Sobolev estimates for parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form with degenerate coefficients

Hongjie Dong; Junhee Ryu

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Sobolev estimates for parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form with degenerate coefficients

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves well-posedness in weighted mixed-norm Sobolev spaces for degenerate parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form on the upper half-space with $x_d^2$-vanishing coefficients.

desk verdict A substantial extension of degenerate divergence-form maximal regularity, with one imported nondegenerate estimate that is only sketched; worth a serious referee but expect to chase the reduction in Remark 3.7. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00779 v2 pith:6ADLHZLT submitted 2024-12-01 math.AP

Hongjie Dong , Junhee Ryu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35J7035K6535D3035R05

keywords degeneratelinearequationsdivergenceformexistenceanduniquenessweightedSobolevspacesmixed-normestimatespartialBMOcoefficientsMuckenhouptweightsupperhalfspace

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes well-posedness and explicit a priori estimates for a broad class of degenerate parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form on the upper half-space, where the leading coefficients vanish like $x_d^2$ at the boundary. The coefficients are allowed to be rough: bounded, uniformly elliptic, measurable in the normal variable (and in time for the parabolic case), with only small mean oscillations in the tangential directions. Solutions are sought in weighted mixed-norm Sobolev spaces built on the integrability of $u$ and $x_d D_x u$, with a Muckenhoupt weight in time. A key feature is that when the zeroth-order damping $\lambda c_0 u$ is removed, the admissible weight exponent $\theta$ is tied to the ratios of the lower-order coefficients to $a_{dd}$ through an explicit quadratic equation, and the paper claims this range is optimal, deferring the proof to future work. If correct, the estimates provide maximal regularity for degenerate equations arising in finance, stochastic control, and conformal geometry.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three devices. First, testing the equation against $|u|^{p-2}u\,x_d^{\theta-1}$ combined with weighted Hardy's inequality yields the zeroth-order estimate, aided by a change of variables $y_i = x_i - \int_0^{x_d} (a_{id}+a_{di})/(2a_{dd})\,dr$ that makes the leading coefficient diagonal. Second, a localization argument freezes coefficients on balls, applies an assumed $H^1_{p,\omega}$ estimate for the nondegenerate frozen equation, and reassembles the pieces with a weighted partition of unity. Third, a level-set maximal-function argument ('crawling of ink spots') upgrades unmixed-norm estimates to mixed-norm estimates in time under Muckenhoupt weights. The quadratic $z^2 + (1+n_b+n_{\hat{b}})z - n_c = 0$ encodes the admissible $\theta$-range in the $\lambda=0$ case.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to verify the unproved nondegenerate estimate from Remark 3.7 by testing $a_0(x_d) = 1 + \varepsilon \sin(x_d)$, $c_0 = 1$, $a_{ij} = \delta_{ij}$ on the half-space: if the $H^1_{p,\omega}$ a priori bound fails with constants independent of $\varepsilon$ for some $p \in (1,\infty)$ and $A_p$ weight $\omega$, then Lemma 3.6 and the main theorems lose their foundation; for the optimality claim at $\lambda=0$ ($d \geq 2$), one can test whether the estimate (2.11) holds for some $\theta$ outside $\alpha p < \theta < \beta p$ using constant-coefficient operators with non-radial forcing, since the one-dimensional explicit solution (6.4) identifies the two endpoints as the only singular exponents.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the degenerate operator $L_p u = a_0 u_t - x_d^2 D_i(a_{ij} D_j u) + x_d b_i D_i u + x_d D_i(\hat{b}_i u) + c u$ on $(-\infty,T)\times\mathbb{R}^d_+$ and its elliptic analogue $L_e u = -x_d^2 D_i(a_{ij} D_j u) + x_d b_i D_i u + x_d D_i(\hat{b}_i u) + c u$ on $\mathbb{R}^d_+$, the paper proves that, under small partial-BMO assumptions on the coefficients, the equation $L u + \lambda c_0 u = D_i F + f$ admits a unique weak solution in the weighted mixed-norm Sobolev space $H^1_{q,p,\theta,\omega}(T)$, with the bound $(1+\sqrt{\lambda})\|u\| + \|x_d D_x u\| \leq N(\|x_d^{-1}F\| + (1+\sqrt{\lambda})^{-1}\|f\|)$. In the $\lambda = 0$ regime the admissible weight exponent is $\alpha p < \theta < \beta p$, where $\alpha < \beta$ are the two real roots of $z^2 + (1 + n_b + n_{\hat{b}})z - n_c = 0$ and $n_b = b_d/a_{dd}$, $n_{\hat{b}} = \hat{b}_d/a_{dd}$, $n_c = c/a_{dd}$; this range is asserted to be optimal, with proof deferred. In one spatial dimension the elliptic range widens to all $\theta$ except the two endpoints $\alpha p$ and $\beta p$.

