Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A Wide and Deep Exploration of Radio Galaxies with Subaru HSC (WERGS). X. The Massive and Passive Nature of Radio Galaxies at $z \sim 4$

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Seven g-dropout radio galaxies at $z\sim4$ are as massive as ultra-steep-spectrum-selected ones and show fast quenching.

desk verdict A careful, well-caveated first systematic sample of g-dropout-selected z~4 radio galaxy candidates with plausible masses, but the absence of spectroscopy and the model-derived UVJ colors mean the headline numbers should be read as candidates, not measurements. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19009 v1 pith:JP5SP3OA submitted 2024-11-28 astro-ph.GA

Yuta Yamamoto , Tohru Nagao , Takuji Yamashita , Hisakazu Uchiyama , Mariko Kubo , Yoshiki Toba , Yuichi Harikane , Kohei Ichikawa
show 3 more authors
Masaru Kajisawa Akatoki Noboriguchi Yoshiaki Ono
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshiftradiogalaxiesLymanbreakphotometricredshiftsstellarmassassemblygalaxyquenchingUVJdiagramspectralindexz~4
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that radio galaxies selected through the Lyman-break technique, rather than by ultra-steep radio spectra, are already massive and passive by $z\sim4$. Cross-matching g-dropout Lyman-break galaxies from the Subaru HSC survey with VLA FIRST radio sources yields 146 candidates, of which seven have optical-to-mid-infrared SEDs consistent with $z\sim4$. SED fitting gives stellar masses between $2.6\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$ and $5.6\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$, with an average of $4.2\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$, similar to previously known USS-selected high-redshift radio galaxies. The rest-frame UVJ diagram places these objects near or in the quiescent region and favors a fast quenching timescale of roughly 0.1 Gyr. If true, this means massive, already-quenched galaxies were present among radio-loud systems at $z\sim4$ even when selection did not require a steep radio spectrum.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the g-dropout Lyman-break selection, which isolates galaxies at $z\sim3.3{-}4.5$ through the color cuts $g-r>1.0$, $r-i<1.0$, and $g-r>1.5(r-i)+0.8$, followed by a 1-arcsec positional match to FIRST radio sources. Among 146 candidates, the 28 with VIKING/UKIDSS near-infrared and unWISE mid-infrared photometry were fitted with X-CIGALE using BC03 stellar population models and delayed star-formation histories; the best-fit SEDs were then used to construct rest-frame UVJ colors. The UVJ diagram with BC03 evolutionary tracks for $\tau=0.1$, $0.5$, and $1.0$ Gyr is the diagnostic that supports the fast-quenching claim.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic redshifts for the seven candidates would settle the claim: if their Lyman-$\alpha$ or rest-frame UV features place them at $z\sim2$ rather than $z\sim3.3{-}4.5$, the claimed stellar masses and fast-quenching timescales at $z\sim4$ would collapse. A definitive test would be deep near-infrared spectroscopy targeting the 4000 Angstrom/Balmer break region expected at $z\sim4$, or detection of a confirmed Lyman-$\alpha$ line at $z\sim3.8{-}4.0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a Lyman-break-selected sample of radio galaxies at $z\sim4$, chosen without requiring an ultra-steep radio spectrum, contains objects with stellar masses of $(2.6{-}5.6)\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$ (average $4.2\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$), placing them at the massive end of the $z\sim4$ galaxy mass function. Their rest-frame UVJ colors, derived from the best-fit SED models, are consistent with a fast past quenching of roughly 0.1 Gyr. The paper also finds that the radio spectral indices among the seven are diverse: four satisfy the USS criterion and three do not, so Lyman-break selection catches radio galaxies that USS surveys miss.

