Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Metastability in Coexisting Competing Orders

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An ultrafast laser that suppresses the weaker of two competing orders can trap the stronger order in a long-lived enhanced metastable state with a calculable lifetime.

desk verdict Useful extension of Sun-Millis, but the claimed match to YBCO correlation-length enhancement contradicts the model's own fluctuation equations. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17871 v1 pith:PBQM6KRK submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.str-el

Yasamin Masoumi Sefidkhani , Alberto de la Torre , Gregory A. Fiete This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.45.Lr74.25.-q64.60.-i05.70.Ln
keywords dynamicalphasetransitiontime-dependentGinzburg-Landaumetastabilitycompetingorderschargedensitywavesuperconductivityultrafastlaserpumpcross-correlation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that when two competing orders coexist, like superconductivity and charge-density waves in a cuprate, an ultrafast laser pulse that selectively suppresses the weaker order can drive the stronger one into an enhanced, long-lived metastable state. Using time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory with thermal and nonthermal fluctuations, the authors derive a formula for how long that trapped state survives. They show that including the previously neglected cross-correlation between the two orders shortens the trapping time and limits how much the correlation length grows. Applied to pump-probe experiments on YBCO, the model reproduces the measured roughly 120% enhancement of the CDW amplitude and roughly 70% growth of its correlation length, offering a generic explanation for transient order enhancement in materials with competing orders.

What carries the argument

The central object is a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) free energy functional for two complex scalar order parameters, $\psi_1$ (the primary order, e.g., CDW) and $\psi_2$ (the secondary order, e.g., SC), coupled by a bilinear competition term $c|\psi_1|^2|\psi_2|^2$. The laser enters only through a time-dependent mass term $\alpha_2(t)$ for the secondary order, switching it from negative to positive during the pump and then letting it relax. Dynamics obey Model-A Langevin equations with Gaussian noise fulfilling the fluctuation-dissipation theorem; the argument is carried by the coupled mean-field equations and by correlation functions $C^{ij}_q$, especially the cross-correlation $C^{ij}_q$ which the paper includes for the first time and which reduces the metastability lifetime. The lifetime formula (Eq. 13) is derived by matching the early pump-on exponential decay (Eq. 9) to the pump-off Bernoulli solution (Eqs. 11-12), with the trapping end defined by $\psi_2$ recovering to the equilibrium value of $\psi_1$.

What would settle it

Measure, in a pump-probe experiment on a YBCO-like material, the CDW amplitude and correlation length while tuning the pump photon energy or polarization so that the pulse couples equally to both orders rather than preferentially to the SC mass term; the predicted roughly 120% CDW enhancement should disappear or reverse. Alternatively, check the predicted scaling of the trapping time $t_r - t_p$ in Eq. (13) against measured recovery times across a range of pump intensities; if the recovery time does not follow the logarithmic-in-intensity dependence, the mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the existence of 'dynamical trapping': after a strong ultrafast quench that drives the mass term of the secondary order positive, the secondary order is suppressed and the primary order grows beyond its equilibrium value, with the system resting in a local minimum of the free energy functional for a time $t_r - t_p$ that is set by the competition strength, relaxation rates, and the pump parameters. The paper provides an implicit analytical expression for this metastability lifetime, Eq. (13), and shows numerically that fluctuations, both from the thermal bath and from the time dependence of the free energy, modify the lifetime because the positive autocorrelations $C^{ii}_k$ slow the revival of the suppressed order, while the negative cross-correlation $C^{ij}_k$ speeds it up. The model reproduces quantitative features of ultrafast experiments on YBCO, in particular a roughly 120% increase in the mean-field CDW amplitude and a roughly 70% increase in its correlation length, with the SC order suppressed by more than 90%.

