Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Non-Abelian elastic collisions, associated difference systems of equations and discrete analytic functions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A non-abelian Lax system unifies classical, relativistic, and discrete-analytic theories.

desk verdict Good non-abelian Yang-Baxter and difference-system results, but the headline unification of discrete analytic theories needs an unstated commutation condition. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03543 v1 pith:IZIMH4WL submitted 2024-12-04 nlin.SI

Pavlos Kassotakis , Theodoros Kouloukas , Maciej Nieszporski This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SI MSC 37K6039A1437K1016T25
keywords elasticcollisionsYang-Baxtermapsnon-abeliandifferencesystemsnonlinearsigmamodelsdiscreteanalyticfunctionsLaxpairsmultidimensionalconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the equations governing one-dimensional elastic collisions of two particles can be written for variables in an arbitrary associative algebra, and that this non-abelian system acts as a 'top' system from which several abelian theories are obtained by specifying the algebra. In that sense, non-relativistic collisions, relativistic collisions, and both the linear and nonlinear approaches to discrete analytic functions are reductions of the same integrable structure. This matters because it turns a choice between physical or geometric theories into a choice of representation of one underlying algebraic object, and gives the known theories a shared Lax-pair origin.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Lax matrix $L(v,\mu;\lambda)=\begin{pmatrix}\mu+\lambda & \lambda v\\ 0 & \mu-\lambda\end{pmatrix}$ and the matrix refactorization condition $L(v_i',\mu_i';\lambda)L(v_j',\mu_j';\lambda)=L(v_j,\mu_j;\lambda)L(v_i,\mu_i;\lambda)$. This identity carries the argument because demanding it for every spectral parameter $\lambda$, taken in the center of the algebra, forces exactly the four non-abelian equations (1). The same Lax-matrix identity, read on the $\mathbb{Z}^N$ graph, yields edge difference systems that potentialization transforms into vertex systems; compatibility of those vertex systems is what produces the discrete nonlinear $\sigma$-model equation and the linear equation that together organize the discrete-analytic theories.

What would settle it

Exhibit a solution of the vertex system (5) on $\mathbb{Z}^2$ with values in a $2\times2$ matrix algebra in which $\chi$ does not commute with $\phi$ and is not a composition of a single-variable function with $\phi$; if such a solution exists and does not satisfy the discrete Moutard/Cauchy-Riemann equation (65) or reduce to the nonlinear system of Section 6.1.2, the claimed unification of the discrete-analytic theories fails for that representation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the non-abelian difference system (1), together with the Lax-matrix refactorization (2)-(3), is a 'top' system: its reductions recover the non-relativistic elastic collision map, the relativistic elastic collision equations, and, under the assumptions gathered at the start of Section 6, both the linear and the nonlinear theories of discrete analytic functions. The paper proves that the associated non-abelian maps are multidimensionally compatible, that their companion maps are Yang-Baxter maps, and that the vertex-form equations satisfy three-dimensional consistency relations. In short, the discovery is a unification: these abelian theories are special cases of one non-abelian integrable structure.

