Open and trapping channels in complex resonant media

Arthur Goetschy; Romain Pierrat; Romain Rescanieres

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Open and trapping channels in complex resonant media

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the transmission and dwell-time eigenvalue distributions of resonant disordered media are fully characterized by two mesoscopic parameters—the transport mean free path ℓ(ω) and the energy velocity vE(ω)—plus the…

desk verdict Solid extension of mesoscopic wave transport to all-resonant media; transmission part is clean and parameter-free, dwell-time part rests on an assumed scaling that the numerics do not independently test. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19818 v1 pith:AGV4QVJR submitted 2024-11-29 physics.optics cond-mat.dis-nn

Romain Rescanieres , Romain Pierrat , Arthur Goetschy This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticscond-mat.dis-nn

keywords resonantdisordertransmissioneigenvaluedistributiondwell-timeoperatorwavefrontshapingenergyvelocityAndersonlocalizationmeanfreepathmultiplescattering

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies how resonant scatterers—particles that ring at a specific frequency—change the statistics of light transmitted through a disordered medium. It claims that the entire eigenvalue distributions of the transmission matrix and of the dwell-time (Wigner-Smith) operator are set by just two frequency-dependent mesoscopic parameters, the transport mean free path ℓ(ω) and the energy velocity vE(ω), together with the sample length L and the number of propagation channels N. If true, wavefront shaping becomes quantitatively predictable: the largest transmission eigenchannel transmits a factor ∝ L/ℓ(ω) more than a plane wave in the diffusive regime, rising to ∝ N $e^{{2L/ξ}}$ in the localized regime, and the longest-lived dwell-time eigenchannels store energy with an extra factor ∝ Q/kℓ(ω) when high-Q resonators replace low-Q ones. The paper supports these claims with coupled-dipole simulations in a two-dimensional waveguide across quasi-ballistic, diffusive, and localized transport regimes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the matrix pair formed by the flux-normalized transmission matrix t(ω) and the dwell-time operator Qd(ω) = Q(ω)+Qi(ω)+Qe(ω), where Q(ω) is the Wigner-Smith operator built from frequency derivatives of t and r, Qi(ω) accounts for interference between incident and reflected fields, and Qe(ω) captures scattering into evanescent waveguide channels. These matrices are computed from coupled dipole equations with a dressed polarizability that enforces flux conservation, so that t†t+r†r = 1. The analytic engine is the injection of the detuning-dependent mean free path ℓ(ω) and the energy velocity vE(ω) into the known non-resonant distribution formulas: the bimodal P(T) of Eq. (15) and the dwell-time distribution of Eq. (31), with the scattering time and mean dwell time set by τs = (π/2)ℓ(ω)/vE(ω) and ⟨τ⟩ = (π/2)L/vE(ω) (Eq. (33)). The energy velocity expression of Eq. (32) is what produces the additional Q/kℓ(ω) enhancement of the longest dwell times.

