Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Tracing Hierarchical Star Formation out to Kiloparsec Scales in Nearby Spiral Galaxies with UVIT

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using full-galaxy ultraviolet imaging, this paper shows that young star-forming clumps in four nearby spirals are hierarchically clustered only up to a scale of 0.5–3.1 kpc, after which their distribution is nearly random, and that this…

desk verdict A solid measurement paper that settles an open question from Menon et al. (2021) about correlation lengths in grand-design spirals; the completeness caveat is real but addressable, so it deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00872 v2 pith:D7AC32CS submitted 2024-12-01 astro-ph.GA

Gairola Shashank , Smitha Subramanian , Sreedevi M. , Shyam H Menon , Chayan Mondal , Sriram Krishna , Mousumi Das , Annapurni Subramaniam This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords hierarchicalstarformationtwo-pointcorrelationfunctionlengthfractaldimensionstar-formingclumpsspiralgalaxiesUVITultravioletimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tests whether the scale-free hierarchical star formation seen inside molecular clouds extends to whole galaxies. Using UVIT far- and near-ultraviolet images that cover four nearby spiral galaxies completely, the authors identify young star-forming clumps, estimate their ages, and measure their spatial clustering with the two-point correlation function. They find that the clumps follow a fractal-like power-law distribution only up to a correlation length $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ between 0.5 and 3.1 kpc, and that beyond this scale the clump distribution is essentially random. The low-mass flocculent galaxy NGC 7793 has a correlation length about five times smaller than the three grand-design spirals, and the hierarchical pattern dissolves within 10–50 Myr as clumps age. If correct, these results mean the star formation hierarchy is finite and environment-dependent rather than a universal, scale-free structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-point correlation function (TPCF) computed with the Landy–Szalay estimator on de-projected positions of star-forming clumps, using a customised random footprint that masks the galaxy disc and spiral-arm contributions. The observed TPCF is fitted with three models: a piecewise power law (PW), a power law with exponential falloff (PF), and a hybrid (PWF), from which the correlation length $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$, the fractal dimension $D_2 = 2 + \alpha_1$, the dissipation timescale, and the exponential falloff scale $r_c$ are extracted. Supporting machinery includes astrodendro for identifying clumps in FUV images and Starburst99 synthetic colour–magnitude diagrams for assigning ages and separating young from old clumps.

What would settle it

Take deeper UV or HST-resolution observations of NGC 1566 and NGC 5194 reaching 10 Myr old clumps at $10^4\ M_\odot$ (the completeness analysis suggests current limits of 7 and 6 Myr), redetect the clumps, and recompute the TPCF; if the power-law correlation continues beyond the quoted 3.1 and 2.0 kpc breaks, or if the break moves substantially, the claim of a finite, environment-dependent $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that in all four galaxies the young (<10 Myr) star-forming clumps are hierarchically arranged only below a characteristic scale $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$, which ranges from roughly 460 pc to 3.1 kpc, and that above this scale their distribution is nearly Poissonian. This is the first measurement of a definite correlation length for NGC 1566 and NGC 5194, where earlier partial-coverage work could only place lower limits, and it shows that the hierarchy does not extend to the full galaxy size. The authors also measure a projected fractal dimension $D_2$ between 1.05 and 1.50 and find that the hierarchical pattern dissipates on timescales of 10, 20, 50, and 10 Myr for NGC 1566, NGC 5457, NGC 5194, and NGC 7793, respectively. Together with the strong correlation between $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ and stellar mass, these results lead the authors to conclude that the global hierarchical properties of star formation are not universal but depend on galaxy mass, morphology, pressure, and environment.

