Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Convergence of the inverse Monge-Ampere flow and Nadel multiplier ideal sheaves

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that natural bounds on the potentials of the inverse Monge-Ampere flow force convergence to the twisted Kähler-Einstein metric, and that without such a metric the flow generates a proper multiplier ideal sheaf with…

desk verdict Plausible and likely correct extension of the inverse MA flow to the twisted Fano setting, but the unproved transfer of long-time estimates in Theorem 2.6 is load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17978 v3 pith:IDOARBDP submitted 2024-11-27 math.DG math.AG

Nikita Klemyatin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AG MSC 53C5532Q2032W2053E30
keywords inverseMonge-AmpereflowtwistedKähler-Einsteinmetricmultiplieridealsheafalpha-invariantpluripotentialtheorygeodesicrayC0estimateFanomanifold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the inverse Monge-Ampere flow, a gradient flow originally introduced for untwisted Fano manifolds, to the twisted setting where $[\omega_0]+[\beta]=c_1(X)$ with $\beta$ semipositive. It establishes that, on manifolds without holomorphic vector fields, convergence to the twisted Kähler-Einstein metric is equivalent to any of five natural bounds on the evolving potentials, and that several other familiar bounds, including the $\alpha$-invariant bound, also force convergence. If no twisted Kähler-Einstein metric exists, the flow cannot satisfy those bounds, and a normalized subsequence converges in $L^1$ to a potential whose multiplier ideal sheaf is proper and satisfies a Nadel-type vanishing theorem. The paper also proves a linear growth bound $\|\varphi\|_{C^0}\le M(t+1)$ and uses it to produce nontrivial $d_p$-geodesic rays asymptotic to diverging trajectories. These results matter because they remove the assumption that a Kähler-Einstein metric already exists and replace the unavailable gradient estimates of the Ricci-flow setting with pluripotential theory.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the inverse Monge-Ampere flow $\dot{\varphi}=1-e^{\rho}$, where $\rho$ is the Ricci potential of the twisted metric $\omega_\varphi$ defined by $\mathrm{Ric}(\omega_\varphi)=\omega_\varphi+\beta+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar\partial\rho$, together with the monotonicity of the twisted Mabuchi energy and the convexity of the functional $F$ along the flow. The crucial identity is the $\alpha$-invariant inequality $((n+1)\alpha-n)\sup_X\varphi \le \log\left(\frac{1}{V}\int_X e^{-\alpha(\varphi-\sup_X\varphi)}\,\omega_0^n\right)+C$, which converts a bound on the $\alpha$-invariant into a uniform upper bound on $\sup_X\varphi$. For the multiplier ideal sheaf half, the normalized potentials $\psi_j$ carry the $L^1$ limit, and the effective semicontinuity theorem plus the multiplier ideal sheaf vanishing theorem produce the proper ideal sheaf and the cohomology vanishing. The $L^\infty$ bound rests on a $C^2$ estimate $\log\mathrm{Tr}_{\omega_0}\,\omega_\varphi \le C+A(\varphi-\inf_X\varphi)+t-\inf_X\varphi$ combined with Sobolev iteration and a sharp $L^1$-energy inequality that bounds the $L^1$ norm of $e^{-B\psi}$ by the Monge-Ampere energy.