What would settle it

Measure the largest dwell-time eigenvalue τmax in a two-dimensional waveguide at resonance (δ=0) with fixed length L, width W, and optical thickness kℓ(ω) (compensating any change in scatterer number Ns), and vary the resonator quality factor Q over two orders of magnitude; the paper predicts τmax/τb ≃ (2π/9)(L/ℓ(ω))(1 + Q/2kℓ(ω)), so a slope in Q/(2kℓ(ω)) that is not close to 1 would falsify the energy-velocity scaling and the dwell-time distribution built on it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that resonant disorder does not require a new mesoscopic theory: inserting the frequency-dependent mean free path ℓ(ω) and energy velocity vE(ω) into the standard non-resonant formulas for the transmission and dwell-time eigenvalue distributions reproduces the numerically computed statistics at every detuning, from quasi-ballistic through diffusive to localized transport. Near resonance, ℓ(ω) drops, which makes the transmission eigenvalue distribution switch from monomodal to bimodal and back as the detuning is varied, while the dwell-time distribution broadens by orders of magnitude because vE(ω) slows the diffusive transport of energy. The same two parameters predict the wavefront-shaping enhancements: a transmission gain ∝ L/ℓ(ω) in the diffusive regime, a gain ∝ N $e^{{2L/ξ}}$ in the localized regime, and a dwell-time gain that acquires an additional factor ∝ Q/2kℓ(ω) when high-Q resonators are used, with the localized dwell-time distribution exhibiting a universal 1/τ² tail.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the non-resonant relation between the longest dwell time and the diffusion (Thouless) time, transplanted to resonant media via Eq. (33) with the energy velocity from Eq. (32), remains exact—if the true energy velocity differs from that expression, the predicted Q/kℓ(ω) broadening of dwell times does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the two-parameter characterization is correct, P(T) and P(τ) for any resonant disordered medium can be predicted from ℓ(ω), vE(ω), L, and N without simulating the full microscopic scattering problem.
Wavefront shaping on the largest transmission eigenchannel yields transmission gains ∝ L/ℓ(ω) in the diffusive regime and ∝ N e^{2L/ξ} in the localized regime, where ξ = (π/2)Nℓ(ω).
The longest-lived dwell-time eigenchannel stores energy for a time ∝ L/ℓ(ω) longer than a plane wave, and replacing low-Q with high-Q resonators adds a factor ∝ Q/kℓ(ω) in both diffusive and localized regimes.
Near resonance, the transmission eigenvalue distribution passes from monomodal to bimodal and back as the detuning is varied, marking the quasi-ballistic-to-diffusive-to-localized crossover.
In the localized regime the dwell-time distribution has an unbounded 1/τ² tail, so the largest accessible dwell time grows with the number of disorder realizations probed, ∝ N²Nrℓ(ω)/L.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the two-parameter reduction holds, other mesoscopic observables in resonant media—conductance fluctuations, intensity correlation functions, focusing contrast—should be obtainable by substituting ℓ(ω) and vE(ω) into existing non-resonant random-matrix formulas, a step the paper does not take.
Because the field-intensity profiles of the longest-lived dwell-time eigenstates are nearly independent of Q, experiments that measure only light intensity will miss most of the energy-storage enhancement; probing the material excitation (e.g., via fluorescence or absorption) would test the Q-scaling directly.
The predicted 1/τ² localized tail, if generic in any dimension, suggests wavefront shaping in resonant localized media could serve as a controllable source of very long-lived excitations, potentially relevant for slow-light or memory applications—an extension the paper leaves implicit.
A direct numerical test of Eq. (33) would be to extract τs and ⟨τ⟩ from time-dependent coupled-dipole simulations (e.g., pulse propagation) and compare them with πℓ(ω)/2vE(ω); a disagreement would require a resonant-specific correction to the dwell-time distribution.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The transmission part is a clean, parameter-free confirmation that the known bimodal law holds once you compute the resonant mean free path \ell(\omega). The genuinely new contribution is the dwell-time statistics: near resonance the distribution broadens, and the maximum dwell time gains a Q/(k\ell) enhancement with a concrete prefactor. Both are worth having.

The numerics are substantial — 5760 disorder configurations, up to 2\times10^4 scatterers — and the diffusive curves in Figs. 2 and 4 use no fitted parameters. The coupled-dipole formalism with the waveguide-dressed polarizability is careful, and the paper is honest about what is assumed versus derived. It explicitly calls the bimodal P(T) "unsurprising" once \ell(\omega) is known, and it flags the extrapolated closed-channel profile in Eq. (21) and the scaling factor in the quasi-ballistic P(\tau).

The soft spots are the ones the stress-test names. Equation (33) sets \tau_s and \langle\tau\rangle by "assuming" the \tau_{\rm max}–\tau_{\rm Th} scaling carries over to resonant media. That is the load-bearing step for the dwell-time predictions, and it is asserted, not derived from the microscopic model. Equation (32) likewise adapts the 3D energy-velocity expression to 2D without derivation. And the simulations do not independently vary \ell(\omega) and v_E(\omega): Fig. 4 compares a single diffusive detuning, and Fig. 5 changes N_s at fixed resonance, so both parameters move together in a way fixed by the model. The data are consistent with the two-parameter ansatz, but they do not rule out a shape correction or an extra dependence on Q/k\ell at fixed L/\ell. That makes the "fully characterized" conclusion in the abstract somewhat stronger than the evidence. This is a moderate concern, not a fatal one: if v_E or the \tau_s relation shifts, the enhancement factors change quantitatively, but the qualitative predictions and the parameter-free agreement in the tested regimes stand.

