Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

On the origin of the Hercules group: II. the Trojan quasi-periodic identity on the orbital level

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a slow, long bar model, quasi-periodic Trojan orbits around the L4/L5 Lagrange points carry inner-Galactic stars over the bar's effective-potential rim into the solar neighbourhood and produce the Hercules kinematic group.

desk verdict A careful orbital-level study of the Trojan-origin idea for Hercules, but the central claim stands or falls with the slow-bar pattern speed, which the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19097 v2 pith:YX6Z7HXP submitted 2024-11-28 astro-ph.GA

Yusen Li , Kenneth Freeman , Helmut Jerjen This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HerculeskinematicgroupGalacticbarTrojanorbitsLagrangepointsL4/L5corotationresonancesolarneighbourhoodkinematicspatternspeedquasi-periodic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to explain the Hercules group — a dense patch of solar-neighbourhood stars with unusually low angular momentum and a systematic bias toward outward radial velocity — together with the iron-rich, alpha-poor chemistry that marks these stars as immigrants from the inner Galaxy. Its claim is that Hercules stars ride quasi-periodic orbits trapped around stable periodic 'Trojan' orbits at the L4/L5 Lagrange points of the Milky Way's long, slowly rotating bar, at its corotation resonance. In the authors' potential model the effective potential has the shape of a volcano, and the Trojan families are the only common orbits that cross its rim, so they act as an ordered conveyor that lifts inner-bar stars over the barrier and drops them into the solar neighbourhood with the observed kinematics. The case is built from 12-Gyr numerical orbit integrations, Poincaré surfaces of section that show the families' strong stability, and mock observations that map the orbits into the $L_Z$–$V_R$ plane, reproducing the four Hercules subgroups and matching the chemical fingerprints found in the companion paper. If the claim is right, one of the most-studied kinematic structures near the Sun becomes a direct, ordered signature of the Galactic bar's corotation resonance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Trojan quasi-periodic orbit: a trajectory trapped around one of the two stable periodic orbit families that librate about the L4 Lagrange point (and its centrosymmetric partner L5) of the barred potential, which sits at the bar's corotation resonance. These points are maxima of the effective potential, whose 'volcano' rim they form together with the L1/L2 saddle points; the Jacobi integral $E_J = E - \Omega_b L_Z$ is the only conserved quantity, and its value selects which orbit family a star belongs to. The machinery runs on three tools: numerical integration of the equations of motion in the corotating frame of a Ferrers bar (an inhomogeneous prolate spheroid with density $\rho = \rho_0(1-m^2)^2$) plus a logarithmic disc-halo potential; Poincaré surfaces of section cut at $\dot{y} = 0$ that map the stability of the orbit families across $E_J$; and mock observations that record the $L_Z$ and $V_R$ of every orbit as it crosses the solar-neighbourhood cylinder, connecting phase-space morphology to the observed kinematics. The spectral decomposition of the orbits into a fast ($\sim 9\ \mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$) and a slow ($\sim 1\ \mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$) mode is what lets a single family morph from a near-circular 'thickened' orbit into a banana-shaped extended orbit, and it is the extended QPOs that reach the Sun and build the Hercules signal.

