Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Mon R2: A Hub-Filament System with an Infrared Bubble at the Hub center

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mon R2 is a hub-filament system that has evolved from an infrared-quiet to an infrared-bright state, with a mirrored B-shaped gas feature expanding at about 2.25 km/s.

desk verdict Solid new ALMA views of the Mon R2 hub, but the expansion-velocity claim is thinner than the abstract suggests and needs a careful kinematic re-analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02628 v1 pith:U4DJJAK2 submitted 2024-12-03 astro-ph.GA

L. K. Dewangan , N. K. Bhadari , A. K. Maity , O. R. Jadhav , Saurabh Sharma , A. Haj Ismail This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starformationhub-filamentsystemMonR2infraredbubblephoton-dominatedregionALMAobservationsmolecularringmassivestars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the Mon R2 hub-filament system, a nearby stellar nursery, has evolved from a quiet infrared state into a bright one because gas falling in along filaments now meets the outward push of massive newborn stars. Using ALMA observations, the authors identify a molecular ring that wraps an infrared ring and an ionized bubble, with a mirrored B-shaped structure in HNC(3-2) emission that they interpret as gas expanding at about 2.25 km s$^{-1}$. If the interpretation holds, Mon R2 becomes a concrete example of how accretion and feedback jointly shape hub-filament systems, and where the transition between the two regimes can be observed in one object.

What carries the argument

The central object is the mirrored B-shaped feature seen in ALMA HNC(3-2) emission: a letter-B-shaped intensity pattern with two lobes on one side and a base segment on the other, extending across about $\sim$19000 AU by 39000 AU on the eastern part of the molecular ring. The argument is carried by position-velocity (PV) and position-position-velocity (PPV) diagrams: the outer part of the B is associated with gas at 12.16 km s$^{-1}$ while the base contains gas at 9.94 km s$^{-1}$ and 10.68 km s$^{-1}$, and the PV cuts show braid-like sub-structures and a circular velocity feature. These patterns are read as an expanding shell seen in projection, with the expansion speed computed from the maximum redshifted and blueshifted components.

What would settle it

A position-velocity cut through the center of the mirrored B feature should show a continuous velocity ellipse with the 9.94 and 12.16 km s$^{-1}$ lobes on opposite sides of the same structure; observing instead that these two velocity components have independent spatial peaks with no connecting velocity gradient, or that a different dense-gas tracer such as C18O shows no corresponding split, would rule out the expanding-shell interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Mon R2 is a hub-filament system caught in the act of transitioning from an IR-quiet to an IR-bright phase: molecular filaments still accrete gas onto a central hub, but massive stars (IRS 1 and IRS 2) have already created an H II region whose feedback is pushing the surrounding molecular material outward. The new, high-resolution ALMA data reveal, for the first time, a molecular ring (about $0.18$ pc by $0.26$ pc) that encircles the previously known infrared ring and a small dust shell (about $0.04$ pc by $0.07$ pc, roughly $7\,M_\odot$) hosting IRS 1. The most specific observable supporting the expansion is a mirrored B-shaped HNC(3-2) feature extending about $\sim$19000 AU by 39000 AU on the eastern side of the molecular ring, whose redshifted (12.16 km s$^{-1}$) and blueshifted (9.94 km s$^{-1}$) lobes bracket a velocity that implies expansion at about 2.25 km s$^{-1}$. The paper proposes that the ring-like morphology and the gap between the molecular and infrared rings are the result of massive-star feedback, with measured feedback pressures between $10^{-8}$ and $10^{-10}$ dynes cm$^{-2}$ exceeding typical cloud pressure.

