S. F. H ¨onig, T. Beckert, K. Ohnaka, G. Weigelt, Radiative transfer modeling of three-dimensional clumpy AGN tori and its application to NGC 1068, Astronomy and Astrophysics 452 (2) (2006) 459–471

    2006

  82. [90]

    C. C. Popescu, A. Misiriotis, N. D. Kylafis, R. J. Tu ffs, J. Fis- chera, Modelling the spectral energy distribution of galaxies. I. Radiation fields and grain heating in the edge-on spiral NGC 891, Astronomy and Astrophysics 362 (2000) 138–150

    2000

  83. [91]

    C. C. Popescu, R. J. Tu ffs, M. A. Dopita, J. Fischera, N. D. Kylafis, B. F. Madore, Modelling the spectral energy distribu- tion of galaxies. V . The dust and PAH emission SEDs of disk galaxies, Astronomy and Astrophysics 527 (2011) A109

    2011

  84. [92]

    Walcher, B

    J. Walcher, B. Groves, T. Budav ´ari, D. Dale, Fitting the inte- grated spectral energy distributions of galaxies, Astrophysics and Space Science 331 (2011) 1–52

    2011

  85. [93]

    da Cunha, S

    E. da Cunha, S. Charlot, D. Elbaz, A simple model to inter- pret the ultraviolet, optical and infrared emission from galax- ies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 388 (2008) 1595–1617. 15

    2008

  86. [94]

    Calzetti, L

    D. Calzetti, L. Armus, R. C. Bohlin, A. L. Kinney, J. Koorn- neef, T. Storchi-Bergmann, The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies, Astrophysical Journal 533 (2000) 682–695

    2000

  87. [95]

    Galametz, R

    M. Galametz, R. C. Kennicutt, M. Albrecht, G. Aniano, L. Ar- mus, F. Bertoldi, D. Calzetti, A. F. Crocker, K. V . Croxall, D. A. Dale, J. Donovan Meyer, B. T. Draine, C. W. Engel- bracht, J. L. Hinz, H. Roussel, R. A. Skibba, F. S. Tabatabaei, F. Walter, A. Weiss, C. D. Wilson...

    2012

  88. [96]

    B. T. Draine, Scattering by Interstellar Dust Grains. I. Optical and Ultraviolet, Astrophysical Journal 598 (2) (2003) 1017– 1025

    2003

  89. [97]

    A. Li, B. T. Draine, Infrared Emission from Interstellar Dust. II. The Diffuse Interstellar Medium, Astrophysical Journal 554 (2001) 778–802

    2001

  90. [98]

    B. T. Draine, A. Li, Infrared Emission from Interstellar Dust. IV . The Silicate-Graphite-PAH Model in the Post-Spitzer Era, Astrophysical Journal 657 (2) (2007) 810–837

    2007

  91. [99]

    A. K. Inoue, T. Hashimoto, H. Chihara, C. Koike, Radiative equilibrium estimates of dust temperature and mass in high- redshift galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (2) (2020) 1577–1592

    2020

  92. [100]

    R. H. Hildebrand, S. E. Whitcomb, R. Winston, R. F. Stien- ing, D. A. Harper, S. H. Moseley, Submillimeter photometry of extragalactic objects., Astrophysical Journal 216 (1977) 698– 705

    1977

  93. [101]

    R. H. Hildebrand, The determination of cloud masses and dust characteristics from submillimetre thermal emission., Quar- terly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 24 (1983) 267–282

    1983

  94. [102]

    Ossenkopf, T

    V . Ossenkopf, T. Henning, J. S. Mathis, Constraints on cosmic silicates., Astronomy and Astrophysics 261 (1992) 567–578

    1992

  95. [103]

    M. Baes, A. Tr ˇcka, P. Camps, J. Trayford, A. Katsianis, L. Marchetti, T. Theuns, M. Vaccari, B. Vandenbroucke, In- frared luminosity functions and dust mass functions in the EA- GLE simulation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (2) (2020) 2912–2924

    2020

  96. [104]

    Dunne, S

    L. Dunne, S. Eales, M. Edmunds, R. Ivison, P. Alexander, D. L. Clements, The SCUBA Local Universe Galaxy Survey - I. First measurements of the submillimetre luminosity and dust mass functions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 315 (1) (2000) 115–139

    2000

  97. [105]

    R. C. Bohlin, B. D. Savage, J. F. Drake, A survey of interstellar H I from L-alpha absorption measurements. II, Astrophysical Journal 224 (1978) 132–142

