Dense Molecular gas and Dusty Torus in NGC 4303

\'Angel A. Son\'i; Arturo I. G\'omez-Ruiz; Erika Ben\'itez; Irene Cruz-Gonz\'alez; Mart\'in Herrera-Endoqui; Yair Krongold

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 109 references

Dense Molecular gas and Dusty Torus in NGC 4303

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The central 1.6 kpc of NGC 4303 holds 180 million Suns of molecular gas, and its dense gas contributes about a quarter of that reservoir.

desk verdict Solid single-galaxy data paper with a real but contained systematic: the abstract's H2 mass hides a factor-2.5 Tex dependence, yet the qualitative dense-gas conclusion survives. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18723 v1 pith:SY6DUYUY submitted 2024-11-27 astro-ph.GA

Ángel A. Soní , Irene Cruz-González , Martín Herrera-Endoqui , Erika Benítez , Yair Krongold , Arturo I. Gómez-Ruiz This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords NGC4303densemoleculargasHCNluminosityfractiondustytorusSEDfittingSeyfert2starformationrate

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper examines the central 1.6 kpc of the nearby barred spiral galaxy NGC 4303 with 3 mm spectroscopy and a broad-band spectral energy distribution fit. It reports a molecular hydrogen mass of $(1.75\pm0.32)\times10^8\,M_\odot$ (at an assumed excitation temperature of 30 K) and a dense gas mass of $(4.7\pm0.3)\times10^7\,M_\odot$ traced by HCN, so that dense gas contributes about one quarter of the total molecular reservoir once helium is included. The SED fit yields a clumpy dusty torus with luminosity $(7.1\pm2.8)\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and a viewing angle of $67^\circ\pm16^\circ$, consistent with a Type 2 AGN whose contribution to the infrared luminosity is marginal, near 20%. The authors conclude that the nuclear region is a mixed starburst and AGN system with a substantial dense gas reservoir and a nearly edge-on torus.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two coupled measurements. First, the $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ radiative-transfer equation, applied under LTE with a single excitation temperature $T_{\rm ex}$, converts the measured $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ integrated intensity and optical depth $\tau_{13}=0.09\pm0.01$ into a column density $N(\mathrm{H}_2)$ and, through a beam-area assumption, a total molecular mass; this step is what makes the final mass depend directly on the chosen $T_{\rm ex}$. Second, the HCN(1-0) luminosity is converted to dense gas mass through the empirical $\alpha_{\mathrm{HCN}} = 10\,M_\odot\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}\,(\mathrm{K\,km\,s}^{-1})^{-1}$ factor, and the spectral energy distribution is decomposed with a clumpy torus model and energy-balance fitting to extract torus luminosity, inclination, and AGN fraction.

What would settle it

Measure the $^{12}\mathrm{CO}(2-1)$ or a pair of optically thin isotopologue lines with matched beams toward the central 1.6 kpc to determine the excitation temperature independently; if the resulting $T_{\rm ex}$ is near 10 K, the quoted molecular gas mass would be overestimated by a factor of 2.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the interstellar medium in the nuclear 1.6 kpc of NGC 4303 carries a significant dense gas component—$M_{\rm dense} = 0.21\,M(\mathrm{H}_2)$ in mass ratio, or a surface-density fraction $f_{\rm dense} = 0.13 \pm 0.06$—and that the galaxy hosts a large, clumpy, nearly edge-on dusty torus whose fitted inclination of about $67^\circ$ agrees with its Seyfert 2 classification. The molecular mass is obtained from the optically thin $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ transition under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium with $T_{\rm ex}=30$ K, using the observed $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ flux together with a literature $^{12}\mathrm{CO}$ flux to set the optical depth. The dense gas mass comes from converting the HCN(1-0) luminosity with the standard $\alpha_{\mathrm{HCN}}$ factor. The AGN parameters come from an energy-balanced fit to photometry spanning UV to submillimetre wavelengths, which returns an AGN fraction of only about 20%.