Load-bearing premise

The expansion interpretation rests on the assumption that the redshifted and blueshifted HNC(3-2) velocities on opposite sides of the mirrored B feature are two parts of one coherent expanding shell, rather than unrelated gas parcels along the line of sight; if they are unrelated, the derived 2.25 km s$^{-1}$ expansion speed and the feedback-driven picture would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mon R2 becomes a single-object testbed for the transition between accretion-dominated and feedback-dominated hub evolution, with the molecular ring marking the current balance point.
  • The observed gap between the molecular ring and the infrared ring argues against a simple collect-and-collapse triggering scenario for this bubble, because the dense gas is separated from the ionized gas by a photon-dominated region layer.
  • Braid-like sub-structures in both velocity components of the HNC(3-2) emission imply that photon-dominated region instabilities are common on roughly 1000 AU scales around massive stars.
  • The one-sided dust shell around IRS 1, half radio-bright and half molecular, shows that feedback from a single B0 star can create an asymmetric cavity on sub-0.1 pc scales while accretion continues on the other side.
  • Feedback pressure from the H II region dominates over radiation and wind pressure out to 1 pc, so models of hub dispersal should treat ionized-gas pressure as the primary driver.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to search for the same mirrored B signature in a lower-opacity tracer such as C18O at comparable resolution; the paper sees the expansion only in PDR tracers, so an independent kinematic tracer would confirm the shell.
  • If the expansion is real, the 2.25 km s$^{-1}$ speed is slow compared with typical H II region expansion, which would imply the shell is being confined or braked by continued accretion, something the current resolution cannot directly measure.
  • The IR-dark-to-IR-bright comparison suggests an evolutionary sequence among hub-filament systems; one prediction is that younger systems will show the same molecular ring and infalling filaments but no B-shaped expansion, while older systems will show a larger, more disrupted hub.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength, multi-scale study of the Mon R2 hub-filament system (HFS) using ALMA band-3 and band-6 molecular lines and continuum, together with VLA, HST, SHARC-II, and UKIDSS archival data. The authors report a spiral-like dust structure, a molecular ring surrounding an infrared ring, a mirrored B-shaped HNC(3-2) feature east of the ring, and a small-scale dust shell hosting IRS 1. They interpret the B-shaped feature as an expanding structure with a velocity of about 2.25 km/s, interpret braid-like PV substructures as PDR instability, and argue from pressure calculations that feedback from IRS 1 and IRS 2 shaped the rings. The overarching claim is that Mon R2 evolved from an IR-quiet to an IR-bright HFS through the interplay of gas accretion and massive-star feedback.