Load-bearing premise

The seven objects are genuinely at $z\sim4$; all redshifts are photometric, and the paper itself notes that fast-quenching galaxies at $z\sim2$ can mimic the near-infrared signature of $z\sim4$ Lyman-break galaxies, which would make the derived masses and quenching timescales invalid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $z\sim4$ radio galaxy population is not confined to ultra-steep-spectrum sources; Lyman-break selection reveals comparable massive galaxies with flatter radio spectra.
  • These objects sit near the massive end of the $z\sim4$ stellar mass function, implying substantial early assembly before cosmic noon.
  • The fast-quenching signal favors a quenching mechanism acting on roughly 0.1 Gyr timescales, such as quasar-mode feedback, over slower radio-mode feedback.
  • Because the sample requires near-infrared and mid-infrared detection, it is biased toward $M_\star>10^{11}\,M_\odot$; the true average mass of Lyman-break-selected high-redshift radio galaxies could be lower.
  • Future deeper infrared surveys can measure the full stellar-mass distribution and test whether Lyman-break-selected and USS-selected high-redshift radio galaxies form one population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be deep near-infrared spectroscopy of the seven candidates to confirm their redshifts; if the photo-$z$ redshifts hold, these objects become prime targets for proto-cluster searches around powerful radio jets.
  • ALMA or submillimeter observations could check whether the modest $E(B-V)$ values from SED fitting hide obscured star formation, which would change the inferred quenching completeness.
  • Comparing the radio luminosity function of Lyman-break-selected high-redshift radio galaxies with the quasar luminosity function at $z\sim4$ could test whether the fast quenching is synchronized with luminous AGN phases.
  • If confirmed, the mass similarity between Lyman-break and USS-selected high-redshift radio galaxies would strengthen the view that such galaxies trace the most massive halos at $z\sim4$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents a search for z~4 radio galaxies by matching g-dropout Lyman-break galaxies selected from ~560 deg^2 of Subaru HSC-SSP data to VLA FIRST radio sources, producing 146 HzRG candidates. Restricting to 28 objects with VIKING or UKIDSS near-infrared and unWISE mid-infrared detections, the authors run X-CIGALE SED fits and select 7 objects with photometric redshifts in 3.3<z<4.5. They report stellar masses of (2.6-5.6)x10^11 Msun with a mean of 4.2x10^11 Msun, and use rest-frame UVJ colors computed from the best-fit SED models to argue for fast quenching on a ~0.1 Gyr timescale. They also use VLASS to measure radio spectral indices and argue that Lyman-break selection finds HzRGs missed by USS-based surveys.