Load-bearing premise

The higher-order estimates depend on an unproved solvability result for the nondegenerate 'frozen' equation with time- or $x_d$-dependent $a_0$ and $c_0$; the paper only sketches the reduction in Remark 3.7, and if that estimate fails the localization argument and the main theorems lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any $\lambda \geq \lambda_0$ sufficiently large, the parabolic theorem covers arbitrary $\theta \in \mathbb{R}$, so the weight can be tuned to the behavior of the forcing without further restrictions on the coefficients.
At $\lambda = 0$, the open interval $\alpha p < \theta < \beta p$ is the stated admissible range; in one space dimension the elliptic result widens to all $\theta$ except the two endpoints.
The Cauchy problem with zero initial data is solvable for every $\lambda \geq 0$ and every $\theta \in \mathbb{R}$, with the constant allowed to depend on the length of the time interval.
The coefficient class includes functions measurable in $(t,x_d)$ with small tangential BMO, a substantially larger class than the uniformly continuous or constant-coefficient settings treated earlier.
No boundary condition is imposed; the results concern minimal-assumption solvability, and boundary traces can be handled separately as indicated by prior work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the announced optimality of $\alpha p < \theta < \beta p$ is proved, it would show that in the undamped elliptic case the two endpoints are genuine thresholds: at $\theta = \alpha p$ or $\theta = \beta p$ some forcing in $L_{p,\theta}$ would have no solution in $H^1_{p,\theta}$, mirroring the one-dimensional explicit formula.
The dependence of Lemma 3.6 on the unproved nondegenerate estimate in Remark 3.7 is the point most worth checking; a failure there would not necessarily destroy the zeroth-order estimates but would break the higher-order localization and hence the main theorems.
Because the estimate is formulated with Muckenhoupt weights in time and mixed norms in space, the theory is ready-made for stochastic PDEs, where such spaces are standard, suggesting immediate applications to degenerate SPDEs with $x_d^2$-degenerate diffusion coefficients.
The change-of-variables technique used to diagonalize the leading coefficient is specific to the vanishing rate $x_d^2$; extending the method to $x_d^\alpha$ with $\alpha \neq 2$ would require a different model space and likely a different set of admissible weights.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague, here's my read of Dong–Ryu 2412.00779.

The headline result is genuinely new: weighted mixed-norm Sobolev well-posedness for L u = a0 u_t - x_d^2 D_i(a_ij D_j u)+lower terms with coefficients satisfying small partial-BMO in the tangential variables and measurability in (t,x_d) — with a_dd measurable in only one of them. That's a real jump from constant coefficients or uniformly continuous coefficients in [31,39,24]. The θ-range αp<θ<βp tied to the roots of z^2+(1+n_b+n_hatb)z-n_c=0 is explicit, and the analysis makes clear why it appears.

The proof is long but organized. The zeroth-order estimates (Lemma 3.4) are self-contained and detailed: test function, weighted Hardy, a change of variables to symmetrize the matrix. The mixed-norm step via level sets and the crawling-ink-spots lemma is also written out. Most of the structure is sound.

The soft spot is Lemma 3.6. The higher-order estimate applies an H^1_{p,ω} solvability result for a nondegenerate equation a0 u_t - D_i(a_ij D_j u)+λ c0 u = ... with a0 merely measurable in t or x_d. This is not proved in the paper. Remark 3.7 sketches a reduction: divide by a0, change y_d = ∫ a0, then follow [6] for ω=1 and [9] for weights. The reduction looks plausible — the new coefficients stay in the partially BMO class, with constants depending on K. But the details of the weighted mean-oscillation argument are not shown, and the citation to [9] (time-fractional equations) is not obviously on point. If that auxiliary estimate fails, the localization argument and hence Theorems 2.6/2.9/2.14 lose their footing. This is load-bearing, but it's also a known type of result; a referee can likely fill it or point to the correct reference.