This paper deserves a serious referee. The wavefront-shaping and nanophotonics community will use the predicted L/\ell and Q/k\ell enhancement targets, and the authors should be asked to derive or better test Eq. (33) and to release code or data. I would bring it to the reading group.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the statistics of transmission and dwell-time matrices for light propagating through a 2D waveguide filled with point-like resonant scatterers. Using coupled-dipole simulations for up to 2×10^4 scatterers and 5760 disorder configurations, the authors show that the eigenvalue distributions P(T) and P(τ) evolve with frequency detuning, and they interpret the evolution through the frequency-dependent transport mean free path ℓ(ω) and energy velocity v_E(ω). The central claim is that these two mesoscopic parameters, together with the system length L and channel number N, fully characterize P(T) and P(τ) across quasi-ballistic, diffusive, and localized regimes. The paper derives predictions for wavefront-shaping enhancements of transmission and energy storage, including a factor ∝ Q/kℓ for high-Q resonators.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a useful mesoscopic description of a broad class of resonant disordered media, connecting microscopic scattering parameters to wavefront-shaping performance. The numerical campaign is substantial: 5760 disorder configurations, up to 2×10^4 scatterers, and a numerically exact coupled-dipole treatment with proper waveguide renormalization of the polarizability. The analytic lines used for the diffusive and localized P(T) are parameter-free and agree well with simulations. The paper also correctly identifies that the energy velocity, not just the mean free path, controls dwell-time statistics, which is a physically important point for resonator-based systems. The main weaknesses are that some load-bearing analytic relations are assumed or extrapolated from non-resonant theory rather than derived for resonant media, and the numerical tests do not vary ℓ(ω) and v_E(ω) independently, so the 'fully characterized' claim is not yet decisively established.

major comments (3)

[Sec. III.B, Eq. (33)] Equation (33) sets τ_s=(π/2)ℓ(ω)/v_E(ω) and ⟨τ⟩=(π/2)L/v_E(ω) by 'assuming that the scaling of τmax with τTh must hold for resonant media.' This is an explicit assumption rather than a derivation. The coefficients of Eq. (31), and therefore the predicted P(τ) and the enhancement (34), depend on τ_s and ⟨τ⟩. The numerical tests in Figs. 4 and 5 vary detuning or N_s with other parameters fixed, so ℓ(ω) and v_E(ω) are not varied independently; the simulations cannot discriminate between the two-parameter description and, for example, an additional explicit Q dependence at fixed L/ℓ. Please provide a derivation of Eq. (33) for resonant media, or a numerical experiment in which ℓ and v_E are varied independently (e.g., different Q at matched L/ℓ and ℓ/v_E) to support the central two-parameter claim.
[Sec. III.B, Eq. (32)] The energy-velocity expression (32) is 'adapt[ed]' from Ref. [30] to 2D scattering without a derivation. The factor 1+2/(πQ) and the v_φ/c^2 term control the predicted broadening c/v_E≈Q/2kℓ in Eq. (34). Since the local density of states and the 2D Green's function differ from the 3D case, the adaptation is not self-evident; without a derivation or an independent microscopic check, the quantitative prediction (34) rests on an unverified transport coefficient.
[Sec. III.B, Eq. (36)] Equation (36), the localized-regime tail of P(τ), is obtained by 'extrapolating known results for the Wigner time in non-resonant media' to resonant cases. The supporting argument based on P(Γ)~1/Γ is heuristic, and the agreement shown in Fig. 4 is for a single parameter set. Since the conclusion claims full characterization in the localized regime and the τ_max/⟨τ⟩ enhancement in the conclusion uses Eq. (36), this extrapolation should be either derived or tested over a range of Q and N_s values.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. II.C, Eq. (21)] The closed-channel intensity profile in Eq. (21) is an extrapolation of the results of Ref. [41] to small transmission and is only qualitatively supported; please state this explicitly in the text and in the caption of Fig. 3.
[Sec. III.B, Eq. (30)] The quasi-ballistic prediction (30) matches simulations only 'provided a scaling factor is introduced' for residual scattering; this scaling factor is a free parameter, and the manuscript should state this clearly and report its fitted value rather than presenting the curve as parameter-free.
[Sec. III.B, Eq. (31)] The symbol α is used both for the coefficients in Eq. (31) and for the polarizability in Eq. (5); renaming the coefficients, for example to a, b, g, would remove a source of confusion.
[Sec. III.B, Eq. (34)] The text says Eq. (34) follows by 'neglecting the small impact of the refractive index on phase velocity'; please specify the conditions under which v_φ≈c is a controlled approximation, since v_φ appears explicitly in the intermediate expression for v_E.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central P(T) and P(τ) predictions are parameter-free uses of independently computed ℓ(ω) and vE(ω), validated against numerical simulation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The transmission distributions are obtained by inserting the independently computed mean free path, Eq. (13), into the standard bimodal DMPK result, Eq. (15), and the localized distribution, Eqs. (16)-(17), is taken from independent literature; the comparison with 5760-configuration simulations uses no fitted ℓ(ω). The dwell-time distributions are obtained by applying the non-resonant distribution, Eq. (31) from Ref. [15], with scattering and mean times set by Eq. (33), which in turn uses the energy velocity of Eq. (32) adapted from the external Lagendijk and van Tiggelen review. The shape of Eq. (31), the coefficients α, β, γ, and the predicted maximal dwell-time scale ∝ L²/(ℓ vE) are nontrivial functions of the inserted transport parameters, and the simulations confirm these predictions without adjusting ℓ or vE. The only adjusted element is the explicitly disclosed scaling factor in the quasi-ballistic green curve of Fig. 4, which does not enter the central diffusive or localized predictions. Refs. [15], [35], and [45] share authors with this paper, but they are independently derived published results used as ordinary input, not as an unverified uniqueness argument or as a hidden redefinition of the target quantities. The assumption in Eq. (33) that the τmax–τTh scaling carries over to resonant media is a fragile extrapolation and a correctness risk, but it is an explicit premise rather than a circular reduction: it does not equate a prediction to a fit or define one quantity in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claims are grounded in the coupled-dipole model plus prior statistical transport results; no invented entities are introduced. One explicit assumption (Eq. 33) and several extrapolations carry the dwell-time predictions, while the transmission statistics rely on standard DMPK formulas.