Load-bearing premise

The whole mechanism assumes the ultrafast pump changes only the mass term $\alpha_2(t)$ of the secondary order, leaving the primary order's mass term, gradient coefficients, and the competition coupling at their equilibrium values; if the pump also acts on those, the selective suppression and subsequent enhancement could weaken or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any material with two weakly competing orders, a pump tuned to the lower-temperature order should transiently amplify the higher-temperature order beyond its equilibrium value.
  • The metastability lifetime can be estimated with Eq. (13) from measurable relaxation rates, stiffnesses, and the competition coefficient, offering a quantitative pre-pump prediction for pump-probe experiments.
  • Because the cross-correlation between orders shortens the lifetime, experiments that measure correlation-length dynamics can infer the sign and magnitude of the inter-order coupling.
  • The mechanism does not require fine-tuning the pump; any strong pulse that flips the secondary mass term's sign should trigger the same trapping.
  • The formalism extends beyond condensed matter, including cosmological Kibble-Zurek out-of-equilibrium dynamics, wherever two competing fields relax through a bath.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the selective-coupling assumption is right, varying the pump polarization or photon energy to couple to the primary order instead should invert the effect, enhance the SC and suppress CDW, which would be a testable symmetry of the model.
  • The model's neglect of spatial phase gradients in the order parameters may matter for materials with incommensurate CDWs; including phase fluctuations could alter the correlation-length growth and is a natural next step.
  • The analytical lifetime formula suggests a general scaling relation between trapping time and the ratio of the secondary order's mass and quartic terms; materials with stiffer secondary orders should trap longer, which could be checked across cuprate families.
  • Since the cross-correlation $C^{ij}_q$ is purely nonthermal, its effect could be isolated experimentally by comparing trapping times at the same effective temperature but different pump fluences, providing a clean probe of nonthermal fluctuation physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies two coexisting, weakly competing scalar order parameters in a 2D time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory. It considers an ultrafast laser pulse that transiently changes the mass term of the weaker order parameter, shows that a metastable state can emerge in which the initially weaker order is suppressed and the stronger order is transiently enhanced, and derives an approximate analytical expression for the metastability lifetime. Including Gaussian fluctuations and cross-correlations, the authors claim the model reproduces experimental observations in YBCO, specifically a 120% increase in the CDW mean-field amplitude and a 70% increase in the CDW correlation length. The general dynamical-trapping mechanism is interesting, but the quantitative comparison to experiment contains a serious internal inconsistency that needs to be resolved.

Significance. If the dynamical-trapping mechanism is correct, the paper would provide a useful general framework for pump-probe experiments on systems with competing orders, and the inclusion of cross-correlations between two order parameters goes beyond several earlier treatments. The analytical formulas for the metastability lifetime, Eqs. (11)-(13), are a useful addition, and the numerical simulations in Figs. 2-3 illustrate the proposed phenomenology. However, the paper's central quantitative claim regarding the YBCO experiment is load-bearing: the authors use it to argue that their model 'explains' previously unresolved data. That claim is undermined by the internal inconsistency between the predicted amplitude increase and the predicted correlation-length increase, as detailed below. The paper has no accompanying code or data release, and the parameter choices for the experimental comparison are not derived from a material-specific model.

