Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Representation stability in the (co)homology of vertical configuration spaces

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For each degree d, the (co)homology of vertical configuration spaces is representation stable as S_k ≀ S_n-representations, with stable range n ≥ ⌈4d/(q−1)⌉.

desk verdict Solid new proof of representation stability for vertical configuration spaces, with real quantitative improvements; the main gap is that the homotopy FI^♯-space structure (Theorem 7.22) is outsourced to a citation and needs to be written out before the paper is complete. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01128 v2 pith:PUSMGASU submitted 2024-12-02 math.AT math.CO

David Baron , Urshita Pal , Chenglu Wang , Jennifer C. H. Wilson , Chunye Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.ATmath.CO MSC 55R8020C3005E10
keywords representationstabilityverticalconfigurationspacesFI_G-moduleswreathproductshomologicalcharacterpolynomialscohomology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies vertical configuration spaces: configurations of n labelled clusters, each containing k points that coincide in their first p coordinates, in $R^{{p+q}}$. It proves that for fixed k and q ≥ 2, the degree-d (co)homology groups, with their natural S_k ≀ S_n actions, are representation stable in a strong sense: each group is a fixed finite direct sum of induced representations built from spaces with at most floor(2d/(q−1)) clusters. Over Q this means the decomposition into irreducible representations stabilizes for n ≥ ceil(4d/(q−1)), and the characters are given by one polynomial, independent of n, in the coloured cycle-counting functions. Passing through coinvariants also gives rational homological stability for the unordered spaces, with stabilization maps injective in every degree and isomorphisms for n ≥ floor(2d/(q−1)), improving the previous stable range.

What carries the argument

The central object is the category FI_{S_k}^♯, an enlargement of FI_{S_k} whose morphisms may also forget clusters by sending them to a basepoint; an FI_{S_k}^♯-module is a functor from this category to R-modules, packaging the whole family of S_k ≀ S_n-representations into one algebraic object. The paper builds a homotopy FI_{S_k}^♯-space structure on the vertical configuration spaces by combining the precomposition action (forgetting clusters) with stabilization maps that insert a new cluster far away; the condition q ≥ 2 guarantees that permuting labels inside the new cluster changes the map only up to homotopy. On the cohomology of a fixed degree d, this structure yields an FI_{S_k}^♯-module, and the Bianchi–Kranhold ray-partition basis shows its rank grows polynomially in n with degree at most floor(2d/(q−1)). The structure theorem for FI_G^♯-modules then forces the induced-representation decomposition and the character polynomial.

What would settle it

Compare the two composites $rV^{2}$_2($R^{{1,2}}$) → $rV^{2}$_3($R^{{1,2}}$) → $rV^{2}$_2($R^{{1,2}}$) given by forgetting the newly added cluster, versus adding another far-away cluster and then forgetting one of the far-away clusters. If these two maps are not homotopic, the compatibility required for the homotopy FI_{S_k}^♯-space structure, and hence for the main stability theorem, fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For each p ≥ 0, q ≥ 2, k ≥ 1, and degree d, the sequences (H^d(rV^k_n($R^{{p,q}}$); R))_n and (H_d(rV^k_n($R^{{p,q}}$); R))_n are FI_{S_k}^♯-modules finitely generated in degree at most floor(2d/(q−1)). The structure theorem for such modules gives the explicit form H^d(...; R) ≅ ⊕_{i=0}^{⌊2d/(q−1)⌋} Ind_{S_k≀S_i × S_k≀S_{n−i}}^{S_k≀S_n}(U_i ⊗ R), so all degree-d classes come from configurations with at most floor(2d/(q−1)) clusters; over Q the irreducible constituents stabilize for n ≥ ceil(4d/(q−1)). Applying the transfer map to coinvariants, the paper deduces that the unordered vertical configuration spaces are rationally (co)homologically stable: the stabilization maps are always injective and are isomorphisms for n ≥ floor(2d/(q−1)).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the maps that add a new far-away cluster and the maps that forget clusters can be made compatible up to homotopy in a single FI_{S_k}^♯-space structure; the paper cites an earlier argument for this compatibility rather than writing out the full proof, and if that compatibility failed the stability conclusions would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every degree-d rational cohomology class of rV^k_n(R^{p,q}) is accounted for by configurations with at most floor(2d/(q−1)) clusters: the group is an induced representation built from U_i for i ≤ floor(2d/(q−1)).
  • For n ≥ ceil(4d/(q−1)), the decomposition of H^d and H_d into irreducible S_k ≀ S_n-representations is independent of n, so computational results at finitely many n determine all n.
  • The character of H^d (and H_d) over Q is expressed by a single polynomial in the coloured cycle-counting functions, uniform in n.
  • The unordered spaces V^k_n(R^{p,q}) have rationally stable (co)homology: stabilization maps are injective in all degrees and isomorphisms for n ≥ floor(2d/(q−1)), improving the previous stable range when q ≥ 3.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the explicit ray-partition basis should allow closed-form polynomial formulas for the Betti numbers of rV^k_n(R^{p,q}) in each degree, not merely the polynomial-growth bound used here.
  • Inference: the stable range floor(2d/(q−1)) for the unordered spaces is likely not sharp in general; the sharper thresholds known for ordinary configuration spaces (the k=1, p=0 case) suggest room for improvement, especially for q odd.
  • Inference: the same FI_G^♯-module route should prove representation stability for any family of spaces with a ray-partition-style cohomology basis and a homotopy-compatible stabilization map, including clusters with further internal structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies ordered vertical configuration spaces rV^k_n(R^{p,q}) of n clusters of k points sharing their first p coordinates, with free actions of wreath products S_k ≀ S_n. Using Bianchi-Kranhold's explicit cohomology basis by ray partitions, the authors prove that in each cohomological degree d the Betti numbers grow polynomially in n with degree at most floor(2d/(q-1)). They then claim that the family Ver^k_■(R^{p,q}) carries a homotopy FI_{S_k}^sharp-space structure, so that the homology and cohomology groups form FI_{S_k}^sharp-modules. From the structure theory of FI_G^sharp-modules they deduce finite generation in degree at most floor(2d/(q-1)), representation stability over Q with stable range n ≥ ceil(4d/(q-1)), induced-representation decompositions, character polynomial descriptions, and a new proof of rational homological stability for the unordered vertical configuration spaces with improved stable range for q ≥ 3.