Load-bearing premise

The central result assumes that the catalogue of young (<10 Myr) star-forming clumps is complete and correctly age-classified, so that faint young clumps and older clumps with large age errors are not shifting the correlation function; if 8–10 Myr clumps are missed or 20–100 Myr clumps are misclassified as young, the derived $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ and fractal dimension would be biased and the non-universality conclusion weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If every galaxy has a finite $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$, then galaxy-wide, scale-free hierarchical star formation is ruled out; models must include a physical cutoff near the kiloparsec scale.
  • Full-disk coverage changes the inferred hierarchy: NGC 5457 shows $l_{\mathrm{corr}} \sim 1.9$ kpc globally versus $\sim450$ pc from a partial field, so partial-coverage estimates should be treated as local, not global.
  • The wide range of $D_2$ (1.05–1.50) and dissipation timescales (10–50 Myr) indicates that star formation, unlike molecular clouds, does not have a universal fractal dimension.
  • The strong correlation of $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ with stellar mass in this sample suggests that galaxy potential and large-scale environment set the maximum size of coherent star-forming structures, while the Toomre length alone is not sufficient to explain it.
  • The hierarchical signature fades within 10–50 Myr, consistent with star-forming clumps migrating away from their birth clouds and losing their natal spatial correlation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ is set by feedback-generated turbulence, as kiloparsec-scale simulations suggest, then this length could serve as an observational proxy for the driving scale of interstellar turbulence, testable by comparing with molecular-cloud velocity dispersion maps in the same galaxies.
  • The quadrant analysis for NGC 5457 implies that any survey with partial spatial coverage mixes local and global hierarchy; re-analysing existing HST-based samples with synthetic partial-coverage masks would quantify this bias.
  • A direct extension is to measure $l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ across a wider range of shear, gas fraction, and arm class; if the mass–$l_{\mathrm{corr}}$ relation holds, dwarf and flocculent galaxies should systematically show sub-kiloparsec correlation lengths.
  • The observed 10–50 Myr dissipation predicts an age–separation relation for young clumps; very deep multi-epoch UV or HST imaging of nearby spirals could test whether the migration speed matches the turbulence-driven $\Delta t \propto R^{0.5}$ expectation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies hierarchical star formation in four nearby spiral galaxies (NGC 1566, NGC 5194, NGC 5457, NGC 7793) using UVIT FUV/NUV imaging. The authors identify star-forming clumps with astrodendro, assign ages with Starburst99 synthetic colours, and compute the two-point correlation function (TPCF) using a custom random footprint. They fit the TPCF with piecewise power-law, power-law-with-exponential-fall-off, or hybrid models to derive the maximum hierarchical scale l_corr, the projected fractal dimension D2, and a hierarchy dissipation timescale. The central claim is that young (<10 Myr) star-forming clumps are hierarchically distributed only up to l_corr, which ranges from about 0.5 to 3.1 kpc and is much smaller than the host galaxy; the hierarchy dissolves within 10-50 Myr. The authors argue that these properties are not universal and depend on host-galaxy environment.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides the first full-galaxy measurements of the hierarchical star-formation scale in NGC 1566, NGC 5194, and NGC 5457, directly improving on the partial-coverage HST/LEGUS study of Menon et al. (2021). The use of UVIT's large field of view is a genuine methodological advance, and the comparison with previous HST-based values, including the benchmark case of NGC 7793, gives the results independent support. The empirical TPCF figures (Fig. 5) visually show a break between a steep small-scale power law and a flat large-scale tail, and the reported l_corr values carry fit uncertainties. The paper also includes a completeness analysis and a robustness check with modified age cuts. These strengths make the central empirical pattern credible, subject to the completeness and age-classification