major comments (3)
  1. [§Experiments and Fig. 4; Eqs. (5)-(8)] The simultaneous 120% amplitude increase and 70% correlation-length increase shown in Fig. 4 cannot both follow from the model as written. From Eq. (7), the diagonal static correlation function in the Gaussian approximation is C_11(q) ~ T_v/[r_1 + 8u_1 \bar\psi_1^2 + b_1 q^2], so the CDW correlation length is \xi_1^2 = b_1/(r_1 + 8u_1 \bar\psi_1^2). At any mean-field extremum one has r_1 = 0. Using the Fig. 4 parameters, the coexisting equilibrium has \bar\psi_1^2 = (\alpha_2 c - 2u_2\alpha_1)/(2c^2 - 8u_1 u_2) = 0.0304, giving \xi_1^2 = 7/(16 \times 0.0304) = 14.4. When the SC order is fully suppressed, the CDW-only state has \bar\psi_1^2 = \alpha_1/(4u_1) = 0.125, giving \xi_1^2 = 7/(16 \times 0.125) = 3.5. Thus \xi_1 is predicted to decrease by roughly 50%, not increase by 70%. Including the cross-correlation term of Eq. (8) does not repair the contradiction because that term vanishes in the SC-suppressed state with \bar\psi_2 \approx 0. The authors need to reconcile Fig. 4a with Fig. 4b, for example by defining \xi_1 explicitly and specifying the exact time window, or by removing the claim that the model reproduces the enhanced correlation length.
  2. [§Model, Eq. (3); §Experiments, Fig. 4] The quantitative agreement with YBCO is obtained by manually choosing the free parameters in Fig. 4 (α1=1.0, α2=1.1, α'_2=3.5, b1=7.0, b2=2.0, u1=2.0, u2=1.0, c=1.5, Γ1=2.5 ps^-1, Γ2=1.0 ps^-1, e^2 I_0^2=1.0, T_v=0.07, t_c=1.0 ps). The paper provides no material-specific derivation or sensitivity analysis for these values, and the central assumption that the laser changes only α_2(t), leaving α_1(t), b_i, u_i, and c unchanged, is not microscopically justified. As a result the 120% and 70% numbers are a fit obtained by parameter selection rather than a parameter-free prediction. The authors should either derive the parameters from a microscopic model of YBCO or demonstrate that the qualitative and quantitative results are robust over a broad parameter range.
  3. [SM III.C; Eq. (13)] The analytical metastability-lifetime expression, Eq. (13), is derived by neglecting \bar\psi_2 in the equation for \bar\psi_1 and by approximating \bar\psi_2 as small. The Supplementary Material acknowledges that these approximations are accurate only in the large-u_1 limit, but the parameters used in the main figures (e.g., u_1 = 2.0, c = 1.5) do not obviously satisfy that condition. No error estimate is given for the lifetime formula against the full numerical solution over the parameter range used. Since the lifetime formula is a central advertised result, the authors should benchmark Eq. (13) more carefully and state its regime of quantitative validity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§Metastability and Fluctuations; §Experiments] The correlation length \xi_i is used throughout the paper, but its definition is never given in the main text; it should be defined explicitly in terms of the q-dependence of C_ii(q), since that is the quantity plotted in Fig. 4b.
  2. [§Model, after Eq. (2)] In the sentence 'we take the mass term, \psi_2^i, to have a temporal dependence', the symbol should be \alpha_2(t), not \psi_2^i; this typo makes the passage confusing.
  3. [§Summary] The phrase 'estimating the the metastability lifetime' contains a duplicated article and should read 'estimating the metastability lifetime'.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The figure captions switch between the notation αCDW/αSC and α1/α2; please use consistent notation throughout the text and figures.
  5. [§Acknowledgments] 'We acknowledges funding' should be corrected to 'We acknowledge funding'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central mean-field and fluctuation dynamics follow from the stated TDGL equations, and the quantitative experimental comparison is illustrative rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is self-contained: it writes a two-order-parameter free energy (Eq. 2), assumes a selective laser-driven mass term for the secondary order (Eq. 3), and then solves the resulting TDGL equations (Eqs. 5-13). The appearance of dynamical trapping and the metastable-lifetime formula are algebraic consequences of those stated assumptions, not re-statements of the experimental numbers. No parameter is explicitly fitted to the 120% amplitude or 70% correlation-length data, and the quoted results are outputs of the chosen dimensionless parameters in Fig. 4. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [9,14]) are contextual references to prior nonthermal-control work and do not carry a load-bearing premise, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz. A separate concern is that the claimed 70% correlation-length increase appears difficult to reconcile with the paper's own Gaussian correlation formula (Eq. 7) when the CDW amplitude grows, but that is a correctness/validation issue, not a circularity of the derivation. The central mechanism is therefore not circular, even though the quantitative agreement with YBCO is not independently constrained.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central trapping mechanism is built on a generic Landau framework with hand-picked coefficients; no new microscopic entities are introduced.

free parameters (13)
  • alpha_1 (CDW mass coefficient) = 1.0
    Chosen to set the equilibrium CDW amplitude in Figs 2 and 4.
  • alpha_2 (SC mass coefficient) = 1.1
    Chosen so the SC equilibrium amplitude exceeds the CDW amplitude.
  • alpha'_2 (pump-induced mass) = 3.5
    Strength of the quench; chosen to strongly suppress SC during the pump.
  • b_1 (CDW gradient coefficient) = 7.0
    Controls CDW correlation length dynamics; chosen to produce the 70% correlation length increase.
  • b_2 (SC gradient coefficient) = 2.0
    Controls SC correlation length; chosen alongside b_1.
  • u_1 (CDW quartic coefficient) = 2.0
    Sets the CDW equilibrium value and nonlinearity.
  • u_2 (SC quartic coefficient) = 1.0
    Sets the SC equilibrium value and nonlinearity.
  • c (competition coupling) = 1.5
    Must satisfy 0 < c < 2*sqrt(u1*u2) to allow coexistence; chosen to yield weak competition.
  • Gamma_1 (CDW relaxation rate) = 2.5 ps^-1
    Sets the timescale of CDW recovery.
  • Gamma_2 (SC relaxation rate) = 1.0 ps^-1 (Fig 4), 1.5 ps^-1 (Fig 2)
    Sets the timescale of SC suppression and revival.
  • I_0 (laser intensity parameter) = e^2 I0^2 = 1.0
    Overall pump strength; chosen to yield the desired suppression depth.
  • T_v (normalized bath temperature) = 0.07
    Temperature entering fluctuation-dissipation relation; chosen to keep fluctuations moderate.
  • t_c (mass relaxation time of pump-induced change) = 1.0 ps (Fig 4), 2.0 ps (Fig 2)
    Controls how fast alpha_2(t) returns to equilibrium after the pump.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Model A relaxational dynamics (Hohenberg-Halperin) with white noise satisfying the fluctuation-dissipation theorem
    The basis for the TDGL equations (Eq 1), a standard but non-microscopic starting point.
  • domain assumption Gaussian fluctuations small compared to mean-field values (Ginzburg criterion), allowing Wick's theorem and a truncated expansion
    Used to derive the correlation dynamics (Eqs 7-8).
  • ad hoc to paper The laser only modifies the mass term alpha_2(t) of the secondary order parameter; alpha_1(t) and all other coefficients are unchanged
    Central to the selective suppression mechanism; no microscopic justification is given.
  • domain assumption Order parameter phases are spatially uniform and set to zero, so only amplitude dynamics are considered
    Simplifies the problem; ignores phase fluctuations and topological defects.
  • domain assumption The system is in thermal equilibrium at t<0 and the bath temperature T_v is constant throughout the pump-probe cycle
    Underlies the initial conditions and the fluctuation-dissipation balance.
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional spatial domain with a UV cutoff Lambda
    The model is formulated in d=2 and requires a cutoff for the correlation integrals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metastability in Coexisting Competing Orders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PBQM6KRK