Significance. If the FI_{S_k}^sharp structure is fully justified, the main theorem is a substantial and clean result: it gives explicit finite generation degree, strong structural constraints on the wreath-product representations, character polynomials, and an improved rational homological stability range. The rank estimate from ray partitions is transparent and is a genuine contribution independent of the FI^sharp machinery. The paper carefully assembles existing tools from Sam-Snowden, Gan-Li, Casto, Ramos, Gadish, and Bianchi-Kranhold, and it does not rely on the target theorem, so there is no circularity. The main weakness is that the categorical structure asserted in Theorem 7.22, on which the central stability results depend, is delegated to a citation rather than proved in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 7.3, Theorem 7.22] Theorem 7.22 is the hinge of the paper: Corollary 7.23, Theorem 7.24, and all subsequent corollaries use the FI_{S_k}^sharp-module structure that it supplies. The proof is one sentence citing [CEF15, Proof of Proposition 6.4.2]. Proposition 7.21 only verifies the stabilizer condition for inclusions, which is the homotopy analogue of Lemma 3.14 and yields a homotopy FI_G-space, not a homotopy FI_G^sharp-space. For a general FI_G^sharp morphism (Z,f) with Z⊆A and f:Z→B an FI_G morphism, one must prove that deleting the clusters A\Z, applying f, and adding B\f(Z) far away is homotopic to the composite prescribed by the category, and that these homotopies compose coherently. The internal label permutations in f are precisely the part specific to wreath products, and they are not visibly covered by the cited CEF argument. Please expand the proof of Theorem 7.22 or provide a precise adaptation that addresses the FI_G twist data.
  2. [Section 7.3, Corollary 7.23] The claim that cohomology groups form FI_G^sharp-modules needs an additional stated argument. A covariant functor Ver^k_■ : FI_G^sharp → hTop induces a contravariant assignment on H^d, not a covariant one. To conclude that H^d is an FI_G^sharp-module, one must use the self-duality of FI_G^sharp, sending a partial G-map (Z,f) to the partial G-map (f(Z), f^{-1}); this identification is not stated or proved in the paper. Please add this observation or define homotopy FI_G^sharp-spaces so that the conversion from contravariant cohomology to a covariant FI_G^sharp-module is explicit.
  3. [Section 7.4, Theorem 7.24] The proof of the first bullet over an arbitrary commutative ring R is too terse. Corollary 7.14 bounds Q-Betti numbers, but finite generation of the FI_{S_k}^sharp-module over R is not a formal consequence of Q-polynomial growth unless one first applies Corollary 5.6(v) to the integral FI^sharp-module H^d(rV^k_n;Z), whose rank is polynomial by Theorem 7.13, and then tensors with R, or otherwise proves that H^d(rV^k_n;R) and H_d(rV^k_n;R) are free R-modules with polynomial rank. Please spell out this step so that the statement for arbitrary R follows from the displayed hypotheses.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.3] The phrase 'and and Bianchi–Kranhold' contains a duplicated 'and'; please correct this typo.
  2. [Definition 7.16] Definition 7.16 says 'A homotopy FI_G-space is a functor X from FI_G^sharp to hTop'; this should presumably read 'from FI_G', with homotopy FI_G^sharp-spaces defined separately from FI_G^sharp.
  3. [Definition 7.18] In the definition of Ver^k_B(R^{p,q}), the domain is written as T^k_S but should be T^k_B; please fix this notation.
  4. [Section 7.5.2] The displayed setup says the covers are equipped with maps \tilde φ_n : \tilde X_n → \tilde X_{n+1} and \tilde φ_n : \tilde X_{n+1} → \tilde X_n, using the same symbol for two different maps, and the following relations repeat the same formula. Please correct the notation and clarify the second map.
  5. [Section 7.1] The word 'compuation' should be 'computation' in the opening sentence of Section 7.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem follows from external cohomology computations and general FI_G theory, with the delegated FI^sharp construction being a proof gap rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 7.24) is derived from three independent inputs: (1) Bianchi–Kranhold's explicit integral cohomology basis (Theorem 7.6, [BK22, Theorem 3.7]), which yields the polynomial rank bound in Theorem 7.13; (2) the general FI_G and FI_G^sharp-module theory of Sam–Snowden, Gan–Li, Ramos, and Casto, especially the structure theorem for FI_G^sharp-modules (Theorem 5.4) and its consequence Corollary 5.6; and (3) the construction of a homotopy FI_{S_k}^sharp-space structure on Ver^k_*(R^{p,q}) (Theorem 7.22). None of these inputs is the target result, and none is authored by the present paper's authors. The rank bound is a bound on the size of an explicit ray-partition basis, not a disguised form of finite generation; finite generation in degree at most floor(2d/(q-1)) is obtained by feeding that rank bound through Corollary 5.6 after the FI^sharp-module structure has been established independently in Corollary 7.23. The adaptation of Church–Ellenberg–Farb's Proposition 6.4.2 in Theorem 7.22 is asserted rather than written out, and the compatibility of the co-FI_G action with stabilization maps for wreath-product twists is indeed the fragile hinge; however, this is a proof delegation or potential gap, not circularity, because the cited CEF argument is external and is not equivalent to the stability conclusion. The paper's citations to Wilson's earlier work appear only in literature-review and survey contexts and are not load-bearing. No equation in the paper reduces to its own inputs by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external published computations (Bianchi-Kranhold), on the FI_G^♯-module framework (Casto, Sam-Snowden, Gan-Li, Ramos, Church-Ellenberg-Farb), on Gadish's coinvariant theorem, and on the paper's own construction of a homotopy FI_{S_k}^♯-space structure, which is the least detailed step. There are no free parameters or invented entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The integral cohomology of vertical configuration spaces is freely generated by ray partitions, with the degree formula |u_Q| = p(r−a(Q)) + (q−1)(|K|−ℓ(Q)) (Bianchi-Kranhold, Theorem 7.6).
    This external computation is the foundation for the rank polynomial bounds in Section 7.2, which determine the finite generation degree of the FI^♯-modules.
  • domain assumption The structure theorem for FI_G^♯-modules: any FI^♯-module splits as a direct sum of induced modules M(T_d), and polynomial rank growth implies finite generation in the corresponding degree (Casto/CEF, Theorem 5.4 and Corollary 5.6).
    Used to convert rank polynomial bounds into finite generation degree and then into representation stability with explicit stable ranges.
  • standard math A homotopy FI_G^♯-space structure on a family of topological spaces induces FI_G^♯-module structures on its singular homology and cohomology groups.
    Invoked in Corollary 7.23; this is the standard homotopy functoriality of singular (co)homology.
  • domain assumption Gadish's theorem: for an induced FI_G-module generated in degree at most r, the coinvariant sequence is injective for all n and becomes isomorphisms for n ≥ r (Gadish, Proposition 7.33).
    Used in Section 7.5.3 to pass from representation stability of the ordered spaces to classical homological stability of the unordered spaces.
  • ad hoc to paper The family Ver^k_■(R^{p,q}) admits the structure of a homotopy FI_{S_k}^♯-space with respect to the precomposition and stabilization maps (Theorem 7.22).
    This is the paper's own construction. Its verification is delegated to arguments from CEF15's proof of Proposition 6.4.2. If the homotopy compatibility fails, the FI^♯-module structure and the main theorems would not follow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Representation stability in the (co)homology of vertical configuration spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PUSMGASU

