Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Monolithic piezoelectrically tunable hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coherence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports a fully packaged hybrid integrated laser whose frequency noise sits below a commercial fiber laser while its piezoelectric actuator holds a flat tuning response to 400 kHz, breaking the integrated-laser trade-off between…

desk verdict A credible integrated laser with real packaging and actuation engineering, but the abstract's 'sub-fiber coherence plus 400 kHz actuation' is distributed across two chips, and the paper needs to unify or reframe the claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19264 v1 pith:YD4B27I5 submitted 2024-11-28 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Andrey Voloshin , Anat Siddharth , Simone Bianconi , Alaina Attanasio , Andrea Bancora , Vladimir Shadymov , Sebastien Leni , Rui Ning Wang
show 3 more authors
Johann Riemensberger Sunil A. Bhave Tobias J. Kippenberg
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 42.55.Px42.60.Fc
keywords self-injectionlockingsiliconnitridephotonicspiezoelectricMEMSactuatorfrequencynoisenarrow-linewidthlaserfrequency-modulatedcontinuous-waveLiDARintegratedaluminum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a fully packaged, chip-scale laser that is simultaneously quieter than a commercial fiber laser and fast enough to chirp its frequency in the radio-frequency range, a combination previous integrated designs had not achieved. The laser is built by self-injection locking a distributed-feedback diode to a high-quality silicon nitride spiral microresonator, with a monolithically integrated aluminum nitride piezoelectric actuator providing frequency tuning through mechanical stress. On the lowest-noise build, the integrated linewidth is 1.38 kHz with a 3 Hz intrinsic linewidth and noise below a fiber laser from 10 Hz to 1 MHz; on the faster build, flat actuation extends to 400 kHz and packaged FMCW chirps show 0.08% residual nonlinearity without linearization. Output power reaches 30 mW on the 1.5 GHz version. If correct, this removes a major obstacle to replacing bulky low-noise fiber lasers with integrated photonics in coherent LiDAR, fiber sensing, and optical metrology.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hybrid self-injection-locked laser: a DFB diode butt-coupled to a high-Q silicon nitride spiral microresonator, with a loop reflector at the drop-port raising the back-reflection above 10% and strengthening the linewidth reduction. Frequency agility comes from a monolithically integrated aluminum nitride piezoelectric actuator covering about 20% of the chip, which shifts the cavity resonance through stress-optic and geometric effects; packaging suppresses most chip flapping modes so the response stays flat to 400 kHz, with the third flapping mode around 421 kHz setting the present limit. The paper's noise argument uses an analytical SIL model that reproduces the measured locked noise from the free-running diode's noise.

What would settle it

Take the 250 MHz FSR chip used for the 1.38 kHz integrated linewidth, package it in the butterfly assembly, and measure its S21 actuation response and FMCW chirp nonlinearity under the same conditions used for the 1.5 GHz chip. If that device shows mechanical resonances below 400 kHz or packaged chirp nonlinearity well above 0.08%, the paper's central 'both at once' claim is not established on a single laser.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the long-standing trade-off between ultra-low frequency noise and frequency agility on the Si3N4 platform can be broken by combining self-injection locking to an ultra-low-loss spiral cavity with a monolithically integrated AlN piezo-MEMS actuator. The demonstrated laser achieves a 1.38 kHz integrated linewidth and 3 Hz Lorentzian linewidth on the 250 MHz FSR version, noise below a commercial fiber laser across offset frequencies from 10 Hz to 1 MHz, output power up to 30 mW on the 1.5 GHz version, and a flat actuation bandwidth up to 400 kHz. The same packaged laser performs FMCW chirps with 0.08% nonlinearity and a coherent ranging demo with no chirp linearization, supporting the claim that low noise and agility coexist in one packageable platform.

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on the assumption that the ultra-low noise measured on the 250 MHz FSR chip and the flat 400 kHz actuation measured on the 1.5 GHz FSR chip can be achieved by the same packaged device, because each extreme was demonstrated on a different chip.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A packaged silicon-nitride laser can replace a fiber laser in coherent systems while keeping on-chip frequency modulation, removing external acousto-optic or electro-optic shifters.
  • FMCW LiDAR can run without chirp linearization or pre-distortion, since the packaged laser's residual nonlinearity is 0.08%.
  • Tight laser locking for frequency metrology and fiber sensing becomes possible with an actuation bandwidth roughly ten times wider than bulk-piezo low-noise lasers.
  • The same platform path can target Hz-level integrated linewidths while retaining MHz-scale actuation, since the measured noise is not yet at the thermo-refractive noise floor.
  • Suppressing the third flapping mode by improved acoustic packaging should push flat actuation beyond 400 kHz, potentially toward the bulk acoustic mode regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the two headline extremes were shown on different chips: the 1.38 kHz integrated linewidth belongs to the 250 MHz FSR laser, while the flat 400 kHz actuation and 0.08% nonlinearity belong to the 1.5 GHz FSR laser; a single packaged device exhibiting both would close the demonstration.
  • Packaging changes the actuation from distributed flapping-mode stress to localized piezo stress, cutting tuning efficiency from about 5 MHz/V to 2.4 MHz/V while improving linearity from 0.65% to 0.08%; this suggests a packaging trade-off between tuning strength and linearity that an optimized mount could directly address.
  • A testable extension would be to place the smaller actuator design on the larger 250 MHz spiral and check whether the sub-fiber noise survives high-speed actuation, since the low-noise chip's dense mode spectrum allows locking at nearly any operating point.
  • The loop-reflector-enhanced back-reflection recipe could transfer to other high-Q resonator platforms, potentially lowering integrated linewidth without enlarging the cavity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a hybrid integrated laser built from a DFB diode self-injection locked to a low-loss Si3N4 spiral microresonator, with a monolithically integrated AlN piezoelectric actuator on the same chip. Two cavity variants are studied, with 250 MHz and 1.5 GHz free spectral ranges. The authors report an integrated linewidth of 1.38 kHz for the 250 MHz device and 4.30 kHz for the 1.5 GHz device, a Lorentzian linewidth of 3 Hz, up to 30 mW output power, flat piezo frequency actuation to 400 kHz, FMCW chirp nonlinearity of 0.08% after packaging, and a proof-of-concept FMCW LiDAR acquisition. The central claim is that the platform overcomes the usual trade-off between ultra-low frequency noise and frequency agility.

