Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Robust dark-field signal extraction for modulation-based X-ray tensor tomography

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A weighted least-squares fit makes speckle-based X-ray tensor tomography numerically stable and yields the first 3D reconstruction of fiber orientation from random diffusers.

desk verdict A useful, visually convincing methods paper that overclaims numerical guarantees; the first speckle-based tensor tomography, but the linearization and weighting scheme need quantitative checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18482 v1 pith:55TZQLAD submitted 2024-11-27 physics.app-ph physics.optics

Ginevra Lautizi , Vittorio Di Trapani , Alain Studer , Marie-Christine Zdora , Fabio De Marco , Jisoo Kim , Federica Marone , Marco Stampanoni
show 1 more author
Pierre Thibault
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords X-raytensortomographyspeckle-basedimagingdirectionaldark-fieldweightedleastsquarescarbonfibercompositeswavefrontmodulationsignalextraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates that a weighted linear least-squares extraction of the directional dark-field signal overcomes the numerical instability that previously plagued speckle-based X-ray tensor tomography (XTT) with random diffusers. The method models the local scattering as an anisotropic Gaussian and solves a log-linearized least-squares problem, using weights that suppress unstable regions where the measured Fourier intensity is near zero. The authors validate the approach on several carbon fiber composites, showing robust 2D orientation maps, and they present the first reconstruction of an X-ray speckle-based tensor tomogram. If correct, the method makes directional dark-field extraction practical for non-periodic wavefront modulators and opens speckle-based XTT to broader laboratory use.

What carries the argument

The central object is the weighted linear least-squares problem of Eq. (3), derived by log-linearizing the nonlinear least-squares fit of the scattering model $I_s^j(k) = e^{-f(k)} I_0^j(k)$ near its optimum. The weights $W_k^j = w_k^j |I_s^j(k)|^2$ are the load-bearing mechanism: they automatically down-weight Fourier components where the measured sample intensity is small, which is exactly where the direct logarithmic ratio becomes numerically unstable. Solving this linear system for the parameters of $f(k) = \mu + \tfrac12(a k_x^2 + b k_y^2 + c k_x k_y)$ yields the 2D scattering tensor for each local analysis window, and eigendecomposition of that tensor gives the mean scattering, the fractional anisotropy, and the preferred fiber orientation.

What would settle it

Measure a phantom with two fiber bundles crossing at 90 degrees within a single 6×6-pixel analysis window; if the extraction returns a single averaged orientation rather than two distinct populations, the single-Gaussian model is the limiting assumption and the tomographic reconstruction will be biased where multiple orientations overlap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the weighted linear least-squares formulation of Eq. (3) — minimizing $\sum_{j,k} W_k^j | f - \ln(I_0^j(k)/I_s^j(k)) |^2$ with weights $W_k^j \propto |I_s^j(k)|^2$ — provides the numerical stability required to extract the 2D scattering tensor from speckle data acquired with a random diffuser. Where the naive logarithm $f = -\ln(I_s/I_0)$ diverges or becomes unstable, the weighting suppresses contributions from near-zero spectral components, allowing a robust fit of the parameters $\mu, a, b, c$ that define the anisotropic Gaussian scattering model. This stability is what enabled the first experimental reconstruction of X-ray speckle-based tensor tomography, demonstrated on a carbon-fiber rod sample using a stair-wise acquisition protocol over tilt angles $\beta$ from 0° to 40°.