@misc{pith2026241201128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Representation stability in the (co)homology of vertical configuration spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PUSMGASU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01128}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study sequences of topological spaces called "vertical configuration spaces" of points in Euclidean space. We apply the theory of FI$_G$-modules, and results of Bianchi-Kranhold, to show that their (co)homology groups are "representation stable" with respect to natural actions of wreath products $S_k \wr S_n$. In particular, we show that in each (co)homological degree, the (co)homology groups (viewed as $S_k \wr S_n$-representations) can be expressed as induced representations of a specific form. Consequently, the characters of their rational (co)homology groups, and the patterns of irreducible $S_k \wr S_n$-representation constituents of these groups, stabilize in a strong sense. In addition, we give a new proof of rational (co)homological stability for unordered vertical configuration spaces, with an improved stable range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01128 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An element of V˜ p3,4,2qpR 1,1 q. The 9 points are partitioned into three clusters of 3, 4, and 2 points, respectively. Points in each cluster are subject to a colinearity condition. The case q “ 1 is the origin of the name ‘vertical’ configuration space. Figure adapted from Bianchi–Kranhold [BK22, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An element of V˜ p3,4,3qpR 1,2 q. The 10 points are partitioned into three clusters of 3, 4, and 3 points, respectively. Points in each cluster are subject to a coplanarity condition. Figure adapted from Bianchi–Kranhold [BK22, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An element of Vp2,2,2,2,2qpR 1,1 q. The 10 points in R 2 are partitioned into 5 unlabelled “vertical clusters” of 2 unlabelled points each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The stabilization map V˜ p3,2,4qpR 1,1 q Ñ V˜ p3,2,4,2qpR 1,1 q. Figure adapted from Bianchi–Kranhold [BK22, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The stabilization map ϕ5 : V 2 5 pR 1,1 q Ñ V 2 6 pR 1,1 q. Figure adapted from Bianchi– Kranhold [BK22, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Martin Aigner, A course in enumeration, Springer, 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    V. I. Arnold, Certain topological invariants of algebraic functions, Trudy Moskov. Mat. Ob s c. 21 (1970), 27--46. 274462