Significance. If the quantitative expansion and evolutionary interpretation is upheld, the paper would provide a well-observed example of feedback shaping a hub-filament system and would be a useful addition to the HFS literature. The morphological inventory, the ALMA continuum source catalog in Table A2, the SHARC-II clump masses in Table A1, and the public-data-based pressure comparison in Appendix A are reproducible and will be of value independent of the expansion-speed claim. The paper also explicitly acknowledges several limitations, including the constant-temperature assumption in mass estimates and the absence of molecular emission over part of the dust shell. However, the most specific quantitative claim in the abstract, the 2.25 km/s expansion, currently rests on a small number of selected channel velocities without reported uncertainties or a kinematic fit, and the PDR-instability inference is not backed by a model fit. These issues need to be addressed before the central evolutionary narrative can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2.1, Figure 7d-e] The expansion velocity of ~2.25 km/s is computed from the selected HNC(3-2) velocity channels at 12.16 and 9.94 km/s. The half-difference of these two values is 1.11 km/s, not 2.25 km/s; the quoted number equals the full velocity difference. The paper does not report the spectral resolution or channel width of the ALMA band-6 data, does not give centroid uncertainties for the two channels, and does not show a Gaussian decomposition of the average spectrum in Figure 7e. The text says the value is based on 'the maximum redshifted and blueshifted velocity components in the PV diagram', but the measurement appears to be taken from channel maps, not from a fit to the PV diagram. If the 12.16 and 9.94 km/s components trace distinct line-of-sight features, the expansion interpretation loses its quantitative anchor. Please re-derive the expansion velocity from a proper kinematic decomposition with uncertainties, or remove the quantitative value and state the expansion interpretation qualitatively.
  2. [Section 4.2.1, Section 3.4.3] The braid-like substructures in the PV diagrams are interpreted as 'strongly suggesting instability in photon-dominated regions', but no instability model or quantitative criterion is applied to the data. The observed velocity oscillations and the multiple 10-11 km/s components along the base of the B feature (Section 3.4.3) show that the region is kinematically confused, and the absence of these braid-like features in the H13CN PV diagrams (Figures 9c and 9d) weakens the case that they trace a single coherent PDR surface. Please either fit a physically motivated expanding-shell or instability model to the PV/PPV data, or soften the claim to say the substructures are consistent with PDR instability rather than that they strongly suggest it.
  3. [Section 3.6, Section 4.1, Figure 12b] The anticorrelation between the radial distributions of N(H2) and Vlsr is described as 'one of the important results of this paper' and is used to infer inflowing material along low-column-density filaments. However, the radial profiles are azimuthally averaged around IRS 2 over a region with strong spatial gradients and a gas deficit in the red zone, and no quantitative correlation coefficient, significance level, or uncertainty is given. Rotation, projection effects, or expansion could also produce a similar radial velocity pattern. Please provide a quantitative measure of the anticorrelation and its significance, or reframe the statement as a qualitative suggestion rather than an important quantitative result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2] Please report the spectral resolution and channel width of the ALMA HNC(3-2), H13CN(3-2), CCH, C18O, and CS observations; this information is necessary to assess whether the velocity peaks discussed in Section 3.4.2 are resolved.
  2. [Figure 7e] The average HNC(3-2) spectrum in Figure 7e should have clearly labeled velocity axes and the selected channels at 12.16 and 9.94 km/s should be marked, so the reader can verify the peak velocities and the absence of additional components.
  3. [Appendix A] The pressure calculation uses Lbol = 2.5e4 Lsun for the B0 ZAMS star, while Section 1 quotes a luminosity of about 2000 Lsun for IRS 1 from Hackwell et al. (1982). Please clarify the origin of the adopted bolometric luminosity and discuss how the pressure values would change if the lower observed luminosity were used.
  4. [Section 3.6] The radial profiles in Figure 12b are smoothed 'to get rid of sharp intensity variations'; please specify the smoothing scale and show the unsmoothed profiles or quantify how the smoothing affects the claimed anticorrelation.
  5. [Section 3.4.3] The SCOUSEPY PPV decomposition is described, but the number of fitted Gaussian components per spectral averaging area, the fit residuals, and the criteria for accepting a multi-component fit are not reported. Please provide fit-quality statistics or example fits.
  6. [General] There are several typos and missing words, including 'daigrams' in Section 3.4.2, 'respctively' in Section 3.4.3, 'blueshfited' in Section 4.2.1, 'emcompasses' in Section 3.4.2, and 'metioned' in Section 3.3. A careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analysis is observational, uses standard radiative-transfer and pressure formulae with literature parameters, and the 'predictions' are direct measurements or interpretations rather than fitted inputs recycled as outputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not contain a step in which an input is defined in terms of the output or a fitted parameter is later presented as a prediction. Masses and column densities are computed with standard formulas (e.g., Hildebrand 1983; Mangum & Shirley 2015) using literature values for distance, opacity, abundance ratio, and temperature; none of these quantities is fitted to the quantity it is used to predict. The 2.25 km/s expansion speed is obtained by taking the difference between two selected HNC(3-2) velocity channels (12.16 and 9.94 km/s) and halving it; this is a direct measurement of a velocity separation, not a model parameter whose value is then used to claim its own existence. Whether the two channels trace a single expanding shell rather than unrelated line-of-sight gas is a physical-interpretation assumption, which is a correctness risk, not a circularity. Self-citations appear in two places: Dewangan et al. (2023) is cited for the morphological interpretation of intertwined substructures in NGC 3324 as PDR instability, and Dewangan et al. (2024) is cited for the SCOUSEPY tool and for the G11P1-HFS comparison. These citations provide external comparative and methodological context; the present HNC(3-2) substructures and velocity maps are new data, and the cited works are not used as an unverified premise that forces the conclusion. The IR-quiet-to-IR-bright classification is an evolutionary interpretation of observed dark NIR areas, embedded sources, and the UCH II region, not a definitional tautology. No circular step can be quoted from the paper that reduces a derived claim to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All assumptions are conventional for observational star formation studies. No new physics is introduced. The most consequential assumptions are the constant temperature and opacity for mass estimates and the interpretation of velocity structure as expansion.