concerns detailed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.4 and Section 7.4] The completeness analysis in Section 4.4 reports limiting ages of approximately 7, 6, and 8 Myr for NGC 1566, NGC 5194, and NGC 5457, respectively, all below the 10 Myr cut used to define the young SFC population whose TPCF yields l_corr and D2. A non-negligible part of the nominal young population (8-10 Myr) may therefore be missing, and if these unresolved fainter SFCs are spatially distributed differently from the detected ones, the observed break at l_corr could be a selection artifact. The robustness test in Section 6.4 moves the age cut upward to 20 and 50 Myr, which does not probe the missing 8-10 Myr population, and Section 7.4 asserts that incompleteness has 'minimal impact' without a quantitative correction or an explicit test. This issue is load-bearing for the central claim of finite, non-universal l_corr values, and needs to be addressed with either a completeness correction to the TPCF or an injection/recovery test that shows the missing population has the same clustering properties.
  2. [Section 6.4 and Table 4] The hierarchy dissipation timescale for NGC 1566 and NGC 7793 is listed as 10 Myr, but this value is not independently measured; it is simply the assumed young/old age cut at which the old SFC TPCF already has a slope shallower than the adopted -0.2 threshold. The definition of the dissipation timescale as the first age-cut at which the modified-old population becomes non-hierarchical naturally returns 10 Myr for these two galaxies by construction. The abstract and Section 8 state that the hierarchy 'dissipates within 10-50 Myr', which overstates what is measured for NGC 1566 and NGC 7793. These two galaxies should be reported as having a dissipation timescale of at most 10 Myr, or less, with the corresponding caveat in the summary claims.
  3. [Section 4.3 and Section 6.4] The age errors reported in Section 4.3 are large for the older SFCs: median errors of 23-45 Myr for SFCs with ages between 20 and 100 Myr. Given these uncertainties, the 10 Myr boundary between young and old populations is fuzzy, and some genuinely old SFCs may be scattered into the young sample. This is particularly relevant for NGC 5194 and NGC 5457, where the 'old' SFC TPCF retains a significant hierarchical component (model PWF; slopes -0.34 and -0.41, Figure 5). The authors attribute this to slow dissipation, but it could also arise from young SFCs being misclassified as old and vice versa. Their supporting argument that the dissipation timescales match star-cluster dissociation timescales covers only NGC 5194 and NGC 7793, not NGC 5457. A quantitative assessment of how the quoted age uncertainties propagate into the TPCF of the young sample, for example by Monte Carlo resampling of SFC ages, would strengthen the age-evolution claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B] The quadrant analysis of NGC 5457 uses SFCs with a 0.15 magnitude error cut, whereas the main analysis (Section 4.2) uses a 0.10 cut for this galaxy. The paper should state explicitly whether the quadrant l_corr values and the 'all young SFCs combined' value of ~2.7 kpc are directly comparable to the global 0.10-cut value of 1.9 kpc, and how changing the error cut affects the derived quantities.
  2. [Section 4.6] The custom random footprint is generated by Gaussian-smoothing the SFC density map with a kernel of 2 pixels in a 180x180 pixel image. The choice of kernel width is not justified or tested; since the footprint determines the random pair counts, the sensitivity of l_corr and D2 to this smoothing scale should be checked, at least for one galaxy.
  3. [Figure 5 and Figure A.1] The shaded regions and the 'Random distribution' curve in the TPCF panels are not defined in the captions; the reader must infer from the text that the grey region marks TPCF < 1 and the yellow region marks the edge-effect limit. Please define these in the captions for clarity.
  4. [Section 4.4] The completeness limit for NGC 7793 is reported as 50 Myr, which is much older than for the other galaxies. A brief explanation of why the deepest-exposure galaxy also has the oldest completeness limit (e.g., due to the peak of the magnitude histogram falling at a brighter FUV magnitude) would help the reader interpret the comparison.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Dissipation timescale for two galaxies restates the 10 Myr age cut; central l_corr analysis is self-contained.