Load-bearing premise

The molecular mass rests on a single assumed excitation temperature of 30 K, inferred indirectly from the HNC-to-HCN ratio; if the gas were actually at 10 K the reported mass would drop by a factor of 2.5 and the dense gas fraction would roughly triple.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A central reservoir of $1.75\times10^8\,M_\odot$ of molecular gas, with $4.7\times10^7\,M_\odot$ of dense gas, is enough to sustain the circumnuclear starburst ring and puts the galaxy on the star-forming main sequence.
The torus viewing angle of $67^\circ\pm16^\circ$ places NGC 4303 in the Type 2 geometry of the unified AGN scheme, consistent with its optical classification.
The marginal $\sim$20% AGN fraction, together with young stellar populations, supports the idea that the AGN is currently in a fading phase.
The dense gas velocities ($178\pm60$ km s$^{-1}$) and diffuse gas velocities ($151\pm29$ km s$^{-1}$) are consistent with bar-dominated rotation inside 2 kpc, tying the gas kinematics to the galactic bar rather than to an outflow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because $T_{\rm ex}=30$ K is inferred indirectly from the HNC/HCN ratio, an independent temperature measurement (for example from higher-J lines) would decide whether the molecular mass is closer to $1.75\times10^8$ or $6.9\times10^7\,M_\odot$; in the latter case the dense gas fraction would rise to about 0.3, changing the paper's qualitative conclusion from 'significant dense gas' to 'dense gas d
The single-beam measurement averages over the two molecular lanes mapped by earlier high-resolution CO observations; a resolved map of $^{13}\mathrm{CO}$ and C$^{18}$O would test whether beam dilution affects the surface density and the $f_{\rm dense}$ value.
The far-infrared residuals in the SED fit suggest that the torus luminosity and AGN fraction could shift if a more flexible dust model or nuclear-resolved photometry were used; a mid-infrared spectrum of the 9.7 $\mu$m silicate feature would provide a direct check on the clumpy torus parameters.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

This is a straightforward, well-organized single-galaxy study. It gives the first RSR/LMT 3 mm spectrum of NGC 4303, including new detections of C2H and C18O, and a CIGALE SED fit to archival photometry that yields torus and AGN parameters. The molecular line detections and derived values are broadly consistent with earlier work (Schinnerer et al. 2002 for the mass, Leroy et al. 2021 for the SFR), which is a real point in its favor. The methods are standard, the assumptions are stated, and the authors show the full range of their derived values in Table 2.

The main soft spot is the abstract. The headline M_H2 = (1.75±0.32)×10^8 Msun is quoted for Tex = 30 K, with error bars that only reflect the line fits. Table 2 shows the mass ranges from 6.88×10^7 Msun at Tex = 10 K to 1.75×10^8 Msun at Tex = 30 K, a factor of 2.5. The choice of 30 K is justified by the HNC/HCN ratio via Hirota et al. (1998), which is an indirect abundance-ratio thermometer and can be affected by PDR/XDR chemistry in a Seyfert/starburst center. The abstract should either quote the full range or flag the systematic. That said, the qualitative claim—that dense gas contributes significantly to the total molecular gas—is actually robust: at Tex = 10 K the dense gas fraction rises from 0.13 to ~0.30, so the conclusion only strengthens. The factor-of-2.5 mass uncertainty matters for absolute mass and surface density, but it does not change the paper's main interpretive point.

The SED/torus results are framed cautiously ('consistent with a Type 2 AGN', 'marginal at ~20%'), which is appropriate given the reduced chi^2 of 3.1 and known degeneracies in clumpy torus parameters. The conversion factors are taken from literature, not fitted, so the circularity burden is low. The comparison sample for the diagnostic diagrams is a useful service even though no strong trend separates activity types.

This paper is for people working on molecular gas in nearby active galaxies or on SED-based torus constraints. It is not groundbreaking, but it is a serious, useful data paper. It deserves peer review, with one substantive request: propagate the Tex systematic into the headline mass or present the range centrally. Engage with it.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents RSR/LMT 3 mm spectroscopy of the central ~1.6 kpc of NGC 4303, detecting C2H, HCN, HCO+, HNC, C18O, and 13CO, plus a marginal CS detection. Using LTE radiative transfer on 13CO, the authors derive column densities and H2 masses for Tex = 10, 20, and 30 K, and adopt Tex = 30 K to quote M(H2) = (1.75 ± 0.32) × 10^8 Msun, Mmol = (2.38 ± 0.43) × 10^8 Msun, and Sigma_mol = 112 ± 20 Msun/pc2. From HCN they derive Mdense = (4.7 ± 0.3) × 10^7 Msun and fdense = 0.13 ± 0.06. The paper also fits the integrated UV-to-submm SED with CIGALE, obtaining a clumpy torus with L_TORUS = (7.1 ± 2.8) × 10^43 erg/s, inclination 67 ± 16°, L_IR = (3.51 ± 0.30) × 10^44 erg/s, SFR = 6.0 ± 0.3 Msun/yr, and fracAGN = 0.2. The conclusions are that the central ISM is a mixed starburst/Type 2 AGN system with a marginal AGN contribution and a significant dense gas reservoir.

