Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Polaron effect in waveguide quantum optomechanics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantized atomic motion splits polariton bands and opens new gaps.

desk verdict A plausible Holstein mapping for WQED optomechanics, but the infinite-array band structure rests on a Markov approximation the authors admit fails exactly there. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17907 v1 pith:OGF4UN45 submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.optics

Denis Ilin , Alexander S. Solntsev , Ivan Iorsh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics
keywords polaronwaveguidequantumelectrodynamicsoptomechanicspolaritonMomentumAverageApproximationcoldatomsphononsidebandsslowlight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in a one-dimensional waveguide coupled to an array of optically trapped atoms, the atoms' quantized mechanical motion dresses the propagating polaritons and turns them into polarons. The central effect is resonant phonon-assisted mixing between the lower and upper polariton branches: when the phonon frequency $\Omega$ matches a detuning between a polariton and a composite phonon-plus-polariton state, the self-energy develops resonances, the bare polariton band anticrosses with phonon sidebands, and new band gaps open. Inside the original polariton gap, weakly dispersive (slow-light) polaron states appear, and the paper shows these show up as narrow resonances in the reflection spectrum of a semi-infinite array. If this is right, the phonon-dressed band structure gives a practical, tunable handle—the array spacing $\varphi$ sets the sideband positions—for slowing, storing, or filtering light in cold-atom waveguide QED.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Lee-Low-Pines-type unitary transformation $U = \exp(i k_0 \sum_j \hat{\sigma}^\dagger_j \hat{\sigma}_j \hat{z}_j)$, which moves the system to the atoms' moving frames and, after integrating out the waveguide photons, converts the problem into an effective Holstein Hamiltonian with the modified particle dispersion $\epsilon(q) = \omega_0 + \Gamma_0 \sin\varphi/(\cos(qd)-\cos\varphi)$. Because the polariton-phonon coupling strength $\beta = \Omega \alpha_0$ is momentum independent, the Momentum Average Approximation (MAA) yields a momentum-independent self-energy $\Sigma(\omega)$, Eq. (9), expressed as a continued fraction of the momentum-averaged free polariton Green's function evaluated at $\omega$, $\omega-\Omega$, $\omega-2\Omega$, ...; the Van Hove singularities of that Green's function at the band edges are carried into $\Sigma$, producing phonon-sideband resonances and anticrossings. For the semi-infinite chain the same self-energy is inserted into the real-space Green's function, which is used to compute the reflection coefficient $r(\omega)$.

What would settle it

Take an array with $\varphi \approx \pi/2$ and $\Gamma_0/\Omega \approx 1$, vary its length beyond the regime $1/\Gamma_0 > Nd/c$, and measure the reflection spectrum; the theory predicts a narrow resonance inside the polariton gap at the one-phonon sideband, whose position and width are set by the self-energy. If that resonance disappears or broadens continuously as $N$ grows, the Markov-based infinite-array band structure is the part of the argument to reject.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the optomechanical coupling between photon scattering and atomic trap motion produces a pronounced single-excitation polaron effect in a waveguide QED array, and that the effect is captured by a unitary transformation that maps the problem onto a Holstein-type model with linear exciton-phonon coupling. In the transformed frame, the single-polariton Green's function acquires a momentum-independent self-energy $\Sigma(\omega)$ written as a continued fraction (Eq. 9); because it samples the free polariton Green's function at $\omega$, $\omega-\Omega$, $\omega-2\Omega$, ..., the Van Hove singularities at the polariton band edges are copied into resonances inside the polariton gap. These resonances anticross the bare polariton dispersion, opening new gaps at the one- and two-phonon intersections and producing weakly dispersive in-gap states. The same self-energy, inserted into the semi-infinite Green's function, yields narrow resonances in the reflection spectrum, so the paper concludes the polaron spectrum is directly probeable via resonant elastic scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The whole band-structure prediction rests on replacing the photon momentum $k$ in the optomechanical phase $k \hat{z}_j$ by the resonant value $k_0$, the Markov approximation; the authors state this stops being valid for an infinite array, where photon-flight retardation must be included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At arbitrary optomechanical strength, the single-excitation polaron dispersion is computable from the continued-fraction self-energy, so the prediction is not limited to weak coupling.
  • Whenever the phonon frequency $\Omega$ is small enough that sidebands fall inside the polariton gap, weakly dispersive in-gap states appear, and their energies shift with the interatomic phase $\varphi$.
  • A reflection spectrum of a semi-infinite chain should display narrow resonances inside the polariton gap, giving an unambiguous optical signature of phonon dressing.
  • Near the anticrossings the middle band is a superposition of zero-, one-, and two-phonon polaritons, and the average phonon number of each band varies with momentum according to the Hellmann-Feynman derivative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted in-gap reflection resonances survive in experiment, the same dressed-state structure could be used as a single-photon delay line or quantum memory, since weakly dispersive states should propagate at sharply reduced group velocity.
  • The classical-noise appendix implies a qualitative boundary: once $\Omega$ is small enough for phonon fluctuations to act as static disorder, localization appears even at weak coupling, so the polaron band picture likely holds only above a crossover phonon frequency; locating that crossover is a natural follow-up.
  • Since the self-energy samples the free Green's function at an entire ladder $\omega - n\Omega$, the approach should extend to other long-range hopping dispersions and to multi-phonon sidebands beyond the two shown, provided momentum-dependent coupling does not invalidate the momentum-average scheme.
  • One testable extension: tune $\varphi$ from $\pi/3$ to $\pi/2$ and map the predicted shift of the in-gap resonance energy in the same sample; the paper's dispersion formulas give an unambiguous quantitative prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies an array of two-level atoms held in harmonic optical traps and coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide. After a Lee-Low-Pines-type unitary transformation and a Markovian replacement of the photon momentum by k0, the authors map the system onto a Holstein-like model with a modified polariton dispersion. They solve the single-polariton Green's function with the momentum-average approximation, obtaining a continued-fraction self-energy. The central claim is that phonon-assisted processes open new polariton band gaps and create weakly dispersive in-gap states, and that these appear as narrow resonances in the reflection spectrum of a semi-infinite array.