What would settle it

A decisive single observation is a secure, model-independent measurement of the bar's pattern speed: a value clearly above the adopted 40 km/s/kpc, which places corotation inside the solar circle, would move the L4/L5 Trojan orbits inside the Sun's orbit and falsify the mechanism, since the Trojan orbits would no longer reach the solar neighbourhood.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the Hercules group is the orbital-level manifestation of the bar's corotation resonance. In a potential built from a Ferrers bar (semi-major axis about 5 kpc) plus a logarithmic disc-halo component, rotating with pattern speed $\Omega_b = 40\ \mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,kpc^{-1}}$, the L4 and L5 Lagrange points on the bar's minor axis trap two families of retrograde periodic orbits: a fast, near-circular family with frequency about $9\ \mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$, and a slow, banana-shaped family of about $1\ \mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$ that hugs the zero-velocity curve. Both families are stable, and quasi-periodic orbits around them — especially the strongly extended QPOs of the fast family — can wander up to 5 kpc from the parent orbit, far enough to pass through the solar-neighbourhood cylinder. Mock-observed there, these orbits populate the $L_Z$–$V_R$ plane in a boomerang-shaped region that matches the Hercules over-density and its outward $V_R$ bias: lower-energy orbits feed the high-$L_Z$ subgroups, while higher-energy orbits feed the low-$L_Z$, more metal-rich subgroups III and IV. The effective potential has the topology of a volcano whose rim, formed by the L4/L5 maxima and the L1/L2 saddle points, blocks most orbits from crossing between the inner and outer galaxy; the Trojan families are the rim-crossers, making them the natural ordered transport mechanism for the inner-Galactic chemical population identified in the companion paper.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the adopted bar parameters — a bar about 5 kpc long rotating at about 40 km/s/kpc — which place corotation, and with it the Trojan orbits at L4/L5, outside the Sun's orbit; if the bar is instead short and fast, corotation lies inside the solar circle and the Trojans never reach the solar neighbourhood, a sensitivity the authors flag in Sections 2.2 and 4.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The four Hercules subgroups are slices of one dynamical family rather than separate populations: low-$E_J$ quasi-periodic orbits map onto the high-$L_Z$ subgroups (I and II), and high-$E_J$ orbits onto the low-$L_Z$, metal-rich subgroups III and IV.
  • Inner-bar stars reach the solar neighbourhood by ordered rim-crossing transport, so no stochastic radial migration is needed to explain the Hercules chemistry.
  • The same barred potential reproduces other nearby kinematic groups (the Arch/Hat and Hyades structures) from other orbit families, pointing toward one unified orbital mechanism for the near-Sun kinematic groups.
  • Because the Trojan families stay stable across a wide parameter range, their existence alone cannot fix the bar's pattern speed, but their mapped kinematics in the solar neighbourhood can constrain it.
  • Any disc galaxy hosting a long, slow bar should show analogous Trojan kinematic structures at corotation, visible in surveys of disc neighbourhoods other than the Sun's.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable 3D extension: stars deposited in the solar neighbourhood by rim-crossing Trojan QPOs should carry a vertical kinematic signature tied to the phase of their rim crossing, unlike stars brought in by radial migration — something the paper's planar model cannot see but a 3D run could check.
  • If the transport is as ordered as claimed, the iron-abundance gradient across the Hercules subgroups should be sharper than diffusive radial migration would produce, since Trojan capture preserves phase information rather than scrambling it.
  • The volcano-rim picture generalizes to external galaxies: barred discs viewed in line-of-sight velocity fields should show corotation-radius kinematic anomalies where the rim crosses the disc plane, offering a way to find Trojan traps beyond the Milky Way.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the Hercules kinematic group in the solar neighbourhood is produced by quasi-periodic Trojan orbits trapped around stable periodic orbit families at the L4/L5 Lagrange points of a slowly rotating, long Galactic bar. The authors construct a planar Ferrers-bar plus logarithmic disc/halo potential with bar semi-major axis a = 5.1 kpc and pattern speed Omega_b = 40 km/s/kpc, integrate orbits in the rotating frame, and map the SNd passages of selected quasi-periodic orbits into the L_Z-V_R plane. They find that such orbits can cover the observed Hercules subgroups with a positive V_R bias and lower L_Z, and they use surfaces of section to argue that the fast Trojan family is dynamically stable over a wide range of Jacobi integral. The paper connects this dynamics to the chemical signatures reported in Paper I and concludes that Trojan orbits are the most likely origin of Hercules.