  1. self definitional [Section 6.4 (hierarchy dissipation timescale); age-cut definition in Section 4.3; Table 4 column 4]
    "We implemented the same age-cut of 10 Myr for our SFCs. ... As is evident by the shallower than −0.2 slope of the old SFC TPCF plots in NGC 1566 and NGC 7793 in Figure 5 as well as the TPCF plots for modified-old SFCs in NGC 5194 and NGC 5457 in Figure 6, we infer that the hierarchy dissipation timescales for NGC 1566, NGC 5194, NGC 5457, and NGC 7793 are approximately 10, 50, 20, and 10 Myr, respectively."

    For NGC 1566 and NGC 7793 the '10 Myr' dissipation timescale is not obtained from the iterative age-cut search described in Section 6.4; that search was performed for NGC 5194 and NGC 5457 only. Instead, the 10 Myr value is inferred from the fact that the 'old' population, defined in Section 4.3 as SFCs older than 10 Myr, already has a shallow TPCF. The numerical value therefore coincides with the analyst-imposed young/old boundary by construction: had a different a priori cut been chosen, the reported dissipation timescale for these galaxies would have changed without any new measurement. This does not affect l_corr or D2, which are fitted directly to the young SFC TPCF, but it makes the '10–50 Myr' dissipation range in the abstract partly self-referential for half of the sample.

full rationale

The core derivation chain is self-contained: SFCs are detected in UVIT FUV images with Astrodendro, ages are assigned from Starburst99 synthetic CMDs, and the two-point correlation function is computed against a customised random distribution. l_corr and D2 are free parameters of the piecewise power-law model fitted to the observed young-SFC TPCF; they are not taken from an input that already contains them. The M21 connection is not load-bearing: the paper uses M21 for galaxy selection, for quoted lower limits, and for some Toomre-length inputs, but the new l_corr and D2 values are independent measurements from full-coverage UVIT data, and the M21 numbers are used for comparison rather than as premises in the fit. The one genuine self-referential element is the dissipation timescale reported as 10 Myr for NGC 1566 and NGC 7793, which reduces to the 10 Myr young/old age cut imposed in Section 4.3; for NGC 5194 and NGC 5457 the timescales (50 and 20 Myr) come from an iterative fit and are not circular. Separately, Section 4.4 states completeness limits of 7, 6, 8, and 50 Myr for NGC 1566, NGC 5194, NGC 5457, and NGC 7793, while Section 7.4 asserts that 'most of our young (<10 Myr) SFC population' is 'relatively complete'; for three galaxies the completeness ages are below 10 Myr, so that assertion is not quantitatively supported. This is a completeness/selection concern affecting the robustness of the young-SFC sample, but it is not a circularity of the derivation. Overall, the central claims about finite l_corr and non-universality rest on an independent fit, and the circular element is confined to a secondary timescale, so the paper has only minor circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It uses fitted TPCF parameters (l_corr, D2, rc) and hand-chosen thresholds (age cut, slope cut, kernel size, error cuts) that the central claims depend on. The main domain assumptions are the thin-disc deprojection, SB99 age-dating, the completeness of the young SFC sample, and the unbiasedness of the custom random footprint. None of these are independently verified within the paper beyond internal consistency checks.

free parameters (8)
  • l_corr (NGC 1566, NGC 5194, NGC 5457, NGC 7793) = 3.1 +/- 0.7 kpc; 2.0 +/- 0.2 kpc; 1.9 +/- 0.1 kpc; 0.46 +/- 0.05 kpc
    Break scale fitted from the piecewise power-law model to the young SFC TPCF. This is the central quantity of the paper and is fitted to data, not derived.
  • D2 fractal dimension (four values) = 1.34, 1.43, 1.05, 1.12
    Derived from the fitted first power-law slope alpha1 as D2 = 2 + alpha1. Used to support the non-universality claim.
  • rc exponential fall-off scale (four values) = 12.1, 8.3, 16.4, 5.6 kpc
    Exponential fall-off scale fitted to the TPCF of the total SFC population in the PF or PWF models.
  • Young/old age cut = 10 Myr
    Adopted from M21 to separate young and old SFCs. For NGC 1566 and NGC 7793 the dissipation timescale is this cut itself, so the central dissipation claim depends on this choice.
  • Dissipation slope threshold = -0.2
    Hand-chosen slope cut in Section 6.4 below which a TPCF is considered non-hierarchical. Determines the reported dissipation timescales.
  • Gaussian kernel sigma for custom footprint = 2 pixels
    Chosen in Section 4.6 for smoothing the SFC density map to define the random footprint. No sensitivity test is provided.
  • First TPCF bin selection = first bin after monotonic fall starts, ~3-4x resolution
    Data-dependent exclusion of small-scale TPCF points before fitting, which can affect the fitted slopes and l_corr.
  • Magnitude error cuts = 0.20 (NGC 1566, NGC 5194); 0.10 (NGC 5457, NGC 7793)
    Different cuts applied per galaxy based on data quality, affecting the SFC samples and completeness across the sample.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Galaxies are treated as thin circular discs for deprojection.
    Equations 1 and 2 in Section 4.5 deproject SFC positions using a single inclination angle. Real discs have finite thickness and warps, which could bias the derived spatial separations.
  • domain assumption Starburst99 single-burst populations with the chosen IMF, metallicity, and Geneva tracks accurately convert FUV-NUV colours into ages.
    Section 4.3 uses SB99 to interpolate ages from colours. The IMF sampling assumption is only approximately true for clumps more massive than 10^3 solar masses, and age errors can be large.
  • domain assumption The three TPCF models (PW, PF, PWF) span the plausible distributions, and minimum reduced chi2 selects the correct model.
    Section 5 defines the models and Section 6.1 selects by reduced chi2. No nested-model significance test is used, so a break may be fitted even when a single power law is statistically sufficient.
  • ad hoc to paper The custom random distribution, built by Gaussian-smoothing the SFC density map and contouring it, gives an unbiased estimate of the random pair counts.
    Section 4.6 and Appendix A claim this removes disc and spiral-arm contributions, but the smoothing scale, contour level, and the use of the data to define the footprint could remove real large-scale clustering signal.
  • standard math The Landy-Szalay estimator is unbiased for this sample size and footprint.
    Section 4.6 uses the Landy-Szalay TPCF estimator. This is a standard, well-tested estimator for point processes.
  • domain assumption Extinction corrections adopted from literature (Cardelli law and published AV values) are accurate.
    Section 4.2 adopts extinction values from prior SED-fitting papers. Errors in these values propagate into the FUV-NUV colours and hence into SFC ages and the young/old classification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tracing Hierarchical Star Formation out to Kiloparsec Scales in Nearby Spiral Galaxies with UVIT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D7AC32CS

