Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 82 references

Topological Valley Photonic Waveguides: Scattering matrix evaluation for linear computing

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A six-port junction of valley photonic crystal waveguides, excited at a single telecom-frequency port, splits the signal into three equal outputs with no reflection, and its scattering matrix predicts multi-input routing.

desk verdict A new 6-port valley photonic junction with equal splitting and an S-matrix design flow; the core result holds but the zero-coupling assumption needs quantification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02388 v1 pith:CL7YPUBZ submitted 2024-12-03 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Christian Johnson-Richards , Alex Yakovlev , Victor Pacheco-Peña This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords topologicalphotonicsvalleyphotoniccrystalsscatteringmatrixpowersplittinglinearcomputingopticalwaveguidestelecomwavelengthsix-portjunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a six-port junction built from valley photonic crystal waveguides and shows that, at a telecom frequency near 192 THz, a signal entering one port is split equally among ports 2, 4, and 6 while ports 1, 3, and 5 stay dark. The authors extract a frequency-dependent 6x6 scattering matrix of the junction and use it, together with the system's linearity, to compute what input phases and amplitudes would send outputs to chosen ports. They demonstrate two such linear computing operations: a two-input device that routes the combined signal to two outputs, and a wave director that concentrates all inputs onto a single port. The stated payoff is that larger photonic networks could be designed analytically from the scattering matrix rather than by expensive trial-and-error numerical simulation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the valley photonic crystal (VPC) waveguide: a hexagonal silicon lattice with two air holes of unequal radii that breaks spatial inversion symmetry, opens a bandgap, and supports an edge state with a unique wavevector at the interface between a VPC and its mirror image. Six copies of this interface are rotated by 60 degrees around a hexagonal junction so that every port sees the same waveguide orientation. The argument runs through the valley-Chern incompatibility of the K and K' edge states: a port-1 signal couples only to the three waveguides sharing its orientation (ports 2, 4, and 6), and is forbidden from the three opposite-oriented waveguides (ports 1, 3, and 5). The extracted frequency-dependent 6x6 scattering matrix, assembled from one-port simulations using rotational symmetry and reciprocity, turns that splitting behavior into a linear operator $Y = M_S X$ that can be inverted to design inputs for chosen outputs.

What would settle it

Measure the power leaving each of the six ports of a fabricated or simulated junction of side length $19.5a$ for a port-1 excitation across 187 to 199 THz; if any of ports 1, 3, or 5 carries an output comparable to the roughly 0.33 seen at ports 2, 4, and 6 near 192.08 THz, the valley-incompatibility assumption fails and the 6x6 scattering matrix built from one-port excitation is not the full description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a 6-port junction formed by six type-I VPC-VPC waveguides arranged at 60-degree intervals behaves as a nearly ideal equal-power splitter at $f_s \approx 192.08$ THz: for excitation at port 1, $|S|^2 \approx 0.33$ to ports 2, 4, and 6, and approximately zero to ports 3, 5, and back to port 1. Because the junction is rotationally symmetric and reciprocal, the measured one-port scattering parameters determine the full 6x6 scattering matrix $M_S$, which varies smoothly across the unique-edge-state band. The paper further argues that, since the junction is linear, the relation $Y = M_S X$ with input phasor vector $X$ and output phasor vector $Y$ lets a designer choose inputs that produce any desired output vector; this is validated numerically for two input vectors $X_1$ (splitting the combined signal to ports 3 and 5) and $X_2$ (directing everything to port 4). The broader claim is that this procedure removes the need for brute-force numerical search when building larger junctions and routing networks.

