Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Regularity and existence for semilinear mixed local-nonlocal equations with variable singularities and measure data

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The mixed local-nonlocal singular equation has weak solutions even when the singular exponent varies and both source terms are measures.

desk verdict New existence and regularity for mixed local-nonlocal singular problems with variable exponent and measure data; the proof is sound apart from two small repairable gaps. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00755 v2 pith:GYUTGWDC submitted 2024-12-01 math.AP

Sanjit Biswas , Prashanta Garain This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35M1035M1235J7535R0635R1135B65
keywords mixedlocal-nonlocaloperatorsingularnonlinearityvariableexponentmeasuredataweaksolutionexistenceregularitycapacity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the mixed local-nonlocal semilinear problem with a singular nonlinearity whose exponent varies from point to point has weak solutions even when the data are measures. The central result, Theorem 2.12, proves existence of a solution in $W^{1,p}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Omega)\cap L^1(\Omega)$ for every $1

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by an approximation scheme combined with a priori estimates that are stable under passage to the limit. For each $n$, the singular data are truncated and regularized, producing problems with data $T_n(f)+h_n$ and $g_n$, whose unique weak solutions $u_n\in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$ are obtained by Schauder's fixed point theorem (Lemma 5.1). The measure $\nu$ is decomposed via capacity theory as $\nu = f - \operatorname{div} G$ with $f\in L^1$ and $G\in (L^{p'})^N$, following [13]; this decomposition lets the singular term be distributed across a density and a divergence, and the approximation inherits this structure. The core estimates, Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.3, use the truncation operators $T_k$ and $G_k$ and the boundary-layer condition $(P_{\varepsilon,\delta_*})$ to prove uniform boundedness: Marcinkiewicz-type bounds on $\nabla u_n$ and $\nabla G_k(u_n)$ in $M^{N/(N-1)}(\Omega)$, local $W^{1,2}$ bounds on $T_k(u_n)$, and global $W^{1,2}$ bounds on $T_k(u_n)^{(\delta_*+1)/2}$. These bounds give compactness and, after passing to the limit in the weak formulation with carefully chosen test functions, produce the weak solution. The regularity theorems are built on comparison with solutions of the singular-only and perturbation-only problems, using the pointwise estimate $u_n \le v_n + w_n$ and Moser-type iteration arguments.