Significance. If a single packaged laser had simultaneously achieved sub-fiber integrated linewidth and flat 400 kHz frequency actuation, this would be a notable advance for integrated photonics and coherent sensing. The underlying measurements appear internally consistent: the frequency noise spectra are detailed down to 10 Hz offset, the self-injection locking noise model reproduces the measured spectra in Fig. 2(c), the packaged actuation response in Fig. 3(d) is convincing for the 1.5 GHz chip, and the FMCW LiDAR demo is a useful application-level validation. The paper also gives credit to concrete engineering achievements: a compact butterfly-package-compatible die, a large-area AlN piezoactuator covering about 20% of the chip, and a packaging process that suppresses most mechanical modes. However, the significance is currently conditional because the two headline properties are not demonstrated on the same device, and the paper's own comparison metric does not support the claim that the 1.5 GHz device has lower noise than a fiber laser. The value of the individual measurements is clear; the central composite claim needs additional evidence or a substantial reframing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Fig. 2(a); Fig. 3(d); Fig. 4(c)] The headline claim that a single laser simultaneously achieves sub-fiber frequency noise and a flat 400 kHz actuation bandwidth is not supported by the data. The sub-fiber noise result comes from the 250 MHz FSR device (D134_03_F2_C3.1_3), whose integrated linewidth is 1.38 kHz and whose noise lies below the fiber beta-linewidth of 2.17 kHz in Fig. 2(a); however, the packaged 250 MHz chip shows mechanical resonances in its S21 response (Fig. 3(d)) and has an FMCW nonlinearity of 1.65% (Fig. 4(c)). The flat 400 kHz actuation and 0.08% FMCW nonlinearity are demonstrated on the 1.5 GHz FSR device (D134_03_F4_C1.3_4), whose integrated linewidth is 4.30 kHz. The abstract's pairing of a 4.3 kHz integrated linewidth with 400 kHz actuation therefore conjoins one device's noise performance with another device's actuation performance. To support the central claim, the authors must either measure both metrics on a single packaged device or explicitly revise the abstract and conclusion to claim that the platform improves the trade-off, with the two extremes shown in separate variants.
  2. [Abstract; Fig. 2(a)] The paper conflates two linewidth metrics when comparing with fiber lasers. The abstract states that the laser achieves an integrated linewidth of 4.3 kHz and 'phase noise performance that is on par with or lower than commercial fiber lasers,' but the fiber comparison in Fig. 2(a) uses an integrated (beta) linewidth of 2.17 kHz. The 1.5 GHz device's 4.30 kHz integrated linewidth is therefore not lower than the fiber reference under the paper's own metric. The 3 Hz Lorentzian linewidth is a different quantity and cannot be substituted for the beta-linewidth comparison without explicitly justifying why that metric is the relevant one. This metric switching is load-bearing because it underpins the 'sub-fiber laser coherence' claim for the device that also has the 400 kHz actuation.
  3. [Supplementary Section 2, Eq. (S1)] The analytical SIL noise model is used in Fig. 2(c) to argue that the measured noise is limited by SIL dynamics rather than thermo-refractive noise. However, the parameters in Eq. (S1) are assumed rather than independently measured: rho = 0.05, Qr = 10^7, and Qlaser = 10^4. In particular, Qr is not tied to the quoted intrinsic loss rate kappa0/2pi = 30 +/- 10 MHz, which corresponds to Q around 6 x 10^6. Unless these parameters are obtained from independent characterization, or the model is explicitly presented as an illustrative fit, the agreement in Fig. 2(c) does not by itself establish the physical origin of the noise. This point does not invalidate the measured linewidths, but it weakens the mechanistic conclusion drawn from the comparison.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 3(d)] The sentence 'the S21 response of the SIL 250 GHz chip' should read '250 MHz chip'; the same inconsistency appears in the Fig. 3(d) legend, where 'PIC 250 MHz inside a laser' is used.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] There are typographical errors: 'making complaint with' in the abstract should be 'making the design compliant with', and 'complient with strong requirement' in the Introduction should be 'compliant with strong requirements'.
  3. [Supplementary Section 2, Eq. (S1)] The symbol S_phi denotes phase noise in the equation, but the text describes it as frequency noise; please define the units and the relationship between S_phi and the frequency noise spectra shown in Fig. 2.
  4. [Methods C] The sentence 'The FN at low frequency offsets (below 1 kHz) is higher than measured in this work' is ambiguous; clarify whether this refers to the in-house ULE-cavity reference laser or to the device under test.
  5. [Fig. 1(c) and Fig. 2(a)] The device identifiers are given in captions but not in the main text where the headline numbers are quoted; stating the chip ID alongside the 1.38 kHz and 4.30 kHz integrated linewidths in Section II would make the two-device structure of the data clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline results are direct measurements, and the cited model and prior-work comparisons are not used to derive the measured linewidths or actuation bandwidths.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—integrated linewidth of 1.38 kHz (250 MHz chip) and 4.30 kHz (1.5 GHz chip), 3 Hz Lorentzian linewidth, flat 400 kHz actuation, and 0.08% FMCW nonlinearity—are reported as direct measurements with independent characterization setups (OEWaves OE4000, heterodyne detection, S21 response, FMCW beatnote). The analytical SIL model in Supplementary Section 2 uses assumed parameters (ρ=0.05, Qr=10^7, Qlaser=10^4) and the measured free-running DFB noise, but it is used only to show consistency with the measured locked-laser noise and is not the source of the headline values; the linewidth numbers are read from the measured spectra, not produced by the model. The numerous self-citations (e.g., refs. [25], [28], [50]) support fabrication details and prior context rather than carrying the current derivation; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported to force the conclusion. A related but non-circular concern: the sub-fiber coherence (1.38 kHz) and the flat 400 kHz actuation are demonstrated on different FSR chips (250 MHz and 1.5 GHz), so the abstract's combined claim is stronger than any single measured device, but this is a data-support/correctness issue, not a reduction of a prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central measured claims rest on standard optics and elasticity assumptions. The SIL noise model uses three assumed parameters (rho, Qr, Qlaser) that are not independently measured, and the stress-optic linearity and analyzer floor are unvalidated background premises. These do not constitute new entities, but they are inputs the agreement in Fig. 2c depends on.