What would settle it

Take any compact Kähler manifold with no holomorphic vector fields and a semipositive $\beta$ with [omega0]+[$\beta$]=c1(X) for which no twisted Kähler-Einstein metric exists, and solve the twisted inverse Monge-Ampere flow; if sup_X phi or the L^p integral of $e^{{-p phi}}$ stays bounded, or if the flow fails to exist for all time, the paper's main claims fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a compact Kähler manifold with $H^0(X,T^{1,0}X)=0$ and $[\omega_0]+[\beta]=c_1(X)$, $\beta\ge 0$ semipositive, the paper claims that along the inverse Monge-Ampere flow the following are equivalent: uniform upper bound of $\sup_X\varphi$, uniform upper bound of $\frac{1}{V}\int_X\varphi\,\omega_0^n$, uniform bound of $J(\varphi)$ or $d_1(0,\varphi)$, uniform bound of $I(\varphi)$, and uniform bound of $\frac{1}{V}\int_X e^{-p\varphi}\,\omega_0^n$ for some $p>1$; each implies the flow converges to the unique twisted Kähler-Einstein metric. It further claims that $\alpha(X,\omega_0)>\frac{n}{n+1}$, bounded oscillation, lower bound on $\inf_X\varphi$, or bounded $d_p$-distance for $p>1$ each force the same convergence. If no twisted Kähler-Einstein metric exists, the paper concludes both $\|\varphi\|_{C^0}$ and the average are unbounded along the flow, and for $\alpha>\frac{n}{n+1}$ a subsequence of the normalized potentials $\psi_j=\varphi_j-\frac{1}{V}\int_X\varphi_j\,\omega_{\varphi_j}^n$ converges in $L^1$ to $\psi_\infty$ with $\mathcal{I}(\alpha\psi_\infty)$ a proper multiplier ideal sheaf and $H^q(X,-\lfloor\alpha\rfloor K_X\otimes\mathcal{I}(\alpha\psi_\infty))=0$ for all $q\ge 1$. Separately, the paper proves $\|\varphi\|_{C^0}\le M(t+1)$ along the flow, and from this constructs nontrivial $d_p$-geodesic rays weakly asymptotic to diverging trajectories, on which $F$ is convex and decreasing, whose normalized limit $\varphi_\infty$ satisfies $\int_X e^{-\frac{n}{n+1}\varphi_\infty}\,\omega_0^n=+\infty$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the twisted inverse Monge-Ampere flow with a semipositive beta exists for all time and inherits the standard a priori estimates from the untwisted case, since the paper does not reprove that regularity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If any of the five equivalent bounds holds along the flow, the twisted inverse Monge-Ampere flow converges smoothly to the unique twisted Kähler-Einstein metric, so existence of that metric is detected by a single uniform bound on potentials.
  • On any manifold without a twisted Kähler-Einstein metric, $\sup_X\varphi$ and the average potential are necessarily unbounded along the flow, so the flow provides an explicit destabilizing mechanism.
  • For $\alpha>\frac{n}{n+1}$, a diverging inverse Monge-Ampere trajectory produces a proper multiplier ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}(\alpha\psi_\infty)$ with vanishing $H^q(X,-\lfloor\alpha\rfloor K_X\otimes\mathcal{I}(\alpha\psi_\infty))$ for all $q\ge 1$, recovering the standard obstruction to Kähler-Einstein metrics from the flow itself.
  • The linear bound $\|\varphi\|_{C^0}\le M(t+1)$ gives a concrete qualitative growth estimate for the inverse Monge-Ampere flow, and it allows construction of nontrivial $d_p$-geodesic rays asymptotic to the flow with an integrability failure at exponent $\frac{n}{n+1}$.
  • The paper recovers, in the twisted inverse-flow setting, the multiplier ideal sheaf results previously known for the Kähler-Ricci flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not say this, but the equivalence of the five bounds suggests that global convergence of the inverse Monge-Ampere flow is controlled entirely by finite-energy classes; one could test numerically on toric Fano surfaces whether the $d_1$ bound is the easiest to verify.
  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is to replace the smooth semipositive form $\beta$ by a positive current and ask whether the same five-bounds equivalence survives; the pluripotential tools used here are the natural language for that generalization.
  • If the linear growth estimate is sharp, it would imply that the divergence rate of normalized potentials is at most linear; comparing the constant $M$ in the growth bound with the alpha-invariant could give a quantitative slope for the destabilizing geodesic ray.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the inverse Monge-Ampère flow on a compact Kähler manifold X in the twisted setting where [ω0]+[β]=c1(X) with β≥0. Under the assumption H^0(X,T^{1,0}X)=0, Theorem 1.1 asserts the equivalence of several uniform bounds along the flow (sup φ, average ∫φ, J and d1, I, and L^p integrability of e^{-φ}) and that each of these bounds implies convergence to the twisted Kähler-Einstein metric; it also lists sufficient criteria involving the α-invariant, oscillation, inf φ, and d_p. Theorem 1.2 claims that if no twisted Kähler-Einstein metric exists, then normalized potentials ψ_j admit an L^1 limit ψ_∞ whose multiplier ideal sheaf I(αψ_∞) is proper and satisfies the cohomology vanishing (1.6). Theorem 1.3 claims the linear growth bound ||φ||_{C0}≤M(t+1), and Theorem 1.4 applies this bound to construct weakly asymptotic d_p-geodesic rays. The proofs rely on convexity of F, monotonicity of M, pluripotential compactness, and imported estimates from [9], [2], [20], and [13].