Load-bearing premise

The forward model assumes that each small 6×6-pixel analysis window contains exactly one dominant scattering orientation, so a single anisotropic Gaussian describes the local dark-field signal, and that the residuals near the optimum are small enough for the log-linearization to be valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Speckle-based tensor tomography becomes a practical modality with random diffusers, removing the need for precisely fabricated periodic gratings.
  • The extraction method is independent of the experimental geometry and wavefront marker, so it can be adapted to other non-periodic modulators and acquisition schemes.
  • Because speckle-based imaging already works with laboratory sources, the method plausibly extends XTT to lab-based setups, reaching a broader community.
  • The robustness improvement directly reduces noise in the extracted dark-field images compared with the earlier reconstruction method on the same samples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same weighted least-squares formulation could be extended to a mixture of two anisotropic Gaussian scattering components per window, directly addressing the stated limitation that a single orientation is extracted per analysis window.
  • Because the method does not assume periodicity, it should transfer to other stochastic wavefront markers such as membranes, biological diffusers, or even self-assembled nanostructured films, where grating-based approaches fail.
  • Replacing the diffuser-stepping acquisition with sample-scanning, as the authors plan, would trade the 20-fold acquisition overhead for a larger field of view and shorter total scan time, while keeping the same extraction pipeline.
  • The linearized solution could serve as a warm start for a full nonlinear least-squares refinement, potentially recovering accurate tensors in regions where the small-residual assumption behind log-linearization breaks down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a robust extraction method for the directional X-ray dark-field signal in modulation-based imaging. Within each local analysis window, the sample is modeled in Fourier space as multiplying the reference speckle spectrum by an anisotropic Gaussian factor exp(-f(k)) with f(k) = mu + (a kx^2 + b ky^2 + c kx ky)/2. The authors replace the numerically unstable per-frame log-ratio by a weighted linear least-squares problem (Eq. 3) obtained after a logarithmic linearization of the nonlinear objective (Eq. 2), with weights proportional to the measured sample spectrum intensity |I_s|^2. The method is demonstrated on four carbon-fiber/glass-fiber samples, including the first reported X-ray speckle-based tensor tomography reconstruction (Fig. 5). The paper claims that the weighted formulation guarantees numerical stability and that the method is adaptable to different wavefront modulators.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides a practical solution to a known instability in speckle-based directional dark-field extraction and lowers the implementation barrier for tensor tomography with random diffusers, which are simpler than periodic gratings and potentially compatible with laboratory sources. The 3D reconstruction in Fig. 5 is a useful proof of concept, and the linear least-squares form makes the method easy to implement. The strengths are the clear formulation of the forward model, the explicit treatment of the logarithm instability, and the comparison with an earlier approach on one sample. However, the claimed guaranteed stability is not established by the presented mathematics or validation: the evidence is qualitative, the linearization and weighting bias trade-off are unquantified, and the acknowledged single-orientation-per-window limitation is not exercised by the validation samples.