Significance. If the systematic uncertainties were properly propagated, this would be a useful contribution to studies of molecular gas in nearby AGN/starburst nuclei. The paper's strengths are the clearly tabulated line fluxes and Gaussian parameters, the transparent LTE calculation for the isotopic CO lines, the explicit check for OFF-beam contamination, and the inclusion of a clumpy torus component in the CIGALE SED fitting. The comparison with the OVRO map, literature kinematics, and the LHCN-LIR relation places the galaxy in a useful observational context. However, the headline mass and dense gas fraction are controlled by the assumed Tex and by adopted conversion factors whose systematics are not included in the quoted error bars; the current abstract and conclusions therefore overstate the precision of the central claims.

major comments (4)

[§4.1, Eq. (4), Table 2; Abstract] The abstract and conclusions quote M_H2 = (1.75 ± 0.32) × 10^8 Msun and fdense ≈ 0.13 as central results, but these values are tied to the Tex = 30 K assumption. Table 2 shows that the same data yield M(H2) = 6.88 × 10^7 Msun at Tex = 10 K and 1.22 × 10^8 Msun at 20 K, a factor of 2.5 range, and §5.1 acknowledges that Sigma_mol varies by a factor of 2 within this range. The quoted ±0.32 × 10^8 Msun contains only the line-fit uncertainty and does not include this systematic. The justification for Tex = 30 K in §5.2 is the HNC/HCN = 0.58 ratio via Hirota et al. (1998), which is an abundance-ratio thermometer calibrated on dark cloud cores; it is not a direct excitation temperature for 13CO(1-0), and in a Seyfert/starburst center the HNC/HCN ratio can be affected by PDR/XDR chemistry. Please either report the mass as a systematic range (or with a full combined uncertainty), propagate the Tex range into fdense and the surface densities, and adjust the abstract's quoted precision, or provide independent evidence for the gas excitation temperature.
[§4.1, Eqs. (8) and (9), footnote 7] The dense gas mass and dense gas fraction are computed with alpha_HCN = 10 Msun pc^-2 (K km/s)^-1, which the text itself describes in footnote 7 as 'a typical upper limit for spiral galaxies.' The quoted Mdense = (4.7 ± 0.3) × 10^7 Msun and fdense = 0.13 ± 0.06 error bars contain only the HCN integrated-intensity uncertainty. A factor of 2-3 lower alpha_HCN, as suggested by some resolved studies for nuclear environments, would reduce Mdense and fdense by the same factor and directly weaken the claim that dense gas contributes significantly to the total molecular gas mass. The systematic sensitivity to alpha_HCN must be quantified or discussed before the dense gas fraction conclusion can be assessed.
[§4.1, Eq. (9); §5.1] The beam areas used for Sigma_mol and Sigma_dense are not the same: 20'' for 13CO and 25'' for HCN, corresponding to linear diameters of ~1.6 and ~2.0 kpc at the adopted distance. Equation (9) divides a 25''-beam surface density by a 20''-beam surface density as if both quantities referred to the same region. The molecular gas is not uniformly distributed in the central kiloparsecs (the OVRO map in Fig. 4 shows separate gas lanes and a circumnuclear ring), so this aperture mismatch can bias fdense. The authors should either compute both quantities over a common aperture or explicitly quantify the effect of the beam-size difference.
[§5.1, paragraph following Eq. (9)] The sentence 'The relationship between dense and molecular mass is Mdense = 0.21 M(H2)' is not reproduced by the paper's own numbers: Mdense/M(H2) = 4.7/17.5 ≈ 0.27, while Mdense/Mmol = 4.7/23.8 ≈ 0.20 when the helium factor is included. The comparison with fdense = 0.13 ± 0.06 should be made consistently against a single defined quantity; as written, it is ambiguous whether M(H2), Mmol, or the beam-matched surface density ratio is being used, and this ambiguity matters for the paper's main qualitative conclusion.

minor comments (5)