Load-bearing premise

The design assumes the two valley edge states are fundamentally incompatible at the junction, so a signal entering at port 1 is forbidden from leaving through ports 1, 3, or 5; if the finite-size junction causes valley scattering, those forbidden ports would carry power and the extracted scattering matrix would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $f_s \approx 192.08$ THz the junction acts as a 1-to-3 equal splitter with negligible reflection, offering a compact topological power divider at telecom wavelengths.
  • The extracted frequency-dependent 6x6 scattering matrix describes the junction across the unique-edge-state band, so outputs for any combination of input amplitudes and phases can be predicted analytically through $Y = M_S X$.
  • The paper's two examples show that desired output patterns can be inverted for: a two-input phase-shifted signal is routed to ports 3 and 5, and a three-input wave-director pattern routes all power to port 4.
  • Because design is reduced to matrix inversion rather than numerical search, larger junction networks for routing or linear computing can be assembled and tested analytically before full-wave simulation.
  • The matrix description is only valid inside the unique-edge-state band; outside that band, reflections and non-unique wavevectors appear and the simple linear picture breaks down.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inversion step shown for two output vectors would work for any output vector inside the unique-edge-state band, since the junction is linear; testing a library of target vectors would map the device's full linear-computing capability.
  • The small offset between the equal-splitting frequency and the design frequency hints that the junction's central defect, not only the bulk band structure, sets the working point; varying the junction geometry could tune $f_s$ across the band.
  • If intervalley scattering does appear in larger or differently shaped junctions, the zero-coupling entries of the matrix would become nonzero; the method would then need a full multi-port excitation measurement rather than one-port-plus-symmetry, which is a natural extension rather than a repudiation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and numerically studies a six-port junction built from valley photonic crystal (VPC) waveguides. A single-port excitation at P1 is shown to split power approximately equally into ports P2, P4, and P6 at a frequency near 192.08 THz, with very small transmission to the other ports. The authors extract the magnitude and phase of the scattering parameters from one-port simulations, then construct a full 6x6 scattering matrix using 60-degree rotational symmetry and reciprocity. This matrix is inverted in Section 4 to synthesize two-input excitations that route signals to prescribed output ports, and the predictions are checked with full-wave simulations of the same junction. The paper claims that the extracted scattering matrix enables analytic design of larger photonic networks without expensive trial-and-error optimization.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a useful methodology: characterizing a multiport topological junction through a scattering matrix and using linear superposition to design routing operations. The numerical work is clearly described (MEEP and COMSOL setups, mesh sizes, source placement, normalization), which is a reproducibility strength. The use of symmetry and reciprocity to reconstruct the 6x6 matrix is elegant and the two-input demonstrations provide a nontrivial check of linear behavior. However, the validity of the entire design flow rests on the assumption that coupling to ports P1, P3, and P5 is exactly zero within the operating band, and this assumption is not quantitatively verified. The sign error in Eq. (1b) also needs correction before the central equal-splitting result can be taken at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 4c and text after Eq. (1)] The central load-bearing assumption is that transmission from P1 to P1, P3, and P5 is zero: the text states these values are 'approximately zero' and then 'from now on, these will be considered as zero.' Because the full 6x6 scattering matrix is constructed from the P1 row using rotational symmetry and reciprocity, every entry connecting to these ports is set to exactly zero by construction. Section 4 then inverts this matrix to compute input vectors X1 = M_S^{-1}Y1 and X2 = M_S^{-1}Y2 and predicts the outputs. If finite-size intervalley scattering at the junction produces even a few percent leakage into the nominally forbidden ports, the synthesized inputs and predicted outputs are incomplete. The manuscript later acknowledges 'small reflections' and a 'lossy scattering matrix,' but it never reports the actual values of |S11|^2, |S31|^2, or |S51|^2 within the green unique-wavevector band. Please provide these values across the band (or at least at f_s) and discuss how they affect the matrix inversion and the accuracy of the routing and wave-director demonstrations.
  2. [Eq. (1b)] The printed formula for |S_P4|^2 is |S_P4|^2 = -(0.03226)f - 6.52928, which gives a negative power ratio at every frequency in the operating band (about -12.7 at f = 192 THz). This is inconsistent with the physical meaning of |S|^2 and with the value |S_P4|^2 ≈ 0.33 at f_s shown in Figure 4c and 4d. The sign of the intercept (or the slope) appears to be wrong. Since these linear fits are used to locate the equal-power-splitting frequency f_s, the corrected expression must be provided and, if the fit coefficients change, f_s and the reported |S|^2 values must be recomputed.
  3. [Section 4] The two-input demonstrations validate the linear model on the same structure from which M_S was extracted: the same junction, same port definitions, and same simulation setup are used both to synthesize the inputs and to test the outputs. This is a genuine check of linear superposition and of the internal consistency of the scattering-matrix representation, but it does not establish the claimed portability of the approach to 'larger networks' or to junctions of different sizes. The abstract and conclusion claim that the extracted scattering matrix can be used to design larger networks without expensive trial-and-error methods; that claim goes beyond the evidence presented. Either add a demonstration involving a different junction size or a network of multiple junctions, or temper the claim to say that the matrix enables analytic prediction for the characterized junction itself.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 6.1 vs. Section 2.2] The spectral window for the supercell band-structure calculation is given as '155 ≤ f ≤ 225 THz' in Section 2.2 and as '155 ≤ f ≤ 255' in Section 6.1; please unify these values.
  2. [Eqs. (1d)-(1f)] The phase fits have large negative intercepts (around -327 to -345 rad) and slopes near 1.76 rad/THz, implying many radians of phase variation across the green band. Please clarify whether the retrieved phases were unwrapped before fitting and whether the linear fits are intended to represent wrapped or unwrapped phase.
  3. [Abstract and Section 3] The abstract states the junction exhibits equal power splitting 'with no reflections,' while Section 3 acknowledges 'approximately zero' transmission and later mentions small reflections and a lossy scattering matrix. Please make the wording consistent and indicate the quantitative level at which reflections are negligible.
  4. [Figure 4c caption] The caption says the vertical dashed lines i-iii correspond to 188 THz, f_s, and 199 THz, but the text earlier refers to the unique-wavevector band as extending to about 199.9 THz; please check that the third frequency lies inside the intended band and that the labeling is consistent with Figure 3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the S-matrix is extracted from single-port simulations and then used to predict multi-port outputs that are verified by new simulations, which is a genuine test of linear superposition.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The 6x6 scattering matrix M_S is assembled from single-port excitation data at P1 using rotational symmetry and reciprocity, and it is then used to compute output vectors Y = M_S X for two-port and three-port inputs. These multi-port predictions are checked with fresh numerical simulations (Figure 5b(ii-iii,v-vi)), i.e., with excitations that were not used to build M_S. The agreement between the analytical and numerical results is therefore an independent validation of linear superposition, not a restatement of the fit. The equal-power-splitting frequency f_s is explicitly described as 'interpolated from the linear fit in Figure 4c', so the paper does not disguise a fit as a prediction. The main simplifying step, setting coupling to ports P1, P3, and P5 to zero based on the valley-Chern incompatibility argument and the observed small signals, is a modeling assumption that could fail for finite-size junctions, and the paper acknowledges small reflections and a lossy scattering matrix. That is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circular reduction: the multi-port outputs still contain information not put into the single-port S-matrix extraction. The self-citations to the authors' previous waveguide-junction works support the standard phasor/scattering-matrix formalism but are not load-bearing; the same formalism is cited to Pozar, and the central validation is simulation-based. Hence no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard topological photonics assumptions and on a set of linear fits to simulated S-parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameters are the lattice constant, hole ratio, junction size, and the linear-fit coefficients for the scattering matrix.

