Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 39 references

Triangulations of the 3-sphere with knotted edge

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For any knot K in the 3-sphere, there exists a one-vertex triangulation of S^3 containing an edge that forms K, and the construction is explicit.

desk verdict Every knot is an edge in some one-vertex triangulation of S^3: a genuinely new construction, with a terse but probably fixable gap in the composite-knot case. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18938 v1 pith:JPMCT5OB submitted 2024-11-28 math.GT

Dionne Ibarra , Daniel V. Mathews , Jessica S. Purcell , Jonathan Spreer This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GT MSC 57Q1557K3257K3157K1057Q70
keywords one-vertextriangulationsknottededgefullyaugmentedlinkshyperbolicgeometryDehnfillingH-triangulationsdiscreteMorsetheorysimplicial3-spheres
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that every knot K in the 3-sphere can be realized as a single edge of a one-vertex triangulation of $S^{3}$. The proof is constructive: starting from a diagram of K, it builds an ideal triangulation of the knot complement with a face spanning a meridian, then closes the complement with one folded tetrahedron whose distinguished edge becomes K. Because the construction controls the number of tetrahedra, it also yields explicit triangulations that are optimal up to a constant factor for knots such as connected sums of trefoils, and it produces simplicial triangulations whose edge loops force discrete Morse functions to have many critical faces. If the main theorem is right, knot type is never an obstruction to admitting a one-vertex triangulation, and knotted edges can be used systematically to build triangulations with prescribed combinatorial complexity.

What carries the argument

A hat triangle is a face of an ideal triangulation of a knot complement that spans a meridian of the knot's cusp. The key move is the hat-triangle closure: cut the ideal triangulation along such a face, insert a single folded tetrahedron whose two outer faces match the cut face and whose remaining two faces are folded along a distinguished edge E; Lemma 2.5 shows this is exactly meridional Dehn filling, so E represents the knot. To get a hat triangle for an arbitrary knot, the proof uses fully augmented links: augment a twist-reduced diagram with crossing circles, obtain a hyperbolic fully augmented link, triangulate its complement so each crossing circle cusp meets two tetrahedra and each crossing disc contains a meridional face, and then realize the Dehn fillings by layered solid tori.