free parameters (1)

Quasi-ballistic P(τ) scaling factor = not specified
In the discussion of Fig. 4, the green theoretical curve for the quasi-ballistic regime is brought into agreement 'provided a scaling factor is introduced to account for the residual scattering at short dwell-time' (Sec. III B). This is a fit, but it is peripheral to the central claims.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Point-like resonant scatterers with Lorentzian polarizability α(ω) in a two-dimensional waveguide accurately model resonant disordered media.
Used throughout Sec. II A; the entire simulation and theory rest on the coupled-dipole model with dressed polarizability.
domain assumption DMPK bimodal distribution P(T) and localization formulas apply to resonant media when ℓ(ω) is computed via Eq. (13).
Invoked in Sec. II B, Eqs. (14)-(15); the paper notes this is 'unsurprising' but does not derive it for resonant scatterers.
domain assumption The energy velocity vE(ω) is given by Eq. (32), adapted from Ref. [30] to two dimensions and valid in the dilute regime k0a >> 1.
Assumed in Sec. III B and central to the resonant broadening of P(τ).
ad hoc to paper The scaling τmax ∝ τTh from nonresonant media transfers to resonant media, giving Eq. (33).
Stated explicitly in Sec. III B before Eq. (33): 'Assuming that the scaling of τmax with τTh must hold for resonant media'.
domain assumption Localized-regime dwell-time tail P(τ) ∼ 1/τ^2 is extrapolated from nonresonant Wigner time results.
Eq. (36) extrapolates Refs. [46-48] to resonant cases and is used for the localized dwell-time enhancement claims.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Open and trapping channels in complex resonant media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AGV4QVJR

@misc{pith2026241119818,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Open and trapping channels in complex resonant media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AGV4QVJR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19818}
}