Load-bearing premise

The unification of the two discrete-analytic theories depends on the assumption, stated before equation (69), that the values of $\chi$ and $\omega$ commute with the values of $\phi$, $\psi$, and $\sigma$ and that each of $\chi$ and $\omega$ factors through each of $\phi$, $\psi$, and $\sigma$ via a single-variable function; if those conditions fail, the paper does not show that the discrete-analytic theories are special cases of the master system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Non-relativistic and relativistic elastic collision equations are not independent theories: both follow from one non-abelian system (1) by choosing the algebra.
  • The non-abelian edge system (49) is multidimensionally compatible, so its solutions on the $N$-cube are consistent, and the companion maps satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation.
  • The vertex systems (50) imply explicit three-dimensional vertex equations, which can be written down and tested on any cubic cell.
  • When the algebra is $\mathbb{C}$, the vertex equations reproduce the discrete Moutard/Cauchy-Riemann condition of the linear theory of discrete analytic functions; when the algebra is the off-diagonal $2\times2$ matrix subspace, they reproduce the nonlinear theory's equations.
  • The master system gives a Lax-pair origin for the Yang-Baxter map denoted $H_A^{III}$ and its two-component extension from relativistic collisions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction should produce additional integrable reductions for other graded or Clifford-type algebras; each such reduction would be another abelian face of the same non-abelian Lax matrix, though the paper does not enumerate them.
  • Because the master system is linear in the shifted edge variables, scanning matrix algebras for solutions of the Sylvester-type equation (41) could yield new Yang-Baxter maps in a systematic way.
  • The Section 6 unification is conditional: testing the commutation and composition assumptions in concrete matrix models is the cleanest way to delimit how much of the discrete-analytic theory the master system actually covers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the non-abelian difference system (1), with variables in a unital associative algebra, together with the Lax matrix (3). It shows that an abelian reduction reproduces the Newtonian elastic collision equations (Proposition 2.1), and that a Z_2-graded 2x2 matrix realization contains the relativistic elastic collision equations (Lemma 2.2, Proposition 2.3). It then constructs non-abelian maps Q_ij from (1), proves their multidimensional compatibility (Theorem 3.4), reinterprets the system as edge and vertex difference equations on the Z^N graph (Theorem 4.1), derives closure relations and 3D vertex equations (Proposition 5.1), and claims in Section 6 that, under three stated assumptions, system (50) reduces to system (69), from which both the linear and nonlinear theories of discrete analytic functions are recovered.

Significance. If the claimed unification holds, the paper is conceptually valuable: a single noncommutative Lax refactorization would serve as a common source for the collision equations and for discrete analyticity. The paper is strong in explicit constructions: the Lax pair, the potentialization procedure, the explicit map formulas, and the identification of the relativistic reduction with the known H_A^III map are concrete and checkable. The main weakness is that the decisive Section 6 reduction contains a missing algebraic hypothesis, and the appendices contain unproved identities, so the headline 'top system' claim is not yet established as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, equations (50) to (69)] Equation (69c) is not a consequence of (50) under the stated assumptions (1)-(3). From (50b) and (50c), (sigma_i - sigma)(chi_i + chi) = phi^{-1}_i phi * phi_i(omega_i - omega)phi^{-1}. Using the assumed commutation of omega with phi, this equals (omega_i - omega) only if phi^{-1}_i phi * phi_i phi^{-1} = 1, i.e. only if phi_i phi = phi phi_i. This commutation between a vertex value and its own forward shift is not among assumptions (1)-(3), and it does not follow from the existence of the functions F_i with chi = F_1 o phi and omega = F_4 o phi. Since (69c) is the equation that produces the discrete analyticity condition (65) in the linear case, the claimed unification in Section 6 is not established.
  2. [Appendix B, around equation (83)] The identity mu_i_jk = mu_j_ik + K_i,j_k is introduced with the phrase 'it can be shown easily', but it is used in the proof of multidimensional compatibility of the maps (32). This is a noncommutative identity involving shifted variables, and no derivation or reference is supplied. The proof of Theorem 3.4 is therefore incomplete at this point and needs a substantiated derivation.
  3. [Section 3.3, after Proposition 3.5] The assertion that the maps Q_ij are quadrirational is made in a single sentence: 'in a similar manner we can find the inverse of the maps Q^c_ij, hence the original maps Q_ij are quadrirational.' Existence and invertibility of solutions of the Sylvester equations (41) are not established under the stated division-ring assumptions. If quadrirationality is claimed, the solvability conditions and a proof of existence of gi,j and hi,j should be provided.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 4.1, item (3), equation (51b)] In the last term on the right-hand side of (51b), the subscript '1' appears where 'i' is evidently intended: it should be phi^{-1}_i (chi_i + chi), not phi^{-1}_1 (chi_i + chi).
  2. [Appendix A, proof of Lemma 3.3(3)] The word 'symetric' should be 'symmetric'.
  3. [System (1)] The expression 'N ≥ 2 ∈ N' is awkward; it should be written as 'N ≥ 2, N ∈ N'.
  4. [Acknowledgements] The project number 'No. 2022/45/P/ST1/0399 8' contains an erroneous space before the final digit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity in the core derivation; Section 6's reduction has an omitted commutation hypothesis that is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central system (1) is introduced independently as a Lax refactorization, and its reductions are verified against external benchmarks: Proposition 2.1 recovers Newtonian collision laws, and Proposition 2.3 derives relativistic momentum-energy conservation from (18b),(18c), with the H_A^III map from [12] as an independent check. The vertex systems (50) are obtained by potentialization from the edge system, not by assuming the target equations. Section 6 does not fit or rename the discrete analytic theories: it aims to derive (69) from (50) under the stated composition and commutation assumptions, and then identifies the abelian limit with Definition 6 and the non-abelian realization with an mKdV-type system from the independently existing literature [60]. The self-citations [1,2] are contextual and are not load-bearing for any proof: the relativistic collision map is written explicitly and cross-checked against the independent H_A^III classification. One substantive caveat, which is non-circular, appears in Section 6.1: the step from (50b),(50c) to (69c) silently uses phi_i*phi = phi*phi_i, a commutation between a function and its shift that is not among assumptions (1)-(3) and does not follow from the F_i-composition conditions. Consequently, the claimed unification is not fully established as written. This is a missing-hypothesis or verification gap, not an equivalence-by-construction or a fitted-input-called-prediction, so the circularity score remains low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its 'top system' is a new algebraic construction, not a new particle, force, or dimension. The only free parameters are arbitrary physical inputs like rest masses, which are not fitted to data.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption A is a unital associative algebra over a field F
    System (1) is defined on such an algebra in Section 1, equation (1).
  • domain assumption For map solutions, A is a division ring so that nonzero differences μ_i - μ_j are invertible
    Section 3, before solving (1); needed for formulas (33)-(34).
  • domain assumption The spectral parameter λ belongs to the center of A
    Section 1, after equation (3); required for the Lax equivalence.
  • standard math The Z^N graph is simply connected, so local compatibility guarantees existence of potentials
    Section 4.2, potentialization step; standard fact in discrete integrable systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The values of χ and ω commute with the values of φ, ψ and σ, and functions F_i exist relating them
    Section 6.1, assumptions (1)-(3) before (69); restrictive and needed for the claimed unification.
  • domain assumption Invertibility of expressions such as μ_j - μ_k, 1 - μ_k(μ_j)^{-1}, etc. in the proofs
    Appendix A, Lemma 3.3; generic nondegeneracy.
  • ad hoc to paper Solutions of the Sylvester equations (41) exist for the companion maps
    Proposition 3.5; existence is asserted but not demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Abelian elastic collisions, associated difference systems of equations and discrete analytic functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IZIMH4WL

