Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Geometric construction of Schur algebras

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that generalized Steinberg varieties carry convolution algebras isomorphic to ordinary and affine q-Schur algebras in every finite type.

desk verdict A serious, dense paper with a real advance and one genuinely underproved step (Proposition 5.11) that the authors should be asked to fix before this is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18273 v2 pith:WD3HRMQO submitted 2024-11-27 math.RT math.QA

Li Luo , Zheming Xu , Yang Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.QA MSC 20G4322E5720G42
keywords SchuralgebrasSteinbergvarietiesBorel-MoorehomologyequivariantK-theoryaffineq-Schurquasi-splitı-quantumgroupslocalgeometricLanglandscorrespondenceHoweduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that every generalized Schur algebra of any finite type can be built from the geometry of a single kind of variety, the generalized Steinberg variety. For a finite collection of Weyl-group orbits on the weight lattice, the top Borel-Moore homology of that variety, with convolution as multiplication, is the ordinary Schur algebra, while its equivariant K-group is the affine q-Schur algebra. This matters because earlier geometric constructions of Schur algebras existed mainly for type A; the uniform recipe covers all types and yields a Schur-algebra analogue of local geometric Langlands reciprocity, an equivariant K-theoretic realization of quasi-split affine ı-quantum groups of type AIII, and geometric Howe dualities for affine quantum groups.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized Steinberg variety $Z_f = \widetilde N_f \times_N \widetilde N_f$, whose irreducible components are the conormal bundles $T^*_{O_{\gamma,w,\nu}}$ to the $G$-orbits on $F_f \times F_f$. Convolution in Borel-Moore homology (Theorem 3.11) and in $\breve{G}$-equivariant $K$-theory (Theorem 5.21) gives the algebra structure. The companion variety $\widetilde N_f \times_N \widetilde N$ carries the Fock-space module $\widetilde T_f$ for the affine Hecke algebra, and the split injections $\iota_w$ of Proposition 5.11 supply the $R(\breve{G})$-basis of the filtration pieces that replaces the unavailable cellular-fibration lemma.