    1978

  98. [106]

    B. T. Draine, A. Li, Infrared Emission from Interstellar Dust. IV . The Silicate-Graphite-PAH Model in the Post-Spitzer Era, Astrophysical Journal 657 (2007) 810–837

    2007

  99. [107]

    J. C. Mu ˜noz-Mateos, A. Gil de Paz, S. Boissier, J. Zamorano, D. A. Dale, P. G. P ´erez-Gonz´alez, J. Gallego, B. F. Madore, G. Bendo, M. D. Thornley, B. T. Draine, A. Boselli, V . Buat, D. Calzetti, J. Moustakas, J. Kennicutt, R. C., Radial Distribu- tion of Stars, Gas, and ...

    2009

  100. [108]

    B. T. Draine, G. Aniano, O. Krause, B. Groves, K. Sandstrom, R. Braun, A. Leroy, U. Klaas, H. Linz, H.-W. Rix, E. Schin- nerer, A. Schmiedeke, F. Walter, Andromeda’s Dust, Astro- physical Journal 780 (2) (2014) 172

    2014

  101. [109]

    Aniano, B

    G. Aniano, B. T. Draine, L. K. Hunt, K. Sandstrom, D. Calzetti, R. C. Kennicutt, D. A. Dale, M. Galametz, K. D. Gordon, A. K. Leroy, J. D. T. Smith, H. Roussel, M. Sauvage, F. Walter, L. Ar- mus, A. D. Bolatto, M. Boquien, A. Crocker, I. De Looze, J. Donovan Meyer, G. Helou, J...

    2020

  102. [110]

    Lisenfeld, A

    U. Lisenfeld, A. Ferrara, Dust-to-Gas Ratio and Metal Abun- dance in Dwarf Galaxies, Astrophysical Journal 496 (1) (1998) 145–154

    1998

  103. [111]

    K. M. Sandstrom, A. K. Leroy, F. Walter, A. D. Bolatto, K. V . Croxall, B. T. Draine, C. D. Wilson, M. Wolfire, D. Calzetti, R. C. Kennicutt, G. Aniano, J. Donovan Meyer, A. Usero, F. Bigiel, E. Brinks, W. J. G. de Blok, A. Crocker, D. Dale, C. W. Engelbracht, M. Galametz, B. ...

    2013

  104. [112]

    D. J. Wilner, P. D’Alessio, N. Calvet, M. J. Claussen, L. Hart- mann, Toward Planetesimals in the Disk around TW Hydrae: 3.5 Centimeter Dust Emission, Astrophysical Journal 626 (2) (2005) L109–L112

    2005

  105. [113]

    M. C. Wyatt, Evolution of debris disks., Annual Review of As- tronomy and Astrophysics 46 (2008) 339–383

    2008

  106. [114]

    Birnstiel, M

    T. Birnstiel, M. Fang, A. Johansen, Dust Evolution and the Formation of Planetesimals, Space Science Reviews 205 (1-4) (2016) 41–75

    2016

  107. [115]

    Portegies Zwart, S

    S. Portegies Zwart, S. Torres, I. Pelupessy, J. B ´edorf, M. X. Cai, The origin of interstellar asteroidal objects like 1I /2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (1) (2018) L17–L22

    2018

  108. [116]

    C. J. Manser, B. T. G ¨ansicke, S. Eggl, M. Hollands, P. Izquierdo, D. Koester, J. D. Landstreet, W. Lyra, T. R. Marsh, F. Meru, A. J. Mustill, P. Rodr ´ıguez-Gil, O. Toloza, D. Veras, D. J. Wilson, M. R. Burleigh, M. B. Davies, J. Far- ihi, N. Gentile Fusillo, D. de Martino, ...

    2019

  109. [117]

    A. Do, M. A. Tucker, J. Tonry, Interstellar Interlopers: Number Density and Origin of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects, Astrophysical Journal 855 (1) (2018) L10

    2018

  110. [118]

    A. P. Whitworth, K. A. Marsh, P. J. Cigan, J. J. Dalcanton, M. W. L. Smith, H. L. Gomez, O. Lomax, M. J. Gri ffin, S. A. Eales, The dust in M31, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 489 (4) (2019) 5436–5452

    2019

  111. [119]

    Aghanim, M

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Band ay, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger, C. Burigana, E...