@misc{pith2026241200872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tracing Hierarchical Star Formation out to Kiloparsec Scales in Nearby Spiral Galaxies with UVIT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D7AC32CS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00872}
}
abstract

Molecular clouds fragment under the action of supersonic turbulence & gravity which results in a scale-free hierarchical distribution of star formation (SF) within galaxies. Recent studies suggest that the hierarchical distribution of SF in nearby galaxies shows a dependence on host galaxy properties. In this context, we study the nature of hierarchical SF from a few tens of pc up to several kpc in 4 nearby spiral galaxies NGC1566, NGC5194, NGC5457 & NGC7793, by leveraging the large FoV & high resolution FUV+NUV observations from the UltraViolet Imaging Telescope (UVIT). Using the two-point correlation function, we infer that the young star-forming clumps (SFCs) in the galaxies are arranged in a fractal-like hierarchical distribution, but only up to a maximum scale ($l_{corr}$) & it ranges from 0.5 kpc to 3.1 kpc. The flocculent spiral NGC7793 has $\sim$5 times smaller $l_{corr}$ than the 3 grand design spirals, possibly due to its lower mass, low pressure environment & lack of strong spiral arms. $l_{corr}$ being much smaller than the galaxy size suggests that the SF hierarchy does not extend to the full galaxy size & it is likely an effect set by multiple physical mechanisms in the galaxy. The hierarchical distribution of SFCs dissipates within 10 to 50 Myr, signifying their migration away from their birthplaces over time. Our results suggest that the global hierarchical properties of SF in galaxies are not universal & significant variations exist in the local & global hierarchy parameters of a galaxy. This study also demonstrates the capabilities of UVIT in characterizing the SF hierarchy in nearby galaxies. In the future, a bigger sample can be employed to further understand the role of large-scale galaxy properties (morphology, environment) & physical processes (feedback, turbulence, shear & ISM conditions) on determining the non-universal hierarchical properties of SF in galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00872 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. UVIT FUV images of the four galaxies in our sample. The red circles represent the locations and sizes of the SFCs in the galaxies that were detected using astrodendro and the black polygons represent part of the galaxy area that was previously observed using the HST and used in M21. Due to its large FoV, UVIT is able to cover the entire galaxy and it provides an advantage over an instrument like the HST. galaxy envi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Synthetic colour-magnitude diagram from Starburst99 and the extinction-corrected SFCs (red dots) identified in NGC 7793. The num￾bers annotated above the 106𝑀⊙ SFC track represents the ages of the synthetic stellar population in Myr. The FUV−NUV colour can be seen getting progressively redder with age in this figure. still associated with their parent molecular clouds from the star clusters no longer associated with… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FUV magnitude histogram of the SFCs detected in the FUV images of NGC 7793 which have 4ks, 6ks, and 8ks exposure times. It is evident in this figure that with higher exposure times, we can detect more faint SFCs. The peak of the histogram is considered as the approximate completeness limit in our analysis. discussed in Section 4.2) and use them as the completeness limit of the detected SFCs in each galaxy. The FUV m… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic describing how the customised footprint for TPCF computation is generated using the positions of young SFCs in NGC 5457. The background image over which the contours are drawn is a 180×180 pixel number density map of the SFC distribution. The white dots repre…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two-point correlation function (TPCF) as a function of spatial separation scale for the sample galaxies is shown in this figure for young (< 10 Myr), old (> 10 Myr) and all (young + old) SFCs. The mathematical models describing the observed TPCF plots (Section 5) for a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: TPCF for NGC 5194 and NGC 5457 with a modified age-cut of 50 Myr and 20 Myr, respectively. We found that this new young population of SFCs shows hierarchical behaviour but the older population does not, as evidenced by the quite shallow slope of their TPCF. This infers…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Trends of the estimated correlation length with the stellar mass (Left) and Toomre length (Right) of the sample galaxies. The Pearson correlation analysis indicates a strong positive correlation between the correlation length and the stellar mass of the galaxies, where…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST Reveals a Galaxy-Wide Association of Red Supergiants with OB Stars in NGC 5584