What would settle it

For the unit ball with constant exponent $\delta=1$, take $\nu=dx$ (Lebesgue measure) and $\mu=c\,\delta_0$ (Dirac mass at the centre, $c>0$). Theorem 2.16 predicts a weak solution in $W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$. Using the Green's function of $-\Delta+(-\Delta)^s$, which has the same $|x-y|^{2-N}$ singularity as the Laplacian, compute the Dirichlet energy of the candidate limit and the value of $\int \varphi/u\,d\mu$; if no finite-energy limit exists or that integral diverges for every admissible $\varphi$, the simultaneous-measure existence claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper proves that for a bounded Lipschitz domain $\Omega$ and the operator $M=-\operatorname{div}(A\nabla)+B$ with uniformly elliptic $A$ and a symmetric kernel $K$ satisfying the fractional bounds (1.3), the problem $Mu = \nu/u^{\delta(x)} + \mu$ with $u=0$ in $\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\Omega$ and $u>0$ admits a weak solution under the following hypotheses: $\delta:\Omega\to(0,\infty)$ is continuous (locally Lipschitz in Theorem 2.12) and satisfies the boundary-layer condition $(P_{\varepsilon,\delta_*})$; $\nu$ is a non-negative bounded Radon measure, non-singular with respect to Lebesgue measure and belonging to $M^p_0(\Omega)$ for some $1<p<N/(N-1)$; $\mu$ is a non-negative bounded Radon measure. The solution lies in $W^{1,p}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Omega)\cap L^1(\Omega)$, with $u\in W^{1,p}_0(\Omega)$ if $\delta_*=1$ and with the truncations $T_k(u)\in W^{1,2}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Omega)$ and $T_k(u)^{(\delta_*+1)/2}\in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$ if $\delta_*>1$. When $\delta$ is constant, Theorem 2.16 relaxes the assumptions: $\mu$ may be in a Lebesgue space and $\nu$ may be a measure in a capacity class, and again a weak solution exists with regularity depending on whether $\delta\le 1$ or $\delta>1$. The regularity results, Theorems 2.18–2.20, assert that when the data are integrable, the solution inherits explicit Lebesgue integrability: for instance, $r,m>N/2$ forces $L^\infty$, and otherwise the solution lies in spaces such as $L^{m^{**}}$ or $L^{Nr(\delta+1)/(N-2r)}$. The simultaneous-measure phenomenon, in which both the singular source and the perturbing source are measures, is new even in the constant exponent case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the singular exponent $\delta(x)$ is bounded above by some $\delta_*\ge 1$ in a thin boundary layer of the domain; without this bound, the a priori estimates that control the singular term near the boundary and allow passage to the limit are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any bounded Lipschitz domain and any continuous $\delta$ satisfying $(P_{\varepsilon,\delta_*})$ with $\delta_*=1$, Theorem 2.12 gives a solution in $W^{1,p}_0(\Omega)$ for every $1<p<N/(N-1)$, so the boundary condition is attained in the usual Sobolev sense.
  • If $\delta_*>1$, the solution still belongs to $W^{1,p}_{\mathrm{loc}}(\Omega)\cap L^1(\Omega)$, with the nonlinear truncation $T_k(u)^{(\delta_*+1)/2}$ in $W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)$; this quantifies how much regularity survives when the singular exponent is large near the boundary.
  • In the constant-exponent case, both $\nu$ and $\mu$ can be measures at the same time (with $\nu$ non-singular and in $M^q_0$), which extends the mixed local-nonlocal theory beyond prior results where at least one source was integrable.
  • When $\nu\in L^r$ and $\mu\in L^m$, the solution inherits explicit Lebesgue regularity: $r,m>N/2$ gives $L^\infty$, and otherwise the solution lies in the stated spaces $L^{m^{**}}$, $L^{Nr(\delta+1)/(N-2r)}$, or their minima, so the integrability threshold $N/2$ of the local Laplacian is preserved in the mixed setting.
  • Remark 2.17 notes that the same existence statements hold for the purely local operator $A$ alone, so the results are new for local variable-exponent singular equations with measure data as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The non-singularity assumption on $\nu$ may be inessential: the capacity decomposition already handles the singular part, so a different limiting argument might extend Theorem 2.16 to purely singular $\nu$, making the simultaneous-measure result hold for all bounded Radon measures.
  • The boundary-layer condition $(P_{\varepsilon,\delta_*})$ is used only through uniform lower bounds away from the boundary and control of $\delta$ near $\partial\Omega$; this suggests the theorem could generalize to non-Lipschitz domains if the boundary layer were replaced by a weight, though the Marcinkiewicz estimates would need to be reworked.
  • Because the mixed operator combines a local second-order term and a nonlocal fractional term, the regularity thresholds in Theorems 2.18–2.20 are set by the local operator ($N/2$); a natural test is whether the fractional order $s$ affects intermediate regularity, for instance by checking if the $L^\infty$ condition can be relaxed when $s$ is close to $1$.
  • The comparison estimate $u_n\le v_n+w_n$ in Lemma 5.4 is a linearization device; the same device could yield gradient estimates for the singular term alone, potentially leading to Hölder regularity under stronger integrability of the data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies existence and regularity for the mixed local-nonlocal semilinear problem (1.1), in which the singular exponent δ(x) is variable and the data include measures: ν is a non-singular measure in M^p_0(Ω) and μ is a bounded Radon measure in the main variable-exponent theorem, while in the constant-exponent theorem both ν and μ are measures. The main existence results are Theorem 2.12 (variable δ under condition (P_{ε,δ*})), Theorem 2.13 (ν∈L^1), and Theorem 2.16 (constant δ with μ∈L^{N(δ+1)/(N+2δ)}), yielding weak solutions in the expected classes W^{1,p}_{loc}(Ω)∩L^1(Ω), with energy-type regularity for truncations when δ*>1. The proofs use a fixed-point approximation scheme, uniform a priori estimates for approximating solutions (Section 5), and passage to the limit via monotonicity, Marcinkiewicz bounds, and compactness. The paper also states regularity conclusions in Theorems 2.18–2.20 for integrable data. The central novelty claimed is the treatment of variable singular exponents with measure data, and the fact that both source terms can simultaneously be measures even for constant δ.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper closes a genuine gap in the literature: mixed local-nonlocal singular problems with variable exponent had not been treated with measure data, and the simultaneous measure case for the perturbed problem appears new even for constant δ. The proofs are substantial and mostly transparent: the a priori estimates in Lemmas 5.2, 5.3, and 5.6–5.8 are detailed, the approximation scheme in Section 5.1 follows standard fixed-point and comparison arguments, and the limiting procedures in Section 3 are standard once the estimates are in hand. A particular strength is that the main regularity conclusions are obtained through explicit comparison estimates between the perturbed solution and the purely singular and purely non-singular auxiliary solutions. The paper also clearly states the boundary-layer condition (P_{ε,δ*}) that makes the variable-exponent estimates work; this is an explicit hypothesis rather than a hidden assumption.