Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

$\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{C})$-character stacks and Langlands duality over finite fields

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One combinatorial sum is conjectured to compute PGL_n character-stack cohomology and to interpolate two finite-field rings, with the identity proved after Euler specialization.

desk verdict A substantial extension of the GL_n character-stack program to PGL_n, with real new content, but the displayed proof of Theorem 8.5.1 drops the character χ(y) from the H(C)-projector, so one of the two proven legs is not justified as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03234 v6 pith:QDAISU77 submitted 2024-12-04 math.RT math.AG

Emmanuel Letellier , Tommaso Scognamiglio This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.AG MSC 14D2314F2020G4020C33
keywords PGL_ncharacterstacksintersectioncohomologyofmixedPoincaréseriesLanglandsdualityoverfinitefieldssheavesorbitalcomplexesstructurecoefficientsnon-abelianFouriertransform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a closed formula for the mixed Poincaré series of the intersection cohomology of a generic $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{C})$-character stack, with coefficients in the local systems attached to $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{C})$-conjugacy classes whose stabilisers are disconnected. The formula writes the series as a finite combination of the rational functions $H_{\omega_r}(z,w)$ used in the $\mathrm{GL}_n$ theory, with combinatorial weights $\Delta_r^{s_\chi}$ encoding the local-system characters. The identity is proved after the Euler specialization $t\mapsto -1$, giving the $IE$-polynomial, and the same specialized combination is shown to be the structure coefficient of a convolution product of intersection-cohomology orbital complexes on $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ and of a pointwise product of character sheaves on $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$. If the full conjecture holds, one geometric object would interpolate between two a priori unrelated finite-group rings, which the authors describe as a non-abelian Fourier transform.

What carries the argument

The device that carries the argument is the finite Galois covering $$p:\bigsqcup_{\zeta\in I(\mathbf C)}\mathcal M_{\mathbf C(\zeta)}\to\mathcal M_{\mathbf C}$$ with Galois group $H(\mathbf C)=\{(y_1,\dots,y_k)\in\prod_i A(C_i): y_1\cdots y_k=1\}$; it expresses each local-system coefficient $E_\chi$ as the $\chi$-isotypic component of the pushforward of the constant sheaf, so the cohomology of $(\mathcal M_{\mathbf C},E_\chi)$ becomes an $H(\mathbf C)$-twisted average of cohomologies of ordinary $\mathrm{GL}_n$-character stacks. Those $\mathrm{GL}_n$ stacks are governed by the rational functions $H_\omega(z,w)$ of the $\mathrm{GL}_n$ theory, while the weights $\Delta_r^{s_\chi}$ are cyclotomic sums that record the restriction of $\chi$ to the cyclic groups $A(C_i)$. On the finite-field side, the Langlands correspondence for $(\mathrm{PGL}_n,\mathrm{SL}_n)$ matches orbital intersection-cohomology complexes on $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ with character sheaves on $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$, so the same $H_\omega$-sum appears once as a convolution structure constant and once as a pointwise-product structure constant.