free parameters (8)
  • Dust temperature (T_D) = 23 K inner; 18.5 K outer
    Adopted from Herschel temperature map (Didelon et al. 2015); used to convert fluxes to masses; uncertainty up to 50%.
  • Distance (D) = 830 pc
    Adopted from Racine (1968) and Herbst & Racine (1976); affects all physical sizes and masses.
  • Dust opacity (kappa_nu) = 1.01 cm2/g at 350 um; 1.14 cm2/g at 1.14 mm
    Adopted from Ossenkopf & Henning (1994) and Enoch et al. (2008).
  • Gas-to-dust ratio (R_t) = 100
    Standard assumption in the mass equation (Equation 1).
  • N(C18O)/N(H2) ratio = 1.7e-7
    From Frerking et al. (1982); used to convert C18O column density to H2 column density.
  • Excitation temperature for C18O = 23 K (main map)
    Assumed equal to dust temperature; dividing by 1.15 gives the 18.5 K version.
  • Lyman continuum photon rate (N_UV) = 2.29e47 photons/s
    From Panagia (1973) for a B0 ZAMS star; used in the pressure calculation.
  • Bolometric luminosity (L_bol) = 2.5e4 Lsun
    Adopted from Panagia (1973) for the pressure computation.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math C18O(1-0) and CS(2-1) line emission is optically thin and the gas is in LTE, so standard radiative transfer applies.
    Section 3.2: 'Assuming that the emission is optically thin and the gas is in local thermodynamic equilibrium.'
  • domain assumption The excitation temperature of C18O equals the dust temperature.
    Section 3.2: 'The dust temperature was employed as a proxy for the C18O excitation temperature.' This affects N(H2) by about 15 percent.
  • domain assumption HNC(3-2), CCH(3-2) and CCH(4-3) trace the photon-dominated region, while H13CN traces dense gas.
    Section 3.4.1 describes these lines as PDR and dense gas tracers.
  • domain assumption The maximum redshifted and blueshifted velocity components in the HNC(3-2) PV diagram represent coherent expansion of the molecular gas.
    Section 4.2.1: 'On the basis of the maximum redshifted and blueshifted velocity components in the PV diagram, we compute an expansion velocity of ~2.25 km/s.' This is the weakest link.
  • domain assumption IRS 1 is a B0 ZAMS star with known Lyman continuum and luminosity from Panagia (1973).
    Appendix A uses N_UV = 2.29e47 photons/s and L_bol = 2.5e4 Lsun for the pressure calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mon R2: A Hub-Filament System with an Infrared Bubble at the Hub center." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U4DJJAK2

@misc{pith2026241202628,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mon R2: A Hub-Filament System with an Infrared Bubble at the Hub center},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U4DJJAK2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02628}
}
abstract