What would settle it

Compute $K^{\breve{G}}(Z_{\gamma\gamma})$ for $G=GL_3$ with $P_\gamma = B\{1,s_1\}B$ (the case in Example 5.10 where no cellular fibration exists). Corollary 5.6 predicts a free $R(\breve{G})$-module of rank $9$; an independent computation via $\breve{T}$-localization that yields any other rank falsifies Proposition 5.11 and Theorem 5.21. Alternatively, in the $SO_5$ specialization $Q_f = Q^{\imath}_2$, the convolution structure constants of $K^{\breve{G}}(Z_f)$ must match the known presentation of the affine $\imath$Schur algebra; any mismatch is a falsifier.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 5.21 asserts that for any finite $W$-invariant subset $Q_f$ of the weight lattice, the equivariant $K$-group $K^{\breve{G}}(Z_f)$ of the generalized Steinberg variety, with its convolution product, is isomorphic as an algebra to the affine $q$-Schur algebra $\widetilde S_f = \mathrm{End}_{\widetilde H}(\widetilde T_f)$. Theorem 3.11 is the classical-limit statement: the top Borel-Moore homology $H(Z_f)$ is isomorphic to $S_f = \mathrm{End}_{QW}(T_f)$. The proof avoids the missing cellular-fibration lemma by first identifying the Fock-space module $\widetilde T_f$ with $K^{\breve{G}}(\widetilde N_f \times_N \widetilde N)$ as an $\widetilde H$-module and then transferring the structure to $Z_f$; the $R(\breve{G})$-basis of each filtration piece is built from the split injections $\iota_w$ of Proposition 5.11.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each equivariant $K$-group in the filtration of $Z_{\gamma\nu}$ has the claimed $R(\breve{G})$-basis built from the split injections $\iota_w$; this is justified in the paper by a one-line induction, in a setting where the standard cellular-fibration lemma is known to fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the classical limit, the basis of $H(Z_f)$ given by fundamental classes of conormal bundles gives a direct geometric presentation of the Schur algebra $S_f$ of any type.
  • The equivariant $K$-theoretic realization identifies irreducible representations of affine $q$-Schur algebras with data attached to nilpotent orbits and component-group characters, extending the Springer-type classification beyond type A.
  • Choosing $Q_f$ as a single regular $W$-orbit recovers the known affine Hecke algebra realization, making the main theorem a Schur-algebra analogue of the local geometric Langlands correspondence.
  • Stabilizing the K-theoretic affine $q$-Schur algebras realizes quasi-split affine $\imath$-quantum groups of type AIII, including variants for which no explicit Drinfeld presentation is available.
  • At specializations in type A and type B/C, the double-centralizer property gives geometric Howe dualities between affine quantum groups of type A and between affine $\imath$-quantum groups of type AIII.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The module-first strategy, realizing the Fock space before the algebra, should transfer to asymptotic affine q-Schur algebras, where no equivariant K-theoretic description is currently known; the authors mention this as ongoing work.
  • If the basis in Proposition 5.11 can be made constructive, the main isomorphism would probably yield explicit convolution formulas for the affine $\imath$-quantum groups of type AIII, including the variants that still lack a Drinfeld-type presentation.
  • The theorem is stated for groups whose simple factors are simply connected or of type $SO_{2d+1}$; checking whether the same geometric construction works for adjoint exceptional groups would delimit the true scope of 'any type'.
  • In the three-parameter type-C setting, the same machinery should produce an exotic Steinberg realization of the three-parameter affine $\imath$-Schur algebras, mirroring the extension from the one-parameter affine Hecke algebra to the exotic type-C algebra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs generalized Steinberg varieties Z_f attached to finite W-invariant subsets of the weight lattice of a reductive group G, and proves two main structural results: Theorem 3.11, an isomorphism between the top Borel-Moore homology H(Z_f) and the Schur algebra S_f, and Theorem 5.21, an isomorphism between the equivariant K-group K^{Ĝ}(Z_f) and the affine q-Schur algebra ~S_f. The proof strategy for Theorem 5.21 goes through a Fock-space module ~T_f, realized as K^{Ĝ}(~N_f ×_N ~N), and then identifies the convolution algebra of Z_f with the endomorphism algebra of that module. The paper also derives applications: a Schur-algebra analogue of the local geometric Langlands correspondence, an equivariant K-theoretic realization of quasi-split affine ıquantum groups of type AIII (implicitly, via multiplication formulas from the authors' earlier work), and geometric Howe dualities.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper gives a genuinely uniform geometric construction of Schur algebras and affine q-Schur algebras for all types, reaching beyond the previously known type-A and type-C cases and recovering the affine Hecke algebra realization as the special case of a single regular W-orbit. The applications are substantial: a Langlands-type reciprocity for generalized Schur algebras, a new route to affine ıquantum groups, and Howe dualities at the level of equivariant K-theory. The paper has clear strengths: the Borel-Moore homology part is supported by explicit upper-triangular formulas and dimension counts (Theorem 3.11), the results are checked against the independent Ginzburg realization of affine Hecke algebras (Theorem 5.12), and there are no fitted parameters or ad hoc axioms. The main gap is concentrated in one proof: Proposition 5.11, on which the rank computation and the injectivity argument of Theorem 5.21 rest, is asserted in a single sentence without establishing the required splitting.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.7, Proposition 5.11] The proof of Proposition 5.11 is one sentence ('The statements can be proved by induction on w') and does not establish the claimed R(Ĝ)-basis of K^{Ĝ}(Z^{≼w}_{γν}). The preceding paragraph asserts a 'split R(Ĝ)-homomorphism' K^{Ĝ}(T^*_{O_{γ,w,ν}}) → K^{Ĝ}(T^*_{γ,w,ν}) but gives no section and no verification that the quotient maps in the exact sequences of Lemma 5.5 split. This is load-bearing: R(Ĝ) is generally not a PID, so freeness of the submodule and of the graded pieces does not force freeness of the middle term, and the standard splitting mechanism, Lemma 5.3, is explicitly unavailable for general γ,ν, as Example 5.10 shows (for G=GL_n, P_γ=B⟨1,s_1⟩B, and w=s_2 with s_1w≠ws_1, the relevant fiber is a disjoint union of two cells). Since Corollary 5.6 and the injectivity step of Theorem 5.21(2) both depend on this basis, a complete proof of Proposition 5.11, or a precise citation to a result that supplies it, is necessary.