free parameters (3)
  • SIL feedback amplitude ratio rho = 0.05
    Used in the analytical SIL noise model (Supp. Eq. 1) to reproduce the measured locked noise; no direct measurement of the round-trip feedback amplitude is reported.
  • Resonator Q factor Qr = 1e7
    Assumed in the SIL noise model based on the stated intrinsic loss rate kappa0/2pi = 30 MHz, consistent but not directly tied to a measurement for the specific 250 MHz chip used.
  • Laser diode cavity Q factor Qlaser = 1e4
    A typical DFB value assumed in the model; no measurement is provided.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Euler-Bernoulli beam theory for flapping mode frequencies of the chip.
    Used in Supp. Sec. 6 to estimate mode frequencies f1, f2, f3 and the length extension mode; standard elasticity applied to the PIC as a free-free beam.
  • domain assumption Stress-optic response of the Si3N4/SiO2 waveguide is linear in applied piezo stress.
    The frequency actuation is attributed to stress-induced index change, but no independent calibration of the stress-optic coefficient for this specific 200 nm Si3N4 / 3 um SiO2 stack is given in the paper (Section IV).
  • domain assumption The OE4000 frequency noise analyzer floor is below the measured spectra at low offsets.
    The measured FN at low offsets is presented without marking the instrument floor (e.g., 2500 Hz^2/Hz at 10 Hz), and Methods C admits that no single measurement system covers the full ultra-low FN range from 1 Hz to 1-10 GHz.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monolithic piezoelectrically tunable hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coherence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YD4B27I5

@misc{pith2026241119264,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monolithic piezoelectrically tunable hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coherence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YD4B27I5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19264}
}
abstract

Ultra-low noise lasers are essential tools in a wide variety of applications, including data communication, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), quantum computing and sensing, and optical metrology. Recent advances in integrated photonics, specifically the development of ultra-low loss silicon nitride (Si$_3$N$_4$) platform, have allowed attaining performance that exceeds conventional legacy laser systems, including the phase noise of fiber lasers. This platform can moreover be combined with monolithic integration of piezoelectrical materials, enabling frequency agile low noise lasers. However, this approach has to date not surpassed the trade-off between ultra-low frequency noise and frequency agility. Here we overcome this challenge and demonstrate a fully integrated laser based on the Si$_3$N$_4$ platform with frequency noise lower than that of a fiber laser, while maintaining the capability for high-speed modulation of the laser frequency. The laser achieves an output power of 30 mW with an integrated linewidth of 4.3 kHz and an intrinsic linewidth of 3 Hz, demonstrating phase noise performance that is on par with or lower than commercial fiber lasers. Frequency agility is accomplished via a monolithically integrated piezoelectric aluminum nitride (AlN) micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) actuator, which enables a flat frequency actuation bandwidth extending up to 400 kHz. This combination of ultra-low noise and frequency agility is a useful feature enabling tight laser locking for frequency metrology, fiber sensing, and coherent sensing applications. Our results demonstrate the ability of 'next generation' integrated photonic circuits (beyond silicon) to exceed the performance of legacy laser systems in terms of coherence and frequency actuation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19264 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hybrid integrated laser based on low-loss Si3N4 photonic chip monolithically integrated with AlN piezoelectrical actuators. (a) The laser concept is based on self-injection locking a distributed feedback laser (DFB) to a Si3N4 photonic integrated circuit based microresonator. A photonic chip has a bus waveguide, a dual spiral cavity, piezo-actuators, a drop-port with a loop mirror and an output taper. The output com… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the frequency noise of different laser systems. (a) Light blue and dark lines correspond to FSR 250 MHz (based on D134_03_F2_C3.1_3 PIC) and FSR 1.5 GHz (based on D134_03_F4_C1.3_4 PIC) SIL lasers with integrated linewidths (τ0 = 0.1 s) of 1.38 kHz and 4.30 kHz correspondingly. The Lorentzian linewidth is at 3 Hz for both lasers. The noise of the 250 MHz laser is lower than a fiber laser at all frequen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Characterization of the monolithically integrated AlN piezoactuator. (a) Experimental setup to measure the optomechanical S21 response of the bare MEMS-photonic chips with two lensed fibers. (b) S21 response with the flapping modes f2 = 220 kHz, f3 = 421 kHz and the length extension mode fL = 865 kHz. (c) Experimental setup to measure the optomechanical S21 response of the packaged MEMS-photonic chip inside a butter… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) operation of the hybrid integrated laser. (a, b, c) Demonstration of frequency modulated operation with sawtooth signals (sweep rate 10 kHz). (a) shows a chirped laser frequency in a case of an unpackaged laser which is charac…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Kerr nonlinearity, self-injection locking and correlation in a microresonator