What would settle it

Take a composite knot such as the square knot, follow Proposition 3.3 to construct its augmented link, and check whether the resulting link is prime, twist-reduced, and hyperbolic; if it is not, or if its Dehn filling does not recover the original knot, the proof chain fails. Alternatively, run the full construction on the trefoil and verify that the distinguished edge of the output one-vertex triangulation is isotopic to the trefoil.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 3.8: for any knot K in $S^{3}$ there is a one-vertex triangulation of $S^{3}$ with an edge forming K. The construction is explicit and diagram-driven. It first reduces arbitrary knots to Dehn fillings of hyperbolic fully augmented links (Proposition 3.3), then proves that every such link complement has an ideal triangulation with hat triangles, one per crossing circle (Proposition 3.7), and finally inserts a folded tetrahedron to obtain the closed one-vertex triangulation (Theorem 2.1, Corollary 2.2). The paper further derives tetrahedron bounds: at most 12c + sum |n_i| - 7 tetrahedra for a knot obtained by 1/n_i Dehn fillings on a c-crossing-circle fully augmented link (Theorem 4.1), and for connected sums of trefoils, a simplicial triangulation with edge loop length four, at most 242(48t-19) tetrahedra, with a matching lower bound up to a constant (Corollaries 4.4, 4.5).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every knot, including composite knots, can be obtained by Dehn filling a hyperbolic fully augmented link; for composite knots the paper's proof of this is compressed, and if that step fails the construction collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every knot type occurs as an edge in some one-vertex triangulation of S^3, so a knotted edge imposes no restriction on admitting such a triangulation.
  • The second derived subdivision turns the one-vertex triangulation into a simplicial triangulation with an edge loop of length four forming the same knot (Corollary 1.1).
  • For connected sums of trefoils, the construction gives simplicial triangulations with O(t) tetrahedra and edge loops of length four, and any simplicial triangulation with an m-edge loop forming K_t needs at least (t - m + 1)/2 tetrahedra, so the size is optimal up to a constant factor.
  • The triangulations force discrete Morse functions to have many critical 2-faces: for K_t, every Morse function has at least t - 3 critical triangles in a 242(48t-19)-tetrahedron triangulation (Corollary 1.3).
  • For knots with few crossing circles, such as double twist knots, the construction yields very small one-vertex triangulations with 3 + floor(k/2) + floor(l/2) tetrahedra, conjectured minimal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction may give explicit geometric ideal triangulations of knot complements whenever the underlying fully augmented link is hyperbolic, which could extend quantum Teichmüller TQFT computations beyond the twist-knot cases.
  • The tetrahedron count depends on the number of crossing circles and filling slopes rather than on the crossing number alone, suggesting that twist-region number is the natural diagrammatic complexity measure for this construction.
  • One could test sharpness computationally by enumerating small one-vertex triangulations of S^3 and checking which knots appear as edges, to see how close the construction's size is to the true minimum for small knots such as the trefoil and figure-eight.
  • For composite knots, different choices of connected-sum decomposition or crossing-circle placement might reduce the tetrahedron count, since the proof pays one crossing circle per connected-sum factor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper gives a constructive proof that for every knot K in S^3 there is a one-vertex triangulation of S^3 with a distinguished edge forming K (Theorem 3.8). The main device is Theorem 2.1: starting from an ideal triangulation of S^3 minus K that contains a 'hat triangle' spanning a meridian, one cuts along that face, inserts a folded tetrahedron, and obtains a closed one-vertex triangulation in which the folded edge is K. The authors then prove, via fully augmented links, that every knot complement admits such a triangulation: Proposition 3.3 reduces an arbitrary knot to a Dehn filling of a hyperbolic fully augmented link; Lemmas 3.4 and 3.5 build explicit ideal triangulations with a meridional face; Lemma 3.6 performs Dehn fillings; Proposition 3.7 and Corollary 2.2 conclude. Section 4 gives explicit tetrahedron bounds, derives simplicial corollaries by second derived subdivision, and applies discrete Morse bounds to produce triangulations with many critical 2-faces, with an asymptotically optimal (up to a constant) treatment of connected sums of trefoils.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it is a significant result: it extends H-triangulations from twist knots to all knots, gives a general construction of one-vertex triangulations of S^3 with an arbitrary prescribed knotted edge, and yields concrete upper bounds on triangulation size. The proof is constructive and explicit, and the paper is careful to track tetrahedron counts in Theorem 4.1 and Corollary 4.2. The applications in Section 4, especially the asymptotically optimal (up to a constant) construction for connected sums of trefoils, are concrete and interesting. The paper builds on published work [19, 33, 34] rather than introducing new hyperbolic-geometry machinery, which makes the core construction transparent and reproducible.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Proposition 3.3] The composite-knot step is under-proved. The claim that the augmented link obtained by adding a crossing circle through the decomposing curve gamma is prime and twist-reduced is the only step standing between the proof and hyperbolicity for composite knots. The sentence 'if delta runs through a neighbourhood of gamma, our construction ensures that every such curve meets the diagram more than twice' is not a proof: no case analysis is given, and a simple closed curve delta lying in the twice-punctured disc bounded by the new crossing circle and meeting only the two knot strands is precisely a configuration that the text does not rule out. Since [33, Theorem 6.1] is invoked to obtain hyperbolicity, and Lemmas 3.4-3.7 require that hyperbolicity, Theorem 3.8 for composite knots depends on this point. Please supply a complete diagrammatic argument or an alternative proof that the modified augmented link is prime and twist-reduced, and verify that the same argument works when the connected-sum decomposition has several decomposing curves.