Significance. If established, the result would add a new axis of control to waveguide QED: trap phonons dressing propagating polaritons, with tunability via the lattice phase phi. The mapping to the Holstein model is clean, the MAA machinery is appropriate for the effective model, and the reflection calculation offers a concrete observable. The finite-array phonon-occupancy check and the classical-disorder appendix are useful complementary pieces. However, the central band-structure and reflection predictions are computed for infinite or semi-infinite arrays under a Markovian approximation that the authors themselves state fails as N grows; the significance is therefore conditional on closing that gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, near Eq. (6) and the paragraph on the Markov approximation] The central band-structure result is obtained from the infinite-array Bloch dispersion ϵ(q)=ω0+Γ0 sin φ/(cos qd − cos φ), which diverges at cos qd = cos φ. The authors state that replacing k z_j by k0 z_j is equivalent to the Markov approximation and that this approximation is valid only for 1/Γ0 > Nd/c; they explicitly add that 'as N→∞ the retardation effects will have to be taken into account.' The self-energy resonances in Eq. (9) are produced by the Van Hove singularities of gbar0(ω) in Eq. (10), and those singularities originate from the divergence of ϵ(q). Hence the new gaps and in-gap states shown in Figs. 2–4 are not established for the infinite arrays for which the band structure is computed. The manuscript needs either (i) a non-Markovian treatment of the photon-mediated hopping showing that the singularities survive with a finite-bandwidth kernel, or (ii) a restriction of the claims to finite N with direct finite-N evidence of the gaps and in-gap states.
  2. [Figure 3 and the paragraph discussing the yellow stars] The finite-N benchmark is limited to N=6 and to matching the average phonon occupancy of selected eigenlevels. It does not test whether the new band gaps open at the predicted positions or whether the narrow in-gap reflection resonances of Fig. 5 exist in a finite chain. Since the Markov approximation is legitimate for experimentally relevant finite chains, a finite-N spectral-function or reflection calculation with N varied across the range where the in-gap features develop would provide the load-bearing validation that is currently missing.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (12), and Appendix B] The reflection coefficient is constructed from the same Markovian polariton momentum q defined by Eq. (B3), and the semi-infinite Green's function in Eq. (B2) uses that q in both the boundary term and the reflection formula. The predicted in-gap resonance in Fig. 5 therefore inherits the unbounded Markovian dispersion rather than being an independent observable signature. The main text should state this dependence explicitly and quantify the maximum N for which the semi-infinite reflection calculation remains controlled; as written, the reader cannot tell whether the resonance would survive a non-Markovian boundary Green's function.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (7)] The notation for the MAA order is inconsistent: Eq. (7) defines Fn, but the text then refers to F'_n and MAA(n) without defining n or the averaging procedure explicitly. Please clarify the hierarchy of approximations.
  2. [Figure 2(d)] The panel should label which curve is Re Σ and which is Im Σ, and the black dashed lines mentioned in the caption should be identified in the panel itself.
  3. [Appendix B] There are typographical errors: 'Eg. (4)' should be 'Eq. (4)' and 'Instaed' should be 'Instead'. The same applies to the Fig. 6 caption, where 'the the the first four up bands' and 'systemn' need correction.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A15)] Equation (A15) for the inverse localization length in the large-disorder limit is stated without derivation; a short explanation of the limit or a reference to the symmetric-group calculation would make the appendix self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the polaron band structure and reflection spectra are derived from the stated Hamiltonian and standard MAA, with no fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that phonon-assisted mixing creates new band gaps and weakly dispersive in-gap states — is obtained by solving the Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) after a unitary transformation (Eq. 2) and a stated Markovian approximation (kα ≈ k0α). The resulting Holstein-like Hamiltonian (Eq. 5) has a momentum-dependent dispersion ϵ(q) from Eq. (6), and the Momentum Average Approximation self-energy (Eq. 9) is a standard, parameter-free tool from the polaron literature. The new gaps arise from Van Hove singularities of the averaged Green's function (Eq. 10), which is itself derived from the model's dispersion. The reflection spectrum (Fig. 5) follows from the same self-energy via the semi-infinite Green's function, not from external data. There is no parameter fitting, no quantity defined in terms of another that is later 'predicted', and no load-bearing self-citation: the only self-citation (Ref. [27]) is a consistency check for the two-qubit limit and is not required for the infinite-array derivation. The authors' explicit caveat that retardation effects must be considered as N→∞ is a validity limitation of the Markov approximation, not evidence of circular reasoning, since the approximation is stated up front and not derived from the target results. The derivation is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four domain assumptions: the resonant-wavevector (Markov/Lamb-Dicke) approximation, the single-excitation sector, Markovian photon-mediated hopping, and MAA as a controlled approximation. The first and third are partially self-contradictory because the authors compute infinite-array bands while admitting the approximations fail for large N. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new fundamental entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption k z_j is approximated by k0 z_j, the optomechanical phase evaluated at the resonant wavevector.
    Used to derive the unitary transformation and the translationally invariant Holstein-type Hamiltonian (Eqs. 2-5). The authors equate this to the Markov approximation and state it is valid only for finite arrays with 1/Gamma0 > Nd/c, yet the band-structure calculation is for infinite arrays.
  • domain assumption The system is restricted to the single-excitation sector, with spins replaced by bosons.
    Required to obtain the one-particle Holstein model (Eq. 5) and the MAA Green's function; multiphoton nonlinearities and multi-excitation physics are not covered.
  • domain assumption Photon-mediated coupling is Markovian: photons are integrated out, giving instantaneous infinite-range hopping Gamma0 exp(i phi |j-l|).
    Neglects retardation; the authors explicitly flag that this approximation fails as N approaches infinity, which limits the validity of the infinite-array band-structure results.
  • domain assumption The Momentum Average Approximation (MAA) accurately captures the polaron spectral weight at the couplings considered.
    MAA neglects phonon correlations and is an approximation; the paper provides no convergence tests or error estimates, and the MAA order used for the plotted spectra is not specified.
  • domain assumption Atomic motion is one-dimensional along the waveguide and the traps are harmonic.
    The model Hamiltonian (1) assumes parabolic traps and 1D motion; anharmonicities, transverse motion, and trap imperfections are neglected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polaron effect in waveguide quantum optomechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OGF4UN45