What would settle it

Compute the mixed Poincaré series on both sides of Conjecture 5.5.11 for $n=2$, $k=3$, with one degenerate semisimple $\mathrm{PGL}_2$-conjugacy class, using the explicit formula (9.5.2) and a direct calculation of the weight filtration on the corresponding character stack; agreement in every $(q,t)$-coefficient would confirm the full conjecture in the first case beyond the Euler specialization, while a single mismatch would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a generic $k$-tuple $\mathbf C=(C_1,\dots,C_k)$ of $\mathrm{PGL}_n$ conjugacy classes and each character $\chi=\chi_1\boxtimes\dots\boxtimes\chi_k$ of $A(\mathbf C)=\prod_i A(C_i)$, the theorem proved after $t\mapsto -1$ is $$\operatorname{IE}(\mathcal M_{\mathbf C},E_\chi;q)=\frac{\iota(\mathbf C)}{|A(\mathbf C)|}$q^{{d_\omega}}$\sum_{r\in R_{d_1,\dots,d_k}}\$Delta_r^{{s_\chi}}$H_{\omega_r}(\sqrt q,1/\sqrt q).$$ Equivalently, this number is the convolution coefficient of the intersection-cohomology orbital complexes on $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ (Theorem 8.5.1) and, up to a normalizing factor, the pointwise-product coefficient of the corresponding character sheaves on $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ (Theorem 8.2.6). The unspecialized formula (Conjecture 5.5.11) is the only statement that would give the full mixed Hodge series, and it is reduced to the analogous $\mathrm{GL}_n$ conjecture, for which the paper cites substantial evidence. The authors read the resulting triangle as a finite-field manifestation of Langlands duality for the dual pair $(\mathrm{PGL}_n,\mathrm{SL}_n)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that intersection cohomology with weights computed over $\mathbb C$ agrees, after specializing a finite-ring model, with the corresponding computation over $\mathbb F_q$ (Theorem 2.2.5); the paper gives only a sketch of this comparison and states that it could not locate a proof in the literature, so the entire bridge from the finite-field identities to the complex $IE$-polynomials would collapse if that specialization failed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every generic $\mathbf C$ and $\chi$, the Euler-specialized polynomial $\operatorname{IE}(\mathcal M_{\mathbf C},E_\chi;q)$ is now a computable rational expression; in the $n=2$ case the paper writes it out explicitly for all local systems on degenerate semisimple classes.
  • The convolution algebra of class functions on $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ generated by IC-orbital complexes and the pointwise algebra on $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ generated by character sheaves share structure coefficients, at least for generic inputs paired with the trivial character.
  • If Conjecture 5.5.11 is correct, the full mixed Poincaré series—not just its Euler specialization—would be the common origin of both structure coefficients, with the pure-part specialization corresponding to the pointwise product on $\mathrm{SL}_n$.
  • The identity element of the convolution ring (the function $1_1$) corresponds under the stated bijection to the identity element of the pointwise ring (the trivial character of $\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$), making the dictionary genuinely one of rings with unit.
  • Because the $\mathrm{PGL}_n$ conjecture reduces to the known $\mathrm{GL}_n$ mixed-Poincaré conjecture, a proof of the latter would automatically upgrade all the finite-field structure-coefficient identities in this paper to identities of full mixed Hodge series.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The interpolation picture suggests that the mixed Hodge series of $\mathrm{PGL}_n$-character stacks could serve as a geometric origin for the structure constants of both finite-group rings, effectively a categorification of the non-abelian Fourier transform the authors invoke.
  • Extending the same reduction to non-generic conjugacy classes, as the paper says the $\mathrm{GL}_n$ case now allows, would likely replace 'generic tuple' by a level-of-genericity condition and produce conjectural formulae for all $\mathrm{PGL}_n$ character stacks, with the pure-part statement no longer tracking character multiplicities.
  • A concrete check of the $n=2$ formulas against the weight filtration computed by standard resolution methods would test the full conjecture in the first case where the Euler specialization has already been proved.
  • The $H(\mathbf C)$-action on $\mathrm{GL}_n$-stack cohomology should agree with the Weyl-group action introduced by analytic methods; proving that equality would connect the combinatorial weights to Hecke correspondences on parabolic Higgs bundles.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the mixed Poincaré series of intersection cohomology of generic PGL_n-character stacks M_C, with coefficients in local systems E^C_χ arising from PGL_n-conjugacy classes with possibly non-connected stabilizers. Its main conjecture (Conjecture 5.5.11) expresses IH_c(M_C,E^C_χ;q,t) as a finite sum of HLRV-type rational functions H_{ω_r} with explicit coefficients Δ^{s_χ}_r. The paper proves the conjecture after the Euler specialization t ↦ -1 (Theorem 5.5.10), and proves that the same specialized sum equals the structure coefficient of (i) a convolution product of orbital intersection complexes on PGL_n(F_q) (Theorem 8.5.1) and (ii) a pointwise product of Lusztig character sheaves on SL_n(F_q) (Theorem 8.2.6). These two identifications realize the announced interpolation between the based rings (C(PGL_n(F_q)), Loc, ∗) and (C(SL_n(F_q)), CS, ·). The case n = 2 is worked out explicitly, with the character-sheaf multiplicities verified directly (Section 9).

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial contribution to the arithmetic harmonic analysis of character stacks: it extends the Hausel–Letellier–Rodriguez-Villegas/Letellier program from GL_n to PGL_n in the genuinely more delicate setting of degenerate conjugacy classes (non-connected stabilizers), and it gives a geometric 'non-abelian Fourier transform' bridge between convolution on PGL_n(F_q) and pointwise multiplication on SL_n(F_q). The paper is scrupulous in separating theorems from conjectures: the full mixed Poincaré series is only conjectural (5.5.11), the Euler specialization is proved, and the two structure-coefficient theorems are derived from prior GL_n results [27, 28]. Notable strengths are the explicit derivations of Theorems 5.5.10, 8.2.6 and 8.5.1 from the cited prior work, the fully worked n = 2 verification (Theorem 9.6.2 with the explicit table of values), and the authors' candid disclosure of the unproved specialization theorem 2.2.5. The main weaknesses are (a) a missing character factor in the displayed proof of Theorem 8.5.1, and (b) the sketched nature of the foundational comparison Theorem 2.2.5 on which the complex-side interpretation rests.