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides an orbital-level mechanism for the Hercules group in the slow-bar scenario, complementing the chemical analysis of Paper I and offering a concrete alternative to the OLR interpretation. The numerical work is careful: Jacobi integral conservation is checked to six significant figures, the surfaces of section are generated systematically, and the code for the Ferrers potential is publicly available. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction that Trojan-related kinematic signatures should appear in other Galactic neighbourhoods, which is a strength. However, the significance is limited by two load-bearing gaps: the SNd match is demonstrated only with a few hand-selected orbits rather than a population-weighted model, and the entire mechanism depends on the adopted slow-bar parameters, which the authors themselves note are not universally accepted. The capture process that would put inner-disc stars onto Trojan orbits is also not demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Figs 5 and 6] The claimed agreement with the observed Hercules group is established only by visually matching a small number of manually chosen quasi-periodic orbits that are selected precisely because they reach the SNd. Figure 5 shows four orbits and Figure 6 shows three perturbations per energy, with no weighting by the phase-space volume, stellar distribution function, or integration-time coverage of the initial-condition space. The paper states that Hercules contains about 23 per cent of SNd stars, but no synthetic population built from the QPO families is compared to the data, so the mechanism's ability to produce an overdensity of that amplitude is not quantified. At minimum, the authors should compute the fraction of the (E_J, y0) initial-condition space that reaches the SNd and discuss how a physically motivated stellar distribution would populate those orbits.
  2. [Sections 2.2 and 4] The central result is conditional on Omega_b = 40 km/s/kpc and a = 5.1 kpc, since these place corotation near 6 kpc and allow the most extended Trojan QPOs to reach R = 8.2 kpc. The paper itself notes in Section 4 that published pattern-speed estimates range from 30 to 60 km/s/kpc and that the short-fast-bar scenario is not observationally excluded. For a faster bar, corotation moves inward and the SNd-reaching Trojan channel disappears, so the proposed origin would not operate. This is not a minor caveat but a load-bearing sensitivity of the main conclusion. I would like to see either a quantitative exploration of Omega_b and bar-length variations (for example, showing at what Omega_b the Trojan QPOs stop reaching the SNd) or an explicit reframing of the conclusion as applying only under the slow-long-bar assumption. The authors' transparency about the limitation is appreciated, but the manuscript currently presents the conclusion in unconditional terms in the abstract and Section 5.
  3. [Section 4, paragraph on capture] The paper's origin claim requires that inner Galactic stars can be captured into the stable Trojan QPOs and then transported to the SNd. However, the capture mechanism is only sketched: the text states that if an unstable orbit approaches a Trojan orbit on the same line in the (L_Z, E) plane it 'may be captured', and that instabilities near L1/L2 'should allow' capture. No example orbit, cross-section, or reference to a quantitative capture study is provided. Since the conclusions explicitly say that Hercules stars are 'captured by the Trojan orbits', this missing step leaves the transport story incomplete. A demonstration for at least one family of inner-disc orbits, or a clear statement that capture is assumed and will be tested in future work, is needed here.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'fast-rotating periodic Trojan orbits around the L4 Lagrange point of the bar minor axis' is confusing, because 'fast' refers to the orbit family rather than the bar rotation; consider rewording, and capitalise 'We' consistently.
  2. [Section 3.3.1 / Fig. 7 caption] The text '(±− 1.2,−1.1)' in the description of subplot h contains a typographical error; it should presumably be '(−1.2,−1.1)' or similar.
  3. [Software / Data Availability] There is a typo in 'Gaia arcive'; also the sentence 'Code used for data analysis and plotting are available on request' should be 'is available'.
  4. [Section 3.2] The text contains 'expecially' instead of 'especially' in the sensitivity discussion.
  5. [Fig. 3] The bottom panel's y-axis label '3/(R )' appears garbled; it should read 'azimuthal force' with the correct units.