Significance. If the z~4 identification is correct, the paper makes an interesting and useful claim: Lyman-break-selected radio galaxies at z~4 are already as massive and as quenched as USS-selected HzRGs, suggesting that the massive nature is not merely an artifact of USS selection. The authors provide several genuine strengths: a 17,856-model completeness simulation that supports the Mstar>1e11 selection floor, a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis for the UVJ colors, and an sfh2exp robustness check that broadly reproduces the fast-quenching pattern for 5 of 7 objects. The main astrophysical conclusions, however, remain conditional on photometric redshifts and on model-generated UVJ colors; the paper is transparent about both limitations, which is a credit to the authors.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Table 3] The final seven-object sample rests entirely on photometric redshifts. In Section 3.1 the unrestricted X-CIGALE run places the median best-fit redshift of the 28 NIR/MIR-bright candidates at z=2.30, and the text itself cites Kubo et al. (2024) to note that z~2 fast-quenching galaxies show a spectral break near rest 1600 Angstrom that can be misidentified as the near-infrared signature of z~4 galaxies. Since none of the seven objects has a spectroscopic redshift, the restricted 3.3<z<4.5 solution that yields masses of (2.6-5.6)x10^11 Msun is not independently validated. The paper needs either spectroscopic confirmation or a per-object estimate of the z~2 contamination probability (e.g., P(z<3) from the full photo-z posterior) before the conclusions in Section 5 can be stated as established results; the second X-CIGALE run with the redshift window fixed at 3.3-4.5 is a parameter-estimation choice and cannot by itself validate the redshift.
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Figs. 9-12] The rest-frame UVJ colors are not measured from the photometry; they are generated from the best-fit X-CIGALE models. The delayed-SFH grid used for the fits has (tau, age) parameters that directly control whether the modeled galaxy quenches on a 0.1 Gyr or a 1 Gyr timescale, so placing the same model colors on top of BC03 delayed-SFH tracks with different tau values partially restates the input assumptions. The sfh2exp check in Figure 11 is a useful internal consistency test, but it uses the same fitting machinery and therefore does not break the circularity. I would ask the authors to derive U-V and V-J directly from the observed photometry at the adopted photo-z, propagating the photo-z uncertainty, or to use a nonparametric SFH, so that the quenching-timescale claim is testable.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Fig. 7, Sec. 5] The completeness simulation shows that the near- and mid-infrared detection limits impose a strong selection floor at Mstar>1e11 Msun, with completeness roughly 0.4-0.6 for the massive range and near zero below it. Given this floor, the conclusion in Section 5 that 'the massive nature is a general characteristic of HzRGs independent of the selection method' is stronger than the data support. The KS comparison with USS-selected samples (p=1.2e-3) also mixes different SED-fitting codes and excludes objects with mass upper limits. The authors are transparent about the bias in Section 4.1, but the wording of the abstract and conclusions should be tempered to say that the massive nature applies to the NIR/MIR-selected subset.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, Figs. 10 and 12] The Monte Carlo realizations are said to show that fast quenching is preferred, but no quantitative fraction is given. Only ID3 and ID6 formally satisfy the Muzzin et al. (2013) quiescent criteria, while ID2, ID4, and ID7 are near the boundary; without a stated percentage of realizations that fall within the tau=0.1 Gyr track rather than the tau=1.0 Gyr track, the 'rough timescale of 0.1 Gyr' is not statistically supported. Please report the classification probability or a posterior distribution on the effective quenching timescale.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 9 caption] The caption contains the typo 'Furtehr' and should read 'Further'; please proofread the figure captions.
  2. [Sec. 4.4] The text contains 'soruces' where 'sources' is intended; the same typo appears in the VLASS discussion and should be corrected.
  3. [Table 4] The near-infrared columns labeled Ks and K are easy to confuse because the survey (VIKING or UKIDSS) is not repeated in the column headers; please add explicit survey labels or a clearer footnote.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. 5] The abstract and conclusion state the ~0.1 Gyr quenching timescale without mentioning that the UVJ colors are model-derived; please add a caveat or soften the wording.
  5. [Sec. 2.1] The phrase 'convolvedflux 0 20 mag' is not defined in the text; please explain this HSC-SSP magnitude type or cite the relevant documentation.
  6. [Data availability] No data availability statement is included; providing the final photometric catalog and the X-CIGALE configuration would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The fast-quenching conclusion restates the fitted SFH through model-generated UVJ colors; the stellar-mass result itself is not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3 "Rest-frame UVJ color" (Figures 9-10), with best-fit SFH parameters in Table 5.]
    "The rest-frame UVJ magnitudes of our HzRG candidates cannot be measured directly from the observed photometric data. This is because the rest-frame J-band is beyond the WISE W2 band. Therefore we estimated the UVJ magnitudes of our HzRG candidates from the best-fit galaxy spectral model in the SED fitting process."

    The UVJ colors that drive the "fast quenching with ~0.1 Gyr" conclusion are not observed colors; they are generated from the X-CIGALE best-fit model. That model is fit with the sfhdelayed SFH, and Table 5 shows all 7 final candidates have best-fit tau = 10-100 Myr. Plotting these model-generated colors against BC03 delayed-SFH tracks with tau = 0.1 Gyr therefore compares the fitted SFH to itself in a new coordinate system: the UVJ position is a deterministic function of the already-fitted tau and age, so the "evidence from the UVJ diagram" adds no independent constraint and the quoted ~0.1 Gyr timescale is effectively the fitted tau renamed.