[Table 2; §4.1] The Table 2 caption promises column densities of 12CO, 13CO, and H2, and the text says the table includes N12, but the table lists only N13, N(H2), and M(H2). Please add the N12 column or revise the caption and text.
[Table 4; §4.1] Table 4 lists a CS/C18O ratio even though §4.1 states that CS(2-1) is only a marginal detection and is excluded from the line analysis. A ratio built from an upper-limit line should be flagged as an upper limit or removed from the table.
[§2; §3] Section 2 says the RSR covers 73-111 GHz, while §3 states that the reduced spectrum covers 84-111 GHz in the rest frame. Please clarify which spectral range was actually used and whether the low-frequency chassis was excluded.
[Eq. (3)] Equation (3) should state explicitly that it assumes the 12CO line is optically thick (so 1 - exp(-tau12) approximately equals 1) and that both lines share the same excitation temperature and beam filling; these are standard assumptions, but they are not stated in the text.
[Fig. 3; Table 7] There are several typographical errors: 'appricot' in the Fig. 3 caption and 'Bayessian' in Table 7. The reduced chi-squared of 3.1 is also described as 'fairly good' largely by visual inspection; a brief note on the expected chi-squared for the number of photometric points would help the reader judge the fit quality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: molecular masses use external LTE and conversion calibrations, and torus/SED properties are genuine CIGALE fits to external photometry; the Tex=30 choice is a transparent input, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. M(H2) follows from the measured I13 and the literature I12 (Israel 2020) through Eqs. (3)-(6), with abundance ratios from Wilson & Rood (1994) and Dickman (1978). The excitation temperature is an input, not an output: Table 2 reports N13, N(H2), and M(H2) for Tex = 10, 20, and 30 K, and §5.2 selects 30 K using the HNC/HCN ratio with Hirota et al. (1998), an external abundance-ratio thermometer. The selection is indirect and carries a real systematic (M(H2) varies by a factor of ~2.5, and fdense varies from 0.13 to ~0.30 across the tabulated Tex range), but this is a robustness limitation acknowledged in §4.1 ('Σmol varies by a factor of 2'), not a circularity. Mdense uses α_HCN = 10 from Gao & Solomon (2004b) and the standard luminosity formula; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The torus and SED results are outputs of CIGALE fits to external UV-to-submm photometry (Table 5); the inclination and fracAGN are fitted, not claimed as predictions, and the 'consistent with a Type 2 AGN' statement is a posterior comparison to the Unified Model and the external Véron-Cetty & Véron (2006) classification. Self-citations (Miyaji et al. 2019; Yamada et al. 2023; Cruz-González et al. 2020) are usage examples or comparison points and are not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation; the CLUMPY module is attributed to Nenkova et al. (2008). The score of 1 reflects the presence of overlapping-author citations, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mass estimates rest on standard LTE assumptions and adopted abundance ratios from the literature, not on parameters fitted in this paper. The CIGALE-derived torus properties and AGN fraction are fit outputs; they are reported transparently but remain model-dependent. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)

Excitation temperature Tex (preferred value 30 K) = 30 K (also 10 and 20 K considered)
The H2 mass and surface density quoted in the abstract use Tex=30 K; Table 2 shows M(H2) ranges from 6.88e7 to 1.75e8 Msun across Tex=10-30 K. The choice is partly justified by the HNC/HCN ratio but is a modeling assumption.
AGN fraction fracAGN = 0.20 ± 0.07
Free parameter in the CIGALE SED fit; the claim of a marginal AGN contribution rests on this fitted value. The paper notes that fracAGN=0.2 is a lower limit for reliable AGN classification in CIGALE studies.
Torus inclination incl = 67° ± 16° (Bayesian), best fit 80°
Fitted CLUMPY torus parameter used to classify NGC 4303 as Type 2. It is degenerate with other torus parameters and may not be robust at low AGN fraction.
Torus optical depth tau_V = 184 ± 38
Fitted parameter of the Nenkova (2008) CLUMPY model, reported as a torus property.
Number of clouds N0 = 14 ± 2
Fitted CLUMPY parameter characterizing the torus structure.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption LTE radiative transfer with a single excitation temperature applies to the 13CO(1-0) line
Invoked in Section 4.1, Eq. (4), following Jiménez-Donaire et al. (2017). The column density and mass depend on the assumed Tex.
domain assumption The 13CO line is optically thin (tau13=0.09), derived using I12 from Israel (2020) with a slightly different beam (22'' vs 20'') and assuming the same beam-filling factor for both lines
Section 4.1, Eq. (3). If tau13 were larger, the column density estimate would change.
domain assumption Fixed abundance ratios [H2/13CO]=588,235 (Dickman 1978) and [12CO/13CO]=89 (Wilson & Rood 1994) apply to the nuclear region
Used in Eqs. (4)-(5). The paper notes the 12CO/13CO ratio can vary by a factor of 4.5 between environments.
domain assumption The emitting gas fills the telescope main beam uniformly (constant beam-filling factor)
Implicit in Eq. (6) where the beam diameter is used to convert column density to mass. The paper applies a beam-filling caveat to the 12CO method but not explicitly to the 13CO-derived mass.
domain assumption The CIGALE SED components (bc03 stellar population, Calzetti attenuation, Themis dust, Nenkova CLUMPY torus) and the energy-balance assumption describe NGC 4303 correctly
Section 4.3 and Table 6. The torus inclination and AGN fraction are outputs of this assumed model framework.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dense Molecular gas and Dusty Torus in NGC 4303." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SY6DUYUY