  6. [Section 2.2] When introducing the dimensionless numbers Q and P, the paper does not explicitly define the physical meaning of P; a short sentence would improve readability, since P appears only in the equations of motion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model parameters are adopted from independent Milky Way constraints, and the SNd kinematics are forward-integrated orbit outputs rather than fitted quantities.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no circular step. The bar model parameters (a = 5.1 kpc, Omega_b = 40 km/s/kpc, V = 240 km/s, R_c = 2.5 kpc, M_b = 2 x 10^10 M_sun) are fixed in Section 2.2 by independent observations and literature constraints, not by fitting to Hercules kinematics. Orbits are integrated from sampled (E_J, y_0) initial conditions in the analytic Ferrers-plus-logarithmic potential, and the L_Z-V_R distributions in Figures 5 and 6 are computed from the resulting phase-space crossings of the pre-defined solar-neighbourhood cylinder; no parameter is regressed to the Gaia overdensity. The comparison with Hercules is therefore a forward-model consistency check, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The self-citation to Paper I (arXiv:2411.19085) provides independent GALAH/APOGEE chemical evidence used as corroboration for the proposed inner-Galactic origin; the Trojan orbital mechanism itself does not reduce to that citation. The acknowledged sensitivity of the mechanism to the adopted slow bar pattern speed (Sections 2.2 and 4) is a robustness or correctness caveat, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has four physical inputs drawn from Milky Way literature (bar length, mass, pattern speed, rotation curve scales) plus hand-picked initial conditions for the displayed orbits. The transport story additionally assumes capture into Trojan orbits and inherits the chemical origin conclusion of Paper I. No new particles or entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Bar pattern speed Omega_b = 40 km/s/kpc
    Adopted from long-bar literature; determines corotation radius and whether Trojan orbits reach the Sun. Authors note results are sensitive to this value (Sections 2.2 and 4).
  • Bar semi-major scale epsilon (a = 5.1 kpc) = 5 kpc (epsilon^2 = a^2 - c^2)
    Sets bar length and resonance locations; taken from photometric studies of the long bar, not fit to Hercules.
  • Bar mass M_b = 2 x 10^10 M_sun
    Controls non-axisymmetric force strength and Lagrange point locations; chosen to match bar models in the literature.
  • Logarithmic potential scale V and core radius R_c = V = 240 km/s, R_c = 2.5 kpc
    Chosen to approximate a flat Milky Way rotation curve; authors note the model rotation curve is slightly high, which shifts L_z systematically.
  • Selected QPO initial conditions (E_J, y0) = e.g., E_J = -0.6967, y0 = 0.85; E_J = -0.5117, y0 = 0.60
    Initial conditions for plotted QPOs are hand-picked so the orbits pass through the solar neighbourhood and map onto Hercules subgroups; no population weighting or abundance model is attached.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Ferrers bar plus logarithmic disc/halo potential adequately represents the in-plane Milky Way potential for studying orbital families.
    Used throughout Section 2.2; not derived from first principles, and results depend on this idealization.
  • domain assumption The Galactic bar is long and slowly rotating with Omega_b = 40 km/s/kpc and a = 5.1 kpc.
    Adopted in Section 2.2 based on cited literature; the Hercules Trojan scenario depends on this.
  • domain assumption Motion can be restricted to the Galactic plane (z = 0) without changing conclusions.
    Stated in Section 2.2; the authors argue in Section 4 that the 2D approximation is not the reason for kinematic mismatch, citing Moreno et al. 2021.
  • ad hoc to paper Only y-axis-symmetric orbits with initial velocity parallel to the bar minor axis need be considered to characterize the Trojan families.
    Imposed in Section 3.1 to reduce initial condition space; not justified as a general sampling of phase space.
  • ad hoc to paper Stars can be captured into Trojan orbits from inner Galactic orbits (e.g., via L1/L2 or unstable bar orbits).
    Assumed in Section 4 for the transport story; the authors state the capture mechanism is not modeled and requires future self-consistent simulations.
  • domain assumption The chemical origin of Hercules III and IV in the outer bar, as concluded in Paper I by the same authors, is correct.
    Used in Section 4 to connect radial coverage with chemistry; not independently verified in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the origin of the Hercules group: II. the Trojan quasi-periodic identity on the orbital level." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YX6Z7HXP