A multi-wavelength, multi-scale study of the Mon R2 hub-filament system (HFS) reveals a spiral structure, with the central hub containing more mass than its filaments. ALMA C$^{18}$O(1-0) emission reveals several accreting filaments connected to a molecular ring (size $\sim$0.18 pc $\times$ 0.26 pc). The molecular ring surrounds the infrared (IR) ring (size $\sim$0.12 pc $\times$ 0.16 pc), which is not usually observed. The IR ring encircles IR dark regions and a population of embedded near-IR sources, including the massive stars IRS 1 and IRS 2. ALMA HNC(3-2) line data reveal a mirrored B-shaped feature (extent $\sim$19000 AU $\times$ 39000 AU) toward the eastern part of the molecular ring, suggesting expansion at $\sim$2.25 km s$^{-1}$. Distinct HNC sub-structures in both redshifted and blueshifted velocity components are investigated toward the B-shaped feature. The presence of these braid-like substructures in each velocity component strongly suggests instability in photon-dominated regions. A dusty shell-like feature (extent $\sim$0.04 pc $\times$ 0.07 pc; mass $\sim$7 M$_{\odot}$) hosting IRS 1 is identified in the ALMA 1.14 mm continuum map, centered toward the base of the B-shaped feature. The IR and dense molecular rings are likely shaped by feedback from massive stars, driven by high pressure values between 10$^{-8}$-10$^{-10}$ dynes cm$^{-2}$, observed within a 1 pc range of the B0 ZAMS star powering the ultracompact HII region. Overall, these outcomes support that the Mon R2 HFS transitioned from IR-quiet to IR-bright, driven by the interaction between gas accretion and feedback from massive stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02628 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) The UKIDSS K-band image overlaid with the NVAS radio continuum emission contours at 4.8 GHz. The radio contours are shown with the levels of 5, 15, 20, 24, 50, and 85 mJy beam−1 . The inset on the bottom right exhibits the area containing the NVAS 4.8 GHz continuum emission. The thick curves (in pale green) show the arc-like features. The solid box highlights the area covered by the ALMA band-6 observations, whil… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) The panel shows the ALMA C18O(1–0) moment-0 map at [8, 13] km s−1 . b) The panel presents the N(H2) map derived using the ALMA C18O(1–0) emission, with the N(H2) contour level of 1.2 × 1020 cm−2 . c) The panel displays the ALMA C18O(1–0) moment-1 map. d) The panel shows the zoomed-in ALMA C18O(1–0) moment-1 map (see the solid box in Figure 2c). The map is also overlaid with contours (in orange) of the HST/NICMOS2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) The panel shows the ALMA CS(2-1) moment-0 map at [5, 14] km s−1 . The molecular ring morphology, visible in the ALMA C18O(1–0) and CS(2-1) moment-0 maps, is outlined by a magenta curve based on visual inspection. The dashed curve highlights the connection between molecular filaments and molecular ring. b) The panel presents the ALMA CS(2-1) moment-1 map. PV diagram of the c) ALMA C18O(1–0); d) ALMA CS(2-1) emissi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) ALMA 1.14 mm dust continuum map (see the solid box in Figure 1a). b) The panel displays a two-color composite map produced using the ALMA 1.14 mm dust continuum map (in red) and the HST/NICMOS2 F207M band image (in cyan). c) The panel shows a clumpfind decomposition…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) Clumpfind decomposition of the ALMA 1.14 mm dust continuum emission (see the dot-dashed box in Fig￾ure 4b), displaying the spatial extension of at least five con￾tinuum sources (i.e., r1, r2, r3, r4, and r5; see Figure 4c and also Table A2). b) Two-color composite m…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a–d) Moment-0 maps and (e–h) moment-1 maps of ALMA HNC(3–2), H13CN(3–2), CCH(3–2), and CCH(4– 3) emission, respectively. In each panel, diamonds are the same as in Figure 1a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a) The panel displays a three-color composite map produced using the ALMA 1.14 mm dust continuum map (in red), the HNC(3–2) moment-0 map (in green), and the UKIDSS K-band image (in blue). The dot-dashed curve shows the location of IR ring traced in the HST/NICMOS2 F207…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of dust and molecular emissions in the direction of an area highlighted by the solid box in Figure 1d. a) The panel shows the ALMA 1.14 mm dust continuum map and the 1.14 mm continuum emission contour at 0.45 mJy beam−1 . Integrated intensity map (at Vlsr …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: PV diagram of the a) HNC(3–2); c)H13CN(3–2) emission along the path “s1”. PV diagram of the b) HNC(3– 2); d)H13CN(3–2) emission along the path “s2”. e–h) PV diagrams of the HNC(3–2) along the paths“g1–g4”. All these paths are indicated by dot-dashed lines in Figure 6a.…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: PPV maps of a) ALMA HNC(3–2) and b) ALMA C18O(1-0) in the direction of an area shown in Figures 8b and 8d. The PPV maps are produced using the tool SCOUSEPY. Mon R2 −Ionized emission (in blue) −Mirrored B structure (in spring green) −Infrared ring (in red) −Molecular …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: a presents the N(H2) map overlaid with a cir￾cular boundary of ∼0.3 pc radius, where the radial dis￾tributions of N(H2) and Vlsr are examined and shown in Figure 12b. The radial profiles represent azimuthally averaged values calculated for each one-pixel wide circu￾la…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST-ALMA Study of a Hub-Filament System in the Nascent Phase

    astro-ph.GA 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ALMA N2H+ data confirm G11P1-HFS as a small-scale nascent hub-filament system whose gas flows are aligned with gravity along the filaments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2019

  4. [4]

    R., Oppenheimer , B., Dougados , C., & Carpenter , J

    Andersen , M., Meyer , M. R., Oppenheimer , B., Dougados , C., & Carpenter , J. 2006, , 132, 2296, 10.1086/508485

    work page doi:10.1086/508485 2006

  5. [5]

    G., Borkin , M

    Arce , H. G., Borkin , M. A., Goodman , A. A., Pineda , J. E., & Beaumont , C. N. 2011, , 742, 105, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/105

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/105 2011

  6. [6]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  7. [7]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  8. [8]

    2010, , 721, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/137

    Bally , J., Aguirre , J., Battersby , C., et al. 2010, , 721, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/137