  2. [Section 3, Proposition 3.3] The Dehn-filling slope for the newly added crossing circle is not stated in Proposition 3.3; later Corollary 4.3 indicates that it should be 1/0. Because Proposition 3.7 invokes Lemma 3.6 to perform Dehn fillings, the proof should explicitly record this slope and verify that filling the new crossing circle along that slope recovers the original connected sum K1 # K2 rather than a twisted or otherwise altered knot.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, Corollary 1.1] The statement that the second derived subdivision turns the knotted edge into an edge loop of length four is plausible but should be justified briefly, since the edge loop length in the derived subdivision depends on the local edge and vertex structure of the one-vertex triangulation.
  2. [Section 3, Lemma 3.6] The phrase 'When |n| = 1 (n = 0)' is confusing; it should read 'When |n| = 1 or n = 0', since the case n = 0 is not covered by the condition |n| = 1.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical spacing issues, such as '1 , 2, 3, . . .' in the introduction and the repeated '∆∆∆' symbol in Section 2; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the main theorem is a new consequence of independent published results on fully augmented links and cusp triangulations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 3.8) is not an input to, nor a restatement of, any result it cites. Proposition 3.3 reduces an arbitrary knot to a Dehn filling of a fully augmented link; for hyperbolic knots this is the standard augmentation argument, and for composite knots the paper supplies a (terse) modification rather than circularly assuming the conclusion. The hyperbolicity criterion invoked in Proposition 3.3 is [33, Theorem 6.1], a published theorem of Purcell with stated hypotheses (non-splittable, prime, twist-reduced diagram with at least two twist regions) that does not include the triangulation result; hence it is independent support, not a self-citation chain. Lemma 3.4 uses the geometric decomposition of fully augmented links from [19] (Ham–Purcell), but that is again an external published result with its own proof, and the present paper adds the cusp-triangulation adjustments (Lemma 3.5) and Dehn-filling realization (Lemma 3.6) rather than renaming [19]. Lemma 3.6 relies on layered solid tori as in [15], [19], and [21]; [21] is co-authored by two of the present authors but is a published, independent derivation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported to force a choice, and no equation reduces to an input by construction. The one genuine weakness is a correctness gap, not circularity: in Proposition 3.3's composite case the assertion that every simple closed curve meeting the augmented diagram twice must meet it more than twice in a neighbourhood of gamma is justified in only two sentences and is not fully case-analyzed; if that assertion failed, the hyperbolicity criterion could fail for some connected sums. That possible gap does not make the derivation circular, because the claim is neither defined in terms of the target triangulation nor borrowed from the cited hyperbolicity theorem. Accordingly the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical constants are fitted; all tetrahedron counts are explicit bounds derived from the knot diagram. The paper introduces one novel construction element, the folded tetrahedron Delta, but this is a piece of a triangulation, not a new entity with independent evidence requirements. The main load-bearing inputs are prior results on fully augmented links and layered solid tori, most from the authors' own research group; these are published and independently established, so the ledger is clean.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Fully augmented links constructed from prime, twist-reduced diagrams with at least two twist regions are hyperbolic.
    Invoked in Proposition 3.3 via [33, Theorem 6.1]; hyperbolicity is needed for the geometric decomposition in Lemma 3.4.
  • domain assumption Hyperbolic fully augmented link complements admit the ideal polyhedral decomposition described in [27], [34], and [19].
    Used in Lemma 3.4 to obtain the initial ideal triangulation with 2*(6c-4) tetrahedra.
  • domain assumption Sakuma-Weeks triangulations of hyperbolic 2-bridge knot complements contain a face spanning a meridian.
    Used in Proposition 3.1 for 2-bridge knots, citing [36] and [16].
  • domain assumption Layered solid tori along the Farey triangulation realize 1/n Dehn fillings with at most |n|-1 added tetrahedra.
    Used in Lemma 3.6, citing [15] and [21].
  • standard math Every knot has a twist-reduced diagram obtained by flypes, and knots decompose uniquely into prime summands.
    Standard knot theory used in Proposition 3.3 to reduce to prime diagrams and handle connected sums.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Triangulations of the 3-sphere with knotted edge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JPMCT5OB