full rationale

The paper's stellar-mass claim (Mstar ~ 2.6-5.6 x 10^11 Msun) is a genuine SED-fitting result: the masses are derived from observed HSC+VIKING/UKIDSS+unWISE photometry, the selection-bias analysis uses an independent 17,856-model completeness simulation, and the comparison with USS-selected HzRGs is external. No load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness-import argument appears; Yamashita et al. (2020) and Kubo et al. (2024) are used for method context and a caution about z~2 interlopers, respectively, not to force the conclusions. The identified circularity is limited to the fast-quenching inference in Section 4.3: the rest-frame UVJ colors cannot be measured because the rest-frame J band is outside the observed wavelength coverage, so they are computed from the best-fit X-CIGALE models whose tau parameter already encodes the SFH timescale; concluding ~0.1 Gyr quenching from those model-generated colors is a restatement of the fitted tau, not an independent empirical test. This makes the "passive/fast-quenching" part of the headline claim partially circular, while leaving the massive-galaxy result substantially independent. The need for spectroscopic redshifts is an external validity concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central numbers are outputs of a parameterized SED fitting code, so the ledger is dominated by fitted parameters (mass, tau, age, E(B-V), photo-z) and modeling assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Stellar mass Mstar = (2.6 to 5.6) x 10^11 Msun, average 4.2 x 10^11 Msun (Table 6)
    Fitted output of X-CIGALE SED modeling; the central massive-nature claim depends directly on it.
  • Delayed SFH timescale tau = 10 to 100 Myr for the 7 candidates (Table 5)
    Fitted SFH parameter; the fast-quenching interpretation is essentially a restatement of these small tau values.
  • Stellar population age = 200 to 1000 Myr (Table 5)
    Fitted by X-CIGALE; combined with tau, it sets the quenching timescale.
  • Dust attenuation E(B-V) = Bayesian 0.1 to 0.6 (Table 6)
    Fitted dust parameter; affects the stellar mass and the UVJ colors.
  • Photometric redshift = Best-fit 3.46 to 4.35, Bayesian 3.71 to 4.16 (Tables 3 and 6)
    Fitted by X-CIGALE; sample membership and all derived properties depend on the photo-z.
  • Ionization parameter log U = -4.0 or -2.0 (Table 2)
    Grid choice for nebular emission; has minor effect on optical photometry.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The g-dropout color criteria (g-r>1.0, r-i<1.0, g-r>1.5(r-i)+0.8) select galaxies at 3.3<z<4.5.
    Section 2.3.1, based on Ono et al. (2018) and Harikane et al. (2022).
  • domain assumption Radio galaxies are type-2 AGNs whose rest-frame UV/optical emission is dominated by stars, so the AGN component can be omitted from SED fitting.
    Section 2.4; if AGN light is significant in the fitted bands, stellar masses and UVJ colors would be biased.
  • domain assumption The 1 arcsec HSC-FIRST matching radius has a 14 percent chance-coincidence fraction and 93 percent completeness, following Yamashita et al. (2018).
    Section 2.3.2; the HzRG candidate list inherits this contamination estimate.
  • domain assumption The delayed star-formation history with BC03 stellar population, Chabrier IMF, and solar metallicity adequately describes the SEDs.
    Section 2.4 and Table 2; masses and ages are conditional on these model choices.
  • ad hoc to paper The photometric redshift solution in the range 3.3 to 4.5 is the true redshift, despite the known z~2 fast-quenching galaxy degeneracy.
    Section 3.1; the second X-CIGALE run restricts the redshift search to 3.3 to 4.5, effectively forcing the high-z solution.
  • domain assumption The Calzetti et al. (2000) extinction law with E(B-V) up to 2 applies to these galaxies.
    Section 2.4, Table 2; affects derived masses and UVJ colors.
  • domain assumption The 4 arcsec aperture in VIKING/UKIDSS images captures total flux for the targets, with the y-band comparison showing negligible offsets.
    Section 2.2; near-IR photometry is re-measured rather than taken from catalogs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Wide and Deep Exploration of Radio Galaxies with Subaru HSC (WERGS). X. The Massive and Passive Nature of Radio Galaxies at $z \sim 4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JP5SP3OA

@misc{pith2026241119009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Wide and Deep Exploration of Radio Galaxies with Subaru HSC (WERGS). X. The Massive and Passive Nature of Radio Galaxies at $z \sim 4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JP5SP3OA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19009}
}
abstract