    physics.optics 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two self-injection-locked, counter-propagating lasers in a microresonator produce non-degenerate four-wave-mixing sidebands, and the pump lasers become correlated when the sidebands are generated.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kikuchi, Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber communi- cations, J

    K. Kikuchi, Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber communi- cations, J. Lightwave Technol. 34, 157 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Armstrong, Ofdm for optical communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology 27, 189 (2009)

    J. Armstrong, Ofdm for optical communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology 27, 189 (2009). 9

    2009

  3. [3]

    R. I. MacDonald, Frequency domain optical reflectometer, Appl. Opt. 20, 1840 (1981)

    1981

  4. [4]

    Ip and J

    E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, Feedforward carrier recovery for coherent optical communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology 25, 2675 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Bostick, A carbon dioxide laser radar system, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 3, 232 (1967)

    H. Bostick, A carbon dioxide laser radar system, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 3, 232 (1967)

    1967

  8. [8]

    Rogers, Distributed optical-fibre sensing, Measurement Sci- ence and Technology 10, R75 (1999)

    A. Rogers, Distributed optical-fibre sensing, Measurement Sci- ence and Technology 10, R75 (1999)

    1999

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Dell’Olio, T

    F. Dell’Olio, T. Natale, Y .-C. Wang, and Y .-J. Hung, Miniatur- ization of interferometric optical gyroscopes: A review, IEEE Sensors Journal PP, 1 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Nagata, M. S. B. A. Sharifuddin, F. Ito, A. Naka- mura, and Y . Koshikiya, Long-range frequency-modulated continuous-wave lidar employing wavelength-swept optical frequency comb, Optics Communications 545, 129702 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Martin, D

    A. Martin, D. Dodane, L. Leviandier, D. Dolfi, A. Naughton, P. O’Brien, T. Spuessens, R. Baets, G. Lepage, P. Verheyen, P. D. Heyn, P. Absil, P. Feneyrou, and J. Bourderionnet, Pho- tonic integrated circuit-based fmcw coherent lidar, J. Lightwave Technol. 36, 4640 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Rogers, A

    C. Rogers, A. Y . Piggott, D. J. Thomson, R. F. Wiser, I. E. Opris, S. A. Fortune, A. J. Compston, A. Gondarenko, F. Meng, X. Chen, et al., A universal 3d imaging sensor on a silicon pho- tonics platform, Nature 590, 256 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    M. H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, V . Brasch, M. Zervas, M. Geisel- mann, J. D. Jost, and T. J. Kippenberg, Photonic damascene process for integrated high-q microresonator based nonlinear photonics, Optica 3, 20 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    J. Liu, G. Huang, R. N. Wang, J. He, A. S. Raja, T. Liu, N. J. Engelsen, and T. J. Kippenberg, High-yield, wafer-scale fab- rication of ultralow-loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits, Nature communications 12, 2236 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, D. John, D. Dai, M.-C. Tien, J. S. Barton, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, D. J. Blumenthal, and J. E. Bowers, Ultra-low-loss high-aspect-ratio si3n4 waveg- uides, Opt. Express 19, 3163 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Siddharth, T

    A. Siddharth, T. Wunderer, G. Lihachev, A. S. V oloshin, C. Haller, R. N. Wang, M. Teepe, Z. Yang, J. Liu, J. Riemens- berger, N. Grandjean, N. Johnson, and T. J. Kippenberg, Near ultraviolet photonic integrated lasers based on silicon nitride, APL Photonics 7, 046108 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    L. V . Winkler, K. Gerritsma, A. van Rees, P. P. Schrin- ner, M. Hoekman, R. Dekker, A. R. d. Nascimento Jr, P. J. van der Slot, C. Nölleke, and K.-J. Boller, Widely-tunable and narrow-linewidth hybrid-integrated diode laser at 637 nm, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05325 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Isichenko, N

    A. Isichenko, N. Chauhan, K. Liu, M. W. Harrington, and D. J. Blumenthal, Chip-scale, sub-hz fundamental sub-khz in- tegral linewidth 780 nm laser through self-injection-locking a fabry-p\’erot laser to an ultra-high q integrated resonator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04947 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    B. Li, Z. Yuan, W. Jin, L. Wu, J. Guo, Q.-X. Ji, A. Fe- shali, M. Paniccia, J. E. Bowers, and K. J. Vahala, High- coherence hybrid-integrated 780  nm source by self-injection-locked second-harmonic generation in a high- q silicon-nitride resonator, Optica 10, 1241 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Prokoshin, M