major comments (3)
  1. [Signal extraction, Eq. (2)-(3)] The transition from the nonlinear objective (2) to the linear objective (3) is presented as a logarithmic linearization 'close to the optimum', but the conditions for this approximation are not given and are not checked. The equivalence requires |f(k)-ln(I_0/I_s)| << 1 for every contributing pair (j,k), i.e. small residuals in Eq. (2). For a random diffuser, I_0 has deep nulls; near these nulls the log-ratio is dominated by noise and is not small, so Eq. (3) is not a controlled first-order approximation of Eq. (2). The weights W_j^k = w_j^k |I_s(k)|^2 suppress those unstable components, which is a sensible regularization, but they also downweight the high-frequency components where the curvature terms (a,b,c) of the anisotropic Gaussian are encoded, because strong scattering reduces |I_s|. The result can be a stable estimator that is biased toward the constant term mu. The paper reports no residuals of Eq. (2) at the Eq. (3) solution, no condition numbers of the weighted design matrix, and no comparison with a nonlinear minimizer or an iterative reweighted scheme. Please add at least one of these diagnostics, or a simulation with a known scattering tensor, to substantiate the 'guaranteed numerical stability' claim.
  2. [Results, Figs. 2-5] The central robustness claim is supported only by qualitative visual agreement with known sample geometry. There is no quantitative metric, such as the angular error of the reconstructed orientation relative to the known fiber directions, the dispersion of eigenvalues in nominally uniform regions, or a comparison against a ground-truth tensor phantom. The 3D reconstruction in Fig. 5 relies on user-chosen masking and glue segmentation, so the displayed agreement does not by itself quantify reconstruction accuracy. The authors also fix the analysis window at 6x6 pixels and do not report how the results depend on this parameter or on the statistical weights w_j^k. Since the title and abstract promise a robust method, the validation should include at least one quantitative assessment, ideally on simulated data with known f(k) or on a sample with a known orientation map.
  3. [Conclusions, last paragraph] The authors acknowledge that the model extracts a single orientation per analysis window. This limitation is load-bearing for the claim that the method is a versatile tool for tensor tomography, because real fiber composites often contain crossing or overlapping fiber populations within one resolution cell. The 2D test in Fig. 4 shows low anisotropy in the crossing regions, which is the expected averaging behaviour, but it does not validate the reconstruction in mixed-orientation voxels, and the 3D sample in Fig. 5 consists of four rods with uniform internal orientations. The limitation should be stated more prominently (e.g., in the abstract or the opening of the results section), and a test case with two orientations in a single window would materially strengthen the paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3) and surrounding text] The notation is inconsistent: the text defines W_j^k = w_j^k |I_s(k)|^2 but then writes W_k in Eq. (3); please use consistent subscripts and superscripts.
  2. [Signal extraction, text near Eq. (3)] There is a typo in the sentence preceding Eq. (3): 'using exist?.ing routines' should read 'using existing routines'; there are also stray '?' characters in the Fig. 2 caption.
  3. [Reference 20] The journal name 'Opticts Express' should be 'Optics Express'.
  4. [Results, tensor eigendecomposition] The phrase 'the eigenvector with the shortest length' should be 'the eigenvector associated with the smallest eigenvalue' to avoid implying that eigenvectors have a length.
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] The color-ball orientation mapping in Fig. 5d is not defined quantitatively; a short explanation of how RGB color maps to 3D orientation would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the weighted least-squares extraction is a direct fit of the anisotropic Gaussian scattering model to measured Fourier magnitudes, and the reconstructed fiber orientations are validated against known sample geometry; the self-citation to Ref. 28 is a baseline comparison, not a load-bearing premise.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Equation (1) states a forward model in which the local dark-field signal is an anisotropic Gaussian, f(k) = mu + (a kx^2 + b ky^2 + c kx ky)/2, multiplied by the reference speckle spectrum. Equations (2) and (3) define the estimator: the weighted least-squares objective is obtained by a first-order expansion of the nonlinear residual about the optimum, giving a linear regression of the measured log-ratios ln(I0/Is) onto the basis functions 1, kx^2, ky^2, and kx ky, with weights |I_s|^2. This is an estimation procedure, not a prediction from a fitted constant: the extracted 2D scattering tensor is the fit itself, and the 3D tensor tomogram is a standard tomographic combination of these per-projection fits. Validation relies on the known fiber orientations of carbon- and glass-fiber composites, which is an external benchmark. The self-citation to Ref. 28 appears as a baseline comparison and as a reference for combining 2D tensors into a tensor sinogram; the claimed numerical stability of the new method is argued from the explicit |I_s|^2 weights, not from Ref. 28. The acknowledged single-orientation limitation and the unquantified linearization error are correctness concerns, not circularity. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Gaussian forward model, the log-linearization, and the inherited reconstruction pipeline; the only hand-chosen processing parameter is the window size, and the weighting scheme is underspecified. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • analysis window size = 6 x 6 pixels
    Chosen as a compromise between spatial resolution and noise; the paper states it is a good compromise, but no systematic study of its effect on the extracted tensor is shown.
  • statistical weights w_k = unspecified
    Eq. (3) defines W_k = w_k |I_s|^2, but the paper does not state what w_k was set to in the experiments; if w_k were chosen per dataset, that is a fitted choice.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The sample intensity in each window obeys I_s^j(k) = e^{-f(k)} I_0^j(k) with f a quadratic polynomial in k (Eq. 1)
    This Gaussian scattering model is a first-order approximation of small-angle scattering; it breaks when multiple orientations or strong scattering gradients are present, as the authors acknowledge for multi-orientation windows.
  • standard math The log-linearized problem in Eq. (3) is a good approximation to the original nonlinear least-squares problem close to the optimum
    The linearization is a Taylor expansion valid for small residuals; the paper does not quantify how close to the optimum the solution must be for the approximation to be accurate.
  • domain assumption The 2D scattering tensors from all projections can be combined into a 3D tensor field using the reconstruction protocol of ref. 28
    The paper relies on its prior reconstruction framework without deriving it; the masking and segmentation steps are applied to clean up the volume.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust dark-field signal extraction for modulation-based X-ray tensor tomography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/55TZQLAD

@misc{pith2026241118482,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust dark-field signal extraction for modulation-based X-ray tensor tomography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/55TZQLAD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18482}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate a robust signal extraction method for X-ray speckle-based tensor tomography. We validate the effectiveness of the method for several carbon fiber composites, highlighting its potential for industrial applications. The proposed method can be adapted to various acquisition schemes and wavefront-marking optical elements, making it a versatile and robust tool for X-ray scattering tensor tomography.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18482 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a shows one of the 20 frames that form the complete dataset. The extracted absorption and scattering strength are displayed in 2b–c. In the latter, we see that beyond the strong scattering by the sharp edges, a clear scattering signal is also recorded within the sample itself. These two images corre￾spond to the conventional, non-directional analysis generally obtained with SBI. Fig. 2d shows the full scattering ten… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pfeiffer , author M

    author author F. Pfeiffer , author M. Bech , author O. Bunk , author P. Kraft , author E. F. \ Eikenberry , author C. Brönnimann , author C. Grünzweig ,\ and\ author C. David ,\ title title Hard-x-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer , \ @noop journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 7 ,\ pages 134--137 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Olivo ,\ title title Edge-illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging , \ @noop journal journal J