@misc{pith2026241118723,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dense Molecular gas and Dusty Torus in NGC 4303},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SY6DUYUY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18723}
}

abstract

Spectrum analysis at 3 mm of the central region ($r\sim$800 pc) of NGC\,4303 showed molecular gas lines of both dense gas tracers (HCN, HNC, HCO$^+$, and C$_2$H) and diffuse gases ($^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O). Molecular gas derived parameters: $H_2$ mass $M_{H_2}$=(1.75$\pm$0.32)$\times10^{8}$ M$_{\odot}$; radial velocity, V$_{dense}=$178$\pm$60 km\,s$^{-1}$, and V$_{CO}=$151$\pm$29 km\,s$^{-1}$; HCN luminosity $L_{HCN}$=(7.38$\pm$1.40)$\times10^{6}\,\,K\,\,km\,\,s^{-1}\,pc^{2}$; dense gas mass $M_{dense}$=(4.7$\pm$0.3) $\times 10^{7}$ M$_{\odot}$, and dense gas tracers abundances indicating that dense gas contributes significantly to the total molecular gas mass. To explore the AGN nature and central dusty torus of the galaxy, CIGALE was used to fit the integrated spectral energy distribution from submillimeter to UV frequencies. Large torus properties are estimated: luminosity $L_{TORUS}$\,=\,(7.1$\pm$2.8) $\times 10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and line of sight inclination of 67$\pm$16$^\circ$, which is consistent with a Type 2 AGN; total infrared luminosity $L_{IR}$=(3.51$\,\pm$\,0.30)$\times 10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$; star formation rate $SFR$=6.0$\pm$0.3 M$_{\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$; and found that the AGN contribution is marginal at $\sim$20\%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18723 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Observed (blue) molecular lines with S/N > 3 of NGC 4303 and their Gaussian fits (orange dashed lines). We detected dense gas tracers as well as 12CO isotopic varieties. From left to right the molecular lines are as follows: (top row) C2H, HCN, HCO+; (bottom row) HNC, C18O and 13CO. mass of H2. M(H2) = πd2 4 N(H2) mH2 (6) The derived parameters for NGC 4303 are presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The best SED model fit for NGC 4303 using CIGALE. Shown are the observed fluxes (purple circles), model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A high spatial resolution (∼150 pc) map of the center of NGC 4303 observed with OVRO in the 12CO (1-0) line obtained by Schinnerer et al. (2002) covering 22′′×22′′. The center (black circle) has a diameter of 8′′ , and the red circle is RSR/LMT region of 20′′which rep…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Diagnostic diagrams left-to-right HCN/12CO, HCO+/ 12CO and HNC/12CO for a sample of nine nearby galaxies from Jim´enez-Donaire et al. (2019). Squares are the values in the interarms regions, triangles are the values in the arms and circles are the values of the centers…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Line ratio diagrams for a set of 22 galaxies in the literature plus central 1.6 kpc of NGC 4303. Left to right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: R12/13 vs. HCO+/HCN for a sample of 12 nearby galaxies. The open black hexagon is the value for the center of NGC 4303. Although a clear linear dependence can be seen between the lines, there is no dependence on galactic activity. dances, indicating that at high densit…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

[1]

S., Black, J

Aalto, S., Booth, R. S., Black, J. H., & Johansson, L. E. B. 1995, A&A, 300, 369

1995
[2]

N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., & et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543

2009
[3]

2015, A&A, 579, A101

Aladro, R., Mart ´ ın, S., Riquelme, D., & et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A101

2015
[4]

2015, As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 579, A101

Aladro, R., Mart ´ ın, S., Riquelme, D., & et al. 2015, As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 579, A101

2015
[5]

1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

1993
[6]

2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/MNRAS/428/1880

Auld, R., Bianchi, S., Smith, & et al. 2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/MNRAS/428/1880

2013
[7]

2008, A&A, 477, 747

Wiklind, T. 2008, A&A, 477, 747

2008
[8]

2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/ApJS/220/6

Bai, Y., Zou, H., Liu, J., & Wang, S. 2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/ApJS/220/6

2015

Show all 109 references

[9]

J., Galliano, F., & Madden, S

Bendo, G. J., Galliano, F., & Madden, S. C. 2012, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/MNRAS/423/197

2012
[10]

L., Larson, D., Weiland, J

Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., & Hinshaw, G. 2014, ApJ, 794, 135

2014
[11]

Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W. J. G., Madore, B., & Thornley, M. D. 2008, AJ, 136, 2846

2008
[12]

K., Jim´ enez-Donaire, M

Bigiel, F., Leroy, A. K., Jim´ enez-Donaire, M. J., & et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 822, L26

2016
[13]

D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A

Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207 18 SON ´I ET AL

2013
[14]

2019, A&A, 622, A103

Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., & et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103

2019
[15]

2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/570/A69

Boselli, A., Voyer, E., Boissier, S., & et al. 2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/570/A69

2014
[16]

& Charlot, S

Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

2003
[17]

C., & et al

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., & et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682 Cano-D ´ ıaz, M.,´Avila-Reese, V., S´ anchez, S. F., & et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3929

2000
[18]

2003, PASP, 115, 763

Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

2003
[19]