free parameters (4)
  • Lattice constant a = 0.34 µm
    Chosen to place the bulk bandgap near the telecom design frequency of 193.4 THz; varied in the bandgap study (Figure 2).
  • Hole ratio Ω = r2/r1 = 0.5
    Selected as a tradeoff between topological protection (large bulk bandgap) and deviation of the unique-wavevector band center from f_design (Section 2.2).
  • Junction size d_hex = 19.5a
    Chosen so that retrieved scattering parameters only capture light coupled into the waveguides; dependence studied in SI Section 3.
  • Linear fit coefficients for S-parameters = Slopes/intercepts in Eqs. (1a)-(1f)
    Fitted to simulated |S|^2 and phase data in the unique wavevector band; these coefficients constitute the frequency-dependent scattering matrix used for the design examples.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Valley-Chern number and topological protection of VPC-VPC edge states
    Assumed from prior literature (refs [47], [52], [57]) and evidenced by supercell band structure; used to justify unique guided wavevector and negligible backscattering.
  • domain assumption K and K' valley edge states do not couple at the junction
    Invoked in Section 3 to predict zero transmission to ports P1, P3, P5; load-bearing for the equal splitting and the S-matrix structure.
  • standard math Reciprocity and C6 rotational symmetry of the junction
    Used to build the full 6x6 scattering matrix from a single-port excitation (Section 3, 'as the 6-port structure is both rotationally symmetric and reciprocal').
  • standard math Linearity and time-invariance of Maxwell's equations in passive dielectric structures
    Basis for superposition used in computing outputs from multiple inputs via Y = M_S X.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Valley Photonic Waveguides: Scattering matrix evaluation for linear computing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CL7YPUBZ

@misc{pith2026241202388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Valley Photonic Waveguides: Scattering matrix evaluation for linear computing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CL7YPUBZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02388}
}
read the original abstract

Topological boundary modes utilizing valley mode waveguides have opened opportunities in, for instance, the design of high transmission waveguides with tolerance to geometrical defects and sharp bends. Applications of these waveguides include linear computational processes and the emulation of logic gates using linear structures, among other scenarios. Here we present the design of a 6-port junction that exhibits equal power splitting to three other ports when excited at single port with no reflections. In studying this structure, a scattering matrix is extracted at telecom wavelengths (around 1550 nm). The linearity of the system along with the scattering matrix are exploited to produce linear operations such as routing of information considering two incident signals or multiple signals applied from different ports. Our work may be exploited to analytically design larger networks without the need of computationally expensive trial and error numerical methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Engheta and R