@misc{pith2026241118938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Triangulations of the 3-sphere with knotted edge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JPMCT5OB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18938}
}
abstract

We prove that for any knot $K$, there exists a one-vertex triangulation of the $3$-sphere containing an edge forming $K$. The proof is constructive, and based on fully augmented links. We use our method to produce ``complicated'' simplicial triangulations of the $3$-sphere that we show are smallest possible, up to a constant multiplicative factor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18938 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. The tetrahedron ∆ to be inserted has faces s and s ′ glued to the cut-open face T that was spanning the meridian. The faces labelled m are folded over the edge E illustrated in black, which becomes the knot. Theorem 2.1. Let M be a closed orientable 3-manifold, K a knot in M, and T an ideal triangulation of M − K. Moreover, let T be a face of T that spans a meridian of N(K). Then inserting the folded tetrahedron ∆ a… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. (A) Start with cusp neighbourhood where i = 1 and j = 2 or i = 2 and j = 1. (B) Cut along face T to unglue face ∆1(013) from ∆2(013). When we attach the new tetrahedron ∆ of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Glue faces ∆1(013) and ∆2(013) to faces s (orange) and s ′ (green) of ∆. The new vertices at left and right are ends of E. We then identify the double arrowed edges and the single arrowed edges. The result is a disc with two sides, coming from faces labelled m, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Result. identified, creating a sphere. □ Lemma 2.4. Let M′ be a closed manifold with a one-vertex triangulation T obtained from M −K with distinguished edge E described in Lemma 2.3. Then the complement of a tubular neighbourhood of E is a manifold homeomorphic to M …
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: An illustration of the proof of Lemma 2.4. Dotted blue lines bound a disc in N(E). In (B,C), the pairs of dotted blue lines are identified. Lemma 2.5. Inserting tetrahedron ∆ performs Dehn filling on M − N(K), where the slope of the Dehn filling corresponds to the sl…
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: (A) A flat fully augmented link. (B) A knot with three twist regions, with twist regions marked in blue. (C) Add crossing circles to augment the knot. (D) The corresponding fully augmented link. We generalise Proposition 3.1 to any knot in the 3-sphere by relating kn…
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Left to right: augmenting a (2, q)-torus knot to a hyperbolic fully augmented link; an example of a fully augmented link with a diagram that is not prime; adjustment of the diagram to produce a hyperbolic fully augmented link. If the diagram is not prime, by definiti…
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: The decomposition of a hyperbolic fully augmented link into polyhedra, from [19]. (A) (B) (C) (D) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3_3.png]
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: (A) Three important ideal edges on a crossing disc. (B) Lifting the ideal vertex corresponding to a crossing circle to infinity in the upper half space model, viewed from ∞, with the green rectangle closest to the viewer and highest in upper half space. The dashed ci…
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: When the crossing disc meets a half twist, the fundamental region is the same, but the face pairing shears the cusp torus. The cusp triangulation is shown on the right. tetrahedra in total. See [19, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3_5.png]
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6: (A) The three tetrahedra making up a triangulated prism, (B) the tetrahedra stacked into the triangulated prism, (C) the two triangles facing the crossing circle cusp, (D) the edges corresponding to blue and pink edges shown on the crossing disc in the fully augmente…
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.7. Figure 3.7: (A) Two tetrahedra to layer onto the two-punctured torus (B) as shown on the cusp neighbourhood, (C) as a result we have two triangles facing the crossing circle cusp. (D) The edges corresponding to blue and pink edges shown on the crossing disc in the fully augmente…
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Fully augmented link diagram of a t-fold connected sum of trefoils. Passing to the second derived subdivision of the triangulation from Corollary 4.3 imme￾diately yields the following result. Corollary 4.4. There exists a 242 · (48t − 19) tetrahedron simplicial trian…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kashaev, A TQFT from quantum Teichm¨ uller theory, Comm

    Jørgen Ellegaard Andersen and Rinat M. Kashaev, A TQFT from quantum Teichm¨ uller theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 330 (2014), no. 3, 887–934. MR 3227503

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Combinatorial Theory Ser

    David Barnette, The triangulations of the 3-sphere with up to 8 vertices, J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A 14 (1973), 37–52. MR 312511

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    14 (2023), no

    Fathi Ben Aribi, Fran¸ cois Gu´ eritaud, and Eiichi Piguet-Nakazawa, Geometric triangulations and the Teichm¨ uller TQFT volume conjecture for twist knots , Quantum Topol. 14 (2023), no. 2, 285–406. MR 4636640

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Bruno Benedetti, Discrete Morse theory for manifolds with boundary , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), no. 12, 6631–6670. MR 2958950

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Lutz, Knots in collapsible and non-collapsible balls , Electron