A second, minor issue: the introduction claims the θ-range is optimal, but proof is deferred to future work. The main theorems don't need that claim; it should be labeled as a conjecture. There are also small typos (e.g., ν listed twice in Theorem 4.5's constant), but nothing structural.

Who should read this: anyone working on L_p theory for degenerate elliptic/parabolic equations or SPDEs with degenerate operators. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to peer review with a request that the authors either prove the auxiliary nondegenerate estimate in an appendix or pinpoint a theorem that covers exactly the (a0,c0) generality, including the A_p weight. Conditional acceptance is appropriate.

For me: cite-worthy if the auxiliary estimate checks out; I'd bring it to reading group.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies degenerate divergence-form parabolic and elliptic equations in the upper half-space R^d_+, with leading coefficients of the form x_d^2 a_ij, where a_ij are bounded, uniformly elliptic and measurably depend on (t,x_d), except a_dd which depends only on t or only on x_d, and have small partial BMO in the remaining spatial directions. The main results, Theorems 2.6, 2.9, and 2.14, establish well-posedness in weighted mixed-norm Sobolev spaces H^1_{q,p,theta,omega} together with estimates of the form (1+sqrt(lambda))||u|| + ||x_d D_x u|| <= N(||x_d^{-1} F|| + (1+sqrt(lambda))^{-1}||f||), either for large lambda under a general partial-BMO assumption or, when lambda=0, under stronger ratio assumptions with the admissible range alpha p < theta < beta p determined by the roots of the quadratic (2.8). The proof proceeds through zeroth-order energy estimates using weighted Hardy inequalities, higher-order localization to nondegenerate equations, level-set arguments with a crawling-of-ink-spots lemma, duality, and interpolation.

Significance. If the technical gaps are filled, this is a valuable contribution: it extends weighted mixed-norm L_p theory to a broad class of degenerate divergence-form operators with partially BMO coefficients, allows a_dd to be merely measurable in one variable, and identifies an explicit theta-range depending on the lower-order coefficient ratios, with connections to Black-Scholes-type equations and Loewner-Nirenberg-type problems. The zeroth-order estimates are derived from first principles with explicit test functions and Hardy inequalities, and the paper gives careful parameter dependencies. There is no circular derivation: the prior results cited are used as ingredients rather than as restatements of the target theorems. However, a load-bearing higher-order estimate is only outlined by reference to previous work, and the claimed optimality of the theta-range is deferred to future work.

major comments (1)

[§4, Lemma 4.1] The existence part of Lemma 4.1 invokes [4, Theorem 8.2] for local solvability on the sets A_k and then states, without proof, that the same result can be obtained for nonconstant a0 by following the proof of the theorem. The same phrase appears in the proof of Theorem 2.14. If this generalized local solvability is not established, the approximation argument producing u_k and the subsequential solution is incomplete. Please provide the details or state the precise cited theorem that already covers variable a0 and variable c0 in the needed form.

minor comments (5)