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.11)] The passage to the limit in the term containing ∇δ defines r := min_Ω δ(x)>0 and then uses boundedness of log(x)/x^r on [C,∞). Since Ω is open and δ is only continuous, the minimum over Ω need not be attained, so the argument as written is not fully justified. However, the estimate is needed only on ω=supp φ, where r_ω:=min_ω δ(x)>0 is guaranteed by continuity and positivity of δ, and |∇δ|∈L∞(ω) follows from the local Lipschitz hypothesis. Replacing r by r_ω and applying dominated convergence on ω repairs the gap. This is a local but load-bearing point in the proof of Theorem 2.12, so it should be corrected explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Lemma 5.2(b), Theorems 2.12–2.13] The notation T_k^{(δ*+1)/2}(u) is used before being defined; it should be stated explicitly that this means (T_k(u))^{(δ*+1)/2}, not T_k evaluated at a power of u.
  2. [Section 1] There are repeated spelling errors: 'purturbed' should be 'perturbed' in the discussion of equations (1.6), (1.8), and (1.11).
  3. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.11)] In the same step, the sentence 'using this together with the fact lim_n ∫_Ω |G_n| = ∫_Ω |G|' should explicitly mention that strong convergence in L^{p'} on a bounded domain gives convergence in L^1, so that a generalized dominated convergence theorem applies to the terms |G_n| times a uniformly bounded factor.
  4. [Section 3.3] The proof of Theorem 2.16 is very terse, saying only that the limit is passed 'along the lines of the proof of Theorem 2.12.' Since the exponent q and the test functions in Lemma 5.3 differ from those in Lemma 5.2, a short indication of how the nonlocal term and the singular measure term are handled in this case would improve verifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the existence and regularity proofs are self-contained, and the self-citations used are independent prior theorems rather than restatements of the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central claims, Theorems 2.12, 2.13, and 2.16, are derived through an approximation scheme rather than by assuming the conclusion. The approximate problems (5.1), (3.1), and (3.16) are solved by fixed point arguments in Lemma 5.1, and the passage to the limit in Section 3 is driven by the uniform a priori estimates in Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3. These estimates are genuine derivations: they use explicit test functions such as T_l(u_n), G_k(u_n), and T_k^{(δ*+1)/2}(u_n), and they depend on the stated condition (P_{ε,δ*}) in an essential but non-circular way. The condition is an explicit hypothesis restricting δ near the boundary; it is not defined in terms of the solution or the conclusion. The limiting argument for the singular measure term reduces ν_s = H - div G via Theorem 2.6 and Lemma 2.9, then passes to the limit term by term in (3.3)-(3.12), with the lower bound u_n ≥ C(ω) coming from a comparison argument. The authors do rely on results from their own prior work: [31, Lemma 4.6] supplies the comparison function w solving (5.9) with bounded data T_1(f), [31, Theorem 3.10] gives the strong maximum principle, and [35, Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2] provide bounded approximating solutions for problems with integrable right-hand sides. These are independent published theorems whose hypotheses do not include the present measure-data or perturbed-measure conclusions, so they do not constitute circular support. There is a small technical imprecision in the proof of (3.11): the text defines r := min_Ω δ(x) > 0, but a positive continuous function on a bounded open set need not attain a positive minimum. However, the estimate is only needed on ω = supp φ ⊂⊂ Ω, where min_ω δ(x) > 0 is guaranteed by continuity and positivity of δ, so replacing r by r_ω repairs the argument without changing the theorem. This is a correctness-style gap, not a circularity. The paper also benchmarks itself against external results ([7], [14], [45], [31], [34]) and does not merely rename a known pattern. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors is used to forbid alternatives, and no equation in the proof reduces by construction to an earlier equation or to the hypothesis. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to the paper's own claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is carried by the problem setup (bounded Lipschitz domain, elliptic matrix and kernel), the hypotheses on δ (continuity plus boundary condition (P_{ε,δ*}) and in one theorem local Lipschitz continuity), the capacity condition on ν, and several external theorems: the Boccardo-Gallouet-Orsina decomposition, the measure approximation lemma, the positivity/comparison results from the authors' previous works [31,35], and the strong maximum principle for the mixed operator. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Ω ⊂ R^N (N>2) is a bounded Lipschitz domain; 0<s<1; A(x) satisfies (1.2); K(x,y) satisfies (1.3).
    Problem setup in (1.1) used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption δ is continuous and satisfies (P_{ε,δ*}) for some δ* ≥ 1, ε > 0; in Theorem 2.12 δ is also locally Lipschitz.
    Stated before Theorem 2.12; used in Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.6 to control the variable exponent near the boundary.
  • domain assumption ν is a non-negative bounded Radon measure on Ω, ν ∈ M^p_0(Ω), and ν is non-singular with respect to Lebesgue measure.
    Hypothesis of Theorems 2.12 and 2.16; ensures the singular part can be represented and the absolutely continuous part is nonzero.
  • standard math Theorem 2.6 (Boccardo, Gallouet, Orsina): each ν ∈ M^p_0(Ω) decomposes as f - div G with f ∈ L^1(Ω), G ∈ (L^{p'}(Ω))^N.
    Takes the decomposition theorem from the cited literature (Theorem 2.6), used to handle the singular part of the measure.
  • standard math Lemma 2.9 (measure approximation): the decomposition f - div G can be approximated by h_n = H_n - div G_n with H_n ∈ L^2, G_n → G in (L^{p'})^N.
    Used to build approximating problems (3.1) and (3.16).
  • standard math Lemma 4.6 of [31]: the comparison problem (5.9) has a positive solution w with uniform lower bounds on compact subsets.
    Used in Lemma 5.1 to obtain uniform positivity of the approximating solutions u_n; [31] is the authors' own published work.
  • standard math Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.2 of [35]: existence of bounded weak solutions to approximate problems (5.39), (5.40), (5.41).
    Used in Section 5.4 to set up the comparison argument for regularity; [35] is the authors' own published work.
  • standard math Theorem 3.10 of [31]: strong maximum principle for the mixed operator M.
    Used in Lemma 5.1 to pass from u_n ≥ 0 to u_n > 0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity and existence for semilinear mixed local-nonlocal equations with variable singularities and measure data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GYUTGWDC