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In NGC 5584, 82% of UV-selected star-forming complexes coincide with red supergiant overdensities, with strong UV to near-infrared luminosity correlations and a characteristic age near 15 Myr.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  5. [5]

    Agrawal , P. C. 2006, Advances in Space Research, 38, 2989

    2006

  6. [6]

    2024, , 530, 2199

    Amrutha , S., Das , M., & Yadav , J. 2024, , 530, 2199

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    J., & Scott , P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, , 47, 481

    2009

  8. [8]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    P., Harnett , J

    Bajaja , E., Wielebinski , R., Reuter , H. P., Harnett , J. I., & Hummel , E. 1995, , 114, 147

    1995

  2. [10]

    Bibby , J. L. & Crowther , P. A. 2010, , 405, 2737

    2010

  3. [11]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 1.12.0

    Bradley, L., Sip o cz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 1.12.0

    2024

  4. [12]

    2021, , 133, 102001

    Burkhart , B. 2021, , 133, 102001

    2021

  5. [13]

    C., Sabbi , E., et al

    Calzetti , D., Lee , J. C., Sabbi , E., et al. 2015, , 149, 51

    2015

  6. [14]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  7. [15]

    P., Bianchi , S., et al

    Casasola , V., Cassar \`a , L. P., Bianchi , S., et al. 2017, , 605, A18

    2017

  8. [16]

    Chevance , M., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Hygate , A. P. S., et al. 2020, , 493, 2872

    2020

  9. [17]

    2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 85

    Das , M., Yadav , J., Patra , N., et al. 2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 85

    2021

  10. [18]

    de Blok , W. J. G., Walter , F., Brinks , E., et al. 2008, , 136, 2648

    2008

  11. [19]

    & de la Fuente Marcos , C

    de la Fuente Marcos , R. & de la Fuente Marcos , C. 2009, , 700, 436

    2009

  12. [20]

    1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (Springer Publishing)

    de Vaucouleurs , G., de Vaucouleurs , A., Corwin , Herold G., J., et al. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (Springer Publishing)

    1991

  13. [21]

    S., Tandon , S

    Devaraj , A., Joseph , P., Stalin , C. S., Tandon , S. N., & Ghosh , S. K. 2023, , 946, 65

    2023

  14. [22]

    2019, , 487, 2797

    Elagali , A., Staveley-Smith , L., Rhee , J., et al. 2019, , 487, 2797

    2019

  15. [23]

    Elmegreen , B. G. 1993, , 419, L29

    1993

  16. [24]

    G., Elmegreen , D

    Elmegreen , B. G., Elmegreen , D. M., Chandar , R., Whitmore , B., & Regan , M. 2006, , 644, 879

    2006

  17. [25]

    Elmegreen , B. G. & Falgarone , E. 1996, , 471, 816

    1996

  18. [26]