Significance. If correct, the paper would extend the Collins–Hisamoto–Takahashi inverse Monge-Ampère flow to the twisted Kähler-Einstein setting and provide a pluripotential-theoretic analogue of the Kähler-Ricci flow results of Phong–Sesum–Sturm and Rubinshtein, avoiding Perelman estimates and uniform Sobolev inequalities. The paper is explicit about this methodological choice and does not fit parameters or rely on invented entities; the α-invariant, Nadel vanishing, and the Trudinger inequality are external benchmarks. The claims are coherent and plausible, and the recovery of results from [27] and [29] is a genuine application rather than a restatement. However, the verification of the flow-regularity input and of the Nadel-vanishing application is not yet at the standard required for the central theorems.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Theorem 2.6] The long-time existence and convergence for the twisted inverse Monge-Ampère flow is asserted by saying that the arguments from [9, Theorems 4.6 and 4.11] "carry over verbatim" because F is convex and the equation for the potential is formally independent of β. This is not a proof of the a priori estimates: the metric evolution (2.3), the evolution of ρ, the maximum-principle and Sobolev steps, and the spectral estimate for L_ρ all involve the twist β through Ric(ω_φ)=ω_φ+β+√-1∂∂ρ. The paper does not identify which estimates are β-independent, which require only β≥0, and which would need new hypotheses. Since every later theorem (1.1–1.4) assumes a solution of this twisted flow, this transfer is load-bearing and must be supplied in detail.
  2. [Section 5, Theorem 5.4] The cohomology vanishing (5.4), H^q(X,-⌊α⌋K_X⊗I(αψ_∞))=0, does not follow from the Nadel vanishing theorem as stated in Theorem 5.2. For α∈(n/(n+1),1), ⌊α⌋=0 and -⌊α⌋K_X is trivial, whereas Nadel vanishing requires a line bundle L with curvature current F_H≥εω, so the proposed vanishing is not a direct consequence of positive curvature. The proof must specify the line bundle L and the singular metric on it for which I(αψ_∞) is the multiplier ideal sheaf, and verify the curvature hypothesis.
  3. [Section 6, Theorem 6.2 (Theorem 1.3)] The statement of Theorem 1.3 is unconditional, but the Introduction says the linear bound is proved "under the additional assumption that ω_φ^n is exponentially bounded along the flow". The proof uses the Trudinger inequality (6.9) to bound log||u||_1 by C/V∫(-ψ)ω_ψ^n+C; this inequality is not valid for arbitrary large exponent B without extra hypotheses or a known exponential integrability bound. In addition, the Moser-iteration step in (6.4)–(6.8) compresses the interpolation argument for ||u||_{1-δ} and the passage from (6.7) to (6.8); the latter requires the elementary bound ||u||_{1-δ}≤||u||_{C0}, which is not stated. If the result is intended to be unconditional, the hypothesis must be removed or the Trudinger input justified; as written, the proof is too terse for a load-bearing claim.
  4. [Section 4, Proposition 4.1] In the proof of (2)=>(1), after obtaining L^1 convergence of φ_j, the paper states that the "effective version of semicontinuity theorem" guarantees that e^{-pφ_j} converge to e^{-pφ_j} in L^1 (the limit should be e^{-pφ_∞}). This convergence is asserted without a reference or a uniform integrability argument, and it is then used to conclude that c(t) is uniformly bounded and F(φ_j)≥-B. Since this is the step that converts L^1 convergence into the coercivity input for strong convergence, it should be justified explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 5.4] "If X does not admit the KE metric in c_1(X)" should read "twisted Kähler-Einstein metric", since the theorem concerns the twisted equation Ric(ω_φ)=ω_φ+β.
  2. [Section 4, Proposition 4.2] Equation (4.8) uses C0=E(φ) without mentioning that E is normalized to zero or constant along the flow; if E≠0, the constant should be made explicit.