@misc{pith2026241200755,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity and existence for semilinear mixed local-nonlocal equations with variable singularities and measure data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GYUTGWDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00755}
}
read the original abstract

This article proves the existence and regularity of weak solutions for a class of mixed local-nonlocal problems with singular nonlinearities. We examine both the purely singular problem and perturbed singular problems. A central contribution of this work is the inclusion of a variable singular exponent in the context of measure-valued data. Another notable feature is that the source terms in both the purely singular and perturbed components can simultaneously take the form of measures. To the best of our knowledge, this phenomenon is new, even in the case of a constant singular exponent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [31]

    On the regularity theory for mixed anisotropic and nonlocal p-Laplace equations and its applications to singular proble ms

    Prashanta Garain, Wontae Kim, and Juha Kinnunen. On the regularity theory for mixed anisotropic and nonlocal p-Laplace equations and its applications to singular proble ms. Forum Math., 36(3):697–715, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [35]

    Mixed local and nonlocal Sobolev inequalities with extremal and associated quasilinear singular ellipti c problems

    Prashanta Garain and Alexander Ukhlov. Mixed local and nonlocal Sobolev inequalities with extremal and associated quasilinear singular ellipti c problems. Nonlinear Anal. , 223:Paper No. 113022, 35, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    Alves, Carlos Alberto Santos, and Thiago W illians Siqueira