    N. Engheta and R. W. Ziolkowski, Metamaterials. Wiley, 2006. doi: 10.1002/0471784192

    work page doi:10.1002/0471784192 2006

  2. [2]

    Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials -a review,

    G. Oliveri, D. H. Werner, and A. Massa, “Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials -a review,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 1034–1056, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2394292

    work page arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Tripod-Loop Metasurfaces for Terahertz-Sensing Applications: A Comparison,

    I. Jáuregui-López, B. Orazbayev, V. Pacheco-Peña, and M. Beruete, “Tripod-Loop Metasurfaces for Terahertz-Sensing Applications: A Comparison,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 18, p. 6504, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10186504

    work page doi:10.3390/app10186504 2020

  4. [4]

    Experimental demonstration of deeply subwavelength dielectric sensing with epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) waveguides,

    M. Beruete, N. Engheta, V. Pacheco-Peña, and A. Phys Lett, “Experimental demonstration of deeply subwavelength dielectric sensing with epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett, vol. 120, no. 81106, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0079665

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0079665 2022

  5. [5]

    New horizons in near-zero refractive index photonics and hyperbolic metamaterials,

    M. Lobet et al., “New horizons in near-zero refractive index photonics and hyperbolic metamaterials,” ACS Photonics, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 3805–3820, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00747

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00747 2023

  6. [6]

    Photoluminescence control by hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces: a review

    L. Y. Beliaev, O. Takayama, P. N. Melentiev, and A. V Lavrinenko, “Photoluminescence control by hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces: a review”, doi: 10.29026/oea.2021.210031

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Reconfigurable dielectric resonators with imbedded impedance surfaces - From enhanced and directional to suppressed scattering,

    R. E. Jacobsen, A. V. Lavrinenko, and S. Arslanagić, “Reconfigurable dielectric resonators with imbedded impedance surfaces - From enhanced and directional to suppressed scattering,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 122, no. 8, p. 81701, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0139695/2872894

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0139695/2872894 2023

  8. [8]

    Neural Network Design of Multilayer Metamaterial for Temporal Differentiation,

    T. Knightley, A. Yakovlev, and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Neural Network Design of Multilayer Metamaterial for Temporal Differentiation,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 11, no. 5, p. 2202351, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202202351

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202202351 2023

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Generalized Space-Time Engineered Modulation (GSTEM) Metamaterials: A global and extended perspective,

    C. Caloz, Z. L. Deck-Leger, A. Bahrami, O. C. Vicente, and Z. Li, “Generalized Space-Time Engineered Modulation (GSTEM) Metamaterials: A global and extended perspective,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 50–60, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1109/MAP.2022.3216773. 24

    2023

  2. [10]

    Effective medium concept in temporal metamaterials,

    V. Pacheco-Peña and N. Engheta, “Effective medium concept in temporal metamaterials,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 379–391, 2020, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0305

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    An Archimedes’ screw for light,

    E. Galiffi, P. A. Huidobro, and J. B. Pendry, “An Archimedes’ screw for light,” Nat. Commun. 2022 131, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, May 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30079-z

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Temporal chirp, temporal lensing and temporal routing via space-time interfaces,

    V. Pacheco-Peña, M. Fink, and N. Engheta, “Temporal chirp, temporal lensing and temporal routing via space-time interfaces,” arXiv:2311.10855, Nov. 2023, Accessed: Mar. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10855v1

    2023

  5. [13]

    Merging Effective Medium Concepts of Spatial and Temporal Media: Opening new avenues for manipulating wave-matter interaction in 4D,

    V. Pacheco-Pena and N. Engheta, “Merging Effective Medium Concepts of Spatial and Temporal Media: Opening new avenues for manipulating wave-matter interaction in 4D,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 39–49, 2023, doi: 10.1109/MAP.2023.3254480

    2023

  6. [14]

    Metasurface Dome for Above-the-Horizon Grating Lobes Reduction in 5G-NR Systems,

    D. Ramaccia et al., “Metasurface Dome for Above-the-Horizon Grating Lobes Reduction in 5G-NR Systems,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2176–2180, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2022.3196324

    2022

  7. [15]

    Design of reconfigurable Huygens metasurfaces based on Drude-like scatterers operating in the epsilon-negative regime,

    A. Monti et al., “Design of reconfigurable Huygens metasurfaces based on Drude-like scatterers operating in the epsilon-negative regime,” arXiv:2404.01315, Mar. 2024, Accessed: Jun. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01315v1