    A. Prokoshin, M. Gehl, S. Madaras, W. W. Chow, and Y . Wan, Ultra-narrow-linewidth hybrid-integrated self-injection locked laser at 780 nm, Optica 11, 1024 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    C. A. A. Franken, A. van Rees, L. V . Winkler, Y . Fan, D. Geskus, R. Dekker, D. H. Geuzebroek, C. Fallnich, P. J. M. van der Slot, and K.-J. Boller, Hybrid-integrated diode laser in the visible spectral range, Opt. Lett. 46, 4904 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Frentrop, N

    R. Frentrop, N. A. Schilder, I. Hegeman, A. S. Everhardt, E. J. Klein, D. H. Geuzebroek, L. V . Winkler, J. Ensher, R. G. Hei- deman, and C. Kelly, 800 nm narrow linewidth tunable hybrid laser based on a dual micro-ring external cavity, in Novel In- Plane Semiconductor Lasers ...

    2023

  15. [23]

    J. Guo, C. A. McLemore, C. Xiang, D. Lee, L. Wu, W. Jin, M. Kelleher, N. Jin, D. Mason, L. Chang, et al., Chip-based laser with 1-hertz integrated linewidth, Science advances 8, eabp9006 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    B. Li, W. Jin, L. Wu, L. Chang, H. Wang, B. Shen, Z. Yuan, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia, K. J. Vahala, and J. E. Bowers, Reach- ing fiber-laser coherence in integrated photonics, Opt. Lett. 46, 5201 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Siddharth, A

    A. Siddharth, A. Attanasio, S. Bianconi, G. Lihachev, J. Zhang, Z. Qiu, A. Bancora, S. Kenning, R. N. Wang, A. S. V oloshin, S. A. Bhave, J. Riemensberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Piezoelec- trically tunable, narrow linewidth photonic integrated extended- dbr lasers, Optica 11, ...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Snigirev, A

    V . Snigirev, A. Riedhauser, G. Lihachev, M. Churaev, J. Riemensberger, R. N. Wang, A. Siddharth, G. Huang, C. Möhl, Y . Popoff,et al., Ultrafast tunable lasers using lithium niobate integrated photonics, Nature 615, 411 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    M. Li, L. Chang, L. Wu, J. Staffa, J. Ling, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, Y . He, R. Lopez-Rios, T. J. Morin, et al. , Integrated pockels laser, Nature communications 13, 5344 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Lihachev, J

    G. Lihachev, J. Riemensberger, W. Weng, J. Liu, H. Tian, A. Siddharth, V . Snigirev, V . Shadymov, A. V oloshin, R. N. Wang, et al. , Low-noise frequency-agile photonic integrated lasers for coherent ranging, Nature communications 13, 3522 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    C. Wang, Z. Li, J. Riemensberger, G. Lihachev, M. Churaev, W. Kao, X. Ji, J. Zhang, T. Blesin, A. Davydova,et al., Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing, Nature , 1 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Z. Li, R. N. Wang, G. Lihachev, J. Zhang, Z. Tan, M. Churaev, N. Kuznetsov, A. Siddharth, M. J. Bereyhi, J. Riemensberger, et al., High density lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits, Nature Communications 14, 4856 (2023)

    2023

  23. [33]

    Shams-Ansari, D

    A. Shams-Ansari, D. Renaud, R. Cheng, L. Shao, L. He, D. Zhu, M. Yu, H. R. Grant, L. Johansson, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇcar, Electrically pumped laser transmitter integrated on thin-film lithium niobate, Optica 9, 408 (2022)

    2022

  24. [35]

    Zhang, Z

    J. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Riemensberger, G. Lihachev, G. Huang, and T. J. Kippenberg, Fundamental charge noise in electro-optic photonic integrated circuits (2023), arXiv:2308.15404. 10

    2023 arXiv

  25. [36]

    Liang, V

    W. Liang, V . S. Ilchenko, D. Eliyahu, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, Ultralow noise miniature ex- ternal cavity semiconductor laser, Nature Communications 6, 7371 (2015)

    2015

  26. [37]

    Choudhary and K

    V . Choudhary and K. Iniewski,Mems: fundamental technology and applications (CRC Press, 2017)

    2017

  27. [38]

    A. Gao, K. Liu, J. Liang, and T. Wu, Aln mems filters with extremely high bandwidth widening capability, Microsystems & Nanoengineering 6, 74 (2020)

    2020

  28. [39]

    Y . Zou, C. Gao, J. Zhou, Y . Liu, Q. Xu, Y . Qu, W. Liu, J. B. W. Soon, Y . Cai, and C. Sun, Aluminum scandium nitride thin- film bulk acoustic resonators for 5g wideband applications, Mi- crosystems & Nanoengineering 8, 124 (2022)

    2022

  29. [40]

    R. G. Polcawich, J. S. Pulskamp, S. Bedair, G. Smith, R. Kaul, C. Kroninger, E. Wetzel, H. Chandrahalim, and S. A. Bhave, In- tegrated piezomems actuators and sensors, in SENSORS, 2010 IEEE (2010) pp. 2193–2196

    2010

  30. [41]

    Kroninger, J

    C. Kroninger, J. Pulskamp, J. Bronson, R. Polcawich, and E. Wetzel, Bio-mimetic millimeter-scale flapping wings for mi- cro air vehicles , ARL-TR-4729 (Army Research Laboratory, 2009)