  2. [§5.12, Theorem 5.21(2)] The injectivity argument for ~ψ uses Proposition 5.11 to expand a nonzero element M ∈ K^{Ĝ}(Z_f) as M ∈ χ^w_{γν} + K^{Ĝ}(Z^{≺w}_{γν}) and then applies Lemma 5.20 to obtain a nonzero restriction. If the basis assertion of Proposition 5.11 is not available, this expansion and the subsequent rank comparison via Corollary 5.6 fail. The final Cartesian-square argument that identifies End_{R(Ĝ)}(~T_f) ∩ K^{Ĝ}(Z_f)_{loc} with K^{Ĝ}(Z_f) also uses the same freeness/basis structure. The theorem is the central equivariant K-theoretic claim of the paper, so the proof needs to be completed at this point rather than deferred to an induction statement.
  3. [§5.4 and abstract/introduction] The statement 'we provide the geometric construction of a series of generalized Schur algebras of any type' is stronger than what the K-theoretic part proves as written. Section 5.4 assumes that G is connected reductive and that each simple factor of its derived subgroup is simply connected or of type SO_{2d+1}. While this may cover all Weyl types by passing to simply connected covers, the abstract and Theorem 7.1 should state the assumption explicitly, especially because the Langlands-dual formulation in Theorem 7.1 inherits it. Please add a sentence in the introduction and in Theorem 7.1 specifying the class of groups for which the equivariant K-theoretic and Langlands-reciprocity results are proved.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.3 and §5.9] The word 'Cartisian' appears in the headings and text of Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 5.14; it should be 'Cartesian'.
  2. [§7.3.1] The text 'Fork space ~Tf' appears to be a typo for 'Fock space ~Tf'.
  3. [§1.5 and References] The citation '[FL3W220]' in §1.5 does not match the reference list entry '[FL3W20]'; please correct the tag and check the year consistency.
  4. [§7.4.2, Theorem 7.5 remark] The phrase 'replace U(gl_m) by U(sl_m) (resp, U(gl_n))' is unclear; presumably it should read 'replace U(gl_m) by U(sl_m) (resp. U(gl_n) by U(sl_n))'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the main isomorphisms are substantive and cross-checked against independent external results.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (Theorem 3.11 and Theorem 5.21) are proved by constructing explicit convolution-algebra homomorphisms and comparing ranks and bases. The target algebras Sf and ~Sf are defined combinatorially as endomorphism algebras (End_QW(Tf) and End_{~H}(~Tf)), not in terms of the geometric objects Zf or ~Nf, so the isomorphisms H(Zf) ≅ Sf and K^{˘G}(Zf) ≅ ~Sf carry genuine content rather than being definitional. Theorem 5.12 invokes Ginzburg's independent realization of affine Hecke algebras, and the type A/C specializations in Section 7.1 match known results, providing external consistency checks. The proof of Proposition 5.11 is compressed to a one-sentence induction, and Corollary 5.6's freeness assertion is terse; this is a proof-detail or correctness-risk issue, not circularity, because the claimed bases are not defined in terms of the target isomorphism and the argument is logically prior to Theorem 5.21. Application II transparently states that multiplication formulas for affine ıquantum groups are imported from the authors' earlier work [FL3W23] rather than derived from the K-theoretic construction; this is self-citation, but [FL3W23] is an independent published BLM-type realization with stated assumptions that do not include the target K-theoretic result, so it counts as real evidence rather than a circular step. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, and no displayed equation reduces to its own input by construction. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorems rest on standard geometric representation theory and on two domain assumptions: G has simply connected or SO_{2d+1} simple factors (§5.4), and Qf is a finite W-invariant subset with a regular orbit for classification. No numerical free parameters are fitted; q is an indeterminate. The new geometric object Zf is explicitly constructed from standard flag varieties and nilpotent cones, not postulated ad hoc.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Borel-Moore homology, equivariant K-theory, convolution, localization, Thom isomorphism, and Künneth formulas are used as in Chriss-Ginzburg [CG97].
    Invoked repeatedly, for example in Sections 3.2, 5.1, Lemma 5.3, and Proposition 6.3.
  • standard math Pittie-Steinberg theorem: for a parabolic P, R(P) is isomorphic to R(T)^{W'} and is free over R(G).
    Used in Lemma 5.4 and in the basis and rank computations of Sections 5.7 and 5.12.
  • domain assumption The derived subgroup of G has simple factors that are simply connected or of type SO_{2d+1}.
    Stated at the start of Section 5.4; it restricts the 'any type' claim and feeds the freeness of equivariant K-groups.
  • domain assumption Qf is a finite W-invariant subset of the weight or coweight lattice; for classification results Λf contains a regular W-orbit.
    Defines the generalized flag variety, Steinberg variety, and Fock space; Theorem 6.8 explicitly requires a regular orbit.
  • standard math Howlett's theorem on longest double coset representatives and the Bruhat closure relations (Lemma 2.6) are used in the multiplication formulas.
    Used in Propositions 3.6, 3.8 and Lemma 3.7 to determine leading terms of convolutions.
  • standard math The equivariant BBDG decomposition theorem applies to the projective morphisms πf and πf^a for the perverse sheaf decompositions.
    Used in Theorem 4.12 and Section 6.4 to decompose direct images into intersection cohomology complexes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric construction of Schur algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WD3HRMQO