@misc{pith2026241117871,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metastability in Coexisting Competing Orders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PBQM6KRK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17871}
}
read the original abstract

The dynamical phase transition of a system with two coexisting competing order parameters is studied using the time-dependent-Ginzburg-Landau framework. The dynamics are induced by parameters capturing the physics of driving the system with an ultrafast laser pulse. A remarkable enhancement of the order parameter with a smaller mean-field value following the pump and the emergence of an induced metastable state is investigated through analytical and numerical studies. The effect of order parameter fluctuations on the exploration of the nonequilibrium free energy landscape reveals important information about the impact of both thermal and nonthermal fluctuations on the dynamics of the metastable state. Our results provide an interpretation of previously unexplained ultrafast experiments on superconductors with competing charge density wave order. Our formalism is relevant across broad classes of out-of-equilibrium systems beyond the condensed matter context, such as the Kibble-Zurek cosmological model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17871 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonthermal order by disorder

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Anisotropic, nonthermal fluctuations can transiently stabilize order parameter configurations that are not minima of the equilibrium free energy, through mutual feedback between order and fluctuations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [54]

    Tsuji, M

    N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Nonthermal anti- ferromagnetic order and nonequilibrium criticality in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 136404 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  3. [2]

    In contrast, all terms except the quartic term in the energy functional are included for the secondary OP

    is ignored for the first OP. In contrast, all terms except the quartic term in the energy functional are included for the secondary OP. This leads to ¯ψ1(t) = vuut αeq 1 4u1 − (4u1 − αeq 1 ¯ψ2 1,p )e−2Γ1αeq 1 (t−tp) , (11) ¯ψ2(t) = ¯ψ2,peΦ(t)   4u1e2Γ1α1(t−tp) − 4u1 ¯ψ2 1,p−α1 ¯ψ2 1,p 4u1 − 4u1 ¯ψ2 1,p−α1 ¯ψ2 1,p   − Γ2 Γ1 · c 4u1 , (12) Φ(t) = Γ2 t...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed in- teracting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011)

    2011

  5. [4]

    Bray, Theory of phase ordering kinetics, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 194, 41 (1993)

    A. Bray, Theory of phase ordering kinetics, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 194, 41 (1993)

    work page 1993

  6. [5]

    T. L. Bechhoefer J, L¨ owen H, Dynamical mechanism for the formation of metastable phases, . Phys Rev Lett. 67, 1266 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [6]

    Alert, P

    R. Alert, P. Tierno, and J. Casademunt, Formation of metastable phases by spinodal decomposition, Nat. Com- mun. 7, 1307 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    Ravnik, M

    J. Ravnik, M. Diego, Y. Gerasimenko, et al., A time- domain phase diagram of metastable states in a charge ordered quantum material., Nat. Commun. 12, 2323 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    Macieszczak, D

    K. Macieszczak, D. C. Rose, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Theory of classical metastability in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033047 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    Nicolis and C

    G. Nicolis and C. Nicolis, Kinetics of phase transitions in the presence of an intermediate metastable state: a generic model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 351, 22 (2005), new Horizons in Stochastic Complexity