@misc{pith2026241119097,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the origin of the Hercules group: II. the Trojan quasi-periodic identity on the orbital level},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YX6Z7HXP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19097}
}
abstract

The Hercules kinematic group is a stellar anomaly structure observed in the solar neighbourhood (SNd). In the previous paper, we analysed chemical signatures and related the origin of this stellar population to the outer bar. Next to consider is how this alien population migrate out into the SNd. Often, this kinematic structure is associated with bar resonances. In this paper, We consider the driving mechanism of Hercules on the orbital level. We construct a simple Milky Way-like potential model with a slowly rotating long bar and explore some of the stellar orbit families and their stability. With this model, our numerical solutions of the equations of motion show that quasi-periodic orbits trapped around fast-rotating periodic Trojan orbits around the L4 Lagrange point of the bar minor axis can pass through the SNd. When observed in the SNd, they populate the Hercules structure in the $L_Z$-$V_R$ kinematics space. Moreover, the variation in radial coverage in the galactic plane with the SNd kinematics shows good agreement with chemical signatures found in Paper I. Furthermore, the effective potential shows the topology of a volcano, the rim of which limits most orbits to stay inside or outside. Trojan orbits are a stable orbit family that can transport inner Galactic stars out to the SNd. They can explain the stellar kinematics of Hercules, and provide a straightforward basis for its chemical properties. We support that Trojan orbits associated with the slowly rotating Galactic bar explain the Hercules structure observed in the SNd.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19097 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The distribution of more than 8 million SNd stars in Gaia DR3 in the planar angular momentum-radial velocity plane. The yellow asterisk and the white cross mark the solar and the LSR kinematics. The Hercules group, subdivided into four subgroups, is marked by the dashed cyan contour. We associate eight over-densities as kinematic groups. 2022; Lucchini et al. 2024). Among works supporting the corota￾tion theory, Pér… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The effective gravitational potential of the combined model. Left: contour plot of the combined potential. The five critical points (Lagrange points) are marked by blue points. The position of the sun is marked by the red star. Right: 3D plot of the volcano-like topology of the effective potential. The rim of the volcano functions as a boundary that prevents the communication between the inner and outer region. Most… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rotation curve and azimuthal force induced by the potential model on stationary particles in the frame of corotation. Top: the rotation curves generated by the different components in the model along the y-axis. The observational fitted rotation curve from Eilers et al. (2019) is plotted for comparison; Bottom: the azimuthal force in the direction of the sun (𝜙 = 25◦ ) at different galactic radii in the model. The b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Families of periodic and quasi-periodic orbits and their corresponding Fourier power spectrum. The red asterisk marks the position of the sun and cyan marks the part of the orbit passing through the SNd. Top left: a fast Trojan periodic orbit; Top right: a slow Trojan …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: QPOs in the model mapped to the 𝐿𝑍 -𝑉𝑅 kinematics plane by mock observation. Top row: the morphology of blue QPOs perturbed from the red parent periodic orbits. The sun is marked as a red asterisk and the part of the orbits passing through the SNd are coloured cyan. Th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The variation of mock observations of the QPOs in the kinematics space with Δ𝑦0 = 𝑦0,QPO − 𝑦0,periodic. The kinematics of QPOs in the SNd with three different values for 𝐸𝐽 s are presented on the right. For each 𝐸𝐽 , three QPOs with different perturbations are presente…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The 𝑥-𝑦 surface of section and the morphologies of symmetric periodic orbits at 𝐸𝐽 = −0.6662. In each morphology plot a to h, the periodic orbit is plotted in a warm colour on top of a blue QPO. The sun is marked as a red asterisk and the orbits passed through the SNd …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The 𝑥-𝑦 surface of section and the morphologies of symmetric periodic orbits at 𝐸𝐽 = −0.7193. The ZVC is marked by the two banana shaped blue dashed contours. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The (𝐸𝐽 , 𝑦0 ) initial condition space of the Trojan and related periodic orbits. 𝐸𝐽 is the conserved Jacobi integral and 𝑦0 is where the orbit crosses the y-axis with 𝑦¤ = 0 and 𝑥 >¤ 0. The blue points mark samples of periodic orbits. The vertical dashed orange line m…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Examples of orbits that can potentially contribute to other kinematic structures. For every row, an orbit is generated on the Galactic plane; the orbit’s kinematics in the SNd is marked cyan in the middle; and the x-y surface of section of the orbit is presented on th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the origin of the Hercules group: I. chemical signatures indicating the outer bar origin

    astro-ph.GA 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The low-angular-momentum Hercules III and IV subgroups, after removing high-alpha thick disk stars, show iron-peak and Odd-Z enhancements that suggest an origin near the Milky Way's outer bar.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abdurro'uf et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...35A 259, 35

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    Antoja T., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..60A 563, A60

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322623 2014

  3. [3]

    S., Baba J., B \'e dorf J., Sellentin E., Portegies Zwart S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2849 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.2416A 499, 2416

    Asano T., Fujii M. S., Baba J., B \'e dorf J., Sellentin E., Portegies Zwart S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2849 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.2416A 499, 2416

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2849 2020

  4. [4]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..33A 558, A33

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  6. [6]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A 156, 123

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  7. [7]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..167A 935, 167

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  8. [8]

    Athanassoula E., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/259.2.328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.259..328A 259, 328

    doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.328 1992

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Athanassoula E., Bienayme O., Martinet L., Pfenniger D., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983A&A...127..349A 127, 349

    1983

  2. [10]

    J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15583.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1706A 400, 1706

    Athanassoula E., Romero-G \'o mez M., Bosma A., Masdemont J. J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15583.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1706A 400, 1706

    2009

  3. [11]

    A., P \'e rez-Villegas A., L \'e pine J

    Barros D. A., P \'e rez-Villegas A., L \'e pine J. R. D., Michtchenko T. A., Vieira R. S. S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab59d1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...888...75B 888, 75