abstract

We present a statistical study of the transmission and dwell-time matrices in disordered media composed of resonators, focusing on how frequency detuning influences their eigenvalue distributions. Our analysis reveals that the distribution of transmission eigenvalues undergoes a transition from a monomodal to a bimodal profile, and back to monomodal, as the frequency approaches the resonant frequency of the particles. Moreover, the distribution of dwell-time eigenvalues broadens significantly near resonance, with the longest lifetimes exceeding the median by several orders of magnitude. These results are explained by examining how frequency $\omega$ affects the transport mean free path of light, $\ell(\omega)$, and the energy transport velocity, $v_E(\omega)$, which in turn shape the observed distributions. We demonstrate the strong potential of wavefront shaping to enhance both transmission and energy storage in resonant disordered media. In the diffusive regime, where the system thickness $L$ exceeds the mean free path, both transmission and dwell time can be enhanced by a factor $\varpropto L/\ell(\omega) \gg 1$ when using wavefronts associated with the largest eigenvalues instead of plane waves. In the localized regime, the enhancements become $\varpropto Ne^{2L/\xi}$ for transmission and $\varpropto N\xi /L$ for dwell time, where $\xi$ is the localization length and $N$ is the number of controlled scattering channels. Finally, we show that employing high-$Q$ resonators instead of low-$Q$ ones increases energy storage within the medium by a factor of $\varpropto Q/k\ell(\omega)$, in both the diffusive and localized regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19818 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Probability distribution of the eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Intensity maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Probability distribution of the eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Maximal dwell-time in the diffusive regime for mod [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Intensity maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Radiant Field Theory: A Transport Approach to Shaped Wave Transmission through Disordered Media
math-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

A new radiant field theory derives the transmission eigenvalue distribution for waves through disordered waveguides beyond the diffusive regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[30]

Lagendijk and B

A. Lagendijk and B. A. van Tiggelen, Resonant multiple scattering of light, Physics Reports 270, 143 (1996)

work page 1996
[1]

Shi and A

Z. Shi and A. Z. Genack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 043901 (2012)

work page 2012
[2]

Sarma, A

R. Sarma, A. G. Yamilov, S. Petrenko, Y. Bromberg, and H. Cao, Control of energy density inside a disordered medium by coupling to open or closed channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086803 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

Bender, A

N. Bender, A. Yamilov, A. Goetschy, H. Yılmaz, C. W. Hsu, and H. Cao, Depth-targeted energy delivery deep inside scattering media, Nature Physics 18, 309 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, Measuring the transmission ma- trix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100601 (2010)

2010
[5]

C. W. Hsu, S. F. Liew, A. Goetschy, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Correlation-enhanced control of wave focusing in 13 disordered media, Nature Physics 13, 497 (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

Y. Choi, C. Yoon, M. Kim, T. D. Yang, C. Fang-Yen, R. R. Dasari, K. J. Lee, and W. Choi, Scanner-free and wide-field endoscopic imaging by using a single multi- mode optical fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203901 (2012)

work page 2012
[7]

Pl¨ oschner, T

M. Pl¨ oschner, T. Tyc, and T. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, Seeing through chaos in multimode fibres, Nat. Photonics 9, 529 (2015)

work page 2015

Show all 54 references

[8]

M. W. Matth` es, Y. Bromberg, J. de Rosny, and S. M. Popoff, Learning and avoiding disorder in multimode fibers, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021060 (2021)

2021
[9]

Badon, V

A. Badon, V. Barolle, K. Irsch, A. C. Boccara, M. Fink, and A. Aubry, Distortion matrix concept for deep op- tical imaging in scattering media, Science Advances 6, 10.1126/sciadv.aay7170 (2020)

2020 doi
[10]

H. Lee, S. Yoon, P. Loohuis, J. H. Hong, S. Kang, and W. Choi, High-throughput volumetric adaptive optical imaging using compressed time-reversal matrix, Light: Science & Applications 11, 16 (2022)

2022
[11]

Lagendijk, A

A. Lagendijk, A. P. Mosk, M. Fink, and G. Lerosey, Con- trolling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media (review), Nature Photon.6, 283 (2012)

2012
[12]

H. Cao, A. P. Mosk, and S. Rotter, Shaping the propa- gation of light in complex media, Nature Physics 18, 994 (2022)

2022
[13]

C. Texier, Wigner time delay and related concepts: Ap- plication to transport in coherent conductors, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 82, 16 (2016), frontiers in quantum electronic transport - In memory of Markus B ˜A¼ttiker

2016
[14]

Rotter and S

S. Rotter and S. Gigan, Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015005 (2017)

2017
[15]

Durand, S

M. Durand, S. M. Popoff, R. Carminati, and A. Goetschy, Optimizing light storage in scattering media with the dwell-time operator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 243901 (2019)

2019
[16]

Yariv, Y

A. Yariv, Y. Xu, R. K. Lee, and A. Scherer, Coupled- resonator optical waveguide: a proposal and analysis, Opt. Lett. 24, 711 (1999)