    2016

  112. [120]

    K. D. Gordon, F. Galliano, S. Hony, J. P. Bernard, A. Bo- latto, C. Bot, C. Engelbracht, A. Hughes, F. P. Israel, F. Kem- per, S. Kim, A. Li, S. C. Madden, M. Matsuura, M. Meixner, K. Misselt, K. Okumura, P. Panuzzo, M. Rubio, W. T. Reach, J. Roman-Duval, M. Sauvage, R. Skibba...

    2010

  113. [121]

    F. S. Tabatabaei, J. Braine, E. M. Xilouris, C. Kramer, M. Bo- quien, F. Combes, C. Henkel, M. Relano, S. Verley, P. Gratier, F. Israel, M. C. Wiedner, M. R ¨ollig, K. F. Schuster, P. van der Werf, Variation in the dust emissivity index across M 33 with Herschel and Spitzer (H...

    2014

  114. [122]

    Lisenfeld, F

    U. Lisenfeld, F. P. Israel, J. M. Stil, A. Sievers, (Sub)millimetre emission from from NGC 1569: An abundance of very small grains, Astronomy and Astrophysics 382 (2002) 860–871

    2002

  115. [123]

    Galliano, S

    F. Galliano, S. C. Madden, A. P. Jones, C. D. Wilson, J. P. Bernard, F. Le Peintre, ISM properties in low-metallicity en- vironments. II. The dust spectral energy distribution of NGC 1569, Astronomy and Astrophysics 407 (2003) 159–176

    2003

  116. [124]

    Galametz, S

    M. Galametz, S. Madden, F. Galliano, S. Hony, F. Schuller, A. Beelen, G. Bendo, M. Sauvage, A. Lundgren, N. Bil- lot, Probing the dust properties of galaxies up to submillime- tre wavelengths. I. The spectral energy distribution of dwarf galaxies using LABOCA, Astronomy and As...

    2009

  117. [125]

    Paradis, J

    D. Paradis, J. P. Bernard, C. M ´eny, Dust emissivity variations in the Milky Way, Astronomy and Astrophysics 506 (2) (2009) 745–756

    2009

  118. [126]

    Galliano, S

    F. Galliano, S. Hony, J. P. Bernard, C. Bot, S. C. Madden, J. Roman-Duval, M. Galametz, A. Li, M. Meixner, C. W. En- gelbracht, V . Lebouteiller, K. Misselt, E. Montiel, P. Panuzzo, W. T. Reach, R. Skibba, Non-standard grain properties, dark gas reservoir, and extended submill...

    2011

  119. [127]

    Meixner, F

    M. Meixner, F. Galliano, S. Hony, J. Roman-Duval, T. Ro- bitaille, P. Panuzzo, M. Sauvage, K. Gordon, C. Engelbracht, K. Misselt, K. Okumura, T. Beck, J. P. Bernard, A. Bolatto, C. Bot, M. Boyer, S. Bracker, L. R. Carlson, G. C. Clayton, C. H. R. Chen, E. Churchwell, Y . Fukui...

    2010

  120. [128]

    C. Bot, N. Ysard, D. Paradis, J. P. Bernard, G. Lagache, F. P. Israel, W. F. Wall, Submillimeter to centimeter excess emission from the Magellanic Clouds. II. On the nature of the excess, Astronomy and Astrophysics 523 (2010) A20

    2010

  121. [129]

    Mason, S

    B. Mason, S. Dicker, S. Sadavoy, S. Stanchfield, T. Mroczkowski, C. Romero, R. Friesen, C. Sarazin, J. Sievers, T. Stanke, M. Devlin, Confirmation of Enhanced Long-wavelength Dust Emission in OMC 2 /3, Astrophysical Journal 893 (1) (2020) 13

    2020

  122. [130]

    Gr ¨un, H

    E. Gr ¨un, H. Kr¨uger, R. Srama, The Dawn of Dust Astronomy, Space Science Reviews 215 (7) (2019) 46

    2019

  123. [131]

    Koschny, R

    D. Koschny, R. H. Soja, C. Engrand, G. J. Flynn, J. Lasue, A.-C. Levasseur-Regourd, D. Malaspina, T. Nakamura, A. R. Poppe, V . J. Sterken, J. M. Trigo-Rodr ´ıguez, Interplanetary Dust, Meteoroids, Meteors and Meteorites, Space Science Re- views 215 (4) (2019) 34

    2019

  124. [132]

    Dones, P

    L. Dones, P. R. Weissman, H. F. Levison, M. J. Duncan, Oort Cloud formation and dynamics, 2004, p. 153

    2004

  125. [133]