    Claudianor O. Alves, Carlos Alberto Santos, and Thiago W illians Siqueira. Uniqueness in W 1,p(x) loc (Ω) and continuity up to portions of the boundary of positive solutions for a strongly-singular elliptic problem. J. Differential Equations , 269(12):11279–11327, 2020. Mixed local-nonlocal singular problem 34

    work page 2020

  4. [2]

    Multiplicity of soluti ons for a Dirichlet problem with a singular and a supercritical nonlinearities

    David Arcoya and Lucio Boccardo. Multiplicity of soluti ons for a Dirichlet problem with a singular and a supercritical nonlinearities. Differential Integral Equations , 26(1-2):119– 128, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [3]

    Multiplicity of solutions for a Dirichlet problem with a strongly singular nonlinearity

    David Arcoya and Lourdes Moreno-M´ erida. Multiplicity of solutions for a Dirichlet problem with a strongly singular nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal., 95:281–291, 2014

    2014

  6. [4]

    Radulescu

    Rakesh Arora and Vicentiu D. Radulescu. Combined effects i n mixed local-nonlocal sta- tionary problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mat hematics. Published online 2023:1-47 , 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [5]

    Multiplicity of solutions for mixed local-nonlocal elliptic equations with singular nonlinearity

    Kaushik Bal and Stuti Das. Multiplicity of solutions for mixed local-nonlocal elliptic equations with singular nonlinearity. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2405.05832, May 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [6]

    On an anisotropic p-Laplace equation with variable singular exponent

    Kaushik Bal, Prashanta Garain, and Tuhina Mukherjee. On an anisotropic p-Laplace equation with variable singular exponent. Adv. Differential Equations , 26(11-12):535– 562, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 50 references
  1. [7]

    Existence results for mixed local and nonlo- cal elliptic equations involving singularity and nonregul ar data

    Souvik Bhowmick and Sekhar Ghosh. Existence results for mixed local and nonlo- cal elliptic equations involving singularity and nonregul ar data. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2410.04441, October 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators: regularity and maximum princ iples

    Stefano Biagi, Serena Dipierro, Enrico Valdinoci, and E ugenio Vecchi. Mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators: regularity and maximum princ iples. Comm. Partial Differ- ential Equations , 47(3):585–629, 2022

    2022

  3. [9]

    A Hong-Krahn- Szeg¨ o inequality for mixed local and nonlocal operators

    Stefano Biagi, Serena Dipierro, Enrico Valdinoci, and E ugenio Vecchi. A Hong-Krahn- Szeg¨ o inequality for mixed local and nonlocal operators. Math. Eng. (Springfield) , 5(1):25, 2023. Id/No 14

    2023

  4. [10]

    A Br ezis-Oswald approach for mixed local and nonlocal operators

    Stefano Biagi, Dimitri Mugnai, and Eugenio Vecchi. A Br ezis-Oswald approach for mixed local and nonlocal operators. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 26(2):28, 2024. Id/No 2250057

    2024

  5. [11]

    Mixed local and nonlocal equation with singular nonlinearity having variable exponent

    Kheireddine Biroud. Mixed local and nonlocal equation with singular nonlinearity having variable exponent. J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl. , 14(1):Paper No. 13, 24, 2023

    2023

  6. [12]

    Boun dary regularity of mixed local-nonlocal operators and its application

    Anup Biswas, Mitesh Modasiya, and Abhrojyoti Sen. Boun dary regularity of mixed local-nonlocal operators and its application. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 202(2):679–710, 2023

    2023

  7. [13]

    Existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations with measure da ta

    Lucio Boccardo, Thierry Gallou¨ et, and Luigi Orsina. Existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations with measure da ta. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 13(5):539–551, 1996

    1996

  8. [14]

    Semilinear elliptic e quations with singular nonlinear- ities

    Lucio Boccardo and Luigi Orsina. Semilinear elliptic e quations with singular nonlinear- ities. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 37(3-4):363–380, 2010. Mixed local-nonlocal singular problem 35

    2010

  9. [15]