@misc{pith2026241118273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric construction of Schur algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WD3HRMQO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18273}
}
abstract

We provide the geometric construction of a series of generalized Schur algebras of any type via Borel-Moore homologies and equivariant K-groups of generalized Steinberg varieties. As applications, we obtain a Schur algebra analogue of the local geometric Langlands correspondence of any type, provide an equivariant K-theoretic realization of quasi-split $\imath$quantum groups of affine type AIII, and establish a geometric Howe duality for affine ($\imath$-)quantum groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bezrukavnikov, On two geometric realizations of an affine Hecke algebra , Publ

    R. Bezrukavnikov, On two geometric realizations of an affine Hecke algebra , Publ. Math. IHES 123 (2016), 1--67

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    H. Bao, J. Kujawa, Y. Li, and W. Wang, Geometric Schur duality of classical type , Transform. Groups 23 (2018), 329--389

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Beilinson, G

    A. Beilinson, G. Lusztig and R. MacPherson, A geometric setting for the quantum deformation of GL_n , Duke Math. J. 61 (1990), 655--677

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Bezrukavnikov, I

    R. Bezrukavnikov, I. Karpov and V. krylov, A geometric realization of the asymptotic affine Hecke algebra , arXiv:2312.10582

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Borel and J

    A. Borel and J. Tits, Groupes r\'eductifs , Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 27 (1965), 55--151

    work page 1965

  6. [6]

    Bao and W

    H. Bao and W. Wang, A new approach to Kazhdan-Lusztig theory of type B via quantum symmetric pairs , Asterisque 402 (2018), vii+134 pp

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Chriss and V

    N. Chriss and V. Ginzburg, Representation theory and complex geometry , Birkh\"auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1997. x+495 pp

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    W. Cui, L. Luo and W. Wang, Cells in affine q -Schur algebras , Israel J. Math. 263 (2024), 129--167

    work page 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    W. Cui, L. Luo and Z. Xu, Asymptotic Schur algebras and cellularity of q -Schur algebras , arXiv:2305.14633. 28 pp

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    B. Deng, J. Du, B. Parshall and J. Wang, Finite dimensional algebras and quantum groups, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 150 , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    Du and Q

    J. Du and Q. Fu, Quantum affine gl _n via Hecke algebras , Adv. Math. 282 (2015), 23--46

    2015

  4. [12]

    Dipper and G

    R. Dipper and G. James, The q -Schur algebra , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 59 (1989), 23--50

    1989

  5. [13]

    Dipper, G

    R. Dipper, G. James and A. Mathas, The (Q, q) -Schur algebra , Proc. London Math. Soc. 77 (1998), 327--361

    1998

  6. [14]

    Du and L

    J. Du and L. Scott, The q -Schur ^2 algebra , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000), 4325--4353

    2000

  7. [15]

    Fulton, Young Tableaux

    W. Fulton, Young Tableaux. With Applications to Representation Theory and Geometry , London Mathematical Society Student Texts 35 , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