    Bruno Benedetti and Frank H. Lutz, Knots in collapsible and non-collapsible balls , Electron. J. Combin. 20 (2013), no. 3, Paper 31, 29. MR 3104529

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Ziegler, On locally constructible spheres and balls , Acta Math

    Bruno Benedetti and G¨ unter M. Ziegler, On locally constructible spheres and balls , Acta Math. 206 (2011), 205–243

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Graham, M

    Anders Bj¨ orner, Topological methods, Handbook of Combinatorics (R. Graham, M. Gr¨ otschel, and L. Lov´ asz, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 1819–1872

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Burton, Ryan Budney, Will Pettersson, et al., Regina: Software for 3-manifold topology and normal surface theory , http://regina-normal.github.io/, 1999–2023

    Benjamin A. Burton, Ryan Budney, Will Pettersson, et al., Regina: Software for 3-manifold topology and normal surface theory , http://regina-normal.github.io/, 1999–2023

    work page 1999

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Benjamin A. Burton and Alexander He, Finding large counterexamples by selectively exploring the pach- ner graph, Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2023) 18 DIONNE IBARRA, DANIEL V. MATHEWS, JESSICA S. PURCELL, AND JONATHAN SPREER (...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Richard Ehrenborg and Masahiro Hachimori, Non-constructible complexes and the bridge index , Euro- pean J. Combin. 22 (2001), no. 4, 475–489. MR 1829741

    2001

  3. [11]

    Robin Forman, Morse theory for cell complexes , Adv. Math. 134 (1998), no. 1, 90–145

    1998

  4. [12]

    , A user’s guide to discrete Morse theory , S´ em. Lothar. Combin.48 (2002), Art. B48c, 35

    2002

  5. [13]

    Purcell, Dehn filling, volume, and the Jones polyno- mial, J

    David Futer, Efstratia Kalfagianni, and Jessica S. Purcell, Dehn filling, volume, and the Jones polyno- mial, J. Differential Geom. 78 (2008), no. 3, 429–464. MR 2396249

    2008

  6. [14]

    Purcell, Links with no exceptional surgeries , Comment

    David Futer and Jessica S. Purcell, Links with no exceptional surgeries , Comment. Math. Helv. 82 (2007), no. 3, 629–664. MR MR2314056 (2008k:57008)

    2007

  7. [15]

    Fran¸ cois Gu´ eritaud and Saul Schleimer,Canonical triangulations of Dehn fillings , Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), no. 1, 193–242. MR 2578304

    2010

  8. [16]

    Fran¸ cois Gu´ eritaud,On canonical triangulations of once-punctured torus bundles and two-bridge link complements, Geom. Topol. 10 (2006), 1239–1284, With an appendix by David Futer. MR 2255497

    2006

  9. [17]

    Knot Theory Ram- ifications 13 (2004), no

    Masahiro Hachimori and Koya Shimokawa, Tangle sum and constructible spheres , J. Knot Theory Ram- ifications 13 (2004), no. 3, 373–383. MR 2061175

    2004

  10. [18]

    Ziegler, Decompositons of simplicial balls and spheres with knots consisting of few edges , Math

    Masahiro Hachimori and G¨ unter M. Ziegler, Decompositons of simplicial balls and spheres with knots consisting of few edges , Math. Z. 235 (2000), no. 1, 159–171. MR 1785077

    2000

  11. [19]

    Ham and Jessica S

    Sophie L. Ham and Jessica S. Purcell, Geometric triangulations and highly twisted links , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 23 (2023), no. 3, 1399–1462. MR 4598810

    2023

  12. [20]

    Alexander He, Eric Sedgwick, and Jonathan Spreer, Certifying that a knot is composite , 2024, In prepa- ration

    2024

  13. [21]

    Howie, Daniel V

    Joshua A. Howie, Daniel V. Mathews, and Jessica S. Purcell, A-polynomials, Ptolemy varieties, and Dehn filling , Algebr. Geom. Topol. (to appear), arXiv:2002.10356, 2020

    2002 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dionne Ibarra, Daniel Mathews, and Jessica Purcell, On triangulations of double twist knots , 2024, In preparation