    Elmegreen , B. G. & Scalo , J. 2004, , 42, 211

    2004

  19. [27]

    M., Elmegreen , B

    Elmegreen , D. M., Elmegreen , B. G., Adamo , A., et al. 2014, , 787, L15

    2014

  20. [28]

    & Larson , R

    Escala , A. & Larson , R. B. 2008, , 685, L31

    2008

  21. [29]

    2013, , 436, 1245

    Federrath , C. 2013, , 436, 1245

    2013

  22. [30]

    2018 a , Physics Today, 71, 38

    Federrath , C. 2018 a , Physics Today, 71, 38

    2018

  23. [31]

    2018 b , Physics Today, 71, 38

    Federrath , C. 2018 b , Physics Today, 71, 38

    2018

  24. [32]

    S., Iapichino , L., & Beattie , J

    Federrath , C., Klessen , R. S., Iapichino , L., & Beattie , J. R. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 365

    2021

  25. [33]

    S., & Schmidt , W

    Federrath , C., Klessen , R. S., & Schmidt , W. 2009, , 692, 364

    2009

  26. [34]

    K., Johnson , K

    Finn , M. K., Johnson , K. E., Indebetouw , R., et al. 2024, , 964, 13

    2024

  27. [35]

    A., Elmegreen , B

    Gouliermis , D. A., Elmegreen , B. G., Elmegreen , D. M., et al. 2017, , 468, 509

    2017

  28. [36]

    2019, , 483, 4707

    Grasha , K., Calzetti , D., Adamo , A., et al. 2019, , 483, 4707

    2019

  29. [37]

    2015, , 815, 93

    Grasha , K., Calzetti , D., Adamo , A., et al. 2015, , 815, 93

    2015

  30. [38]

    2017 a , , 840, 113

    Grasha , K., Calzetti , D., Adamo , A., et al. 2017 a , , 840, 113

    2017

  31. [39]

    2018, , 481, 1016

    Grasha , K., Calzetti , D., Bittle , L., et al. 2018, , 481, 1016

    2018

  32. [40]

    G., Calzetti , D., et al

    Grasha , K., Elmegreen , B. G., Calzetti , D., et al. 2017 b , , 842, 25

    2017

  33. [41]

    B., Renaud , F., & Read , J

    Grisdale , K., Agertz , O., Romeo , A. B., Renaud , F., & Read , J. I. 2017, , 466, 1093

    2017

  34. [42]

    & Weliachew , L

    Gu \'e lin , M. & Weliachew , L. 1970, , 7, 141

    1970

  35. [43]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357–362

    2020

  36. [44]

    K., & Subramanian , S

    Hota , S., Subramaniam , A., Nayak , P. K., & Subramanian , S. 2024, , 168, 255

    2024

  37. [45]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  38. [46]

    P., Tacconi , L

    Israel , F. P., Tacconi , L. J., & Baas , F. 1995, , 295, 599

    1995

  39. [47]

    2009, , 184, 1

    Kawamura , A., Mizuno , Y., Minamidani , T., et al. 2009, , 184, 1

    2009

  40. [48]

    1998, , 498, 541

    Kennicutt , Robert C., J. 1998, , 498, 541

    1998

  41. [49]

    Kennicutt , R. C. & Evans , N. J. 2012, , 50, 531

    2012

  42. [50]

    K., Hutchings , J., et al

    Kumar , A., Ghosh , S. K., Hutchings , J., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8443, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. T. Takahashi , S. S. Murray , & J.-W. A. den Herder , 84431N

    2012

  43. [51]

    Lada , C. J. & Lada , E. A. 2003, , 41, 57

    2003

  44. [52]

    Landy, S. D. & Szalay, A. S. 1993, The Astrophysical Journal, 412, 64

    1993

  45. [53]

    Larson , R. B. 1981, , 194, 809

    1981

  46. [54]

    A., Postma , J., Chen , Y., & Buick , M

    Leahy , D. A., Postma , J., Chen , Y., & Buick , M. 2020, , 247, 47

    2020

  47. [55]

    D., et al

    Leitherer , C., Schaerer , D., Goldader , J. D., et al. 1999, , 123, 3

    1999

  48. [56]