    Fitzsimmons, C

    A. Fitzsimmons, C. Snodgrass, B. Rozitis, B. Yang, M. Hy- land, T. Seccull, M. T. Bannister, W. C. Fraser, R. Jedicke, P. Lacerda, Spectroscopy and thermal modelling of the first in- terstellar object 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua, Nature Astronomy 2 (2018) 133–137

    2018

  126. [134]

    P. C. Frisch, J. M. Dorschner, J. Geiss, J. M. Greenberg, E. Gr ¨un, M. Landgraf, P. Hoppe, A. P. Jones, W. Kr ¨atschmer, T. J. Linde, G. E. Morfill, W. Reach, J. D. Slavin, J. Svestka, A. N. Witt, G. P. Zank, Dust in the Local Interstellar Wind, Astrophysical Journal 525 (1) ...

    1999

  127. [135]

    Kr ¨uger, E

    H. Kr ¨uger, E. Gr ¨un, Interstellar Dust Inside and Outside the Heliosphere, Space Science Reviews 143 (1-4) (2009) 347– 356

    2009

  128. [136]

    Kr ¨uger, P

    H. Kr ¨uger, P. Strub, E. Gr ¨un, V . J. Sterken, Sixteen Years of Ulysses Interstellar Dust Measurements in the Solar System. I. Mass Distribution and Gas-to-dust Mass Ratio, Astrophysical Journal 812 (2) (2015) 139

    2015

  129. [137]

    Altobelli, S

    N. Altobelli, S. Kempf, H. Kr ¨uger, M. Landgraf, M. Roy, E. Gr ¨un, Interstellar dust flux measurements by the Galileo dust instrument between the orbits of Venus and Mars, Jour- nal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 110 (A7) (2005) A07102

    2005

  130. [138]

    Altobelli, V

    N. Altobelli, V . Dikarev, S. Kempf, R. Srama, S. Helfert, G. Moragas-Klostermeyer, M. Roy, E. Gr ¨un, Cassini/Cosmic Dust Analyzer in situ dust measurements between Jupiter and Saturn, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 112 (A7) (2007) A07105

    2007

  131. [139]

    Merouane, B

    S. Merouane, B. Zaprudin, O. Stenzel, Y . Langevin, N. Alto- belli, V . Della Corte, H. Fischer, M. Fulle, K. Hornung, J. Sil´en, N. Ligier, A. Rotundi, J. Ryno, R. Schulz, M. Hilchenbach, J. Kissel, Cosima Team, Dust particle flux and size distribution in the coma of 67P/Chur...

    2016

  132. [140]

    S. G. Love, D. E. Brownlee, A Direct Measurement of the Terrestrial Mass Accretion Rate of Cosmic Dust, Science 17 262 (5133) (1993) 550–553

    1993

  133. [141]

    D. P. Galligan, W. J. Baggaley, The orbital distribution of radar- detected meteoroids of the Solar system dust cloud, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 353 (2) (2004) 422–446

    2004

  134. [142]

    Pokorn ´y, P

    P. Pokorn ´y, P. G. Brown, A reproducible method to determine the meteoroid mass index, Astronomy and Astrophysics 592 (2016) A150

    2016

  135. [143]

    Jewitt, M

    D. Jewitt, M. Ishiguro, H. Weaver, J. Agarwal, M. Mutchler, S. Larson, Hubble Space Telescope Investigation of Main-belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro, Astronomical Journal 147 (5) (2014) 117

    2014

  136. [144]

    Brown, R

    P. Brown, R. E. Spalding, D. O. ReVelle, E. Tagliaferri, S. P. Worden, The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth, Nature 420 (6913) (2002) 294–296

    2002

  137. [145]

    D. O. Revelle, Global infrasonic monitoring of large bolides, in: B. Warmbein (Ed.), Meteoroids 2001 Conference, V ol. 495 of ESA Special Publication, 2001, pp. 483–489

    2001

  138. [146]

    S. C. Werner, A. W. Harris, G. Neukum, B. A. Ivanov, NOTE: The Near-Earth Asteroid Size-Frequency Distribution: A Snapshot of the Lunar Impactor Size-Frequency Distribu- tion, Icarus 156 (1) (2002) 287–290

    2002

  139. [147]

    Rabinowitz, E

    D. Rabinowitz, E. Helin, K. Lawrence, S. Pravdo, A reduced estimate of the number of kilometre-sized near-Earth asteroids, Nature 403 (6766) (2000) 165–166

    2000

  140. [148]