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Optically Controlled Gain Modulation for Microwave Metasurface Antennas,

    C. Tripon-Canseliet, C. Della Giovampaola, N. Pavy, J. Chazelas, and S. Maci, “Optically Controlled Gain Modulation for Microwave Metasurface Antennas,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 1911, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24061911

    1911 doi

  9. [17]

    Tunable metasurfaces towards versatile metalenses and metaholograms: a review,

    J. Kim, J. Seong, Y. Yang, S.-W. Moon, T. Badloe, and J. Rho, “Tunable metasurfaces towards versatile metalenses and metaholograms: a review,” Adv. Photonics, vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 1–16, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1117/1.AP.4.2.024001

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Broadband Reflecting Luneburg Lenses Based on Bed-of-Nails Metasurfaces,

    C. Bilitos, X. Morvan, E. Martini, R. Sauleau, S. Maci, and D. González-Ovejero, “Broadband Reflecting Luneburg Lenses Based on Bed-of-Nails Metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 1923–1928, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2023.3341208

    1923

  11. [19]

    Breaking the limitation of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise,

    B. Xiong et al., “Breaking the limitation of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise,” Science (80-. )., vol. 379, no. 6629, pp. 294–299, 2023, doi: 10.1126/science.ade5140

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Unidirectional transparency in epsilon-near-zero based rectangular waveguides induced by parity-time symmetry,

    M. Nicolussi, J. A. Riley, and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Unidirectional transparency in epsilon-near-zero based rectangular waveguides induced by parity-time symmetry,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 119, no. 26, p. 263507, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0076236

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Topological photonics: From crystals to particles,

    G. Siroki, P. A. Huidobro, and V. Giannini, “Topological photonics: From crystals to particles,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, no. 4, p. 041408, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041408

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Analogue computing with metamaterials,

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad, D. L. Sounas, A. Alù, and R. Fleury, “Analogue computing with metamaterials,” Nat. Rev. Mater., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207–225, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-00243-2

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Perfect splitting in rectangular- waveguide junctions for analog computing,

    W. Rogers, C. Johnson-Richards, A. Yakovlev, and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Perfect splitting in rectangular- waveguide junctions for analog computing,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 21, no. 5, p. 054054, May 2024, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.054054

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Inverse -designed low- index-contrast structures on a silicon photonics platform for vector –matrix multiplication,

    V. Nikkhah, A. Pirmoradi, F. Ashtiani, B. Edwards, F. Aflatouni, and N. Engheta, “Inverse -designed low- index-contrast structures on a silicon photonics platform for vector –matrix multiplication,” Nat. Photonics 2024, pp. 1–8, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41566-024-01394-2

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Quantized Hall Effect.,

    K. von Klitzing, “Quantized Hall Effect.,” Phys. B Phys. Condens. Matter C At. Mol. Plasma Physics, Opt. , vol. 126 B-C, no. 1–3, pp. 242–249, 1984

    1984

  18. [26]

    New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine- structure constant based on quantized hall resistance,

    K. V. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, “New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine- structure constant based on quantized hall resistance,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 494–497, 1980, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.494

    1980 doi

  19. [27]

    Quantization of particle transport,

    D. J. Thouless, “Quantization of particle transport,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 6083–6087, 1983, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.6083

    1983 doi

  20. [28]

    Topological Invariants,

    S. Q. Shen, “Topological Invariants,” Springer Ser. Solid-State Sci., vol. 187, pp. 51–79, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4606-3_4

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Topological network transport in on-chip phononic crystals,

    R. Zheng et al., “Topological network transport in on-chip phononic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 107, no. 24, p. 245122, 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.245122. 25

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    Valley current splitter in minimally twisted bilayer graphene,

    T. Hou, Y. Ren, Y. Quan, J. Jung, W. Ren, and Z. Qiao, “Valley current splitter in minimally twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085433

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    Possible Realization of Directional Optical Waveguides in Photonic Crystals with Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry,

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, “Possible Realization of Directional Optical Waveguides in Photonic Crystals with Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 100, no. 1, p. 013904, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904

    2005 doi

  24. [33]

    A silicon-on-insulator slab for topological valley transport,

    X.-T. T. He et al., “A silicon-on-insulator slab for topological valley transport,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08881-z

    2019 doi

  25. [34]

    Scattering-matrix approach for a quantitative evaluation of the topological protection in valley photonic crystals,

    G. Lévêque et al., “Scattering-matrix approach for a quantitative evaluation of the topological protection in valley photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 108, no. 4, p. 43505, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.043505