    T., Perez , G., Calzetti , D., et al

    Linden , S. T., Perez , G., Calzetti , D., et al. 2022, , 935, 166

    2022

  49. [57]

    & Klessen , R

    Mac Low , M.-M. & Klessen , R. S. 2004, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 125

    2004

  50. [58]

    Mandelbrot , B. B. 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd)

    1982

  51. [59]

    E., Hughes , A., Dobbs , C

    Meidt , S. E., Hughes , A., Dobbs , C. L., et al. 2015, , 806, 72

    2015

  52. [60]

    H., Federrath , C., & Kuiper , R

    Menon , S. H., Federrath , C., & Kuiper , R. 2020, , 493, 4643

    2020

  53. [61]

    H., Grasha , K., Elmegreen , B

    Menon , S. H., Grasha , K., Elmegreen , B. G., et al. 2021, , 507, 5542

    2021

  54. [62]

    2018, , 156, 109

    Mondal , C., Subramaniam , A., & George , K. 2018, , 156, 109

    2018

  55. [63]

    2021, , 909, 203

    Mondal , C., Subramaniam , A., George , K., et al. 2021, , 909, 203

    2021

  56. [64]

    & Kamaya , H

    Nomura , H. & Kamaya , H. 2001, , 121, 1024

    2001

  57. [65]

    2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

    Padoan , P., Federrath , C., Chabrier , G., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 77

    2014

  58. [66]

    2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  59. [67]

    Postma , J. E. & Leahy , D. 2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 30

    2021

  60. [68]

    J., Baume , G., & Feinstein , C

    Rodr \' guez , M. J., Baume , G., & Feinstein , C. 2020, , 644, A101

    2020

  61. [69]

    W., Pineda , J

    Rosolowsky , E. W., Pineda , J. E., Kauffmann , J., & Goodman , A. A. 2008, , 679, 1338

    2008

  62. [70]

    J., & Crone Odekon , M

    S \'a nchez , N., A \ n ez , N., Alfaro , E. J., & Crone Odekon , M. 2010, , 720, 541

    2010

  63. [71]

    & Alfaro , E

    S \'a nchez , N. & Alfaro , E. J. 2008, , 178, 1

    2008

  64. [72]

    Schlafly , E. F. & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103

    2011

  65. [73]

    & Elmegreen , B

    Shadmehri , M. & Elmegreen , B. G. 2011, , 410, 788

    2011

  66. [74]

    P., Tandon , S

    Singh , K. P., Tandon , S. N., Agrawal , P. C., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9144, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. T. Takahashi , J.-W. A. den Herder , & M. Bautz , 91441S

    2014

  67. [75]

    L., et al

    Sun , N.-C., de Grijs , R., Cioni , M.-R. L., et al. 2018, , 858, 31

    2018

  68. [76]

    2017, , 835, 171

    Sun , N.-C., de Grijs , R., Subramanian , S., et al. 2017, , 835, 171

    2017

  69. [77]

    N., Postma , J., Joseph , P., et al

    Tandon , S. N., Postma , J., Joseph , P., et al. 2020, , 159, 158

    2020

  70. [78]

    1964, , 139, 1217

    Toomre , A. 1964, , 139, 1217

    1964

  71. [79]

    A., Dale , D

    Turner , J. A., Dale , D. A., Lilly , J., et al. 2022, , 516, 4612

    2022

  72. [80]

    D., Davidge , T

    Van Dyk , S. D., Davidge , T. J., Elias-Rosa , N., et al. 2012, , 143, 19

    2012

  73. [81]

    & Drake, F

    Van Rossum, G. & Drake, F. L. 2009, Python 3 Reference Manual (Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace)

    2009

  74. [82]

    J., Ivezic , Z., & Gray , A

    VanderPlas , J., Connolly , A. J., Ivezic , Z., & Gray , A. 2012, in Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU, 47--54

    2012

  75. [83]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  76. [84]

    N., et al

    Yadav , J., Das , M., Patra , N. N., et al. 2021, , 914, 54

    2021

  77. [85]

    M., & Whitmore , B

    Zhang , Q., Fall , S. M., & Whitmore , B. C. 2001, , 561, 727

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.