    P. A. Bland, N. A. Artemieva, The rate of small impacts on Earth, Meteoritics and Planetary Science 41 (4) (2006) 607– 631

    2006

  141. [149]

    Halliday, A

    I. Halliday, A. T. Blackwell, A. A. Gri ffin, The Flux of Mete- orites on the Earth’s Surface, Meteoritics 24 (3) (1989) 173

    1989

  142. [150]

    V . I. Ananyeva, A. E. Ivanova, A. A. Venkstern, I. A. Shashkova, A. V . Yudaev, A. V . Tavrov, O. I. Korablev, J.- L. Bertaux, Mass distribution of exoplanets considering some observation selection effects in the transit detection technique, Icarus 346 (2020) 113773

    2020

  143. [151]

    Ceplecha, J

    Z. Ceplecha, J. Borovi ˇcka, W. G. Elford, D. O. Revelle, R. L. Hawkes, V . Porubˇcan, M. ˇSimek, Meteor Phenomena and Bod- ies, Space Science Reviews 84 (1998) 327–471

    1998

  144. [152]

    K. J. Meech, R. Weryk, M. Micheli, J. T. Kleyna, O. R. Hain- aut, R. Jedicke, R. J. Wainscoat, K. C. Chambers, J. V . Keane, A. Petric, L. Denneau, E. Magnier, T. Berger, M. E. Huber, H. Flewelling, C. Waters, E. Schunova-Lilly, S. Chastel, A brief visit from a red and extreme...

    2017

  145. [153]

    B. T. Bolin, H. A. Weaver, Y . R. Fernandez, C. M. Lisse, D. Huppenkothen, R. L. Jones, M. Juri ´c, J. Moeyens, C. A. Schambeau, C. T. Slater, ˇZ. Ivezi´c, A. J. Connolly, APO Time- resolved Color Photometry of Highly Elongated Interstellar Object 1I/‘Oumuamua, Astrophysical J...

    2018

  146. [154]

    D. E. Trilling, M. Mommert, J. L. Hora, D. Farnocchia, P. Chodas, J. Giorgini, H. A. Smith, S. Carey, C. M. Lisse, M. Werner, A. McNeill, S. R. Chesley, J. P. Emery, G. Fazio, Y . R. Fernandez, A. Harris, M. Marengo, M. Mueller, A. Roegge, N. Smith, H. A. Weaver, K. Meech, M. ...

    2018

  147. [155]

    H. E. Schlichting, C. I. Fuentes, D. E. Trilling, Initial Plan- etesimal Sizes and the Size Distribution of Small Kuiper Belt Objects, Astronomical Journal 146 (2) (2013) 36

    2013

  148. [156]

    C. I. Fuentes, M. J. Holman, D. E. Trilling, P. Protopa- pas, Trans-Neptunian Objects with Hubble Space Telescope ACS/WFC, Astrophysical Journal 722 (2) (2010) 1290–1302

    2010

  149. [157]

    Freese, Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars, in: E

    K. Freese, Review of Observational Evidence for Dark Matter in the Universe and in upcoming searches for Dark Stars, in: E. P ´econtal, T. Buchert, P. di Stefano, Y . Copin (Eds.), EAS Publications Series, V ol. 36 of EAS Publications Series, 2009, pp. 113–126

    2009

  150. [158]

    Courteau, M

    S. Courteau, M. Cappellari, R. S. de Jong, A. A. Dutton, E. Emsellem, H. Hoekstra, L. V . E. Koopmans, G. A. Mamon, C. Maraston, T. Treu, L. M. Widrow, Galaxy masses, Reviews of Modern Physics 86 (1) (2014) 47–119

    2014

  151. [159]

    Deckers, J

    J. Deckers, J. Teiser, Macroscopic Dust in Protoplanetary Disks—from Growth to Destruction, Astrophysical Journal 796 (2) (2014) 99

    2014

  152. [160]

    Dumke, M

    M. Dumke, M. Krause, R. Wielebinski, Cold dust in a se- lected sample of nearby galaxies. I. The interacting galaxy NGC 4631, Astronomy and Astrophysics 414 (2004) 475–486

    2004

  153. [161]

    G. J. Bendo, B. A. Buckalew, D. A. Dale, B. T. Draine, R. D. Joseph, J. Kennicutt, Robert C., K. Sheth, J.-D. T. Smith, F. Walter, D. Calzetti, J. M. Cannon, C. W. Engelbracht, K. D. Gordon, G. Helou, D. Hollenbach, E. J. Murphy, H. Roussel, Spitzer and JCMT Observations of th...