@misc{pith2026241117907,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polaron effect in waveguide quantum optomechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OGF4UN45}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17907}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of the quantized mechanical motion of optically trapped atoms, arranged in proximity to a one-dimensional waveguide, on the propagation of polariton modes. Our study identifies a regime of resonant phonon-assisted mixing between lower and upper polaritons, resulting in a pronounced polaron effect. This effect is characterized by the formation of new band gaps and the appearance of weakly dispersive states within the original polariton band gap. The polaron spectrum, which can be directly probed via resonant elastic scattering, provides novel opportunities for quantum optical applications. These findings open avenues for enhanced control in state-of-the-art waveguide quantum electrodynamics experiments with cold atoms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17907 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic image of the considered system. An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The case Γ0/Ω = 1/8 and distance φ = π/2 is con￾sidered. a) spectral weights ln(A(ω, k)) in the first Brillouin zone for the model are plotted via MAA. The black dashed line corresponds the divergent point of the polaritonic disper￾sion. The grey zones denote forbidden zones. b) dispersion of polarons in the vicinity of one phonon intersection. c) disper￾sion of polarons in the vicinity of two phonons intersection. … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The case Γ0/Ω = 1 and distance φ = π/3 is con￾sidered. a) spectral weights ln(A(ω, k)) in the first Brillouin zone for the model is plotted via MA. The black dashed line corresponds the divergent point of the polaritonic dispersion. The gray zones denote forbidden zones. b) dispersion of po￾larons in the vicinity of one phonon intersection. c) dispersion of polarons in the vicinity of two phonons intersection. The g… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The average number of phonons in the the the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic of the semi-classical model. treat them as an effective potential of atom interaction Hˆ = Hˆ 0 + Vˆ where Hˆ 0 = (ω0 − iΓ0) X N j=1 σˆ † jσˆj ; Vˆ = −iΓ0 X N l̸=j e iφ|l−j| e iφk0sgnlj (zl−zj )σˆ † l σˆj = X N l̸=j tljσˆ † l σˆj , (A2) where tlj is a random …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The inverse localization length as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Designing exotic many-body states of atomic spin and motion in photonic crystals,