    2005

  4. [11]

    Y.-Z. Chou, Y. Liao, and M. S. Foster, Twisting anderson pseudospins with light: Quench dynamics in terahertz- pumped bcs superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95, 104507 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Balzer, F

    K. Balzer, F. A. Wolf, I. P. McCulloch, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, Nonthermal melting of n´ eel order in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031039 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    Baldini, M

    E. Baldini, M. A. Sentef, S. Acharya, T. Brumme, E. Sheveleva, F. Lyzwa, E. Pomjakushina, C. Bernhard, M. van Schilfgaarde, F. Carbone, A. Rubio, and C. We- ber, Electron–phonon-driven three-dimensional metallic- ity in an insulating cuprate, Proceedings of the National Academ...

    2020

  7. [14]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731 (2010)

    2010

  8. [15]

    Claassen, H.-C

    M. Claassen, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Dev- ereaux, Dynamical time-reversal symmetry breaking and photo-induced chiral spin liquids in frustrated mott in- sulators, Nature Communications 8, 1192 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    de la Torre, K

    A. de la Torre, K. L. Seyler, M. Buchhold, Y. Baum, G. Zhang, N. J. Laurita, J. W. Harter, L. Zhao, I. Phin- ney, X. Chen, S. D. Wilson, G. Cao, R. D. Averitt, G. Re- fael, and D. Hsieh, Decoupling of static and dynamic criticality in a driven mott insulator, Communications Ph...

    2022

  10. [17]

    Sokolowski-Tinten and D

    K. Sokolowski-Tinten and D. von der Linde, Ultrafast phase transitions and lattice dynamics probed using laser-produced x-ray pulses, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 16, R1517 (2004)

    2004

  11. [18]

    Claassen, D

    M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, M. Zingl, M. A. Sentef, and A. Rubio, Universal optical control of chiral supercon- ductors and majorana modes, Nature Physics 15, 766 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    Beaud, A

    P. Beaud, A. Caviezel, S. Mariager, L. Rettig, G. Ingold, C. Dornes, S. Huang, J. Johnson, M. Radovic, T. Huber, et al., A time-dependent order parameter for ultrafast photoinduced phase transitions, Nature materials13, 923 (2014)

    2014

  13. [20]

    Tengdin, W

    P. Tengdin, W. You, C. Chen, X. Shi, D. Zusin, Y. Zhang, C. Gentry, A. Blonsky, M. Keller, P. M. Oppeneer, H. C. Kapteyn, Z. Tao, and M. M. Murnane, Critical behavior within 20 fs drives the out-of-equilibrium laser-induced magnetic phase transition in nickel, Science Advances...

    2018

  14. [21]

    Nicoletti, E

    D. Nicoletti, E. Casandruc, Y. Laplace, V. Khanna, C. R. Hunt, S. Kaiser, S. S. Dhesi, G. D. Gu, J. P. Hill, and A. Cavalleri, Optically induced superconductivity in striped La 2−xBaxCuO4 by polarization-selective excita- tion in the near infrared, Phys. Rev. B90, 100503 (2014)

    2014

  15. [22]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, D. van der Marel, M. Dres- sel, and K. Haule, Electrodynamics of correlated electron materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 471 (2011)

    2011

  16. [23]

    S. J. Zhang, Z. X. Wang, L. Y. Shi, T. Lin, M. Y. Zhang, G. D. Gu, T. Dong, and N. L. Wang, Light- induced new collective modes in the superconductor La1.905Ba0.095CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 98, 020506 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    S. J. Zhang, Z. X. Wang, D. Wu, Q. M. Liu, L. Y. Shi, T. Lin, S. L. Li, P. C. Dai, T. Dong, and N. L. Wang, Pho- toinduced metastable state with modulated josephson coupling strengths in Pr 0.88LaCe0.12CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 98, 224507 (2018)

    2018

  18. [25]

    H. Niwa, N. Yoshikawa, K. Tomari, R. Matsunaga, D. Song, H. Eisaki, and R. Shimano, Light-induced nonequilibrium response of the superconducting cuprate La2−xSrxCuO4, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104507 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    Nicoletti, D

    D. Nicoletti, D. Fu, O. Mehio, S. Moore, A. S. Disa, G. D. Gu, and A. Cavalleri, Magnetic-field tuning of light- induced superconductivity in striped La 2−xBaxCuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 267003 (2018)

    2018

  20. [27]