High-$z$ radio galaxies (HzRGs) are considered important objects for understanding the formation and evolution of massive galaxies in the early universe. However, till date, detailed studies of the stellar population of HzRGs such as the star-formation history have been scarce. Therefore, this study conducted a new survey to establish a less-biased sample of HzRGs and consequently investigate their properties. We utilized a sample of $g$-dropout Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) obtained from an optical wide and deep imaging survey made by Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC). Based on the cross-matching of this LBG sample with the VLA FIRST radio survey data, we constructed a photometric sample of high-redshift radio galaxies (HzRGs) at $z \sim 4$ for $\sim$560 deg$^2$ survey field. Consequently, we identified 146 HzRG candidates. To analyze the characteristics of these candidates, we focus on objects exhibiting the near-infrared photometry of VIKING or UKIDSS and the mid-infrared photometry of unWISE (28 objects). The results indicate that 7 objects exhibit SEDs consistent with galaxies at $z \sim 4$. The HzRG candidates have very large stellar masses with $\sim 4.2 \times 10^{11} M_{\odot}$ on average. This stellar mass is similar to that of previously discovered USS HzRGs at $z \sim 4$, though our sample is affected by a sample selection bias that selects only HzRGs with $M_{\star} > 10^{11} M_{\odot}$. Further, the SEDs of those HzRG candidates suggest a past fast quenching with a rough timescale of $\sim$0.1 Gyr, as evidenced from the rest-frame UVJ diagram.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19009 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of g − r and r − i colors. The black dots denote sources with spectroscopic redshift within the range of 0.1 < zsp < 3.0, provided in the spectroscopic catalog of HSC-SSP S19A. The red dots show the 146 HzRG candidates, and the red stars denote the 7 finally selected HzRG candidates for the SED analysis (see Section 2.4). and FIRST samples. Yamashita et al. (2018) reported that, through the adoption of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of i-band magnitude for 184 HzRG candidates. Blue histogram shows all the 184 HzRG candi￾dates, red shows 11 low-z galaxies selected as HzRG candi￾dates, and yellow shows the 12 spectroscopically-confirmed high-z quasars. unWISE. First, we obtained unWISE mid-infrared data for 75 objects among the 146 HzRG candidates. These 75 sources were detected in W1 and/or W2 bands with >5 σ, whereas the other 71 s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Best-fit redshift distribution of 28 HzRG candi￾dates. that fast-quenching galaxies at z ∼ 2 exhibited a spec￾tral break at λrest ∼ 1600 ˚A, which can be misidentified as the bright near-infrared feature of z ∼ 4 galaxies. We selected objects exhibiting the photometric redshift in the range of 3.3 < zph < 4.5 as the final HzRG candi￾dates, based on the SED fit with X-CIGALE (Sections 2.3.1 and 2.4). This redshift ra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Images of the 7 HzRG candidates of HSC-SSP, VIKING or UKIDSS, unWISE, and FIRST, from left to right. The HSC-SSP grizy and VIKING JHKS or UKIDSS JHK images are shown with a width of 8′′, and subsequently the WISE W1W2 and FIRST 1.4 GHz images with a width of 20′′. Nort…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SED fitting results for the 7 HzRG candidates. Black lines represent the best-fit SED models. Filled red circles denote the photometric data measured with HSC, VIKING (ID 1, 2, 3, and 4) or UKIDSS (ID 5, 6, and 7), and unWISE, while red arrows denote the 2 σ upper limi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The upper panel shows the observed-frame SED of the 9 high-z quasars (black) and the median SED of those 9 high-z quasars (red) with the photometric data of HSC, VIKING or UKIDSS, and unWISE, normalized by the unWISE W1 flux. The lower panel compares the rest-frame SED…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Number of all models as a function of the stellar mass of galaxies. Panels (b)–(f) show the number of input models (black histogram), models satisfying the criterion (red histogram), and the fraction of galaxies satisfying the criterion (black solid line), as a fun…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stellar mass and redshift for the final HzRG candidate sample (red stars). The blue filled circle denotes the HzRG selected by the r-dropout Lyman break technique (Yamashita et al. 2020). The black plots denote the stellar mass of HzRGs (triangles; De Breuck et al. 201…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Rest-frame UVJ diagram. The red stars denote the colors of the 7 HzRG candidates, estimated using the best-fit X-CIGALE models. The black line is the bound￾ary for selecting passive galaxies reported by Muzzin et al. (2013). Galaxy evolutionary tracks of BC03 are also …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The rest-frame 1.4GHz radio luminosity as a function of the redshift. The red stars denote the 7 final HzRG candidates. The filled-blue circle denotes the radio galaxy at z = 4.72 selected by the r-dropout Lyman break (Yamashita et al. 2020). For comparison, the black…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Jet Power and Star Formation Are Uncorrelated in Active Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Powerful jets and star formation rates appear uncorrelated because AGN spend an early phase with decreasing jet power and rising star formation, then a later phase with rising jet power and falling star formation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    K., Ag¨ ueros, M