@misc{pith2026241203543,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Abelian elastic collisions, associated difference systems of equations and discrete analytic functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IZIMH4WL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03543}
}
abstract

We extend the equations of motion that describe non-relativistic elastic collision of two particles in one dimension to an arbitrary associative algebra. Relativistic elastic collision equations turn out to be a particular case of these generic equations. Furthermore, we show that these equations can be reinterpreted as difference systems defined on the ${\mathbb Z}^2$ graph and this reinterpretation relates (unifies) the linear and the non-linear approach of discrete analytic functions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03543 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Yang-Baxter relation, realised as elastic collision of three particles moving on a circle. That is the outgoing velocities after the interaction of the 1st particle with the 2nd, followed by the interaction of the 1st with the 3rd and finally of the 2nd particle with the 3rd (left figure), are the same if the order of the three interactions is reversed (right figure) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variables assigned on vertices and edges of an elementary cell of the Z 2 graph where the Lax matrix L is given by L(v i , µi ; λ) :=  µ i + λ λvi 0 µ i − λ  . Let all entries of the Lax matrix be assumed to belong to an associative algebra A, and λ, which is referred to as the spectral parameter, assumed to be an element of the center of the algebra. The following holds. (1) The compatibility conditions of the La… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Noncommutative Boussinesq and NLS type 2- and 3-simplex maps

    nlin.SI 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New noncommutative Yang-Baxter and tetrahedron maps for Boussinesq and NLS type systems are constructed and proven to satisfy the defining simplex equations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kouloukas