    McMahon, A

    C. McMahon, A. J. Achkar, E. H. da Silva Neto, I. Djianto, J. Menard, F. He, R. Sutarto, R. Comin, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Damascelli, and D. G. Hawthorn, Orbital symmetries of charge den- sity wave order in YBa 2Cu3O6+x, Science Advances 6, eaay0345 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    H. Ning, O. Mehio, M. Buchhold, T. Kurumaji, G. Re- fael, J. G. Checkelsky, and D. Hsieh, Signatures of ul- trafast reversal of excitonic order in ta 2nise5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267602 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    Cyr-Choini` ere, G

    O. Cyr-Choini` ere, G. Grissonnanche, S. Badoux, J. Day, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and L. Taillefer, Two types of nematicity in the phase di- agram of the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3Oy, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224502 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    Jang, W.-S

    H. Jang, W.-S. Lee, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Ya- 6 sumura, L. Nie, A. V. Maharaj, S. Gerber, Y.-J. Liu, A. Mehta, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, C. A. Burns, Z. Islam, S. Song, J. Hastings, T. P. Devereaux, Z.-X. Shen, S. A. Kivelson, C.-C. Kao, D. Zhu, and J.- S. Lee, ...

    2016

  24. [31]

    T. Wu, H. Mayaffre, S. Kr¨ amer, M. Horvati´ c, C. Berthier, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, and M.-H. Julien, Magnetic-field-induced charge-stripe order in the high- temperature superconductor YBa 2Cu3Oy, Nature 477, 191 (2011)

    2011

  25. [32]

    J. Choi, O. Ivashko, E. Blackburn, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, M. H¨ ucker, S. Gerber, O. Gutowski, U. R¨ utt, M. v. Zim- mermann, E. M. Forgan, S. M. Hayden, and J. Chang, Spatially inhomogeneous competition between supercon- ductivity ...

    2020

  26. [33]

    H. Luo, R. Zhang, M. Laver, Z. Yamani, M. Wang, X. Lu, M. Wang, Y. Chen, S. Li, S. Chang, J. W. Lynn, and P. Dai, Coexistence and competition of the short-range incommensurate antiferromagnetic order with the super- conducting state of BaFe 2−xNixAs2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 247...

    2012

  27. [34]

    Ma, Z.-H

    J.-H. Ma, Z.-H. Pan, F. C. Niestemski, M. Neupane, Y.- M. Xu, P. Richard, K. Nakayama, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, H.-Q. Luo, L. Fang, H.-H. Wen, Z. Wang, H. Ding, and V. Madhavan, Coexistence of competing orders with two energy gaps in real and momentum space in the high temperatu...

    2008

  28. [35]

    Q. Xiao, Y. Lin, Q. Li, X. Zheng, S. Francoual, C. Plueck- thun, W. Xia, Q. Qiu, S. Zhang, Y. Guo, J. Feng, and Y. Peng, Coexistence of multiple stacking charge density waves in kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012032 (2023)

    2023

  29. [36]

    Wiesenmayer, H

    E. Wiesenmayer, H. Luetkens, G. Pascua, R. Khasanov, A. Amato, H. Potts, B. Banusch, H.-H. Klauss, and D. Johrendt, Microscopic coexistence of superconductiv- ity and magnetism in Ba 1−xKxFe2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 237001 (2011)

    2011

  30. [37]

    J. Lang, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Field theory for the dynamics of the open O(N ) model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064310 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Zhang, E

    Y. Zhang, E. Demler, and S. Sachdev, Competing orders in a magnetic field: Spin and charge order in the cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 66, 094501 (2002)

    2002

  32. [39]

    Lopes, D

    N. Lopes, D. Reyes, M. A. Continentino, and C. Thomas, Interplay between charge density wave and superconduc- tivity in multiband systems with interband coulomb in- teraction, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195150 (2021)

    2021

  33. [40]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Collo- quium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457 (2015)

    2015

  34. [41]

    Arpaia and G

    R. Arpaia and G. Ghiringhelli, Charge order at high temperature in cuprate superconductors, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 111005 (2021)

    2021

  35. [42]

    Denholme, A

    S. Denholme, A. Yukawa, K. Tsumura, et al., Coexis- tence of superconductivity and charge-density wave in the quasi-one-dimensional material HfTe 3, Scientific Re- ports 7, 45217 (2017)

    2017

  36. [43]

    H. Jang, S. Song, T. Kihara, Y. Liu, S.-J. Lee, S.-Y. Park, M. Kim, H.-D. Kim, G. Coslovich, S. Nakata, Y. Kub- ota, I. Inoue, K. Tamasaku, M. Yabashi, H. Lee, C. Song, H. Nojiri, B. Keimer, C.-C. Kao, and J.-S. Lee, Charac- terization of photoinduced normal state through char...