    Marco T Manzoni, Ludwig Mathey, and Darrick E Chang, “Designing exotic many-body states of atomic spin and motion in photonic crystals,” Nature communi- cations 8, 14696 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    Model In this section, we investigate periodically spaced qubits with mechanical oscillations near their centers in a bidirectional waveguide, modeling qubit displacements using a classical Gaussian distribution to represent noise Fig. 7. This model represents the limit case of quantum mechanical oscillations, when the phonon frequency van- ishes, i.e Ω →...

    work page

  3. [2]

    In order to calculate it, the most straightforward method is to use the for- malism of transfer matrix

    T ransfer matrix formalism The main characteristic of such disordered system is the inverse length of localization, mainly because it is possible to measure it in practice. In order to calculate it, the most straightforward method is to use the for- malism of transfer matrix. The fundamental theorem in this formalism declares that the transfer matrix of t...

    work page

  4. [3]

    The inverse localization length Getting back to the main purpose of using the transfer matrix formalism, we need to establish the connection between the inverse localization length and elements of the global transfer matrix. It can be done with the help of connecting our problem to the condensed matter prob- lem where it can be expressed via the resistanc...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Colloquium: strongly interacting photons in one- dimensional continuum,

    Dibyendu Roy, C. M. Wilson, and Ofer Firsten- berg, “ Colloquium: strongly interacting photons in one- dimensional continuum,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Colloquium: quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons,

    D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble, “ Colloquium: quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 031002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [6]

    Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collec- tive radiance and photon-photon correlations,

    Alexandra S. Sheremet, Mihail I. Petrov, Ivan V. Iorsh, Alexander V. Poshakinskiy, and Alexander N. Pod- dubny, “Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collec- tive radiance and photon-photon correlations,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    Large bragg reflec- tion from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms near a nanoscale waveguide,

    Neil V. Corzo, Baptiste Gouraud, Aveek Chandra, Akihisa Goban, Alexandra S. Sheremet, Dmitriy V. Kupriyanov, and Julien Laurat, “Large bragg reflec- tion from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms near a nanoscale waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 133603 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays,

    Neil V. Corzo, J´ er´ emy Raskop, Aveek Chandra, Alexan- dra S. Sheremet, Baptiste Gouraud, and Julien Laurat, “Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays,” Nature 566, 359–362 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    An integrated atom array-nanophotonic chip platform with background-free imaging,

    Shankar G Menon, Noah Glachman, Matteo Pompili, Alan Dibos, and Hannes Bernien, “An integrated atom array-nanophotonic chip platform with background-free imaging,” Nature Communications 15, 6156 (2024)

    2024

  3. [10]

    Collective radiative dynamics of an ensemble of cold atoms coupled to an optical waveg- uide,