[Theorem 4.5] In (4.21) the constant is written as N = N(d,p,q,theta,nu,K,K0,nu), with nu repeated; the same duplication appears in Lemma 5.1.
[Remark 3.7] Please cite precise theorem or lemma numbers in [6] and [9] rather than saying 'following the arguments' and 'repeating the arguments'; this would greatly help verification of the claimed reduction.
[References] Reference [34] contains a typo: 'N.V. Krylov,,' has a double comma.
[Lemma 4.3] The definition of the maximal function contains a miswritten expression: 'sup_{t in (s-r,r)}' should be a supremum over intervals containing the point at which the maximal function is evaluated.
[Introduction] The sentence 'except a_dd, which is measurable in t or x_d' would be clearer as 'except a_dd, which is measurable only in t, or only in x_d'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the main a priori estimates are obtained by test-function arguments, Hardy's inequality, and localization, with cited nondegenerate Lp theory used as external input; the unproved auxiliary estimate in Remark 3.7 is a dependency gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity: the main theorems (2.6, 2.9, 2.14) are proved from weighted Hardy's inequality (Lemma 3.1), test-function estimates for simple coefficients (Lemma 3.4), localization and perturbation arguments (Lemmas 3.6 and 5.1), a level-set 'crawling of ink spots' argument (Lemma A.2), and standard extrapolation or interpolation. The only load-bearing ingredient imported from elsewhere is the nondegenerate H^1_{p,omega} solvability estimate used at (3.25) and sketched in Remark 3.7 through a change of variables and reduction to [6] and [9]; this is an external dependency on prior published results, some by the current authors, and it is not the degenerate x_d^2 estimate being proved, so relying on it is not circular. The optimality statement for the theta range is announced but deferred to future work; it is not used as an input to the main proofs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no result is defined in terms of the target conclusion, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported solely from a self-citation to force the conclusion. The unproved auxiliary estimate and the deferred optimality proof are completeness or rigor concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends mainly on structural assumptions about coefficients and on imported nondegenerate estimates. No empirical free parameters or invented entities appear. The constants rho0, gamma0, and lambda0 are existence parameters, not fitted values; they are chosen sufficiently close, small, or large depending on the data.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Coefficients satisfy uniform ellipticity and boundedness (1.1) and (1.2)-(1.3).
Standard nondegeneracy and coefficient bounds; without these the estimates fail or the weight spaces are not well defined.
domain assumption Leading coefficients have small partial BMO oscillations in the spatial variables as in Assumptions 2.2/2.11.
This is the coefficient class for which the nondegenerate Lp theory is available; the small parameter gamma0 is chosen in the proof.
domain assumption For the lambda=0 results, the ratios b_d/a_dd, \hat b_d/a_dd, and c/a_dd are constant and the frozen coefficients satisfy Assumptions 2.3/2.12.
This is a strong structural condition, needed to make the exponent range independent of x0 and to run the zeroth-order energy estimate.
domain assumption The Muckenhoupt weight omega lies in A_q with [omega]_{A_q} <= K0.
Used for mixed-norm time weights and the weighted Hardy-Littlewood maximal theorem.
domain assumption Quadratic equation (2.8) has two distinct real roots alpha < beta.
The admissible theta interval (alpha p, beta p) is defined by these roots; the paper notes this condition is necessary for its analysis (Remark 2.15).
standard math Nondegenerate H^1_{p,omega} estimates for equations with partially BMO coefficients and general a0,c0 hold as cited from [4,6,8,9].
Invoked in Lemma 3.6 and Remark 3.7; the proof only outlines the reduction, so the result is imported rather than derived.
standard math Weighted Hardy's inequality (Lemma 3.1) and Muckenhoupt weight properties (Proposition A.1) hold.
Background inequalities used in the zeroth-order estimate and the ink-spots lemma.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sobolev estimates for parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form with degenerate coefficients." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6ADLHZLT

@misc{pith2026241200779,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sobolev estimates for parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form with degenerate coefficients},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6ADLHZLT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00779}
}

abstract

We study a class of degenerate parabolic and elliptic equations in divergence form in the upper half space $\{x_d>0\}$. The leading coefficients are of the form $x_d^2a_{ij}$, where $a_{ij}$ are bounded, uniformly elliptic, and measurable in $(t,x_d)$ except $a_{dd}$, which is measurable in $t$ or $x_d$. Additionally, they have small bounded mean oscillations in the other spatial variables. We obtain the well-posedness and regularity of solutions in weighted mixed-norm Sobolev spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

[6]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Parabolic and elliptic systems in divergence form with variably partially BMO coefficients, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 43 (2011), no.3, 1075–1098

work page 2011
[9]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Time fractional parabolic equations with partially SMO coefficients, J. Differ. Equ. 377 (2023), 759–808

work page 2023
[1]

W. E. Boyce, R. C. DiPrima, D.B. Meade, Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems, John Wiley & Sons, 2021

2021
[2]

Daskalopoulos and R

P. Daskalopoulos and R. Hamilton, Regularity of the free boundary for the porous medium equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1998), no.4, 899–965

1998
[3]

Dong, Recent progress in theL p theory for elliptic and parabolic equations with discon- tinuous coefficients, Anal

H. Dong, Recent progress in theL p theory for elliptic and parabolic equations with discon- tinuous coefficients, Anal. Theory Appl. 36 (2020), no.2, 161–199

work page 2020
[4]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Higher order elliptic and parabolic systems with variably partially BMO coefficients in regular and irregular domains, J. Funct. Anal. 261 (2011), no.11, 3279–3327

work page 2011
[5]

H. Dong, D. Kim,L p solvability of divergence type parabolic and elliptic systems with par- tially BMO coefficients, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 40 (2011), 357–389

work page 2011
[7]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Elliptic and parabolic equations with measurable coefficients in weighted Sobolev spaces, Adv. Math. 274 (2015), 681–735

2015

Show all 43 references

[8]