major comments (2)
  1. [§8.5, proof of Theorem 8.5.1] The projection step drops the character χ(y). After the trace formula the proof asserts Q = Σ_i (-1)^i (1/|H(C)|) Σ_{y∈H(C)} Σ_{ζ∈I(C)} Tr(yF | IH^i_c(M_C(ζ))) and identifies this with IE(M_C,E^C_χ;q). By the isomorphism (5.5.16) and the inversion formula (5.5.17), with the normalization of (2.3.4), the projector onto the χ-isotypic summand of ⊕_{ζ∈I(C)} IH^*_c(M_C(ζ)) is (1/|H(C)|) Σ_{y∈H(C)} χ(y) y; as written, the displayed chain computes the trivial-character quantity IE(M_C,E^C_1;q) when χ ≠ 1. Inserting the factor χ(y) and applying (5.5.17) at t = -1 gives exactly the claimed identification, so the statement is consistent with Theorem 5.5.10, but the displayed proof must be corrected. The alternative route indicated in Remark 8.5.2 (carrying χ through (7.1.2) and Theorem 8.3.1) is only sketched and does not repair the displayed argument as it stands.
  2. [§2.2, Theorem 2.2.5] The specialization comparison IH_c(X;q,t) = IH_c(X_f;q,t) is load-bearing for the complex-side statements: it enters Remark 1.2.2 and, via Theorem 2.7.3 and Theorem 4.3.3, the K = C case of Theorem 5.5.10. The proof is only a sketch, and the authors state that they 'were not able to locate a proof in the literature.' The delicate steps are (i) the claim that the isomorphism (2.2.7), obtained from the constancy of σ_!Q_ℓ over an open U ⊆ Spec(R), preserves the weight filtration through [11, Théorème 14], and (ii) the identification IH^*_c(X) ≅ ⋂_{T≠X} Ker(r^*_T) inside H^*_c(X̃) and its transfer to X_f through [14] and [3, Lemma 6.2.6], including the weight-preserving isomorphism (2.2.14). I recommend either completing this proof in the text or explicitly stating the complex-geometric theorems as conditional on this comparison.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.5.1, Theorem 5.5.3] The displayed formula IE(M_C;q) = n(qt^2)^{d_ω} H_ω(√q, 1/√q) cannot be right as printed: the Euler specialization removes the t^2 factor, so this should read n q^{d_ω} H_ω(√q, 1/√q), matching Theorem 5.5.10 and the t = -1 specialization of Conjecture 5.5.2.
  2. [§9.5, Formula (9.5.3)] The pure part is displayed with a factor (qt^2)^{k-3}; consistent with (1.2.3) and with the adjacent formula (9.5.1), the pure part contains no t, so the factor should be q^{k-3}.
  3. [§8.5, Remark 8.5.2] Given the gap in the displayed proof of Theorem 8.5.1, the alternative proof sketched in Remark 8.5.2 should either be written out in full or replaced by a corrected version of the main argument; as it stands the remark does not by itself establish the theorem.
  4. [throughout (e.g., §5.5.2, §8.2)] The character group of A(C) is rendered inconsistently: expressions like 'χ∈[A(C)' appear where \(\widehat{A(C)}\) is clearly intended; if this reflects the typeset version, the notation must be fixed, since \(\widehat{A(C)}\) denotes the character group while A(C) denotes the finite component group.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PGL_n formulas are honest reductions to independent GL_n theorems, not definitions or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation reduces PGL_n statements to prior GL_n results, mainly [27, Theorem 4.14] and [28, Theorem 6.10.1], rather than assuming the target claims. The PGL_n local systems E_χ are defined via the isotypic decomposition p_*κ = ⊕ V_χ ⊗ E_χ (equation 5.5.13), and the Euler specialization Theorem 5.5.10 is obtained from the projection formula (5.5.17) together with the GL_n twisted polynomial theorem 4.3.3. In this chain, no PGL_n quantity is fed back into the definition of H_ω; the factors ι(C), Δ_r^{s_χ}, and H_ω are determined combinatorially from the lift types and characters, not fitted to the PGL_n result. Similarly, Theorem 8.2.6 follows from the GL_n multiplicity theorem [28, Theorem 6.10.1] after Frobenius reciprocity, and Theorem 8.5.1 is a reduction to Theorem 5.5.10. These prior theorems are published, parameter-free results whose assumptions do not include the PGL_n target, so the heavy self-citation does not constitute circularity under the stated rules. The acknowledged gap in Theorem 2.2.5 (weight-preserving comparison over Spec(R)) is a support gap, and the possible missing χ(y) in the displayed proof of Theorem 8.5.1 is a correctness concern; neither is an equation that is equivalent to its input by construction. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new postulated entities. Its formulas are built from the H_ω functions and character-sheaf machinery of the prior literature, and its central results are reductions to cited GL_n theorems. The ledger reflects that reliance.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Generic GL_n character stacks have the IC-polynomial property and IE(M_C;q)=q^{d_ω} H_ω(√q,1/√q), cited from [27, Theorem 4.14] and [19, Theorem 1.2.3].
    Used in Theorem 4.3.3 and thus in the Euler specialization Theorem 5.5.10; not reproved in this paper.
  • domain assumption For a generic k-tuple of irreducible characters of GL_n(F_q), the multiplicity of the trivial character in the tensor product equals H_ω(0,√q), cited from [28, Theorem 6.10.1] and reproduced as Theorem 8.1.4.
    The key bridge for Theorem 8.2.6 and the pure-part interpretation; no proof is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption Lusztig's character-sheaf theory and the Langlands correspondence over finite fields, (LSo(G)^F)_split to (CSo(G^♭)^F)_split, are available for PGL_n/SL_n as in Sections 6.3, 6.5, and 7.2.
    Used to define the SL_n character sheaves X^{SL_n}_{C,χ} and to prove their decomposition in Theorem 7.2.1.
  • standard math The decomposition theorem for projective maps and the projectors of de Cataldo and Migliorini preserve weight filtrations under specialization, as used in the sketch of Theorem 2.2.5.
    Needed to compare complex and finite-field intersection cohomology; the paper provides only a sketch, citing [14] and [3, Lemma 6.2.6].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{C})$-character stacks and Langlands duality over finite fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDAISU77