S., Yang, X

Chen, P. S., Yang, X. H., Liu, J. Y., & Shan, H. G. 2018, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/AJ/155/17

2018
[20]

Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Hygate, & et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 2872

2020
[21]

2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/565/A128

Ciesla, L., Boquien, M., Boselli, A., & et al. 2014, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/565/A128

2014
[22]

2015, A&A, 576, A10

Ciesla, L., Charmandaris, V., Georgakakis, A., & et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A10

2015
[23]

A., & et al

Riffel, R. A., & et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A48

2015
[24]

2012, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/544/A101

Cortese, L., Boissier, S., Boselli, A., & et al. 2012, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/A+A/544/A101

2012
[25]

I., & et al

Costagliola, F., Aalto, S., Rodriguez, M. I., & et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A30 Cruz-Gonz´ alez, I., G´ omez-Ruiz, A. I., Cald´ u-Primo, A., Ben ´ ıtez, E., Rodr ´ ıguez-Espinosa, J. M., & et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2042

2011
[26]

S., Erickson, N., & et al

Cybulski, R., Yun, M. S., Erickson, N., & et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3287

2016
[27]

Dalya, G., Frei, Z., Galgoczi, G., Raffai, P., & de Souza, R. S. 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog, VII/275

2016
[28]

Z., Riffel, R., Colina, L., Riffel, R

Dametto, N. Z., Riffel, R., Colina, L., Riffel, R. A., Pi- queras L´ opez, J., & et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 4437

2019
[29]

Davis, T. A. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2378 de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, Herold G., J., & et al. 1991, Third Reference Cat- alogue of Bright Galaxies Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., Kirk, H., MacKenzie, T., & Ledwosinska, E. 2008, ApJS, 175, 277

2014
[30]

Dickman, R. L. 1978, ApJS, 37, 407

1978
[31]

2020, ApJ, 905, 29

Esparza-Arredondo, D., Osorio-Clavijo, N., Gonz´ alez- Mart ´ ın, O., & et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 29

2020
[32]

G., Hora, J

Fazio, G. G., Hora, J. L., Allen, L. E., & et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

2004
[33]

Filippenko, A. V. & Sargent, W. L. W. 1985, ApJS, 57, 503

1985
[34]

E., & Tyson, J

Frei, Z., Guhathakurta, P., Gunn, J. E., & Tyson, J. A. 1996, AJ, 111, 174

1996
[35]

2006, MNRAS, 366, 767

Fritz, J., Franceschini, A., & Hatziminaoglou, E. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 767

2006
[36]

& Solomon, P

Gao, Y. & Solomon, P. M. 2004a, ApJS, 152, 63 —. 2004b, ApJ, 606, 271 Garc ´ ıa-Burillo, S. IAU Symposium, Vol. 315, , From In- terstellar Clouds to Star-Forming Galaxies: Univer- sal Processes?, ed. P. JablonkaP. Andr´ e & F. van der Tak, 207–214 Graci´ a-Carpio, J., Garc ´ ı...

2006
[37]

J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., & et al

Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A., & et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L3

2010
[38]

1998, ApJ, 503, 717

Hirota, T., Yamamoto, S., Mikami, H., & Ohishi, M. 1998, ApJ, 503, 717

1998
[39]

S., Robson, E

Holland, W. S., Robson, E. I., Gear, W. K., & et al. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 659 H¨ onig, S. F. & Kishimoto, M. 2017, ApJ, 838, L20

1999
[40]

P., Wyatt, W

Huchra, J. P., Wyatt, W. F., & Davis, M. 1982, AJ, 87, 1628

1982
[41]

J., Pettitt, A

Iles, E. J., Pettitt, A. R., & Okamoto, T. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3899

2022
[42]

2023, ApJ, 954, 148

Imanishi, M., Baba, S., Nakanishi, K., & Izumi, T. 2023, ApJ, 954, 148

2023
[43]

Israel, F. P. 2020, A&A, 635, A131

2020
[44]

H., Masci, F., Tsai, C

Jarrett, T. H., Masci, F., Tsai, C. W., & et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 6

2013
[45]

2011, MNRAS, 418, 1753 Jim´ enez-Bail´ on, E., Santos-Lle´ o, M., Mas-Hesse, J

Jiang, X., Wang, J., & Gu, Q. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1753 Jim´ enez-Bail´ on, E., Santos-Lle´ o, M., Mas-Hesse, J. M.,

2011
[46]

Delgado, R. M. 2003, ApJ, 593, 127 Jim´ enez-Donaire, M. J. 2017, PhD thesis, Ruprecht- Karls University of Heidelberg, Germany Jim´ enez-Donaire, M. J., Bigiel, F., Leroy, A. K., & et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 49 —. 2019, ApJ, 880, 127