    2022

  37. [44]

    Wandel, F

    S. Wandel, F. Boschini, E. H. da Silva Neto, L. Shen, M. X. Na, S. Zohar, Y. Wang, S. B. Welch, M. H. Seaberg, J. D. Koralek, G. L. Dakovski, W. Hettel, M.- F. Lin, S. P. Moeller, W. F. Schlotter, A. H. Reid, M. P. Minitti, T. Boyle, F. He, R. Sutarto, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Ha...

    2022

  38. [45]

    V. A. Stoica, D. Puggioni, J. Zhang, R. Singla, G. L. Dakovski, G. Coslovich, M. H. Seaberg, M. Kareev, S. Middey, P. Kissin, R. D. Averitt, J. Chakhalian, H. Wen, J. M. Rondinelli, and J. W. Freeland, Magnetic order driven ultrafast phase transition in ndnio 3, Phys. Rev. B 1...

    2022

  39. [46]

    A. J. Achkar, X. Mao, C. McMahon, R. Sutarto, F. He, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, and D. G. Hawthorn, Impact of quenched oxygen disorder on charge density wave order in YBa 2Cu3O6+x, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 107002 (2014)

    2014

  40. [47]

    B. Q. Song, X. Yang, C. Sundahl, J.-H. Kang, M. Mootz, Y. Yao, I. E. Perakis, L. Luo, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, Ultrafast martensitic phase transition driven by intense terahertz pulses, Ultrafast Science 3, 0007 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    G. Li, R. Medapalli, J. H. Mentink, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, T. G. H. Blank, S. K. K. Patel, A. K. Zvezdin, T. Rasing, E. E. Fullerton, and A. V. Kimel, Ultrafast kinetics of the antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic phase transition in ferh, Nature Communications 13, 2998 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    Proukakis, Quantum Gases: Finite Temperature and Non-equilibrium Dynamics, Cold atoms (Imperial Col- lege Press, 2013)

    N. Proukakis, Quantum Gases: Finite Temperature and Non-equilibrium Dynamics, Cold atoms (Imperial Col- lege Press, 2013)

    2013

  43. [50]

    Aron and C

    C. Aron and C. Chamon, Landau theory for non- equilibrium steady states, SciPost Phys. 8, 074 (2020)

    2020

  44. [51]

    G. F. Mazenko and M. Zannetti, Instability, spinodal de- composition, and nucleation in a system with continuous symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4565 (1985)

    1985

  45. [52]

    Pav´ on, Nonequilibrium fluctuations in cosmic vacuum decay, Phys

    D. Pav´ on, Nonequilibrium fluctuations in cosmic vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 43, 375 (1991)

    1991

  46. [53]

    P. E. Dolgirev, M. H. Michael, A. Zong, N. Gedik, and E. Demler, Self-similar dynamics of order parameter fluc- tuations in pump-probe experiments, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174306 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid he- lium?, Nature 317, 505 (1985)

    1985

  48. [56]

    Sun and A

    Z. Sun and A. J. Millis, Transient trapping into metastable states in systems with competing orders, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021028 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Biroli, L

    G. Biroli, L. F. Cugliandolo, and A. Sicilia, Kibble-zurek mechanism and infinitely slow annealing through critical points, Phys. Rev. E 81, 050101 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed mat- ter systems, Physics Reports 276, 177 (1996)

    W. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed mat- ter systems, Physics Reports 276, 177 (1996). 7

    1996

  51. [59]

    D. F. M. F. F. P. Claudio Giannetti, Mas- simo Capone and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of strongly correlated materials and high- temperature superconductors: a non-equilibrium approach, Advances in Physics 65, 58 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2016.1194044

    2016

  52. [60]

    Chandran, A

    A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, and S. L. Sondhi, Kibble-zurek problem: Universality and the scaling limit, Phys. Rev. B 86, 064304 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    Huber, S

    T. Huber, S. O. Mariager, A. Ferrer, H. Sch¨ afer, J. A. Johnson, S. Gr¨ ubel, A. L¨ ubcke, L. Huber, T. Kubacka, C. Dornes, C. Laulhe, S. Ravy, G. Ingold, P. Beaud, J. Demsar, and S. L. Johnson, Coherent structural dy- namics of a prototypical charge-density-wave-to-metal tra...