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    S., Feltzing S., Gustafsson B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...655L..89B 655, L89

    Bensby T., Oey M. S., Feltzing S., Gustafsson B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...655L..89B 655, L89

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    Bernet M., Ramos P., Antoja T., Famaey B., Monari G., Al Kazwini H., Romero-G \'o mez M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A.116B 667, A116

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Binney J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495..895B 495, 895

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Binney J., Spergel D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...252..308B 252, 308

    1982 doi

  8. [16]

    Binney J., Tremaine S., 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    2008

  9. [17]

    E., Hut P., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/215.1.59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.215...59B 215, 59

    Binney J., Gerhard O. E., Hut P., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/215.1.59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.215...59B 215, 59

    1985 doi

  10. [18]

    G., Sormani M

    Borodina O., Williams T. G., Sormani M. C., Meidt S., Schinnerer E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2068 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.3437B 524, 3437

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    W., Hunt J

    Bovy J., Leung H. W., Hunt J. A. S., Mackereth J. T., Garc \' a-Hern \'a ndez D. A., Roman-Lopes A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2891 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.4740B 490, 4740

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    P., 1973, Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives , 1st edn

    Brent R. P., 1973, Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives , 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    1973

  13. [21]

    arXiv:2409.19858

    Buder S., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.19858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240919858B p. arXiv:2409.19858

    2024 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Chiba R., Sch \"o nrich R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.2412C 505, 2412

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Chiba R., Friske J. K. S., Sch \"o nrich R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.4710C 500, 4710

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Sim \'o C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..147..205C 147, 205

    Cincotta P. M., Sim \'o C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..147..205C 147, 205

    2000 doi

  17. [25]

    Aguerri J

    D'Onghia E., L. Aguerri J. A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6bd6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...890..117D 890, 117

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Dehnen W., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119..800D 119, 800

    2000 doi

  19. [27]

    Drimmel R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A..10D 670, A10

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    J., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113352 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983AJ.....88..642E 88, 642

    Eggen O. J., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113352 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983AJ.....88..642E 88, 642

    1983 doi

  21. [29]

    J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....112.1595E 112, 1595

    Eggen O. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....112.1595E 112, 1595

    1996 doi

  22. [30]

    W., Rix H.-W., Ness M

    Eilers A.-C., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Ness M. K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871..120E 871, 120

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Englmaier P., Gerhard O., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02280.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.304..512E 304, 512

    1999

  24. [32]

    Famaey B., Jorissen A., Luri X., Mayor M., Udry S., Dejonghe H., Turon C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041272 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...430..165F 430, 165

    2005 doi

  25. [33]

    M., 1877, The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1877QJPAM..14....1F 14, 1

    Ferrers N. M., 1877, The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1877QJPAM..14....1F 14, 1

  26. [34]

    Fragkoudi F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1875 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3324F 488, 3324

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    C., 1966, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/133.1.47 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966MNRAS.133...47F 133, 47

    Freeman K. C., 1966, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/133.1.47 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966MNRAS.133...47F 133, 47

    1966 doi

  28. [36]

    GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625L..10G 625, L10

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A..59G 647, A59

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Gerhard O., 2011, @doi [Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi] 10.48550/arXiv.1003.2489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MSAIS..18..185G 18, 185

    2011 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Henon M., Heiles C., 1964, @doi [ ] 10.1086/109234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964AJ.....69...73H 69, 73

    1964 doi

  34. [42]

    Hunt J. A. S., Bovy J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty921 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.3945H 477, 3945

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Hunt J. A. S., Hong J., Bovy J., Kawata D., Grand R. J. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2532 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.3794H 481, 3794

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  37. [45]

    H., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.18000 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240318000H p

    Hunter G. H., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.18000 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240318000H p. arXiv:2403.18000

    2024 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    J., 1991, in Sundelius B., ed., Dynamics of Disc Galaxies

    Kalnajs A. J., 1991, in Sundelius B., ed., Dynamics of Disc Galaxies. p. 323

    1991

  39. [47]

    Khoperskov S., Gerhard O., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141836 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...663A..38K 663, A38

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Kim W.-T., Seo W.-Y., Kim Y., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758...14K 758, 14

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    W., Bovy J., Mackereth J