@misc{pith2026241203234,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $\mathrmPGL_n(\mathbbC)$-character stacks and Langlands duality over finite fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDAISU77}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03234}
}
abstract

In this paper we study the mixed Poincar\'e polynomial of generic $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{C})$-character stacks with coefficients in some local systems arising from the conjugacy classes of $\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ which have non-connected stabiliser. We give a conjectural formula that we prove to be true under the Euler specialisation. We then prove that this conjectured formula interpolates the structure coefficients of the two based rings$ \left(\mathcal{C}(\mathrm{PGL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)),Loc(\mathrm{PGL}_n),*\right)$ and $\left(\mathcal{C}(\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q)), CS(\mathrm{SL}_n),\cdot\right) $ where for a group $H$, $\mathcal{C}(H)$ denotes the space of complex valued class functions on $H$, $Loc(\mathrm{PGL}_n)$ denotes the basis of characteristic functions of intermediate extensions of equivariant local systems on conjugacy classes of $\mathrm{PGL}_n$ and $CS(\mathrm{SL}_n)$ the basis of characteristic functions of Lusztig's character-sheaves on $\mathrm{SL}_n$. Our result reminds us of a non-abelian Fourier transform.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators

    math.RT 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper connects invariant differential operators to Langlands duality by showing that Knapp-Stein duality in representation multiplets of SL(2n,R) mimics Langlands dual pairs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [14]

    De Cataldo, M and Migliorini, L : The projectors of the decomposition theorem are motivic, Mathematical Research Letters , 22 (2015), 1061-1088

    work page 2015

  2. [1]

    and Gómez, Tómas L

    Alfaya, D. and Gómez, Tómas L. : Automorphism group of the moduli space of parabolic bundles on a curve, Advances in Mathematics 393 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    : Intersection cohomology of character varieties for punctured Riemann surfaces, J

    Ballandras, M. : Intersection cohomology of character varieties for punctured Riemann surfaces, J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. 10 (2023), 141--198

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    and Deligne, P

    Beilinson, A.A., Bernstein, J. and Deligne, P. : Analyse et topologie sur les espaces singuliers, Astérisque , 100 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [4]

    and Yon Din, A

    Bezrukavnikov, R. and Yon Din, A. : On parabolic restriction of perverse sheaves, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci 57 (2021), 1089--1107