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/137 2010

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    J., I., Becklin , E

    Beckwith , S., Evans , N. J., I., Becklin , E. E., & Neugebauer , G. 1976, , 208, 390, 10.1086/154618

    1976 doi

  2. [10]

    R., et al

    Bern \'e , O., Fuente , A., Goicoechea , J. R., et al. 2009, , 706, L160, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L160

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    K., Dewangan , L

    Bhadari , N. K., Dewangan , L. K., Pirogov , L. E., et al. 2023, , 526, 4402, 10.1093/mnras/stad2981

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    G., W \"u nsch , R., Whitworth , A

    Bisbas , T. G., W \"u nsch , R., Whitworth , A. P., & Hubber , D. A. 2009, , 497, 649, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811522

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Bate , M

    Bonnell , I. A., Bate , M. R., Clarke , C. J., & Pringle , J. E. 2001, , 323, 785, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04270.x

    2001

  6. [14]

    A., Vine , S

    Bonnell , I. A., Vine , S. G., & Bate , M. R. 2004, , 349, 735, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07543.x

    2004

  7. [15]

    Boonman , A. M. S., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2003, , 403, 1003, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030364

    2003 doi

  8. [16]

    2012, , 758, L28, 10.1088/2041-8205/758/2/L28

    Bressert , E., Ginsburg , A., Bally , J., et al. 2012, , 758, L28, 10.1088/2041-8205/758/2/L28

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    G., & Hartigan , P

    Carlsten , S. G., & Hartigan , P. M. 2018, , 869, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb8d

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    M., & Hodapp , K

    Carpenter , J. M., & Hodapp , K. W. 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I, ed. B. Reipurth , Vol. 4, 899, 10.48550/arXiv.0809.1396

    2008 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    M., Meyer , M

    Carpenter , J. M., Meyer , M. R., Dougados , C., Strom , S. E., & Hillenbrand , L. A. 1997, , 114, 198, 10.1086/118465

    1997 doi

  12. [20]

    S., Allen , D., et al

    Churchwell , E., Povich , M. S., Allen , D., et al. 2006, , 649, 759, 10.1086/507015

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    F., Povich , M

    Churchwell , E., Watson , D. F., Povich , M. S., et al. 2007, , 670, 428, 10.1086/521646

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    H., Sjouwerman , L

    Crossley , J. H., Sjouwerman , L. O., Fomalont , E. B., & Radziwill , N. M. 2007, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 211, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 132.03

    2007

  15. [23]

    J., Hoare , M

    de Wit , W. J., Hoare , M. G., Fujiyoshi , T., et al. 2009, , 494, 157, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810771

    2009 doi

  16. [24]

    2003, , 408, L25, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031157

    Deharveng , L., Lefloch , B., Zavagno , A., et al. 2003, , 408, L25, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031157

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    D., et al

    Deharveng , L., Schuller , F., Anderson , L. D., et al. 2010, , 523, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014422

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    K., Bhadari , N

    Dewangan , L. K., Bhadari , N. K., Maity , A. K., et al. 2024, , 527, 5895, 10.1093/mnras/stad3384

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    K., Dhanya , J

    Dewangan , L. K., Dhanya , J. S., Bhadari , N. K., Ojha , D. K., & Baug , T. 2021, , 506, 6081, 10.1093/mnras/stab2137

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    K., Maity , A

    Dewangan , L. K., Maity , A. K., Mayya , Y. D., et al. 2023, , 958, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad004b

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    K., Ojha , D

    Dewangan , L. K., Ojha , D. K., Luna , A., et al. 2016, , 819, 66, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/66

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    K., Ojha , D

    Dewangan , L. K., Ojha , D. K., Zinchenko , I., Janardhan , P., & Luna , A. 2017, , 834, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/22

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    K., Pirogov , L

    Dewangan , L. K., Pirogov , L. E., Ryabukhina , O. L., Ojha , D. K., & Zinchenko , I. 2019, , 877, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1aa6

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    2015, , 584, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526239

    Didelon , P., Motte , F., Tremblin , P., et al. 2015, , 584, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526239

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    M., & Zhang , Q

    Dierickx , M., Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Rivilla , V. M., & Zhang , Q. 2015, , 803, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/89

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    M., & Johansson , L

    Downes , D., Winnberg , A., Goss , W. M., & Johansson , L. E. B. 1975, , 44, 243

    1975

  27. [35]