    2009

  31. [42]

    Jimbo, T

    T. Jimbo, T. Ozaki, Y . Amano, and K. Fujimoto, Flight control of flapping-wing robot with three paired direct-driven piezo- electric actuators, IFAC-PapersOnLine53, 9391 (2020)

    2020

  32. [43]

    Z. Han, S. Colburn, A. Majumdar, and K. F. Böhringer, Millimeter-scale focal length tuning with mems-integrated meta-optics employing high-throughput fabrication, Scientific Reports 12, 5385 (2022)

    2022

  33. [44]

    K. Seo, J. Park, H. Kim, D. Kim, S. Ur, and S. Yi, Microma- chined piezoelectric microspeakers fabricated with high quality aln thin film, Integrated Ferroelectrics 95, 74 (2010)

    2010

  34. [45]

    Wang, A.-C

    K. Wang, A.-C. Wong, and C.-C. Nguyen, Vhf free-free beam high-q micromechanical resonators, Journal of Micro- electromechanical Systems 9, 347 (2000)

    2000

  35. [46]

    Demirci and C.-C

    M. Demirci and C.-C. Nguyen, Higher-mode free-free beam micromechanical resonators, in IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jointly with the 17th European Frequency and Time Forum, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 (2003) pp. 810–818

    2003

  36. [47]

    J. R. Clark, A. R. Brown, G. He, and W.-T. Hsu, Temperature compensated overtone resonators, in 2013 Transducers & Eu- rosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid- State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXVII) (IEEE, 2013) pp. 794–797

    2013

  37. [48]

    Clark and G

    J. Clark and G. Mostyn, Microchip Oscillators and Clocks Using Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Technology , Tech. Rep. DS00002344A-page 1 (Microchip Technology Inc., 2017)

    2017

  38. [49]

    Jin, Q.-F

    W. Jin, Q.-F. Yang, L. Chang, B. Shen, H. Wang, M. A. Leal, L. Wu, M. Gao, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia, et al., Hertz-linewidth semiconductor lasers using cmos-ready ultra-high-q microres- onators, Nature Photonics 15, 346 (2021)

    2021

  39. [50]

    N. M. Kondratiev, V . E. Lobanov, A. V . Cherenkov, A. S. V oloshin, N. G. Pavlov, S. Koptyaev, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Self-injection locking of a laser diode to a high-Q WGM mi- croresonator, Opt. Express 25, 28167 (2017)

    2017

  40. [51]

    A. E. Ulanov, T. Wildi, N. G. Pavlov, J. D. Jost, M. Karpov, and T. Herr, Synthetic reflection self-injection-locked microcombs, Nature Photonics 18, 294 (2024)

    2024

  41. [53]

    J. Liu, H. Tian, E. Lucas, A. S. Raja, G. Lihachev, R. N. Wang, J. He, T. Liu, M. H. Anderson, W. Weng, et al. , Monolithic piezoelectric control of soliton microcombs, Nature 583, 385 (2020)

    2020

  42. [54]

    Inc., Specifications of oe4040-xln, Specifications (2023), https://morephotonics.com/wp-content/ uploads/2023/02/OE4040.pdf

    O. Inc., Specifications of oe4040-xln, Specifications (2023), https://morephotonics.com/wp-content/ uploads/2023/02/OE4040.pdf

    2023

  43. [55]

    S. M. Ousaid, G. Bourcier, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, T. Bunel, M. Conforti, A. Mussot, V . Crozatier, and S. Balac, Low phase noise self-injection-locked diode laser with a high-q fiber resonator: model and experiment, Opt. Lett. 49, 1933 (2024)

    2024

  44. [56]

    H. Tian, J. Liu, B. Dong, J. C. Skehan, M. Zervas, T. J. Kippen- berg, and S. A. Bhave, Hybrid integrated photonics using bulk acoustic resonators, Nature communications 11, 3073 (2020). Supplementary Information for: Monolithic piezoelectrically tunable hybrid integrated lase...

    2020

  45. [57]

    Benchmark of fully integrated photonic chip-based ultra-low noise lasers 2

  46. [58]

    Analytical estimation of the SIL frequency noise 3

  47. [59]

    Pull-back fabrication process of electrodes 4

  48. [60]

    Fabrication of the Si 3N4 -AlN photonic chips 4

  49. [61]

    Photonic chip layout and passive characterization of optical cavities 5

  50. [62]

    Mechanical modes of mm-size piezoMEMS-PIC systems 6

  51. [63]

    Effect of laser linewidth and tuning linearity for homodyne detection 6

  52. [64]

    FMCW LiDAR demo 8 ∗ authors contributed equally; andrey.voloshin@epfl.ch † authors contributed equally ‡ sunil.bhave@epfl.ch § tobias.kippenberg@epfl.ch arXiv:2411.19264v1 [physics.optics] 28 Nov 2024 2

    2024 arXiv

  53. [65]

    Benchmark of fully integrated photonic chip-based ultra-low noise lasers 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 Frequency Actuation Bandwidth (Hz) 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 Laser Intrinsic Linewidth (Hz) 1 Si, Vernier 2 SiN, Vernier, microheate...