    Abazajian, K., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 502, doi: 10.1086/421365

    doi:10.1086/421365 2004

  2. [2]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S8, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx081

    Aihara, H., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S8, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx081

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx081 2018

  3. [3]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 247, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y., Ando, M., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 247, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  4. [4]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S34, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx091

    Akiyama, M., He, W., Ikeda, H., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S34, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx091

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx091 2018

  5. [5]

    K., Kelvin, L

    Andrews, S. K., Kelvin, L. S., Driver, S. P., & Robotham, A. S. G. 2014, PASA, 31, e004, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2013.41

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2013.41 2014

  6. [6]

    J., Parker, L

    Arnaboldi, M., Neeser, M. J., Parker, L. C., et al. 2007, The Messenger, 127, 28

    2007

  7. [7]

    H., White, R

    Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559, doi: 10.1086/176166

    doi:10.1086/176166 1995

  8. [8]

    B., & Ellis, R

    Belli, S., Newman, A. B., & Ellis, R. S. 2019, ApJ, 874, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab07af

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab07af 2019

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    N., & Heckman, T

    Best, P. N., & Heckman, T. M. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1569, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20414.x

    2012

  2. [12]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    2019 doi

  3. [13]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    2018 doi

  4. [14]

    W., Drouart, G., Seymour, N., et al

    Broderick, J. W., Drouart, G., Seymour, N., et al. 2022, PASA, 39, e061, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.42

    2022 doi

  5. [17]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  6. [18]

    2007, A&A, 467, 777, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066514

    Casali, M., Adamson, A., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 777, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066514

    2007 doi

  7. [19]

    2009, ApJ, 695, 292, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/292

    Ceverino, D., & Klypin, A. 2009, ApJ, 695, 292, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/292

    2009 doi

  8. [20]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  9. [21]

    C., Miley, G

    Chambers, K. C., Miley, G. K., van Breugel, W. J. M., et al. 1996, ApJS, 106, 247, doi: 10.1086/192338

    1996 doi

  10. [22]

    Clarke, C., & Oey, M. S. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1299, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05976.x

    2002

  11. [23]

    M., Negus, J., M¨ uller-S´ anchez, F., et al

    Comerford, J. M., Negus, J., M¨ uller-S´ anchez, F., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb2ae

    2020 doi

  12. [24]

    Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 575, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043

    1992

  13. [25]

    Kurk, J. D. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3262, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu522

    2014 doi

  14. [27]

    J., Khochfar, S., et al

    Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., Khochfar, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 3218, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty469

    2018 doi

  15. [28]

    B., Caldwell, M., Ward, A

    Dalton, G. B., Caldwell, M., Ward, A. K., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6269, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. I. S. McLean & M. Iye, 62690X, doi: 10.1117/12.670018

    2006 doi

  16. [29]

    2017, A&A, 605, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419 De Breuck, C., van Breugel, W., R¨ ottgering, H

    Davidzon, I., Ilbert, O., Laigle, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419 De Breuck, C., van Breugel, W., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., &

    2017 doi

  17. [30]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 303, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000181 De Breuck, C., van Breugel, W., Stanford, S

    Miley, G. 2000, A&AS, 143, 303, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000181 De Breuck, C., van Breugel, W., Stanford, S. A., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 637, doi: 10.1086/324632 18 Yamamoto et al. De Breuck, C., Seymour, N., Stern, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 36, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/36

    2000 doi

  18. [32]

    A., et al

    Dye, S., Lawrence, A., Read, M. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 5113, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2622

    2018 doi

  19. [33]