    1997

  8. [16]

    Z. Fan, C. Lai, Y. Li, L. Luo and W. Wang, Affine flag varieties and quantum symmetric pairs , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 265 (2020), no. 1285, v+123 pp

    2020

  9. [17]

    Z. Fan, C. Lai, Y. Li, L. Luo and W. Wang, Affine Hecke algebras and quantum symmetric pairs , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 281 (2023), no. 1386, ix+92 pp

    2023

  10. [18]

    Z. Fan, C. Lai, Y. Li, L. Luo, W. Wang and H. Watanabe, Quantum Schur duality of affine type C with three parameters , Math. Res. Lett. 27 (2020), 79--114

    2020

  11. [19]

    Z. Fan, H. Ma and H. Xiao, Equivariant K-theory approach to -quantum groups , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 58 (2022), 635--668

    2022

  12. [20]

    Ginzburg, g -Modules, Springer's representations and bivariant Chern classes , Adv

    V. Ginzburg, g -Modules, Springer's representations and bivariant Chern classes , Adv. Math. 61 (1986), 1--48

    1986

  13. [21]

    Lagrangian

    V. Ginzburg, “Lagrangian” construction for representations of Hecke algebras , Adv. Math. 63 (1987), 100--112

    1987

  14. [22]

    Ginzburg, Lagrangian construction of the enveloping algebra U( sl _n) , C.R

    V. Ginzburg, Lagrangian construction of the enveloping algebra U( sl _n) , C.R. Acad. Sci. 312 (1991), 907--912

    1991

  15. [23]

    V. Ginzburg, Geometric methods in the representation theory of Hecke algebras and quantum groups , Representation theories and algebraic geometric (Montreal, PQ, 1997), 127--183, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., 514 , Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1998

    1997

  16. [24]

    Graham and G.I

    J.J. Graham and G.I. Lehrer, Cellular algebras , Invent. math. 123 (1996), 1--34

    1996

  17. [25]

    Green, Hyperoctahedral Schur algebras , J

    R.M. Green, Hyperoctahedral Schur algebras , J. Algebra 192 (1997), 418--438

    1997

  18. [26]

    Ginzburg and E

    V. Ginzburg and E. Vasserot, Langlands reciprocity for affine quantum groups of type A_n , Int. Math. Res. Not. (1993), 67--85

    1993

  19. [27]

    Iwahori and H

    N. Iwahori and H. Matsumoto, On some Bruhat decomposition and the structure of the Hecke rings of p -adic Chevalley groups , Publ. Math. IHES 25 (1965) 5--48

    1965

  20. [28]

    Jantzen, Representations of algebraic groups , Second edition, Math

    J. Jantzen, Representations of algebraic groups , Second edition, Math. Surveys Monogr., 107 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. xiv+576 pp

    2003

  21. [29]

    Kato, An exotic Deligne-Langlands correspondence for symplectic groups , Duke Math

    S. Kato, An exotic Deligne-Langlands correspondence for symplectic groups , Duke Math. J. 148 (2009), 305--371

    2009

  22. [30]

    Kazhdan and G

    D. Kazhdan and G. Lusztig, Equivariant K-theory and representations of Hecke algebras. II , Invent. Math. 80 (1985), 209--231

    1985

  23. [31]

    Kazhdan and G

    D. Kazhdan and G. Lusztig, Proof of the Deligne-Langlands conjecture for Hecke algebras , Invent. Math. 87 (1987), 153--215

    1987

  24. [32]

    Kashiwara and T

    M. Kashiwara and T. Tanisaki, The characteristic cycles of holonomic systems on a flag manifold , Invent. Math. 77 (1984), 185--198

    1984

  25. [33]

    Kolb, Quantum symmetric Kac-Moody pairs , Adv

    S. Kolb, Quantum symmetric Kac-Moody pairs , Adv. Math. 267 (2014), 395--469,

    2014

  26. [34]

    Kumar, Geometry of Schubert varieties and Demazure character formula , unpublished lecture notes

    S. Kumar, Geometry of Schubert varieties and Demazure character formula , unpublished lecture notes

  27. [35]