    author author A. Olivo ,\ title title Edge-illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging , \ @noop journal journal J. Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 33 ,\ pages 363002 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    David , author B

    author author C. David , author B. Nöhammer , author H. H. \ Solak ,\ and\ author E. Ziegler ,\ title title Differential x-ray phase contrast imaging using a shearing interferometer , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 81 ,\ pages 3287--3289 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Momose , author S

    author author A. Momose , author S. Kawamoto , author I. Koyama , author Y. Hamaishi , author K. Takai ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ title title Demonstration of x-ray talbot interferometry , \ @noop journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 42 ,\ pages L866 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    author author K. S. \ Morgan , author D. M. \ Paganin ,\ and\ author K. K. W. \ Siu ,\ title title X-ray phase imaging with a paper analyzer , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 100 ,\ pages 124102 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Berujon , author H

    author author S. Berujon , author H. Wang ,\ and\ author K. Sawhney ,\ title title X-ray multimodal imaging using a random-phase object , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 86 ,\ pages 063813 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Zanette , author M

    author author I. Zanette , author M. C. \ Zdora , author A. B. \ T. Zhou , author D. H. \ Larsson , author P. Thibault , author H. Hertz ,\ and\ author F. Pfeiffer ,\ title title X-ray microtomography using correlation of near-field speckles for material characterization , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unit...

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    author author M.-C. \ Zdora ,\ title title State of the art of x-ray speckle-based phase-contrast and dark-field imaging , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Imaging \ volume 4 ,\ pages 60 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Zhou , author H

    author author T. Zhou , author H. Wang ,\ and\ author K. Sawhney ,\ title title Single-shot x-ray dark-field imaging with omnidirectional sensitivity using random-pattern wavefront modulator , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 113 ,\ pages 091102 ( year ...

    2018

  2. [10]

    author author M. C. \ Zdora ,\ @noop title X-ray phase-contrast imaging using near-field speckles \ ( publisher Springer Cham ,\ year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  3. [11]

    De Marco , author S

    author author F. De Marco , author S. Savatović , author R. Smith , author V. Di Trapani , author M. Margini , author G. Lautizi ,\ and\ author P. Thibault ,\ title title High-speed processing of x-ray wavefront marking data with the unified modulated pattern analysis (umpa) m...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Schaff , author M

    author author F. Schaff , author M. Bech , author P. Zaslansky , author C. Jud , author M. Liebi , author M. Guizar-Sicairos ,\ and\ author F. Pfeiffer ,\ title title Six-dimensional real and reciprocal space small-angle x-ray scattering tomography , \ @noop journal journal Na...

    2015

  5. [13]

    Liebi , author M

    author author M. Liebi , author M. Georgiadis , author A. Menzel , author P. Schneider , author J. Kohlbrecher , author O. Bunk ,\ and\ author M. Guizar-Sicairos ,\ title title Nanostructure surveys of macroscopic specimens by small-angle scattering tensor tomography , \ @noop...

    2015

  6. [14]

    author author T. H. \ Jensen , author M. Bech , author O. Bunk , author T. Donath , author C. David , author R. Feidenhans'l ,\ and\ author F. Pfeiffer ,\ title title Directional x-ray dark-field imaging , \ @noop journal journal Physics in Medicine & Biology \ volume 55 ,\ pa...

    2010

  7. [15]

    Wang , author Y

    author author H. Wang , author Y. Kashyap ,\ and\ author K. Sawhney ,\ title title Hard-x-ray directional dark-field imaging using the speckle scanning technique , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 114 ,\ pages 103901 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  8. [16]

    Kagias , author Z

    author author M. Kagias , author Z. Wang , author P. Villanueva-Perez , author K. Jefimovs ,\ and\ author M. Stampanoni ,\ title title 2d-omnidirectional hard-x-ray scattering sensitivity in a single shot , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 116 ,\ pages ...

    2016

  9. [17]

    author author K. M. \ Pavlov , author D. M. \ Paganin , author K. S. \ Morgan , author H. T. \ Li , author S. Berujon , author L. Qu\'enot ,\ and\ author E. Brun ,\ title title Directional dark-field implicit x-ray speckle tracking using an anisotropic-diffusion fokker-planck ...

