REVIEW 3 cited by
Evaluating Large Language Models on Business Process Modeling: Framework, Benchmark, and Self-Improvement Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming various fields, and their potential in Business Process Management (BPM) is substantial. This paper assesses the capabilities of LLMs on business process modeling using a framework for automating this task, a comprehensive benchmark, and an analysis of LLM self-improvement strategies. We present a comprehensive evaluation of 16 state-of-the-art LLMs from major AI vendors using a custom-designed benchmark of 20 diverse business processes. Our analysis highlights significant performance variations across LLMs and reveals a positive correlation between efficient error handling and the quality of generated models. It also shows consistent performance trends within similar LLM groups. Furthermore, we investigate LLM self-improvement techniques, encompassing self-evaluation, input optimization, and output optimization. Our findings indicate that output optimization, in particular, offers promising potential for enhancing quality, especially in models with initially lower performance. Our contributions provide insights for leveraging LLMs in BPM, paving the way for more advanced and automated process modeling techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Generalist LLMs: Specialist Agentic Systems for Structured Code Workflow Execution
A specialist BPMN-to-agent pipeline beats general-purpose coding agents on tool-use accuracy, latency, and token cost for deterministic business workflows.
-
Assessing the Business Process Modeling Competences of Large Language Models
Open-source LLMs can produce BPMN process models that rival human experts on syntax and readability, but they lag on semantic accuracy and frequently generate invalid BPMN-XML.
-
What is the Best Process Model Representation? A Comparative Analysis for Process Modeling with Large Language Models
A new dataset and head-to-head comparison of nine process model representations with LLMs finds Mermaid best for general use and BPMN text best for generation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.