1999
[17]

Goetschy and S

A. Goetschy and S. E. Skipetrov, Euclidean matrix the- ory of random lasing in a cloud of cold atoms, EPL 96, 34005 (2011)

2011
[18]

C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, Bound states in the continuum, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 16048 EP (2016)

2016
[19]

M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nature Photonics 11, 543 EP (2017)

2017
[20]

Shahmoon, D

E. Shahmoon, D. S. Wild, M. D. Lukin, and S. F. Yelin, Cooperative resonances in light scattering from two-dimensional atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 113601 (2017)

2017
[21]

Lalanne, W

P. Lalanne, W. Yan, K. Vynck, C. Sauvan, and J.-P. Hugonin, Light interaction with photonic and plasmonic resonances, Laser & Photonics Reviews 12, 1700113 (2018)

2018
[22]

D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 031002 (2018)

2018
[23]

del Hougne, R

P. del Hougne, R. Sobry, O. Legrand, F. Mortessagne, U. Kuhl, and M. Davy, Experimental realization of opti- mal energy storage in resonators embedded in scattering media, Laser & Photonics Reviews 15, 2000335 (2021)

2021
[24]

P. Hong, O. S. Ojambati, A. Lagendijk, A. P. Mosk, and W. L. Vos, Three-dimensional spatially resolved optical energy density enhanced by wavefront shaping, Optica5, 844 (2018)

2018
[25]

Labeyrie, E

G. Labeyrie, E. Vaujour, C. A. M¨ uller, D. Delande, C. Miniatura, D. Wilkowski, and R. Kaiser, Slow dif- fusion of light in a cold atomic cloud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 223904 (2003)

2003
[26]

Sapienza, P

R. Sapienza, P. D. Garc ´ ıa, J. Bertolotti, M. D. Mart ´ ın, A. Blanco, L. Vi˜ na, C. L´ opez, and D. S. Wiersma, Ob- servation of resonant behavior in the energy velocity of diffused light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 233902 (2007)

2007
[27]

Tallon, T

B. Tallon, T. Brunet, and J. H. Page, Impact of strong scattering resonances on ballistic and diffusive wave transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 164301 (2017)

2017
[28]

Lemoult, N

F. Lemoult, N. Kaina, M. Fink, and G. Lerosey, Wave propagation control at the deep subwavelength scale in metamaterials, Nat. Phys. 9, 55 (2013)

2013
[29]

L. V. Hau, S. E. Harris, Z. Dutton, and C. H. Behroozi, Nature 397, 599 (1999)

1999
[31]

Akkermans and G

E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux, Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

2007
[32]

D. S. Fisher and P. A. Lee, Relation between conductivity and transmission matrix, Phys. Rev. B 23, 6851 (1981)

1981
[33]

C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997)

1997
[34]

Carminati and J

R. Carminati and J. Schotland, Principles of Scatter- ing and Transport of Light(Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), 2021)

2021
[35]

Monsarrat, R

R. Monsarrat, R. Pierrat, A. Tourin, and A. Goetschy, Pseudogap and Anderson localization of light in corre- lated disordered media, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 033246 (2022)

2022
[36]

Dorokhov, On the coexistence of localized and ex- tended electronic states in the metallic phase, Solid State Communications 51, 381 (1984)

O. Dorokhov, On the coexistence of localized and ex- tended electronic states in the metallic phase, Solid State Communications 51, 381 (1984)

1984
[37]

P. A. Mello, P. Pereyra, and N. Kumar, Macroscopic approach to multichannel disordered conductors, Ann. Phys. (NY) 181, 290 (1988)

1988
[38]

Imry, Active transmission channels and universal con- ductance fluctuations, Europhysics Letters 1, 249 (1986)

Y. Imry, Active transmission channels and universal con- ductance fluctuations, Europhysics Letters 1, 249 (1986)

1986
[39]

V. A. Gopar and R. A. Molina, Controlling conductance statistics of quantum wires by driving ac fields, Phys. Rev. B 81, 195415 (2010)

2010
[40]

Abrikosov, The paradox with the static conductivity of a one-dimensional metal, Solid State Communications 37, 997 (1981)

A. Abrikosov, The paradox with the static conductivity of a one-dimensional metal, Solid State Communications 37, 997 (1981)