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    and Ginzburg, V

    Chriss, N. and Ginzburg, V. : Representation theory and complex geometry, Modern Bickhauser Classics Boston-Basel-Berlin (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [6]

    and Shaw, P

    Crawley-Boevey, W. and Shaw, P. : Multiplicative preprojective algebras, middle convolution and the Deligne–Simpson problem, Advances in Mathematics 201 (2006), 180--208

    work page 2006

  8. [7]

    : A boson-fermion correspondence in cohomological Donaldson–Thomas theory

    Davison, B. : A boson-fermion correspondence in cohomological Donaldson–Thomas theory. Glasgow Mathematical Journal, 1-2 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    : The integrality conjecture and the cohomology of preprojective stacks

    Davison, B. : The integrality conjecture and the cohomology of preprojective stacks. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) , 2023 , no. 804, (2023), 105-154

    2023

  2. [9]

    and Schlegel Mejia, S

    Davison, B., Hennecart, L. and Schlegel Mejia, S. : BPS Lie algebras for totally negative 2-Calabi-Yau categories and non-abelian Hodge theory for stacks, arXiv:2212.07668

  3. [10]

    : Cohomologie etale, SGA 4-1/2 IV, Lecture Notes in Mathematics SpringerVerlag , 569 , (1977), pp

    Deligne, P. : Cohomologie etale, SGA 4-1/2 IV, Lecture Notes in Mathematics SpringerVerlag , 569 , (1977), pp. 233–261

    1977

  4. [11]

    : Poids dans la cohomologie des variétés algèbriques, Actes du congrès international des mathématiciens (Vancouver) (1974)

    Deligne, P. : Poids dans la cohomologie des variétés algèbriques, Actes du congrès international des mathématiciens (Vancouver) (1974)

    1974

  5. [12]

    : Th\'eorie de Hodge III, Inst

    Deligne, P. : Th\'eorie de Hodge III, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 44

  6. [13]

    and Lusztig, G

    Deligne, P. and Lusztig, G. : Representations of reductive groups over finite fields. Ann. of Math. (2) , 103 (1976), 103--161

    1976

  7. [15]

    and Michel, J

    Digne, F. and Michel, J. : Representations of Finite Groups of Lie Type, London Math. Soc. Student Texts 21 , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1991)

    1991

  8. [16]

    and Haiman, M

    Garsia, A.M. and Haiman, M. : A remarkable q,t-Catalan sequence and q-Lagrange inversion, J. Algebraic Combin. 5 , no. 3, (1996), 191-244

    1996

  9. [17]

    and Whitbread, B

    Giannini, S., Kamgarpour, M., Nam, G. and Whitbread, B. : Counting points on character varieties, arXiv:2409.04735

  10. [18]

    and Rodriguez-Villegas, F

    Hausel, T. and Rodriguez-Villegas, F. : Mixed Hodge polynomials of character varieties , Invent. Math. 174 , No. 3, (2008), 555--624

    2008

  11. [19]

    and Rodriguez-Villegas, F

    Hausel, T., Letellier, E. and Rodriguez-Villegas, F. : Arithmetic harmonic analysis on character and quiver varieties, Duke Math. J. 160 (2011), 323--400

    2011

  12. [20]

    and Rodriguez-Villegas, F

    Hausel, T., Letellier, E. and Rodriguez-Villegas, F. : Arithmetic harmonic analysis on character and quiver varieties II, Adv. Math. 234 (2013), 85--128

    2013

  13. [21]

    : Proof of Springer's hypothesis, Israel J

    Kazhdan, D. : Proof of Springer's hypothesis, Israel J. Math. 28 , 272--286 (1977)

    1977

  14. [22]

    and Weissaeur, R

    Kiehl, R. and Weissaeur, R. : Weil conjectures, perverse sheaves and -adic Fourier transform, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge / A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics , 42 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    : Faisceaux-caract\`eres, Séminaire Bourbaki : volume 1988/89, exposés 700-714, Astérisque , 177-178 (1989)

    Laumon, G. : Faisceaux-caract\`eres, Séminaire Bourbaki : volume 1988/89, exposés 700-714, Astérisque , 177-178 (1989)

    1989

  16. [24]

    and Letellier, E

    Laumon, G. and Letellier, E. : Note on a conjecture of Braverman-Kazhdan, Advances in Mathematics 419 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    and Letellier, E

    Laumon, G. and Letellier, E. : On the derived Lusztig correspondence, Forum Math. Sigma 11 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    : Fourier transforms of invariant functions on finite reductive Lie algebras, Lectures Notes in Mathematics 1859 (2005)