    T. Kouloukas. Relativistic collisions as yang-baxter m aps. Phys. Lett. A , 381(40):3445 – 3449, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Kouloukas

    T.E. Kouloukas. Discrete integrable systems associated with relativistic collisions. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. , 456:133937, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Bobenko, C

    A.I. Bobenko, C. Mercat, and Y.B. . Suris. Linear and nonl inear theories of discrete analytic functions. inte- grable structure and isomonodromic green’s function. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 2005(583):117–161, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    R.J. Duffin. Potential theory on a rhombic lattice. J. Comb. Theory , 5(3):258–272, 1968

    work page 1968

  5. [5]

    Thurston

    W.P. Thurston. The finite riemann mapping theorem. Invit ed talk at the international symposium on the occasion of the proof of the Bieberbach conjecture, Purdue U niversity, 1985

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    P. D. Lax. Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves. Commun. pure appl. math. , 21(5):467–490, 1968

    work page 1968

  7. [7]

    Mikhailov and T

    A. Mikhailov and T. Skrypnyk. Zhukovsky-Volterra top an d quantisation ideals. Nucl. Phys. B , 1006:116648, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Cherednik

    I.V. Cherednik. Quantum and classical chains for two-di mensional principal chiral fields. Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen., 16(1):89–90, 1982

    work page 1982

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Kouloukas and V.G

    T.E. Kouloukas and V.G. Papageorgiou. Yang-Baxter maps with first-degree-polynomial 2 × 2 lax matrices. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 42(40):404012, 2009

    2009

  2. [10]

    Kouloukas and V.G

    T.E. Kouloukas and V.G. Papageorgiou. Poisson Yang-Ba xter maps with binomial Lax matrices. J. Math. Phys., 52(7):073502, 2011

    2011

  3. [11]

    Bobenko and Y.B

    A.I. Bobenko and Y.B. Suris. Discrete differential geometry: Integrable structure , volume 98. American Math- ematical Soc., 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Papageorgiou, Yu.B

    V.G. Papageorgiou, Yu.B. Suris, A.G. Tongas, and A.P. Veselov. On quadrirational Yang-Baxter maps.SIGMA, 6:9pp, 2010

    2010

  5. [13]

    Adler, A.I

    V.E. Adler, A.I. Bobenko, and Yu.B. Suris. Geometry of Y ang–Baxter maps: pencils of conics and quadrira- tional mappings. Comm. Anal. Geom. , 12(5):967–1007, 2004

    2004

  6. [14]

    Sklyanin

    E.K. Sklyanin. Classical limits of SU(2)–invariant so lutions of the Yang–Baxter equation. J. Soviet Math. , 40:93–107, 1988

    1988

  7. [15]

    Drinfeld

    V.G. Drinfeld. On some unsolved problems in quantum gro up theory, quantum groups. Lecture Notes in Math. , 1510:1–8, 1992

    1992

  8. [16]

    Bukhshtaber

    V.M. Bukhshtaber. Yang-Baxter mappings. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 53:241–242, 1998

    1998

  9. [17]

    A.P. Veselov. Yang-Baxter maps and integrable dynamic s. Phys. Lett. A , 314:214–221, 2003

    2003

  10. [18]

    J.B. McGuire. Study of exactly soluble one-dimensiona l n-body problems. J. Math. Phys , 5:622–636, 1964. 26 P. KASSOTAKIS, T. KOULOUKAS, AND M. NIESZPORSKI

    1964

  11. [19]

    C. N. Yang. Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 19(23):1312–1315, 1967

    1967

  12. [20]

    R.J. Baxter. Partition function of the eight-vertex la ttice model. Ann. Physics, 70:193–228, 1972

    1972

  13. [21]

    R.J. Baxter. Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics . Academic Press, London, 1982

    1982

  14. [22]

    E. Artin. Theorie der z¨ opfe.Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg , 4:47–72, 1925

    1925

  15. [23]

    E. Artin. Theory of braids. Annals of Math. , 48(1):101–126, 1947

    1947

  16. [24]

    Joshi and F.W

    N Hietarinta, J. Joshi and F.W. Nijhoff. Discrete Systems and Integrablity . Cambridge Texts in Applied Math- ematics (No. 54). Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Etingof, T