1981
[41]

M. Davy, Z. Shi, J. Park, C. Tian, and A. Genack, Universal structure of transmission eigenchannels inside opaque media, Nature communications 6, 6893 (2015)

2015
[42]

Pe˜ na, A

A. Pe˜ na, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, S. Rotter, and A. A. Chabanov, The single-channel regime of transport through random media, Nature Communications 5, 3488 (2014)

2014
[43]

Davy and A

M. Davy and A. Z. Genack, Selectively exciting quasi- normal modes in open disordered systems, Nature Com- munications 9, 4714 (2018)

2018
[44]

Landau, L

L. Landau, L. Pitaevskii, and E. Lifshitz, Electrodynam- ics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed., Vol. 8 (Elsevier, 1984). 14

1984
[45]

Pierrat, P

R. Pierrat, P. Ambichl, S. Gigan, A. Haber, R. Carmi- nati, and S. Rotter, Invariance property of wave scattering through disordered media, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 17765 (2014), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1417725111

2014 doi
[46]

Texier and A

C. Texier and A. Comtet, Universality of the wigner time delay distribution for one-dimensional random po- tentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4220 (1999)

1999
[47]

Ossipov, T

A. Ossipov, T. Kottos, and T. Geisel, Statistical prop- erties of phases and delay times of the one-dimensional anderson model with one open channel, Phys. Rev. B 61, 11411 (2000)

2000
[48]

C. J. Bolton-Heaton, C. J. Lambert, V. I. Fal’ko, V. Prigodin, and A. J. Epstein, Distribution of time constants for tunneling through a one-dimensional dis- ordered chain, Phys. Rev. B 60, 10569 (1999)

1999
[49]

Ossipov, Scattering approach to anderson localization, Phys

A. Ossipov, Scattering approach to anderson localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 076601 (2018)

2018
[50]

Kottos, Statistics of resonances and delay times in random media: beyond random matrix theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 38, 10761 (2005)

T. Kottos, Statistics of resonances and delay times in random media: beyond random matrix theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 38, 10761 (2005)

2005
[51]

Laurent, O

D. Laurent, O. Legrand, P. Sebbah, C. Vanneste, and F. Mortessagne, Localized modes in a finite-size open dis- ordered microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 253902 (2007)

2007
[52]

G. J. Aubry, L. S. Froufe-P´ erez, U. Kuhl, O. Legrand, F. Scheffold, and F. Mortessagne, Experimental tuning of transport regimes in hyperuniform disordered photonic materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 127402 (2020)

2020
[53]

Novotny and B

L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012
[54]

Castani´ e, R

E. Castani´ e, R. Vincent, R. Pierrat, and R. Carminati, Absorption by an Optical Dipole Antenna in a Structured Environment, International Journal of Optics 2012, 1 (2012)

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [30]

Lagendijk and B

A. Lagendijk and B. A. van Tiggelen, Resonant multiple scattering of light, Physics Reports 270, 143 (1996)

work page 1996

[2] [1]

Shi and A

Z. Shi and A. Z. Genack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 043901 (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [2]

Sarma, A

R. Sarma, A. G. Yamilov, S. Petrenko, Y. Bromberg, and H. Cao, Control of energy density inside a disordered medium by coupling to open or closed channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 086803 (2016)

work page 2016

[4] [3]

Bender, A

N. Bender, A. Yamilov, A. Goetschy, H. Yılmaz, C. W. Hsu, and H. Cao, Depth-targeted energy delivery deep inside scattering media, Nature Physics 18, 309 (2022)

work page 2022

[5] [4]

S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, Measuring the transmission ma- trix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100601 (2010)

2010

[6] [5]

C. W. Hsu, S. F. Liew, A. Goetschy, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Correlation-enhanced control of wave focusing in 13 disordered media, Nature Physics 13, 497 (2017)

work page 2017

[7] [6]

Y. Choi, C. Yoon, M. Kim, T. D. Yang, C. Fang-Yen, R. R. Dasari, K. J. Lee, and W. Choi, Scanner-free and wide-field endoscopic imaging by using a single multi- mode optical fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203901 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [7]

Pl¨ oschner, T

M. Pl¨ oschner, T. Tyc, and T. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, Seeing through chaos in multimode fibres, Nat. Photonics 9, 529 (2015)

work page 2015