    2013, The Messenger, 154, 32

    Edge, A., Sutherland, W., Kuijken, K., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 154, 32

    2013

  20. [34]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    2012 doi

  21. [35]

    1997, A&A, 326, 950, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9707017 Garate-Nu˜ nez, L

    Fioc, M., & Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1997, A&A, 326, 950, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9707017 Garate-Nu˜ nez, L. P., Robotham, A. S. G., Bellstedt, S.,

    1997 doi arXiv

  22. [36]

    Davies, L. J. M., & Mart ´ ınez-Lombilla, C. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1292

    2024 doi

  23. [37]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S11, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx097

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Ono, Y., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S11, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx097

    2018 doi

  24. [38]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

    Harikane, Y., Ono, Y., Ouchi, M., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

    2022 doi

  25. [40]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/15

    Tanaka, I. 2012, ApJ, 757, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/15

    2012 doi

  26. [41]

    J., White, R

    Helfand, D. J., White, R. L., & Becker, R. H. 2015, ApJ, 801, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/26

    2015 doi

  27. [42]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., & Kereˇ s, D. 2008, ApJS, 175, 356, doi: 10.1086/524362

    2008 doi

  28. [43]

    2021, ApJ, 921, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b26

    Ichikawa, K., Yamashita, T., Toba, Y., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1b26

    2021 doi

  29. [44]

    2023, A&A, 672, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244271

    Ichikawa, K., Yamashita, T., Merloni, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244271

    2023 doi

  30. [45]

    Inoue, A. K. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2920, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x

    2011

  31. [46]

    J., Tadhunter, C

    Inskip, K. J., Tadhunter, C. N., Morganti, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1739, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17002.x

    2010

  32. [47]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd95

    Ishikawa, S., Kashikawa, N., Tanaka, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd95

    2020 doi

  33. [48]

    J., Teimourian, H., Simpson, C., et al

    Jarvis, M. J., Teimourian, H., Simpson, C., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, L83, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00715.x

    2009

  34. [49]

    J., Rawlings, S., Lacy, M., et al

    Jarvis, M. J., Rawlings, S., Lacy, M., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1563, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2001.04726.x

    2001

  35. [50]

    2018, PASJ, 70, 66, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy056

    Kawanomoto, S., Uraguchi, F., Komiyama, Y., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 66, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy056

    2018 doi

  36. [51]

    King, A. R. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1516, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16013.x

    2010

  37. [52]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  38. [53]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 403, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3210 Labb´ e, I., Huang, J., Franx, M., et al

    Kubo, M., Nagao, T., Uchiyama, H., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 403, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3210 Labb´ e, I., Huang, J., Franx, M., et al. 2005, ApJL, 624, L81, doi: 10.1086/430700

    2024 doi

  39. [54]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

    2020 doi

  40. [55]

    2014, AJ, 147, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/108

    Lang, D. 2014, AJ, 147, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/108

    2014 doi

  41. [56]

    J., Almaini, O., et al

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x Le Fevre, O., Deltorn, J. M., Crampton, D., & Dickinson, M. 1996, ApJL, 471, L11, doi: 10.1086/310319

    2007

  42. [57]

    J., & Longair, M

    Lilly, S. J., & Longair, M. S. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 1053, doi: 10.1093/mnras/199.4.1053

    1982 doi

  43. [58]

    1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    1998 doi

  44. [59]

    M., et al

    Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/30 Ma lek, K., Pollo, A., Takeuchi, T. T., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321665

    2014 doi

  45. [60]

    M., et al

    Mao, Z., Kodama, T., P´ erez-Mart ´ ınez, J. M., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243733

    2022 doi

  46. [61]

    Marconi, A., & Hunt, L. K. 2003, ApJL, 589, L21, doi: 10.1086/375804

    2003 doi

  47. [62]

    2008, A&A Rv, 15, 67, doi: 10.1007/s00159-007-0008-z

    Miley, G., & De Breuck, C. 2008, A&A Rv, 15, 67, doi: 10.1007/s00159-007-0008-z

    2008 doi

  48. [63]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx063

    Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Kawanomoto, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx063

    2018 doi

  49. [64]