    2023 doi

  26. [35]

    Electrical tunable topological valley photonic crystals for on -chip optical communications in the telecom band,

    Z. Qi et al., “Electrical tunable topological valley photonic crystals for on -chip optical communications in the telecom band,” Nanophotonics, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 4273–4285, 2022, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2022- 0169

    2022 doi

  27. [36]

    Topologically protected Mach -Zehnder interferometer,

    P. Yang, P. Jiang, X. Guo, and L. Hou, “Topologically protected Mach -Zehnder interferometer,” J. Opt. (United Kingdom), vol. 22, no. 10, p. 105001, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/abac20

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    Topologically protected beam splitters and logic gates based on two-dimensional silicon photonic crystal slabs,

    L. He, H. Y. Ji, Y. J. Wang, and X. D. Zhang, “Topologically protected beam splitters and logic gates based on two-dimensional silicon photonic crystal slabs,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, no. 23, p. 34015, 2020, doi: 10.1364/oe.409265

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    Tunable three-way topological energy-splitter,

    M. P. Makwana and G. Chaplain, “Tunable three-way topological energy-splitter,” Sci. Reports 2019 91, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55485-0

    2019 doi

  30. [39]

    Topological beam-splitting in photonic crystals,

    S. Guenneau, R. Craster, and M. Makwana, “Topological beam-splitting in photonic crystals,” Opt. Express, Vol. 27, Issue 11, pp. 16088-16102, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 16088–16102, May 2019, doi: 10.1364/OE.27.016088

    2019 doi

  31. [40]

    Design and analysis of 2D one -way splitter waveguide based on topological photonics,

    M. Mehdipoura, M. Moeini, V. Ahmadi, and R. Poursalehi, “Design and analysis of 2D one -way splitter waveguide based on topological photonics,” Sci. Reports 2024 141, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62816-3

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    Novel optical XOR/OR logic gates based on topologically protected valley photonic crystals edges,

    M.-H. Chao, B. Cheng, Q.-S. Liu, W.-J. Zhang, Y. Xu, and G.-F. Song, “Novel optical XOR/OR logic gates based on topologically protected valley photonic crystals edges,” J. Opt., vol. 23, no. 11, p. 115002, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/ac11ac

    2021 doi

  33. [42]

    Topologically Protected Valley-Dependent Quantum Photonic Circuits,

    Y. Chen et al., “Topologically Protected Valley-Dependent Quantum Photonic Circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 23, p. 230503, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.230503

    2021 doi

  34. [43]

    Topological Insulator Laser Using Valley -Hall Photonic Crystals,

    Y. Gong, S. Wong, A. J. Bennett, D. L. Huffaker, and S. S. Oh, “Topological Insulator Laser Using Valley -Hall Photonic Crystals,” ACS Photonics, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2089–2097, 2020, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00521

    2020 doi

  35. [44]

    Topological bulk lasing modes using an imaginary gauge field,

    S. Wong and S. S. Oh, “Topological bulk lasing modes using an imaginary gauge field,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, p. 033042, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVRESEARCH.3.033042/FIGURES/14/MEDIUM

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    Topological photonics,

    T. Ozawa et al., “Topological photonics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 91, no. 1, p. 15006, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006

    2019 doi

  37. [46]

    Experimental Observation of Large Chern Numbers in Photonic Crystals,

    S. A. Skirlo, L. Lu, Y. Igarashi, Q. Yan, J. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Experimental Observation of Large Chern Numbers in Photonic Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, no. 25, pp. 1–6, 2015, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.253901

    2015 doi

  38. [47]

    Photonic Topological Insulators: A Beginner’s Introduction [Electromagnetic Perspectives],

    D. Bisharat, R. Davis, Y. Zhou, P. Bandaru, and D. Sievenpiper, “Photonic Topological Insulators: A Beginner’s Introduction [Electromagnetic Perspectives],” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 112–124, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1109/MAP.2021.3069276

    2021

  39. [48]

    One-way edge mode in a magneto-optical honeycomb photonic crystal,

    X. Ao, Z. Lin, and C. T. Chan, “One-way edge mode in a magneto-optical honeycomb photonic crystal,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 80, no. 3, p. 033105, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.033105

    2009 doi

  40. [49]

    Observation of unidirectional backscattering - immune topological electromagnetic states,

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Observation of unidirectional backscattering - immune topological electromagnetic states,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7265, pp. 772–775, 2009, doi: 10.1038/nature08293. 26

    2009 doi

  41. [50]