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    Vladimir Igorevich Arnol'd, Certain topological invariants of algebraic functions, Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva 21 (1970), 27--46

    work page 1970

  4. [4]

    Andrea Bianchi and Florian Kranhold, Vertical configuration spaces and their homology, Q. J. Math. 73 (2022), no. 4, 1279--1306. 4520220

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Kevin Casto, FI_G -modules, orbit configuration spaces, and complex reflection groups , 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Thomas Church and Jordan S Ellenberg, Representation stability references, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.01022 (2015)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    4, 2373--2418

    Thomas Church and Jordan Ellenberg, Homology of FI -modules , Geometry & Topology 21 (2017), no. 4, 2373--2418

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Ellenberg, and Benson Farb, FI -modules and stability for representations of symmetric groups , Duke Math

    Thomas Church, Jordan S. Ellenberg, and Benson Farb, FI -modules and stability for representations of symmetric groups , Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), no. 9, 1833--1910. 3357185

    work page 2015

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    5, 2951--2984

    Thomas Church, Jordan S Ellenberg, Benson Farb, and Rohit Nagpal, FI -modules over N oetherian rings , Geometry & Topology 18 (2014), no. 5, 2951--2984

    2014

  2. [10]

    Thomas Church and Benson Farb, Representation theory and homological stability, Adv. Math. 245 (2013), 250--314. 3084430

    2013

  3. [11]

    2, 465--504

    Thomas Church, Homological stability for configuration spaces of manifolds, Inventiones mathematicae 188 (2012), no. 2, 465--504

    2012

  4. [12]

    2, 89--90

    Alfred H Clifford, Representations induced in an invariant subgroup, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 23 (1937), no. 2, 89--90

    1937

  5. [13]

    Benson Farb, Representation stability, arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.4065 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    129, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    William Fulton and Joe Harris, Representation theory: a first course, vol. 129, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  7. [15]

    Nir Gadish, Categories of FI type: a unified approach to generalizing representation stability and character polynomials , Journal of Algebra 480 (2017), 450--486

    2017

  8. [16]

    , Representation stability for families of linear subspace arrangements, Advances in Mathematics 322 (2017), 341--377

    2017

  9. [17]

    Wee Liang Gan and Liping Li, Coinduction functor in representation stability theory, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 92 (2015), no. 3, 689--711. 3431657

    2015

  10. [18]

    (N.S.) 25 (2019), no

    , Linear stable range for homology of congruence subgroups via FI -modules , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 25 (2019), no. 4, Paper No. 55, 11. 3997138