    2006

  154. [162]

    K. D. Gordon, J. Roman-Duval, C. Bot, M. Meixner, B. Babler, J.-P. Bernard, A. Bolatto, M. L. Boyer, G. C. Clayton, C. En- gelbracht, Y . Fukui, M. Galametz, F. Galliano, S. Hony, A. Hughes, R. Indebetouw, F. P. Israel, K. Jameson, A. Kawa- mura, V . Lebouteiller, A. Li, S. C....

    2014

  155. [163]

    Ferrarese, H

    L. Ferrarese, H. Ford, Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei: Past, Present and Future Research, Space Science Re- views 116 (3-4) (2005) 523–624

    2005

  156. [164]

    V olonteri, The Formation and Evolution of Massive Black Holes, Science 337 (6094) (2012) 544

    M. V olonteri, The Formation and Evolution of Massive Black Holes, Science 337 (6094) (2012) 544

    2012

  157. [165]

    J. E. Greene, J. Strader, L. C. Ho, Intermediate-Mass Black Holes, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 58 (2020) 257–312

    2020

  158. [166]

    M. C. Miller, E. J. M. Colbert, Intermediate-Mass Black Holes, International Journal of Modern Physics D 13 (1) (2004) 1–64

    2004

  159. [167]

    Kormendy, L

    J. Kormendy, L. C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 51 (1) (2013) 511–653

    2013

  160. [168]

    Tsuna, N

    D. Tsuna, N. Kawanaka, Radio emission from accreting iso- lated black holes in our galaxy, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) (2019) 2099–2107

    2019

  161. [169]

    Sch ¨odel, T

    R. Sch ¨odel, T. Ott, R. Genzel, R. Hofmann, M. Lehnert, A. Eckart, N. Mouawad, T. Alexander, M. J. Reid, R. Lenzen, M. Hartung, F. Lacombe, D. Rouan, E. Gendron, G. Rous- set, A. M. Lagrange, W. Brandner, N. Ageorges, C. Lidman, A. F. M. Moorwood, J. Spyromilio, N. Hubin, K. ...

    2002

  162. [170]

    A. M. Ghez, S. Salim, S. D. Hornstein, A. Tanner, J. R. Lu, M. Morris, E. E. Becklin, G. Duch ˆene, Stellar Orbits around the Galactic Center Black Hole, Astrophysical Journal 620 (2) (2005) 744–757

    2005

  163. [171]

    Gebhardt, J

    K. Gebhardt, J. Adams, D. Richstone, T. R. Lauer, S. M. Faber, K. G¨ultekin, J. Murphy, S. Tremaine, The Black Hole Mass in M87 from Gemini/NIFS Adaptive Optics Observations, Astro- physical Journal 729 (2) (2011) 119

    2011

  164. [172]

    Ba ˜nados, B

    E. Ba ˜nados, B. P. Venemans, C. Mazzucchelli, E. P. Farina, 18 F. Walter, F. Wang, R. Decarli, D. Stern, X. Fan, F. B. Davies, J. F. Hennawi, R. A. Simcoe, M. L. Turner, H.-W. Rix, J. Yang, D. D. Kelson, G. C. Rudie, J. M. Winters, An 800-million- solar-mass black hole in a s...

    2018

  165. [173]

    A. D. Dolgov, Massive and supermassive black holes in the contemporary and early Universe and problems in cosmology and astrophysics, Physics Uspekhi 61 (2) (2018) 115

    2018

  166. [174]

    R. L. Larson, S. L. Finkelstein, D. D. Kocevski, T. A. Hutchi- son, J. R. Trump, P. Arrabal Haro, V . Bromm, N. J. Cleri, M. Dickinson, S. Fujimoto, J. S. Kartaltepe, A. M. Koeke- moer, C. Papovich, N. Pirzkal, S. Tacchella, J. A. Zavala, M. Bagley, P. Behroozi, J. B. Champagn...

    2023

  167. [175]

    A. D. Goulding, J. E. Greene, D. J. Setton, I. Labbe, R. Bezanson, T. B. Miller, H. Atek, ´A. Bogd ´an, G. Bram- mer, I. Chemerynska, S. E. Cutler, P. Dayal, Y . Fudamoto, S. Fujimoto, L. J. Furtak, V . Kokorev, G. Khullar, J. Leja, D. Marchesini, P. Natarajan, E. Nelson, P. A...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.