    Riccardo Pennetta, Martin Blaha, Aisling Johnson, Daniel Lechner, Philipp Schneeweiss, J¨ urgen Volz, and Arno Rauschenbeutel, “Collective radiative dynamics of an ensemble of cold atoms coupled to an optical waveg- uide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 073601 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Coupling ultracold atoms to a superconducting coplanar waveguide resonator,

    H Hattermann, D Bothner, LY Ley, B Ferdinand, D Wiedmaier, L S´ ark´ any, Reinhold Kleiner, Dieter Koelle, and J Fort´ agh, “Coupling ultracold atoms to a superconducting coplanar waveguide resonator,” Nature communications 8, 2254 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Tunable photon statistics exploiting the fano effect in a waveguide,

    A. P. Foster, D. Hallett, I. V. Iorsh, S. J. Sheldon, M. R. Godsland, B. Royall, E. Clarke, I. A. Shelykh, A. M. Fox, M. S. Skolnick, I. E. Itskevich, and L. R. Wilson, “Tunable photon statistics exploiting the fano effect in a waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 173603 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    Chiral topo- logical photonics with an embedded quantum emitter,

    Mahmoud Jalali Mehrabad, Andrew P Foster, Ren´ e Dost, Edmund Clarke, Pallavi K Patil, A Mark Fox, Maurice S Skolnick, and Luke R Wilson, “Chiral topo- logical photonics with an embedded quantum emitter,” Optica 7, 1690–1696 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Independent electrical control of two quantum dots coupled through a photonic-crystal waveg- uide,

    Xiao-Liu Chu, Camille Papon, Nikolai Bart, Andreas D. Wieck, Arne Ludwig, Leonardo Midolo, Nir Rotenberg, and Peter Lodahl, “Independent electrical control of two quantum dots coupled through a photonic-crystal waveg- uide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 033606 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    On-chip deterministic operation of quan- tum dots in dual-mode waveguides for a plug-and-play single-photon source,

    Ravitej Uppu, Hans T Eriksen, Henri Thyrrestrup, Asli D U˘ gurlu, Ying Wang, Sven Scholz, Andreas D Wieck, Arne Ludwig, Matthias C L¨ obl, Richard J War- burton, et al., “On-chip deterministic operation of quan- tum dots in dual-mode waveguides for a plug-and-play single-photo...

    2020

  9. [16]

    Reconfigurable quantum photonic cir- cuits based on quantum dots,

    Adam McCaw, Jacob Ewaniuk, Bhavin J Shastri, and Nir Rotenberg, “Reconfigurable quantum photonic cir- cuits based on quantum dots,” Nanophotonics (2024), https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0044

    2024 doi

  10. [17]

    Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms,

    A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, K. Lalumiere, B. C. Sanders, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, “Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms,” Science342, 1494–1496 (2013)

    2013

  11. [18]

    Cavity quantum electrodynamics with atom-like mir- rors,

    Mohammad Mirhosseini, Eunjong Kim, Xueyue Zhang, Alp Sipahigil, Paul B. Dieterle, Andrew J. Keller, Ana Asenjo-Garcia, Darrick E. Chang, and Oskar Painter, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics with atom-like mir- rors,” Nature 569, 692–697 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms,

    Bharath Kannan, Max J Ruckriegel, Daniel L Campbell, Anton Frisk Kockum, Jochen Braum¨ uller, David K Kim, Morten Kjaergaard, Philip Krantz, Alexander Melville, Bethany M Niedzielski, et al., “Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms,” Natu...

    2020

  13. [20]

    On-demand directional microwave photon emission using waveguide quantum electrodynamics,

    Bharath Kannan, Aziza Almanakly, Youngkyu Sung, Agustin Di Paolo, David A Rower, Jochen Braum¨ uller, Alexander Melville, Bethany M Niedzielski, Amir Karamlou, Kyle Serniak, et al., “On-demand directional microwave photon emission using waveguide quantum electrodynamics,” Natu...