  54. [66]

    Ring-resonator based widely-tunable narrow-linewidth Si/InP integrated lasers

    M.A. Tran, et al. "Ring-resonator based widely-tunable narrow-linewidth Si/InP integrated lasers." IEEE 26.2 (2019)

    2019

  55. [67]

    Hybrid integrated InP-Si 3 N 4 diode laser with a 40-Hz intrinsic linewidth

    Y. Fan, et al. "Hybrid integrated InP-Si 3 N 4 diode laser with a 40-Hz intrinsic linewidth." Optics express 28.15 (2020)

    2020

  56. [68]

    Long-term Absolute Frequency Stabilization of a Hybrid-integrated InP-Si 3 N 4 Diode Laser

    A. van Rees, et al. "Long-term Absolute Frequency Stabilization of a Hybrid-integrated InP-Si 3 N 4 Diode Laser." IEEE Phot. Jour. (2023)

    2023

  57. [69]

    Low-noise frequency-agile photonic integrated lasers for coherent ranging

    G. Lihachev, et al. "Low-noise frequency-agile photonic integrated lasers for coherent ranging." Nature communications 13.1 (2022)

    2022

  58. [70]

    Reaching fiber-laser coherence in integrated photonics

    B. Li, et al. "Reaching fiber-laser coherence in integrated photonics." Optics Letters 46.20 (2021)

    2021

  59. [72]

    Piezoelectrically tunable, narrow linewidth photonic integrated extended-DBR lasers

    A. Siddharth, et al. "Piezoelectrically tunable, narrow linewidth photonic integrated extended-DBR lasers." Optica 11.8 (2024)

    2024

  60. [73]

    Integrated pockels laser

    M. Li, et al. "Integrated pockels laser." Nature communications 13.1 (2022)

    2022

  61. [74]

    High density lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits

    Z. Li, et al. "High density lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits." Nature Communications 14.1 (2023)

    2023

  62. [77]

    https://morephotonics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Rio_Planex_Product-Brief_1.24.14.pdf

    2020

  63. [79]

    The intrinsic linewidth is 220 Hz, while the tuneability is enabled by microheaters resulting in a relatively slow tuning of 10 kHz

    features an a dual-ring Vernier laser with an InP gain section based on a silicon waveguide platform. The intrinsic linewidth is 220 Hz, while the tuneability is enabled by microheaters resulting in a relatively slow tuning of 10 kHz. The next work [2] demonstrates a remarkabl...

  64. [80]

    Recently, different approaches have been proposed to quantitatively estimate the noise and linewidth reduction based on SIL to PIC-based high-Q photonic microresonators [17–19]

    Analytical estimation of the SIL frequency noise Finally, we compare the measured FN of SIL lasers with analytical estimations. Recently, different approaches have been proposed to quantitatively estimate the noise and linewidth reduction based on SIL to PIC-based high-Q photo...

  65. [81]

    Pull-back

    Pull-back fabrication process of electrodes The ”Pull-back process” for fabrication of electrodes is developed for this work and the photonic packaging of hybrid integrated lasers based on PICs with piezo-actuators. It minimizes the capacitance of bond-pads and for the ease of...

  66. [82]

    Si 3N4 thin films of 200 nm are procured externally and waveguide cores are etched using a fluoride-based dry reactive ion etching chemistry

    Fabrication of the Si 3N4 -AlN photonic chips The Si3N4 photonic chips are fabricated with a custom subtractive waveguide manufacturing process based on 248 nm DUV stepper lithography with fluoride-based dry reactive ion etching chemistry. Si 3N4 thin films of 200 nm are procu...

  67. [83]

    The bus waveguide is coupled to an optical waveguide cavity formed by two connected spiral structures with κ0/2π = 30± 10 MHz

    Photonic chip layout and passive characterization of optical cavities The bus waveguide has a microheater to control the optical phase delay, which is an important parameter of optical SIL [17]. The bus waveguide is coupled to an optical waveguide cavity formed by two connecte...

  68. [84]

    Mechanical modes of mm-size piezoMEMS-PIC systems We simulated the mechanical modes of a PIC (220 µm thick Si 3N4 ) with 1.5 GHz spiral photonic cavity and a piezoactuator covering more than 20% of the surface. In this case the actuation of the PIC is fully dominated by non-lo...

  69. [85]

    The simulation used a chirp signal with a linearly changing instantaneous frequency ranging from 0 to 1 GHz over a duration of 50 µs

    Effect of laser linewidth and tuning linearity for homodyne detection To estimate the effect of laser linewidth and nonlinearity on a frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) signal for homodyne detection, we simulated the spectrum of the homodyne beatnote of an FMCW signal ...

  70. [86]

    FMCW LiDAR demo To showcase the tuning bandwidth and chirp linearity of the photonic integrated circuit-based lasers, we conducted an optical coherent ranging demo in a lab environment using the FMCW LiDAR scheme. Here, the target range is inferred from the beat frequency of a...