    Leung H. W., Bovy J., Mackereth J. T., Hunt J. A. S., Lane R. R., Wilson J. C., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3529 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519..948L 519, 948

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...925...71L 925, 71

    Li Z., Shen J., Gerhard O., Clarke J. P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...925...71L 925, 71

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    arXiv:2411.19085

    Li Y., Freeman K., Jerjen H., Buder S., Hayden M., Mondal A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.19085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241119085L p. arXiv:2411.19085

    2024 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Liang X., Yoon S.-J., Zhao J., Li Z., Zhang J., Wu Y., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acf295 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956..146L 956, 146

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Lucchini S., D'Onghia E., Aguerri J. A. L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slae024 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531L..14L 531, L14

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    A., L \'e pine J

    Michtchenko T. A., L \'e pine J. R. D., P \'e rez-Villegas A., Vieira R. S. S., Barros D. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aad804 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863L..37M 863, L37

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Monari G., Kawata D., Hunt J. A. S., Famaey B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466L.113M 466, L113

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    Monari G., Famaey B., Siebert A., Wegg C., Gerhard O., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834820 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A..41M 626, A41

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    G., Schuster W

    Moreno E., Fern \'a ndez-Trincado J. G., Schuster W. J., P \'e rez-Villegas A., Chaves-Velasquez L., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.4687M 506, 4687

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    D., Dermott S

    Murray C. D., Dermott S. F., 1999, Solar System Dynamics , @doi 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    1999 doi

  51. [59]

    Pagel B. E. J., Edmunds M. G., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.000453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ARA&A..19...77P 19, 77

    1981

  52. [60]

    Perek L., 1962, @doi [Advances in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1016/B978-1-4831-9919-1.50008-X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962AdA&A...1..165P 1, 165

    1962 doi

  53. [61]

    E., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 , 9, 21

    P\'erez F., Granger B. E., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 , 9, 21

    2007 doi

  54. [62]

    P \'e rez-Villegas A., Portail M., Wegg C., Gerhard O., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa6c26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...840L...2P 840, L2

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    Portail M., Gerhard O., Wegg C., Ness M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2819 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.1621P 465, 1621

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty865 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478..228Q 478, 228

    Quillen A. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty865 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478..228Q 478, 228

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    J., Combes F., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809644 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...489..115R 489, 115

    Rodriguez-Fernandez N. J., Combes F., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809644 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...489..115R 489, 115

    2008 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Wilkinson A., 1993, @doi [Reports on Progress in Physics] 10.1088/0034-4885/56/2/001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993RPPh...56..173S 56, 173

    Sellwood J. A., Wilkinson A., 1993, @doi [Reports on Progress in Physics] 10.1088/0034-4885/56/2/001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993RPPh...56..173S 56, 173

    1993 doi

  59. [67]

    C., Binney J., Magorrian J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1818S 454, 1818

    Sormani M. C., Binney J., Magorrian J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1818S 454, 1818

    2015 doi

  60. [68]

    C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1857S 512, 1857

    Sormani M. C., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1857S 512, 1857

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    D., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...282L...5T 282, L5

    Tremaine S., Weinberg M. D., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184292 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...282L...5T 282, L5

    1984 doi

  62. [70]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Methods] 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , https://rdcu.be/b08Wh 17, 261

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    Wegg C., Gerhard O., Portail M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv745 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.4050W 450, 4050

    2015 doi

  64. [72]

    J., Sellwood J

    Weiner B. J., Sellwood J. A., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307786 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524..112W 524, 112

    1999 doi

  65. [73]

    H., Fragkoudi F., Ness M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7da0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935...28W 935, 28

    Wheeler A., Abril-Cabezas I., Trick W. H., Fragkoudi F., Ness M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7da0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935...28W 935, 28

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    Zhou Y., Li X., Huang Y., Zhang H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acadd9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946...73Z 946, 73

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    da Costa-Luis C., et al., 2024, tqdm: A fast, Extensible Progress Bar for Python and CLI , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.595120

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    C., 1972, @doi [Vistas in Astronomy] 10.1016/0083-6656(72)90026-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972VA.....14..163D 14, 163

    de Vaucouleurs G., Freeman K. C., 1972, @doi [Vistas in Astronomy] 10.1016/0083-6656(72)90026-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972VA.....14..163D 14, 163

    1972 doi

  69. [77]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.