    E., & Williams , D

    Dyson , J. E., & Williams , D. A. 1980, Physics of the interstellar medium (New York, Halsted Press), 204

    1980

  28. [36]

    L., Evans , Neal J., I., Sargent , A

    Enoch , M. L., Evans , Neal J., I., Sargent , A. I., et al. 2008, , 684, 1240, 10.1086/589963

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Langer , W

    Frerking , M. A., Langer , W. D., & Wilson , R. W. 1982, , 262, 590, 10.1086/160451

    1982 doi

  30. [38]

    P., Alonso-Albi , T., et al

    Fuente , A., Trevi \ n o-Morales , S. P., Alonso-Albi , T., et al. 2021, , 507, 1886, 10.1093/mnras/stab2216

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    2010, , 521, L23, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015093

    Fuente , A., Bern \'e , O., Cernicharo , J., et al. 2010, , 521, L23, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015093

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    2012, , 543, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118347

    Ginard , D., Gonz \'a lez-Garc \' a , M., Fuente , A., et al. 2012, , 543, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118347

    2012 doi

  33. [41]

    R., Pety , J., Cuadrado , S., et al

    Goicoechea , J. R., Pety , J., Cuadrado , S., et al. 2016, , 537, 207, 10.1038/nature18957

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    A., Grasdalen , G

    Hackwell , J. A., Grasdalen , G. L., & Gehrz , R. D. 1982, , 252, 250, 10.1086/159552

    1982 doi

  35. [43]

    1992, , 263, 285

    Henning , T., Chini , R., & Pfau , W. 1992, , 263, 285

    1992

  36. [44]

    D., Longmore , S

    Henshaw , J. D., Longmore , S. N., Kruijssen , J. M. D., et al. 2016, , 457, 2675, 10.1093/mnras/stw121

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    D., Ginsburg , A., Haworth , T

    Henshaw , J. D., Ginsburg , A., Haworth , T. J., et al. 2019, , 485, 2457, 10.1093/mnras/stz471

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    1976, , 81, 840, 10.1086/111963

    Herbst , W., & Racine , R. 1976, , 81, 840, 10.1086/111963

    1976 doi

  39. [47]

    Hildebrand , R. H. 1983, , 24, 267

    1983

  40. [48]

    Hunter , J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  41. [49]

    2022, , 941, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac99e0

    Hwang , J., Kim , J., Pattle , K., et al. 2022, , 941, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac99e0

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., B \'a ez-Rubio , A., Mart \' n-Pintado , J., Zhang , Q., & Rivilla , V. M. 2020, , 897, L33, 10.3847/2041-8213/aba050

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    M., et al

    Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., B \'a ez-Rubio , A., Rivilla , V. M., et al. 2013, , 764, L4, 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L4

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Chick , W

    Kobulnicky , H. A., Chick , W. T., & Povich , M. S. 2019, , 158, 73, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab2716

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Arzoumanian , D., Men'shchikov , A., et al. 2022, , 658, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140363

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Palmeirim , P., Arzoumanian , D., & Inutsuka , S. I. 2020, , 642, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038232

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    1997, , 489, 284, 10.1086/304773

    Kwan , J. 1997, , 489, 284, 10.1086/304773

    1997 doi

  48. [56]

    H., Nagata , T., & Kusakabe , N

    Kwon , J., Tamura , M., Hough , J. H., Nagata , T., & Kusakabe , N. 2016, , 152, 67, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/67

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    J., Almaini , O., et al

    Lawrence , A., Warren , S. J., Almaini , O., et al. 2007, , 379, 1599, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    2007

  50. [58]

    2023, , 522, 3719, 10.1093/mnras/stad047

    Liu , H.-L., Tej , A., Liu , T., et al. 2023, , 522, 3719, 10.1093/mnras/stad047

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    K., Inoue , T., Fukui , Y., et al

    Maity , A. K., Inoue , T., Fukui , Y., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.06826, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.06826

    2024 doi arXiv

  52. [60]

    G., & Shirley , Y

    Mangum , J. G., & Shirley , Y. L. 2015, , 127, 266, 10.1086/680323

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    1985, , 152, 387

    Massi , M., Felli , M., & Simon , M. 1985, , 152, 387

    1985

  54. [62]