H. Dong, D. Kim, OnL p-estimates for elliptic and parabolic equations withA p weights, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018) no.7, 5081–5130

2018
[10]

H. Dong, T. Phan, Weighted mixed-normL p-estimates for elliptic and parabolic equations in non-divergence form with singular coefficients, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 37 (2020), no.4, 1413– 1440

2020
[11]

H. Dong, T. Phan, Parabolic and elliptic equations with singular or degenerate coefficients: the Dirichlet problem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 374 (2021), 6611–6647

2021
[12]

H. Dong, T. Phan, On parabolic and elliptic equations with singular or degenerate coefficients, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 73 (2023) no.4, 1461-–1502

2023
[13]

H. Dong, T. Phan, Weighted mixed-normL p estimates for equations in non-divergence form with singular coefficients: the Dirichlet problem, J. Funct. Anal. 285 (2023), no.2, 109964

2023
[14]

H. Dong, T. Phan, H. Tran, Degenerate linear parabolic equations in divergence form on the upper half space, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), no.06, 4421–4451

2023
[15]

H. Dong, T. Phan, H. Tran, Nondivergence form degenerate linear parabolic equations on the upper half space, J. Funct. Anal. 286 (2024), no.9, 110374

2024
[16]

Paul M. N. Feehan and Camelia A. Pop, A Schauder approach to degenerate-parabolic partial differential equations with unbounded coefficients, J. Differ. Equ. 254 (2013), no.12, 4401– 4445

2013
[17]

Fornaro, G

S. Fornaro, G. Metafune, D. Pallara, J. Pr¨ uss,L p-theory for some elliptic and parabolic problems with first order degeneracy at the boundary. J. Math. Pures Appl. 87 (2007), no.4, 367–393. DEGENERATE LINEAR EQUATIONS 43

2007
[18]

Fornaro, G

S. Fornaro, G. Metafune, D. Pallara, Analytic semigroups generated inLp by elliptic operators with high order degeneracy at the boundary, Note Mat. 31 (2011), 103–115

2011
[19]

Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics Vol

L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics Vol. 249, Springer, New York, 2014

2014
[20]

Graham, J.M

C.R. Graham, J.M. Lee, Einstein metrics with prescribed conformal infinity on the ball, Adv. Math. 87(1991), 186–225

1991
[21]

Q. Han, J. Xie, Optimal Boundary Regularity for Uniformly Degenerate Elliptic Equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16418

arXiv
[22]

Hyt¨ onen, J

T. Hyt¨ onen, J. Van Neerven, M. Veraar, L. Weis, Analysis in Banach spaces. Vol. I. Mar- tingales and Littlewood-Paley theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematikund ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd S...

2016
[23]

Kim, Elliptic equations with nonzero boundary conditions in weighted Sobolev spaces

D. Kim, Elliptic equations with nonzero boundary conditions in weighted Sobolev spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 337 (2008), no.2, 1465–1479

2008
[24]

Kim, Sobolev space theory of parabolic equations degenerating on the boundary ofC 1 domains, Commun

K.H. Kim, Sobolev space theory of parabolic equations degenerating on the boundary ofC 1 domains, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 32 (2007), no.8, 1261–1280

2007
[25]

Kim,L p-Theory of Parabolic SPDE s Degenerating on the Boundary ofC 1 Domains, J

K.H. Kim,L p-Theory of Parabolic SPDE s Degenerating on the Boundary ofC 1 Domains, J. Theor. Probab. 21 (2008), 169–192

2008
[26]

Kim, N.V

K.H. Kim, N.V. Krylov, On the Sobolev space theory of parabolic and elliptic equations in C1 domains, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 36 (2004), no.2, 618–642

2004
[27]

K.H. Kim, K. Lee, A weightedL p-theory for parabolic PDEs with BMO coefficients onC 1- domains, J. Differ. Equ. 254 (2013), no.2, 368–407

2013
[28]

Koch, Non-Euclidean singular integrals and the porous medium equation, Habilitation Thesis, University of Heidelberg, 1999

H. Koch, Non-Euclidean singular integrals and the porous medium equation, Habilitation Thesis, University of Heidelberg, 1999

1999
[29]

Kozlov, A

V. Kozlov, A. Nazarov, The Dirichlet problem for non-divergence parabolic equations with discontinuous in time coefficients, Math. Nachr. 282 (2009), no.9, 1220–1241

2009
[30]