    2019

  11. [19]

    Allen Hatcher, Algebraic topology, Cambridge University Press, 2002

    2002

  12. [20]

    Sarah Herberz, Vertikale konfigurationsraume-homotopie-gruppen fur partitionen der lange zwei, Bachelor's thesis, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    Patricia Hersh and Victor Reiner, Representation stability for cohomology of configuration spaces in R ^d , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2017), no. 5, 1433--1486, With an appendix written jointly with Steven Sam. 3658170

    2017

  14. [22]

    Frank Ingram, Naihuan Jing, and Ernie Stitzinger, Wreath product symmetric functions, arXiv preprint arXiv:0809.2439 (2008)

    2008 arXiv

  15. [23]

    16, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1981, With a foreword by P

    Gordon James and Adalbert Kerber, The representation theory of the symmetric group, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 16, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1981, With a foreword by P. M. Cohn, With an introduction by Gilbert de B. Robinson. 644144

    1981

  16. [24]

    Rita Jim\'enez Rolland and Jennifer C. H. Wilson, Stability properties of moduli spaces, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 69 (2022), no. 4, 522--533. 4398059

    2022

  17. [25]

    Florian Kranhold, Configuration spaces of clusters as E_d -algebras , arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02729 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Genta Latifi, Vertical configuration spaces and homological stability, Master's thesis, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Dusa McDuff, Configuration spaces of positive and negative particles, Topology 14 (1975), 91--107. 358766

    1975

  20. [28]

    3, 1371--1444

    Martin Palmer, Homological stability for moduli spaces of disconnected submanifolds, i, Algebraic & Geometric Topology 21 (2021), no. 3, 1371--1444

    2021

  21. [29]

    13, 2521 -- 2598

    Andrew Putman and Steven V Sam, Representation stability and finite linear groups , Duke Mathematical Journal 166 (2017), no. 13, 2521 -- 2598

    2017

  22. [30]

    Andrew Putman, Stability in the homology of congruence subgroups, Inventiones mathematicae 202 (2015), 987--1027

    2015

  23. [31]

    Eric Ramos, Homological invariants of FI -modules and FI _ G -modules , Journal of Algebra 502 (2018), 163--195

    2018

  24. [32]

    Christian Martin Wilhelm Rosner, Vertikale konfigurationsraume-fadell-neuwirth fasserung und eilenberg-maclane, Bachelor's thesis, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Steven V Sam, Notes for M ath 847: Representation S tability

  26. [34]

    1, 38--44

    , Structures in representation stability, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 67 (2020), no. 1, 38--44

    2020

  27. [35]

    143 (1979), no

    Graeme Segal, The topology of spaces of rational functions, Acta Math. 143 (1979), no. 1-2, 39--72. 533892

    1979

  28. [36]

    Andrew Snowden, Syzygies of S egre embeddings and -modules , Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 2, 225--277. 3018955

    2013

  29. [37]

    , Algebraic structures in representation stability, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Steven V Sam and Andrew Snowden, Introduction to twisted commutative algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:1209.5122 (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    3, Cambridge University Press, 2015, p

    , Stability patterns in representation theory, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. e11

    2015

  32. [40]

    Sam and Andrew Snowden, Gr\"obner methods for representations of combinatorial categories, J

    Steven V. Sam and Andrew Snowden, Gr\"obner methods for representations of combinatorial categories, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (2017), no. 1, 159--203. 3556290

    2017

  33. [41]

    Reine Angew

    , Representations of categories of G -maps , J. Reine Angew. Math. 750 (2019), 197--226. 3943321

    2019

  34. [42]

    5, 2105--2126

    Itamar Stein, The L ittlewood-- R ichardson rule for wreath products with symmetric groups and the quiver of the category F FI_n , Communications in Algebra 45 (2017), no. 5, 2105--2126

    2017

  35. [43]

    2, 909--931

    Jennifer Wilson, Representation stability for the cohomology of the pure string motion groups, Algebraic & Geometric Topology 12 (2012), no. 2, 909--931

    2012

  36. [44]

    Jennifer CH Wilson, FI_W -modules and stability criteria for representations of classical W eyl groups , Journal of Algebra 420 (2014), 269--332

    2014

  37. [45]

    1, 1--42

    , FI_W -modules and constraints on classical W eyl group characters , Mathematische Zeitschrift 281 (2015), no. 1, 1--42

    2015

  38. [46]

    Jennifer C. H. Wilson, An introduction to FI -modules and their generalizations , http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/ jchw/FILectures.pdf, 2018, Summer School Lecture Notes

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.