    Letellier, E. : Fourier transforms of invariant functions on finite reductive Lie algebras, Lectures Notes in Mathematics 1859 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    : Character varieties with Zariski closures of _n -conjugacy classes at punctures, Selecta Math

    Letellier, E. : Character varieties with Zariski closures of _n -conjugacy classes at punctures, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 21 (2015), 293--344

    2015

  20. [28]

    : Quiver varieties and the character ring of general linear groups over finite fields, J

    Letellier, E. : Quiver varieties and the character ring of general linear groups over finite fields, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 15 (2013), no. 4, 1375--1455

    2013

  21. [29]

    and Rodriguez-Villegas, F

    Letellier, E. and Rodriguez-Villegas, F. : E-series of character varieties of non-orientable surfaces, Ann. Inst. Fourier 73 (2023), 1385--1420

    2023

  22. [30]

    : Intersection cohomology complexes on a reductive group, Invent

    Lusztig, G. : Intersection cohomology complexes on a reductive group, Invent. Math. 75 (1984), 205--272

    1984

  23. [31]

    : Character sheaves I , Advances in Mathematics 56 (1985), 193-237

    Lusztig, G. : Character sheaves I , Advances in Mathematics 56 (1985), 193-237

    1985

  24. [32]

    : Character sheaves II , Advances in Mathematics 57 (1985), 226-265

    Lusztig, G. : Character sheaves II , Advances in Mathematics 57 (1985), 226-265

    1985

  25. [33]

    : Green functions and character-sheaves, Ann

    Lusztig, G. : Green functions and character-sheaves, Ann. of . Math (2) 131 (1990), 355--408

    1990

  26. [34]

    : Fourier transform on a semisimple Lie algebra over _q , Algebraic groups, Ultrech 1986, Springer Berlin (1987), 177--188

    Lusztig, G. : Fourier transform on a semisimple Lie algebra over _q , Algebraic groups, Ultrech 1986, Springer Berlin (1987), 177--188

    1987

  27. [35]

    and Srinivasan, B

    Lusztig, G. and Srinivasan, B. : The characters of the finite unitary groups, J. Algebra 49 (1977), 167--171

    1977

  28. [36]

    Mars, J. G. M. and Springer, T. A. : Character sheaves. Orbites unipotentes et représentations III. Orbites et faisceaux pervers, Astérisque 173-174 (1989), 111-198

    1989

  29. [37]

    : Integrality of Hausel-Letellier-Villegas kernels, Duke Math

    Mellit, A. : Integrality of Hausel-Letellier-Villegas kernels, Duke Math. J. 167 (2018), 3171--3205

    2018

  30. [38]

    : Poincar\'e polynomials of character varieties, Macdonald polynomials and affine Springer fibers, Ann

    Mellit, A. : Poincar\'e polynomials of character varieties, Macdonald polynomials and affine Springer fibers, Ann. of Math. (2) 1 92 (2020), no. 1, 165--228

    2020

  31. [39]

    : Mixed Hodge modules, Publ

    Saito, M. : Mixed Hodge modules, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 26 (1990) 221-333

    1990

  32. [40]

    : A generalization of Kac polynomials and tensor product of representations of _n( _q) , Transformation Groups (2024)

    Scognamiglio, T. : A generalization of Kac polynomials and tensor product of representations of _n( _q) , Transformation Groups (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    : Cohomology of non-generic character stacks, J

    Scognamiglio, T. : Cohomology of non-generic character stacks, J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. 11 (2024), 1287--1371

    2024

  34. [42]

    : Indecomposable vector bundles and stable Higgs bundles over smooth projective curves, Ann

    Schiffmann, O. : Indecomposable vector bundles and stable Higgs bundles over smooth projective curves, Ann. of Math. (2) 183 (2016), no. 1, 297--362

    2016

  35. [43]

    : Geometry of orbits and Springer correspondence, Ast\'erisque 168 (1988), 61-140

    Shoji, T. : Geometry of orbits and Springer correspondence, Ast\'erisque 168 (1988), 61-140

    1988

  36. [44]

    Simpson, C. T. : Harmonic bundles on noncompact curves, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), 713--770

    1990

  37. [45]

    : Trigonometric sums, Green functions of finite groups and representations of Weyl groups, Invent

    Springer, T. : Trigonometric sums, Green functions of finite groups and representations of Weyl groups, Invent. Math. 36 , 173--207 (1976)

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.