Krylov, AW n 2 -theory of the Dirichlet problem for SPDEs in general smooth domains, Probab

N.V. Krylov, AW n 2 -theory of the Dirichlet problem for SPDEs in general smooth domains, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 98 (1994), 389–421

1994
[31]

Krylov, Weighted Sobolev spaces and Laplace’s equation and the heat equations in a half space, Commun

N.V. Krylov, Weighted Sobolev spaces and Laplace’s equation and the heat equations in a half space, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 24 (1999), no.9-10, 1611–1653

1999
[32]

Krylov, Parabolic and elliptic equations with VMO coefficients, Commun

N.V. Krylov, Parabolic and elliptic equations with VMO coefficients, Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 32 (2007), no.3, 453–475

2007
[33]

Krylov, Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in Sobolev Spaces, Grad

N.V. Krylov, Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in Sobolev Spaces, Grad. Stud. Math., American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

2008
[34]

Krylov,, On parabolic equations in one space dimension, Comm

N.V. Krylov,, On parabolic equations in one space dimension, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 41 (2016), no.4, 644–664

2016
[35]

Krylov, S.V

N.V. Krylov, S.V. Lototsky, A Sobolev space theory of SPDE with constant coefficients on a half line, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 30 (1999), no.2, 298–325

1999
[36]

Krylov, S.V

N.V. Krylov, S.V. Lototsky, A Sobolev space theory of SPDEs with constant coefficients in a half space, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 31 (1999), no.1, 19–33

1999
[37]

Kufner, Weighted Sobolev Spaces, A Wiley–Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1985 (translated from the Czech)

A. Kufner, Weighted Sobolev Spaces, A Wiley–Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1985 (translated from the Czech)

1985
[38]

Magenes, J

E. Magenes, J. L. Lions, Probl` emes aux limites non homog` enes et applications, Vol.1, Dunod, Paris, 1968

1968
[39]

Metafune, L

G. Metafune, L. Negro, C. Spina,L p estimates for the Caffarelli-Silvestre extension operators, J. Differ. Equ. 316 (2022), 290–345

2022
[40]

Metafune, L

G. Metafune, L. Negro, C. Spina,L p estimates for a class of degenerate operators, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. -S, 17 (2024), 1766–1791

2024
[41]

Seo, Sobolev space theory for Poisson’s equation in non-smooth domains via superharmonic functions and Hardy’s inequality (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18865

J. Seo, Sobolev space theory for Poisson’s equation in non-smooth domains via superharmonic functions and Hardy’s inequality (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18865

2024
[42]

Shreve, Stochastic calculus for finance

S.E. Shreve, Stochastic calculus for finance. I, Springer Finance, Springer, New York, 2004

2004
[43]

Vespri, Analytic semigroups, degenerate elliptic operators and applications to nonlinear Cauchy problems, Ann

V. Vespri, Analytic semigroups, degenerate elliptic operators and applications to nonlinear Cauchy problems, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 155 (1989), no.1, 353–388

1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [6]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Parabolic and elliptic systems in divergence form with variably partially BMO coefficients, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 43 (2011), no.3, 1075–1098

work page 2011

[2] [9]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Time fractional parabolic equations with partially SMO coefficients, J. Differ. Equ. 377 (2023), 759–808

work page 2023

[3] [1]

W. E. Boyce, R. C. DiPrima, D.B. Meade, Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems, John Wiley & Sons, 2021

2021

[4] [2]

Daskalopoulos and R

P. Daskalopoulos and R. Hamilton, Regularity of the free boundary for the porous medium equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1998), no.4, 899–965

1998

[5] [3]

Dong, Recent progress in theL p theory for elliptic and parabolic equations with discon- tinuous coefficients, Anal

H. Dong, Recent progress in theL p theory for elliptic and parabolic equations with discon- tinuous coefficients, Anal. Theory Appl. 36 (2020), no.2, 161–199

work page 2020

[6] [4]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Higher order elliptic and parabolic systems with variably partially BMO coefficients in regular and irregular domains, J. Funct. Anal. 261 (2011), no.11, 3279–3327

work page 2011

[7] [5]

H. Dong, D. Kim,L p solvability of divergence type parabolic and elliptic systems with par- tially BMO coefficients, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 40 (2011), 357–389

work page 2011

[8] [7]

H. Dong, D. Kim, Elliptic and parabolic equations with measurable coefficients in weighted Sobolev spaces, Adv. Math. 274 (2015), 681–735

2015