    Li, Quasi-split symmetric pairs of U( sl _n) and Steinberg varieties of classical type , Represent

    Y. Li, Quasi-split symmetric pairs of U( sl _n) and Steinberg varieties of classical type , Represent. Theory 25 (2021), 903--934

    2021

  28. [36]

    Lai and L

    C. Lai and L. Luo, Schur algebras and quantum symmetric pairs with unequal parameters , Int. Math. Res. Not. 2021 (2021), no. 13, 10207--10259

    2021

  29. [37]

    Lusztig, Equivariant K-theory and representations of Hecke algebras , Proc

    G. Lusztig, Equivariant K-theory and representations of Hecke algebras , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1985), 337--342

    1985

  30. [38]

    Lusztig, Bases in equivariant K -theory , Represent

    G. Lusztig, Bases in equivariant K -theory , Represent. Theory 2 (1998), 298--369

    1998

  31. [39]

    Lusztig, Aperiodicity in quantum affine gl _n , Asian J

    G. Lusztig, Aperiodicity in quantum affine gl _n , Asian J. Math. 3 (1999), 2147--177

    1999

  32. [40]

    Lusztig, Bases in equivariant K -theory II , Represent

    G. Lusztig, Bases in equivariant K -theory II , Represent. Theory 3 (1999), 281--353

    1999

  33. [41]

    Luo and W

    L. Luo and W. Wang, The q -Schur algebras and q -Schur dualities of finite type , J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 21 (2022), 129--160

    2022

  34. [42]

    M. Lu, W. Wang and W. Zhang, Braid group action and quasi-split affine ıquantum groups II: higher rank , Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), Paper No. 142

    2024

  35. [43]

    Luo and Z

    L. Luo and Z. Xu, Geometric Howe dualities of finite type , Adv. Math. 410 (2022), Paper No. 108751

    2022

  36. [44]

    L. Luo, Z. Xu and Y. Yang, Equivariant K-theoretic construction of affine q -Schur algebras with unequal parameters , preparing

  37. [45]

    Maxim, Intersection homology & perverse sheaves , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 281

    L. Maxim, Intersection homology & perverse sheaves , Graduate Texts in Mathematics 281. Springer, Cham, 2019, xv+270 pp

    2019

  38. [46]

    Nakajima, Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras , Duke Math

    H. Nakajima, Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras , Duke Math. J. 91 (1998), no.3, 515--560

    1998

  39. [47]

    Qiu and N

    Y. Qiu and N. Xi, The based rings of two-sided cells in an affine Weyl group of type B _3 , I , Sci. China Mathematics 66 (2023), no.2, 221--236

    2023

  40. [48]

    Sauter, A survey on Springer Theory , arXiv:1307.0973

    J. Sauter, A survey on Springer Theory , arXiv:1307.0973. 33 pp

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Springer, Trigonometric sums, Green functions of finite groups and representations of Weyl groups , Invent

    T.A. Springer, Trigonometric sums, Green functions of finite groups and representations of Weyl groups , Invent. Math. 36 (1976), 173--207

    1976

  42. [50]

    Steinberg, On a theorem of Pittie , Topology 14 (1975), 173–177

    R. Steinberg, On a theorem of Pittie , Topology 14 (1975), 173–177

    1975

  43. [51]

    Su and W

    C. Su and W. Wang, Affine quantum groups and Steinberg Varieties of type C , arXiv:2407.06865

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Vasserot, Affine quantum groups and equivariant K-theory , Transform

    E. Vasserot, Affine quantum groups and equivariant K-theory , Transform. Groups 3 (1998), 269--299

    1998

  45. [53]

    Varagnolo and E

    M. Varagnolo and E. Vasserot, Canonical bases and Lusztig conjecture for quantized SL(N) at roots of unity , arXiv:9803023v1

  46. [54]

    Varagnolo and E

    M. Varagnolo and E. Vasserot, On the decomposition matrices of the quantized Schur algebra , Duke Math. J. 100 (1999), 267--297

    1999

  47. [55]

    Wang, Lagrangian construction of the ( gl _n, gl _m) -duality , Commun

    W. Wang, Lagrangian construction of the ( gl _n, gl _m) -duality , Commun. Contemp. Math. 3 (2001), 201--214

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.