    P. Etingof, T. Schedler, and A. Soloviev. Set-theoreti cal solutions to the quantum Yang-Baxter equation. Duke Math. J. , 100(2):169 – 209, 1999

    1999

  18. [26]

    Doliwa and M

    A. Doliwa and M. Noumi. The Coxeter relations and KP map f or non-commuting symbols. Lett. Math. Phys. , 110:2743–2762, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Kassotakis and T

    P. Kassotakis and T. Kouloukas. On non-abelian quadrir ational yang-baxter maps. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor , 55(17):175203, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Kassotakis

    P. Kassotakis. Non-abelian hierarchies of compatible maps, associated integrable difference systems and Yang- Baxter maps. Nonlinearity, 36(5):2514, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Konstantinou-Rizos and A.A

    S. Konstantinou-Rizos and A.A. Nikitina. Yang–Baxter maps of KdV, NLS and DNLS type on division rings. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. , 465:134213, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Dimakis and F

    A. Dimakis and F. M¨ uller-Hoissen. Matrix kp: tropicallimit and yang-baxter maps. Lett. Math. Phys., 109:799– 827, 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Kassotakis and M

    P. Kassotakis and M. Nieszporski. Difference systems in bond and face variables and non-potential versions of discrete integrable systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 51(38):385203, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Kassotakis and M

    P. Kassotakis and M. Nieszporski. Families of integrab le equations. SIGMA, 7(100):14pp, 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    Kassotakis and M

    P. Kassotakis and M. Nieszporski. On non-multiaffine con sistent-around-the-cube lattice equations. Phys. Lett. A, 376(45):3135–3140, 2012. arXiv:1106.0435

    2012 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kouloukas and V.G

    T.E. Kouloukas and V.G. Papageorgiou. 3D compatible te rnary systems and Yang-Baxter maps. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 45(34):345204, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    A. Doliwa. Non-commutative lattice-modified Gel’fand-Dikii systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 46(20):205202, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Fordy and P

    A.P. Fordy and P. Xenitidis. ZN graded discrete Lax pairs and integrable difference equatio ns. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 50(16):165205, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Nieszporski and P

    M. Nieszporski and P. Kassotakis. Systems of difference equations on a vector valued function that admits 3d vector space of scalar potentials. arXiv:1908.01706[nlin], 2019

    1908 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Kassotakis, M

    P. Kassotakis, M. Nieszporski, V. Papageorgiou, and A. Tongas. Integrable two-component systems of difference equations. Proc. R. Soc. A. , 476:20190668, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    W.K. Schief. Discrete chebyshev nets and a universal pe rmutability theorem. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 40(18):4775, 2007

    2007

  32. [40]

    Hoffmann, A.O

    T. Hoffmann, A.O. Sageman-Furnas, and J. Steinmeier. Sk ew parallelogram nets and universal factorization. arXiv:2401.08467 [math.DG] , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A. Doliwa. Non-commutative rational Yang-Baxter maps . Lett. Math. Phys. , 104:299–309, 2014

    2014

  34. [42]

    Kassotakis

    P. Kassotakis. Discrete lax pairs and hierarchies of in tegrable difference systems. arXiv:nlin/2104.14529, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Lobb and F

    S. Lobb and F. Nijhoff. Lagrangian multiforms and multid imensional consistency. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 42(45):454013, 2009

    2009

  36. [44]

    Nijhoff and H.W

    F.W. Nijhoff and H.W. Capel. The direct linearization ap proach to hierarchies of integrable PDEs in 2 + 1 dimensions: I. Lattice equations and the differential-diffe rence hierarchies. Inverse Problems, 6:567–590, 1990

    1990

  37. [45]

    V. E. Adler, A. I. Bobenko, and Y. B. Suris. Classificatio n of Integrable Discrete Equations of Octahedron Type. IMRN, 2012(8):1822–1889, 2012

    2012

  38. [46]

    C. Mercat. Discrete complex structure on surfel surfaces. In Proceedings of the 14th IAPR International Confer- ence on Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery. DGCI’08 , pages 153–164, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer- Verlag

    2008

  39. [47]