    Valley topological line-defects for Terahertz waveguides and power divider,

    B. L. Li et al., “Valley topological line-defects for Terahertz waveguides and power divider,” Opt. Mater. (Amst)., vol. 126, no. February, p. 112152, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112152

    2022

  42. [51]

    Topological Photonic Integrated Circuits Based on Valley Kink States,

    J. Ma, X. Xi, and X. Sun, “Topological Photonic Integrated Circuits Based on Valley Kink States,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: 10.1002/lpor.201900087

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    Evolution of topological edge modes from honeycomb photonic crystals to triangular-lattice photonic crystals,

    J. K. Yang, Y. Hwang, and S. S. Oh, “Evolution of topological edge modes from honeycomb photonic crystals to triangular-lattice photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022025

    2021 doi

  44. [53]

    Topological Directional Coupler,

    Y. Li, M. Jung, Y. Yu, Y. Han, B. Zhang, and G. Shvets, “Topological Directional Coupler,” Laser Photon. Rev., vol. 18, no. 11, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1002/lpor.202301313

    2024 doi

  45. [54]

    Pseudo-spin switches and Aharonov-Bohm effect for topological boundary modes,

    Y. Kawaguchi et al., “Pseudo-spin switches and Aharonov-Bohm effect for topological boundary modes,” Sci. Adv., vol. 10, no. 15, p. 6095, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn6095

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    Observation of strong backscattering in valley-Hall photonic topological interface modes,

    C. A. Rosiek et al., “Observation of strong backscattering in valley-Hall photonic topological interface modes,” Nat. Photonics 2023 175, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 386–392, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41566-023-01189- x

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    Electromagnetic-Dual Metasurfaces for Topological States along a 1D Interface,

    D. J. Bisharat and D. F. Sievenpiper, “Electromagnetic-Dual Metasurfaces for Topological States along a 1D Interface,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 13, no. 10, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1002/lpor.201900126

    2019 doi

  48. [57]

    Tutorial: Computing Topological Invariants in 2D Photonic Crystals,

    M. Blanco de Paz et al., “Tutorial: Computing Topological Invariants in 2D Photonic Crystals,” Adv. Quantum Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1002/qute.201900117

    2020 doi

  49. [58]

    Nanomechanical topological insulators with an auxiliary orbital degree of freedom,

    J. Ma, X. Xi, Y. Li, and X. Sun, “Nanomechanical topological insulators with an auxiliary orbital degree of freedom,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 576–583, May 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00868-6

    2021 doi

  50. [59]

    Hybrid topological photonic crystals,

    Y. Wang et al., “Hybrid topological photonic crystals,” Nat. Commun. 2023 141, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40172-6

    2023 doi

  51. [60]

    Topological slow light waveguide in photonic valley -locked heterostructures,

    W. Zheng and Y. Wang, “Topological slow light waveguide in photonic valley -locked heterostructures,” Phys. Scr., vol. 98, no. 6, p. 065508, May 2023, doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ACD0DD

    2023 doi

  52. [61]

    Frequency-dependent selectively oriented edge state topological transport,

    J. Ma et al., “Frequency-dependent selectively oriented edge state topological transport,” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2024, doi: 10.1117/1.APN.3.3.036004

    2024 doi

  53. [62]

    Harnessing Anti-Parity-Time Phase Transition in Coupled Topological Photonic Valley Waveguides,

    X. Xie et al., “Harnessing Anti-Parity-Time Phase Transition in Coupled Topological Photonic Valley Waveguides,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 33, no. 38, p. 2302197, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1002/ADFM.202302197

    2023 doi

  54. [63]

    Enabling High-Speed Computing with Electromagnetic Pulse Switching,

    A. Yakovlev and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Enabling High-Speed Computing with Electromagnetic Pulse Switching,” Adv. Mater. Technol., vol. 5, no. 12, p. 2000796, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202000796

    2020 doi

  55. [64]

    Approximate analog computing with metatronic circuits,

    M. Miscuglio et al., “Approximate analog computing with metatronic circuits,” Commun. Phys., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 196, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s42005-021-00683-4

    2021 doi

  56. [65]

    Amplitude-Controlled Electromagnetic Pulse Switching Using Waveguide Junctions for High-Speed Computing Processes,

    R. G. MacDonald, A. Yakovlev, and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Amplitude-Controlled Electromagnetic Pulse Switching Using Waveguide Junctions for High-Speed Computing Processes,” Adv. Intell. Syst., vol. 4, no. 12, p. 2200137, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1002/AISY.202200137

    2022 doi

  57. [66]