  3. [Section 1 and Section 6] The Introduction states that Theorem 1.3 is proved under an additional exponential volume-form bound, but the theorem statement in Section 6 omits this hypothesis; the inconsistency should be resolved.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typos and formatting issues, including "Holder continious" in Section 1, extra closing parentheses in the exponents of (5.5) and (5.6), and the repeated "converge to e^{-pφ_j}" in Proposition 4.1, which should be "e^{-pφ_∞}".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all load-bearing inputs are external results (chiefly [9]'s inverse MA flow estimates), no fitted parameters, and no self-citation chain.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no circular step. The central results (Theorems 1.1-1.4) are derived from the flow equations (2.2)-(2.4), which are formally independent of beta; from monotonicity identities for F and M (Lemma 2.3); from Tian's alpha-invariant as an external numerical input; and from external analytic results ([1,2,4,5,9,15,17,18,20,24,25]) for compactness, Skoda's theorem, Nadel vanishing, the Trudinger inequality, and twisted Bando-Mabuchi uniqueness. No parameter is fitted to data, and no target conclusion is assumed as a hypothesis. The equivalence (1)-(5) in Theorem 1.1 is proved by showing each estimate forces boundedness of sup_X phi, which then triggers existing strong-compactness/regularity machinery, rather than being true by construction. The only load-bearing transfer is Theorem 2.6, which asserts that the arguments of [9, Theorem 4.6 and Theorem 4.11] 'carry over verbatim' to the twisted case because the potential equation is formally independent of beta. This is an external citation, not a self-citation, and it is a regularity-transfer step rather than an assumption whose conclusion equals its input. The legitimate concern is a proof-gap/correctness risk: the twisted a priori estimates are not written out and would need verification. That concern is not circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard pluripotential theory and on a small set of domain assumptions, chiefly the unproved carry-over of the twisted flow estimates and the applicability of the Trudinger inequality. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The twisted inverse MA flow exists for all times and the estimates from [9] hold for β≥0.
    Theorem 2.6 states the arguments from [9] 'carry over verbatim'; this is asserted, not proved, and is used throughout Sections 4-6.
  • domain assumption X is a compact Kähler manifold with c1(X)=[ω0]+[β] for a semipositive (1,1)-form β, and H^0(X,T^{1,0}X)=0.
    These are the standing hypotheses of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2; the no-vector-field condition enters the strong convergence and uniqueness argument in Proposition 4.1.
  • standard math The alpha-invariant inequality (Proposition 3.2) is valid along the flow, using monotonicity of the Mabuchi energy and the convexity of F.
    The proof uses the Jensen inequality, Lemma 3.1, and boundedness of M(φ(0))-M(φ); these are established in Section 2 and cited references.
  • domain assumption The Trudinger inequality from [20, Theorem 7] applies to flow solutions and yields (6.9): log ||u||_1 ≤ C∫(-ψ)ω_ψ^n + C.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.3 to control the L^1 norm of u = e^{-Bψ}; the paper invokes it without verifying that the flow's potentials satisfy the hypotheses of [20, Theorem 7].
  • standard math The effective semicontinuity theorem and Nadel vanishing theorem of Demailly-Kollár [15] apply to the limits ψ_∞.
    Used in Theorem 1.2 to pass from divergence of the integrals to properness of I(αψ_∞) and to obtain the cohomology vanishing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Convergence of the inverse Monge-Ampere flow and Nadel multiplier ideal sheaves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDOARBDP

@misc{pith2026241117978,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Convergence of the inverse Monge-Ampere flow and Nadel multiplier ideal sheaves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDOARBDP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17978}
}
abstract

We generalize the inverse Monge-Ampere flow, which was introduced in \cite{CHT17}, and provide conditions that guarantee the convergence of the flow without a priori assumption that $X$ has a K\"ahler-Einstein metric. We also show that if the underlying manifold does not admit K\"ahler-Einstein metric, then the flow develops Nadel multiplier ideal sheaves. In addition, we establish the linear lower bound for $\inf_X\varphi$, and the theorem of Darvas and He for the inverse Monge-Ampere flow.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    Differential Geom

    T.Collins, T.Hisamoto, R.Takahashi.The inverse Monge-Ampere flow and applications to K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics,J. Differential Geom. 120 (2022), no. 1, 51–95. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 21

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    R. J. Berman, S. Boucksom, P. Eyssidieux, V. Guedj, A. Zeriahi.K¨ ahler- Einstein metrics and the K¨ ahler-Ricci flow on log Fano varieties.J.Reine Angew. Math. 2019(751), 27-89. 2, 15

    work page 2019

  3. [20]

    B. Guo, D. H. Phong, F. Tong.OnL ∞-estimates for complex Monge-Amp` ere equations, Ann. of Math. (2) 198 (2023), no.1, 393–418. 24

    work page 2023

  4. [13]

    T.Darvas, W.He.Geodesic Rays and K¨ ahler-Ricci Trajectories on Fano Manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 7, 5069-5085 5, 25, 26, 27

    work page 2017

  5. [27]

    D.H.Phong, N.Sesum, J.Sturm,Multiplier ideal sheaves and the K¨ ahler- Ricci flow, Comm. Anal. Geom. 15 (2007), no. 3, 613–632. MR2379807, Zbl 1143.53064. 4, 5, 15

    work page arXiv 2007

  6. [29]

    Y.Rubinshtein.On the construction of Nadel multiplier ideal sheaves and the limiting behavior of the Ricci flow, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), 5839-5850. 4, 5, 11, 20 – 29 – Nikita Klemyatin

    work page 2009

  7. [1]

    Berman, B

    R.J. Berman, B. Berndtsson.Convexity of the K-energy on the space of K¨ ahler metrics.J. Amer.Math. Soc. 30 (2017), 1165-1196. 11

    work page 2017

  8. [3]

    R. J. Berman, S. Boucksom, M. Jonsson.A variational approach to the Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (2021), 605-652 2

    work page 2021

Show all 36 references
  1. [4]

    Berman, T

    R.J. Berman, T. Darvas and C.H. Lu.Convexity of the extended K-energy and the large time behavior of the weak Calabi flow.Geom. Topol. 21 (2017), 2945-2988. 11

    2017

  2. [5]

    Berndtsson,A Brunn-Minkowski type inequality for Fano manifolds and the Bando-Mabuchi uniqueness theorem, Invent

    B. Berndtsson,A Brunn-Minkowski type inequality for Fano manifolds and the Bando-Mabuchi uniqueness theorem, Invent. math. 200, 149–200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-014-0532-1 11, 15, 27

    2015 doi

  3. [6]

    Berndtsson,The openness conjecture for plurisubharmonic functions

    B. Berndtsson,The openness conjecture for plurisubharmonic functions. arXiv:1305.5781. 27 – 27 – Nikita Klemyatin

    arXiv

  4. [7]

    A symposium in honor of S

    E.Calabi,On K¨ ahler manifolds with vanishing canonical class.Algebraic geometry and topology. A symposium in honor of S. Lefschetz. Volume 12. 1957, pages 78–89. 1

    1957

  5. [8]

    X.X. Chen, B. Wang,Remarks on K¨ ahler Ricci flow, J. Geom. Anal. 20, 335–353 (2010) Zbl 1185.53075 MR 2579513 4, 11

    2010

  6. [10]

    Sz´ ekelyhidi

    T.Collins, G. Sz´ ekelyhidi. The twisted K¨ ahler–Ricci flow. Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), vol. 2016, no. 716, 2016, pp. 179-205. 2

    2016

  7. [11]

    T.Darvas.Weak geodesic rays in the space of K¨ ahler potentials and the class E(X, ω), J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 16 (2017), no. 4, 837-858. 25, 27

    2017

  8. [12]

    Darvas.The Mabuchi Geometry of Finite Energy Classes.Adv

    T. Darvas.The Mabuchi Geometry of Finite Energy Classes.Adv. Math. 285(2015), 182-219. 17

    2015

  9. [14]

    Datar, G

    V. Datar, G. Szekelyhidi.K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics along the smooth conti- nuity method.Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), 975-1010. 2

    2016

  10. [15]

    Demailly, J.Kollar.Semi-continuity of complex singularity exponents and K¨ ahler-Einsten metrics on Fano orbifoldsAnn

    J.-P. Demailly, J.Kollar.Semi-continuity of complex singularity exponents and K¨ ahler-Einsten metrics on Fano orbifoldsAnn. Sci.Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 34 (2001), no. 4, 522-556. 19, 21

    2001

  11. [16]

    Guan and X

    Q. Guan and X. Zhou.A proof of Demailly’s strong openness conjecture. Ann.of Math. (2) 182 (2015), no. 2, 605–616. 27

    2015

  12. [17]