    2023

  14. [21]

    Decoherence-free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics,

    Anton Frisk Kockum, G¨ oran Johansson, and Franco Nori, “Decoherence-free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 140404 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Quantum chaos driven by long-range 9 waveguide-mediated interactions,

    Alexander V. Poshakinskiy, Janet Zhong, and Alexan- der N. Poddubny, “Quantum chaos driven by long-range 9 waveguide-mediated interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 203602 (2021)

    2021

  16. [23]

    Replica sym- metry breaking in a quantum-optical vector spin glass,

    Ronen M. Kroeze, Brendan P. Marsh, David Atri Schuller, Henry S. Hunt, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Jonathan Keeling, and Benjamin L. Lev, “Replica sym- metry breaking in a quantum-optical vector spin glass,” (2023), arXiv:2311.04216 [quant-ph]

    2023

  17. [24]

    Demonstration of a memory for tightly guided light in an optical nanofiber,

    B. Gouraud, D. Maxein, A. Nicolas, O. Morin, and J. Laurat, “Demonstration of a memory for tightly guided light in an optical nanofiber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 180503 (2015)

    2015

  18. [25]

    A unidirectional on- chip photonic interface for superconducting circuits,

    P-O Guimond, B Vermersch, ML Juan, A Sharafiev, G Kirchmair, and P Zoller, “A unidirectional on- chip photonic interface for superconducting circuits,” npj Quantum Information 6, 32 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    Frequency combs with parity-protected cross-correlations and entanglement from dynamically modulated qubit arrays,

    Denis Ilin, Alexander V. Poshakinskiy, Alexander N. Poddubny, and Ivan Iorsh, “Frequency combs with parity-protected cross-correlations and entanglement from dynamically modulated qubit arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 023601 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    Quantization of atomic motion in optical molasses,

    Y Castin and J Dalibard, “Quantization of atomic motion in optical molasses,” Europhysics Letters 14, 761 (1991)

    1991

  21. [28]

    Self- organization of atoms along a nanophotonic waveguide,

    D. E. Chang, J. I. Cirac, and H. J. Kimble, “Self- organization of atoms along a nanophotonic waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 113606 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Waveguide quantum optomechanics: Parity- time phase transitions in ultrastrong coupling regime,

    Ivan Iorsh, Alexander Poshakinskiy, and Alexander Poddubny, “Waveguide quantum optomechanics: Parity- time phase transitions in ultrastrong coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 183601 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Chiral waveg- uide optomechanics: First order quantum phase transi- tions with 𭟋3 symmetry breaking,

    D. D. Sedov, V. K. Kozin, and I. V. Iorsh, “Chiral waveg- uide optomechanics: First order quantum phase transi- tions with 𭟋3 symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 263606 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Emergent quasiperiodicity from polariton-phonon hybrid excitations in waveguide quantum optomechan- ics,

    Han-Jie Zhu, Lin Zhuang, Xiao-Ming Zhao, Jin-Kui Zhao, Jian-Jun Zhang, Guo-Feng Zhang, and Wu-Ming Liu, “Emergent quasiperiodicity from polariton-phonon hybrid excitations in waveguide quantum optomechan- ics,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 165419 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Optome- chanical strong coupling between a single photon and a single atom,

    Javier Arg¨ uello-Luengo and Darrick E Chang, “Optome- chanical strong coupling between a single photon and a single atom,” New Journal of Physics 24, 023006 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Exact solvability and two-frequency rabi oscillation in cavity-qed setup with moving emitter,

    Mingzhu Weng and Zhihai Wang, “Exact solvability and two-frequency rabi oscillation in cavity-qed setup with moving emitter,” Europhysics Letters 138, 55002 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Systematic improve- ment of the momentum average approximation for the green’s function of a holstein polaron,

    Mona Berciu and Glen L. Goodvin, “Systematic improve- ment of the momentum average approximation for the green’s function of a holstein polaron,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 165109 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Absence of phase transitions in holstein sys- tems,

    H. L¨ owen, “Absence of phase transitions in holstein sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. B 37, 8661–8667 (1988)

    1988

  29. [37]

    Green’s function of the holstein polaron,

    Glen L. Goodvin, Mona Berciu, and George A. Sawatzky, “Green’s function of the holstein polaron,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 245104 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    Hellmann-feynman theorem in non-hermitian systems,

    Gaurav Hajong, Ranjan Modak, and Bhabani Prasad Mandal, “Hellmann-feynman theorem in non-hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. A 109, 022227 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Holstein polaron in the presence of disorder,

    A. S. Mishchenko M. Berciu and N. Nagaosa, “Holstein polaron in the presence of disorder,” Europhysics Letters 89 (2010), 10.1209/0295-5075/89/37007

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    Symmetry and transport of waves in one- dimensional disordered systems,

    J. B Pendry, “Symmetry and transport of waves in one- dimensional disordered systems,” Advances in Physics 43, 461–542 (1994)

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.