    2021

  10. [18]

    Smith , author F

    author author R. Smith , author F. De Marco , author L. Broche , author M.-C. \ Zdora , author N. W. \ Phillips , author R. Boardman ,\ and\ author P. Thibault ,\ title title X-ray directional dark-field imaging using unified modulated pattern analysis , \ @noop journal journa...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Malecki , author G

    author author A. Malecki , author G. Potdevin , author E. E. \ T. Biernath , author T. L. \ K. Willer , author J. Maisenbacher , author J. Gibmeier , author A. Wanner ,\ and\ author F. Pfeiffer ,\ title title X-ray tensor tomography , \ @noop journal journal Europhysics Letter...

    2014

  12. [20]

    Vogel , author F

    author author J. Vogel , author F. Schaff , author A. Fehringer , author M. W. \ C. Jud , author F. Pfeiffer ,\ and\ author T. Lasser ,\ title title Constrained x-ray tensor tomography reconstruction , \ @noop journal journal Opticts Express \ volume 23 ,\ pages 15134--15151 (...

    2015

  13. [21]

    Sharma , author M

    author author Y. Sharma , author M. Wieczorek , author F. Schaff , author S. Seyyedi , author F. Prade , author F. Pfeiffer ,\ and\ author T. Lasser ,\ title title Six dimensional x-ray tensor tomography with a compact laboratory setup , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics...

    2016

  14. [22]

    Sharma , author F

    author author Y. Sharma , author F. Schaff , author M. Wieczorek , author F. Pfeiffer ,\ and\ author T. Lasser ,\ title title Design of acquisition schemes and setup geometry for anisotropic x-ray dark-field tomography (axdt) , \ @noop journal journal Scientific Reports \ volu...

    2017

  15. [23]

    Felsner , author S

    author author L. Felsner , author S. Hu , author A. Maier , author J. Bopp , author V. Ludwig , author G. Anton ,\ and\ author C. Riess ,\ title title A 3-d projection model for x-ray dark-field imaging , \ @noop journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 9 ,\ pages 9216 ( ye...

    2019

  16. [24]

    Kim , author M

    author author J. Kim , author M. Kagias , author F. Marone ,\ and\ author M. Stampanoni ,\ title title X-ray scattering tensor tomography with circular gratings , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 116 ,\ pages 134102 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  17. [25]

    Kagias , author Z

    author author M. Kagias , author Z. Wang , author M. E. \ Birkbak , author E. Lauridsen , author M. Abis , author G. Lovric , author K. Jefimovs ,\ and\ author M. Stampanoni ,\ title title Diffractive small angle x-ray scattering imaging for anisotropic structures , \ @noop jo...

    2019

  18. [26]

    Kim , author M

    author author J. Kim , author M. Kagias , author F. Marone , author Z. Shi ,\ and\ author M. Stampanoni ,\ title title Fast acquisition protocol for x-ray scattering tensor tomography , \ @noop journal journal Scientific reports \ volume 11 ,\ pages 23046 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  19. [27]

    Kim , author A

    author author J. Kim , author A. Slyamov , author E. Lauridsen , author M. Birkbak , author T. Ramos , author F. Marone , author J. W. \ Andreasen , author M. Stampanoni ,\ and\ author M. Kagias ,\ title title Macroscopic mapping of microscale fibers in freeform injection mold...

    2022

  20. [28]

    Lautizi , author A

    author author G. Lautizi , author A. Studer , author M.-C. \ Zdora , author F. De Marco , author J. Kim , author V. Di Trapani , author F. Marone , author P. Thibault ,\ and\ author M. Stampanoni ,\ title title Universal reconstruction method for x-ray scattering tensor tomogr...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Di Trapani , author S

    author author V. Di Trapani , author S. Savatović , author F. De Marco , author G. Lautizi , author M. Margini ,\ and\ author P. Thibault ,\ title title Speckle-based imaging (sbi) applications with spectral photon counting detectors at the newly established optimato (optimal ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    author author P. J. \ Basser \ and\ author C. Pierpaoli ,\ title title Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance B \ volume 111 ,\ pages 209--219 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  23. [31]

    Zanette , author T

    author author I. Zanette , author T. Zhou , author A. Burvall , author U. Lundstr\"om , author D. H. \ Larsson , author M. Zdora , author P. Thibault , author F. Pfeiffer ,\ and\ author H. M. \ Hertz ,\ title title Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with...

    2014

  24. [32]

    Zhou , author I

    author author T. Zhou , author I. Zanette , author M.-C. \ Zdora , author U. Lundstr\" o m , author D. H. \ Larsson , author H. M. \ Hertz , author F. Pfeiffer ,\ and\ author A. Burvall ,\ title title Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging with a laboratory source and the ...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.