    2024

  15. [23]

    Hyam Rubinstein, 0 -efficient triangulations of 3-manifolds , J

    William Jaco and J. Hyam Rubinstein, 0 -efficient triangulations of 3-manifolds , J. Differential Geom. 65 (2003), no. 1, 61–168. MR 2057531

    2003

  16. [24]

    Kashaev, Quantum dilogarithm as a 6j-symbol, Modern Phys

    Rinat M. Kashaev, Quantum dilogarithm as a 6j-symbol, Modern Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994), no. 40, 3757–

    1994

  17. [25]

    , The hyperbolic volume of knots from the quantum dilogarithm , Lett. Math. Phys. 39 (1997), no. 3, 269–275. MR 1434238

    1997

  18. [26]

    Kashaev, Feng Luo, and Grigory Vartanov, A TQFT of Turaev-Viro type on shaped triangu- lations, Ann

    Rinat M. Kashaev, Feng Luo, and Grigory Vartanov, A TQFT of Turaev-Viro type on shaped triangu- lations, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e17 (2016), no. 5, 1109–1143. MR 3486430

    2016

  19. [27]

    London Math

    Marc Lackenby, The volume of hyperbolic alternating link complements , Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 88 (2004), no. 1, 204–224, With an appendix by Ian Agol and Dylan Thurston

    2004

  20. [28]

    W. B. Raymond Lickorish, Unshellable triangulations of spheres , European J. Combin. 12 (1991), no. 6, 527–530. MR 1136394

    1991

  21. [29]

    Lutz, Small examples of nonconstructible simplicial balls and spheres, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 18 (2004), no

    Frank H. Lutz, Small examples of nonconstructible simplicial balls and spheres, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 18 (2004), no. 1, 103–109

    2004

  22. [30]

    Discrete Math

    , Small examples of nonconstructible simplicial balls and spheres , SIAM J. Discrete Math. 18 (2004), no. 1, 103–109. MR 2112491

    2004

  23. [31]

    9, Springer, Berlin, 2007

    Sergei Matveev, Algorithmic topology and classification of 3-manifolds, second ed., Algorithms and Com- putation in Mathematics, vol. 9, Springer, Berlin, 2007. MR 2341532

    2007

  24. [32]

    186 (2001), no

    Hitoshi Murakami and Jun Murakami, The colored Jones polynomials and the simplicial volume of a knot, Acta Math. 186 (2001), no. 1, 85–104. MR 1828373

    2001

  25. [33]

    Purcell, Cusp shapes under cone deformation , J

    Jessica S. Purcell, Cusp shapes under cone deformation , J. Differential Geom. 80 (2008), no. 3, 453–500. MR MR2472480

    2008

  26. [34]

    Math., vol

    , An introduction to fully augmented links , Interactions between hyperbolic geometry, quan- tum topology and number theory, Contemp. Math., vol. 541, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, pp. 205–220. MR 2796634

    2011

  27. [35]

    209, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, [2020] ©2020

    , Hyperbolic knot theory , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 209, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, [2020] ©2020. MR 4249621 TRIANGULATIONS OF THE 3-SPHERE WITH KNOTTED EDGE 19

    2020

  28. [36]

    Makoto Sakuma and Jeffrey Weeks, Examples of canonical decompositions of hyperbolic link complements, Japan. J. Math. (N.S.) 21 (1995), no. 2, 393–439. MR 1364387

    1995

  29. [37]

    3 (Geometries), 1922, pp

    Ernst Steinitz, Iiiab12: Polyeder und raumeinteilungen , Encyclop¨ adie der mathematischen Wis- senschaften, vol. 3 (Geometries), 1922, pp. 1–139

    1922

  30. [38]

    Thurston, The geometry and topology of three-manifolds, Princeton Univ

    William P. Thurston, The geometry and topology of three-manifolds, Princeton Univ. Math. Dept. Notes, 1979

    1979

  31. [39]

    Ziegler,Lectures on polytopes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, no

    G¨ unter M. Ziegler,Lectures on polytopes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, no. 152, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. School of Mathematics, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia. Email address : dionne.ibarra@monash.edu School of Mathematics, Monash University, VIC 3800, Austr...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.