REVIEW 2 cited by
LLM-Enhanced Path Planning: Safe and Efficient Autonomous Navigation with Instructional Inputs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Autonomous navigation guided by natural language instructions is essential for improving human-robot interaction and enabling complex operations in dynamic environments. While large language models (LLMs) are not inherently designed for planning, they can significantly enhance planning efficiency by providing guidance and informing constraints to ensure safety. This paper introduces a planning framework that integrates LLMs with 2D occupancy grid maps and natural language commands to improve spatial reasoning and task execution in resource-limited settings. By decomposing high-level commands and real-time environmental data, the system generates structured navigation plans for pick-and-place tasks, including obstacle avoidance, goal prioritization, and adaptive behaviors. The framework dynamically recalculates paths to address environmental changes and aligns with implicit social norms for seamless human-robot interaction. Our results demonstrates the potential of LLMs to design context-aware system to enhance navigation efficiency and safety in industrial and dynamic environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Embodied Hazard Mitigation using Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Mobile Robots
A VLM+LLM pipeline on an AMR classifies anomalies as Hazardous or Conflict and triggers mitigation actions, reporting 91.2% accuracy and a 6-second average latency in small indoor trials.
-
Assessing the Value of Visual Input: A Benchmark of Multimodal Large Language Models for Robotic Path Planning
A benchmark of 15 multimodal LLMs on grid path planning reports modest success on 8x8 grids and near-failure on 20x20 grids, but its visual-vs-text comparison is confounded by prompt differences.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.