    2014

  54. [62]

    Yusupov, T

    R. Yusupov, T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, S. Brazovskii, P. Kusar, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, and D. Mihailovic, Co- herent dynamics of macroscopic electronic order through a symmetry breaking transition, Nature Physics 6, 681 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    We expand the order parameter ψj(r) = ¯ψj +P k̸=0 δψj,keik·r to take into account its spatial varia- tions about the mean-field value, ¯ψj

    as ⟨ηi(r, t)ηj(r′, t′)⟩ = ΓiT δi,jδ(t − t′)δ(r − r′). We expand the order parameter ψj(r) = ¯ψj +P k̸=0 δψj,keik·r to take into account its spatial varia- tions about the mean-field value, ¯ψj. The spatial fluc- tuations δψj,k are considered small compared to ¯ψj, ac- cording ...

  56. [64]

    Esarey, P

    E. Esarey, P. Sprangle, M. Pilloff, and J. Krall, The- ory and group velocity of ultrashort, tightly focused laser pulses, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 1695 (1995)

    1995

  57. [65]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966)

    1966

  58. [66]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. L. Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco- Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. B. Brookes, G. M. D. Luca, A. Frano, D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. M. Sala, D. C. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Su- tarto, G. A. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and L. Braicovich, Long-range...

    2012

  59. [67]

    ¯ψ1 = 0, ¯ψ2 2 = α2 4u2 ,

  60. [68]

    ¯ψ2 = 0, ¯ψ2 1 = α1 4u1 ,

  61. [69]

    (I.2) Let us assume case 1 has a smaller energy compared to case 2, − α2 2 16u2 < − α2 1 16u1 and compare case 1 and 3

    ¯ψ2 2 = α1c − 2u1α2 2c2 − 8u1u2 , ¯ψ2 1 = α2c − 2u2α1 2c2 − 8u1u2 . (I.2) Let us assume case 1 has a smaller energy compared to case 2, − α2 2 16u2 < − α2 1 16u1 and compare case 1 and 3. (Comparing case 2 and 3 with the inequality reversed produces the same result.) First, by...

  62. [70]

    ¯ψ1, − 1 Γ2 ∂t ¯ψ2 =(α2(t) + 4b2e2 ⃗A(t)2 + 4u2 ¯ψ2 2 + 2c ¯ψ2

  63. [71]

    (III.1) When the laser is on, ⃗A ̸= 0 and the system starts its dynamics

    ¯ψ2. (III.1) When the laser is on, ⃗A ̸= 0 and the system starts its dynamics. When the pump is on ⃗A2 is proportional to laser intensity I. Usually, the laser intensity is taken to be a Gaussian distribution; however, in the limits explored in this paper the corrections are r...

  64. [72]

    ¯ψ1, (III.5) for a general expression of ¯ψ2(t), the equation describing ¯ψ1(t) becomes ¯ψ1(t) = ¯ψ1(τ0)e R t τ0 (α1Γ1−2cΓ1 ¯ψ2(t′))dt′ r 1 + 8Γ1u1 ¯ψ2 1(τ0) R t τ0 e2 R t′ τ0 (α1Γ1−2cΓ1 ¯ψ2(˜t))d˜tdt′ . (III.6) For τ0 ≤ t ≤ tc the equations can be approximated as, ¯ψ2(t) = ¯ψ...

  65. [73]

    This encourages us to calculate the lifetime of the metastable state

    ¯ψ2, (III.11) ¯ψ2(t) = ¯ψ2,p   4u1e2Γ1α1(t−tp) − 4u1 ¯ψ2 1,p−α1 ¯ψ2 1,p 4u1 − 4u1 ¯ψ2 1,p−α1 ¯ψ2 1,p   − Γ2 Γ1 · c 4u1 e Γ2 tc(α′ 2+α2) e− t−τ0 tc −e− tp −τ0 tc +α2(t−tp) , (III.12) We get a solution that is valid in the range of tp < t < tr where tr is determined by ¯ψ2...

  66. [74]

    (III.13) Equation (III.13) shows the implicit solution to the metastability time, tr

    Therefore, 2u1 Γ2c ln ¯ψ2,p ¯ψ0 1 = α1 − 2 u1 c α2 (tr − tp) − 2u1 c tc(α′ 2 + α2)e− tp −τ0 tc (e− tr −tp tc − 1). (III.13) Equation (III.13) shows the implicit solution to the metastability time, tr. For small tr it can be approximated as tr − tp = 2u1 Γ2(α1c−2u1α2) ln( ¯ψ2,p...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.