    Zeriahi.The weighted Monge-Ampere energy of quasiplurisub- harmonic functions.J.Fucnt.Anal

    V.Guedj, A. Zeriahi.The weighted Monge-Ampere energy of quasiplurisub- harmonic functions.J.Fucnt.Anal. 250 (2007), no.2, 442-482. 14

    2007

  13. [18]

    Zeriahi.Degenerate Complex Monge-Ampere Equation.EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol.26, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2017

    V.Guedj, A. Zeriahi.Degenerate Complex Monge-Ampere Equation.EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol.26, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2017. 14 – 28 – Nikita Klemyatin

    2017

  14. [19]

    Guenancia, M

    H. Guenancia, M. PaunConic singularities metrics with prescribed Ricci curvature: general cone angles along normal crossing divisors.J. Diff. Geom. 103 (2016), 15-57. 2

    2016

  15. [21]

    Hisamoto,Geometric flow, Multiplier ideal sheaves and Optimal destabi- lizer for a Fano manifold, The Journal of Geometric Analysis 33 (2023)

    T. Hisamoto,Geometric flow, Multiplier ideal sheaves and Optimal destabi- lizer for a Fano manifold, The Journal of Geometric Analysis 33 (2023). 24, 25

    2023

  16. [22]

    Kolodziej,The complex Monge-Ampere equation

    S. Kolodziej,The complex Monge-Ampere equation. Acta Math. 180 (1998) 69-117

    1998

  17. [23]

    17(1976), no

    N.V.Krylov.Sequences of convex functions and estimates of the maximum of the solutions of a parabolic equationSibirsk.Math.Z. 17(1976), no. 2, 290- 303, 478. 4 6

    1976

  18. [24]

    A. M. Nadel,Multiplier ideal sheaves and K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics of positive scalar curvature, Annals of Mathematics 132 (1990), 549–596. 19

    1990

  19. [25]

    Phong, Jian Song, Jacob Sturm, Ben Weinkove,The Moser-Trudinger inequality on K¨ ahler-Einstein manifolds, Amer

    D.H. Phong, Jian Song, Jacob Sturm, Ben Weinkove,The Moser-Trudinger inequality on K¨ ahler-Einstein manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 130 (2008), no. 4, 1067-1085 4, 10, 14

    2008

  20. [26]

    Phong, J.Sturm,Algebraic estimates, stability of local zeta functions, and uniform estimates for distribution functionsAnn

    D.H. Phong, J.Sturm,Algebraic estimates, stability of local zeta functions, and uniform estimates for distribution functionsAnn. of Math. (2) 152 (2000), no. 1, 277-329 21

    2000

  21. [28]

    Szekelyhidi.Twisted K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics.Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 17(3), 1025-1044 2

    J.Ross, G. Szekelyhidi.Twisted K¨ ahler–Einstein metrics.Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 17(3), 1025-1044 2

  22. [30]

    G.Tian.On K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics on certain K¨ ahler manifolds with C1(M)>0, Invent. Math. 89 (1987), no. 2, 225–246. 11

    1987

  23. [31]

    B.Weinkove.Convergence of the J-flow on K¨ ahler surfacesComm. Anal. Geom. 12 (2004), No. 4, 949-965 24

    2004

  24. [32]

    Differential Geom

    B.Weinkove.On the J-flow in higher dimensions and the lower boundedness of the Mabuchi energy, J. Differential Geom. 73 (2006), no. 2, 351–358

    2006

  25. [33]

    M.XiaOn sharp lower bounds for Calabi type functionals and destabilizing properties of gradient flows, Analysis and PDE 14 (2021) 1951-1976 5, 21, 24

    2021

  26. [34]

    Yau.On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler manifold and the complex Monge–Ampere equation, I, Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 31(3):339–411, 1978

    S.-T. Yau.On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler manifold and the complex Monge–Ampere equation, I, Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 31(3):339–411, 1978. 1

    1978

  27. [35]

    K.Zhang.Continuity of delta invariants and twisted K¨ ahler–Einstein met- rics, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 388, 2021, 107888. 2, 15

    2021

  28. [36]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Zhou,Delta invariants of projective cones and projective bundles of Fano type.Math.Z. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-021- 02787-7. 2 Department of Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA nk2957@columbia.edu nklemyatin@math.columbia.edu – 30 –

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.