    Solving partial differential equations with waveguide-based metatronic networks,

    R. G. MacDonald, A. Yakovlev, and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Solving partial differential equations with waveguide-based metatronic networks,” Adv. Photonics Nexus, vol. 3, no. 05, p. 056007, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1117/1.APN.3.5.056007

    2024 doi

  58. [67]

    Time derivatives via interconnected waveguides,

    R. Glyn MacDonald, A. Yakovlev, and V. Pacheco-Peña, “Time derivatives via interconnected waveguides,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 13126, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40046-3

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    Inverse design of digital nanophotonic devices using the adjoint method,

    K. Wang, X. Ren, W. Chang, L. Lu, D. Liu, and A. M. Zhang, “Inverse design of digital nanophotonic devices using the adjoint method,” Photonics Res. Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 528-533, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 528–533, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.383887

    2020 doi

  60. [69]

    Inverse-designed metastructures that solve equations,

    N. M. Estakhri, B. Edwards, and N. Engheta, “Inverse-designed metastructures that solve equations,” Science (80-. )., vol. 363, no. 6433, pp. 1333–1338, 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2498

    2019 doi

  61. [70]

    Meta-optics for spatial optical analog computing,

    S. Abdollahramezani, O. Hemmatyar, and A. Adibi, “Meta-optics for spatial optical analog computing,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 4075–4095, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0285

    2020 doi

  62. [71]

    Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core,

    J. Feldmann et al., “Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core,” Nat. 2020 5897840, vol. 589, no. 7840, pp. 52–58, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03070-1

    2020 doi

  63. [72]

    Topological analog signal processing,

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad and R. Fleury, “Topological analog signal processing,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10086-3

    2019 doi

  64. [73]

    Induced homomorphism: Kirchhoff’s law in photonics,

    S. Sun et al., “Induced homomorphism: Kirchhoff’s law in photonics,” Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1711–1721, 2021, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0655

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    Refractive index of silicon and germanium and its wavelength and temperature derivatives,

    H. H. Li, “Refractive index of silicon and germanium and its wavelength and temperature derivatives,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 561–658, Jul. 1980, doi: 10.1063/1.555624

    1980 doi

  66. [75]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic crystals: Molding the flow of light. Princeton University Press, 2011

    2011

  67. [76]

    Valley-contrasting physics in all-dielectric photonic crystals: Orbital angular momentum and topological propagation,

    X.-D. Chen, F.-L. Zhao, M. Chen, and J.-W. Dong, “Valley-contrasting physics in all-dielectric photonic crystals: Orbital angular momentum and topological propagation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, no. 2, p. 20202, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.020202

    2017 doi

  68. [77]

    Single-mode topological valley-Hall lasing controlled by the degree of asymmetry at telecommunication wavelength,

    W. Noh et al., “Single-mode topological valley-Hall lasing controlled by the degree of asymmetry at telecommunication wavelength,” Opt. InfoBase Conf. Pap., vol. 45, no. 15, pp. 4108–4111, 2021

    2021

  69. [78]

    Dispersion tuning and route reconfiguration of acoustic waves in valley topological phononic crystals,

    Z. Tian et al., “Dispersion tuning and route reconfiguration of acoustic waves in valley topological phononic crystals,” Nat. Commun. 2020 111, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020- 14553-0

    2020 doi

  70. [79]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave engineering, 4th ed.. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2012

    2012

  71. [80]

    Computing with Square Electromagnetic Pulses,

    V. Pacheco-Peña and A. Yakovlev, “Computing with Square Electromagnetic Pulses,” in Handbook of Unconventional Computing, 2021, pp. 465–492. doi: 10.1142/9789811235740_0016

    2021 doi

  72. [81]

    Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method,

    A. F. Oskooi, D. Roundy, M. Ibanescu, P. Bermel, J. D. Joannopoulos, and S. G. Johnson, “Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method,” Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 687–702, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.CPC.2009.11.008

    2010 doi

  73. [82]

    Block - iterative frequency-domain methods for Maxwell’s equations in a planewave basis,

    S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, R. D. Meade, A. M. Rappe, K. D. Brommer, and O. L. Alerhand, “Block - iterative frequency-domain methods for Maxwell’s equations in a planewave basis,” Opt. Express, Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 173-190, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 173–190, Jan. 2001, doi: 10...

    2001 doi

  74. [83]

    The failure of perfectly matched layers, and towards their redemption by adiabatic absorbers,

    A. F. Oskooi, L. Zhang, Y. Avniel, and S. G. Johnson, “The failure of perfectly matched layers, and towards their redemption by adiabatic absorbers,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, no. 15, p. 11376, 2008, doi: 10.1364/oe.16.011376

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.