  71. [87]

    M. A. Tran, D. Huang, and J. E. Bowers, APL Photonics 4, 111101 (2019)

    2019

  72. [88]

    Y. Fan, A. van Rees, P. J. Van der Slot, J. Mak, R. M. Oldenbeuving, M. Hoekman, D. Geskus, C. G. Roeloffzen, and K.-J. Boller, Optics express 28, 21713 (2020)

    2020

  73. [89]

    van Rees, L

    A. van Rees, L. V. Winkler, P. Brochard, D. Geskus, P. J. M. van der Slot, C. N¨ olleke, and K.-J. Boller, IEEE Photonics Journal 15, 1 (2023). 10

    2023

  74. [90]

    Lihachev, J

    G. Lihachev, J. Riemensberger, W. Weng, J. Liu, H. Tian, A. Siddharth, V. Snigirev, V. Shadymov, A. Voloshin, R. N. Wang, J. He, S. A. Bhave, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature Communications 13, 3522 (2022)

    2022

  75. [91]

    B. Li, W. Jin, L. Wu, L. Chang, H. Wang, B. Shen, Z. Yuan, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia, K. J. Vahala, and J. E. Bowers, Opt. Lett. 46, 5201 (2021)

    2021

  76. [92]

    Lihachev, A

    G. Lihachev, A. Bancora, V. Snigirev, H. Tian, J. Riemensberger, V. Shadymov, A. Siddharth, A. Attanasio, R. N. Wang, D. Visani, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00425 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  77. [93]

    Siddharth, A

    A. Siddharth, A. Attanasio, S. Bianconi, G. Lihachev, J. Zhang, Z. Qiu, A. Bancora, S. Kenning, R. N. Wang, A. S. Voloshin, S. A. Bhave, J. Riemensberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optica 11, 1062 (2024)

    2024

  78. [94]

    M. Li, L. Chang, L. Wu, J. Staffa, J. Ling, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, Y. He, R. Lopez-Rios, T. J. Morin, et al. , Nature communications 13, 5344 (2022)

    2022

  79. [95]

    Z. Li, R. N. Wang, G. Lihachev, J. Zhang, Z. Tan, M. Churaev, N. Kuznetsov, A. Siddharth, M. J. Bereyhi, J. Riemens- berger, et al. , Nature Communications 14, 4856 (2023)

    2023

  80. [96]

    S. Xue, M. Li, R. Lopez-rios, J. Ling, Z. Gao, Q. Hu, T. Qiu, J. Staffa, L. Chang, H. Wang, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07482 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  81. [97]

    Siddharth, S

    A. Siddharth, S. Bianconi, R. N. Wang, Z. Qiu, A. S. Voloshin, M. J. Bereyhi, J. Riemensberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01743 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  82. [98]

    C. A. Franken, R. Cheng, K. Powell, G. Kyriazidis, V. Rosborough, J. Musolf, M. Shah, D. R. Barton III, G. Hills, L. Johansson, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00269 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  83. [99]

    RIO - Redfern Integrated Optics, Rio planex product brief (2014), accessed: 2024-09-09

    2014

  84. [100]

    This work (2024), this work presents original research conducted by the authors

    2024

  85. [101]

    Inc., Specifications (2023), https://morephotonics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OE4040.pdf

    O. Inc., Specifications (2023), https://morephotonics.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OE4040.pdf

    2023

  86. [102]

    Liang, V

    W. Liang, V. S. Ilchenko, D. Eliyahu, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, Nature Communications 6, 7371 (2015)

    2015

  87. [103]

    A. S. Voloshin, N. M. Kondratiev, G. V. Lihachev, J. Liu, V. E. Lobanov, N. Y. Dmitriev, W. Weng, T. J. Kippenberg, and I. A. Bilenko, Nature communications 12, 235 (2021)

    2021

  88. [104]

    A. E. Ulanov, T. Wildi, U. Bhatnagar, and T. Herr, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08679 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  89. [105]

    Jin, Q.-F

    W. Jin, Q.-F. Yang, L. Chang, B. Shen, H. Wang, M. A. Leal, L. Wu, M. Gao, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia, et al. , Nature Photonics 15, 346 (2021)

    2021

  90. [106]

    S. M. Ousaid, G. Bourcier, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, T. Bunel, M. Conforti, A. Mussot, V. Crozatier, and S. Balac, Opt. Lett. 49, 1933 (2024)

    2024

  91. [107]

    Adler, Proceedings of the IRE 34, 351 (1946)

    R. Adler, Proceedings of the IRE 34, 351 (1946)

    1946

  92. [108]

    Chang, IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques 51, 1994 (2003)

    H.-C. Chang, IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques 51, 1994 (2003)

    2003

  93. [109]

    Torres-Company, Z

    V. Torres-Company, Z. Ye, P. Zhao, M. Karlsson, and P. A. Andrekson, in 2022 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC) (IEEE, 2022) pp. 1–3

    2022

  94. [110]

    M. W. Puckett, K. Liu, N. Chauhan, Q. Zhao, N. Jin, H. Cheng, J. Wu, R. O. Behunin, P. T. Rakich, K. D. Nelson, et al., Nature communications 12, 934 (2021)

    2021

  95. [111]

    H. Tian, J. Liu, B. Dong, J. C. Skehan, M. Zervas, T. J. Kippenberg, and S. A. Bhave, Nature Communications 11, 3073 (2020)

    2020

  96. [112]

    J. Liu, V. Brasch, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, A. N. Kamel, H. Guo, M. Geiselmann, and T. J. Kippenberg, Opt. Lett. 41, 3134 (2016)

    2016

  97. [113]

    Riemensberger, N

    J. Riemensberger, N. Kuznetsov, J. Liu, J. He, R. N. Wang, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature 612, 56 (2022)

    2022

  98. [114]

    M. U. Demirci and C. T.-C. Nguyen, in IEEE International Frequency Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jointly with the 17th European Freqeuncy and Time Forum (2003)

    2003

  99. [115]

    Behroozpour, P

    B. Behroozpour, P. A. Sandborn, M. C. Wu, and B. E. Boser, IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 135 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.