    Bia/suppress lecki, P

    M. Bia/suppress lecki, P. Kassotakis, and M. Nieszporski. Discrete analytic functions on an embedding of a graph in C. In preparation, 2025. NON-ABELIAN ELASTIC COLLISIONS AND DISCRETE ANALYTIC FUNC TIONS 27

    2025

  40. [48]

    J. J. C. Nimmo and W. K. Schief. Superposition principle s associated with the moutard transformation: an integrable discretization of a (2+1)-dimensional sine-gordon system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. , 453(1957):255–279, 1997

    1957

  41. [49]

    Doliwa, P

    A. Doliwa, P. Grinevich, M. Nieszporski, and P. M. Santi ni. Integrable lattices and their sublattices: From the discrete Moutard (discrete Cauchy-Riemann) 4-point eq uation to the self-adjoint 5-point scheme. J. Math. Phys., 48(1):013513, 2007

    2007

  42. [50]

    J. Ferrand. Fonctions pr´ eharmoniques et fonctions pr´ eholomorphes.Bull. Sci. Math, 2nd ser. , 68:152–180, 1944

    1944

  43. [51]

    R.J. Duffin. Basic properties of discrete analytic funct ions. Duke Math. J. , 23(2):335–363, 1956

    1956

  44. [52]

    Richard James Duffin and Charles S. Duris. A convolution p roduct for discrete function theory. Duke Math. J., 31:199–220, 1964

    1964

  45. [53]

    Hayabara

    S. Hayabara. Operational calculus on the discrete anal ytic functions. Math. Japon., 11:35–65, 1966

    1966

  46. [54]

    Deeter and M.E

    C.R. Deeter and M.E. Lord. Further theory of operationa l calculus on discrete analytic functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 26(1):92–113, 1969

    1969

  47. [55]

    Zeilberger and H

    D. Zeilberger and H. Dym. Further properties of discret e analytic-functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 58(2):405– 418, 1977

    1977

  48. [56]

    Zeilberger

    D. Zeilberger. New approach to theory of discrete analy tic-functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 57(2):350–367, 1977

    1977

  49. [57]

    Alpay, P

    D. Alpay, P. Jorgensen, R. Seager, and D. Volok. On discr ete analytic functions: Products, rational functions and reproducing kernels. J. Appl. Math. Comput. , 41(1-2):393–426, MAR 2013

    2013

  50. [58]

    C. Mercat. Exponentials form a basis of discrete holomo rphic functions on a compact. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. , 132(2):305–326, 2004

    2004

  51. [59]

    C. Mercat. Discrete riemann surfaces and the Ising mode l. Commun. Math. Phys. , 218:177–216, 2001

    2001

  52. [60]

    A. I. Bobenko, S. Sechelmann, and B. Springborn. Discre te conformal maps: Boundary value problems, cir- cle domains, fuchsian and schottky uniformization. In Alex ander I. Bobenko, editor, Advances in Discrete Differential Geometry , pages 1–56. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Ber...

    2016

  53. [61]

    Stephenson

    K. Stephenson. Introduction to the theory of circle packing: discrete anal ytic functions . Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  54. [62]

    Bobenko, T

    A.I. Bobenko, T. Hoffmann, and B.A. Springborn. Discret e minimal surfaces: geometry from combinatorics. Annals of Math. , 164:231–264, 2006

    2006

  55. [63]

    Bobenko and T

    A.I. Bobenko and T. Hoffmann. Hexagonal circle patterns and integrable systems. patterns with constant angles. Duke Math. J. , 116:525–566, 2003

    2003

  56. [64]

    Joshi, K

    N. Joshi, K. Kajiwara, T. Masuda, and N. Nakazono. Discr ete power functions on a hexagonal lattice i: derivation of defining equations from the symmetry of the gar nier system in two variables. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 54(33):335202, 2021

    2021

  57. [65]

    F. W. Nijhoff, A. Ramani, B. Grammaticos, and Y. Ohta. On d iscrete painlev´ e equations associated with the lattice kdv systems and the painlev´ e vi equation.Stud. Appl. Math. , 106(3):261–314, 2001. P avlos Kassotakis, Department of Mathematical Methods in P hysics, F aculty...

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.