    Buccheri, J

    S. Buccheri, J. V. da Silva, and L. H. de Miranda. A system of local/nonlocalp-laplacians: the eigenvalue problem and its asymptotic limit as p → ∞. Asymptotic Anal., 128(2):149– 181, 2022

    2022

  10. [16]

    Mixed local and nonlocal e quations with measure data

    Sun-Sig Byun and Kyeong Song. Mixed local and nonlocal e quations with measure data. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 62(1):Paper No. 14, 35, 2023

    2023

  11. [17]

    Nonlocal problems with singular nonlinearity

    Annamaria Canino, Luigi Montoro, Berardino Sciunzi, a nd Marco Squassina. Nonlocal problems with singular nonlinearity. Bull. Sci. Math. , 141(3):223–250, 2017

    2017

  12. [18]

    Vari- ational properties of nonlocal singular problems

    Annamaria Canino, Luigi Montoro, Berardino Sciunzi, a nd Alessandro Trombetta. Vari- ational properties of nonlocal singular problems. Nonlinearity, 36(8):4034–4052, 2023

    2023

  13. [19]

    Mart ´ ınez-Aparicio

    Jos´ e Carmona and Pedro J. Mart ´ ınez-Aparicio. A singular semilinear elliptic equation with a variable exponent. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. , 16(3):491–498, 2016

    2016

  14. [20]

    Riesz potential estimates for mixed local-nonlocal problems wit h measure data

    Iwona Chlebicka, Kyeong Song, Yeonghun Youn, and Anna Z atorska-Goldstein. Riesz potential estimates for mixed local-nonlocal problems wit h measure data. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2401.04549, January 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [21]

    M. G. Crandall, P. H. Rabinowitz, and L. Tartar. On a Diri chlet problem with a singular nonlinearity. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 2(2):193–222, 1977

    1977

  16. [22]

    Renormalized solu- tions of elliptic equations with general measure data

    Gianni Dal Maso, Fran¸ cois Murat, Luigi Orsina, and Ala in Prignet. Renormalized solu- tions of elliptic equations with general measure data. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) , 28(4):741–808, 1999

    1999

  17. [23]

    Ellipti c equations with general singular lower order term and measure data

    Linda Maria De Cave and Francescantonio Oliva. Ellipti c equations with general singular lower order term and measure data. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl., Ser. A, Theory Methods, 128:391–411, 2015

    2015

  18. [24]

    Gradient regularity in mixed local and nonlocal problems

    Cristiana De Filippis and Giuseppe Mingione. Gradient regularity in mixed local and nonlocal problems. Math. Ann. , 388(1):261–328, 2024

    2024

  19. [25]

    Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces

    Eleonora Di Nezza, Giampiero Palatucci, and Enrico Val dinoci. Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. Math. , 136(5):521–573, 2012

    2012

  20. [26]

    Serena Dipierro and Enrico Valdinoci. Description of a n ecological niche for a mixed local/nonlocal dispersal: an evolution equation and a new N eumann condition arising from the superposition of Brownian and L´ evy processes. Phys. A , 575:Paper No. 126052, 20, 2021

    2021

  21. [27]

    Lawrence C. Evans. Partial differential equations , volume 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second ed ition, 2010. Mixed local-nonlocal singular problem 36

    2010

  22. [28]

    Existence, Uniqueness of Positive Soluti on to a Fractional Laplacians with Singular Nonlinearity

    Yanqin Fang. Existence, Uniqueness of Positive Soluti on to a Fractional Laplacians with Singular Nonlinearity. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1403.3149, March 2014

    2014 arXiv

  23. [29]

    On a class of mixed local and nonlocal semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity

    Prashanta Garain. On a class of mixed local and nonlocal semilinear elliptic equation with singular nonlinearity. J. Geom. Anal. , 33(7):Paper No. 212, 20, 2023

    2023

  24. [30]

    On the regularity and existence of we ak solutions for a class of degenerate singular elliptic problem

    Prashanta Garain. On the regularity and existence of we ak solutions for a class of degenerate singular elliptic problem. Manuscripta Math. , 174(1-2):141–158, 2024

    2024

  25. [32]

    On the regularity t heory for mixed local and nonlocal quasilinear elliptic equations