2003
[47]

P., K¨ ohler, M., Ysard, N., Bocchio, M., & Ver- straete, L

Jones, A. P., K¨ ohler, M., Ysard, N., Bocchio, M., & Ver- straete, L. 2017, A&A, 602, A46

2017
[48]

C., Mehringer, D

Keene, J., Schilke, P., Kooi, J., Lis, D. C., Mehringer, D. M., & Phillips, T. G. 1998, ApJ, 494, L107

1998
[49]

Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531

2012
[50]

2014, ApJS, 215, 22

Lee, Y., Chung, J., Pak, M., Yi, W., & Lee, W. 2014, ApJS, 215, 22

2014
[51]

E., Rosolowsky, E., Nofech, J., & et al

Lang, P., Meidt, S. E., Rosolowsky, E., Nofech, J., & et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 897, 122

2020
[52]

S., & et al

Lee, C., Chung, A., Yun, M. S., & et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 1363

2014
[53]

A., Chastenet, J., Chiang, I.- D., Gallagher, M

Salim, S., Behrens, E. A., Chastenet, J., Chiang, I.- D., Gallagher, M. J., Kessler, S., & Utomo, D. 2019, ApJS, 244, 24

2019
[54]

K., Schinnerer, E., Hughes, A., & et al

Leroy, A. K., Schinnerer, E., Hughes, A., & et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 43

2021
[55]

K., Usero, A., Schruba, A., & et al

Leroy, A. K., Usero, A., Schruba, A., & et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 217

2017
[56]

2020, Publications of the Astro- DENSE MOLECULAR GAS AND DUSTY TORUS IN NGC 4303 19 nomical Society of Japan, 72

Gao, Y., & Li, S. 2020, Publications of the Astro- DENSE MOLECULAR GAS AND DUSTY TORUS IN NGC 4303 19 nomical Society of Japan, 72

2020
[57]

2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 4508

Li, F., Wang, J., Gao, F., & et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 4508

2021
[58]

F., Spaans, M., Baan, W

Loenen, A. F., Spaans, M., Baan, W. A., & Meijerink, R. 2008, A&A, 488, L5

2008
[59]

2017, ApJ, 846, 102

Spinoglio, L., & Rush, B. 2017, ApJ, 846, 102

2017
[60]

C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., & et al

Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., & et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L1 Mart ´ ın, S., Kohno, K., Izumi, T., & et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A116

2005
[61]

Meier, D. S. & Turner, J. L. 2005, ApJ, 618, 259

2005
[62]

S., Walter, F., Bolatto, A

Meier, D. S., Walter, F., Bolatto, A. D., & et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 801, 63

2015
[63]

& Spaans, M

Meijerink, R. & Spaans, M. 2005, A&A, 436, 397

2005
[64]

Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., & Israel, F. P. 2007, A&A, 461, 793

2007
[65]

2019, ApJ, 884, L10

Miyaji, T., Herrera-Endoqui, M., Krumpe, M., & et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, L10

2019
[66]

2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 72

Morokuma-Matsui, K., Sorai, K., Sato, Y., & et al. 2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 72

2020
[67]

& Kennicutt, Jr., R

Moustakas, J. & Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 2006, ApJS, 164, 81

2006
[68]

2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 685

Nenkova, M., Sirocky, M., Ivezic, Z., & Elitzur, M. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 685

2008
[69]

J., van Duinen, R., & et al

Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., van Duinen, R., & et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, L1

1984
[70]

J., Bigiel, F., & et al

Neumann, L., Gallagher, M. J., Bigiel, F., & et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 3348

2023
[71]

D., & et al

Nishimura, Y., Aalto, S., Gorski, M. D., & et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.15436

2024 arXiv
[72]

L., Riedinger, J

Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., & et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1

2010
[73]

2010, A&A, 518, L2

Poglitsch, A., Waelkens, C., Geis, N., & et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L2

2010
[74]

C., Ricci, C., Aalto, S., & et al

Privon, G. C., Ricci, C., Aalto, S., & et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 149

2020
[75]

Rahman, N., Helou, G., & Mazzarella, J. M. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1068

2006
[76]

A., Colina, L., Storchi-Bergmann, T., & et al

Riffel, R. A., Colina, L., Storchi-Bergmann, T., & et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 4192

2016
[77]

A., Greve, T

Rybak, M., Hodge, J. A., Greve, T. R., & et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A70

2022
[78]

Salim, S., Boquien, M., & Lee, J. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 11

2018
[79]

C., Janowiecki, S., da Cunha, E., Dick- inson, M., Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Salzer, J

Salim, S., Lee, J. C., Janowiecki, S., da Cunha, E., Dick- inson, M., Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Salzer, J. J., & Charlot, S. 2016, ApJS, 227, 2

2016
[80]

