Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Evaluating Large Language Models on Business Process Modeling: Framework, Benchmark, and Self-Improvement Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00023 v1 pith:T2IF3MTT submitted 2024-11-17 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords llmsbusinessmodelsprocessanalysisbenchmarkmodelingoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming various fields, and their potential in Business Process Management (BPM) is substantial. This paper assesses the capabilities of LLMs on business process modeling using a framework for automating this task, a comprehensive benchmark, and an analysis of LLM self-improvement strategies. We present a comprehensive evaluation of 16 state-of-the-art LLMs from major AI vendors using a custom-designed benchmark of 20 diverse business processes. Our analysis highlights significant performance variations across LLMs and reveals a positive correlation between efficient error handling and the quality of generated models. It also shows consistent performance trends within similar LLM groups. Furthermore, we investigate LLM self-improvement techniques, encompassing self-evaluation, input optimization, and output optimization. Our findings indicate that output optimization, in particular, offers promising potential for enhancing quality, especially in models with initially lower performance. Our contributions provide insights for leveraging LLMs in BPM, paving the way for more advanced and automated process modeling techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Generalist LLMs: Specialist Agentic Systems for Structured Code Workflow Execution

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A specialist BPMN-to-agent pipeline beats general-purpose coding agents on tool-use accuracy, latency, and token cost for deterministic business workflows.

  2. Assessing the Business Process Modeling Competences of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open-source LLMs can produce BPMN process models that rival human experts on syntax and readability, but they lag on semantic accuracy and frequently generate invalid BPMN-XML.

  3. What is the Best Process Model Representation? A Comparative Analysis for Process Modeling with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new dataset and head-to-head comparison of nine process model representations with LLMs finds Mermaid best for general use and BPMN text best for generation.

Pith tools