    Prashanta Garain and Juha Kinnunen. On the regularity t heory for mixed local and nonlocal quasilinear elliptic equations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 375(8):5393–5423, 2022

    2022

  26. [33]

    Higher H¨ older reg ularity for mixed local and non- local degenerate elliptic equations

    Prashanta Garain and Erik Lindgren. Higher H¨ older reg ularity for mixed local and non- local degenerate elliptic equations. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 62(2):Paper No. 67, 36, 2023

    2023

  27. [34]

    Quasilinear no nlocal elliptic problems with variable singular exponent

    Prashanta Garain and Tuhina Mukherjee. Quasilinear no nlocal elliptic problems with variable singular exponent. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. , 19(11):5059–5075, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Sekhar Ghosh, Debajyoti Choudhuri, and Ratan Kr. Giri. Singular nonlocal problem involving measure data. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 50(1):187–209, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Nonlinear potential theory of de- generate elliptic equations

    Juha Heinonen, Tero Kilpel¨ ainen, and Olli Martio. Nonlinear potential theory of de- generate elliptic equations . Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2006. Unabridged republication of the 1993 original

    2006

  30. [38]

    Lazer-McKenna type pr oblem involving mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators

    Shuibo Huang and Hichem Hajaiej. Lazer-McKenna type pr oblem involving mixed local and nonlocal elliptic operators. Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications , 03 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications , volume 31 of Classics in Applied Mathematics

    David Kinderlehrer and Guido Stampacchia. An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications , volume 31 of Classics in Applied Mathematics . Society for In- dustrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA , 2000. Reprint of the 1980 original

    2000

  32. [40]

    Sur l’interpolation d’op´ erat ions

    Joseph Marcinkiewicz. Sur l’interpolation d’op´ erat ions. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris , 208:1272–1273, 1939. Mixed local-nonlocal singular problem 37

    1939

  33. [41]

    Murat and A

    F. Murat and A. Porretta. Stability properties, existe nce, and nonexistence of renor- malized solutions for elliptic equations with measure data . Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 27(11-12):2267–2310, 2002

    2002

  34. [42]

    On singu lar elliptic equations with measure sources

    Francescantonio Oliva and Francesco Petitta. On singu lar elliptic equations with measure sources. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. , 22(1):289–308, 2016

    2016

  35. [43]

    Finite a nd infinite energy solutions of singular elliptic problems: existence and uniqueness

    Francescantonio Oliva and Francesco Petitta. Finite a nd infinite energy solutions of singular elliptic problems: existence and uniqueness. J. Differ. Equations , 264(1):311– 340, 2018

    2018

  36. [44]

    Singula r elliptic pdes: an extensive overview, 2024

    Francescantonio Oliva and Francesco Petitta. Singula r elliptic pdes: an extensive overview, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    A Lazer-McKenna ty pe problem with measures

    Luigi Orsina and Francesco Petitta. A Lazer-McKenna ty pe problem with measures. Differential Integral Equations , 29(1-2):19–36, 2016

    2016

  38. [46]

    Existence of solut ions to semilinear elliptic equations with variable exponent singularity

    Ambesh Kumar Pandey and Rasmita Kar. Existence of solut ions to semilinear elliptic equations with variable exponent singularity. Rocky Mountain J. Math. , 53(3):903–913, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Real analysis

    Halsey Royden and Patrick Michael Fitzpatrick. Real analysis. China Machine Press, 2010

    2010

  40. [48]

    Salort and Eugenio Vecchi

    Ariel M. Salort and Eugenio Vecchi. On the mixed local-n onlocal H´ enon equation.Differ. Integral Equ., 35(11-12):795–818, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    On some regularity properties of mixed local and nonlocal elliptic equations

    Xifeng Su, Enrico Valdinoci, Yuanhong Wei, and Jiwen Zh ang. On some regularity properties of mixed local and nonlocal elliptic equations. J. Differ. Equations , 416:576– 613, 2025

    2025

  42. [50]

    The solvability and regularity results for elliptic equations involving mixed local and nonlocal p-Laplacian

    Jiaxiang Zhang and Shenzhou Zheng. The solvability and regularity results for elliptic equations involving mixed local and nonlocal p-Laplacian. J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ. , 10(2):1097–1122, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.