    N., & Oosterloo, T

    Morganti, R., Tadhunter, C. N., & Oosterloo, T. A. 2005, A&A, 444, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500197

    2005 doi

  50. [65]

    2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    Muzzin, A., Marchesini, D., Stefanon, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    2013 doi

  51. [66]

    Nesvadba, N. P. H., Drouart, G., De Breuck, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629357

    2017 doi

  52. [67]

    2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    2009 doi

  53. [68]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  54. [69]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S10, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx103

    Ono, Y., Ouchi, M., Harikane, Y., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S10, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx103

    2018 doi

  55. [70]

    Odewahn, S. C. 1996, Nature, 383, 45, doi: 10.1038/383045a0

    1996 doi

  56. [71]

    B., Soifer, B

    Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., et al. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74, doi: 10.1086/165983

    1988 doi

  57. [72]

    A., et al

    Saxena, A., Marinello, M., Overzier, R. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2733, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1996

    2018 doi

  58. [73]

    Saxena, A., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., Duncan, K. J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5053, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2516 The nature of radio galaxies atz ∼ 4 19

    2019 doi

  59. [74]

    F., Meisner, A

    Schlafly, E. F., Meisner, A. M., & Green, G. M. 2019, ApJS, 240, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aafbea

    2019 doi

  60. [75]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  61. [76]

    2007, ApJS, 171, 353, doi: 10.1086/517887

    Seymour, N., Stern, D., De Breuck, C., et al. 2007, ApJS, 171, 353, doi: 10.1086/517887

    2007 doi

  62. [77]

    P., Filipovi´ c, M

    Shobhana, D., Norris, R. P., Filipovi´ c, M. D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4902, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3319

    2023 doi

  63. [78]

    J., Simmons, B

    Smethurst, R. J., Simmons, B. D., Coil, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3985, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2340

    2021 doi

  64. [79]

    2005, MNRAS, 361, 776, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x

    Springel, V., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 776, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x

    2005

  65. [80]

    P., Schenker, M

    Stark, D. P., Schenker, M. A., Ellis, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 129, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/129

    2013 doi

  66. [81]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S9, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx077

    Tanaka, M., Coupon, J., Hsieh, B.-C., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S9, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx077

    2018 doi

  67. [82]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab238d

    Toba, Y., Yamashita, T., Nagao, T., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab238d

    2019 doi

  68. [83]

    2020, ApJ, 899, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9cb7

    Toba, Y., Goto, T., Oi, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9cb7

    2020 doi

  69. [84]

    2022a, PASJ, 74, L27, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac075 —

    Uchiyama, H., Yamashita, T., Nagao, T., et al. 2022a, PASJ, 74, L27, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac075 —. 2022b, ApJ, 934, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac77ee

    doi

  70. [85]

    P., R¨ ottgering, H

    Venemans, B. P., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., Miley, G. K., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 823, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053941

    2007 doi

  71. [86]

    J., Quadri, R

    Williams, R. J., Quadri, R. F., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P., & Labb´ e, I. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1879, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1879

    2009 doi

  72. [87]

    J., Rawlings, S., Jarvis, M

    Willott, C. J., Rawlings, S., Jarvis, M. J., & Blundell, K. M. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 173, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06172.x

    2003

  73. [88]

    2021, A&A, 647, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039724

    Wolf, J., Nandra, K., Salvato, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039724

    2021 doi

  74. [89]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  75. [90]

    2007, ApJ, 655, 51, doi: 10.1086/509708

    Wuyts, S., Labb´ e, I., Franx, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 51, doi: 10.1086/509708

    2007 doi

  76. [91]

    Wyithe, J. S. B., & Loeb, A. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2741, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts242

    2013 doi

  77. [92]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae1ac

    Yamashita, T., Nagao, T., Akiyama, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae1ac

    2018 doi

  78. [93]

    2020, AJ, 160, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab98fe

    Yamashita, T., Nagao, T., Ikeda, H., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab98fe

    2020 doi

  79. [94]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3001

    Yang, G., Boquien, M., Buat, V., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3001

    2020 doi

  80. [95]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.