B., Mazzarella, J

Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J. A., & Soifer, B. T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1607

2003
[81]

M., Leroy, A

Sandstrom, K. M., Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., & et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 5

2013
[82]

Santos, D. J. D., Goto, T., Kim, S. J., & et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3070

2021
[83]

Schinnerer, E., Maciejewski, W., Scoville, N., & Mous- takas, L. A. 2002, ApJ, 575, 826

2002
[84]

L., & et al

Sheth, K., Regan, M., Hinz, J. L., & et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 1397

2010
[85]

F., Cutri, R

Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., & et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

2006
[86]

L., Narayanan, G., Yun, M

Snell, R. L., Narayanan, G., Yun, M. S., & et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 38

2011
[87]

T., Boehmer, L., Neugebauer, G., & Sanders, D

Soifer, B. T., Boehmer, L., Neugebauer, G., & Sanders, D. B. 1989, AJ, 98, 766

1989
[88]

M., Downes, D., Radford, S

Solomon, P. M., Downes, D., Radford, S. J. E., & Barrett, J. W. 1997, ApJ, 478, 144

1997
[89]

2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan

Sorai, K., Kuno, N., & et al. 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan

2019
[90]

Stassun, K. G. 2019, VizieR Online Data Catalog, IV/38

2019
[91]

W., Bloemen, J

Strong, A. W., Bloemen, J. B. G. M., Dame, T. M., & et al. 1988, A&A, 207, 1

1988
[92]

M., Sun, J., & et al

Teng, Y.-H., Sandstrom, K. M., Sun, J., & et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 950, 119

2023
[93]

C., & et al

Johnson, L. C., & et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 925, 72

2022
[94]

Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803

1995
[95]

2015, AJ, 150, 115

Burillo, S., & et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 115

2015
[96]

K., & et al

Utomo, D., Sun, J., Leroy, A. K., & et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, L18

2018
[97]

Veron-Cetty, M. P. & Veron, P. 1986, A&AS, 66, 335 V´ eron-Cetty, M.-P. & V´ eron, P. 2006, A&A, 455, 773

1986
[98]

J., & et al

Wang, T.-W., Goto, T., Kim, S. J., & et al. 2020, MN- RAS, 499, 4068

2020
[99]

W., Roellig, T

Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., & et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1

2004
[100]

Wilson, T. L. & Rood, R. 1994, ARA&A, 32, 191

1994
[101]

Wright, E. L. 2006, PASP, 118, 1711

2006
[102]

L., Eisenhardt, P

Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., & et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868

2010
[103]

L., & Vanden Bout, P

Shirley, Y. L., & Vanden Bout, P. A. 2005, ApJ, 635, L173

2005
[104]

L., & Knez, C

Wu, J., Evans, Neal J., I., Shirley, Y. L., & Knez, C. 2010, ApJS, 188, 313

2010
[105]

2019, PASJ, 71, S13

Yajima, Y., Sorai, K., Kuno, N., Muraoka, K., & et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, S13

2019
[106]

2023, ApJS, 265, 37

Yamada, S., Ueda, Y., Herrera-Endoqui, M., & et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 37

2023
[107]

S., Aretxaga, I., Gurwell, M

Yun, M. S., Aretxaga, I., Gurwell, M. A., & et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3485

2015
[108]

S., Reddy, N

Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., & Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803

2001
[109]

2021, MNRAS, 500, 2359 20 SON ´I ET AL

Zurita, A., Florido, E., Bresolin, F., P´ erez-Montero, E., & P´ erez, I. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2359 20 SON ´I ET AL. TABLE 5 PHOTOMETRY USED IN THE SED FITTING WITH CIGALE. Band λeff Flux† Telescope/Instrument Res. †† FOV Ref. (µm) (mJy) or Survey ( ′′) ( ′) FUV 0.153 41.3 ±1.9 G...

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

S., Black, J

Aalto, S., Booth, R. S., Black, J. H., & Johansson, L. E. B. 1995, A&A, 300, 369

1995

[2] [2]

N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., & et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543

2009

[3] [3]

2015, A&A, 579, A101

Aladro, R., Mart ´ ın, S., Riquelme, D., & et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A101

2015

[4] [4]

2015, As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 579, A101

Aladro, R., Mart ´ ın, S., Riquelme, D., & et al. 2015, As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 579, A101

2015

[5] [5]

1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

1993

[6] [6]

2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/MNRAS/428/1880

Auld, R., Bianchi, S., Smith, & et al. 2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/MNRAS/428/1880

2013

[7] [7]

2008, A&A, 477, 747

Wiklind, T. 2008, A&A, 477, 747

2008

[8] [8]

2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/ApJS/220/6

Bai, Y., Zou, H., Liu, J., & Wang, S. 2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog, J/ApJS/220/6

2015