    L., et al

    Merello , M., Evans , Neal J., I., Shirley , Y. L., et al. 2015, , 218, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/218/1/1

    2015 doi

  55. [63]

    2018, , 56, 41, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    Motte , F., Bontemps , S., & Louvet , F. 2018, , 56, 41, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    Myers , P. C. 2009, , 700, 1609, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1609

    2009 doi

  57. [65]

    1994, , 291, 943

    Ossenkopf , V., & Henning , T. 1994, , 291, 943

    1994

  58. [66]

    2020, , 900, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

    Padoan , P., Pan , L., Juvela , M., Haugb lle , T., & Nordlund , A . 2020, , 900, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    1973, , 78, 929, 10.1086/111498

    Panagia , N. 1973, , 78, 929, 10.1086/111498

    1973 doi

  60. [68]

    2012, , 544, A110, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118481

    Pilleri , P., Fuente , A., Cernicharo , J., et al. 2012, , 544, A110, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118481

    2012 doi

  61. [69]

    2013, , 554, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220795

    Pilleri , P., Trevi \ n o-Morales , S., Fuente , A., et al. 2013, , 554, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220795

    2013 doi

  62. [70]

    2014, , 561, A69, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322638

    Pilleri , P., Fuente , A., Gerin , M., et al. 2014, , 561, A69, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322638

    2014 doi

  63. [71]

    1968, , 73, 233, 10.1086/110624

    Racine , R. 1968, , 73, 233, 10.1086/110624

    1968 doi

  64. [72]

    Rayner , T. S. M., Griffin , M. J., Schneider , N., et al. 2017, , 607, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630039

    2017 doi

  65. [73]

    L., Offner , S

    Rosen , A. L., Offner , S. S. R., Sadavoy , S. I., et al. 2020, , 216, 62, 10.1007/s11214-020-00688-5

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    2024, , 970, L40, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6144

    Saha , A., Tej , A., Liu , H.-L., et al. 2024, , 970, L40, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6144

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    2017, , 602, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628989

    Tig \'e , J., Motte , F., Russeil , D., et al. 2017, , 602, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628989

    2017 doi

  68. [76]

    P., Fuente , A., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., et al

    Trevi \ n o-Morales , S. P., Fuente , A., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., et al. 2016, , 593, L12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628899

    2016 doi

  69. [77]

    2019, , 629, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935260

    ---. 2019, , 629, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935260

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    C., Jappsen , A

    V \'a zquez-Semadeni , E., G \'o mez , G. C., Jappsen , A. K., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., & Klessen , R. S. 2009, , 707, 1023, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1023

    2009 doi

  71. [79]

    2017, , 467, 1313, 10.1093/mnras/stw3229

    V \'a zquez-Semadeni , E., Gonz \'a lez-Samaniego , A., & Col \' n , P. 2017, , 467, 1313, 10.1093/mnras/stw3229

    2017 doi

  72. [80]

    C., & Zamora-Avil \'e s , M

    V \'a zquez-Semadeni , E., Palau , A., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., G \'o mez , G. C., & Zamora-Avil \'e s , M. 2019, , 490, 3061, 10.1093/mnras/stz2736

    2019 doi

  73. [81]

    P., de Geus , E

    Williams , J. P., de Geus , E. J., & Blitz , L. 1994, , 428, 693, 10.1086/174279

    1994 doi

  74. [82]

    G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M

    Wolfire , M. G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M. 2022, , 60, 247, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-010254

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    Wood , D. O. S., & Churchwell , E. 1989, , 69, 831, 10.1086/191329

    1989 doi

  76. [84]

    2023, , 953, 40, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42

    Yang , D., Liu , H.-L., Tej , A., et al. 2023, , 953, 40, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdf42

    2023 doi

  77. [85]

    K., et al

    Zhang , G., Li , D., Hyde , A. K., et al. 2015, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 58, 5561, 10.1007/s11433-014-5561-7

    2015 doi

  78. [86]

    J., et al

    Zhou , J.-W., Liu , T., Evans , N. J., et al. 2022, , 514, 6038, 10.1093/mnras/stac1735

    2022 doi

  79. [87]

    W., Wyrowski , F., Neupane , S., et al

    Zhou , J. W., Wyrowski , F., Neupane , S., et al. 2023, , 676, A69, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346500

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.